You moron, normalization is when the audience is no longer adverse to the concept
2 years ago
Anonymous
Audiences are not adverse to homosexuals, more like apathetic to them.
Most people just go "whatever, do the hell you want with your sex life, just don't pester me about it".
What people hate is being preached at.Religious preaching is more persuasive since it appeals to a 'higher' level of need, but most people hate being lectured at on social matters and such, they just want easygoing entertainment to escape their problems. Not to be burdened with someone else's problems, imaginary or real.
Then why post it on Twitter? Oh that's right, because it's made to get brownie points and to virtue signal. They're late to the party yet still think anyone cares.
Reminds me of that joke in the Eltingville Club where they look at the cover of a bad girl comic: >Whoa! Look at the breasts on that girl! They're covered in blood!
Mediocre streaming shows get emojis now? Cinemaphile isn't gonna like this.
Because the art style is bad and the Harley Quinn show runners wouldn't know what romance is if it fricked their virginity out of them.
Only seen one clip of this show accidently on Youtube thinking it was from that recent Justice League series that got cancelled. The clip was Superman calling Wonder Woman a racist for assuming Superman knows all aliens or some shit like that. It wasn't very funny. Is the rest of the show like that?
>It wasn't very funny. Is the rest of the show like that?
Yes.
both harley and ivy are entirely new characters who have little to do with the originals or their relationship (which was basically assumed by everyone to be sexual)
the show is just not very good
Me too. I don´t know... I hope it´s good and manages to make me feel something that isn´t arousal at Harley and Ivy, but so far I see nothing that I can call fun.
I can't even imagine anything more fake or NPC than "how does something that effects society effect me, a consoomer bug man only interested in the present and what entitlements I can extract from
it at any given moment ?"
>The real homosexual couples that need to be on tv is gays
I agree >Specifically traps and femboys.
Take your prototroony shit and shove it up your ass.
The whole point of traps is they can go back to being a man at any point, unlike trannies who ruin their body. Traps have nothing to do with trannies, tourist.
nah man, for real, can confirm. bi-girls are still kinda chill. lesbo b***hes are sour, jealous, pissed off c**ts who just trow their weight around when anybody lets then. its like bi-girls are bees, and lesbians are hornets. found that out when i had friends over for a movie. i was just happy to have some friends over, and the fricking b***h was actually mad that my apartment was owned by me and not a girl
But they don't want to be normal people, they want to be special people, if they wanted to be normal they wouldn't identify as their sexual orientation, that's not what normal people do.
No, they aren't normal people, they're just like looking at a bowl of maggots. I had no problem with LGBT over ten years ago and never had a negative thought about them in my mind, but now that they're shilled 24/7, I think Islam has it right about you people.
Rook surprising long time for the trolls to crawl our of their shit pits.
Except they're still a fetish, thats why you still see them in movies and tv shows and not male to male kisses.
Male to male kisses occur more and more today so you’re wrong.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Gay men and women are the same thing, they're disgusting and should not exist.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Male to male kisses occur more and more today so you’re wrong.
Name one successful Disney or Netflix product where this happened.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Heartstopper, Riverdale, Eternals….
2 years ago
Anonymous
He said successful
2 years ago
Anonymous
Riverdale has like seven seasons. Heartstopper has like 98% approval rating. Eternals did fairly well considering omicron.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>approval rating
Once again, he said SUCCESSFUL you idiot
No, they aren't normal people, they're just like looking at a bowl of maggots. I had no problem with LGBT over ten years ago and never had a negative thought about them in my mind, but now that they're shilled 24/7, I think Islam has it right about you people.
This, as an adult it's really obvious that the rainbow cult are demons trying to get access to peoples children and then acting against them physically is ethically justified. The only reason they have so much power is because we thought we were being good people by tolerating them and now we we see them using every ounce of institutional power they get their hands on to groom children
Sorry anon, Gabby Rivera's Latina card has been revoked, in fact, I'm pretty sure that dyke calls herself "Latinx," which means you whites can have her.
Says the conservative unironically despite a considerable portion of the base believing in Qanon and election fraud lies told by a former reality TV host.
I still can't comprehend Kiteman of all people getting his own show.
Can't he just share screen time on this one?
Sure sure, he's a fun character.
But how many episodes before the writers run out of steam? 6? 12? I don't see it going past one season. Maybe thats fine. Not everything needs to go for a decade.
Only seen one clip of this show accidently on Youtube thinking it was from that recent Justice League series that got cancelled. The clip was Superman calling Wonder Woman a racist for assuming Superman knows all aliens or some shit like that. It wasn't very funny. Is the rest of the show like that?
SO HECKIN' BASED BROOOOOO
even for a gay like me this is just tiresome. that and I'm tired of seeing Harley-fricking-Quinne all over the god damn place lately. SHE SUCKS!! Shes obnoxious and boring. I'll take her red and black harlequin rendition over this shit any day.
Will never understand gay hate. I'm not a woke sjw or whatever but there's so much unwarranted anger directed at gays and they're literally the most harmless people on the planet. Is it a religious thing?
That and plus plenty of people who are in denial/closet/insecure about their sexuality and need to show off how straight they are by doubling down how much they hate gays.
Gay people are awesome. I wish more people would choose to frick members of the sex. Not because I have a fetish or anything, I just really want population numbers to dramatically decline.
There's a distinct "Woe is me" narrative attached to the community while simultaneously being an alternative that meant to be against the norm hence why they can get away with so much degenerate shit in the guise of MUH PRIDE but this doesn't work anymore once you yourself become the norm and the thing about this community is you give them an inch they're take a mile and not expect any criticism or else you're a bigot and deserve to have your life ruined for having different views. Also ironic that an organization that pushes a narrative of acceptance they don't actually care about anyone but their own kind.
tldr; The allure of the culture became entirely lost once they gained more power and became the establishment.
There is an inherently normal, instinctual reaction the vast majority of the human race has towards seeing the same sex being romantic towards one another. We know on a basal level that these behaviors are supposed to be for making children fundamentally first and foremost (even if that's not the conscious intention, love after all is largely instinctual and often irrational) and showing these towards something that can't have children made with is unsettling at the least (the same way someone making out with a tree would be). There are brain studies that show similar patterns in men viewing other men kiss as those same individuals viewing fecal matter or something else disgusting.
Now that on its own isn't the issue, the argument "well it's not my business" "privacy of their own bedroom" etc, is what most people think on some level as well. HOWEVER, there has been a push in various ways to """normalize""" it and make it seem like something that we SHOULDN'T have our instinctual reactions to. This, coupled with societal tension caused by increased resource scarcity and internal conflict has made this group a scapegoat/magnet for vitriol. They view these individuals as the manifestation of this public shame towards basal instincts and feeling of repression and demand of ingenuine behavior and thought policing that comes with something like the LGBT movement.
But LGBT isn't the same thing as gay and I've seen in my own life as well as on the internet and other personal media that more and more gays distance themselves from this and voice varying degrees of disapproval and disgust at it. Gays have their place, but they're always going to be the exception to the rule. They have existed to varying degrees in society for some time and they should be allowed to do their thing with each. But LGBT is unnatural and an unwarranted political tool that rightfully should be hated and should be separated from gays for their own good.
I've always wondered about that "homosexuals kissing look like maggots" thing because I dont feel that at all. I am bi, so it might just be because of that, but the worse I've ever thought is that two dudes kissing is funny. Like why does it activate peoples almonds to see them kiss?
>I don't like seeing them kissing women either.
That's more a side-effect of you being white, and thus low test.
So you get insecure when you see a man kiss a woman since you know he's probably superior to you, which makes you angry.
Very typical among autists and otaku types.
>Anon tell you the feelings he has >No, you're feeling THIS
Holy projection, Batman!
2 years ago
Anonymous
>projection
That word doesn't mean what you think it means anon.
Normal men do not get upset when they see a man kiss a woman.
Your father does not get angry when he's watching a film or a television show and sees a man kissing a woman.
He does not consider a man and a woman kissing on par with seeing maggots.
>spread disease >indoctrinate children > make media absolutely unwatchable for anyone but themselves
Fun fact, people are less religious than ever before yet normal people still hate you gays. Guess some things just won't change
This, as an adult it's really obvious that the rainbow cult are demons trying to get access to peoples children and then acting against them physically is ethically justified. The only reason they have so much power is because we thought we were being good people by tolerating them and now we we see them using every ounce of institutional power they get their hands on to groom children
You all don’t actually care about kids or groomers at all. It’s all just an excuse to spread evangelical Christian moral panic. You seethe over the thought of drag storytimes or whatever yet never say anything about child marriage laws or creepy child beauty pageants. Get fricked
I sure did 🙂 Do you think grooming is literally just kids getting married when they’re kids? It’s also the act of “grooming” someone from a young and impressionable age to trust and rely on you so that you can enter into a relationship with them the second they become adults. You c**ts just parrot buzzwords with no critical thought whatsoever.
>He groomed that 20 year old!
White people are such a meme.
2 years ago
Anonymous
He met her through 4H, established a mentor relationship with her when she was a child. Now they’re married. You all shriek about teachers saying lgbt stuff is normal yet think an old frick hooking up with the young girl he’s mentored and bankrolled for over a decade is normal lmao
Very telling!
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sorry dude, but this only works on white dudes.
No one else cares about some old dude interacting with a high schooler and then marrying her 4 years later when she's a legal adult.
Here's hoping he can still get it up, otherwise their sex life will be boring as frick.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>No one else cares about some old dude grooming a minor because it couldn't be used against a marginalized minority group
fixed
2 years ago
Anonymous
>An old dude talking to some high schooler at a professional event = grooming
White people, smdh. >Marginalized
Sorry m8, white homosexuals aren't marginalized.
Your white privilege overrides that, now kneel.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Here's hoping he can still get it up, otherwise their sex life will be boring as frick.
Seems like they have 2-3 kids already.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Damn, surprising for a dude who looked like he was almost 50 in 2011.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They have a 23 years age difference... meaning he was around 45 years old
2 years ago
Anonymous
What if he was a woman? Like not a MTF troony but straight up a successful lesbian who treated this girl the exact same. Would you still consider it based?
2 years ago
Anonymous
If she was a hot sexy MILF lesbian and they got married naked yea that'd be pretty based.
They're not inherently sexual. This only further exemplifies the difference between those movies and depictions, versus the inherently sexual and destabilizing performances of drag queens. Did you not think this through? Are you deliberately trying to torpedo your own argument?
>Will never understand gay hate
It's just tribalism. Homophobes just hate them because they're not like them.
>Cannot distinguish between pro pedophilia Queers and normal homosexuals
The only bigot here is you
2 years ago
Anonymous
How are they not sexual? They clearly normalizes men dressing up as women and acting like women. How is there a difference between a movie doing it and a drag queen reading a story in a library?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Those examples you gave don't normalize drag. In fact the whole punch line of the joke is that it is not normal for Robin Williams to dress up in a wig and a dress and lipstick like a woman. Please also note that when Robin Williams for the others dress up as women, even stereotypical women, they are still not dressing up as drag queens. I don't think the drag queens would get the push back they do from the right, nor the support they do from the queer theorists, if it was simply and otherwise normal man wearing a sundress or lipstick. But let's see what the proponents of drag queen story hour have to say from their own point of view:
>Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood
From the abstract:
"Ultimately, the authors propose that “drag pedagogy” provides a performative approach to queer pedagogy that is not simply about LGBT lives, but *living queerly*" (emphasis in original)
From the first paragraph:
"In this article, we explore the pedagogical contributions of a programme called Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) as a form of queer imagining in an early childhood context. Through this programme, drag artists have channelled their penchant for playfully “‘reading’ each other to filth” into different forms of literacy..."
Gee I wonder why there is now a dearth of published academic papers using queer Theory (which advocates for pedophilia) to support not transsexuals reading to children, but specifically drag queens to read the children
2 years ago
Anonymous
They absolutely normalize the concept of men dressing up and impersonating women. Just because it’s for comedic effect doesn’t change anything, especially when they’re positive roles and movies like Tootsie and Some Like it Hot have the characters actually enjoy being women.
And teaching kids about people being different and it being fun instead of scary or wrong is exactly the type,of accepting and open minded lessons they should be taught. And the kids love it because drag is about being outrageous and having fun.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are a groomer. You cannot come up with a good argument, so you enter the "thick as a brick, deliberately pretending not to get it" stage of the argument.
When you understand that Hitler thought all israelites were communists, the famous passage of "on debating the israelites " suddenly makes a lot of sense. Big think
How come all of the people leading the charge against wokeness are all post liberals, and conservative followers are all johny come lately on these issues?
Right-Wingers were always against it but used to (correctly) identify it as a symptom of the greater problem of leftism as a whole, rather than a unique problem only concerning certain lefties.
This video is one of what I think totals over 20 hours of material -- simply reading academic primary sources -- of queer Theory and how it's being made praxis in public education
>we'd complain about those to
No, you wouldn't, you fricking hypocrite. You have an agenda against anyone who's LGBTQ+ and just use any excuse to shit on them.
3/4 of my friends are gay. I just can't get away from the gays somehow. And they all hate the Queer stuff. One of them is Even a gay militant atheist furry. And his hatred of lgbtqiaa2smap+ suprasses my own by several orders of magnitude
>We made these hot girls kiss >Were so brave, praise us for reducing them to how they make our peepees feel
Shit, I guess all those lesbian porn directors were just brave and courageous progressives.
It's one of all the inconsistencies in modern feminism. Having a woman be fricked by strangers on camera is progressive, having her look sexy in media outside of porn is oppression.
>Were so brave, praise us for reducing them to how they make our peepees feel
Thats how all sexuality "pride" shit is. Its literally only about what gets their metaphorical dick hard.
This show is Venture Brothers but without any affection for the source material. So instead it just comes across as outsiders thinking comics are stupid and "here's how it would REALLY be." James Gunn trots the same tired shit out.
I was just going to post that this show is "off-brand Venture Bros." but you make a more cogent point about it being cynical and soulless in comparison to the better show.
Partially true.
Only white people like lesbian RELATIONSHIPS being shown in media, since, like you said, they don't have the testosterone to enjoy hetero relationships.
This also applies to a subset of embarrassing Asian otaku.
Any "man" who watches a show for lesbian shipping and so he can self-insert as a girl is not a real man, he's just a homosexual.
Harley and Ivy's relationship will either stay perfect turning into a complete bore, or feature conflict enraging screeching LGBTs who think all same sex relationships should be portrayed as flawless.
That's the trick, once they got to make them a couple they have to pull one way or another.
Because a book on how to promote the normalization if homosexuals in media said to use lesbians first since they're non threatening and have an arousal factor for straight men and no I'm not meming this is from an actual book
Because the people pushing for this are Auths that see racism and sexism everywhere in life and feel entitled to rewrite the language centers in all people's brains, and if they gain power even the way you sit on a chair will be regulated.
Uhh, no?
I've seen anime with blonde e-girls getting eaten out on-screen by older women.
There are tons of ecchi anime that deliver on hot girl-on-girl action, they're just not aimed at yurigays since modern yurigays aren't into girl-on-girl if there's a male anywhere in the cast.
I'm fine with Harley x Ivy being more than the subtext it used to be, but flaunting it like is pretty shit too. Focusing on their lesbian sexuality SO much seems to degrade them as characters.
I feel nothing when I see this.
Good, that was the goal.
They were trying to make boring trash?
He's referring to the normalization of homosexuals in media
>normalization of homosexuals
>producers throw a party every time they show it
You moron, normalization is when the audience is no longer adverse to the concept
Audiences are not adverse to homosexuals, more like apathetic to them.
Most people just go "whatever, do the hell you want with your sex life, just don't pester me about it".
What people hate is being preached at.Religious preaching is more persuasive since it appeals to a 'higher' level of need, but most people hate being lectured at on social matters and such, they just want easygoing entertainment to escape their problems. Not to be burdened with someone else's problems, imaginary or real.
Literally a fairy tale
Then why post it on Twitter? Oh that's right, because it's made to get brownie points and to virtue signal. They're late to the party yet still think anyone cares.
Being covered in blood make it kinda hot
Reminds me of that joke in the Eltingville Club where they look at the cover of a bad girl comic:
>Whoa! Look at the breasts on that girl! They're covered in blood!
That’s because you are a homosexual guy
Same
If it was Harley and Ivy from BTAS it would be hot. Dyed hair Harley will always look so wrong to me.
Mediocre streaming shows get emojis now? Cinemaphile isn't gonna like this.
Because the art style is bad and the Harley Quinn show runners wouldn't know what romance is if it fricked their virginity out of them.
>It wasn't very funny. Is the rest of the show like that?
Yes.
>Cinemaphile isn't gonna like this.
/g/? the board that glorifies programmer long socks?
>the art style is bad
no shut up
GIRLS KISSING GIRLS
NOT KISSING YOU
>cute cartoon girls kissing
>in reality lesbians look like shit
Yeah, I don't want them kissing me
both harley and ivy are entirely new characters who have little to do with the originals or their relationship (which was basically assumed by everyone to be sexual)
the show is just not very good
Me too. I don´t know... I hope it´s good and manages to make me feel something that isn´t arousal at Harley and Ivy, but so far I see nothing that I can call fun.
You may want to get that checked out
i support the pairing but this particular pair is so damn wooden, theres just no spark, its as sensual as a driftwood at low tide.
Guy has always been the true protagonist of Cinemaphile, we are just side characters in his based game
Caring about nothing is one of the core tenets of Anonymous. Fakes like
who cannot even respond correctly to posts are just controlled opposition npcs and tourists.
I can't even imagine anything more fake or NPC than "how does something that effects society effect me, a consoomer bug man only interested in the present and what entitlements I can extract from
it at any given moment ?"
>lesbians
Still?
Boring dykes Will go to Hell.
Lesbians? Are those LESBIANS!?
GIRLS KISSING GIRLS!?!?!?
Not kissing you!
I didn't think it was possible, but white people found a way to ruin lesbians.
Mother of god...
based whites
Lesbians already suck, this is just icing on the cake. The real homosexual couples that need to be on tv is gays. Specifically traps and femboys.
Bugs has existed for 80 years
Shut the frick up, gay. There's a reason no one wants to see guys kissing.
>The real homosexual couples that need to be on tv is gays
I agree
>Specifically traps and femboys.
Take your prototroony shit and shove it up your ass.
The whole point of traps is they can go back to being a man at any point, unlike trannies who ruin their body. Traps have nothing to do with trannies, tourist.
Troon.
>t. coomer gaybag
How are lesbians ruined? Because they aren’t just fetishized for your masturbatory pleasure ?
Thats literally the only good thing about them. Once you take that away you're just left with bitter c**ts.
OK Coomer.
nah man, for real, can confirm. bi-girls are still kinda chill. lesbo b***hes are sour, jealous, pissed off c**ts who just trow their weight around when anybody lets then. its like bi-girls are bees, and lesbians are hornets. found that out when i had friends over for a movie. i was just happy to have some friends over, and the fricking b***h was actually mad that my apartment was owned by me and not a girl
Lesbians got meme'd to death. Hollywood shilled it too much since the 90s and now everyone is bored of it. The taboo is broken.
So in other words, lesbians stopped being a fetish for straight guys and now are just normal people. Oh no, how horrible!
But they don't want to be normal people, they want to be special people, if they wanted to be normal they wouldn't identify as their sexual orientation, that's not what normal people do.
Rook surprising long time for the trolls to crawl our of their shit pits.
Male to male kisses occur more and more today so you’re wrong.
Gay men and women are the same thing, they're disgusting and should not exist.
>Male to male kisses occur more and more today so you’re wrong.
Name one successful Disney or Netflix product where this happened.
Heartstopper, Riverdale, Eternals….
He said successful
Riverdale has like seven seasons. Heartstopper has like 98% approval rating. Eternals did fairly well considering omicron.
>approval rating
Once again, he said SUCCESSFUL you idiot
Except they're still a fetish, thats why you still see them in movies and tv shows and not male to male kisses.
No, they aren't normal people, they're just like looking at a bowl of maggots. I had no problem with LGBT over ten years ago and never had a negative thought about them in my mind, but now that they're shilled 24/7, I think Islam has it right about you people.
This, as an adult it's really obvious that the rainbow cult are demons trying to get access to peoples children and then acting against them physically is ethically justified. The only reason they have so much power is because we thought we were being good people by tolerating them and now we we see them using every ounce of institutional power they get their hands on to groom children
>The taboo is broken.
Good.
Yes.
Without the sexiness and nudity, lesbians are worthless.
White people took something sexy and made it unsexy.
people
Sorry anon, Gabby Rivera's Latina card has been revoked, in fact, I'm pretty sure that dyke calls herself "Latinx," which means you whites can have her.
Oh no! We don't want her!
Then I'm pawning her off on the blacks.
Hopefully they'll shoot her.
Then it's decided, Gabby Rivera is officially black.
Now we just need to draw up the official documents.
Sorry, but on behalf of the black community we’ve gotta decline. We’re passing her off to the natives, maybe they’ll do something with her.
Pride is also the devil´s favorite sin. Keep doing a good job, Gabby. We are all proud of you.
As a representative of whites, we must decline.
>~~*white*~~
Best part is they ruin it for themselves.
>New joker movie will feature Harley getting together with the joker
How will the c/u/cks ever cope?
>THEY BROKE NEW GROUND
What cultural zeitgeist event would force libtards' minds to progress past the late 80s?
>force libtards' minds to progress past the late 80s?
lead
Not possible, their entire world view is incompatible with reality.
Says the conservative unironically despite a considerable portion of the base believing in Qanon and election fraud lies told by a former reality TV host.
>spots dissent
>immediate baseless stawman erected
You aren't even trying. Reality is not a factor in any argument you will make.
If you want to paint one side irrational and entirely delusional then I can too, and come with actual receipts.
You mean how your base scrambles lockstep to defend a woman's right to kill the unborn, yet can not actually define what a woman is?
The left has a long tradition of defending a woman’s right to choose, yes. That’s entirely irrelevant to what was being discussed.
So whats a woman? We'll need that definition in order to apply your previous statement.
Leftists don't have a destination, only a direction. It's even in the name
It doesn't say that
When is the kiteman spin-off?
I still can't comprehend Kiteman of all people getting his own show.
Can't he just share screen time on this one?
Sure sure, he's a fun character.
But how many episodes before the writers run out of steam? 6? 12? I don't see it going past one season. Maybe thats fine. Not everything needs to go for a decade.
The show's more about the Gotham villains visiting Noonan's than an actual Kite Man show. He's just part of the framing device.
Damn, I don't want Kite Man to be just a vehicle for other characters, I would like them to fllesh out his character like they did with HQ
>Cartoon gays
>This is going to continue forever
I’m so tired of it all.
Good.
Cope
>Forever
Not if King Clarence has anything to say
>Do some research on Clarence Thomas
Holy shit this dude is based
How can one man be so based?
Me too anon, me fricking too. (︵,)
>No one cares about children
Projection/10. Probably trolling at this point
I guess so. Now that you call it projection I may have jumped the gun. I'll give it a think. Have a good day, anon.
Only seen one clip of this show accidently on Youtube thinking it was from that recent Justice League series that got cancelled. The clip was Superman calling Wonder Woman a racist for assuming Superman knows all aliens or some shit like that. It wasn't very funny. Is the rest of the show like that?
I was impressed that they gave the Joker a redemption arc that works without being a total betrayal of his character (emphasis on total).
>covered in blood
Which got the abortion?
They both get fricked by Batman and his BBC (Big Bat wiener)
Please tell me the lezbo shit is kept to a minimum. It ruined season 2.
I'm more annoyed at the pretentious female cussing all the time.
this show should have been more "what if Dan vs was a grill". Lesbians are just boring.
SO HECKIN' BASED BROOOOOO
even for a gay like me this is just tiresome. that and I'm tired of seeing Harley-fricking-Quinne all over the god damn place lately. SHE SUCKS!! Shes obnoxious and boring. I'll take her red and black harlequin rendition over this shit any day.
>Covered in blood from white males, lesbian kiss
kek, now even the normies are noticing the propaganda, please go on doing this.
What is that red thing?
Probabaly some monster exploded and its guts are falling around, one landing on harley's head?
Why do we care about deviant art fetish shit? Loomis.
Harley Quinn is the worst thing to happen to Poison Ivy
>LET'S FRICKING GOOOO
Back to twitter
Will there be more feet
Frick off shill
Why are lesbians the face of the LGBT community these days anyway, what happened to all the buff shirtless dudes wrestling.
I mean, except AIDS
Gay men have been largely emasculated, just like men as a whole.
I got no respect for this fake ass bullshit corporate rep until they get the balls to make a full tom of finland animated series
>tfw no Superbat kiss instead of this ivy harley shit
truly life is suffering
Lesbians are the most acceptable kind of LGBT to the masses because all women are bisexual so it's not seen as weird as gay guys or trannies.
Will never understand gay hate. I'm not a woke sjw or whatever but there's so much unwarranted anger directed at gays and they're literally the most harmless people on the planet. Is it a religious thing?
That and plus plenty of people who are in denial/closet/insecure about their sexuality and need to show off how straight they are by doubling down how much they hate gays.
Gay people are awesome. I wish more people would choose to frick members of the sex. Not because I have a fetish or anything, I just really want population numbers to dramatically decline.
There's a distinct "Woe is me" narrative attached to the community while simultaneously being an alternative that meant to be against the norm hence why they can get away with so much degenerate shit in the guise of MUH PRIDE but this doesn't work anymore once you yourself become the norm and the thing about this community is you give them an inch they're take a mile and not expect any criticism or else you're a bigot and deserve to have your life ruined for having different views. Also ironic that an organization that pushes a narrative of acceptance they don't actually care about anyone but their own kind.
tldr; The allure of the culture became entirely lost once they gained more power and became the establishment.
>Also ironic that an organization that pushes a narrative of acceptance they don't actually care about anyone but their own kind.
???????????????
Are you fricking serious?
The lack of self awareness is amazing
>IS THAT A HECKIN' CHRISTIANERNO?
You must mean muslims
Who said anything about christians? Or religion in general?
https://mobile.twitter.com/stillgray/status/1540770916401291264
These past few days have showcased how deranged these people are.
kek, kneepads and a pillow, how small of a pain threshold do these SJWs have ?
A link that goes nowhere? Well I’m convinced!
So you're moronic
So you're pretending to be moronic
Stop projecting troony
Have you seen how they treat other kinky people?
There is an inherently normal, instinctual reaction the vast majority of the human race has towards seeing the same sex being romantic towards one another. We know on a basal level that these behaviors are supposed to be for making children fundamentally first and foremost (even if that's not the conscious intention, love after all is largely instinctual and often irrational) and showing these towards something that can't have children made with is unsettling at the least (the same way someone making out with a tree would be). There are brain studies that show similar patterns in men viewing other men kiss as those same individuals viewing fecal matter or something else disgusting.
Now that on its own isn't the issue, the argument "well it's not my business" "privacy of their own bedroom" etc, is what most people think on some level as well. HOWEVER, there has been a push in various ways to """normalize""" it and make it seem like something that we SHOULDN'T have our instinctual reactions to. This, coupled with societal tension caused by increased resource scarcity and internal conflict has made this group a scapegoat/magnet for vitriol. They view these individuals as the manifestation of this public shame towards basal instincts and feeling of repression and demand of ingenuine behavior and thought policing that comes with something like the LGBT movement.
But LGBT isn't the same thing as gay and I've seen in my own life as well as on the internet and other personal media that more and more gays distance themselves from this and voice varying degrees of disapproval and disgust at it. Gays have their place, but they're always going to be the exception to the rule. They have existed to varying degrees in society for some time and they should be allowed to do their thing with each. But LGBT is unnatural and an unwarranted political tool that rightfully should be hated and should be separated from gays for their own good.
I've always wondered about that "homosexuals kissing look like maggots" thing because I dont feel that at all. I am bi, so it might just be because of that, but the worse I've ever thought is that two dudes kissing is funny. Like why does it activate peoples almonds to see them kiss?
>I am bi
>Why do I not have the same reaction as hetero men?
It's truly a mystery anon.
That didn't answer my question, anon
It's something you'll never be able to understand because, again, you are bi, and not hetero.
But why do YOU get upset anon? Why do you think its gross? Its not any different than kissing a girl
>Its not any different than kissing a girl
Anon, what part of "you are bisexual and thus cannot understand a hetero mindset," do you not understand?
Because men are gross.
I don't like seeing them kissing women either.
>I don't like seeing them kissing women either.
That's more a side-effect of you being white, and thus low test.
So you get insecure when you see a man kiss a woman since you know he's probably superior to you, which makes you angry.
Very typical among autists and otaku types.
>Anon tell you the feelings he has
>No, you're feeling THIS
Holy projection, Batman!
>projection
That word doesn't mean what you think it means anon.
Normal men do not get upset when they see a man kiss a woman.
Your father does not get angry when he's watching a film or a television show and sees a man kissing a woman.
He does not consider a man and a woman kissing on par with seeing maggots.
Because there's a mix of fear and arousal reaction from people whom are homophobic.
Hedonism is wrong, simple as.
>spread STDs groom kids and be genetic dead-ends at record rates
>harmless
>spread disease
>indoctrinate children
> make media absolutely unwatchable for anyone but themselves
Fun fact, people are less religious than ever before yet normal people still hate you gays. Guess some things just won't change
This is bait, right?
You all don’t actually care about kids or groomers at all. It’s all just an excuse to spread evangelical Christian moral panic. You seethe over the thought of drag storytimes or whatever yet never say anything about child marriage laws or creepy child beauty pageants. Get fricked
>married on Jan. 8 2011
>she graduated from Eagleville High School in 2007
Anon did you even read this image before posting it?
I sure did 🙂 Do you think grooming is literally just kids getting married when they’re kids? It’s also the act of “grooming” someone from a young and impressionable age to trust and rely on you so that you can enter into a relationship with them the second they become adults. You c**ts just parrot buzzwords with no critical thought whatsoever.
>He groomed that 20 year old!
White people are such a meme.
He met her through 4H, established a mentor relationship with her when she was a child. Now they’re married. You all shriek about teachers saying lgbt stuff is normal yet think an old frick hooking up with the young girl he’s mentored and bankrolled for over a decade is normal lmao
Very telling!
Sorry dude, but this only works on white dudes.
No one else cares about some old dude interacting with a high schooler and then marrying her 4 years later when she's a legal adult.
Here's hoping he can still get it up, otherwise their sex life will be boring as frick.
>No one else cares about some old dude grooming a minor because it couldn't be used against a marginalized minority group
fixed
>An old dude talking to some high schooler at a professional event = grooming
White people, smdh.
>Marginalized
Sorry m8, white homosexuals aren't marginalized.
Your white privilege overrides that, now kneel.
>Here's hoping he can still get it up, otherwise their sex life will be boring as frick.
Seems like they have 2-3 kids already.
Damn, surprising for a dude who looked like he was almost 50 in 2011.
They have a 23 years age difference... meaning he was around 45 years old
What if he was a woman? Like not a MTF troony but straight up a successful lesbian who treated this girl the exact same. Would you still consider it based?
If she was a hot sexy MILF lesbian and they got married naked yea that'd be pretty based.
we'd complain about those too, theres just no gangs of pedos on Cinemaphiles trying to defend them.
>we'd complain about those to
No, you wouldn't, you fricking hypocrite. You have an agenda against anyone who's LGBTQ+ and just use any excuse to shit on them.
I'm complaining now. Frick those people too.
Now you call out these degenerates
Lol, anon wont. He is actually one of them and believe in them deep down.
tf is a "gender neutral town"
Is that guy even much older than her? Some guys start balding really early.
Almost got me to reply
>Meanwhile the possibility of she marrying him for money are completely out of the table
Remember when marriages of convenience were a thing?
I really don't care about groomer this or that, I just find it fricking creepy and weird.
>drag storytimes
Inherently sexual and no kid should have access to those. Keep crying, dipshit.
Food for thought
Got permabanned from Reddit for "hate speach" for disagreeing with drag queens reading to elementary kids as a good thing (good riddance)
>Inherently sexual
Do you think movies like Tootsie, Some Like it Hot, White Chicks, Big Momma’s House, Mrs. Doubtfire are inherently sexual?
For youngsters with lonely pee-pees, EVERYTHING is inherently sexual.
They're not inherently sexual. This only further exemplifies the difference between those movies and depictions, versus the inherently sexual and destabilizing performances of drag queens. Did you not think this through? Are you deliberately trying to torpedo your own argument?
>Cannot distinguish between pro pedophilia Queers and normal homosexuals
The only bigot here is you
How are they not sexual? They clearly normalizes men dressing up as women and acting like women. How is there a difference between a movie doing it and a drag queen reading a story in a library?
Those examples you gave don't normalize drag. In fact the whole punch line of the joke is that it is not normal for Robin Williams to dress up in a wig and a dress and lipstick like a woman. Please also note that when Robin Williams for the others dress up as women, even stereotypical women, they are still not dressing up as drag queens. I don't think the drag queens would get the push back they do from the right, nor the support they do from the queer theorists, if it was simply and otherwise normal man wearing a sundress or lipstick. But let's see what the proponents of drag queen story hour have to say from their own point of view:
>Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood
From the abstract:
"Ultimately, the authors propose that “drag pedagogy” provides a performative approach to queer pedagogy that is not simply about LGBT lives, but *living queerly*" (emphasis in original)
From the first paragraph:
"In this article, we explore the pedagogical contributions of a programme called Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) as a form of queer imagining in an early childhood context. Through this programme, drag artists have channelled their penchant for playfully “‘reading’ each other to filth” into different forms of literacy..."
Gee I wonder why there is now a dearth of published academic papers using queer Theory (which advocates for pedophilia) to support not transsexuals reading to children, but specifically drag queens to read the children
They absolutely normalize the concept of men dressing up and impersonating women. Just because it’s for comedic effect doesn’t change anything, especially when they’re positive roles and movies like Tootsie and Some Like it Hot have the characters actually enjoy being women.
And teaching kids about people being different and it being fun instead of scary or wrong is exactly the type,of accepting and open minded lessons they should be taught. And the kids love it because drag is about being outrageous and having fun.
You are a groomer. You cannot come up with a good argument, so you enter the "thick as a brick, deliberately pretending not to get it" stage of the argument.
When you understand that Hitler thought all israelites were communists, the famous passage of "on debating the israelites " suddenly makes a lot of sense. Big think
How come all of the people leading the charge against wokeness are all post liberals, and conservative followers are all johny come lately on these issues?
Right-Wingers were always against it but used to (correctly) identify it as a symptom of the greater problem of leftism as a whole, rather than a unique problem only concerning certain lefties.
Lefties and liberals are not the same thing, but liberals have been sheeplike useful idiots for leftist causes for about 40 years now
How do I just know this guy is a israelite ?
Gays no queer theorists yes.
This video is one of what I think totals over 20 hours of material -- simply reading academic primary sources -- of queer Theory and how it's being made praxis in public education
3/4 of my friends are gay. I just can't get away from the gays somehow. And they all hate the Queer stuff. One of them is Even a gay militant atheist furry. And his hatred of lgbtqiaa2smap+ suprasses my own by several orders of magnitude
>Will never understand gay hate
It's just tribalism. Homophobes just hate them because they're not like them.
The gays are taking over!
At least based Kiteman dodges a bullet and is getting his own thing going
I think its funny how twitter has made a business of making these emoji for corporations
>We made these hot girls kiss
>Were so brave, praise us for reducing them to how they make our peepees feel
Shit, I guess all those lesbian porn directors were just brave and courageous progressives.
It's one of all the inconsistencies in modern feminism. Having a woman be fricked by strangers on camera is progressive, having her look sexy in media outside of porn is oppression.
Plenty of lesbian porn directors are women who make porn from a feminist perspective so it is progressive
>porn from a feminist perspective
Kek
>Were so brave, praise us for reducing them to how they make our peepees feel
Thats how all sexuality "pride" shit is. Its literally only about what gets their metaphorical dick hard.
Nah I like this. Just means Jokers sadistic abuse of Harley is more pleasing.
This show is Venture Brothers but without any affection for the source material. So instead it just comes across as outsiders thinking comics are stupid and "here's how it would REALLY be." James Gunn trots the same tired shit out.
I was just going to post that this show is "off-brand Venture Bros." but you make a more cogent point about it being cynical and soulless in comparison to the better show.
AY WHASDIS FAUCKIN' GAY SHIT GOIN' ON IN 'ERE?
show of hands, how many of you are sick an tired of lesbians in cartoons?
Me
Superior lesbian ship incoming
>canon /ll/
whoa
nah
so groundbreaking
The first two queens can kiss my ass, they nearly starved their people to death.
Why can't they just be friends?
Let them be lesbians just not with each other.
You mean like how they have been for most of their time they’ve been paired together?
Yes, why can't people appreciate friendship.
Has Ivy ever been coded as gay? Even within the context of her friendship with Harley. Her classic MO is seducing guys. Is she bisexual then?
Only white people like lesbians because they don't have the testosterone to enjoy heterosexual relationships.
Partially true.
Only white people like lesbian RELATIONSHIPS being shown in media, since, like you said, they don't have the testosterone to enjoy hetero relationships.
This also applies to a subset of embarrassing Asian otaku.
Any "man" who watches a show for lesbian shipping and so he can self-insert as a girl is not a real man, he's just a homosexual.
Harley and Ivy's relationship will either stay perfect turning into a complete bore, or feature conflict enraging screeching LGBTs who think all same sex relationships should be portrayed as flawless.
That's the trick, once they got to make them a couple they have to pull one way or another.
All I want is just more Clayface voiced by Alan Tudyk.
what time is the trailer coming.
Trailer is out. More based Clayface and King Shark shenanigans
This season seems hornier than the last two.
>Swamp Thing and Nora hook up
It's a step up from Maxie Zeus, at least.
Looks like we're getting a Suicide Squad episode. Also, a random James Gunn appearance, I guess.
>No Psycho
bummed
He'll probably be there. Kite Man's not in the trailer and we know he shows up.
Mrs Freeze is a prostitute
Should have said Lez fricking go.
why is it always dykes? why can't they make a show about two good looking dudes falling for each other?
Because a book on how to promote the normalization if homosexuals in media said to use lesbians first since they're non threatening and have an arousal factor for straight men and no I'm not meming this is from an actual book
Do you remember which one? I remember reading this. It was a pretty old book st this point like 60s or 70s I think
Say it is normalized. What does it cost you or me?
Before normalization: You aren't having sex.
After normalization: You aren't having sex.
And don't give me some vague "think about the children" shit. We are on Cinemaphile. No one cares about children in any legal way.
>arguing with holes
>accusation meant for social shaming
This is Cinemaphile, no one cares about your holes, harlot. Start arguing like a man.
>Projection
Because the people pushing for this are Auths that see racism and sexism everywhere in life and feel entitled to rewrite the language centers in all people's brains, and if they gain power even the way you sit on a chair will be regulated.
Your parents will always be disappointed in you but that doesn't mean that other kids should have to meet the same fate.
>in any legal way
Well way to ruin my punchline with that append
I know the feel.
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
Call me when they actually have a lesbian sex scene.
Fricking cowards.
Only anime gets to have lesbian sex scenes anon, sorry.
Too male gazey, innit?
But isnt anime notorious for only tessing girl on girl stuff but never ever following through?
Uhh, no?
I've seen anime with blonde e-girls getting eaten out on-screen by older women.
There are tons of ecchi anime that deliver on hot girl-on-girl action, they're just not aimed at yurigays since modern yurigays aren't into girl-on-girl if there's a male anywhere in the cast.
>I've seen anime with blonde e-girls getting eaten out on-screen by older women.
Pics or it didn't happen
I think he's talking about Seikon no qwaser
I don't think yurigays would be into it though
Not him, but he's probably referring to pic related, which is pretty hot.
That don't count
Cunnilingus doesn't count?
Maybe you should watch more than Marvel movies.
I have no interest in watching pretentious art movies, I just want cute cartoon girls
>OMG LOOK AT THE CARTOON GAYS!!
it's really getting tiresome Cinemaphile...
Yeah. Especially this one.
Harley and Ivy were a thing way back in the 1990s. Jesus, get a sense of history, you fricking zoomers.
I'm fine with Harley x Ivy being more than the subtext it used to be, but flaunting it like is pretty shit too. Focusing on their lesbian sexuality SO much seems to degrade them as characters.
Cute pic
man, why do some puerto ricans insist on being so fricking annoying
i know there's cool ones out there but some of the most prominent puerto ricans are just fricking tiring to see and hear from
Wait, wait, didn't this happen already?
too late
Nu-Harley is not real to me. She doesn't exist. If she isn't in a black and red leather jumpsuit she isn't Harley.