Its over, roilanders

It’s over, roilanders

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wasn't he innocent?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      doesn't matter. In 2024 if you are a man in power you are guility until proven innnocent and most of the time a single accustion even if disproven will forever ruin you. Plus dude was lazy and pothead so they had extra incentive to get rid of him. The scarest thing is he was a cocreator of this,so he can get his creation taken from him,anyone can.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >so he can get his creation taken from him,anyone can.
        Not necessarily.
        You only have your creation taken away from you if you sell it to a corporation. The moment someone at Warner Bros. greenlit Rick and Morty for Adult Swim, it stopped belonging to the creators.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This happened to Savino too didnt it?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, same with Lasseter with Toy Story, and thats why Toy Story 4 came out that way.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, the only exception is if you somehow managed to get a contract that explicitly states that they can't use the IP without your permission, like the Ed, Edd, and Eddy guy did.
          That said, you need some tremendous pull to get anything like that anymore because companies will never allow that to happen these days.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            then more people need to fight for this and end this corporate bullshit

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the only exception is if you somehow managed to get a contract that explicitly states that they can't use the IP without your permission, like the Ed, Edd, and Eddy guy did.
            That happened like 30 years ago and was EXCEEDINGLY rare even then.
            People keep holding Antonucci up as some sort of golden example, but the truth is he got really fricking lucky by being at the right place at the right time and was able to leverage a bidding war (which had more to do with networks dealing with FOMO than his show specifically).
            Notice that the same thing hasn't happened since. These days the only way to have a show made and keep the rights is to go indie which means you're budget will be a tiny fraction, you'll have to hire students, you'll constantly be broke and need to shill extra merchandise/patreons to limp to the finish line, and you'll receive almost no money on the backend.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Plus dude was lazy and pothead so they had extra incentive to get rid of him. The scarest thing is he was a cocreator of this,so he can get his creation taken from him,anyone can.

        Same shit happened to Chris Savino out spite

        >inb4 SAVINO IS GUILTY GAIIISSS cope

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He was found guilty by the court of public opinion. Everything else is irrelevant.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As a matter of fact that’s exactly what it means

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Meant to reply to

          >who was found innocent
          case thrown out without verdict =/= found innocent

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes but he was not clear of his other shit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, the charges were dropped, but he wasn't "found innocent."

      You're free to choose your own interpretation of what that means, but factually, no court found him guilty or innocent.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You're free to choose your own interpretation of what that means
        not really, a charge dropped means there is no evidence to support it.
        Crying that he wasn't found "innocent" is pure cope, there are no charges is like getting upset that someone hit you with his car when that person doesn't even have a car.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No, it means the person pressing charges walked away from the case. There's a good chance it's because she was lying or otherwise had no proof, but that doesn't mean it's guaranteed to be what happened.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There’s just as likely the chance that she was worried about getting doxxed. R&M fans are hyper dedicated tards and all it would take is one person going to the trial to see her face, figuring out who she was, and blabbing online and it would be Szechuan sauce all over again except dipshits would be hounding one girl instead of fast food franchises.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          A dropped charge can mean several things. It can be insufficient evidence, uncompelling evidence, lack of funds, contradictory testimony, etc.

          In general, dropped charges are because the prosecuting lawyers don't believe they have enough to get a guilty verdict. It does not mean that there is NO evidence at all.

          The reason why the difference is important, and not cope as you put it, is that because the charges are dropped now, if more evidence was accumulated later, lawyers can make the same accusation and take him to court later. If he had been found innocent, bringing up charges for those same crimes becomes near-impossible.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Was he found guilty or definitively proven do have done anything wrong? Because if not then he is innocent, that’s how the system works.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Innocent until proven guilty doesn't mean no actual wrong-doing was committed, just that you cannot accuse and levy legal punishment upon someone, like jailtime, fines, etc, without a proper trial first. No trial means he wasn't convicted of anything, not that he didn't do anything wrong.

              For instance, if you shoplift something, but are never caught, it doesn't mean you are innocent. You stole something. That is a crime. However, unless you are actually charged and convicted, there will be no punishment from the legal system. You're still a thief, but unless someone wants to go out of their way to prove it and spend the legal fees, time, and effort to prove it, you cannot be punished for your crime.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the people claiming that not going to court is the same as exoneration are bad-faith actors. They know the difference but they just want to be antagonistic.
                Funny how They can be just as sure about Roiland's innocence as they will be about Hirsch's 'guilt' (despite the latter not having been accused of anything).

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you love communism?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >it means there is no evidence
          It means there's not enough evidence to get a conviction or the person pressing charges ran out of legal money.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > or the person pressing charges ran out of legal money.
            This was a criminal trial, not a civil one. The state pays for that.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It means the DA pulled some strings and got the case dropped, as in not allowed to go forward. Not that he was innocent. Not that there wasn't evidence. Not that they found something that totally exonerated him. Just that the case was not taken to court. Please learn how these things actually work.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The rule of law is innocent until proven guilty.
        If you are found not guilty then you are found innocent.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >If you are found not guilty then you are found innocent.
          Imagine being this stupid. The wording is very intentional. You are NOT found innocent, it simply means that there is not enough evidence to determine guilt. Your line of thinking would mean that OJ was found innocent, but you’re probably too young for that example to work.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Actually OJ was found liable by a civil court later.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Acquittal is being found not guilty by a jury or a bench trial.
            OJ was acquitted in '95. It's different from the Roiland case because Roiland's case never saw trial. OJ's did.
            You're not wrong about the former instance, he wasn't found not guilty. But the two cases here were different.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Oj was innocent though

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Are you from a backwards speaking universe?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The murderer's gloves and the gloves didnt fit OJ. It literally cannot have been him

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                he took pills to make his hands swell up. brilliant move

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What if OJ murdered someone while wearing ill-fitting gloves?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                his son did it for him

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I never really understood that argument. It always seemed like the gloves fit fine to me.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hey homosexual, you are supposed to prove someone guilty, not innocent, if its not found guilty for whatever reason, lack of evidemce or simply dismiss (more then often because of weak or lack of evidence), THEN HE IS FRICKING INOCCENT.

        Go die, Go to hell and Get fricked over, order may vary.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How many times do you morons need to be told there's no status of "innocent" in American criminal law? One is found either guilty or not guilty, never innocent. I can already feel the anon readying his hands to type a reply about how defendants are [presumed] innocent until proven guilty. Irrelevant. It doesn't make "innocent" a verdict someone can receive in a criminal trial in the U.S.

          And nothing I just said applies to Justin Roiland because his case was dropped for unknown reasons before it went to trial. There are several reasons why the charges could've been dropped that don't preclude the chance that he really did it, and others that don't preclude the chance that he truly is innocent of the crimes.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Modern courts don't find you innocent, they prove you're guilty. Dropping the charges is a tacit admission that they were unwinnable because there is no proof. In human countries, innocence is the default presumption.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nah, by all legal rights he was innocent and it's not the public's place to say he isn't just because they feel like it, but there's also a difference between "guilty" and "I just don't like him" and the latter is absolutely fair play according to everyone that worked with him that was probably waiting for some reason to give him the boot

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There are murderers who are presumed innocent for decades until advances in science can undeniably prove their guilt. Legally they have the presumption of innocence - that's not in question. However, that doesn't mean that for 30 years they didn't commit the murder and then one day they retroactively did. They were guilty of committing that crime all along, but were not able to suffer legal consequences until it was deemed they were guilty by the court of law. Conversely, some innocent people are found guilty by the courts. This doesn't mean that they actually did it, but it DOES mean they can legally suffer punitive damages as a result.

          You seem to think the presumption of innocence is some magically ordained status that changes reality. All it means is that someone can't be punished by the state or federal system for something unless they are legally proven to have done it. Roiland wasn't sent to prison or forced to do community service. He does have the legal presumption of innocence. It doesn't mean that people can't keep their distance from him.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            that's a lot of words to say "I still don't like him"

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I still don't like him and he might have actually done it
              ftfy

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol dude you don't need to morally grandstand over the "defenders" on an indonesian surfboard wax forum I don't like him either

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >morally grandstand
                I'm not saying I don't like him BECAUSE he may be a domestic abuser.
                Same could be said for John K. Guy is a self-aggrandizing unreliable hack...there are plenty of reasons to dislike him even if he solely enjoyed the company of age-appropriate women.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >indonesian surfboard wax forum
                you make Cinemaphile sound like it's actually cool.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >FRICK PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE, OBEY
            >NO I AM NOT A COMMIE

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              reading comprehension isn't really your thing
              Maybe you should have paid more attention in school.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hello mr pot have you met mr kettle?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just recently a dude was fired and spent 30 days in jail on sexual assault allegations because police didn't bother to check security footage that would've immediately cleared him.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Can I get a quick rundown?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dirty anti-cop propaganda.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Innocent in the eyes of the law, guilty of being a cringe lord homosexual who texts teenagers and guilty of fricking off and playing with toys at work instead of contributing anything

      • 3 weeks ago
        Sage

        He was difficult to work with and when an opportunity presented itself to give him the boot, they took it.

        Correct, people shouldn’t conflate his situation with standard metoo bullshit. He was a burden the team wanted to be rid of, him being a shitter just made that easy.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          how could he be a burden to the team when he was the boss?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He wasn't. Harmon was always in charge.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              To this point, Harmon himself has gone through his own version of metoo stuff, and came out mostly fine.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He was difficult to work with and when an opportunity presented itself to give him the boot, they took it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If he's a liability and nobody likes him, why is it a surprise he was removed? Look at James Gunn. He was fired over stuff he did but everyone loved him and the GotG actors rallied behind him. He kept quiet and was professional about it and got his job back. That's not the case with Roiland.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Roiland got caught fricking sending DMs to underage girls and saying actual creepy shit.

        Gunn was just making edgy gross jokes but nothing came out about him actually talking to teenagers.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Of one specific case, maybe. But messages and comments from people who worked with him proved he was guilty of other shit.
      Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein both fought their allegations and reduced their sentences despite everyone knowing they did it. In court of law its all about semantics, if you can prove a specific sequence of events didnt happen, you're innocent, even if you did nasty shit.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Messages and comments of coworkers prove he's guilty.
        I got coworkers that can't even tell what time is it, but I am sure they know perfectly well how somebody is, and so their baseless biased opinion should always be enough to prove somebody else's guilt and this moronic way of thinking will never ever come back to bite me in the ass because I'm certainly not conflictive in any way or form.

        Also,
        >The fat ass asks a 17 year old to write a poem about dicks.
        Oof! Pedophileeeeeee! Keep your 4 year olds at bay! The flatter their chests, the more attracted he is going to be to them!!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein both fought their allegations and reduced their sentences despite everyone knowing they did it. In court of law its all about semantics, if you can prove a specific sequence of events didnt happen, you're innocent, even if you did nasty shit.

        Bill Cosby is not guilty you dirty fricking commie.

        ?feature=shared

        >inb4 RAZ0RFIST BAD

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >listen to my e-celeb
          Nah, frick yourself.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >NO OIGO NO OIGO ONIONS DE PALO
            >NO OIGO NO OIGO ONIONS DE PALO
            >NO OIGO NO OIGO ONIONS DE PALO
            >ONIONS DE JABON Y ME RESBALO

            >homosexualfist

            >RAZ0RMAN BAD

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >homosexualfist

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All men are guilty
      That's why men should remove themselves from society so women can live without fear
      And do all the work and pay all the taxes while men cash their universal basic income and get to do wathever they want while women work 14 hour days to afford expensive bags and trips just so they can share pictures online and get a couple seconds of dopamine when they get likes

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >universal basic income
        I IMMEDIATELY know you'd end your own life living in a pre-suffrage world.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Calm the frick down, white knight.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        bullshit. go seek a therapist, man deserve love and care as much as anyone too, because humans aren't born evil.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nah you should remove yourself instead you homosexual israelite

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        People can post the most obvious inflammatory bait like this and still get (you)s

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >obvious inflammatory bait
          There are enough turbo-tards out there that unfortunately these days it's really difficult to tell.
          There are people who also unironically think the government is putting nano-bots in vaccines to track them or that the world is actually flat and 'round world theory' is a conspiracy spanning several hundred (and in some cases thousand) years. A lot of these people are trolls but then there are always dipshits who buy into it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He was cleared of the domestic charges because of a lack of evidence, but that doesn't necessarily mean he didn't do anything. The reason he was never brought back is because the leaked pedo DMs look way worse and he was apparently ass to work with so no one really vouched for him.

      If he's a liability and nobody likes him, why is it a surprise he was removed? Look at James Gunn. He was fired over stuff he did but everyone loved him and the GotG actors rallied behind him. He kept quiet and was professional about it and got his job back. That's not the case with Roiland.

      Roiland has completely ghosted the world since the allegations came out so he's "keeping quiet" at the very least. The differences between Gunn and Roiland are that Gunn was apparently better to work with and making edgy jokes is a lot different from sending actual sexual DMs to actual underage girls.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Guilty of being cringe

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think the "texting underage girls" allegations ever went away

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just a little bit of drunkenly hitting on teenagers online, nothing weird about that

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not just drunk, anon
        he was saying that he found teenagers hot on a podcast

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I read a rumor that Player First Games were willing to get Roiland in to do the voicelines.
      The problem is he's fricking ridiculously unreliable and difficult to work with, especially when it comes to doing 3rd party voicework for Rick And Morty for some reason.

      That's likely the reason WB kept him fired. There's 1,000,000 dudes who can do the Rick and Morty voices, and they're all probably way better at answering their fricking phones than Roiland is.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why couldn’t they get one to do ricks voice for the show than?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Gamedev takes a long time and the timelines for hiring new voice actors and making the game didn't line up.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Domestic Violence charges were dropped. But considering there's still plenty of evidence of him being inappropriate with minors through text, and the fact that he's difficult to work with and had a history of behind the scenes drama with his works, I can't imagine things getting better for him.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody is 'innocent'. Everyone is guilty of something, and it only needs to be determined what exactly. Why being a LGBT ally is so important, it's the only way to purge yourself of the sin of heteronormativity.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Please, no meat touching, ma'am!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yep
      WUBBA LUBBA DUB DUB!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes but that's not what matters when you're being tried by the social media court system. You could have absolutely nothing to do with anything, it only takes one mentally ill twitter user to point their finger at you and cry rape to have everything in your life taken away from you.
      Chris Avellone, a video game writer who's been working since the 90s, is permanently blacklisted despite the fact that all allegations made against him were proven false and the accusers admitted they were lying. He will never be allowed to work on a video game for the rest of his life.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Accusations > evidence

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      doesn't really matter his main audience was reddit and twitter so if you piss off them you're fricked

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope not.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes but doesnt matter in current stunning and brave America, thanks communists........

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      never convicted and ostensibly innocent but they took the chance to dumpster him anyway because he was apparently a c**t to work with and his biggest contributions were showing up drunk and introducing characters named "Mr. Meeblipztles" or some shit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That and the new guys are good, better in some aspects too.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hes a white straight male. of course hes guilty

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus Christ, why are you all saying "nO, hE'S frickInG InNoCeNt!" ever since the allegations dropped? Literally beforehand you all hated the guy and wanted him dead, yet now you like him! What the frick?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nice bait, but......

        ?feature=shared

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Win or lose you still lose, that's how our society is.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The lengths they go to and money they waste cancelling someone who was found innocent is pretty horrifying.

    On the other hand Roiland himself is a cuck who would support this shit happening to someone else and i'm tired of defending leftists from the problems they cause

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is Roiland like that too or just Harmon?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >who was found innocent
      case thrown out without verdict =/= found innocent

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The lengths they go to and money they waste cancelling someone

      Roiland didn't even do work on this game other than lend his permission to make characters based on Rick and Morty. Shitass couldn't even be bothered to do voice work for a video game.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    reap what you sow motherfricker

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ruined.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      t. obese manchild

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      checked
      Yes.

      The new rick is fine but the new morty is still grating.

      Can't tell. The show got slightly better (it is still shit).

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just in Roiland

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    all the pedos who support this creep are in shambles

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >too lazy to do some voices and yells and grunts
    it's a testament to how profoundly useless Justin is

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The one thing I don’t u sweats d is if there’s text messages proving he hit on little girls that would be pedophilia. If these leaked text messages are true how isn’t he in jail that proof right there he’s guilty of being a sexual predator. Why isn’t he in jail than are these text messages bullshit. Unless someone can explain how.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The girl was 16 and the texts were nothing you massive homosexual

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good, now we can have Rick and Morty actually interact with the other characters.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You know, out of all the things I thought would be brought back from the past, Damnatio Memoriae is not one of them.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    brb buying it but not gonna use ut

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why are people still talking about the court case? what got him canceled was the, you know, messaging inappropriate texts to underage girls.

    is this the pedophile deflecting tactic now? trying to bring attention to the court case in hopes that people will forget about the pedo thing?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the texts all got published, but cn got the emails that went
      >roiland flew me to california when I was fifteen and he and his girlfriend fricked me.
      >i'm not totally blameless, but you should really keep on eye on that guy

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >why are people still talking about the court case? what got him canceled was the, you know, messaging inappropriate texts to underage girls.
      Odd, I remember Adult Swim canning him before those came to light, but after the arrest was announced.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You've got the timeline wrong. The domestic violence allegation came before the messages.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Irrelevant, there's nothing against firing someone for being an insufferable c**t. It happens all the fricking time, you just want to cry bloody murder because muh fricking culture war

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The new rick is fine but the new morty is still grating.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i concur. Morty sounds like he's been permanently kicked in the balls now.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Skullgirls dev accuses the creator of the game about harassments
    >kicked the creator, took the game for themselves
    >R&M staff accuses the creator of the franchise about harassments.
    >kicked the creator, took the franchise for themselves

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Its part of the Gramschie Keikaku, no bullshit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hot

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That thing about skullgirls can someone tell me more

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer game-specific lines anyway, it's less lazy.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm very sure the majority of Rick's and Morty's voice lines were just audio ripped from the show itself because Roiland was too much of a lazy ass to come into the studio to record voicelines. Nothing of value lost.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >audio ripped from the show itself
      That would be just begging for a lawsuit. No reasonably sane producer would ever sign off on that.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I would rather have unique dialogue by an imitator than shitty clunky audio that loosely fits

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What about Kevin Conroy

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    he's fine www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4XHzlasvtc

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *