>the critical grifter >Literally only makes videos on whatever the current right wing outrage mob is seething about >conveniently has the same opinions and persective as the outrage mob >NEVER offers a unique or "controversial" opinion or perspective >all his opinions are SAFE and PREDICTABLE
It's unreal how shameless this guy and all those geeks and gamers grifters are. Their entire YouTube channels are solely based around being outraged by Disney. They don't even have to put any thought or effort into their videos, they can just read comments and parrot all the talking points from other people. Just look at Nerdrotics last 10 videos, 7 of them are Disney outrage. How about critical grifters last 10 videos? BARBIE BAD, OPPENHEIMER GOOD, INDIANA JONES BAD, MISSION IMPOSSIBLE GOOD, SNOW WHITE BAD, SOUND OF FREEDOM GOOD.
What is your argument? That they're wrong or just unoriginal? Would you have the same reaction to a channel full of nothing but "LotR is great ATLA is great The Prestige is great"?
Not him, but I would, unless the analysis was actually truly novel, or somehow featured the creative team being newly interviewed or something.
For example, the Every Frame A Painting guy has a great video on Fincher's skills, but plenty of channels have shit videos on why Fincher is great that say nothing of substance. The latter is critical drinker.
Fair, I guess it's inevitable that the more surface level mass appeal channels are the ones that end up with a frickton of views so I don't really hold it against them. It probably takes him around an afternoon per video as opposed to months and months for more high quality channels hence the more viral nature.
Thought this was a neat, more in depth video but it's the guy's only one.
As bad as this annoying fricker is, it's nowhere near as annoying as people who incessantly complain about watching all his videos and then calling him a "grifter".
>alcoholic mutt fail critic makes a living posting le cartoons are our le heritage videos where he cries about how his favorite cartoon has been ruined for centuries to come
could only imagine the sweaty nerds that like this kind of obviously moronic content
This guy is the biggest hack who ever existed
That’s not a picture of Christopher Nolan
That’s not a picture of Kevin Smith
That's not a picture Jean-Luc Godard.
That’s not a picture of Brett Ratner
That’s not a picture of Ron Howard
That’s not a picture of Denis Villeneuve
That’s not a picture of Quentin Tarantino
That’s not a picture of Rian Johnson
That’s not a picture of [Insert your favourite director here]
That’s not a picture of James Cameron
That's not a picture of Ridley Scott
That’s not a picture of Wes Anderson
That’s not a picture of Steven Spielberg
that's not a picture of hideaki anno
That’s not a picture of Sam Raimi
That's not a picture of Terrence Malick
That’s not a picture of Uwe Boll
That’s not a picture of Jon Favreu
That's not a picture of Neil Breen
That’s not a picture of Sofia Coppola
That’s not a picture of David Bennioff and DB Weiss
That's not a picture of me.
That's not a picture of J.J. Abrams
That’s not a picture of the Cohen brothers
Black person
That’s not a picture of Josh Trank
That's not a picture of Christopher "Moot" Poole
That’s not a picture of Zack Snyder
That’s not a picture of Rob Zombie
That’s not a picture of Robert Rodriguez
That’s not a picture of Stanley Kubrick
That’s not a picture of Harvey Weinstein
That's not a picture of J.J. Abrams
That's not a picture of hideo kojima
Yes, but Hideo Kojima invented the device that took the picture.
Wat
That’s not a picture of Peter Jackson
That’s not a picture of David Yates
That’s not a picture of Alfonso Cuaron
>hack
A hack is someone that just does what the studio wants.
It's insane to me how Cinemaphile's managed to erase the meaning of the word.
That’s not a picture of Tom Burton
That's not a picture of LeBron James
That’s not a picture of Lord and Miller
That’s not a picture of Colin Trevarrow
That’s not a picture of Critical Drinker
Yes it is. What the heck
That’s not a picture of David Bowie
Cinemaphile destroyed in one fell swoop
That’s not a picture of Guillermo del Toro
That’s not a picture of Shane Black
more like Shane Black
Y-ye?
That’s not a picture of Conan O’Brien
That’s not Hacksaw Jim Duggan
That’s not a picture of Roland Emmerich
That's not a picture of Judd Apatow
That's not Kojima tho
Are you proud of yourself gay? Look at all these (you)s you got
That's not a picture of OP
OP? Sure.
That's not a picture of YMSdotcom
This dude sucks though.
>still grifting over snow white, movie over a year from release
He's really desperate for content
Alteori does it better
>right wing media critic
ew.
oxymoron
Why is it bad he's making money about a film nobody wants?
>its up
has never been posted in reference to something that is television or film
Peter Dinklage denying dwarves jobs is even more fricked up tbh
Best thread on this board right now. Well done you memers.
I didn't know that mark webb is the director of this
>the critical grifter
>Literally only makes videos on whatever the current right wing outrage mob is seething about
>conveniently has the same opinions and persective as the outrage mob
>NEVER offers a unique or "controversial" opinion or perspective
>all his opinions are SAFE and PREDICTABLE
It's unreal how shameless this guy and all those geeks and gamers grifters are. Their entire YouTube channels are solely based around being outraged by Disney. They don't even have to put any thought or effort into their videos, they can just read comments and parrot all the talking points from other people. Just look at Nerdrotics last 10 videos, 7 of them are Disney outrage. How about critical grifters last 10 videos? BARBIE BAD, OPPENHEIMER GOOD, INDIANA JONES BAD, MISSION IMPOSSIBLE GOOD, SNOW WHITE BAD, SOUND OF FREEDOM GOOD.
It's all so tiresome
what a hot take
What is your argument? That they're wrong or just unoriginal? Would you have the same reaction to a channel full of nothing but "LotR is great ATLA is great The Prestige is great"?
Not him, but I would, unless the analysis was actually truly novel, or somehow featured the creative team being newly interviewed or something.
For example, the Every Frame A Painting guy has a great video on Fincher's skills, but plenty of channels have shit videos on why Fincher is great that say nothing of substance. The latter is critical drinker.
Fair, I guess it's inevitable that the more surface level mass appeal channels are the ones that end up with a frickton of views so I don't really hold it against them. It probably takes him around an afternoon per video as opposed to months and months for more high quality channels hence the more viral nature.
Thought this was a neat, more in depth video but it's the guy's only one.
That’s not a picture of Ben Affleck
That’s not a picture of George Lucas
grift aside disney needs to die
As bad as this annoying fricker is, it's nowhere near as annoying as people who incessantly complain about watching all his videos and then calling him a "grifter".
Same gay bot thread. Will jannys do their job? Probably not
would you actually try if you employer didn't compensate you with anything?
That’s not a picture of Brendan Schaub
>Critical Drinker fans are closet homos
Not surprising really
>brings up wiener sucking out of nowhere because his mind instantly went to penises after someone said something sucked
Next you're going to tell me you don't vote democrat.
>Blanket assumption about 50 of the population being gay
You see gays everywhere, gayboy.
>That ~~*echo*~~ when drinker mentions "modern audiences"
Is drinker a knower?
why do people still give this guy the time of day when he was filtered by the first Avatar?
That’s not a picture of Robert Altman
That’s not a picture of Rick Burman
This is also a picture of Tom Bortun
Did he poop on that fat boi?
No
Tim Burton made a willy wonka movie?
>alcoholic mutt fail critic makes a living posting le cartoons are our le heritage videos where he cries about how his favorite cartoon has been ruined for centuries to come
could only imagine the sweaty nerds that like this kind of obviously moronic content
i´d rather watch a video reviewing a movie that has already been in cinemas, not that this homosexual is wrong but hey, at least wait a little bit.
>I like it when youtube gay says the same talking points again and again. Also somehow brings up Star Wars in this video.
He said Glass Onion was dumb when it is the single best piece of cinema written since the past twelve years, and a cinematographic masterpiece.
He literally couldn't understand Glass Onion, when even Cinemaphile could and rightly gushed praise over it.
His opinion is invalid.
How much of that video is the same shitty slowed down clips? Frick off with that already, it's obnoxious.
His voice is so annoying.
holy shit do these chudtubers always cause this much seething
What a wonderful man.
MODERN AUDIENCES