Is the “stupid people outbreeding the smart people” actually a valid theory in our world? Could it be a real problem in the future?
 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
|
Is the stupid people outbreeding the smart people actually a valid theory in our world?
YOURE smart, my qt, meow
It is.
It's not even disputable that morons breed more, it's a matter of fact. Of course this flick always brings out the morons who have a wife that continues to shit out kids while they're just barely scraping by.
that has always been the case, but the question is, will we stop advancing as a species like the film depicts? If so, why are we stopping now? the average person became smarter, the more time went on, but it feels like that progression could possibly stop in the near future? why is that?
>the average person became smarter, the more time went on, but it feels like that progression could possibly stop in the near future? why is that?
Everyone in this thread has already told you. If IQ is dropping, it's due to diversity. As a country becomes less white, it'll become less intelligent. The same thing happened to Cinemaphile.
>s a country becomes less white, it'll become less intelligent. The same thing happened to Cinemaphile.
you are so far gone its hilarious
thankfully you'll never actually do anything about this besides shit up threads on here lol
Damn are you mad fr? You really wanna be dick riding immigrants til the day you die?
Seething brown
Its not this simple, even if blacks are dumber than other races the ones that make it (by their own merit) to the USA are better than the "native" african diaspora.
Smart people had families and large families at times. Birth control pill invention in early 60s meant the majority of upper middle class to wealthy had 2 kids at most or none at all. The problem is unironically only 60 years old not a large historical trend especially since poorer children had higher mortality rates etc
>will we stop advancing as a species like the film depicts? If so, why are we stopping now? the average person became smarter, the more time went on, but it feels like that progression could possibly stop in the near future? why is that?
We can backslide as well, it's happened before. A competency crisis will mean existing systems cannot be maintained, which will lead to further failures in infrastructure, which will eventually lead to a total collapse and a return to cycles of famine etc.
>A competency crisis will mean existing systems cannot be maintained, which will lead to further failures in infrastructure, which will eventually lead to a total collapse
>total collapse
What do you think that'll be like? Everyone killing each other for food?
>it's happened before.
>which will lead to further failures in infrastructure, which will eventually lead to a total collapse and a return to cycles of famine etc.
when?
There's a Wikipedia page on societal collapse, so you can read it if you're interested.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse
>A society starts out fairly equal. Its population grows and the cost of labor drops. A wealthy upper class emerges, and life for the working class deteriorates. As inequality grows, a society becomes more unstable with the lower-class being miserable and the upper-class entangled in infighting. Exacerbating social turbulence eventually leads to collapse.
Sounds like exactly what we're going through.
>A society starts out fairly equal
even that part isnt true. going way back to the earliest civilizations there was always a chieftain or leader who dominated everyone else
There was, but primogeniture and a true aristocracy take a long time to ossify into something like the Aztec Empire or 1400s France. The agricultural revolution and it's consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
yeah, we need some serious course correction if we're going to get out of this mess. even the redditors seem faintly aware of this in the back of their minds, like an itch they can't quite reach
>we need some serious course correction
Course correction doesn't mean anything, and people should be more specific. What would say, ceasing all immigration, do to a country? I think it would impact the profits of the rich, which is why they don't do it. If the people in charge don't care, then course correction isn't possible.
>If the people in charge don't care, then course correction isn't possible
this is a useless, defeatest mindset that is not supported by historical evidence
Kek, you have no power over border security you fricking idiot. And if you try to take it into your own hands, you'll be arrested. The frick are you talking about?
sorry, I didn't realize the only two options were enacting violent vigilante justice or sitting on Cinemaphile and stewing in impotent rage.
Well now you know.
>the question is, will we stop advancing as a species like the film depicts?
Yes.
>If so, why are we stopping now?
Political economics. Money. That's all it comes down to. The media and internet have conglomerized human attention, shortening its span, twisting it around to require instant gratification and controlling train of thought through distraction and diversion. Meanwhile, governments dilute the population with demographics that don't speak the national language and can't perform on equal terms in schools. This is likewise motivated by money. Continuing education has lowered its testing standards in order to allow more skin colors into their classrooms, which allows them to gain DEI investments.
AI mechanisms will simply pick up the slack by that point. We will develop genuine artificial intelligence within this decade. Once that happens, our job as a species is basically over. We will just step aside and watch a new species evolve in our place.
>AI mechanisms will simply pick up the slack by that point. We will develop genuine artificial intelligence within this decade
Is that really going to help when Indians are too stupid to repair plumbing?
That's a good question, that nobody wants to address. The people who replace the whites will have to maintain the systems. You just need to look at the countries they came from, to know what a country full of those people will be like. Why would it be any different? It won't.
We are not the same species as the booming sub saharan hominids
We'll never really advance as long as we continue the farce of equality
>the average person became smarter
Maybe more educated but not smarter. Everything is done for you nowadays no thinking is required anymore. And stupid people are regularly kept alive by modern science. moron does something stupid that would normally result in death gets saved by smart doctors/surgeons etc. Now they live on to potentially spread their moron genes.
>why are we stopping now?
If children are an economic burden, people stop having them. Especially if they have more ways to entertain themselves than sex.
People didn't become smarter, they're just as stupid as before. One of the biggest lies ever told was that literacy would make people smarter or better but all its done is make them angrier and more histrionic. We have more stupid people than ever but instead of being quiet are allowed to type stupidity into the internet.
When I become Supreme Leader I'll make illiterate bliss a thing again.
Also non whites shit up societies. That's a fact. I can't wait for the Haitian refugees to eat your brain.
Not only will we stop advancing, we will regress as smart and productive people are weighed down wasting their productivity taking care of an unsustainable population of elderly and Black folk. This is your future, enjoy.
>This is your future, enjoy.
Is your future any different? Why do you speak as if it won't affect you.
It's already happening.
No. Rich people used to have more kids than poor people.
>Rich people used to have more kids than poor people.
If that's true, then why do you think they've stopped? Do the rich have no hope for the future?
The solution was in the film itself, they were going to starve (and will again in the future) until the protagonist taught them to use water on crops.
In that scenario only the people who would are smart and plan for the future would survive.
It'll be a slow grind of humanity being indoctrinated by propaganda and transforming into something grotesque. Everything that we find abhorrent now, will become the new accepted normal 100-200 years from now. All because of homosexual controlling entities who keep hammering our heads with this shit.
the elite have pulled the ladder up.
if you aren't old money rich or new money ungodly rich, you will never have a position of power.
if you have the opportunity to gain power and ability to go further you will be denied by those in power and replace with a 3rd worlder that won't have the ability to go further.
keeping people stupid is in the interest of big money, the first and foremost interest.
>has always been the case
no. nope. nah. never. not at all.
in 1950 the total population of africa was 240 million, and than was including a century of Europeans building infrastructure, providing food, agriculture and sanitation.
they were a few scraps of tribes not long before.
takes 5 seconds to look at population charts to see that, but you're a fricking idiot.
the sole reason for africa doubling in population every 20 years like bacteria is because of ~~*ngos*~~ funneling trillions of gullible Europeans money in, and entirely European tech inventions being used to support them.
you’re a liberal
then why did he just describe the entire continent of africa for the past 80 years?
IQs are already dropping the world over
why does /misc/ like to pick and choose which israeli myths to believe
Because my feelings can tell which are true and which aren't
unlike you who is never wrong
>projected to reach 4 billion Black folk in like 20 years
>Is the “stupid people outbreeding the smart people” actually a valid theory in our world
What do you think?
theory?
>falling birth rates in Europe, USA and Japan
>higher birth rates in the rest of the world
Black folk and sand Black folk are already a massive problem. Sand Black folk infest western countries, get priority for housing and welfare and then just shit out moronic inbred offspring to increase their numbers whilst chanting death to the west. Blacks literally do the same in the US but chant death to whites. They need fricking shooting the lot of them.
GO AWAY, BAITIN'
It's not uncommon for wealthy people to have 4-5 children nowdays. Childless problem is only a midle class thing
They're the only people that can afford that many children besides the indolent welfare class who view children as a paycheck as opposed to a financial burden. It's a terrible system
wtf is middle class?
if you have to work to survive you're working class. owning a car and house or being a "manager" at some shit company does not make you above a guy that stocks shelves
>bootyblasted shelf stocker
im in the top 10% of earners in the country (only £60,000 which is a scary thought) i own a car and my crappy 2 bed house and my colleagues go on about how we are middle class when we are no different any other working individual
what more options do i have? the ability to go on more "inspiring" holidays, a "better" car that still drives form A to B in the same time and what influence do i really have with one vote?
and shitty low paid office jobs arent physically demanding at all
Middle class is just another divide and conquer tactic
>what more options do i have?
more control over your work schedule, for one. all the managers/supervisors I've known just kind of show up to work whenever.
>the ability to go on more "inspiring" holidays
I can't believe you somehow found a way to demonize having time off from work LOL
>what influence do i really have with one vote?
I wasn't talking about voting but cultural influence has way more effect on a country than voting. but I think I was taking more about influence on the company you woke for, which I suppose could also tie into cultural influence.
>and shitty low paid office jobs arent physically demanding at all
sitting in a chair for 8 hours isn't necessarily "physically demanding" but it is physically harmful
>Middle class is just another divide and conquer tactic
well, you guys are the kings of divide and conquer tactics so I guess you would know
im an engineer
In the uk so everyone is entitled to at least 28 days leave, my point on holidays was more about being able to afford more vacations or traveling, not the time off itself. this may have been a UK vs US English language barrier sorry
Higher paid jobs also spend large amounts of time behind a desk so i'm not sure what your point is on that
>im an engineer
kek why do you write like a teenager then?
ummm maybe cuz i fr*ckin want to? >_>;
I was talking more about your outlook and opinions. you sound like an edgy teenager.
bro used kek in 2024 and is calling someone a teenager
>guaranteed 28 day leave
bullshit, is this for all jobs, even cashiers at McDonald's and Tesco? How does anything get done?
american moment
In my country people spend most of their vacation days in June to August, so the whole country effectively enters a slowdown period during those months. At my old blue collar job, they would hire substitutes and summer workers, but at my current white collar job, we have to spread out the workload of the people that are off on vacation.
>does not make you above a guy that stocks shelves
yeah it does. higher positions = more freedom, more options, more influence, less physically demanding work, etc.
the biggest differentiator is how easily replaceable you are. the more specific your skillset the more perks and status you get in general.
yes. true. I meant to bring that up.
Middle class = lower aristocracy who lives from other people's work. "American middle class" = actual working class. Americans for some reason have an aversion to being called what they are.
It's because you're average American working class guy has more disposable income than the middle class in most other developed country. The downside is that they're often one injury away from bankruptcy
no, we just have an aversion to communism, although that is changing since you homosexuals have a stranglehold on education and children's entertainment
Middle class = not struggling to survive and can afford some luxuries. Usually entails home and vehicle ownership and some savings. This used to be standard, but is becoming increasingly more rare. Today, most people are wagie rentoids who vill own nahsing und eat ze backz.
not like the movie obviously but it is already happening, each generation is dumber and change education to be easier which continues the trend
It’s a problem right now.
future?
Of course. So many people voted Trump.
Bait used to be believable. MAGA ‘24, leftie.
you guys simultaneously believe that "so many people voted trump" but also that "trump supporters are a radical minority who only got their guy elected because of the electoral college subverting the popular vote"
look at the state of the chan post '16
trumpers believe anything if it's presented to them in .jpg form
idiocracy was already true back in 2005 when the film came out
things have gotten far worse since then
I have some bad news
I have one that shows the whole world, in case you're interested.
china NEEDS the bbcs
That's an extremely Chinese post, my friend.
China’s issue isn’t there isn’t enough dick. Its problem is that there’s too much dick. They killed so many fricking women in infancy during the one child policy that there’s literally not enough pussy to go around. The Chinese government literally gave themselves an incel problem.
>pussy shortage
Another great famine caused by central planing
From what I've heard on Cinemaphile, the one child policy meant everyone kept the boys, and that's probably why they're below replacement. I don't think they thought that one through.
nuke all the red and yellow bits, gptcha
>16 more years
That presumes that everyone keeps feeding Africa indefinitely, the "natural" African population is around 200 million and it'll be there five years after the dollar dies.
youre right actually. china wont lift a finger to feed africa
I had the pleasure of witnessing a israeli colleague try to explain to a Chinese coworker why the holocaust mattered so much, Chang just gave him a blank stare, "6 million people die all the time, you can't spend too much time on it." In China the Holocaust is a fricking Tuesday.
It's literally always been the case
I mean, look at countries like mexico or anywhere in africa. they clearly geniuses arent the ones having all the kids
the only inaccurate part about idiocracy was portraying america as majority white
we will definitely have a black pornstar/wrestler be president fairly soon though
If you mix Obama with Trump you pretty much have Killmacho.
Jax Slayer 2028
>Jax Slayer
>google his name
>Television Director
>TV Shows: Blacked
>imdb link
>https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7771836/
I know some movies with erotic porn scenes are on imbd but straight up porn?
Might as well add Zone Starfire animation
...
well it has ztv news
>but straight up porn
Are you new to imdb? Of course porn movies are on there. They are movies.
Some are even Kino, like the gay Stephen Geoffreys offerings. You're so cool Brewster indeed!
It made no sense. Conservatives have higher IQs on average and they have more kids
The future would be moral, religious and intelligent
I don't even know what to say about this post. This chart right here:
shows that the
>moral, religious and intelligent
people are on their way out, so what are you even saying?
We all need to convert to Mormonism, anon. White majority, conservative, lots of kids, high emphasis on education and personal achievement. Paying 10% of your income to the Church in perpetuity is a small price to pay for the future of western civilization.
who cares anymore. the future is going to suck no matter what at this point, and Im not going to have kids so frick the future. not wasting my time on worrying about shit I have no control over
>Im not going to have kids so frick the future
It's true; There's no reason to care if you don't have children. It'll be the people who got us into this mess that have children, and they can be the ones that suffer. That's the silver lining, I guess.
There's studies that show that intelligence has dropped in the last few decades on a global scale. And that's using revised IQ tests that got rid/replaced problematic cultural/generational bias so you can't even use that excuse anymore to explain the results. It means the IQ score has dropped even faster and lower than it looks because people were probably smarter back then but the tests were a little flawed so they appeared to be a little dumber.
No. Idiocracy totally ignored the reality of how societies collapse.
They don’t collapse because of
>HURR DURR LE STUPID PEOPLE
It doesn’t even collapse because of division. Otherwise, America would have collapsed 60+ years ago.
You think we’re divided now? Try living through the 60s.
Societies collapse entirely because of what the upper class is doing. Ergo, our politicians and wealthy elite. That would also include corporations in America. The continued erosion of inequality inevitably leads to the further destruction of the working class and inevitably the infighting of the upper classes as they struggle to deal with an increasingly unruly working class.
When the middle class is completely gone and all that’s left is being wealthy and dirt poor, then it’s over.
Being stupid has nothing to do with it. We could all be 130+ IQ geniuses, that won’t magically prevent us from being exploited. If anything, that would promote even faster societal collapse as people would inevitably be dissatisfied with the current circumstances more immediately.
Wall•E is unironically a much smarter film than Idiocracy and better exemplifies how society functions. Convenience, comfort and wealth help satiate human beings leading to their complacency and ultimate subjugation.
We weren’t defeated by a lack of intelligence. We were defeated by submitting to our worst vices because we allowed literal machines functioning through a complex, layered and impenetrable system to dictate our existences, all bred through fear stemming from the ruination of our planet and preservation of our resources.
>We could all be 130+ IQ geniuses, that won’t magically prevent us from being exploited.
I disagree. If we were all that intelligent, we wouldn't need economic classes. We would be living in a post economy like Star Trek by now
>We would be living in a post economy like Star Trek by now
star trek future is complete bullshit. the whole thing only functions because they invented some magic technology that can replicate anything out of thin air. without the magic "infinite resource machine" bullshit they would still need money
Even in a society full of geniuses, there’s always someone smarter. In other words, someone smarter than you that knows how to exploit you.
Adding onto that, human beings aren’t robots. We’re incredibly existentialist, emotional creatures that suffer all sorts of strife as a result. Having high IQs wouldn’t magically change that.
Star Trek is pure wish-fulfillment that suggests human beings are not only smart, but they’ve resolved just about every conflict we could ever foresee having. There’s no fighting over religion, resources, etc. That’s plainly unrealistic, but again, that’s the point of Star Trek.
>Even in a society full of geniuses, there’s always someone smarter. In other words, someone smarter than you that knows how to exploit you.
You're dumb as shit. This has nothing to do with intelligence, it has everything to do with being a psycho. Which most people are not, they just want a normal life.
Psychopaths make up an EXTREMELY small percentage of the human population. If the only people who exploited others were psychopaths, we’d be living in a damn near utopia.
no, what he means are immoral people, those without a conscience, very selfish - criminally minded people.
that's what he means by psycho, and it is a fact that most of the ones exploiting others are not geniuses at all. on the contrary, most technical geniuses do not seek to exploit anyone, because it is usually accompanied by higher degrees of empathy and introspection.
if you look around at criminals and conmen, they are at best only slightly above average. having no or few morals allows you to not play by the rules, i.e. cheat.
it's like cheating in a game of monopoly, it doesn't make you a better player.
now imagine if each successive game of monopoly continued with the money of the previous round. that's how life is.
Doesn’t this further the initial argument that a society full of geniuses wouldn’t solve anything? Because that’s what the original comment was about. The point was, bad people will always exist in one form or another and exploitation will still exist even if everyone in a society is intelligent
’t this further the initial argument that a society full of geniuses wouldn’t solve anything?
Well yeah no shit moron. A society full of moral people would.
>society full of moral people
Good luck with that
Morality is relative. You have to understand that exploitation isn’t seen the same way everywhere else. Japan is one such notable example. So many people within the country take no issue with working themselves to death for employers that quite literally don’t value their lives. If anything, that’s seen as a virtue. There are people within the country who have adopted western values and want to reform the country’s outlook on this, but they are squarely in the minority.
Then there are countries with such strong belief in their governments that they border on religious devotion. They listen and obey with total obedience, and not simply out of fear. They actually hold conviction for what is being done to them.
You can’t call that a moral failing, since you’re only suggesting so out of your own idealized principles.
Culture is the biggest issue here. Not intelligence, race or even morality. You need people to share values to get them to cooperate.
You're a complete moron and I can't believe you're older than 15 or just an American. You're describing virtue on the behalf of the exploited. And the exploitator? What does he say about it in these countries? He is the one who needs to be removed.
>explaining the facts of the world that not everyone sees morality the way that you and I do
>that means I’m endorsing it
I don't know how you see morality but every normal person sees altruism and self-sacrifice as good. Has nothing to do with exploitation. Whoever doesn't see it as such shouldn't exist.
no, morality isn't relativistic. it exists to serve a biologically rooted function, that being the betterment of the surrounding population involved in that singular society, in order to allow for the species to flourish. when I say the species it means that singular society, so preglobalisation, it was countries, or regions, and before that, villages and tribes, which might vary to some degree.
morality, if you bother to read about what it is, or have the capability to think of what it is, is a set of rules whereby the populace can live among each other without great internal catastrophe.
killing one another, not very healthy unless the killing is warranted and for the benefit of the whole tribe - see execution for crimes. theft, because that lowers trust and lessens cooperation and interaction, thus reducing the overall capabilities of the tribe.
time to stop taking snippeta of leftist talking points and just think about things rationally, on your own, if you can to any degree.
japan works in general, despite having been under American occupation for the last 80 years. all their laws, currency etc are American made - look it up. it's not a theory, it's just historical fact.
as for overworking themselves or doing things for the greater good, that is still serving the concept of morality, but in a collective sense rather than individualistic. both methods work, just different styles.
well, given you didn't manage to absorb a single paragraph of information, I doubt another response will help, but here we go.
consider Europe before third worlders arrived. how was crime in general? "you used to be able to leave your door unlocked".
compare japan, high iq, with a low iq country - where would you leave your bike unlocked, Japan or Jamaica. where would you be more likely to be stabbed for no reason.
a society of high iqs exists, places like Japan, scandinavia are peaceful, safe and sensible places compared to low iq countries.
the only thing affecting their crime rates in a negative trend is low iq criminally minded third worlders entering the country and committing 98% of all crime at a factor of a thousand higher than the local population.
id say i am of average intelligence and the thought that half the world is dumber than i am is terrifying
I'm supposed to be a genius according to tests and I feel dumber than most people.
>I feel dumber
Do you? You could just be uneducated, like me. How do you feel about diversity?
Diversity is pretty, tasty and sexy when it's art, food and women, but also scary when it's male.
I guess you aren't intelligent at all, because race-mixing leads to the existence of those males that you're afraid of. Do you not see that?
I think he's suggesting we do a reverse china and drown all the male mixed children
It's just skin. They all are as moronic as the whites of their respective countries. They're basically LARPERs when it come to their culture.
As any old immigrant what they think of the children born in their new countries. They don't consider them 'real.' Just whites with darker skin pretending to be X-race.
Men seem to not want to talk about it, but ask any immigrant grandma and she'll tell you.
It's not just skin, and I won't even speak to someone who thinks that, because they're part of the problem. Don't bother replying.
>build a fictional world around a real observed phenomena(morons breeding like rabbits while smarter people maybe pop out 1 or 2 kids)
>add some exaggeration
>"whoa its like they predicted the future"
Is this how religions start?
No, but this is how science fiction is created. Some science fiction does become religion, like Mormonism or Scientology.
The biggest problem with modern civilization in regards to human decline is the scientific advancement of natal care and continued elimination of infant mortality
Our greatest form of natural selection is both the gestational period and birthing process being long, difficult, unsuccessful, and sometimes fatal for infant and/or mother
Too many people are born and survive to reproduce that shouldn't, and it's just as much of a factor as whatever environmental factors others want to blame as to why we're getting weaker, sicker, uglier, and dumber
>Too many people are born and survive to reproduce that shouldn't
this part is very true. natural selection doesnt really happen with humans anymore. and with all these weak, sickly people who would have died off centuries ago preproducing thats how you get so much autism and mental illness
You guys have been reading Mein Kampf way too much
I'm not saying I'm some super human, I'm blind as frick without corrective lenses
I was a cesarean born baby, my older brother may have made it, but definitely would have killed my mom in the process
I also would likely have died from a sinus infection I used to get a few times as a child that probably would have become pneumonia
jews have high intelligence though. the real social Darwinism of the nazis was when they were killing off the mentally and physically disabled
Sure. Traits that survive in a given environment are what matters.
In a world where most of civilization can be automated, and the automation can more or less self-maintain or persist indefinitely, the automation creates an artificially stable and rich environment. There is little selective pressure on abstract cognitive forms of performance, math, reading. Whoever breeds most will become prevalent in the population. Intelligence only becomes a survival trait at the end of the movie when the automation ends up accumulating errors due to misuse by idiots.
Look at a crop like radish. If you baby it on a farm, it is happy to grow in nice rows with little variety. But if it escapes into the wild, it will rapidly become several different types of wild radish to survive pests, animals, weather.
All Luke Wilson did in Idiocracy is send them on the Golden Path.
Democrats have fewer kids so don't worry about the future
Are you not worried because you're brown, and your people are the ones who will be left in America?
White leftoids are worthless. Replace them with right wing browns
Because Brawndo, it's got electrolytes !
Right now yeah reproductive incentives are heavily weighed towards R-selected morons, it won't get as bad as idiocracy because it's not going to take 1,000 years for the current welfare state to collapse.
Yes, but it's fine. I don't know why you think we need that many smart people. Most of humanity is moronic slave stock and that's a good thing. Imagine if humans were all intellectual types. Nothing would ever get done. We need moronic beer-chugging rednecks nogs and mexicans to do all the grunt work.
>We need moronic beer-chugging rednecks nogs and mexicans to do all the grunt work.
That doesn't make sense. Why do they have to be different races?
>Why do they have to be different races?
Where did I say they "have to be"? They don't, but keep in mind this is both the reason they shipped over black slaves back in the day, and the reason they keep around illegal mexicans. moronic grunt labor is a requirement. Those roles could be fulfilled by trailer park Whites if there were enough of them.
>Those roles could be fulfilled by trailer park Whites if there were enough of them.
Correct, and that's what happened in the past, before diversity. So why is non-white slave labour even a thing? You haven't been able to answer that. If every white country functioned pre-diversity, why is diversity necessary?
It's not. Never said it was either. You're picking a fight with someone who agrees with you on the issue. Yet, we are swamped with hispanics and nigs all the same, they aren't going anywhere and they make up a sizeable chunk of the moronic grunt labor.
Taxing remissions to Central America at an insane rate, making it impossible for them to get ebt/rent/energy assistance. Only teach in English in public schools. non-citizens aren’t afforded the protections of the US constitution, so we can basically arrest a goblino indefinitely for anything ala Guantanamo Bay.
There’s a ton of ways we could get the mexigoblins and squatemalans to self-deport
>Yet, we are swamped with hispanics and nigs all the same
I'm not American, but the same problems are everywhere.
>Only teach in English in public schools
or maybe just bring back segregation. Would immigrants be happy to live in white countries if they had to live in areas with their own people? It would be identical to the place they left.
Everyone that watches this movie thinks they’re one of the smart people, including the stupid people, which is you and not me.w42ww
>whites just have higher IQ than blacks we need to acknowledge this fact.
🙂
>Asians and Indians have higher IQ than whites.
>:(
>Asians and Indians have higher IQ than whites.
What are you basing this on, exactly? What did you see?
Such an amazing vibrant people. They should use that amazing IQ back in their homelands to help their own people
You whites "enriched" every single place you could find but now that other cultures are getting better at the game you wanna call time out
>other cultures are getting better at the game
What game? You guys aren't even playing the game. You'll spend the rest of your lives talking about white people, because you don't matter. You know I'm right, you pathetic frick. Reply after the fricking hide. Just know that I've filtered every non-white containment thread on the board, and that's why you're posting in this one. You aren't even a little intelligent.
big mad
>it's another Indian complains about colonialism while never acknowledging the built in institutionalized caste system that existed for hundreds of years and ensured zero social mobility and civil improvement
It’s a jeet. They believe their hearts are immune to restraining orders and bodies immune to trains.
>Indians
Lol
And yeah Asians are smarter, much rather live around them than 70IQ mudheads
>much rather live around them
Why don't you go hang out with them? They're here on Cinemaphile, and I'm surprised you don't know that. You can go talk to them in the Shogun general, that I have filtered. Really horrible people.
>Asians and Indians have higher IQ than whites.
asians definitely, and no one has a problem with the except blacks. indians nah lol
no.
this is incorrect and the only reason you believe so is because only the smart ones use to escape to america and their parents punish the frick out of them if they don't do as expected in school.
if we're going off of anecdotes then everyone's a fricking moron, and I've met way more white people, therefore white people are fricking moronic. so if that's the way you wanna go that's fine by me.
Which Asians?
>India
This chart says the big three are the smartest, and the only one I doubt is Korea.
they are honorary Aryans
Singapore and Hong Kong were Britanized
>they are honorary Aryans
Thanks for the lol. Koreans are the fricking worst. Always posting their ugly ass women on this board.
A lot of these skin colors are waaaaaay off
The bugmen are 105 IQ? What about if they get disconnected from the hive?
It’s already a problem. Trump was already elected president 8 years ago by his moron followers.
Look I'm not saying Trump himself is the sharpest tool in the drawer but after the last four years it's time to admit the toothless meth people did in fact know better than you on the whole Trump vs. Biden thing.
No. The fastest growing country in the world is India. Indians have very high IQs and India is a leading technological country.
Indians aren't even capable of toilet training, they have the intellectual capacity below a toddler. Imagine wiping your shit with your bare hand, you're below a fricking animal.
It’s very clearly a thing, but it’s been happening since the dawn of time. It’s the reason we have factory workers and janitors.
Yes but its brown people. Stupid white people are a problem too obviously, but like 90% of brown people are stupid and they orders of magnitude dumber and more violent. Case and point literally any brown country.
It didn’t take 200 years or whatever like the movie depicted. It just took 25 years of mexigoblins being allowed to reproduce.
it's true both within races and between races, e.g. dumber whites breed more than smarter whites. and black africans outbreed everyone.
there are exceptions. smarter swedes outbreed dumber swedes. same is true of japan.
but the problem with sweden and japan and almost all high IQ countries is that their population is sub-replacement fertility.
>the problem with sweden and japan and almost all high IQ countries is that their population is sub-replacement fertility.
Why do you think that is? I'll never have children because I'm poor, but what about the people in those countries?
I mean, we know it's been happening for decades now.
it's over for us first world chads
the elites won't say the quiet part out loud, but this is why they push hard for birth control and feminism in third world shitholes
Yeah, but the cause is women chasing careers, not them being too smart per se.
Yes because the so called "intelligent" people believe in climate change and overpopulation. They think the child free life is great and only low iq illegals should be repopulating
it's been happening for the entirety of reality. it's not going to be much worse than it already is. comparing now to back then, the general public is much more intelligent.
it's women in education and population density causing population decline
https://twitter.com/sebjenseb/status/1767437571141906782
STOP COMPARING REAL LIFE TO IDIOCRACY
NONE OF THE POLITICIANS IN IDIOCRACY WERE MALICIOUS
ALL THE DUMB PEOPLE IN THE MOVIE WERE AT LEAST HAPPY
THIS IS A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
IRL POLITICIANS ARE NOT moronic
THEY ARE MALICIOUS
IT IS BY DESIGN.
No. Intelligence is not a number. People that feel the smartest in the room are usually just underestimating or straight up ignoring other fields in which the others are vastly surpassing them. Human evolution is a collective effort and simple peasants had a role in making today what is today as sciencemen and aristocrats
so are you implying that blacks are stupid?
because sub-saharan Africa is about the only region on earth with a high fertility rate
Are you really asking that question on Cinemaphile? If you are, then you're just confirming it.
no, it's always been this way. The population is the highest its ever been, plus globalization. It's not an issue.
It's valid and true. There are some times in history where it wasn't though. For awhile, during ages like the victorian age, upper class was outbreeding the lower class.
Right now though, the biggest breeders in the world are actually the Amish. They're higher than Nigeria. However they're also a very very small group comparatively. But because of their breeding habits, in around 150 years, they will be the dominant group in America. SO the question is: How Smart are the Amish? Same as average whites.
>Is the “stupid people outbreeding the smart people” actually a valid theory in our world?
the third world, muslim, hindoo and russia are evolutionary dead ends, the Internets were better without them and the planet would be better off if they were wiped out
You're American, aren't you? I can tell because nobody else would put Russia there.
Nope Americans are too nice and polite about the facts I stated to put them as directly.I assume you are some gibbering brown heathen vermin under the delusion you are to be considered a human?
Well yeah, Africa is experiencing a population explosion and so is south east Asia.
The problem is, at least in my eyes, you either need to be financially stable or have a family on which you can count as a backup. In the west both have been destroyed now. This is why white men prefer to go to Asia, they still have the familial backup, and are growing financially.
Oh, they aren’t? Mind sharing your scales?
Sure, here you go anon.
https://archive.org/details/fivetypesofethic00broa
They don't teach ethics anymore, so it's understandable moron midwits think applying different scales is the samething as a relative morality.
>linking a limited preview ebook that can’t be borrowed
You’re not very smart, are you?
>can't find it on his own after being given the title
low iq parasite
stupid people live shorter lives. it evens out
see
>smokers
>fat people
>fast drivers
>drug addicts
>sports players
>transexuals
also attractive women with good genes tend to go for men who have lots of money. it takes brains to get money and even more to keep it
Go to California and look at the various socioeconomic communities. The rich ones maybe have 1-2 kids. The barrios and ghettos are spitting them out like tobacco
if eugenics works then why are dogs and cats still as stupid as their ancestors?
because 99.9% of them aren't selectively breeded to be smarter
It's not so much about eugenics, but rather the general collapse of knowledge and excellence. Everything's getting so automated and our culture is all about stupid dopamine dispensers now we're getting dumber as a whole.
i design automation systems so i'm quite happy with people losing their jobs and their traditional knowledge. it makes me feel special
have you never gone outside? yeah it is gonna be a problem in the future i would say it has been a problem for a while now
africa is expected to go from 1.5 B to 4 B in the next 75 years
Natural selection doesn't exist enough to weed them out anymore.
>Dumb person "I must have more kids so my lineage survives"
>Smarter "My child will survive, he Is smart"
>bomalian: 72 kids, 1 husband who delivers fast food
>white: 0 kids, sterile, good house, excellent pension, set for life, dies at 56 of an anuerysm
it's a problem in the present