In two hours and 30 minutes MauLer completely dismantles Fallout

In two hours and 30 minutes MauLer completely dismantles Fallout

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    in 1 post I say who gives a frick

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you apparently

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kek, based.
      Absolutely nothing more cringe than the queers on this board that unironically take these high school youtube essayists seriously.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fpbp, dubs confirm

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      FPBP also checked

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fpbp

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        FPBP also checked

        fpbp, dubs confirm

        Can you morons stop.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know, can you?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I need to listen to a fat frick sperging for close to 3h to know if I enjoyed something or not
      Get a life.

      FPBP
      /thread

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      OP and his homosexual youtuber friend eternally BTFO

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      brutal raping of OP

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fpbp
      Fallout is gay but Mauler is a raging homosexual.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >a brief Fallout review
    >10:00:00
    >Part 1 of 3
    Thanks, no

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >fat autist goes full autistic for 10 hours

      You need a 3 hour video to tell you Fallout is shit?

      All of these are me btw, I'm trans and the hrt makes me unable to read!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yiff in hell furgay.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How much of it is him reading wiki articles for a series he claims to be a massive fan of?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He never claims to be a fun. He critiques the show on its inability to maintain its own logical consistency.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But anybody could do that. And have on here. His insights aren’t special or interesting. Plus his suggestions tend to be rather shit. What do you guys blow each other?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Plus his suggestions tend to be rather shit.
          What suggestions?
          As I said the video is mostly focused on going over the logical inconsistencies in the show. He doesn't provide suggestions on it. Honestly the show is unsalvageable for this

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What inconsistencies are there?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              What the video it's right there. There are so many that the length of the video is warranted.
              But since you're a gay, here is one of them:
              >Lucy loses her finger
              >The robot gives her a new one
              >He does this even though he is going to harvest her for organs immediately after

              Incase you need an explanation for why this is inconsistent, ask yourself, "Why would the robot give Lucy a finger even though he is going to harvest her organs?"
              If you can give me an answer as to why the robots actions are consistent with its job of organ harvesting I will concede and call the show a masterpiece.
              The clear answer the writers needed Lucy to be not permanently maimed, however they wanted to be damaged and feel more distrustful, so they tried to have their cake and eat it too.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >>Lucy loses her finger
                >>The robot gives her a new one
                >>He does this even though he is going to harvest her for organs immediately after
                >Incase you need an explanation for why this is inconsistent, ask yourself, "Why would the robot give Lucy a finger even though he is going to harvest her organs?"
                You're going to find any reason to dislike the show, but breaking down the writer's intent like that brings up comparative moments in films like Empire Strikes Back or Thor losing his eye in Ragnarok only to get it back in Infinity War, which are films that Mauler likes.
                The only difference is that it comes from a robot that harvests organs, but the context of that scene, it could be explained easily with Snip Snip gaining her distrust and disarming, and if all goes to plan, he'll just take the finger back anyways after he was done.
                These critiques are asinine, because logical consistency is not the only criteria for good story telling. Building suspense, tension, distrust, atmosphere or character are also factors to play here. In terms of "logical inconsistency", that's not even that bad, it's such a shallow critique that's almost like he watched it by pausing it so many times, going on a tangent in his head, and missing the context of that scene.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >distrust
                kek, I meant *trust, gaining her trust to disarm her so he could knock her out without a fuss, and leave the audience on with suspsense.
                Always proof read your posts

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it could be explained easily with Snip Snip gaining her distrust and disarming
                Why does he need to do this if he can easily put her unconscious (which he had done easily after giving the finger). He could've done it while she was unconscious.
                Yet again, makes not a shred of sense.

                >Thor losing his eye in Ragnarok only to get it back in Infinity War,
                This is entirely different. Thor getting back an eye was fine as at least it is sensible for him to get it back and it isn't contrived. If I remember correctly, Rocket gave it to him as a form of consolation after Thor opened up about everything he has lost.
                This is entirely different from a character acting against his own motivation just so the writer can avoid consequences of their own writing.
                I don't watch Star Wars so I'm not sure what you are talking about.

                I agree that the only criteria for good storytelling isn't logical consistency, however, it is a foundation for good storytelling.
                I want to love the suspense, the atmosphere, the themes, and the characters, but this can't happen when anything can happen because logical consistency is folly to the writers feelings.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Why does he need to do this if he can easily put her unconscious
                Because it builds character and creates an actual scene where the audience can observe the actions of characters.
                >This is entirely different. Thor getting back an eye was fine as at least it is sensible for him to get it back and it isn't contrived.
                Not the point. It isn't about rather or not it's justified, but that contexts are different and that bodily dismemberment and regaining those body parts later is not an inherently inconsistent contrivance for "distrust" or "being damaged." Mailer's critique is so shit and generalized that it could be applied to films he likes. That's the point, and I think the context of Lucy losing her finger to Snip works fine in context. That contradiction of Snip Snail's initial desire to help Lucy only to reveal his true intent is done tonally and comically to build on his character.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because it builds character and creates an actual scene where the audience can observe the actions of characters.
                How about the place of the characters in a non-moronic situation that makes it so when they overcome it it actually builds character?
                Due to how nonsensical the scene is, the character is not built but a realisation of the incompetence of the writer is instead.
                I want characters to be put into tough situations, not impossible ones where the writer has to bullshit a way out.

                >Not the point.
                What do you mean not the point? The reason I'm calling it bad in the first place is because it is contrived for Lucy to receive a finger from the robot.
                You bring up Ragnorok/ Infinity War, I explain why it works there. What the frick do you mean by not the point?

                Mauler's criticisms weren't vague, it was direct and curt. Mauler's point is basically the same as mine.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >How about the place of the characters in a non-moronic situation that makes it so when they overcome it it actually builds character?
                "Non-moronic" in this case is being so autistic that you miss the point of a scene? Yeah, something's moronic but it isn't the scene, kek. Even if we want to play Mauler's game and critique things the way he does, how invalid is it to point out that if the goal is to harvest organs, then they'll be getting pretty much everything, including the finger, back. Why is that an invalid interpretation of that scene? Is it because Mauler and his fans are incredibly autistic and stubborn and will not accept any reading of the text that isn't theirs?
                >What do you mean not the point? The reason I'm calling it bad in the first place is because it is contrived for Lucy to receive a finger from the robot.
                The robot is a reprogrammed medical Mr. Handy that's original purpose was to heal and stitch up people, now he's designed to harvest organs. He decides to give Lucy a replacement finger because that was his original programming but then his reprogrammed objective kicks in and he reveals his intent because he isn't programmed with nuance or subtly.
                I brought up Empire and Ragnarok because as you said "The clear answer the writers needed Lucy to be not permanently maimed, however they wanted to be damaged and feel more distrustful, so they tried to have their cake and eat it too."
                And yeah, that is is the writer's intent and there was nothing wrong with how he did it. What was wrong was that the context of this was dark humor that goes over the heads of autists like Mauler. Yes, the writer's intent was for Lucy to be injured seriously enough to change her perception of her place in the world, and to not keep her permanently maimed. It shows her that this is not going to be a cake walk and that the world she's in is violence and crass. Something anyone with a braincell could figure out but not Mauler and his fans.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >"Non-moronic" in this case is being so autistic that you miss the point of a scene?
                I get the point of the scene, you agree with me on the point. I'm saying that it could've been done much much better, especially if the writers are competent.
                The reason I'm critiquing this is so that we can adequatley praise when a writer does it well, such as in Infinity war, but for some reason you don't want to accept that.
                We both agree that the characters get hurt and healed because that is what the writer wanted, however the difference is in how the writer will contrive everything in order to get what they want instead of writing anything logical.

                >It shows her that this is not going to be a cake walk
                I mean it clearly was, she got her finger back soon after and was never placed in a position where she was affected by it, aside the pain of losing a finger.

                >What was wrong was that the context of this was dark humor that goes over the heads of autists like Mauler
                How is that dark humor? It doesn't come off like it. And even if it was it's not funny.

                [...]
                Also, yes, Mauler's point is vague and generalized. Since he went after the writer's intent to imply that it was the idea that was flawed, that opened up his critique to fail when you apply to things he likes, Empire and Thor do the same thing to accomplish similar goals but have tremendously different contexts and that's fine. All three stories do it and they don't do it wrong, because the dismemberment have a different purpose in each example. I used it as an example because it's genuinely a moronic critique, which is per the norm for Mauler.

                I can't speak on the empire but I can speak on Thor. It is done well there and not here, I've said and explained it. Do you guys just want to make sure that Mauler contradicts himself by ignoring all other arguments

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The reason I'm critiquing this is so that we can adequatley praise when a writer does it well, such as in Infinity war, but for some reason you don't want to accept that.
                The problem is there is no set "way" of doing it. Bodily dismemberment can be done to show the stakes a character is up against, or show the character physically changed, or in this case, dark humor in which Snip is revealed to be a reprogrammed Mr Handy doing the opposite of his intended purpose. I don't think it was contrived at all, a contrivance implies the plot progression was forced to progress in a way it couldn't have without that action, and that's not true here. It's scene showing the danger of the Wasteland in a way that personally affects and puts Lucy in danger. Her getting her finger back only to be dragged off for organ harvesting isn't really a stretch, it seems it depends on how you interpret the interaction and coming from someone who played the games and recall that Mr Handys being reprogrammed to fulfill contradicting functions isn't far fetched to me.
                >I mean it clearly was, she got her finger back soon after and was never placed in a position where she was affected by it, aside the pain of losing a finger
                The fact she lost it in the first place is already proof the violence of the Wasteland is something out of her range. And again, to bring up Star Ears and Thor, you can use this same argument about the stakes being lessened in those films since their bodily dismemberment was patched up in the next scene or movie. These three scenes each serve their own purposes, have their own contexts and meaning, but the critique that Mauler himself makes is as I've said, vague and generalized, that it can be applied to Empire and Thor, because he ultimately forgoes context and meaning.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Star Ears
                I fricking hate autocorrect, *Star Wars

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The reason I'm critiquing this is so that we can adequatley praise when a writer does it well, such as in Infinity war, but for some reason you don't want to accept that.
                The problem is there is no set "way" of doing it. Bodily dismemberment can be done to show the stakes a character is up against, or show the character physically changed, or in this case, dark humor in which Snip is revealed to be a reprogrammed Mr Handy doing the opposite of his intended purpose. I don't think it was contrived at all, a contrivance implies the plot progression was forced to progress in a way it couldn't have without that action, and that's not true here. It's scene showing the danger of the Wasteland in a way that personally affects and puts Lucy in danger. Her getting her finger back only to be dragged off for organ harvesting isn't really a stretch, it seems it depends on how you interpret the interaction and coming from someone who played the games and recall that Mr Handys being reprogrammed to fulfill contradicting functions isn't far fetched to me.
                >I mean it clearly was, she got her finger back soon after and was never placed in a position where she was affected by it, aside the pain of losing a finger
                The fact she lost it in the first place is already proof the violence of the Wasteland is something out of her range. And again, to bring up Star Ears and Thor, you can use this same argument about the stakes being lessened in those films since their bodily dismemberment was patched up in the next scene or movie. These three scenes each serve their own purposes, have their own contexts and meaning, but the critique that Mauler himself makes is as I've said, vague and generalized, that it can be applied to Empire and Thor, because he ultimately forgoes context and meaning.

                >How is that dark humor? It doesn't come off like it. And even if it was it's not funny.
                Snip's friendly demeanor, his original purpose as a medical robot, and when Lucy tells Snip that she thinks the Ghoul is going to turn her into a sex slave, he responds he's going to harvest her organs instead. The comedy being what Lucy thought was going to happen is actually much worse. You don't need to find it funny but that's the joke.
                In regards to Thor, again, bringing it up is to highlight the ways Mauler's critique on the writer's intent can be applied to films with similar moments of bodily dismemberment. The problem isn't rather or not it's "done right", it's the argument itself. It's trying to come off as deeper than it is by stating the obvious intent of the writer. And it is obvious, but that doesn't make it bad here. It's just a differently structured scene with its own purpose and context. Why such a harsh critique here when it can applied to similar scenes? Not because the writer failed in his execution but because Mauler is autistic and his method of reviewing films is shallow and pedantic.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Writer's intent is just writer's intent. It doen't make something good or bad. It's just a means of understanding a scene.
                Writer's intent is brought up when explaining what the scene was meant to convey and what the audience is expected to feel.

                Why do you fill hellbent on saying that the is a contradiction in Mauler's logic when there is most definetly a difference in the situations. There is no critique on the Thor scenes where it is nonesensical for him to lose an eye and to gain another.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >How about the place of the characters in a non-moronic situation that makes it so when they overcome it it actually builds character?
                "Non-moronic" in this case is being so autistic that you miss the point of a scene? Yeah, something's moronic but it isn't the scene, kek. Even if we want to play Mauler's game and critique things the way he does, how invalid is it to point out that if the goal is to harvest organs, then they'll be getting pretty much everything, including the finger, back. Why is that an invalid interpretation of that scene? Is it because Mauler and his fans are incredibly autistic and stubborn and will not accept any reading of the text that isn't theirs?
                >What do you mean not the point? The reason I'm calling it bad in the first place is because it is contrived for Lucy to receive a finger from the robot.
                The robot is a reprogrammed medical Mr. Handy that's original purpose was to heal and stitch up people, now he's designed to harvest organs. He decides to give Lucy a replacement finger because that was his original programming but then his reprogrammed objective kicks in and he reveals his intent because he isn't programmed with nuance or subtly.
                I brought up Empire and Ragnarok because as you said "The clear answer the writers needed Lucy to be not permanently maimed, however they wanted to be damaged and feel more distrustful, so they tried to have their cake and eat it too."
                And yeah, that is is the writer's intent and there was nothing wrong with how he did it. What was wrong was that the context of this was dark humor that goes over the heads of autists like Mauler. Yes, the writer's intent was for Lucy to be injured seriously enough to change her perception of her place in the world, and to not keep her permanently maimed. It shows her that this is not going to be a cake walk and that the world she's in is violence and crass. Something anyone with a braincell could figure out but not Mauler and his fans.

                Also, yes, Mauler's point is vague and generalized. Since he went after the writer's intent to imply that it was the idea that was flawed, that opened up his critique to fail when you apply to things he likes, Empire and Thor do the same thing to accomplish similar goals but have tremendously different contexts and that's fine. All three stories do it and they don't do it wrong, because the dismemberment have a different purpose in each example. I used it as an example because it's genuinely a moronic critique, which is per the norm for Mauler.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Luke losing his hand and becoming part robot is both thematically important and plot relevant though. Yoda warns Luke that he isn't ready, and we see that as a result of trying to fight Vader before he was ready he isn't just defeated, he has fallen closer to the dark side. The revelation that Vader is his father has caused him to become part machine, just like his father. He is following Anakin's path to failure.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, that's why context matters. Mauler making that critique, like I said in my prior post, is fricking moronic because it's vague and generalizing and it could be applied to things he likes. Luke losing his hand and getting a robot hand fits the context of that film, Thor losing his eye fits the context of Ragnarok and Infinity War, and Snips giving Lucy a finger before knocking her out to harvest her organs fits in the context of that scene because he's a robot who's initial function for caring and healing people was tampered to murder and harvest people instead. It builds suspense, it's consistent with the irreverent tone of the show, and it reveals character and atmosphere. Compared to just knocking her out and having no build up at all? Scene construction matters.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >autist doesn't understand joke with reprogrammed psycho medical bot
                >blows a fuse and goes on a rant
                Shocking

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe to lull her into a false sense of security, maybe the robot is programmed to provide medical assistance. This isn't much of an issue, more of a nitpick

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because it's a semi-malfunctioning medical assistance robot that got reprogrammed for organ harvesting by two dumbasses, clearly it still runs its medical routines independently of its newly assigned task.

                Holy shit idiots like you are why most other shows have characters explaining every little thing to the moronic audience.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >reprogrammed
                >by two dumbasses
                Reprogram your roomba to compete in racing. You aren't a dumbass right? Even a dumbass can reprogram a robot according to you.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a Mr Handy which are designed to be multifunctional.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're right, anon. Dumbasses like this are also producers who choke the nuance out of every screenplay with pages of notes.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                this is why people keep saying 'media literacy'

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It was a med bot with added programming and some of the existing coding left in. Perfectly logical.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You just made shit up.
                You're just writing for the writers.
                And even if we go with your writing that would mean that the robot would work on the injuries on everyone that was brought to be harvested. It would be no longer inconsistent but instead nonsensical.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Have you heard of the saying "show, don't tell" perchance?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What did he made up?
                It's clearly a pre-war medical bot, not something designed from the ground up to harvest organs. You don't even have to play the games to get that.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >not something designed from the ground up to harvest organs
                There is a bot that harvest organs in Fallout 2 in the SAD. redditors love fan service

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Have you heard of the saying "show, don't tell" perchance?

                I'm not saying the medical robot part is made up. I'm talking about the moron saying that Lucy being given a finger is part of leftover code.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That is a logical conclusion to the fact it is a medical bot modified to do something it wasn't designed to do.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But that in of itself doesn't make sense as the medical robot is assumed to have been doing this multiple times. If they are willing to reprogram the robot to perform harvesting then they should be willing to reprogram further to stop it from performing useless medical procedures.

                I guess you're the kind of person who needs a character to say "Oh yeah this was originally a medical robot but we reprogrammed it to harvest organs but it still runs its medical routine so that's why it fixed your finger first, by the way this is humorous because of the incongruence of a robot switching from being helpful to being murderous while maintaining the exact same demeanor haha".

                morons like you are why most shows and movies are so shit now.

                zoomers have the media literacy of a rock
                they need to be spoon feed or every 10 seconds or they lose all concentration

                See

                [...]
                I'm not saying the medical robot part is made up. I'm talking about the moron saying that Lucy being given a finger is part of leftover code.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You expect too much from beavis and butthead. The entire joke is that the organ harvesting base is run by 2 mouthbreathers and a robot smarter than the both of them

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >a robot smarter than the both of them
                But not smart enough to not waste time and resources.

                Lets just leave this argument as it can't get through your thickheaded skulls. There is still the issue of the robot still not knocking Lucy out like it did the first time, and still the issue of not harvesting her organs while she is knocked out. Or can medical robots now not cut someone open while they are asleep?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The show establishes them as lazy morons.
                Why would they bother? Are fingers that precious to them?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How are they morons if they can reprogram a robot?

                >Are fingers that precious to them?
                Clearly precious enough to have a drawer full of them.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't take a PhD to go "Dude, harvest organs for us"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't take a PhD to go "Dude, we don't need the fingers"

                And wasn't the argument that the robot was programmed? Is there no consistency to your argument? Even if you aren't the same guy, you shouldn't be moronic enough to not understand how the argument got here

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >And wasn't the argument that the robot was programmed?
                It's a robot capable of human speech. There's no reason it can't be programmed using human speech.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I guess you're the kind of person who needs a character to say "Oh yeah this was originally a medical robot but we reprogrammed it to harvest organs but it still runs its medical routine so that's why it fixed your finger first, by the way this is humorous because of the incongruence of a robot switching from being helpful to being murderous while maintaining the exact same demeanor haha".

                morons like you are why most shows and movies are so shit now.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                zoomers have the media literacy of a rock
                they need to be spoon feed or every 10 seconds or they lose all concentration

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >over the logical inconsistencies in the show.
            Any autist with a pirated copy of Adobe Premiere can do this. There's nothing special in his analysis of any media, which themselves are him regurgitating critiques from other YouTubers.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the video is mostly focused on going over the logical inconsistencies in the show
            Unironically the dimwit idea of critique, popularized by moronic shit like CinemaSins, because they're too fricking ignorant and dumb to actually tackle thematic subjects or anything more philosophically relevant than "why didn't they just fly to Mordor?!" level nitpicking, or arguing about characters power levels consistency.
            Not wonder they only talk about nerd-targeted slop.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              So you believe that logic is irrelevant and that themes are what is most important?
              Doesn't this mean that you can never critique anything as long as it has a theme?

              That just means that you will consume whatever is shit out as long it is tackles thematic subjects even though they will inevitably contradict themselves, inconsistency is just whenever the writers feel like something should happen, it happens.

              What is thematically tackled in Fallout that any critiques shouldn't be applied to it?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Doesn't this mean that you can never critique anything as long as it has a theme?
                No, it just means you have the mental capacity to watch Armageddon and Basterds without sperging out that NASA would rather train astronauts to drill, and Hitler ackhyually wasn't killed by some random commandoes in a French movie theater.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Basterds
                Who sperged about Inglorious Basterds?
                I like that movie

                And it seems like you are misunderstanding the argument. The issue isn't realism but instead verisimilitude.
                It is the expectation for a fictional world to react appropriately to the fictional rules set.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All I see is some autist not understanding the setting and a "haha, I'm a kooky psycho doc" joke.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So is every rebuttal of yours going to be it's a joke even though the scene isn't written that way.
                And what does the setting have to do with it? Did the radiation make everyone moronic and I wasn't told?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well it definitely made you moronic.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I accept your concession.

                I prefer a new story over rehashing an existing one. I dropped the last of us after 1 episode because it was 1:1 the game I played

                You must have forgotten the game as it is far from 1:1. You should notice that from the beginning.
                I'm sorry to tell you but Tess making out with a zombie wasn't part of the game.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No logical consistency is secondary when it just serves the adherence to "realism" in the story.
                It's primary when it supports the thematic point (and heart) of the story.
                And just having a theme doesn't mean shit, obviously, the critique should focus on what the piece explores about a theme, what it says about it, that is new or interesting or poignant.
                A story development that betrays a thematic point is much bigger than one that simply creates a small logical contrivance.

                This is harder to analyze because it takes a deeper knowledge of things than pointing out that a character couldn't have moved that fast because in real life nobody moves that fast, which is a shallow, dimwit reading of a piece of art.

                Now, I'm not saying all various deus ex machina and other lazy shortcuts are good, or shouldn't be criticized, but when that's all you focus on and all you can really see, then it becomes a worthless critique.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I want verisimilitude not realism.
                Plot is the most basic part of a story, why should I care about the rest when the writers clearly don't care.

                >A story development that betrays a thematic point is much bigger than one that simply creates a small logical contrivance.
                >small logical contrivance.
                The issue with the show is that the the contrivances aren't small, they fact of contrivances is the only consistent part of the show.
                Each and every scene has something going wrong with it that it is impressive.
                I am willing to forgive small contrivances especially in the beginning of a story however there are too many in this show that it is distracting.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty nuanced topic, but it's more that the importance of logic shouldn't be overstated. The emotional experience is what's important overall and that's usually more related to theme. Criticizing logic that completely falls apart is fine but generally I think logic rarely ruins things that work for people on an emotional level and inconsistencies are forgiven. Focus on logic strikes me as an unwillingness to engage in the actual meat of the material that really decided the reviewer's feelings on the art.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              All the things you value in your entertainment is accomplished through consistency. Without it, there is no world building, there is no drama or tension, there is no characters and there is no themes or arcs.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              What are the themes of the fallout show? Don't trust your family, trust terrorists and outlaws that try to rape and kill you? The world may seem like a chaotic and complex struggle for resources, but it's actually all controlled by ancient greedy evil masterminds?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The world may seem like a chaotic and complex struggle for resources, but it's actually all controlled by ancient greedy evil masterminds?
                Cool it with the anti-semitic remarks.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The last one. Greed being the downfall of humanity and persisting after the apocalypse. The setting is also used to explore various political ideologies interacting with one another in a state of nature

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You realize you just did the kind of criticism he was asking for right?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                White women should trust black murderers and point a gun at their dads if they try to break them up.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              > because they're too fricking ignorant and dumb to actually tackle thematic subjects
              MauLer talks about themes in almost all his videos. Also the themes don’t mean anything if the plot is so fricking broken that it muddles the theme.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm looking for something of value in the fallout video and he's just explaining plot points while saying "this is moronic" and showing clips. what a waste of time

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >and he's just explaining plot points
                While demonstrating how the plot points make no fricking sense, yes.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't get that. at most it's the classic "this character is not infallible and therefore this is bad writing"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There is a difference between a character being fallible and bad writing.
                In fact we could just say "these characters are completely nonsensical and therefore this is bad writing"
                Everyone in this goddamn show is stupid

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There's a whole section of him not understanding why vault tec wants to start a war while also showing clips of multiple characters explaining the war economy and fiduciary responsibility.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's what happens when autists without a theory of mind like Mauler try to critique film.

                >Why didn't Sally look in the box for her marble? This is a clear plot hole.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The characters aren’t bad because they’re infallible. They’re bad because their actions make no fricking sense. Luke isn’t a bad character in nuwars because he almost killed his nephew and ran away, he’s a bad character in nuwars because him almost killing his nephew and running away is a complete contradiction of his character.

                That's what happens when autists without a theory of mind like Mauler try to critique film.

                >Why didn't Sally look in the box for her marble? This is a clear plot hole.

                Why don’t you attack the actual critiques he made of the show instead of making up strawmen? It would make you look a lot less like an assblasted moron.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the actions do make sense though. characters explain their motivations in simple terms and the moron still goes "well that's not how capitalism really works"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the character explains their motivations so that makes it good
                no it doesnt. This sort of moron logic is just one step above "its sci-fi/fantasy so this means ANYTHING is allowed!"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > the actions do make sense though
                The knight threatening the only guy who can save his life makes sense and totally isn’t just shitty contrived writing so the writers can get Maximus into the suit?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Can you explain the deep lore behind people shoving their victim into a suit of power armor?

                Did this happen for a reason or because they all read the script?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the actions do make sense though
                Barely any of what these characters do makes any fricking sense it feels like I'm watching a bunch of people act like cartoon characters straight out of channel awesome, did Emil have a hand in writing this shitload frick of a show?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >But anybody could do that
          And yet no one else has, so he's done us a big favor.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And anybody can waffle for 10minutes using empty phrases and emotive language.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >He never claims to be a fun
        Well at least he realises that.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > maintain its own logical consistency
        Reiterate 3 of this points. I didn’t pay for fallout and I won’t give this spastic any money either.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Fallout never pretended to be logically consistent.
        It’s like someone analyzing a joke and saying it’s unlikely for a rabbi and a priest to visit the same bar.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >It’s like someone analyzing a joke
          But jokes can be analyzed.

          And saying it never pretended to be logically consistent is the most moronic excuse. If you want something that doesn't pretend to be logically consistent watch Scot pilgrim. But that is more consistent than the nonsense in the show

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes it did and even it's most minor retcons don't even come close to the frick stupid plotholes in the first episode alone.
          >vault is under constant repairs due to radiation leaks
          >people are going sterile
          >this is such an issue there needs to be an arranged marriage with another vault
          >for whatever reason none of them realize that they don't recognize a single person from the vault they've spent centuries trading with
          >for whatever reason none of their geiger counters alert them to the fact that they're outsiders until lucy does in a contrived and lazy attempt to have some sort of twist
          The writing in this show is so fricking lazy, besides all of the ludicrously unfriendly lore shit already present.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >vault is under constant repairs due to radiation leaks
            citation please
            >people are going sterile
            citation please
            >this is such an issue there needs to be an arranged marriage with another vault
            It's called the triennial trade, which exists mostly to maintain genetic diversity in these relatively small population vaults and to also continually wake the Vault-Tec management from 31.
            >for whatever reason none of them realize that they don't recognize a single person from the vault they've spent centuries trading with
            Trading between 32 and 33 probably doesn't happen often. There is a trade every 3 years and it's not specified whether they always gather up for a party or mingle.
            >for whatever reason none of their geiger counters alert them to the fact that they're outsiders until lucy does in a contrived and lazy attempt to have some sort of twist
            Geiger probably isn't turned on all the time, especially if they think they're completely safe after 219 years with no issues.

            Were you hallucinating while watching the show or...?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Not him, but Bert was from 32 and should have mentioned how he doesn't recognize any of the people. Also Vaults don't tend to have much change in management, so a bunch of complete strangers showing up after who knows how many triennial meetings with the same dudes should have been suspicious.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Bert was from 32
                Bert is a 33 native. His wife Steph is from 31.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Steph's description on Amazon once said Bert was originally a resident of Vault 32 who was traded to Vault 33 as a "breeder" in exchange for some of Vault 33's mechanical and agricultural resources. However, this would raise questions as to why Bert did not recognize Lee Moldaver or any of her raiders from Vault 32. The description was later updated to never mention where Bert is from, making it possible it was an error or something that was retconned out.
                Guess they noticed and retconned it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                When the show can't even be consistent with itself.
                It's funny how they got the episode titles wrong, they didn't match with the ones within the episode. And even better their response was to remove the titles and just have them be episode 1,2,3, etc

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Gotta put that degree in film to use

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You don't need a degree in film to engage your brain while watching a series.

          Why would anyone expect the Fallout show to be good? The Bethesda games aren't even good. Bethesda has never made a well written Fallout game and is incapable of ever doing so. They're fun to play though.

          At this point I'm convinced the writing in the show is intentionally bad so that when people go back to play the game they don't get hit with wiplash with how bad it is

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thats Destiny Anon

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is the only Fallout review I cared about

    ?

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can't stop noticing the keyhole on his gasmask since someone pointed it out. What is that a fart fetish thing?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      key+nose = kino

      gayatron

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a chastity cage for his mouth because he can't stop sucking wiener.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Someone says stuff I don't like>I can't attack what he said
      >So I will make shit up
      >And attack that
      You people are so obvious and sad, fat too. I don't even like Mauler yet you people and people like you are subhuman in your inability to be human.
      Pathetic

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Coalburning prostitute series written by captain marvel writers.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >fat autist goes full autistic for 10 hours

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You need a 3 hour video to tell you Fallout is shit?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, but it can be useful as a means of just going through different parts of it.
      There is so much information to parse in a show that is 7-8 hours long that the contrivances can go over your head when the last relevant moment was hours before

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Going over a film on a pedantic, plot-hole level critique is one of the time wasting and pointless ways to analyse film. All it boils down to is if you're willing to suspend to disbelief or not, there's nothing you can do if someone tells you the plot inconsistency don't bother them outside of being so incredibly autistic that someone not bending the knee or agree with you pisses you off. Which it does to Mauler. The other issue is Mauler is himself not consistent with this, since he'll give a free pass to films with inconsistencies if he likes them. Like Avengers Endgame or Spider-Man: No Way Home, off the top of my head. He's willing to make excuses for why it's okay for those films and other franchise films he likes. The reason why someone might like or not like a film varies. They could like it because of the film making or the aesthetic or the characters or plot and they could be informed enough to construct a strong enough point in favor of any of these. What Mauler's form of critique really is just policing and dictating what you can and can't like based on arbitrary standards that he usually pulls out of his ass to justify shitting on you for liking something he doesn't like. He started all this and his objectivist movement just because he wanted the authority to gatekeep and shut out other film reviewers that don't bend the knee to him because he fundamentally lacks even a basic understanding of film production or narrative construction, but pretends he does because he watched Red Letter Media and Every Frame a Painting essays before.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not going to read this post
          But I will watch the 38 minute critique of this post when it's ready in 6 months

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Going over a film on a pedantic, plot-hole level critique is one of the time wasting and pointless ways to analyse film. All it boils down to is if you're willing to suspend to disbelief or not
          Not even a fan of Mauler, but I disagree. There's a vast difference between a film/show that requires you to suspend your disbelief at the outset but then remains internally consistent, and one that keeps requiring you to hand-wave shit away every five minutes, to the point where nothing has any weight to it, because the rules can be rewritten at any moment. (And it's a sliding scale, so allowances might be made for something with a few instances of questionable logic but which is otherwise well written and fun, say.) To pretend otherwise is to defend terrible modern-Hollywood "writing".

          Plot-hole-listing is a very basic (and often boring) form of analysis, sure, but it's a reflection of how terrible current-year Hollyslop is.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This argument is always shit, it takes the show creaters years to make it but we can't critique it for more than 10 minutes?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The argument is actually about how a literal-who like Blaubber is /tv related, but you will tell me over 4 hours how a "content creator" somehow is.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So let me get this straight, the good guy, the black woman ofc, comes to a vault with raiders, slaughters dwellers, leaves her friend daughter to die and we're supposed to root for her?
    Mauler is making this shit up, right?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Actually, yes. He did make that up. I never got the idea that she was good, or that I was suppose to root for her. Besides Lucy, there doesn't seem to be anyone you could realistically label a good guy.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's literally the plot. I still stand by fallout being 6/10 though

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In one picture, Frog Queen dismantles MauLer's 2 hour video

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thats pretty mid senpai

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        For you

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based
      Post Ellas

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Cute frog
        But is your sperm count high enough for her?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >In two hours and 30 minutes MauLer completely dismantles the first five minutes of Fallout

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What inclines you to make shit up?
      What does this dishonesty do for you?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What inclined Mauler to make shit up about liking the main antagonist, after we saw her massacre the protagonist's entire vault?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So let me get this straight, the good guy, the black woman ofc, comes to a vault with raiders, slaughters dwellers, leaves her friend daughter to die and we're supposed to root for her?
          Mauler is making this shit up, right?

          He isn't claiming that she is a good guy.
          He is bringing up that the show is inconsistent with the character portrayed in the beginning and in the end of the show.
          It is clear that the writers wanted Muldavid to be sympathetic in the end but it comes off as though they forgot they wrote her as completely evil in the beginning

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Everyone does terrible things in the show except for Lucy, which includes the two other protagonists.
            Kinda the point.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              This is a complete understatement of what Muldaver did. Lucy and somehow Maximus haven't done anything half as bad as Muldaver

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Betraying your order and killing your sworn brothers is worse than destroying a base that is run by and serves your sworn enemies.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Moldaver unironically didn't do anything wrong, except in Lucy's eyes. The whole point of her taking Lucy's father is because he's the butthole who nuked Shady Sands. Vault-Tec are buttholes and 32-33 are basically breeding grounds for the Vault-Tec scum from 31.

                The question you should be asking is how Moldaver is alive 200 years later looking exactly the same.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Probably was frozen like Lucy's father.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Moldaver unironically didn't do anything wrong
                Killing the people in the vault wasn't wrong? Just because you are a Vault-dweller, doesn't mean you agree with Vault-Tec and Lucy's father. These a people who literally don't know what Vault-Tec is doing.
                Do you believe that during WW2 it would have been morally right to execute any German citizen? Just because you live under a regime doesn't mean you support it.

                She had her beef with the father and Vault-Tec, not the vault dwellers. There was no good reason for her to kill. She could've immediately taken him hostage the moment the Vault door was open.
                We had them sit down and do all those festivities because the show wanted a delayed reveal of them not actually being from the neighbouring vault.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Story starts off withholding information about a villain character and then reveals it near the end
            Woah, I knew Mauler was a fricking moron but I didn't think he was that fricking stupid.
            When he says "sympathetic", what it means he didn't like the revelations regarding her character. Moldaver's plan to essentially rebuild society is hardly new for a villain in the Fallout universe. Even if it was in the form of unlimited energy, it's pretty typical. There are many characters whose moral actions are grey. Like Fallout New Vegas, which has a lot of morally grey and fricked up characters. But Moldaver's actions, killing Vault 33 and essentially being a tyrant are not in a vacuum, they are fricked up and the show doesn't shy away from that. But her actions being brutal and draconian while her intentions are for rebuilding society is the kind of shit that Fallout villains do.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              starts off withholding information about a villain character and then reveals it near the end
              That is not what happened. The show gave two contradictory versions of the character, I think you are misinterpreting because you are going off my post alone, Mauler goes into much more detail in the video. You can just watch that section if you need to as I'm not going to summarize everything in a video for you.
              It is early in the video and if you are too worried for your time you can watch it at 2* speed.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >That is not what happened. The show gave two contradictory versions of the character
                Yeah it is.
                Moldaver was revealed at first to be a brutal tyrant and a monster until it's revealed she had ulterior motives that was for the benefit of mankind. That's a plot and character revelation, in which you learn new information regarding a character or the plot that changes the dynamics of the story and the world. Literally, storytelling 101. As well as very typical of Fallout villains to be structured like that, like how in Fallout 4, the evil synethics were actually created by your character's son, or the various factions of New Vegas like Caesar who has a philosophy behind his brutality.
                The fact that fricking morons like you and Mauler can't even figure that out and unironically try to say that it's contradictory reveals how little he actually understands the medium he profits off by acting like he's some deep diving analyst who has to waste ten hours of your life to sperg out.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >she had ulterior motives that was for the benefit of mankind
                Still doesn't justify killing the vault-dwellers.
                It easily could've been bloodless.
                This isn't what a morally grey character is. If her killing the vault-dwellers was necessary to her plan for humanity, yes, but it wasn't.
                It was needless and got her own men killed.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If anything she should have gone harder. Destroy the vaults, kill anyone who resisted and exile the rest. Leaving them in peace after taking Hank makes no sense, those vaults a threat to anyone who lives topside, the next overseer will surely nuke whatever settlement she can build with cold fusion.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Still doesn't justify killing the vault-dwellers.
                >It easily could've been bloodless.
                >This isn't what a morally grey character is. If her killing the vault-dwellers was necessary to her plan for humanity, yes, but it wasn't.
                >It was needless and got her own men killed.
                Because she's still a fricked up and brutal b***h, kek
                That why she still ends up dying despite essentially bringing mankind one step closer to restoring civilization. Her methods were brutal and her disregard for the people in the Vaults evident, but she's doing it for a cause to "save" humanity. The point of that isn't to make her sympathetic or agree with her, it's showing the extent people go to compromise their moral integrity for the "greater good." It's an "ends justify the means" sort of villain, which again is very common in Fallout. The fact Mauler is so pissed off at that is because he sees her actions at the beginning of the show as to reprehensible, but show isn't telling us to agree with her. It's to show that people are fricked even if they have a righteous cause.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're ignoring the part where her own methods disregarded her own men.

                >but show isn't telling us to agree with her
                I agree, but the show is trying to get us to sympathise.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can completely dismantle it with like 5 30 second webms.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    FOUR HOURS?!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You have to buy an ad to shill your literal-who, anon.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    can someone give tldw?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >fat autist goes full autistic for 10 hours

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not that knowledgeable with vidya culture but can someone explain to me why is fallout franchise so widely popular despite the fact the games are all buggy messes that sometimes dont even work as advertised (Fallout 3 on steam)
    There are better rpg titles out there, what makes this one stand out?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bethesdrones have got to be the most moronic group of people.
      They don't accept any critique thus why this dogshit show is being protected from any rightful critique

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bethesda makes, or used to at least, fun playgrounds to explore and lose yourself in, and thanks to creation engine being easy to mod, its always getting new content

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fallout 1 & 2 are important and accessible crpgs. 3, nv, and 4 are all popular and accessible console rpgs. They're all pretty bad but the setting is interesting enough to look past the many problems

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Excellent world building, and starting with Fallout 3 because the engine they use makes them highly moddable so the games developed a huge modder base (which also extends to Skyrim).

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Mods fix the games and more.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't this guy make a 4 hour response video to Jenny Nicholson? I hope he was rewarded with sex.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You don't get it do you chud if you turn your brain off and up your prime subby you WILL enjoy the slop. Let people enjoy things. Let people resist the system in a way that makes them comfortable. And get fricking laid loser.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    sage

    >sitting around for 2 and half hours listening to some random c**ts opinion on a tv show
    lol fricking gay

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This character is shown to hate the protag but then suddenly professes her love for him in private. This is a logical inconsistency and a huge plot hole.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The coolest part was when the brotherhood who always walk around in their armor draining the fusion cores for some reason went into battle without weapons so cool and biggerer and betterer than the last one punch kick stomp punch kick stomp we are we are prime subs

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I love how everybody still misses the point of power armor, their main purpose is to give people extra strength to carry big guns and ammo, not to walk around hitting walls like MCU tard

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        BUT DEY FLY NAO

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >45lb nuclear powered exosuit forces its wearers to swing around glacially like medieval knights stuck in mud due to its uhhhhh incredible cumbersome nature never before felt until Fallout 4
        >is also a featherweight easily capable of funny balloon physics
        so funny saars, just like wild wasteland 🙂

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >we want the avengers audience

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I fricking hate Marvel so fricking much, every single sci-fi or fantasy action/adventure movie now HAS to have reddit humor shit every five min and EVERY action scene needs to be "le wacky" and ruin any sort of tension or excitment.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          this webm does more to convince me that the show is shit than some long, drawn out video ever could

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          dey fly noaw?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          <shoot weak spot at point blank range
          >does nothing

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The BoS patrol the wasteland doing huge distances in the suits. The power cores have near endless energy.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I feel like these hate essays are getting more and more moronic as everyone is rushing to the grift.

    I saw the last Critical Drinker video about some crap scifi movie I never heard about and he goes
    >Are you telling me that a technologically advanced future civilisation still has feudalism? *fart noise*

    Like this guy never heard of Dune or WH40k now?

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >make a fallout TV show
    >but instead about making about Fallout 1 (Vault 13, Water Chip, The Master.. etc) they make it about some imaginary bullshit about vault-tec being le evil corpo and muh BoS being everywhere
    Why

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I prefer a new story over rehashing an existing one. I dropped the last of us after 1 episode because it was 1:1 the game I played

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ok that's fine, just make sure to include the "inspired by the fallout franchise" and "not canon" in the credits

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's too late to worry about canon after FO3.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't want to actually watch the video games. I can play those.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll just replay Fallout 2 or New Vegas. Why should I bother with an inferior product made by inferior people for an inferior medium?

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >MauLer

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Let's see a picture of you now.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sure

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i see why he decided to become a v-tuber. disparu sadly didn't get the memo.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Frankie MacDonald if he close mouth

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >show catered to weed smoking normies is cheap and dumb
    shocking

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This would be fine if people admitted that. but we have morons claiming it is a good show and is how adaptations should be.

      >And wasn't the argument that the robot was programmed?
      It's a robot capable of human speech. There's no reason it can't be programmed using human speech.

      Ok so I repeat again, if they could go "Dude, harvest organs for us" why can't they go "Dude, we don't need the fingers"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Ok so I repeat again, if they could go "Dude, harvest organs for us" why can't they go "Dude, we don't need the fingers"
        I don't even follow what "Dude, we don't need the fingers" is supposed to accomplish. The robot didn't harvest Lucy's fingers.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They have a box full of fingers which is apparently for giving people their fingers back. I should've been more clear and said "Dude, you don't need to heal people that we are about to harvest"

          >morons
          yes morons are going to moron they're probably brown and smoke weed and think they're epic haxor because they know how to work a smart tv and make an amazon account

          What are you even saying

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And then someone injured comes in that they want to put into the cells to harvest later and they go "Dude, what are you doing? Heal her so she doesn't die before we harvest her" and the robot is all confused.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Are you forgetting that the robot first took Lucy to them to confirm before he started try dissect her.

              >Heal her so she doesn't die before we harvest her
              And why would they care whether or not the person is alive. moron, a person doesn't need to be alive so you can harvest their organs.
              So are you or the characters stupid?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Are you forgetting that the robot first took Lucy to them to confirm before he started try dissect her.
                So? It's still filled with lots of conflicting commands it got during its time. Which will confuse a demented old robot.

                >And why would they care whether or not the person is alive.
                To keep the organs alive and fresh until they need them?
                They had living people in cells.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >To keep the organs alive and fresh until they need them?
                >They had living people in cells.
                Those were ghouls and were clearly for a different purpose. They wanted her organs because she was human. If they wanted their organs we wouldn't have seen them alive.

                >It's still filled with lots of conflicting commands it got during its time. Which will confuse a demented old robot.
                Holy frick, you'll make anything up as long as you defend the show. This doesn't even counter the point I made.
                The robot clearly knows its job. It is nearly sentient. You agree that the it can adapt and change. But not that it will ever be competent after it has done this job several times

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >morons
        yes morons are going to moron they're probably brown and smoke weed and think they're epic haxor because they know how to work a smart tv and make an amazon account

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wtf bros they made a logically inconsistent show out of a logically inconsistent game????

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Haven't seen the show but you can Mauler's standards around on anything he likes. The constant cutting to smart guy from Game of Thrones and Avengers looking annoyed is dumb and indicative of how smart he thinks he is because he doesn't like some mainstream garbage

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I stop watching any YouTuber who inserts stupid Avengers twitter memes in his videos.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he genuinely believes the MCU is the peak of storytelling (he keeps comparing everything to it) so you can't take his opinion seriously on anything

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >he genuinely believes the MCU is the peak of storytelling
        no he doesn't lmao

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >In two hours and 30 minutes MauLer completely dismantles Fallout
    I don't think so. This BNWO kino is cash.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Autism. No wonder our regular capeshitslopers love him.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Her part is only two hours of that video, it's mostly Jeb jokes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      isn't his response the audio-visual form of the wall of text leftist meme?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >12hrs
      That guy is even more autistic than Jenny is... and she's STILL right about the movie in the end.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Is Jenny's sister a troon I've seen her hulking figure in some of her videos

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I was enjoying the show well enough, and then it got to the last episode where its revelaed that Vault Tec is the one that nuked the world and I completely lost all interest. Stupid, nonsensical, needless le epic twist!

    Also, I noticed that this show is cucked by China just like all of hollywood and never once mentions them in the show, its always just "the reds" and theres even a scene with a down soviet satallite in the middle of the desert with CCCP on it.

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can one of you nerds explain something to me, how does Fallout 3 even happen? I havent played it since I was a teenager, but how is it set in D.C.? There are still building up and you can see the Washington Monument ect. but wouldnt this be a main target in a nuclear strike, meaning that the entire city would be leveled by a nuclear blast?

    Is this ever explained or is it just stupidly written and youre not meant to think about this?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Outside of the epicenter there would be ruins of buildings still standing much like seen in Japan at the end of WW2.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Outside of the epicenter
        You go into the actual city and all the famous monuments and buildings like the washington monument and the capital building are all still standing with only signs of decay from neglect. The city is completely untouched by nuclear attack.

        Is the logic that the bomb in the middle of that first city was meant to be the bomb for D.C. but it was a dud which is why the city is unfazed?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know maybe. It's a videogame with mutants and monsters it's not supposed to be realistic.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >its fantasy/sci fi so nothing has to make sense!
            moron

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Shut the frick up, the mutants in Fallout 1, 2 and NV were written with such nuance and character, they aren't just a bunch of fricking orcs, they're horribly disfigured and mentally moronic humans who are trying to find a place in the wasteland after their ideology completely crumbled. This is what real creative writing, coming up with the most fantastical concepts and grounding them in reality as much as possible. The mutants in Fallout 1 and 2 feel more real than a single character in the show.

              The video games treat radiation like magic.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How? Do people cast spells with radiation or do they mutate like in every other peice of sci fi media in existence? You fricking moron, this is an established trope of the genre you're talking about.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hes a moronic redditor who actually made the "its sci-fi so nothing has to make sense" argument.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Actually scifi is supposed to make sense which is the point. Video games unfortunately are always a shit medium for storytelling and always have a hard time making logical sense.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No dipshit, Fallout maybe unrelistic but what makes it feel real is the people and characters in the world, the people in Fallout and how they react, try to rebuild society, how the factions interact with one another, all of this serves to make the people and characters the most relistic part of Fallout, which is by far the most important aspect of any story. If your characters suck shit and are boring it doesn't matter how relistic or unrelistic the setting is, this is bottomline why the show fricking shit, the characters suck.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >science FICTION is supposed to make sense
                Somebody fricking shoot this moron, please.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >science FICTION is supposed to make sense
                Somebody fricking shoot this moron, please.

                The duality of Cinemaphile

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Do people cast spells with radiation
                Yes.
                https://fallout.fandom.com/wiki/Psyker

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Somehow I knew you were going to post Psykers like you even know what the frick they are, Phsyhcis aren't magicians or wizards by the way, frick face. Is the oracle from the matrix using magic spells, because she's a witch, or is she psychic because she can see the future. Not only that but this ailment isn't caused by radiation, it's not an FEV mutation it's completely random and extremely rare, there's only 1 kid psyker in NV and he's pretty easy to miss.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm NTA you were originally arguing with I just posted that to be funny I agree with you though

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Shut the frick up, the mutants in Fallout 1, 2 and NV were written with such nuance and character, they aren't just a bunch of fricking orcs, they're horribly disfigured and mentally moronic humans who are trying to find a place in the wasteland after their ideology completely crumbled. This is what real creative writing, coming up with the most fantastical concepts and grounding them in reality as much as possible. The mutants in Fallout 1 and 2 feel more real than a single character in the show.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Sorry, they're actually just orcs now. Did you play Fallout 4? That's Fallout now!

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Never heard of it, not ever going to, have a nice day

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >OP posts his own autistic 3 hour video rant
    >proceeds to autistically rant to defend it for another 6 hours

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He had to watch the series to make the review. He played himself.

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    DUDE LOOK AT THIS! ITS A HORRIBLY COORIOGRAPHED FIGHT SCENE, IN SLOW MOTION, WITH A LE EPIC 1950S SONG!

    Im so glad this happens at least 5 times an episode because it never ever gets old

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Frick this fat moron watch this guy's review instead, he just lists off every plothole and example of lazy writing in around 40 minutes while only talking about the original fallouts minimally. Yes the show is that fricked on its own merits.

    ?feature=shared

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All of these guys have fat voices, disgusting.

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    frick off yougay shill

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >NCR is an entire nation of many large towns with populations in the thousands, some tens of thousands
    >capitol (not in the right place btw) gets nuked by some guy and the entire nation is nowhere to be seen
    Todd fallout HATES civilization in any form and NEEDS everything to still be like 10 years after the bombs dropped for it to work

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does this guy like anything holy shit. Never encountered a more miserable sperg in my life. Been putting out multiple hour long essays on why literally anything popular and new sucks for YEARS. This homie needs a life

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well to be fair most movies/tv shows made recently are really horrible slop. Competency crises.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >does this guy like anything????

      Yes!
      But you don't know that,..
      Because you haven't checked out anything else...
      ...which means you don't know anything.
      But you commented!
      Which means you actively know and admit you know you don't know something, but still express an opinion instead of finding an answer.

      Are you a writer from this show?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah he likes a lot things actually. in fact, at the end of this fallout video he mentions some shows he'd recommend over it

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Has he managed to start watching stuff without superheroes or laser beams in it yet?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yeah

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh yeah, I love when he considered this Oscar bait crap the greatest film of all time.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Do not watch this. If you're looking for something new, watch The Gentleman, Shogun, or Silo.
      >Or hell, watch paint dry.

      Did you even put his video on in the background while you were trying to make a dent in saving the 10000 tabs of porn you keep putting off downloading?

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >MauLer
    Nah.

    I'll wait for a good leftist criticism of Fallout as a tv show.

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For my own sanity i assume any video essay watcher here is trolling.

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >makes youtube criticism video that's longer than the show or movie
    Who in the frick watches this shit, do you think you're making some kind of moronic statement by not watching some movie and then talking shit about it obsessively instead for 10h straight?
    Just call it gay and moronic and move on.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But my identity revolves around being a hater

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't understand why this fat homosexual needs to make his videos hours long when other people can give you every reason under the sun as to why the show sucks in 20-40 minutes or in a few Cinemaphile posts. The show sucks ass but there's videos out there that can tell you why AND respect your time as an audience member.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >He needs to be told his opinion by YouTubers

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Who cares? If their arguments make sense and are well resoned then I'd be a petty little b***h to deny their arguments just because they have a youtube channel. They at least bring more to the table than your homosexual ass that much is true.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >They at least bring more to the table than your homosexual ass that much is true.
            So all I have to do is start a YouTube channel and I'll bring plenty to the table for you?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No you have to come up with a semblence of an argument and stop acting like a passive aggresive little homosexual.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Present an argument
                >Anon disagrees and tells me my opinion would be more valuable if I presented it on a YouTube channel.
                Probably you were watching something that an algorithm recommended to you or you follow someone who you know will share opinions that support your own views.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >>Anon disagrees and tells me my opinion would be more valuable if I presented it on a YouTube channel.
                That isn't what I said, stop arguing with yourself, coward.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Who are some YouTubers you follow who you disagree with regularly? You dont follow people who you know you will agree with do you?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not answering that moronic question it has nothing to do with the point you're supposedly arguing against.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It may not seem like it but making hours long videos of endless rambling with minimal edits is far easier than making a properly writte, articulated, and edited 20-30 minute video. I bet Mauler's biggest challenge when making his videos is just waiting for them to render while he has a one man hot pocket eating contest.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        have you ever tried making either kind of video

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No I sell my video editing skills to businesses and other clients because I make actual money, my time is worth far more than a shitty youtube video.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            oh shit bro
            how much you make with your sick editing skillz

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The irony of your statement is that videos which pull Mauler's typical viewcount will earn more than what your gigs do.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >my husbando is rich, I tell ya!
              Cool beans.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              oh shit bro
              how much you make with your sick editing skillz

              Always love it when poorgays instantly dig their heels in and seethe at even the implication of someone else's financial success.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i'm not a chicken you're a turkey

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I'll show these guys I'm right by saying I have an income
                >My income is actually less than the guy I'm comparing my income to
                >Uhh, I'll just say you guys are poor instead!
                You're own contrived metric for being right is betraying you and you're still sticking to it. This is beyond braindead.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >>My income is actually less than the guy I'm comparing my income to
                You have no idea what my income is, this is pure cope on your part.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If your income is not disclosable, then it is not usable as a source of credibility for you being correct.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Correct about what? The money I make was never a subject of the argument to begin with. It's about Mauler being a lazy boring homosexual.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Backtracking. Refocusing. Your position of credibility for attacking the editing and pacing of the video was chosen by yourself. If that position is found wanting, then you'll have you provide something akin to actual reasoning and logic. If you can't actually do this at the moment because you haven't watched it, you automatically lose your credibility before you've started. You'd just be some guy pissing in the wind.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Credibility is only if you make a frick ton of money
                Mauler and his fan are the worst kinds of pretentious homosexuals on Film YouTube.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Poor people tend to seethe at people with money, it's not rocket science.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You're own contrived metric for being right
                About what though? Were you even paying attention? Someone asked if I ever made a youtube video like that and I responded with no it's not worth it to me. Someone asked a question and I responded, that's it, then people started crying because i mentioned I make money. The argument is supposed to be about how lazy Mauler is because he refuses to edit his videos and poorf read his scripts thus making his videos a fricking chore to watch. Read homie, READ

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well that's just disproven by the sheer number of cuts in the mauler video alone. He matches what he's talking about to what's being shown of the show, and splices in examples of other shows to make points or be humorous. Furthermore I consider a 2.5 hour video of an 8 episode show to be a fair amount of time to go into the characters, plot, world building and such. Each part got as much time as was needed to cover it. The only way to shave down the time would be to make the video exclusively for people who've seen the show already and don't need the context for every point.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I just had a 12 hour long shift with absolutely nothing to do, so I spent all of it watching youtube while checking Cinemaphile, and Cinemaphile periodically for more internet drama.

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mauler is fricking based. My favourite movie connaisseur together with Nerdotic and the drinked

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mauler has made more than 100k from his star wars videos. Disney's star wars has bring him more gains than to disney itself.

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I won't watch this video or the Fallout show.

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    gay show

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >mauler

  49. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So, have the showrunners finally explained why Shady Sands teleported 200 miles south and why the entirety of NCR just disappeared over night?

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >new Mauler just dropped
    >two hours and thirty minutes
    Well I already know what I'll be watching later (in separate viewing blocks), I just can't help myself. I've already written off the show as something I don't have an interest in watching anyway.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >mmm, 2 hours of goyslop??? Yowza!!!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        seethe

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There are better critiques than this.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >smug avater with crossed arms
      I will not watch your video

  52. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fallout 1 & 2 couldn't decide where Shady sands was located. What's your point?

    >AHHHH MUH HECKING NEW VEGAS AHHHHH

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stop regurgitating things you know nothing about and only heard on Cinemaphile. Shady Sands didn't change the location in FO2, people only think so, beacuse of map compression. It's where it should be, right to it's location in relation to other places like the Vaults.

  53. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would anyone expect the Fallout show to be good? The Bethesda games aren't even good. Bethesda has never made a well written Fallout game and is incapable of ever doing so. They're fun to play though.

  54. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who?

  55. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    MauLer autistically screeching for 2hrs about a mid tv show based on a video game series he never played... yeah I'll pass.

  56. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you actually enjoyed the Fallout show or thought it was well written, you should be euthanized.

  57. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >video on the last ant man movie is almost six hours long
    >four videos totalling over 12 hours for force awakens
    jesus christ who watches this shit?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Autistic morons.

  58. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So Moldavar is a synth?

  59. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This show is worse than Marvel tier dogshit, are people really so fooled by nostalgia and brand recognition? You can’t just make a show that doesn’t make any fricking sense and write off all criticisms with “muh video game logic” and “muh satire”. Can’t wait for all the braindead TV execs to latch onto these get out of jail free cards for the next 10 years, as we’re subject to more and more of this crap.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      From the writer s that wrote Captain Marvel and the Tomb Raider movies

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Agreed. This show is just average slop. Idk why it's so fricking hyped up

  60. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He's a bit of a gay welshman

  61. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    didn't him and his group of severely autistic friends (the green plague doctor one can't help but quote entire Simpsons jokes in a really bad fake American accent and irregular tempo to the detriment of the conversation) spend 12 hours going after Jenny Nicholson on her Joker video?

    Also, does Jenny have a troony sibling?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >him
      he* sorry

  62. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you need some Eceleb to analyze slop for 2 and a half hours straight to tell you what you should think, you have brain damage.
    Or as the zoomies like to call it (which you are on the exact same level as mentally):

    Brain

    rot

  63. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think the 11 hour vid is memed on too much. It's just 11 hours of talking it's like a podcast, not a real video. It's still a bit comically long, but it's not like that guy that posted a 20 hour skyrim video essay that was actually scripted and structured.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >just 11 hours of talking

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Skyrim is a video game that you can play for hundreds of hours, it's easy to find a lot of things to talk about with it.
      Mauler is doing 10 hour video about 2 hour long movies, he's completely mentally insane.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This one was a 2 1/2 hour video about a nearly 8 hour show, which I think is reasonable. He repeats himself a decent amount during it too so it could probably be 2 hours. I haven't watched his 5 hour ones about marvel slop and I don't remember anything about the star wars ones so I can't say how autistic they are.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *