Is there a better example of the Dunning-Kruger effect? They think they're so much more intelligent and cultured than they are.
>review Northman
>compare it to fricking Braveheart of all things
>talk about how easily entertained people who like Braveheart are
>say how those people don't get movies like this
>fail to notice at any point that Amleth is a fricking anagram for Hamlet
>Hamlet would be a much better comparison
And Mike's knowledge of history is so atrocious
>they're not filthy enough, i bet that was a studio decision
As if people in the past couldn't fricking bathe or wash their clothes.
>their teeth werent rotten enough, they didn't have toothpaste back then
Despite the fact that sugar is the biggest cause of tooth decay and wasn't a major part of people's diets until around 1500, and even then ancient peoples would chew sticks to clean their teeth and the romans did in fact have toothpaste
>the woman was wearing makeup it was distracting!
Even though makeup has existed longer than the fricking written word. Its not hard to put a bit of charcoal on your eyes or find colored powders to rub on your face.
Fricking brainlets the pair of them, which would be fine if they weren't utterly convinced that they're better than the average movie consumer
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
I usually like RLM but you are absolutely correct about their Northman review.
Thank you for validating my anger
I thought the exact same things rofl
> Is there a better example of the Dunning-Kruger effect?
Stupid analogy, since the DK effect is supposedly showing you improving over time when they are hack frauds for years.
Anyway you're stupid for bringing this up; their purpose is not really to review things; they are in reality a comedy show.
Jay thinks he’s a movie buff because he watches obscure horror b movies. Mike likes to complain about stupid braindead blockbusters but loves shit like TFA, Jurassic World, and other dumb movies because it’s fun schlock
Absolutely correct
This
Anything by them apart from Best of the Worst is fartsniffing pseud food
Mikes positive review of Joker and Jurassic World show how dumb he is
Yeah they had nothing interesting to say about it, Mike probably didn't like it either but had to pretend he did.
The Söyman was like Gladiator with none of the fun and 2 hours longer than it needed to be
rlm is a glorified reaction channel for friendless manchildren to pretend they are their friends. It doesn't matter what they say or do, they are just "bantering" and cracking jokes to enhance the fake friend act.
This
/thread
Based. Frick these hacks
fricking frauds. how can they just prey on the weak and vulnerable like that?
mike always skims over wikipedia articles before they film an episode then he pretends that he always knew whatever he just looked up and berates the audience for not being as smart as he is. he does this so often now it's just embarrassing.
would be a much better comparison
They weren't comparing the stories. They were comparing something that your tiny brain obviously couldnt comprehend.
They will never be your friends.
and you will never be right.
See
>>they're not filthy enough, i bet that was a studio decision
>As if people in the past couldn't fricking bathe or wash their clothes.
People in the past literally thought poop particles protected them from infection and washed their teeth with piss
Drinking urine is good for you so brushing your teeth with piss must be good too. The old ways are sometimes superior.
Scandinavian men at that time bathed and groomed themselves quite frequently.
yes and arabs said they shared a collective bucket to do it, so not so clean after all huh?
lmfao
Nice try but Ahmad ibn Fadlan was talking about Rus merchants when he said that, not Scandinavians.
Not settled Scandinavians*
Space Cop didn't tip you off to their lack of artistic sensibilities?
That whole fiasco is so embarrassing. Anyone can make a bad film on purpose, but they werent capable of making a good bad film
space cop is literally unwatchable
>compare it to fricking Braveheart of all things
>talk about how easily entertained people who like Braveheart are
Mostly all Mike, I fricking knew it was edited by Mike when it shoehorned in a load of pointless incidental shots that look vaguely similar like it was some grand revelation.
Jay mostly just nods along and looks slightly uncomfortable.
Mike is the new Rich: loud, arrogant, and dumb.
But he knows enough about cinema to know when he's supposed to like something.
Its how he falls for shit like Pig. Its slow and artsy and tells a revenge story where the protagonist doesnt kill anyone.
Never mind how shit the pacing was, how laughably cringe the dialogue was etc.
>shoehorned in a load of pointless incidental shots that look vaguely similar
Did you seriously mistake Monthy Python and the Holy Grail for Braveheart? And you're calling Mike dumb lmao.
tbf I was talking about the comparisons with Gladiator at the end and forgot that it was Gladiator instead of Braveheart because it's been a few days since I watched the review
moron never post again, you're as stupid as mike
The Prequels suck dude
Mike literally thinks a movie can’t have more than protagonist and thinks all movies should adhere to the hero’s journey. The guy is a fricking moron. He’s the type to dislike a movie because the main character isn’t relatable enough
>still seething about the prequels
No one is going to give you a genuine reply
Based
Why did Mike think that the movie took place over 30 years? To me it was very obvious that Amleth is written and portrayed as younger than Skarsgard is in real life. The movie takes place over like 16 years, that's how old the evil cousin is, and he was a newborn when the king was killed
Are we sure he even fricking watched it? He might have just seen a trailer or watched it with no audio or something
>evil cousin
He wasn't even that bad. I thought they would really play up a "villain prince" trope but he was pretty chill for the most part.
All their paypigs have to convince themselves they have good taste in movies or else that's thousands down the drain.
Daisy Ridley is charismatic as hell, says the closeted gay.
Why can't they just stay in their fricking lane? They watch trash, they enjoy trash. Theyre not cut out for good cinema, they don't even know what good cinema is, they just think they do because theyve seen so much bad
>Why can't they just stay in their fricking lane?
The algorithm favors discussing current films over obscure old movies, so they follow the money.
Morbius would have been more their speed
>compare it to fricking Braveheart of all things
And? They were able to point out similarities and discrepancies. It was about how a historical set film could either entertain large audiences or be more of an art house piece.
See
And the fact that Braveheart is a cultural touch stone for them is the fricking point here. Its embarrassing to compare this movie to BH when it is literally Hamlet. But they didn't realize that connection, and they've never seen any adaptation of Hamlet, so they can't talk about it
>And the fact that Braveheart is a cultural touch stone for them is the fricking point here.
...And? The jumping point was, "Despite decent reviews, why isn't this historical film making back it's money". BH comparison was apt in this regard, stop getting triggered.
>compare movie to braveheart because thats all you know when it comes to historical films set in northern europe
>completely unable to discuss the enduring popularity of hamlet and its adaptations and their popularity
Black person. Lion King is the worlds most famous adaptation of Hamlet. That would be a more fricking apt comparison for popularity than Braveheart.
The point you're not understanding is because you're explaining their behavior retroactively rather than asking what the source of the behavior is
They compare to braveheart due to limited understanding
>Black person. Lion King is the worlds most famous adaptation of Hamlet. That would be a more fricking apt comparison for popularity than Braveheart.
...You would have been happier if they brought up Disney's the lion king when discussing the economic status of the Northman?
Oh shit you posted a chad meme, guess I've lost.
Yes you fricking homosexual. Comparisons to Braveheart are superficial. Theres nothing in common other than being a historical film set in the north of europe
They don't understand what story they're even critiquing. The fact it is literally hamlet opens the door to discussions of other adaptations.
Discounting the most popular adaptation of this story just because its a Disney film is exactly the sort of midwitism that RLM is being criticized for ITT
>They don't understand what story they're even critiquing. The fact it is literally hamlet opens the door to discussions of other adaptations.
It's not even an adaptation of hamlet though, It's the Amleth story from the Gesta Danorum. Hamlet is an adaptation/remix of Amleth and not the other way round, my angry friend.
You're shitting on them for not bringing up Hamlet when Hamlet itself is superficially related, a different branch on the tree. The biggest Hamlet adaptation is likely the lawrence Olivier 1948 one, and it isn't a blockbuster so bringing it up when discussing why the northman bombed wouldn't make any sense.
Call me a gay all you want, you point in fricking dumb and your shitting on people for what you're doing now.
>It's not even an adaptation of hamlet though, It's the Amleth story from the Gesta Danorum. Hamlet is an adaptation/remix of Amleth and not the other way round, my angry friend.
Aware of this, my disabled friend.
>Aware of this,
If you're aware hamlet is the adaptation then why are you acting autistic about them not bringing it up?
Because holy fricking shit its the same fricking story. It doesnt matter what you call it. Most people know it as Hamlet. Northman is as much an adaptation of Hamlet itself as it is the original story.
When Denzel Washington's Macbeth came out did you get upset that no one compared it to Scotland PA?
>RLM didn't do a full shakespearian anal-ISIS of something that Hamlet got adapted from! They compared it to a fricking movie they saw instead!
Boo fricking hoo.
>When Denzel Washington's Macbeth came out did you get upset that no one compared it to Scotland PA?
Does it take effort to be this moronic, or does it come naturally to you?
I'm making fun of you.
Yeah, by making a poor comparison, which just shows you don't understand the point.
If an adaptation eclipses the original story so much that it literally becomes trivia that the adaptation is an adaptation, and then someone retells the original story hundreds of years after the adaptation has seeped into culture so much that even the uneducated recognise quotes like "alas poor yorick" then yeah, its fair to say the present retelling is as much a telling of the adaptation as it is the original story
>its fair to say the present retelling is as much a telling of the adaptation as it is the original story
Says who? They skipped over using Shakespear as a source in this story. Lion King was popular, but woah look they Simba isn't in the northman.
But back on topic, they were talking about box office draws. The fact that Hamlet came after Amleth isn't needed.
Youre just missing the point deliberately why would I bother continuing?
I'm not missing your point. It's a shit point. You're mad they didn't mention Hamlet, and instead mentioned Braveheart, but they brought up Braveheart in reference to ticket sales and audience reciprocation. The only Hamlet to be a blockbuster is The lion King, but that's not an apt comparison because we'd be talking animated family friendly Disney movie VS historical drama with completely different goals.
You only want to bring up Hamlet to massage your ego when comparisons of this nature and in this discussion would be unnecessary. Then you shat the bed a little more when you got told Hamlet came after Amleth. "B-b-but it's essentially Hamlet now because Hamlet is more popular!" Well now Lion King is more popular, so fricking what.
Dude, frick off.
holy shit mike is SEETHING over his shakespeare illiteracy and lack of historical knowledge
Your point is extremely moronic, when they compared to Braveheart they were not comparing the story so Hamlet and Shakespeare is irrelevant in the conversation, they were explicit comparing both as historical action-dramas. Your point would make sense if instead of insisting of Shakespeare (as if it’s some super smart reference even though it’s taught in high school) you used Gladiator or Apocalypto as a better choice for conparing with Northman.
Theyre comparing it to Braveheart because they're room temp IQ morons who see "wow old time-y dudes with swords!"
If they had even a modicum of cultural knowledge they would instantly recognise Hamlet and be able to discuss why this adaptation was not as successful as others
It’s pretty clear why they were comparing it to braveheart, it’s ironic that you’re insulting their intelligence based on that while demonstrating how badly you missed their simple point
>It’s pretty clear why they were comparing it to braveheart
To everyone but you it seems.
They made the comparison because they made a superficial connection.
A much stronger connection was lost to them because they know very little.
Except they were not discussing it as an adaptation of anything, they were discussing it as a genre and how well it can do at the box office. Lion King, Hamlet, etc, are all irrelevant because they are not historical action-dramas. But keep acting moronic, it’s always the last resort of someone that has lost an argument.
>Because holy fricking shit its the same fricking story
Have you not read Hamlet, the Gesta, or both? Because they are extremely different
Again, they're comparing historical epics and the reason why Braveheart and Gladiator were crowd pleasers and this was not. Why is this so hard to grasp?
idk the guy is moronic friend
You're so fricking stupid
kek someone's seething about being called a clown
Why would your afro be visible from your POV?
they probably should have mentioned it's connection to Hamlet, but they brought up Braveheart and Gladiator because they are similar but more accessible movies for the general public
Which Hamlet film is easily digested by normies like those are? The 4 hr Kenneth Branagh one? No, there's literally just The Lion King (which has other big influences), so it's a little contrived to bring up.
there are no popular hamlet movies, besides they were discussing popular historical films and why this flopped compared to something like braveheart. but you're just a moronic ESL shitskin so I don't expect you to understand these extreme subtleties
How fricking moronic are you? You didn't understand the point of the comparison at all
>I take film criticism seriously
Who cares?
I think the real moron is you op
>imagine caring about things lmao, im too cool for that
We're all very impressed.
You made a thread to whine about a youtube review from some fat moron and his twink butt-buddy
>imagine caring about things lmaoooo
No, imagine caring about this
>replying to every post in your gay thread
You are sad. I hope you're not on US hours, just neetgayging at home to do this
You're just a barrel of laughs, aren't you?
Cry moar about your fat internet friends liking the wrong things, you sad homosexual
>projection
Who's the one seething in a thread they don't even like lol
>that Amleth is a fricking anagram for Hamlet
Look at this unlearned dumbass. Amleth isn't the anagram. Hamlet is.
Thats why it says "for", not "of" you mental midget
It still doesn't make sense when that's not the story it's based on you dumb Black person
>n-no I knew that shutup!
You are pathetic
I love braveheart
The sad fact is that they are smarter than most critics out there because everything has gone to shit. Journalism, art criticism, art itself have all declined because standards are in the gutter. People are too scared to be labelled a hater or god forbid a 'gatekeeper' that RLM looks rigorous in comparison.
mike is still mourning the death of star trek while refusing to watch the good star trek show that released immediately after he'd lost faith in humanity
give him a break
Strange New Worlds is basically "MEMBER SPOCK?!"
Anyone whose brain hasn't been fried with nostalgia porn rightfully sees it as shit.
watch the show
>the good star trek show
Lmao
Calm down Eggers. Your movies was still good
Red Letter Media is fundamentally wrong.
Mike and Jay approach tv shows and movies as problems to be solved instead of just something to be experienced. The truth is that Mike and Jay are massively moronic pseuds who don't actually understand the media they watch.
With every "review", RLM has the audacity to claim that they've come up with an objective, and all-encompassing interpretation to a wide variety of media. Even if you think their arguments are flawless, RLM's biases the viewer towards a certain interpretation of that media, robbing the viewer of the intended effect of the media, which is to have your own beautiful, unique experience. It's absolutely cancerous.
Without a doubt, people who don't want to think for themselves will be drawn in. It's actively cancerous to them and their experience, even if they want someone to explain it to them. I know Cinemaphile highly values people who are individualistic but the one way to make sure people REMAIN non-individualistic is to give them a self-professed "objective" interpretation on a silver platter for something they should think about themselves before they have a chance to do so.
In short, all RLM does is violently insert their headcanon inside things. No thanks; I'd rather stick with my own impressions of the tv shows and movies. Don't want some e-clown autist to ruin it for me.
>In short, all RLM does is violently insert their headcanon inside things
Its so bizarre. sometimes they will literally mention things that didn't fricking happen or have completely unfounded interpretations of things that were obvious to normal people
based
Mike Stoklasa is a moron and I don’t know why RLMgays take the shit that comes out of his as gospel.
I realized how bullshit they were once they started shilling Marvel and shitting on DC, as if Marvel is good (lol)
Go easy on Mike.
His alcoholism has destroyed his brain and made him a homosexual.
Bravehart and Gladiator are such overrated films. They're like the go-to popcorn flicks of period film, totally accessible to even the lowest iq normalgays
>They're like the go-to popcorn flicks of period film, totally accessible to even the lowest iq normalgays
Congratulations you have the same midwit take as RLM
Broken clock. It's a hard truth for the diehard fangays on Cinemaphile, but it's still the truth. They're pop-film, designed for the masses.
>Basedman
Stay angry, movie is shit.
Yes.
>Literally gets filtered
>Jack, Jay and Rich all throw hissyfits and start screaming like morons whenever anyone asserts Rey is a marysue. They go absolutely fricking mental and have no counter argument.
>Rich stated in the Civil War review that Iron Man was right and all the super heroes should be government controlled.
>Rich and Jack follow only one account on their twitch account "jamsponge" which is the account of turbo SJW Matt Lees, the homosexual currently stating "meritocracy isn't real" "You shouldn't be able to buy houses in video games because they're expensive in real life." "Games should be promoting socialism."
>Rich stated in the Ready Player One review he "couldn't connect to the boring white male protagonist."
>They all drooled about DIVERSITY in their reviews of Black Panther, Wonder Woman, and Annihilation.
>"Hollywood Patriarchy"
>Rich and Jack called Kojima a "misogynist" and an "immature 13 year old boy" because of Quiet's appearance and outfit.
>Rich whined in typical numale fashion that he hates big boobs and quote "anything more than a handful, and I don't care whether they're real or fake" while being engaged to someone who quite seriously is of questionable gender.
>Jay has used the word "progressive" as a positive in numerous videos, and referred to Victoria Jackson as having "horrible politics" because she's conservative
>Mike shills for replacing the protagonist of The Rocketeer (one of his favorite films) with a afro womyn of color in a hypothetical reboot to signal how progressive he is unlike online mysoginerds
>Mike's main criticsm of Star Trek Picard's political theme is that its insincerely progressive and not actually progressive enough.
>Mike and Rich dedicate half of the TNG Season 1 complaining about how sexist the show was for having the female characters wear skirts.
>A GUY IS INTO A CHICK?? THIS MOVIE HAS A CASE OF THE NOT GAYS!!!
>WHY DIDNT FINN AND POE HAVE ASS SEX?! ARE DISNEY PASSIVE PROGRESSIVE?! THIS HAS A SERIOUS CASE OF THE NOT GAYS
>while being engaged to someone who quite seriously is of questionable gender.
I have to know more
Just google rich evans wife. It legit just looks like an alcoholic man
I know it sounds like a cope-out, and it's certainly unfounded, but personally, even as someone bordering on a full rahowa-tier /misc/gay, if I was in their position, I'd larp as a leftie too. It's just the safe thing to do. We live in that sort of society.
>Jay has used the word "progressive" as a positive in numerous videos, and referred to Victoria Jackson as having "horrible politics" because she's conservative
based as frick
Yeah it wasn't the most deep analysis and Mike can be annoying with his wannabe insightful split screen comparisons.
However, Gladiator comparison is relevant and their show is firstly casual talks and not thorough breakdowns so it's still cool for what it is.
They have always been disingenuous hack fraudsters, all the way back to the plinkett reviews
Maybe you shouldn't take these youtube comedy videos where two people have a casual conversation so seriously.
This was the straw that broke the camel's back for me, been done with them for a while but never had the heart to unsub until this review - they won't miss me
vikings only bathed once a week.
I've heard historians say vikings were especially hygienic for their time, but then I've also heard contemporary accounts describing their hygienic practices as barbaric.
More than the average RLM fan
they literally talked shit about the new matrix for 40 minutes then proceeded to recommended it. they are confused morons who should never be taken seriously
I love how these two alcoholics make Cinemaphile chuds seethe so much.
>chuds
Munch glass.
seething lol.
>I love how these two alcoholics make Cinemaphile chuds seethe so much.
>makes a living trashing on other people's work
>Rides on the coattails of filmmakers more talented than them
>acts smug and superior yet has only created trash comedy hidden behind 'it's bad on purpose'
why do you worship these parasite hacks
>has only created trash comedy hidden behind 'it's bad on purpose'
This angers me so much
>hidden behind 'it's bad on purpose'
They themselves admitted they werent trying to be bad on purpose so its even worse. They genuinely don't know how to light a shot
>They genuinely don't know how to light a shot
The lighting in the movie isn't anything amazing but it's mostly fine. And they've done plenty of other skits since then that have better lighting than Space Cop because they've since upgraded their equipment.
there's nothing worse than somebody trying to do "so bad it's good" intentionally. that only really works when people (usually with at least *some* talents) try really really hard to make something good and fail spectacularly.
What does this mean?
That Mike points out in Force Awakens that Rey doesn't have to learn anything.
But in Last Jedi Jay makes fun of the fact that Snoke is angry that Kylo was beaten "by a girl" when really the point was that she had never held a lightsaber, she'd never learned, she was just instantly the best
these Black folk never saw conan? why compare it to gladiator?
Because they are the same normies they claim to despise, they just can't see it
> it's another /tv seethes about RLM thread
yawn
kek
in his plinkett crystal skull video he shows some of his early film stuff with rich and jay and says
>indiana jones was the inspiration for many film makers today
literally laughed my ass off at mike calling himself a film maker
> durrrr some dumbasses from milwaukee made a movie with their friends and it has a low IMDB score
> hurrr durrr RLM btfo!!!!
Here's a good example of the Dunning-Kruger effect for you, OP.
Nice try, Jay.
>Wisconsin opinions
These people exist on stale beer and cheese. They hate themselves as a fact of life and that miserable nature projects on to everything that isn't as easily digestible and feel-good as the processed foods they gorge themselves on quickening their deaths to escape the misery of living in a Midwestern shithole.
>people take mikes opinion seriously after the midnight mass review
I didn't even finish that review. I couldn't.
But for me the signs were there when they thought VVitch was good because it was a period drama in old English.
And again when they preferred Haunting of Bly Manor to Hill House.
I knew they couldn't be trusted when they said Pig was a masterpiece
And I gave up on them when they liked the Suicide Squad remake
Pig was a masterpiece
Vvitch is good
Suicide squad, for being capeshit, wasn't completely inwatchable.
Yet you didnt even mention their worst opinion ever, which made me lose all respect for them which was "midnight mass was the best show ever made." They are such midwits its insane.
Patreon paypig here, screencap this. You are not gonna believe this one. Mike hated the new top gun and jay loved it.
I only watch their Nu Trek content for the pain it brings them.
>everybody in the past was dirty and stinky and stupid and covered in mud at all times and we are soooooooooooo much better and soooooooooo enlightened these days
I fricking hate people who fall for this psyop. It's literally designed to trick you into tolerating modernity despite the fact that this is objectively the worst time to be alive in human history by a HUGE margin. We have fewer rights, less free time, work harder for less pay, own less property, have fewer opportunities for advancement, less community, less rewards for doing something good, less family, less human interaction, less of everything worth having than ever at any point in human history.
Its like anyone that says that shit hasn't gone camping for an extended period of time. They lived right next to a stream, its not hard to wash off, though the slaves *could* have looked dirtier just to make their situation look worse than the normal villagers by comparison.
They have terrible taste and are full of themselves
they never made a good film why are they like this?
they criticise pop culture and consumerism but that's all they have
the people who watch these homosexuals are idiots
>Amleth is a fricking anagram for Hamlet
Your post is also, funnily, Dunning-Kruger. Amleth is not meant to be an 'anagram' for Hamlet, it is simply the original Norse form of the name and was a reasonably common given name in medieval Scandinavia
yeah but didnt shakespeare intend that
it's a midwit trait to learn trivia to appear smart
when push comes to shove high IQ is being good at problem solving and it's highly correlated with wealth
the RLM guys are smarter than all of the people in this thread including me by virtue of being incredibly rich
I guess all the Kardashians are geniuses then. I swear to god, there are some genuinely stupid fricking people on this site.
>I guess all the Kardashians are geniuses then.
unironically, so is Kanye West
i wouldn't say geniuses tho, but definitely in the 115-120 IQ range
I didn't know nepotism and getting all your money handed to you on a platter now equates to being super smart.
Perhaps you should read more:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289607000219
How about opening a fricking dictionary and learning what "nepotism" means. Jesus christ.
smart people have smart kids
are you denying that, you naive blankslater?
You just said that the Kardashians were smart, when they've all had their money and opportunities thrown at them. Their wealth has nothing to do with IQ, dummy.
lmao no they didn't
if many of the morons here won the lottery they'd lose the money in 2 or 3 months (see what happened to bitcoin millionaires)
Kardashians inherited a few millions and now they're worth billions, they're high IQ
high IQs always make it to the top regardless of socioeconomic circumstances
>Here's your reality show, clothing line, cosmetics and all you have to do is pose in front of the camera 🙂
Do you actually think that any of them are involved with how their companies run? Am I really having this debate right now?
>Do you actually think that any of them are involved with how their companies run?
lmao, lol even
No, they don't know, they don't NEED to know for the same reason they don't know how to clean a toilet
the higher IQ the more time you have to spent your time on otium negotium and creativity, instead of being a wagie lmfao
>invokes the phrase "otium negotium" without a shred of irony
You really are just a pseud, aren't you? I don't know why you're choosing to die on this hill of "the Kardashians are totally smart!", but I think i've had enough. It's stupid, it's gay, and quite frankly it's just disgusting.
>NO IM SMARTER THAN KARDASHAINS BECAUSE I CAN USE EXCEL!!!!
have it your way wagie but don't forget who tried to show you the light
The low IQ pleb gets triggered by a high IQ word
>otium negotium
He who does not know how to use leisure
has more of work than when there is work in work.
For to whom a task has been set, he does the work,
desires it, and delights his own mind and intellect:
in leisure, a mind does not know what it wants.
The same is true (of us); we are neither at home nor in the battlefield;
we go here and there, and wherever there is a movement, we are there too.
The mind wanders unsure, except in that life is lived.
lol gay redditor pseud
samegay
Their popularity was astroturfed out of this world
so was the northman and i don't see you complaining
astroturf made by high IQs succeeds, whereas dogshit sales speeches fail
You fool, they weren’t comparing it for narrative reasons, they were talking about why it bombed at the box office. Braveheart is very bombastic and American while The Northman is bleak with little action between scenes and is more thematic. Everyone and their dog knows about the Amleth thing. Did you want them to just repeat things you already knew? Why watch things to validate your opinion when you already know what you think?
Can you stop tonguing Jay and Mike's balls and ass for more than 5 minutes please?
>Is there a better example of the Dunning-Kruger effect
yeah pic related
theyll never be your friends so stop trying.
I wasn't defending RLM, I was making fun of the homosexual OP. If I were friends with RLM I'd probably have to hang out with Aids Moby and I'd unironically rather kill myself.
>Is there a better example of the Dunning-Kruger effect?
Yes. You, today, making this post. All this effort to punch up at a bunch of friends with middling knowledge of the film industry and film making in general who have carved out a very successful existence talking about movies on Youtube and making silly jokes.
Jay is such a brainlet it's insufferable.
And Mike is just insufferable on his own.
Do something more useful with your time and learn to think for yourself rather than having idiots tell you what you think of films.
Holy shit Rich Evans married a troony.
>And Mike's knowledge of history is so atrocious
Yeah that was really bad. Its like the only knowledge of history they have comes from shitty "gritty" modern movies.
When he talked about bathing and teeth i knew this guy never read a book in his life, people are in worse shape, worse health, not better.
Sitting all day on your ass is not more healthy than working on the field. Your hands may be smoother, but your back is fricked and you wont be able to move by your 60ties while even our grandparents were spry in that age.
the average peasant rarely ate meat but mostly potatoes
didn't have enough water to wash his ass because the vegetables need the water more
and lived in a clunky house with the rest of his family and family in law
Bro, im from an eastern european country and my great grandmother was still alive when i was a kid, she lived in a remote village with no city plumbing or electricity.
Not only did she had water from a well and there was a local stream, she also had plenty of meat as there was more chicken, ducks local butcher with pigs and cows, more animals than you knew what to do with.
I know very well how a village life looks like, and its sure as frick no israelite living in dirt fantasy, as a kid i spend years there, there were always other kids my age and we would frick around in the day, wash in cold water in when it was warmer, and heat it up on a cast iron stove in winter. Just read a book from 300 years ago, those written in English can still be read today.
But hey, a 45year old university professor israelite will tell me how life looked centuries ago and i should believe him and not my lying eyes.
>Bro, im from an eastern european country
And you didn't live in a vacum
Even if your country was a shithole you had the highly industrialized Soviets as your neighbors
all that abundance of meats was thanks mostly to them not your great grandma subsistence farming
You saying soviets were rising our chickens not us?
Enlighten me please what did a half developed city infrastructure 100km away did for my granny.
Did they dig our well? No, my great grand father did together with local folks. Did they build our barns? Frick no. did they provide the chicken and food for them? Did they plow the fields and tend to the gardens? Did they chop and gather the wood for winter? The frick did the soviets do, enlighten me.
The only useful thing they ever did was drag some power cables 100 years behind the rest of the world, since normally the closest small store was a 1 hour bicycle drive away and you could buy shit all there.
You are just like those israelites, you pull some claim out of your ass with nothing to back it up.
>didn't have enough water to wash his ass because the vegetables need the water more
Where the frick did you get this from?
Especially in Britain, you're never far from water. The sea, rivers etc. If you couldnt bathe in a body of water, you would draw water from a well. And water from a well doesn't fricking go on crops. Medieval peasants didn't have irrigation, they took whatever came from the sky.
You're wrong on so many levels.
lmao
good luck washing your ass with salty water
Did you read that in the unabomber manifesto?Prior to the 20th century people literally did nothing to take care of their teeth and would die as soon as they got a bad tooth. You fricking luddites live in a fantasy world.
>and would die as soon as they got a bad tooth
And yet every other animal has no such problem.
Have yet to see a wild dog have its teeth rot out of his skull, and yet they eat every piece of shit they can find.
How come?
What even is your argument supposed to be? I never criticized dogs
We are no different from any animal on this planet, and our closest cousins, the chimps, have teeth strong enough to eats rocks and dont have them rot out of their skull making them drop dead.
Why would we be any different? Teeth problems is a modern thing, from eating shit and sugar
They deadass had toothbrushes fr
God I love schizo threads
>Refuse to watch mainstream stuff because they consider themselves above it
>Constantly shit on low budget stuff for not having A list actors or amazing cgi
It's amazing how pretentious they are
> >Refuse to watch mainstream stuff because they consider themselves above it
Yeah I wish they would stop reviewing these unknown low budget movies like Doctor Strange and the newest Matrix movie
>posting blatant lies for easy (you)s
Northman was trash it's time to get over it.
Why exactly are you so eager to defend these mediocre boomers?
Is there a better example of being annoyingly pedantic than this post?
Imagine being this fricking stupid.
Get your shit together, Cinemaphile.
i'm sure they think they're smarter than the average Transformers fan, but you are the one who has elevated their supposed intelligence when its really not there. When *you* stop assuming they're smart then when they're dumb you won't be confused.
>see rlm thread
>*sigh* here we go again
>*click*
>AHURRRRRRRRRR DURRRRRRRRRR
>PEE PEE CACA POO POO
>OPEN A DICTIONARY
>WASH YOUR ASS
>Is there a better example of the Dunning-Kruger effect?
Yes
redpill me on this guy
Fatass who thinks characters making bad decisions or convenient things happening in service to the plot means the movie is bad
>their filmic analysis isn't rigorous enough for me
>why are they comparing it to other historical dramas when they should be doing anagram
OP, you're a midwit. Go back to your word jumbles
Yes. I too despise the fact that they hate capeshit yet dedicate the vast majority of their reviews to solely marvel schlop. Fricking hack homosexuals.
>movie critics
>spend years convincing people they know what they're talking about
>finally get a chance to make their own movie and show those industry hacks how it should be done
>it's shit HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Every fricking time. Every single fricking time. This is the fate of all armchair critics. They critique because they can't do.
Make a better movie than Spacecop before you criticize it then
>Y-You do it then!!!
Absolutely pathetic. Even Youtube videos of keyblade parking lot fights were put together better than Space Crap.
>>Y-You do it then!!!
That was literally what you said about all critics then
I'm not a film critic and I don't make movies. I'm a published author and poet.
>poet
lmao go back to r*ddit
yes, you do it. if one must make in order to critique, you make a movie autist
>As if people in the past couldn't fricking bathe or wash their clothes.
People in the middle ages literally considered bathing unhealthy
That's YouTube in a nutshell, OP.
You find the channel that matches your level of inexpertise
if you expect decent film discourse from a youtube channel i don't know what to tell you
>pleb leddit memeia
>israelite cucklasa
>gay bugsmen
>b***h evans
>aids moby
who the frick is that fat guy with the beard and glasses in some of their videos? did they just recruit some homeless guy from outside of a dunkin donuts or something?
The best example of the DK effect is the people who use the term DK effect because its a bullshit pants on head moronic "study"
Well reasoned and good post, OP for once wasn't a homosexual.
It's worth watching this entire video if you haven't, it's well researched, presented and very eye opening in showing how little RLM and the like know or portray to know about film. The subject being the Star Wars Prequels.
Hi Rick. You’ve been shilling your moronic video here for two years now and you still haven’t even reached 100k views. Maybe your video isn’t as good as you think it is. I wonder if there’s a term for that kind of over-confidence.
I saw the video posted in a thread almost exactly one week ago, gave it a watch and agreed with it.
The fact that you replied with such emotion is more telling of you as a person and your emotional investment in Youtube reviewers, get help.
>I saw the video a week ago, therefore nobody else could have seen it being shilled here relentlessly for the last two years and been annoyed by that
I have seen RLM being posted for years on here, your point? You didn't refute anything in the video you replied emotionally because you're not emotionally stable.
I'm not interested in debating you, moron.
>Replies to my post
>I'm not interesting in debating you
You replied because you posted in a state of emotion rather than reason and contradict your own statement through your actions. You're no different than a woman.
Mental illness
Northman was dogshit let it go
It's embarrassing how obsessed Cinemaphile used to be with these pseuds.
They’re more obsessed now than they ever have been, except now they mask their obsession with fake hatred.
>used to be
you creepy tv incels sure are a bunch of autistic losers huh? what a life lol so sad
another rlm patreon subscriber coming in and frothing at the mouth because their messiahs are being called out. all youre doing is funding mikes alcoholism you fat frick.
The only rlm member with a decent opinion on things is rich simply because he isnt pretentious, or st least doesnt care about being seen as a "critic", he just gives his opinion and then gets on with his life, which ironically he gets treated like shit by the other two but he builds all the sets and actually has someome to go back to
>I bless the reigns