peach = wildstyle, even sounds like her
crisprat = crisprat
bowser = lord business
green charlie day = charlie day in a space suit
Why Can't People SEE THAT ???
lel,this is just the lego movie with Mario characters.
peach = wildstyle, even sounds like her
crisprat = crisprat
bowser = lord business
green charlie day = charlie day in a space suit
Why Can't People SEE THAT ???
LEGO Movie was good, so it's fine.
>Chris Pratt and Charlie Day were in the Lego Movie as Emmet and Benny
>Now they're in the Mario Movie as Mario and Luigi
>Universal bought the Lego license from WB
>Universal is also making the Mario Movie
>The showrunner of Unikitty!, the Lego Movie spin-off cartoon, is head of story
There's a lot of strange parallels going on here between the Lego Movie and the Mario Movie. Could mean nothing, but it's interesting to think about.
Spiderverse is fundamentally just a lesser Lego movie. This shares some cast and crew, but if the story isn’t also a “meta” commentary about the franchise itself than it isn’t another Lego movie
Mario isn't too
And Illumination's Zelda is going to be How to Train Your Dragon.
Apparently that's the reason why they're doing a live-action reboot of the Dragon movies, they don't know how to distinguish the two franchises when they start bringing Hyrule to the Universal parks, so Epic Universe's Berk might lean on a slightly more realistic art style.
>Illumination's Zelda
please no
Can't wait for horse-faced Zelda.
Why not make Zelda more realistic instead? It has a history of doing more realistic artstyles?
No it doesn't. Zelda is only slightly less anime than Fire Emblem.
Why can't women be vulnerable sometimes and inspire others to perform acts of greatness? I have nothing against strong action girls, but why does EVERY female character in modern movies need to be that character?
Mario: Purga the impurities
>Why can't women be vulnerable sometimes
sometimes? you mean like in every movie pre-2010?
So switching from one extreme to another is a good thing? Not just a different flavour of the same moronation
Not really, there was a pretty wide range of characters before 2010, including a lot of lovable action-oriented girls. Wonder Woman, Toph, Elastigirl, Starfire Raven, The Powerpuff Girls. But even they were allowed to be traditionally feminine and even vulnerable at times, since that's part of being human.
Women who are more traditionally feminine and vulnerable than even the average women aren't doing any harm, especially if they're portrayed as people who are still positive and beneficial. Not everyone is strong in the same way.
Even if that's true, I'm more concerned that Peach's personality has completely changed. It's the same issue with Bo Peep, from Toy Story 1/2 to Toy Story 4, and given the trends, it's more likely ideological than it is for a purely artistic narrative purpose.
Because men need to be demoralized
You are fricking pussy little b***h if seeing strong cartoon women is enough to "demoralize" you
Bath faith response
Okay, then don't complain if a woman isn't portrayed as a Hollywood strong girl.
Who am I kidding, you're gonna do that anyway.
Bowser kidnaps her at the end
MARIOBROS
ITS MARIOVER
I would KILL to have books like these as a kid.
but the kids of today, they watch youtube kids and finger family shite. they arent allowed to have this mario kino
They aren't really hiding it with that title
>Zelda movie
>The absolute shilling of:
>Ya know, it called the legend of Zelda, buh Zelda not main character!
>THIS Zelda is her own woman!
>THIS Zelda is the one you've been waiting for!
>THIS Zelda is the Zelda I wanted for years!
>THIS Zelda isn't just gonna sit around and be captured!
>THIS Zelda isn't just smart she does flips and karate!
>THIS Zelda gonna show Link how it's done!
>This Zelda isn't just wisdom, she got courage and power!
the last game's story did it pretty well i thought, since she has always been a character bound by prophecy. Her story was essentially one of trying to understand her own role in the prophecy/world through study and resenting Link at first, eventually admiring him but keeping him at a distance until shit hit the fan and she realized for all her understanding she was powerless against the great evil so she had to put her hope in someone else. Its not like shes a powerless character and she basically existed as sort of 'in stasis' as opposed to being captured or being some badass attacking character.
If you kept that element of her character then that would be fine. Shes strong in magical ability and learning but she is sidelined in the royal family and politically/militarily has nothing and she has to learn to rely on and trust people who have the power to change the world, finally being rescued but having provided the setup and knowledge necessary for the hero to make it that far
But Zelda, unlike Peach, actually does shit and fighting ever since OoT
That hasn't stopped people from pulling the Demsel-card, because these people don't actually know the characters they want to frick up.
>did not play Mario 2
Mario 2 is a dream
Mario 3d world
Mario RPG
Super Paper Mario
All those spinoffs
i could tell since the first trailer, lost the little interest i had in the movie
I heard this is probably why Mitamoto approved of the casting. He liked the Lego Movie.
If it's anywhere as good as the Lego Movie it will be kino. So I honestly hope so.
Cool! The Lego Movie is great
considering this movie will most likely end up being trash can we all agree that this is the best video game movie made its fateful to the games and references it without being obnoxious about it and uwe boll was such a perfect shit director for a movie about postal
So long gay bowser
>Why Can't People SEE THAT ???
Because it's not true?
Frick off back to Cinemaphile.
>B-but muh adaptat-ACK!
Mario is a video game. have a nice day and stop spamming the board with off-topic bullshit.