surprised it hasn't been used more often.
against Superpowers I understand, but who cares if some backwater country disappears from the map?
the frick are they going to do?
Stop being dumb. It's not just an "extra large bomb". This shit kicks up tons of dust that is now radioactive and spreads it everywhere. And its effects last for decades. Somewhere completely unrelated will have contaminated groundwater/surface and elevated cancers for a long time
No. Journos and writers vastly overestimate the capability of nuclear warheads. That's because of the paranoia created during the cold war. Now everyone believe a couple nukes would turn earth into a radioactive wasteland.
The radioactive contamination wouldn't even travel that far around the impact site. It could seep into the water table but if you're in the mountains that is a nonexistent worry.
the air carries it. just the two bombs in japan fricked up carbon dating methods used by anthropologists WORLDWIDE
>Cinemaphile losers have gotten so contrarian that their position is now that nuclear weapons aren't a big deal
this is part of the package deal that comes with the youtube algorithm. they start with fake moon landing conspiracies, then its "the illuminati and free masons altered our perception of time so that we think we're in 2022 but really we're 900 years behind" and shortly after that it's all "nukes are a world-wide conspiracy designed to keep people in a state of micro-anxiety so they'll remain compliant and do what we want when we finally lift the curtain and reveal the ***GREAT RESET***"
there are some interesting research papers about this, but ultimately we're going to have a problem in the near future where a good percentage of the population throws in the intellectual towel and decides to dismantle academic institutions on the basis of fear and insecurity. posters like
nukes dont exist and are just psywar. its why they didnt let macarthur drop 40 of them on china before anybody supposedly had them.
dont understand the concept of nuclear energy, and so when they attempt to read up on it they get confused and angry because to them its indecipherable. and then they start to let other thoughts creep in, things like "maybe they're lying about it" and this strokes the ego, because now "maybe im not confused, maybe its all just a lie!" and that makes their dopamine spike, they are relieved because they're not so fricking dumb after all.
i feel sorry for them tbh. but it does make them feel important in their otherwise unimportant lives, which probably keeps them from seeking that elsewhere in maybe violent or perverted ways. this way they're just a nuisance online with their bullshit confirmation bias.
tbh we don't actually know what nuclear war looks like, since we've never had one. A full-scale exchange like in the movie could well be that bad, but that's a bit of an assumption
nice cope nukeBlack person. your favorite weapon is just overhyped dynamite. overpriced too
1 year ago
Anonymous
Sure, but a big ass explosion is still a big ass explosion. If it's enough to do major damage to power, communications, agriculture, roads + transit, national + regional government facilities and housing then it's going to severely frick your country up for a long time even without everyone getting cancer
>Just deal with radiated territory for five years bro!! It's nothing!!
Left is Hiroshima after getting nuked. Right is 4 years later. Radiation isn't real it can't fricking hurt you.
the two bombs dropped were u-235, not plutonium. Thermonuclear bombs get used, those big badass megatonnage hydrogen bombs and humanity's kids forever more, if they an breed at all, are gonna be wienereyed
Also, you are moronic, and even if we don't mass suicide with nuclear war, you should sterilize just so your moronation doesn't make it any further. Think of the future kids, anon, do the needful and cut your balls off.
>they arnt a big deal
They absolutely are >they are super duper sci fi weapons that have huge radius and ignite the atmosphere and leave radiation for generations
Lol no
the nuclear winter in the film doesn't last for very long, in most of the post-bomb scenes they're dealing with a nuclear summer that's causing high rates of tumours and cataracts
>when someone states the truth I think they’re stupid because I’m that ignorant
The absolute state of you. Post a reputable sauce that says nuclear winter is real. I dare you.
Nuclear winter doesn't follow a single nuke, moron. Of course there's no valid evidence of it. It's a logical hypothesis in the event that multiple nukes were deployed.
But to call it propaganda is just straight up moronic.
nukes dont exist and are just psywar. its why they didnt let macarthur drop 40 of them on china before anybody supposedly had them.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Ok schizo
1 year ago
Anonymous
>we have le wunderwaffe superweapon and are usint it to psywar everybody into sucking our dicks >nobody else has them >macarthur wants to drop 40 of them on china >churchhill wants to carpet-bomb russia with them
b-but we cant do that... b-because we just cant, okay?!
>admits defeat
Thank you.
No, the paper which put the nuclear winter hypothesis was funded by communists. It decided on its answer and worked backwards from there. The end result was a model used that was deeply flawed. In this model the majority of the earth’s landmass was assumed to be arid desert. It was also assumed that both sides would use all their nukes and target pretty much the entire globe. Lastly it was assumed that every nuke in the arsenal was far larger than in reality.
So no, it is not a “logical assumption.” Yes, it is fiction and yes, it is fiction that exists solely to propagandise and reduce the west’s will to fight. Even wikipedia acknowledges it is fiction.
Maybe in future if you know next to nothing about a topic you shouldn’t arrogantly call those better informed than you stupid, and shouldn’t wear your ignorance as a badge of prize. In fact, maybe you should just kys
1 year ago
Anonymous
Badge of pride*
1 year ago
Anonymous
I did no such thing you disingenuous schizophrenic c**t. Go frick yourself.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>accepts defeat a second time
How gracious of you. A thank you for educating you would be appropriate too.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>has to inaccurately say his opponent accepted defeat twice in order to make himself better
Weak, stupid gaping vegana.
1 year ago
Anonymous
You did though? You admitted you couldn’t provide a reputable sauce for your claim that nuclear winter was real, before going on to mischaracterise the nuclear winter hypothesis as a valid logical conclusion with no indications of being propaganda. If either of us is being disingenuous it’s you, or maybe you’re just spectacularly ignorant?
1 year ago
Anonymous
>something has never happened, therefore it's not real
Is this really supposed to be a gotcha here? Do you feel clever right now?
There's a difference between hypothesis (which you are conveniently backpedaling to as a term) and a myth.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>strawmanning
Oh dear, you’ve sunk that far already. No where have I claimed “because nuclear winter hasn’t occurred it can’t”. The myth of nuclear winter is derived from a hypothesis for which the only evidence is a deeply flawed model funded by communist money. I’ve not back-pedalled at all.
Now, post a reputable sauce. I know, it’s hard when you can’t use wikipedia as your starting point as you try to frantically search for a valid citation.
1 year ago
Anonymous
> The myth
There you go again. Pure moronation. >l funded by communist money
TOP KEK. Take a wild guess who else was funded by such money. The answer may surprise you. >post a reputable sauce
Post a reputable sauce that Nuclear Winter is impossible first. >it's le propaganda to keep the west from le rising up xD
As if Nuclear Winter is holding back anyone from using Nukes, and not the Nukes on their own. moron.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>no argument >abandonment of core scientific principles >seething
I am under no obligation to prove a negative, particularly when you have offered zero proof other than hrt induced rage. However, for the benefit of third parties who are interested I shall: > "on scientific grounds the global apocalyptic conclusions of the initial nuclear winter hypothesis can now be relegated to a vanishing low level of probability."
http://www.oism.org/nwss/ >vegetation won’t contribute significantly to soot
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.31822020694212
https://doi.org/10.1080%2F00102208708952566 >urban areas won’t produce as much soot as the flawed model suggests
http://hpschapters.org/sections/homeland/documents/Planning_Guidance_for_Response_to_a_Nuclear_Detonation-2nd_Edition_FINAL.pdf >even when primarily made of wood
https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/effects/eonw_7.pdf > Russell Seitz, Associate of the Harvard University Center for International Affairs, argues that the winter models' assumptions give results which the researchers want to achieve and is a case of "worst-case analysis run amok".
https://documents.uow.edu.au/~bmartin/pubs/88spp.html
Get rekt, homosexual.
1 year ago
Anonymous
nuclear winter would be the least of people's worries in the event that actual nukes start being deployed en masse
it's literally irrelevant whether it's "real or a myth"
now prove those photos aren't falsified or that the moon and stars in the sky aren't just a bunch of lamps
1 year ago
Anonymous
Nope. It’s your turn to put up or shut up. I graciously answered you question once, when I didn’t have to. So either provide evidence or frick off and dial eight.
Why would I throw away my life fighting in somebody else's country over some one else's problems....when all the people that are my enemies are right here at home
No. This movie overestimates the impact of radiation, and even given that and the bleak, unrealistically, tone, humans are humans. We'd laugh and have fun and work through all of it. The UK returns to industry a few decades after, as it's shown, so, 50 or so years of hardship isn't that bad.
>single nuke detonates over England >Knocks out power for a few weeks >6 months later the only survivors are illiterate peasants dressed in rags and speaking in grunts while working the land by hand
nuke detonates over England
The explicitly say it's a total national strike, there was 1 initial nuke for an EMP strike and then 2 more waves of attacks to take out military and infrastructure targets. They didn't just bomb Yorkshire and call it a day
This webm perfectly captures the absolute state of Western civilization. The White women supporting the destruction of their civilization, the sea lf brown, and the police goons chasing after the White man that has seen his country be destroyed from the inside out (you can see the police yellow jacket at the tail end) in the full vid they chase after him
An analysis of his look is worthwhile. >the flat cap
Used when work is needed to be done outside by all classes >Barbour jacket
Durable and protective, and like the flat cap worn by all classes when shit needs to get done outside. Practical, it is used by those in shooting sports, and in days gone by, on the battlefield. >the well trimmed moustache
A sign of masculinity, virulence and high testosterone. Well groomed it shows it is also tempered by civilisation, in stark contrast to the uncouthness of the barbaric Black savages he opposes.
they're going to target the nuclear silos first to try and take out counterstrike capability, and most of those are in the middle of nowhere by design. there might be fallout that hits the Midwest.
Then I need to "lurk mor" on /misc/? Dumb homosexual gullible boomer
1 year ago
Anonymous
zoomers calling anyone gullible is hilarious
their entire frame of reference for anything is the internet
1 year ago
Anonymous
No you just need to not be a bootlicker for the democrat Establishment or other similarly alligned governments and eat their goyslop and think critically
1 year ago
Anonymous
>I'm a Democrat bootlicker because I believe nukes are a devastating capability, especially in number >I should think critically instead
I think his point is that the West false flagged Nord Stream to start war drums against Russia; just like how Vietnam was started by a false flag. Or how the government basically allowed Pearl Harbor and 911 as an excuse to go to war.
Point is they're trying to psyop you. Also do you actually trust the government, Establishment, elites, whatever?
If Nord Stream was a false flag, it's nowhere near parallel with any of those events, or the Lusitania. Americans have no skin in the game with it either. I believe the government can be deceptive for it's purposes, but a reasonably intelligent and skeptical person can generally suss out the bullshit. Too many people on this site live in a fantasy world however because they've swung too far into absurd skepticism in reaction to the constant noise and lies of the news landscape
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Americans have no skin in the game with it either.
It's conclusively cut away Russia's main leverage over Germany, who have been growing increasingly frustrated over committing economic suicide for the sake of American hegemony and were seeing increasing pressure from the public probably echoed by Russian shillstbf to wind back the sanctions and make a deal for NS2 to be reopened. Now they can't actually make that deal, at least not for the next however-many-months it'll take to repair it (by which point we'll be well past winter so demand for gas won't be as high). Russia's foot has been forced out of the door, and Germany will now have to go back in to America's arms
1 year ago
Anonymous
Sorry, I meant it's not an event that effects/could rile up the American populace. Thanks for the rundown. I hadn't really kept up with the latest on that, only that it would be idiotic for Russians to blow it up. Nor have I really closely looked at the German gas situation. How bad is this winter supposed to be for Germans without Russia's natural gas?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Not him but Germany has already forced factories to close or already scale back production. No idea whether they resolved their coal barge problem. The government have already labelled anyone critical of decades of chronic energy mismanagement as “enemies of the state”.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>decades of chronic energy mismanagement
Because they decomm'd nuclear plants, right?
1 year ago
Anonymous
And planned infrastructure around the idea that there was unlimited gas supply from Russia, that next useless “green” energy wouldn’t cause it own problems and not building more nuclear (long before Fukushima they were dragging their feet on investing more). There’s a delusion in German politics that they can tame the bear, they even have a word for it though it escapes me right now.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>How bad is this winter supposed to be for Germans without Russia's natural gas
Well, before this year's invasion, around 15% of Germany's energy production was from gas power stations. A little more than half of that gas came from Russia, so right away that's a good 7.5% of Germany's energy production compromised.
Then there's the coal, which is another 10% of Germany's grid and, once again, more than half of Germany's coal comes from Russia, so that's 12.5% compromised (plus all the damage that'll do to the steel industry, worsening Germany's ecnomic situation).
Beyond that, there's the knock-on effect of Russia's supply being withdrawn resulting in greater demand for gas and coal from other countries. Now there's more people trying to by Finnish or Qatari gas despite supply remaining constant, so prices are going up rapidly. The result being that they're going to have to spend a frickload of money to plug the gap.
It's not good
1 year ago
Anonymous
Are you sure about those figures? They seem rather low. Also, I’d add the coal logistics problem they face over the summer. Coal was coming into Rotterdam then being stored in depots along rivers and canals. The low rainfall and low volume of water in the waterways means they have a big back log in the supply chain, meaning that while they own a lot of coal it’s in the wrong place. Not sure how that situation has progress over the last 6 weeks.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>They seem rather low.
Germany has been pouring money into renewables for the last 30-odd years, and honestly has really strong hydroelectric and biomass generation. Although there is an extent to which the official numbers for things like solar and wind are being cooked by presuming ideal conditions, so fossil fuels probably are a bit higher than that. Although even with low numbers, that's still 1/8th of German energy production completely fricked
1 year ago
Anonymous
>steel manning Germany’s position
Very based anon. The troons itt could learn from your example. They won’t though
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Americans have no skin in the game
But the Democrats said that Americans must pay more for gas because Putin is diddling in Ukraine. Where's your patriotism chud bigot!!
I was personally looking forward to a based chud revolution across the entire West against the commie israelite NWO.....but I guess I'll settle with fighting government remnants in the wastes
Russia just accepted Belgorod into service, which is equipped with a two megaton cobalt salted semi-autonomous torpedo which creates radioactive tsunamis. Not a big threat but it’s new.
>"we will not send soldiers to Ukraine" >literally 0 Americans sent by their country to Ukraine >the only Americans in Ukraine are volunteers there on their own accord
DAE not wanna go to Ukraine to fight Putinmort?!?!? We should all just give up komr-I mean fellow Americans!
It literally almost happened when Russia stationed a nuclear submarine near Cuba and was minutes away from launching a nuke at America because of a faulty communication
No which is why Nato is pushing Ukraine to take back Crimea which might result in nuclear destruction
surprised it hasn't been used more often.
against Superpowers I understand, but who cares if some backwater country disappears from the map?
the frick are they going to do?
Stop being dumb. It's not just an "extra large bomb". This shit kicks up tons of dust that is now radioactive and spreads it everywhere. And its effects last for decades. Somewhere completely unrelated will have contaminated groundwater/surface and elevated cancers for a long time
No. Journos and writers vastly overestimate the capability of nuclear warheads. That's because of the paranoia created during the cold war. Now everyone believe a couple nukes would turn earth into a radioactive wasteland.
The radioactive contamination wouldn't even travel that far around the impact site. It could seep into the water table but if you're in the mountains that is a nonexistent worry.
>but if you're in the mountains that is a nonexistent worry.
nomadbros we won
Unironically. In the age of nukes nomadic guerrilla super soldiers are far more dangerous than any kind of bomb, ironically
the air carries it. just the two bombs in japan fricked up carbon dating methods used by anthropologists WORLDWIDE
this is part of the package deal that comes with the youtube algorithm. they start with fake moon landing conspiracies, then its "the illuminati and free masons altered our perception of time so that we think we're in 2022 but really we're 900 years behind" and shortly after that it's all "nukes are a world-wide conspiracy designed to keep people in a state of micro-anxiety so they'll remain compliant and do what we want when we finally lift the curtain and reveal the ***GREAT RESET***"
there are some interesting research papers about this, but ultimately we're going to have a problem in the near future where a good percentage of the population throws in the intellectual towel and decides to dismantle academic institutions on the basis of fear and insecurity. posters like
dont understand the concept of nuclear energy, and so when they attempt to read up on it they get confused and angry because to them its indecipherable. and then they start to let other thoughts creep in, things like "maybe they're lying about it" and this strokes the ego, because now "maybe im not confused, maybe its all just a lie!" and that makes their dopamine spike, they are relieved because they're not so fricking dumb after all.
i feel sorry for them tbh. but it does make them feel important in their otherwise unimportant lives, which probably keeps them from seeking that elsewhere in maybe violent or perverted ways. this way they're just a nuisance online with their bullshit confirmation bias.
Only if you live in a NATO country or russia or China. For eveyone else it will be fairly painless.
We will find out soon enough, don't worry. Some of us won't celebrate New Year.
You know the answer to this question is “no” because you’ve made hundreds of thread about this movie. So kys.
tbh we don't actually know what nuclear war looks like, since we've never had one. A full-scale exchange like in the movie could well be that bad, but that's a bit of an assumption
No, we know for a fact it won’t be.
>Cinemaphile losers have gotten so contrarian that their position is now that nuclear weapons aren't a big deal
>t nuclear warheadgay
napalming of tokyo killed more people than a nuke ever could
Holy christ you're moronic. Atomic weapons, sure, but not nuclear
nucular weapons are a joke. not a single place they were dropped on is irradiated after like 5 years
Long term fallout is less of a concern than the collapse of infrastructure due to the raw explosive damage
nice cope nukeBlack person. your favorite weapon is just overhyped dynamite. overpriced too
Sure, but a big ass explosion is still a big ass explosion. If it's enough to do major damage to power, communications, agriculture, roads + transit, national + regional government facilities and housing then it's going to severely frick your country up for a long time even without everyone getting cancer
>Just deal with radiated territory for five years bro!! It's nothing!!
only epicentre of israelite 2km max gets iradiated. the rest will just have big mushrooms
>Just deal with radiated territory for five years bro!! It's nothing!!
Left is Hiroshima after getting nuked. Right is 4 years later. Radiation isn't real it can't fricking hurt you.
>Hiroshima
>Nuked
There's your flaw, moron
Nice. Very impressive.
Lets see Paul Allens nuke.
the two bombs dropped were u-235, not plutonium. Thermonuclear bombs get used, those big badass megatonnage hydrogen bombs and humanity's kids forever more, if they an breed at all, are gonna be wienereyed
Also, you are moronic, and even if we don't mass suicide with nuclear war, you should sterilize just so your moronation doesn't make it any further. Think of the future kids, anon, do the needful and cut your balls off.
>they arnt a big deal
They absolutely are
>they are super duper sci fi weapons that have huge radius and ignite the atmosphere and leave radiation for generations
Lol no
if japs took 2 of em and in this state, it can't be all that bad honestly
Bro that was like 80 years ago, nukes have come a long way since then
that's because they want themselves wiped out, not that I would blame them
Imagine falling for marxist propaganda that was falsified as soon as it was released. Nuclear winter is a myth, kys.
the nuclear winter in the film doesn't last for very long, in most of the post-bomb scenes they're dealing with a nuclear summer that's causing high rates of tumours and cataracts
You might be the dumbest poster I've ever seen
>when someone states the truth I think they’re stupid because I’m that ignorant
The absolute state of you. Post a reputable sauce that says nuclear winter is real. I dare you.
Nuclear winter doesn't follow a single nuke, moron. Of course there's no valid evidence of it. It's a logical hypothesis in the event that multiple nukes were deployed.
But to call it propaganda is just straight up moronic.
nukes dont exist and are just psywar. its why they didnt let macarthur drop 40 of them on china before anybody supposedly had them.
Ok schizo
>we have le wunderwaffe superweapon and are usint it to psywar everybody into sucking our dicks
>nobody else has them
>macarthur wants to drop 40 of them on china
>churchhill wants to carpet-bomb russia with them
b-but we cant do that... b-because we just cant, okay?!
>admits defeat
Thank you.
No, the paper which put the nuclear winter hypothesis was funded by communists. It decided on its answer and worked backwards from there. The end result was a model used that was deeply flawed. In this model the majority of the earth’s landmass was assumed to be arid desert. It was also assumed that both sides would use all their nukes and target pretty much the entire globe. Lastly it was assumed that every nuke in the arsenal was far larger than in reality.
So no, it is not a “logical assumption.” Yes, it is fiction and yes, it is fiction that exists solely to propagandise and reduce the west’s will to fight. Even wikipedia acknowledges it is fiction.
Maybe in future if you know next to nothing about a topic you shouldn’t arrogantly call those better informed than you stupid, and shouldn’t wear your ignorance as a badge of prize. In fact, maybe you should just kys
Badge of pride*
I did no such thing you disingenuous schizophrenic c**t. Go frick yourself.
>accepts defeat a second time
How gracious of you. A thank you for educating you would be appropriate too.
>has to inaccurately say his opponent accepted defeat twice in order to make himself better
Weak, stupid gaping vegana.
You did though? You admitted you couldn’t provide a reputable sauce for your claim that nuclear winter was real, before going on to mischaracterise the nuclear winter hypothesis as a valid logical conclusion with no indications of being propaganda. If either of us is being disingenuous it’s you, or maybe you’re just spectacularly ignorant?
>something has never happened, therefore it's not real
Is this really supposed to be a gotcha here? Do you feel clever right now?
There's a difference between hypothesis (which you are conveniently backpedaling to as a term) and a myth.
>strawmanning
Oh dear, you’ve sunk that far already. No where have I claimed “because nuclear winter hasn’t occurred it can’t”. The myth of nuclear winter is derived from a hypothesis for which the only evidence is a deeply flawed model funded by communist money. I’ve not back-pedalled at all.
Now, post a reputable sauce. I know, it’s hard when you can’t use wikipedia as your starting point as you try to frantically search for a valid citation.
> The myth
There you go again. Pure moronation.
>l funded by communist money
TOP KEK. Take a wild guess who else was funded by such money. The answer may surprise you.
>post a reputable sauce
Post a reputable sauce that Nuclear Winter is impossible first.
>it's le propaganda to keep the west from le rising up xD
As if Nuclear Winter is holding back anyone from using Nukes, and not the Nukes on their own. moron.
>no argument
>abandonment of core scientific principles
>seething
I am under no obligation to prove a negative, particularly when you have offered zero proof other than hrt induced rage. However, for the benefit of third parties who are interested I shall:
> "on scientific grounds the global apocalyptic conclusions of the initial nuclear winter hypothesis can now be relegated to a vanishing low level of probability."
http://www.oism.org/nwss/
>vegetation won’t contribute significantly to soot
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.31822020694212
https://doi.org/10.1080%2F00102208708952566
>urban areas won’t produce as much soot as the flawed model suggests
http://hpschapters.org/sections/homeland/documents/Planning_Guidance_for_Response_to_a_Nuclear_Detonation-2nd_Edition_FINAL.pdf
>even when primarily made of wood
https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/effects/eonw_7.pdf
> Russell Seitz, Associate of the Harvard University Center for International Affairs, argues that the winter models' assumptions give results which the researchers want to achieve and is a case of "worst-case analysis run amok".
https://documents.uow.edu.au/~bmartin/pubs/88spp.html
Get rekt, homosexual.
nuclear winter would be the least of people's worries in the event that actual nukes start being deployed en masse
it's literally irrelevant whether it's "real or a myth"
>no argument
Kek
post evidence the earth isn't flat first
The shadows surrounding lunar eclipses
now prove those photos aren't falsified or that the moon and stars in the sky aren't just a bunch of lamps
Nope. It’s your turn to put up or shut up. I graciously answered you question once, when I didn’t have to. So either provide evidence or frick off and dial eight.
you didn't though
earth is flat
>I lose
I know
>he thinks nukes are real
The funniest thing is that they would all be draft dodgers if they were actually called into action
Why would I throw away my life fighting in somebody else's country over some one else's problems....when all the people that are my enemies are right here at home
is the US government composed of Cinemaphile losers?
because they don't seem to give a shit about it either
they literally aren't. if you're not hit by the nuke nor impacted by the nuke, did a nuke fall? no, dumpass. it didn't. shut the frick up.
No. This movie overestimates the impact of radiation, and even given that and the bleak, unrealistically, tone, humans are humans. We'd laugh and have fun and work through all of it. The UK returns to industry a few decades after, as it's shown, so, 50 or so years of hardship isn't that bad.
nuclear winter has been debunked, Sagan was a fraud who thought he was too famous to have his work peer-reviewed
>Sagan
isnt that some cringy atheist?
No it hasn't you tinfoil hatted mong. Educate yourself.
Not him and yes it has. Repeatedly. have a nice day and do the genepool a favour.
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T DROP A NUCLEAR BOMB ON CIVILIANS THINK OF THE BIPOC!!!!!!!!!!
i need to go back to real life
No, it's obviously fun for the whole family. My friends on Cinemaphile told me.
Has anybody seen Husbantposter lately? I'm getting worried.
>single nuke detonates over England
>Knocks out power for a few weeks
>6 months later the only survivors are illiterate peasants dressed in rags and speaking in grunts while working the land by hand
It was like that before the nuke.
nuke detonates over England
The explicitly say it's a total national strike, there was 1 initial nuke for an EMP strike and then 2 more waves of attacks to take out military and infrastructure targets. They didn't just bomb Yorkshire and call it a day
>They didn't just bomb Yorkshire and call it a day
Should have done this anyway
Well the rapeugees of Britain don't speak English so it makes sense. Or should I say عظیم برطانیہ
This webm perfectly captures the absolute state of Western civilization. The White women supporting the destruction of their civilization, the sea lf brown, and the police goons chasing after the White man that has seen his country be destroyed from the inside out (you can see the police yellow jacket at the tail end) in the full vid they chase after him
An analysis of his look is worthwhile.
>the flat cap
Used when work is needed to be done outside by all classes
>Barbour jacket
Durable and protective, and like the flat cap worn by all classes when shit needs to get done outside. Practical, it is used by those in shooting sports, and in days gone by, on the battlefield.
>the well trimmed moustache
A sign of masculinity, virulence and high testosterone. Well groomed it shows it is also tempered by civilisation, in stark contrast to the uncouthness of the barbaric Black savages he opposes.
It was a false flag by the NWO
Also get yourself a redpill folder before they scrub every thing
Based Biden dabbing on those g*rmutts for relying so much on Ivan.
Its actually pretty fun.
>t. time traveler.
There were camps but there was no industrial scale mass killing
Pretty funny that the only people that will be targeted by le nukes live in the coastal cities...ie Leftwingers
Gee I wonder why they're quaking in their boots
Russia has enough nukes to destroy entire America, don't worry.
nukes dont exist and those mongol monkeys dont even have a functional military
they're going to target the nuclear silos first to try and take out counterstrike capability, and most of those are in the middle of nowhere by design. there might be fallout that hits the Midwest.
It's military and political targets first, the former to minimise retaliation and the latter to make coordinating a response as difficult as possible
nukes dont exist
In what way is this applicable to the current conversation? I swear, this site is becoming dumber and dumber and full of gullible saps
I mean its about the general point of the Western bloc NWO
And how does the "Western bloc NWO" fit into the current conversation?
If you don't know by now anon.......
Then I need to "lurk mor" on /misc/? Dumb homosexual gullible boomer
zoomers calling anyone gullible is hilarious
their entire frame of reference for anything is the internet
No you just need to not be a bootlicker for the democrat Establishment or other similarly alligned governments and eat their goyslop and think critically
>I'm a Democrat bootlicker because I believe nukes are a devastating capability, especially in number
>I should think critically instead
I think his point is that the West false flagged Nord Stream to start war drums against Russia; just like how Vietnam was started by a false flag. Or how the government basically allowed Pearl Harbor and 911 as an excuse to go to war.
Point is they're trying to psyop you. Also do you actually trust the government, Establishment, elites, whatever?
If Nord Stream was a false flag, it's nowhere near parallel with any of those events, or the Lusitania. Americans have no skin in the game with it either. I believe the government can be deceptive for it's purposes, but a reasonably intelligent and skeptical person can generally suss out the bullshit. Too many people on this site live in a fantasy world however because they've swung too far into absurd skepticism in reaction to the constant noise and lies of the news landscape
>Americans have no skin in the game with it either.
It's conclusively cut away Russia's main leverage over Germany, who have been growing increasingly frustrated over committing economic suicide for the sake of American hegemony and were seeing increasing pressure from the public probably echoed by Russian shillstbf to wind back the sanctions and make a deal for NS2 to be reopened. Now they can't actually make that deal, at least not for the next however-many-months it'll take to repair it (by which point we'll be well past winter so demand for gas won't be as high). Russia's foot has been forced out of the door, and Germany will now have to go back in to America's arms
Sorry, I meant it's not an event that effects/could rile up the American populace. Thanks for the rundown. I hadn't really kept up with the latest on that, only that it would be idiotic for Russians to blow it up. Nor have I really closely looked at the German gas situation. How bad is this winter supposed to be for Germans without Russia's natural gas?
Not him but Germany has already forced factories to close or already scale back production. No idea whether they resolved their coal barge problem. The government have already labelled anyone critical of decades of chronic energy mismanagement as “enemies of the state”.
>decades of chronic energy mismanagement
Because they decomm'd nuclear plants, right?
And planned infrastructure around the idea that there was unlimited gas supply from Russia, that next useless “green” energy wouldn’t cause it own problems and not building more nuclear (long before Fukushima they were dragging their feet on investing more). There’s a delusion in German politics that they can tame the bear, they even have a word for it though it escapes me right now.
>How bad is this winter supposed to be for Germans without Russia's natural gas
Well, before this year's invasion, around 15% of Germany's energy production was from gas power stations. A little more than half of that gas came from Russia, so right away that's a good 7.5% of Germany's energy production compromised.
Then there's the coal, which is another 10% of Germany's grid and, once again, more than half of Germany's coal comes from Russia, so that's 12.5% compromised (plus all the damage that'll do to the steel industry, worsening Germany's ecnomic situation).
Beyond that, there's the knock-on effect of Russia's supply being withdrawn resulting in greater demand for gas and coal from other countries. Now there's more people trying to by Finnish or Qatari gas despite supply remaining constant, so prices are going up rapidly. The result being that they're going to have to spend a frickload of money to plug the gap.
It's not good
Are you sure about those figures? They seem rather low. Also, I’d add the coal logistics problem they face over the summer. Coal was coming into Rotterdam then being stored in depots along rivers and canals. The low rainfall and low volume of water in the waterways means they have a big back log in the supply chain, meaning that while they own a lot of coal it’s in the wrong place. Not sure how that situation has progress over the last 6 weeks.
>They seem rather low.
Germany has been pouring money into renewables for the last 30-odd years, and honestly has really strong hydroelectric and biomass generation. Although there is an extent to which the official numbers for things like solar and wind are being cooked by presuming ideal conditions, so fossil fuels probably are a bit higher than that. Although even with low numbers, that's still 1/8th of German energy production completely fricked
>steel manning Germany’s position
Very based anon. The troons itt could learn from your example. They won’t though
>Americans have no skin in the game
But the Democrats said that Americans must pay more for gas because Putin is diddling in Ukraine. Where's your patriotism chud bigot!!
Or buying an electric car you fascist!
>am now thoroughly convinced that Cinemaphile posters are intellectually on par with /gif/ anons
interdasting
It's the same people on 90% of the boards. I've been here long enough to deduce as much.
Every time I see this poster thumbnail I think it's the coomer wojak
I was personally looking forward to a based chud revolution across the entire West against the commie israelite NWO.....but I guess I'll settle with fighting government remnants in the wastes
I don't think anyone really knows. The nuclear weapons we have today are massively more destructive than what was used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
frick you all and your apathetic takes on this
I dunno, go and make one your zodiac threads you creepy sperg
they're just kids anon, let them have their fun
the satanic left should worry about what comes after
Yes for large cities, not really for the countryside or switzerland.
When will they invent another doomsday weapon? Nukes are too old school, the tungsten rods are cooler
You don't really need anything more powerful than a Tsar bomba in terms of a singular weapon. Because even a single frick up can cause immense damage.
Russia just accepted Belgorod into service, which is equipped with a two megaton cobalt salted semi-autonomous torpedo which creates radioactive tsunamis. Not a big threat but it’s new.
I could post dozens more just like this
>You must sacrifice chud so we can maintain Drag Queen Groomer Hour because Putinmort was puppeting Cheeto Dorrito Hitler!
bump
>Live in a city with pretty much zero value
I'll fap to the live streams before the white flash cuts them off.
Statist propaganda.
>If the government breaks down people wont be able to feed themselves; they won't even be able to speak English anymore!
Lets post all the things we must fight to preserve in our countries when we ship off to fight Emperor Putinmort!!!
Don't worry anons everything's is gonna be ok. Our nuclear defense is diverse and inclusive!!!
kino
>its just a Far Right conspiracy bro
And people wonder why Russia and China don't fear America anymore...
It should actually be a hammer and sickle, but you get the idea
Although I will say that I hope more normie Rightwingers stop playing by the Left's rules and using their language
>muh fashies
They are Marxists
>"we will not send soldiers to Ukraine"
>literally 0 Americans sent by their country to Ukraine
>the only Americans in Ukraine are volunteers there on their own accord
DAE not wanna go to Ukraine to fight Putinmort?!?!? We should all just give up komr-I mean fellow Americans!
I thought that was an honest wojak there for a second
>traffic warden holding a gun
>in the UK of all places
My immersion is broken and my experience ruined. Very unrealistic movie.
This was a part of councils plans to maintain law and order. Fricking terrifying, we all know what traffic wardens are like as people.
It literally almost happened when Russia stationed a nuclear submarine near Cuba and was minutes away from launching a nuke at America because of a faulty communication
the depiction of a reversal to serfdom is way over the top. It'd take 10 years tops to return to some kind of industrialised society. Probably less.
Of course it. It’s fear porn.
Everywhere else did. The end of the movie is the natural state of people from Yorkshire.
>Ukraine turns around the war
>More anti-American, anti-Nato, anti_western world and anti-Ukraine propaganda starts appearing more