It was a mediocre movie at best
It was a mediocre movie at best
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8
— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
It was a mediocre movie at best
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8
— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
Boring as fuck as well, keep falling asleep when I try to watch it.
It's the only Tarantino film aside from Jackie Brown that feels like it was made by an adult and not a 14 year old edgelord
Until the ending
The confrontation with the hippies is the best part of the movie.
>The confrontation with the hippies is the best part of the movie.
No, the ending was the best part of the movie.
this
shit was kino for the most part up until that and then is devolves right back into his very worst instincts
you're not shocking us Quinten, you're being crass
It was kino about kino.
Yeah can't remember much besides hippy girls feet and some gore at the end.
slap that review for all cuckantino movies after reservoir dogs
show panty
book is better
holy fuck he's literally 14
Oh but if she did it with two classmates that would be OK?
>soiled pink panties
>bushy brown hair
>thick jungle pubes
>shit stained panties
It's a garden gnome writing about a nigress... right? glad i didn't read the book or see the goyslop video
>Tarantino casually writing his erotic fantasies about an underaged girl
>It's fine in his head because the main character rejects her after 2 paragraphs of in-depth description of how the teenager was masturbating
jesus christ
>dirty hippie
>dirty soiled smelly panties
>dirty unwashed hairy pusy
FINNA BOUTTA GONNA COOM
like all uno farto flicks, it was shit
of course, redditors lap that up and demand more
and tv is the most reddit board
I agree but it was his best
was this scene really necessary?
Margot was hot in it tho.
Yes. Very much so.
It would have been better if it was better lit and her feet were not covered with dirt.
Whatever this deleted scene was would have been better.
>has to wear a black top, cross her legs and fold/cross her arms so you wont notice she has a fridge body
grim
When did 90s mom jeans make a comeback? I've been seeing them a lot recently and I don't get why
Like 2013 lol. They're coming out of fashion with zoomers but it's thrift store millennialcore
2021
quentin keeps that one all for himself
that's most likely some behind the scenes stuff or whatever
That is from the cover for the novelization he did. Presumably (who has even read it?) the deleted scene is in there.
*cringe* why is that 40 year old woman dressing like a teenager?
it was tarantinos most masturbatory movie
every scene felt like him jerking off while writing it
all his films are like this
kill kill is literally "DUDE JAPAN MOVIES LMAO"
Don't you mean bill bill?
He went over the top with the feet in this one, it's probably the only thing wrong with it.
I liked the parts with Leo and Pitt. It wasn't anything too great, but it was comfy. Everything about the Manson family and Tate was a bore.
wtf was the point of this movie
what a huge waste of time
It's a love letter to New Hollywood. It's just a charming buddy movie with the horror of what happened to Sharon Tate still going right above you.
If you don't like it that's fine, it feels almost like a companion piece to The Big Lebowski.
huh? wtf are you talking about you psued
What is pseud about this post. I'm not claiming Once Upon A Time is high art. It's just fun to have Brad Putt and Leo together in a movie together.
>It was a mediocre movie at best
literally every Tarantino movie after Pulp Fiction
imagine getting filtered by tarrantino
retard can't even spell his name right
it was an understated masterpiece.
I had a blast with this movie, it felt like I was just hanging out for the day. Cynics can't take that enjoyment away from me.
its like with most tarantino films: there are good parts in it but way too much of its run time is dedicated for fan service and representing his image as a unique director
>the exact scene where zoomers eyes glaze-over and they get distracted by their phones because they don't know fuck all about the Tate-LaBiancha murders
I fucking love this movie. Best kino with best zoomer filter.
Should have won an Oscar
I enjoyed both Parasite and Once Upon a Time
good year
>slim pickings for this anon
I see what you did there, but seriously Margot Robbie isn't even the hottest version of herself. She's literally a dumpier clone of Jaime Pressly.
>Jaime Pressly
Truth.
Zoomer fags will never accept this though.
The Margot scenes were drawn out and existed purely for the sake of subversion since the audience went in thinking Tate was going to be brutally murdered at the end.
The Leo and Brad scenes were maximum comfy but had little direction. This was further compounded by the numerous tv and film homages scattered throughout that, again, were comfy but bloated.
The film is way too long for a story that says nothing.
The theatrical cut should've been the director's cut, and the the actual theatrical cut should've been an hour shorter.
I have yet to see a video or even a picture of her being genuine. I don't know what it is but I know she's being fake as fuck every second. I wonder how she is in her private life. Are there any reports or gossip? She's kind of weird, but hot yeah.
Movie sucks, probably his shittiest movie along side the Kill Bill movies
The whole Shanon Tate shit was weird. Was boomers forcing something from their youth in that didn't need to be there. I fully expect his next movie to force JFK Jr bullshit into it since they are also obsessed with him
>Was boomers forcing something from their youth
Well that's one way of looking at historical things that happen
>historical things
I would classify this more as a niche historical thing though.
For zoomers who know fuck all about anything before smart phones, sure.
look into her eyes, deep down she knows she floppin
It would have worked better without the Tate angle and had just been a movie about two buddies in the 60s. The movie stopped dead in its tracks whenever that slut was on screen.
>mediocre movie
Yes, like most of his movies.
How many times are you going to make this thread?
until I find the exit
there's no exit
the movie is support message from Tarantino to his buddy Harvey
I'm stunned people didn't get that, and that there was no outrage...
the only movies of his that really stayed with me were inglorious bastards and django
What would it feel like to be inside her while she orgasms bros
Annoying and dumb when all you want to do is nut and then go play video games or whatever and she wants to cuddle and talk about racial equity shit from Twitter or whatever.
>asked about how something would feel on his dick
>spergs out
the movie was very mediocre and even quite dull at some parts throughout until the very ending, was that intentional?
It's a boomer's fan fiction about the Hollywood of his childhood. It's extremely well made, but it's just jacking off 1969/70. Pretty annoying how much buzz this movie got when Hail, Caesar flew so far under the radar.
I literally just rewatched it for the 5th time.
It is kino and Brad Pitt is relentless handsome in it.
Also I was surprised to see the big booba girl that /misc/ loves in it. I never noticed it until my 5th rewatch.
Who?
Yeah, Sydney's a minor Manson girl, like Kevin Smith's talentless daughter.
Don't open. Final warnig.
Yeah, I didn't care for this movie; now I'm reading the novelization of it to see if I like it more.
Movie? Nah you got it all wrong partner. It's a hang sesh brah.