>With the way they're trying to evolve this stuff, AI soon won't need human input.
Thats nice, dear, but Humans learning to use AI in conjunction with their own higher-order thinking skills will still create a work product of higher quality than anything created by only AI. There will always be a market for things made by Humans.
Petit bourgeois western artists are obsessed with the sanctity of their intellectual property and terrified they’ll have to get real jobs. They could benefit from being sent to the mines for a few years to see what kind of problems normal people worry about
NO! AI CAN'T REPLACE ME! I need to create stunning masterpieces for Mr. Shekelstein at his studio! He needs that money while I complain that I am being underpaid, uncredited, and exploited! Machines can't replace what I do!
Okay, I need to ask about this hypothesis; >AI that is fed off itself (like making two AIs talk to each other) doesn't actually learn anything new and basically goes nowhere/eats itself alive. >There's a logarithmic increase in all kinds of content made with AI. >New AI updates rely on scraping content online. >People who make completely original works/discoveries paywall/opt out to prevent being scraped by AI software, more people do it as word spreads/companies promote the option.
Therefore: >Eventually future AI software ends up scraping from mostly AI made content and doesn't scrape knew knowledge or content. >Thus, future AI doesn't actually learn anything new and ends up plateauing in capabilities. >Or perhaps even begins to get dumber.
Is there a flaw in this logic?
>youtube screencap
Go back there and then have a nice day when you get there, you outragehomosexualry addicted subhuman.
Everyone else, report the OP for violating
Imagine saying people should be blacklisted for using photoshop. That's how insane anti-AI people are.
People should be blacklisted for giving Adobe money, yes.
He's only half right.
Humans using AI will dominate art.
Not for long. With the way they're trying to evolve this stuff, AI soon won't need human input.
>With the way they're trying to evolve this stuff, AI soon won't need human input.
Thats nice, dear, but Humans learning to use AI in conjunction with their own higher-order thinking skills will still create a work product of higher quality than anything created by only AI. There will always be a market for things made by Humans.
it will definitely take over the animation industry, anime included. it's cheaper than paying sweatshop animation studios.
All rule 34 will just be AI generated.
I can go through pages of ai porn of characters i like and none of it turns me on, the human mind is wired to reject ai art.
>Hey what's going on big guy? We're just here to make you smile.
He says nothing of the sort in the actual video
It already dominated Asian art. The west has more resistance.
It's over for meatbags
Petit bourgeois western artists are obsessed with the sanctity of their intellectual property and terrified they’ll have to get real jobs. They could benefit from being sent to the mines for a few years to see what kind of problems normal people worry about
Going into the mines and mining is what normal people worry about, gotcha.
Sounds like someone failed to get into art school
>and terrified they’ll have to get real jobs.
Artists already work multiple jobs. Why are you on Cinemaphile?
NO! AI CAN'T REPLACE ME! I need to create stunning masterpieces for Mr. Shekelstein at his studio! He needs that money while I complain that I am being underpaid, uncredited, and exploited! Machines can't replace what I do!
Okay, I need to ask about this hypothesis;
>AI that is fed off itself (like making two AIs talk to each other) doesn't actually learn anything new and basically goes nowhere/eats itself alive.
>There's a logarithmic increase in all kinds of content made with AI.
>New AI updates rely on scraping content online.
>People who make completely original works/discoveries paywall/opt out to prevent being scraped by AI software, more people do it as word spreads/companies promote the option.
Therefore:
>Eventually future AI software ends up scraping from mostly AI made content and doesn't scrape knew knowledge or content.
>Thus, future AI doesn't actually learn anything new and ends up plateauing in capabilities.
>Or perhaps even begins to get dumber.
Is there a flaw in this logic?
AI will scrape directly from brain chips
is it me or is hadel sounding dumber the more you hear what he actually thinks
i don't think zach ever claimed to be an intelligent man.
you should have seen all the moronic political shit he used to post pre 2016 until he nuked all his old tweets
>youtube screencap
Go back there and then have a nice day when you get there, you outragehomosexualry addicted subhuman.
Everyone else, report the OP for violating
and arguably
https://sys.Cinemaphile.org/co/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=144190797
Once AI starts perfecting lewd shit then I'd start worrying.
>Getting mad for things I've never said
erm that's what we call unbased...
buy an ad
isn't this the guy who is friends with shadman