So who's gonna play Harley Quinn?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
"Joker 2: Madness for Two" announced
So who's gonna play Harley Quinn?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Is she too old?
She’s slated for Batman, so probably not.
Would
Will they use as source the Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme murder? That shit is pretty disturbing.
What's what dude? Link me upp
Look it up in Google with the names .Can't remember much but apparently it was:
>Two women got so obsessed with each other they couldn't stand the thought of getting separated, so they killed the mother of one of them so they could leave together to another country. One of them manipulated the other into it.
Is that related to the title of the movie? Or a joker comic?
It's a case of Folie a Deux
women am I right fellas
Just look a lesbian domestic abuse rates compared to gays. It's all the evidence you need.
Heavenly Creatures
>they killed the mother of one of them so they could leave together to another country
Bros, why didn't they just leave together to another country, skipping the murder part?
Reese Witherspoon would be great
Pretty sure this film will be Withoutaspoon
Anya Taylor Joy
Jennifer Lawrence
Hopefully we get more backstory on Dunnhier
>madness for two
Folie á deux is a real mental illness in the DSM. You dont have to translate it to burgerspeak
A mental illness? What is the condition?
Google it lazy moon cricket
>Folie á deux
This disorder is not in the current DSM (DSM-5), which considers the criteria to be insufficient or inadequate.
The DSM-5 also thinks homosexuality is not a mental illness so it lacks sufficient and adequate credibility
Based.
Happy Mental Disorder Month
your face when the lingua franca is now English and not French.
it's cringier to use moronic french terms you can't pronounce correctly anyways
Gay, Jennifer lawrence would be better, more mature, this movie needs to be realistic not have some sexy teen for u perverts to lust over
>Hello, I'd like to speak to your manager
>Jennifer lawrence
Looks like a c**ty substitute teacher that goes to antifa rallies on the weekend and avoids shaving her legs and armpits, disgusting!
>Yeah, nah.
Bad poosey
They really missed a big opportunity by not having the batman and joker movies be in the same universe. Both very dark, realistic shit that would have been kino together.
Yeah but they fricked up more by not making Bad Poosey be catwoman.
post bad poosey (3).png daddy needs 2 nut
Only because I need to get banned and spend less time here anyway
Thank you, Sanic
I said WITHOUT onions you blue moron!
Eh the Batman is straight up a gothic romance and joker is more grounded and retro
The Batman fricking SUCKED. Stop trying to suck Joker's success and prestige. It wouldn't make The Batman be any better, it'd just make Joker be worse because now we have to deal with Robert Pattinson's shitty Batman be in the sequel of Joker.
Frick you. Pattinson saved Batman with the most based portrayal of the character since Keaton. I had to sit through facefrick Bale and fatfrick Affleck to finally get to a Batman who was like the comics.
Pattinson would save Phillip's hack writing.
he was good
but keaton is better
The right pic isn't from The Batman. In the movie itself Pattinson looked like a hobo that never left the emo phase
>Pattinson saved Batman with the most based portrayal of the character since Keaton.
He was a twink emo that couldn't fight, couldn't solve a fricking clue, couldn't save anyone, and the end felt sorry for being a vigilante because he was another toxic white male in the city.
The movie sucked, the portrayal sucked. Stop trying to associate Joker with this shit.
>twink
Definitely not a twink
>emo
More damaged than emo. Black eyeliner comes with the cowl
>couldn't fight
Someone didn't watch the movie
>couldn't solve a fricking clue
He solved every riddle
>felt sorry for being a vigilante
More like stopped being a piece of shit so he could actually help people
The movie was great and the portrayal is the best we're ever gonna get. Joker would be lucky to be half as good
He looked exactly the same but had different hair
The armor clearly gets damaged throughout the film. You just weren't paying attention so you could have something to complain about here
>joker's a character study!
More like Taxi Driver and King of Comedy were character studies
>detective noir
The Batman is Sev7n x Zodiac, anon.
>the movie is about finding a killer
>must've ripped off Seven and Zodiac!
The only thing it clearly has from Seven is the villain getting caught, but even so, they worked it well into the plot.
The movie is about finding a killer that leaves clues to solve his identity and at the end gives himself up to reveal an even more hidden secret conspiracy.
I'm not saying it's a bad thing but the story is clearly and homage to Fincher's movies and Chinatown. The same way Long Halloween is basically a ripoff of The Godfather but with added "superhero twist".
>but even so, they worked it well into the plot.
No, they didn't.
>The only thing it clearly has from Seven
No way; that whole squance of them finding his apartment and reading out of his journals is taken almost directly from se7en.
Get this through your head: The Batman was a shitty capeshit movie with all the generic capeshit/action movie tropes you can think of. It was another generic piece of shit. There was nothing smart or interesting about it. It wasn't even original, since it was just WB trying to replicate Nolan and Philliips' movies without understanding them. It was soulless garbage.
For someone trying to suck on Joker's breasts to try and give The Batman any kind of prestige you sure like to pretend as if The Batman is any good. It isn't. So shut up about Joker 2 being tied to that shit ass movie. It isn't going to happen.
I'm not even arguing that they should be together homosexual. I'm saying you shat on an actor who performed well in a role and are defending a soulless, garbage movie about a mentally ill man who becomes a killer clown that ripped off more than it could chew and doesn't answer half the "brilliant" questions it raises.
The Batman and Joker are capeshit. They're both capeshit properties. It looked nothing like Nolan or Phillips because Reeves hired people who actually know how to make movies look good. It was ten times more original than Taxi Joker was.
The Batman is a good flick. I saw it eight fricking times in theaters and saw Joker once. The difference is, I know when something has effort behind it, and when something is blatant awards fodder.
I can't even tell if you're a WB shill, Matt Reeves himself shitposting, or just a random huge homosexual. Either way i am ignoring your ass.
Good. Frick off and think about what you've learned.
>because Reeves hired people who actually know how to make movies look good. It was ten times more original than Taxi Joker was.
homosexual, The Batman doesn't answer any of the question it proposes. You know why? Because at the end the movie falls by the same moronic worldview it criticizes. It creates a Mary Sue character that will fix the problems of the system, with some basic "we must have faith in people" speech, despite the fact at the beginning the same character criticized said worldview. The Batman doesn't answer anything, doesn't solve anything. Instead it pretends it does by saying that the corruption of the city happens thanks to the neglect of the rich and powerful and at the end glorifies a rich and powerful member of the elite without even developing said character. It's a leftist, cowardly movie, that is obviously nothing but propaganda to Kamala Harris. And even worse, the movie at the end has no fricking balls to go against vigilantism because they have to start another cinematic universe. See how easily it is to manipulate the average leftist? The Batman is nothing but propaganda that pretend to be against the same problem it starts: glorifying political parties instead of letting the people have the power of the system for once.
The system is broken dumbass, especially when it's run by corrupted people. The Batman answered the questions it raised, which were: Is Batman helping Gotham, and can Gotham be saved?
If you didn't figure out the answers for both of those by the end of the movie, then you're a tard.
>Is Batman helping Gotham, and can Gotham be saved?
It answers none of this shit because it has to start a whole fricking universe of supervillains, homosexual. That's the point. Compare that to The Dark Knight, where Nolan DID give an answer to what Batman would do in real life, and it's embarrassing how much Nolan's TDK destroys The Batman.
Here's the answer from the fricking film. I guess you missed it.
>Is Batman helping Gotham?
Batman, at this point in his career, has been harming Gotham. By letting himself become known as a vigilante who enacts justice on the guilty, he has caused some good by becoming a symbol of fear, but has let his symbol of revenge inspire others who aren't as morally sound as him. He learns to let go of revenge so that he can actually help Gotham in the future by fighting crime in the name of hope and inspiring others instead of causing the innocent to fear him and the unsound to emulate his principles.
>Can Gotham be saved?
Batman doesn't know. He's hoping that the system cleanse which occurred by him and Riddler's hands can start things anew, but he knows that crime will always exist, and that he'll always need to be around. The end of the film is hopeful, but we all know what will eventually happen to Gotham, black mayor or not.
Stop being a constant pol homosexual and use your head. Nolanshit is basic level.
the last act of the movie is written like a marvel movie with the incel uprising and the shitty tsunami
Riddler has nothing to do with inceldom and the flooding has been his plan all along. It doesn't come from nowhere and fits well with his character.
But myself as well as many others have been explaining this since it came out, but homosexuals just won't listen to common sense.
>Riddler has nothing to do with inceldom
>He learns to let go of revenge so that he can actually help Gotham in the future
Literally worthless. That's the point of The Dark Knight. A vigilante will never "help" a city. A vigilante will only make things worse. That's the point of "the hero Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now," Vigilantism is not the key for anything, or the solution of anything. That was the point of The Dark Knight which it made clear and defended. The Batman clearly wants to do that but can't do because they have to start another cinematic universe. There's no way a vigilante "Let's go of his rage" because he will still beat the shit out of the people he arrests, moron. That's still violence above the law. That's not something the movie addresses or can address. It just ends in a sunny day of Batman carrying people to safety. That's what happens when you make superheroes "realistic" and fight against threats. And the most hilarious thing is how Reeves got so scared he obviously had to let audience know Riddler was "the bad guy" and be a Cinemaphilener, instead of just, you know, making the audience see for themselves he was evil, or insane.
>Batman doesn't know.
The movie does know. It tries to do Long Halloween, but is too cowardly to go full Long Halloween and end it in an ambiguous storyline. Instead, it gives you a "fake-happy ending" despite the whole city being destroyed, another mayor getting elected after 20 years of mayors being corrupted, and Batman leaving next to go beat the shit out of some people. You can't make a vigilante realistic, condemn his actions, then forget about it at the last minute
>, another mayor getting elected after 20 years of mayors being corrupted,
but she was black so that means it's ok
>another mayor getting elected after 20 years of mayors being corrupted
It makes me wonder how would Gotham citizens react to the fact every single mayor they had for the last 20 years has been corrupt, then some chick comes around saying they can still do better after the city is destroyed. It makes Riddler's anger have more sense and I wish they didn't turn him into a full incel schizo but made his motivation have a valid point, that the city was so corrupt everyone thought nothing was ever going to change. Instead they turned him into /misc/.
It's clear that Reeves isn't going to make this mayor character stick. She will die or corruption will sneak in once again. Reeves won't keep everything light. It was a momentary win for Batman that won't last.
It's not about him letting go of his rage for the criminals sake. It's him letting go of his rage for his sake, and the sake of the citizens of Gotham. A citizen took his tactic of fear and revenge and spun it into his own mission. Batman won't stop fighting crime. The movie isn't anti-vigilante whatsoever. It's anti-irresponsibility. If you choose to be a vigilante, you must be more careful with how you go about it. Batman can't run around inspiring fear in everyone and do it in the name of vengeance because it will inspire others to emulate him. Instead, he must let the people of Gotham, people like Riddler, that he's fighting for them and not for himself. And when crime inevitably comes, he will combat it not out of a need to feel good about himself, but out of a hope for a better Gotham.
TDK took the easy, anti-Batman route. It's fine, but it's basic, and it's destroyed in the next film. Reeves has chosen a direction that is pro-Batman and takes a tougher stance by validating something illegal so it might help others in the future.
The fact that you did not understand this shows a lot more about your choice of preference when it comes to capeshit.
not the guy you're arguing with but you make a good argument. tdk is better tho overall.
>And when crime inevitably comes, he will combat it not out of a need to feel good about himself, but out of a hope for a better Gotham.
>"Hey, man. I just want you to know that i am beating your face to a pulp not like, to make myself feel better, but, like... to make kids happy? You got that, right? Just needed for you to know" *goes back to beating the guy up*
That's fricking moronic.
You still seem to assume he's doing this to make criminals feel better? Batman doesn't care how criminals feel as long as they don't die by his or anyone else's hands. He tries to understand them, but he won't pander to them.
How are you this thick?
kek, more like
>I'm beating you to a pulp in a way that won't inspire other people to take up vigilantism because I'm going to help victims of crime after I finish arresting you so that they will know that I take this position seriously and won't want to emulate me.
>random people watching Batman violently beat someone up before arresting them "Hey, that was pretty cool. Maybe i should be like Batman and go around beating people up"
to be fair, batman will always potentially inspire others, but it isn't a bad arc for a batman who won't give up being a vigilante to at least decide to help innocent people while he does it, and continue to fight anyone who potentially copies him negatively.
>anti-Batman
Dude, the whole fricking movie is anti-Batman. It's about how Batman is a toxic rich white male that has to do better with his money, despite the fact Batman has done that since he arrived to Gotham in the comics. The whole leftist brigade of Twitter adores that movie because they say it addresses the "fascist" aspect of Batman. The whole movie is about "deconstructing" Batman's journey in the most stupid way they could think of: by making him an idiot selfish bastard. And no, Batman is not like this in the comics. But let's forget about those for a minute. Reeves himself has stated how he wanted to "mock" the "toxic" worldview Batman has. And the worst part is he failed at that too because
>If you choose to be a vigilante, you must be more careful with how you go about it.
this is impossible. If you are above the law you by default will act above the law, and set an example that is wrong. That's why most Batman stories these days have him fighting against rogues. Because the only way Batman can still exist and have sense is when these supervillains appear. This is what a realistic Batman would be, something Reeves has said many times he wanted to make, but he still can't go further than that. Why? Because the movie is meant to start an universe, not answer any of these questions.
Also they made his parents seem like total complete pieces of shit. (Worse than Joker that actually kept it vague).
No they don't. Battinson's parents are portrayed as good people, Thomas Wayne made a mistake that he instantly regretted and tried to correct (and was killed for trying).
That's what I'm arguing for. Being a vigilante will always result in copycats, but if you're dead set on never stopping, which a good Batman is, then you can at least alter why you're doing what you're doing in hopes that some might not copy you.
A good Batman story has two constants: There are rogues and there is Batman. Nolan wanted to end this, and Reeves wants to keep it going.
That's why Reeves is better.
>That's why Reeves is better.
Reeves tried to portray Batman as judgmental and sexless toxic and privileged white male who only went after petty criminals because he was too emo. Frick Reeves.
Are you the dude that played Batman? Nice job all around bromaster
based
joker was ass...
The Batman is one of the worst cases of political propaganda in years. The solution of the movie is literally "trust the system lmao" despite showing for 2 fricking hours how the system fails people. It does some pathetic twist about Riddler being "le evil incel" because Reeves is too much of a homosexual to let people see for themselves if he was a monster or not. It should've ended when he was captured. And that Harris propaganda truly was terrible.
>twink
I've never seen a twink that looked like that.
They're much leaner.
Pattinson is not realistic having bulletproof armor and flying through the city without dying the Batman was typical comicbook movie is not a character study like Joker was
>acts as if Joker was high art
Joker is the first and only comic book movie to ever to get in a Film Festival and also the first and only one to win. Even if you don't consider it high art it's far more that most capeshit. I don't even dislike The Batman. I'm just saying I would prefer more stories like Joker than that. I would like to see them doing a Constantine movie with the same style. The Batman suffers from the fact it wants to start a cinematic universe while Joker was a contained story. If anything, I dislike the idea of it getting a sequel but let's see if it helps make more DC "Dark" movies.
Also, The Batman should've been rated R. The version of the Riddler they made belongs in a rated R movie, not PG13.
>film festival dictates worth
jesus...
It dictates more worth than some moron posting in Cinemaphile or Twitter, anon. And that's not saying much. But it's still more.
that's about as lame as saying the oscars matter
It obviously has to be a handicapable black trans person.
I would SERIOUSLY consider not going to watch it
Charlize Theron she can be sexy, crazy, and scary all at the same time.
Not a bad choice
Not in my timeline!!
It was rumored that Lady Gaga would be a part of the sequel
It’s Joker vs Joker and Joaquin will play both
Sounds kino
I'm really sick of DC forcing Harley into everything
Winona Ryder for me
I can see it now
holy frick. never thought about this one. she would be absolutely perfect. just dose her up with some tranquilizers and let her ad-lib that shit.
Would have been great for Tim Burton’s version.
Hunter obviously
It's probably not Harley. Foile a deux mostly happens between family members. So fi they go with the idea that Bruce is Arthur's brother, it must be about Batman and Joker's sick relationship.
Make Harley a projection of his mother, then. Cast the same actress that played her as young, but make her the "main character" so Joker is also implied to be an hallucination. And at the end you don't know which one is real or which one is telling the truth.
Not seeing where people are getting harley, must be the studio misdirection.
Because the first movie ended with him in Arkham and the title is folly of two. Makes sense
Came here to post her. She's the only choice
What has she ever done to deserve this role?
She's married to Phoenix also TGWTDT
Yes a joke is a folly
Joker part 2
I think this is more likely. I don’t think Phoenix would agree to a Harley story for a number of reasons.
Like…?
Yes, please no women in this aside from another Amber Lamps that gets harangued on a bus or whatever.
Wont it kind of defeat the point if this version of the Joker gets a Harley? Gonna be hard to believe the whole incel bit if he has a woman lusting over him 24/7 and him (for no reason) shunning her.
Works for a more gangster version of the character, but this pathetic version? I dont know.., then again I didnt like the first movie, so whatev’s lol
Shut the frick up zoomer. Don't you know serial killers have lots of fangirls? This is not a joke, it's real. Serial killers get millions of love letters by women every year. It's insane and no there's still no real explanation of why it happens.
Women are drawn to dominance, and controlling/killing another is about as dominate as you can get, at least for weak incels.
I’m sure theres a reddit page you can go back and read
Yup, it's survival-of-the-fittest biology. The foid brain is wired to be drawn to dominant males.
It's part of the reason why Reylos are a thing.
>I didn't like the first movie
Opinion discarded
He had a following by the end of the first movie. Why is it hard to fathom he’d get groupies when fricked up women are obsessed with serial killers and write to them?
>nobody has said roonroon
newbies gtfo
Do you like anal six?
only if you know how to gape
Hope they ended up going with Willem's idea and casted him as the copycat Joker
All you dumb chuds saying old white women who have hit the wall wheb it's clearly a role for Zendaya to own (as she does every role)
got the perfect harley quinn for ya
Plz no Quincels
Holy frick how do you do captchas now???!!!!
They will find a way to de-incel him. Remember how scared they were about someone getting close to expressing white man's modern disillusionment with the system?
Nah, /ourisraelite/ Todd Phillips is too based to do that.
israelite vs israelite
You just described every war for the past several centuries
Not really. They aren't actually fighting each other, they're pulling the strings and profiting from both.
lol
I believed Arthur was gay and him and Gary (Gaggy) were lovers make the Joker gay again Warner
Bitch, Batman is Joker’s soulmate.
Would love to see a more arkham origins take on the joker and bats relationship
Problem is, we don't have a capable Batman. Fairy boy Pattinson against Phoenix is a joke. At this point we need DiCaprio to put on the cape.
I know about someone
i could see it tbh
Lori Petty
sounds like he'll be forming a joker cult or influencing harley quinn
i'm going to spoil this movie long in advance, joker gets killed john lennon style
>Quinn
YOU FOOLS. He's coming. He said he wanted to and he's coming
That'd be based
The timing...
Society is collapsing
If this is true, shit is really about to hit the fricking fan (hard). I kept saying the US would collapse in the 2030s but it might be earlier.
grim quints of confirmation
Oh shit
Söylent Green was a documentary.
The people in Soilent Green probably lived better quality lives than we do now.
Uh oh.
UNHOLY PENT
you've doomed us all, you fool!
You never had the markings of a Jedi Master.
OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
They're already up $2 where I live. I noticed that before I noticed the gas prices.
TRUMP VICTORY LETS GO
test
Didn't Willem leak this movie a couple months ago or did they like his idea that much they made it happen?
DC hire this woman
SMILE BAD
ME WOMAN
ME NO SMILE
ME RESTING b***h FACE ALL TIME
ME THINK STRENGTH COME FROM BAD ATTITUDE
A psychopathic violent woman? The role Amber Heard was born to play
Couldn't care less. She's always been one of my least favorite batman villains. It worked as a one-off story but she's completely pointless beyond that. The very idea of a married Joker feels like something Joker himself would ridicule with a bad pun.
What Scorsese flick are they gonna rip off this time?
Night Shift probably
It's gonna be Margot Robbie, to connect the Joker 2019 cinematic universe to the DC cinematic universe
Nah, Margot will be in it but with no explanation as to how she's there or if the universes are connected. She'll probably even make a joke like "Hey Mistah J, you look different". WB is saying frick it.
>Joker 2 is released
>Riots and protests start again in USA
One is a coincidence. Two...
Because there's people with basic intelligence out there defending quality
Joker was good but 20 years late
Who will they cast as adult batman for joaquin's joker?
Some gap toothed bald Black
Why are so many morons thinking this is going to be about Harley Quinn?
The title is clearly referring to the dual identities of Arthur and Joker. Movie is probably going to delve deeper into the idea of the character trying to figure out his identity.
Everyone Arthur knew is dead except the midget. theres no way.
No, it means shared delusion, why name it that if it's about split personality? It's obviously another character. He was last locked up at Arkham. Harley is an obvious conclusion.
It would be funny if Phillips decided to show Phoenix's Joker inspiring Leto's Joker trying his movie to the wider DCEU. Imagine the collective butthurt.
Why does everyone think it’s referring to Harley? It’s most likely referring to Batman.
lol no unless they get a really young ben affleck
Time for this bawd to make her movie breakthrough?
That's a man
>The name's Quinn. Harley Quinn.
i loved her in northman
Delusional troony joker would be kino for a horror movie. Like a serious home on a serious earth
It's her turn
Garbage
Just like the first
Harley Quinn is honestly cringe, doesn't belong in this version of joker and is going to take away from him and his story.
todd phillips ripped off taxi driver and now he's going to rip off sid and nancy for this harley quinn movie
>The Joker 2019 warned the media about glorying shooters and the life of the lower class population.
>The Batman 2022 promotes shooters and how much white people are scumbags and need to do more for minorities
I am very sure this movie the protagonist will be Harley why dont make a Harley movie instead? oh right Birds of Prey flopped
it wasnt a harley quinn movie, it was a female team movie with annoying ass characters.
Batman remains to be Batman because shit is fricked and the law can't do better. That's it. Nolan was cool for what it was and Reeves is a fricking hack, and that's that. Frick The Batman. The movie sucked. Everyone that likes that piece of shit is a huge homosexual. The end.
You basically just agreed with The Batman's worldview.
It's clear that black mayor won't work out. Even Batman and Catwoman both say that they know it'll get worse.
You're siding with the thing you hate.
No, because The Batman was a terribly written movie with awful characters and in it the director shat all over Batman and his family to push some gay ass woke message about white privilege, male toxicity, and the harmful consequences of violence. Frick that movie and frick you.
Ooooh, someone's mad because they knew they couldn't refute my point...
You said that Batman continues to be Batman, and liking Nolan's more refutes that...
Someone argued themselves into a corner...
>You said that Batman continues to be Batman, and liking Nolan's more refutes that...
Batman should remain to be Batman because that's just what Batman is.
I fricking hated whatever notions that shitty movie tried to bring up with Batman being some out of touch count that is mean to random dead hookers, or Batman needing to donate more money to dem programs as if that should be a novel idea, or Batman just going after petty criminals because he is too fricking moronic to do anything meaningful, or Batman having invincible armors, or Batman stomping around like a moron, or Batman inspiring the Riddler and his army of incels from not-Cinemaphile, or the Waynes being crooked but not really because the director is a pussy that can't commit to his own shitty ideas and plot twists, or Batman feeling bad about wanting vengeance, or Batman giving a gay ass speech about unironic emotional scars like a moronic 14 years old (fricking LMAO), or any of that gay ass shit.
A Batman movie should just say that Batman exist because Gotham is that fricking broken and Bruce Wayne had the means and the desire to step up. That is it. No more reason needed. It's the same with something like Death Wish. Shit was fricked and someone decided to step up. Frick everything else.
That's black and white morality, and it does not exist. "Stepping up" has consequences, and whether you like it or not, TDK and The Batman both give answers to that, and only one is truly what Batman is about.
Sadly for you, it's The Batman.
And no amount of silly complaining or anger can change that.
the way you write this proves you go by the name of either Sanjay or Rasheesh
This homie gets it.
Damn you all misunderstand Batman on a fundamental level
True.
shamelessly samegayging with two consecutive posts lauding a clearly angry individual's pov
Based and truthpilled
>this dumbass doesn't think violence has consequences
Based. Gotham would be fricked if it wasn't for the weird ass cosplay white dude who swoops in and does all their dirty work. When supervillains exist, dark twisted vigilante violence is the only answer. The public fears the villain? Batman gives them something to fear. At least in the Nolan universe.
2022........ i'm forgotten.
Imagine being a grown man and arguing about batman online. kys please.
I utterly hate Harley Quinn(and sidekicks in general) Hope go god she doesn’t appear in this
The Batman can't even mog Batman Begins. Even did the '''flooding'''' better.
This scene mogs the shit outta The Batman. The people showed their humanity without a homosexual defending minorities from incels with guns like it was jan 6th.
>relies on people we've never met before to pull the third act from their asses
it's actually "Madness of two" - meant to describe when two people are insane together, for example a couple literally believe a child is theirs, even though they just stole it from a train station. Something like that.