>Look, imagine us as being on this piece of paper >Now in order to go to the other side we have to travel a long distance right? >Now imagine as reality as this piece of paper >Instead of traveling all over it, we could fold it >And then just
*Grabs pencil*
*Sticks pencil through* >Travel through it, as some sort of wormhole
the story takes place in the late 2070s (initially) from what I recall, if you consider the technological difference between 1940 and 1975, or 1990 and today, wouldn't you consider big technological leaps possible?
obviously the movie is all "dude science lmao" and has montages instead of showing years upon boring as frick years of actual science
>Thor: Love and Thunder
God I fricking hate that scene so much.
Like, I don't mind the actual trope. What kills me, is that the b***h is sitting in therapy for cancer. Most of the people in that room are probably not going to make it. The random dude sitting next to her is probably reading one of the last books he's ever going to read. Her idea: >"Hey, give me that for a moment." >rips a page out of the book >pushes pencil through it, destroying it further >explains wormholes in a way that didn't even really use the demonstration she made
They really just decided to make basically the hero of the story the biggest c**t imaginable.
I don't care how many people she saves after that point. Even Tony Fricking Stark wouldn't have pulled that kind of shit while drunk off his ass on some guy battling cancer.
>Tony Fricking Stark wouldn't have pulled that kind of shit while drunk off his ass on some guy battling cancer.
Stark misled an autist cripple into going on to a roof, knowing full well he wouldn't meet him. Said autist cripple nearly suicided himself over it until he decided to become the mandalorian or whatever
Correction:
He wouldn't have pulled that during his hero phase after the reality check he got at the start of Iron Man 1.
Yeah, he was a scumbag before, but he got punished for it, and only afterwards did he become a hero.
>I don't care how many people she saves after that point.
Isn't the whole plot that the godkiller is killing gods we've never heard of and only them? She saved no mortal lives the entire movie. Wouldn't have if godkiller succeeded either.
That is the main plot, yeah, but there was also some big battle in a crowd at one point, which is the first time Thor and Jane reunite, so I think there was some strings attached where there was constant collateral on the hunt for gods? I'm not sure, and I don't wanna rewatch the movie to figure out why they were fighting in a crowd.
Maybe it was a crowd of Asgardians? The way the movies portrayed them, most of them are basically just civillians with Buster Keaton durability.
>He wouldn't have pulled that during his hero phase after the reality check he got at the start of Iron Man 1.
its a major plot point of the third fillum lad. please dont simp so hard for a goddamn movie character. its okay for tony to be a piece of shit
11 months ago
Anonymous
>its a major plot point of the third fillum lad
It is.
It also happens in a flashback to 1999, which is years before Iron Man 1's reality check.
Please read before replying.
11 months ago
Anonymous
no i understood exactly what you were saying. its just that, what you were saying was incredibly stupid so i thought i would help you out.
11 months ago
Anonymous
So... Your counter to "he wouldn't do that after 2007" (or whenever Iron Man 1 is actually set) is "but he did do it in 1999"?
Okay buddy.
Also, as a side note, you do realize the whole reason we're having this conversation, is that I explicitly brought up Tony Stark as an example of the biggest piece of shit out of the main heroes Marvel has, to compare how even he's better than pulling something like that?
I gotta check because somehow you seem to have taken away that I think Tony is not a piece of shit which is an interesting take away.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>he wouldnt have done this thing that he actually did
thats your point. dont reply to me again
11 months ago
Anonymous
It literally isn't my point, as I explained.
Do not use capital letters.
11 months ago
Anonymous
There are a couple of threads on the board right now where anons can't seem to follow a stream of logic through the conversation. I don't know if it's the same couple of anons or wtf is going on.
>I don't care how many people she saves after that point.
Isn't the whole plot that the godkiller is killing gods we've never heard of and only them? She saved no mortal lives the entire movie. Wouldn't have if godkiller succeeded either.
>They really just decided to make basically the hero of the story the biggest c**t imaginable.
It's in her contract to write her characters that way.
>I don't care how many people she saves after that point.
Isn't the whole plot that the godkiller is killing gods we've never heard of and only them? She saved no mortal lives the entire movie. Wouldn't have if godkiller succeeded either.
She helped save the kids that he was holding hostage.
They were random ass alien kids that lost their families and homes because of Thanos or whatever. They only got god-like powers when Thor gave them a termporary powerup.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Now that I think about it, I'm not even sure what the frick happened in Thor 1 supposedly.
Like, Thor gets de-powered, but I'm wondering, given how common Asgardians are portrayed later, if that is actually the way Asgardians are usually, if they don't have magic/tech/whatever.
Depowered Thor survived getting hit by a truck twice with minor bruising, one time after falling out of the sky, but aside from that he's just some buff dude who can pull Arnold Schwarzenegger movie tier feats, and that's about it. Would that be the limit of what an Asgardian can normally take?
I'm starting to think part of the reason Love and Thunder didn't work for people might be that we don't even know what would be a bad scenario for the primary victims of the antagonist.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Dunno in MCU, haven't been following much from it either, for example I haven't watched all Thor movies.
But Asgardians in the comics are superhuman, they're basically human looking aliens but the low tier Asgardian still can lift tons over their heads, impervious to small caliber guns, immune to most diseases and poisons and live centuries. Someone like Thor or other noble Asgardians are wayy above that.
I remember a rabble of "townfolk" Asgardians tearing Doombots to shreads with their bare hands and most of them surviving their plasma beams.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Nobody cares nerd
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Would that be the limit of what an Asgardian can normally take?
In Endgame he uses his body to channel an energy blast from a dying star.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah but I'm not talking about Thor, I'm talking about the average Asgardian.
Captain America can pull shit no other human could, and the best he's got is some ghetto ass mad science juice some dude cooked up in the middle of World War 2.
Meanwhile, Thor's the heir of the most powerful and influential person in Asgard, bestowed with every single advancement avaiable to them, only to be reduced to, again, some buff dude if that shit is taken away.
Jane's character is basically: "I study wormholes." up until Thor 3.
That's basically the reason.
She needed to have an early scene where she does the one thing that defines her as a character.
this shit is so fricking stupid "hurr durr just fold space time!" okay, lets assume you can, what happens to everything else around you if you're folding space time and punching a pencil through it? its a fine visual for absolute morans
IN ENGLISH DOC
>Look, imagine us as being on this piece of paper
>Now in order to go to the other side we have to travel a long distance right?
>Now imagine as reality as this piece of paper
>Instead of traveling all over it, we could fold it
>And then just
*Grabs pencil*
*Sticks pencil through*
>Travel through it, as some sort of wormhole
Sir that technology hasn't been invented yet
>Well actually, it has, but it's super secret
TUDUDUUDUDUDUDUD
the story takes place in the late 2070s (initially) from what I recall, if you consider the technological difference between 1940 and 1975, or 1990 and today, wouldn't you consider big technological leaps possible?
obviously the movie is all "dude science lmao" and has montages instead of showing years upon boring as frick years of actual science
Nerd virgin with leatherman on table
Name 5 movies/shows that do that.
You can't use Event Horizon, Stargate (movie and shows) and Interstellar
>It's impossible to name five movies and shows
>Unless....
Thor: Love and Thunder
Event Horizon
Stargate (movies and shows)
Interstellar
I told you couldn't use Even Horizon, Stargate or Interstella. I win
Go be a Black person somewhere else.
Really? I'm not seeing that requirement anywhere in this thread...
Literally here:
>Thor: Love and Thunder
God I fricking hate that scene so much.
Like, I don't mind the actual trope. What kills me, is that the b***h is sitting in therapy for cancer. Most of the people in that room are probably not going to make it. The random dude sitting next to her is probably reading one of the last books he's ever going to read. Her idea:
>"Hey, give me that for a moment."
>rips a page out of the book
>pushes pencil through it, destroying it further
>explains wormholes in a way that didn't even really use the demonstration she made
They really just decided to make basically the hero of the story the biggest c**t imaginable.
I don't care how many people she saves after that point. Even Tony Fricking Stark wouldn't have pulled that kind of shit while drunk off his ass on some guy battling cancer.
>Tony Fricking Stark wouldn't have pulled that kind of shit while drunk off his ass on some guy battling cancer.
Stark misled an autist cripple into going on to a roof, knowing full well he wouldn't meet him. Said autist cripple nearly suicided himself over it until he decided to become the mandalorian or whatever
Correction:
He wouldn't have pulled that during his hero phase after the reality check he got at the start of Iron Man 1.
Yeah, he was a scumbag before, but he got punished for it, and only afterwards did he become a hero.
That is the main plot, yeah, but there was also some big battle in a crowd at one point, which is the first time Thor and Jane reunite, so I think there was some strings attached where there was constant collateral on the hunt for gods? I'm not sure, and I don't wanna rewatch the movie to figure out why they were fighting in a crowd.
Maybe it was a crowd of Asgardians? The way the movies portrayed them, most of them are basically just civillians with Buster Keaton durability.
>He wouldn't have pulled that during his hero phase after the reality check he got at the start of Iron Man 1.
its a major plot point of the third fillum lad. please dont simp so hard for a goddamn movie character. its okay for tony to be a piece of shit
>its a major plot point of the third fillum lad
It is.
It also happens in a flashback to 1999, which is years before Iron Man 1's reality check.
Please read before replying.
no i understood exactly what you were saying. its just that, what you were saying was incredibly stupid so i thought i would help you out.
So... Your counter to "he wouldn't do that after 2007" (or whenever Iron Man 1 is actually set) is "but he did do it in 1999"?
Okay buddy.
Also, as a side note, you do realize the whole reason we're having this conversation, is that I explicitly brought up Tony Stark as an example of the biggest piece of shit out of the main heroes Marvel has, to compare how even he's better than pulling something like that?
I gotta check because somehow you seem to have taken away that I think Tony is not a piece of shit which is an interesting take away.
>he wouldnt have done this thing that he actually did
thats your point. dont reply to me again
It literally isn't my point, as I explained.
Do not use capital letters.
There are a couple of threads on the board right now where anons can't seem to follow a stream of logic through the conversation. I don't know if it's the same couple of anons or wtf is going on.
>I don't care how many people she saves after that point.
Isn't the whole plot that the godkiller is killing gods we've never heard of and only them? She saved no mortal lives the entire movie. Wouldn't have if godkiller succeeded either.
I think it perfectly encapsulates how out of touch celebrities, elites, Hollywood and journos are
>They really just decided to make basically the hero of the story the biggest c**t imaginable.
It's in her contract to write her characters that way.
She helped save the kids that he was holding hostage.
>She helped save the kids that he was holding hostage.
Weren't they the kids of gods and thus also gods?
They were random ass alien kids that lost their families and homes because of Thanos or whatever. They only got god-like powers when Thor gave them a termporary powerup.
Now that I think about it, I'm not even sure what the frick happened in Thor 1 supposedly.
Like, Thor gets de-powered, but I'm wondering, given how common Asgardians are portrayed later, if that is actually the way Asgardians are usually, if they don't have magic/tech/whatever.
Depowered Thor survived getting hit by a truck twice with minor bruising, one time after falling out of the sky, but aside from that he's just some buff dude who can pull Arnold Schwarzenegger movie tier feats, and that's about it. Would that be the limit of what an Asgardian can normally take?
I'm starting to think part of the reason Love and Thunder didn't work for people might be that we don't even know what would be a bad scenario for the primary victims of the antagonist.
Dunno in MCU, haven't been following much from it either, for example I haven't watched all Thor movies.
But Asgardians in the comics are superhuman, they're basically human looking aliens but the low tier Asgardian still can lift tons over their heads, impervious to small caliber guns, immune to most diseases and poisons and live centuries. Someone like Thor or other noble Asgardians are wayy above that.
I remember a rabble of "townfolk" Asgardians tearing Doombots to shreads with their bare hands and most of them surviving their plasma beams.
Nobody cares nerd
>Would that be the limit of what an Asgardian can normally take?
In Endgame he uses his body to channel an energy blast from a dying star.
Yeah but I'm not talking about Thor, I'm talking about the average Asgardian.
Captain America can pull shit no other human could, and the best he's got is some ghetto ass mad science juice some dude cooked up in the middle of World War 2.
Meanwhile, Thor's the heir of the most powerful and influential person in Asgard, bestowed with every single advancement avaiable to them, only to be reduced to, again, some buff dude if that shit is taken away.
Why did they have to explain wormholes anyway? Don't they have all sorts of ftl spaceships and portals in mcu by now?
Jane's character is basically: "I study wormholes." up until Thor 3.
That's basically the reason.
She needed to have an early scene where she does the one thing that defines her as a character.
Stranger Things?
moronic b***h
Wrinkle in Time (at least in the books)
Rick and morty
Star Trek (wanna say tng?)
Deja Vu (the laser pointed at the lampshade)
Bill and Ted
why don't they just dig a hole?
this shit is so fricking stupid "hurr durr just fold space time!" okay, lets assume you can, what happens to everything else around you if you're folding space time and punching a pencil through it? its a fine visual for absolute morans
>what happens to everything else around you
It folds with knowing it because science.
It's like a balloon and something bad happens
>fold space time to catch assailant
>he unfolds it then origamis it the other way
>tfw he actually manages to push the pen through the paper
FOLD SPACE
FOLD PIZZA