his job, his life role, the entire reason we know about him at all, is lickspittle. so while him doing that is not great, it's not something worth noting
>Jay reservedly states his opinion >Mike states his contrary opinion >Jay now recalibrates his position and states his new opinion which better conforms to Mike's
every single fricking episode
most recent example being their Thor Love and Thunder review. Jay had every right to hate that pile of shit but softened his stance once Mike said it was okay.
>Jay got offended by nudity again
So he’s just like Cinemaphile then, because this board is always sperging out over "unnecessary" sex scenes and nudity
There’s no such thing as necessary nudity in a film. The nude scene exists because of pervy writers and directors wanting to disrobe famous women in front of the world.
You sound like Ebert white knighting for Isabella Rosselini in his Blue Velvet review. Nudity is like anything else, its a part of the human experience and it shouldn't have to be justified as "necessary" any more than any other element or creative decision in the film.
There is nothing wrong with phone posting. I almost exclusively phonepost and I have received many (You)s leading credence to the quality of my engagement on this website.
Also you can phonepost from just about anywhere, and I typically phone post while lying on my bed or the couch, its easy and convenient and you don't get bogged down by having to deal with a laptop.
There is quite literally no reason phoneposting is bad besides contrived rhetorics cooked up by newbies in a blatant attempt at trying to fit in by aping what they believed the oldgays would've said, not knowing why.
Anon why... why would you like... do that it's obnoxious as frick just... type like a normal person and maybe... just maybe... not a cringe moron trying to get reddit gold.
Note that roasties and their orbiters are whining about how mean and 'abusive' the story is. They comment on nothing else. I hate this culture of care.
>reasonable review
He’s just literally regurgitating every criticism everyone made in every direction. He’s too terrified to have a real opinion anymore, every review is this indecisive bullshit now.
I also noticed that anons here criticised the acting, the ridiculous scenes (the blowjob one, the abortion one and many others), the lack of nudity the tryhard artistic choices (resolution changes). People may be just coomers or philistines but is that worse than this moralgay crusade? >oh no you're slandering American Queen
Love how everyone became a moralgay and a plotgay when it's not muh psychological horror kino. They like their microwaved dinner all right even if it's a different item on the menu than before.
This whole "offended by nudity" thing makes me laugh, clearly these people don't know about Jay's short film where a naked chick rubs goo all over her big breasts
It makes me laugh how you think him being a hypocrite changes the fact that he is always uncomfortable or scoffs at nudity in those b movies. Last BOTW, he made sure to change the subject to naked men immediately.
lol it will be funny seeing Jay trying to say this in a video, when they have always said they didn’t care about movies changing details. Most notably in the Ed Wood video.
Inventing details can still be respectful to the person the movie is about. Lincoln, for example. That movie had many conversations behind closed doors that there is zero historical record of. They had to use what material they had to make assumptions about what would have happened, how these people talked, what deals were made, etc.
Did Lincoln really very nearly decide to focus on ending the war over ending slavery? We have no idea. The movie invented that scene with the two telegraph operators. But scenes like that are, while made up, respectful of who Lincoln was and serve to build a better narrative about his life.
What is gained by inventing Marilyn getting raped by JFK or any of the other shit? What narrative is served by that?
The made up details in Lincoln were neither favorable nor unfavorable, they just served to fill in the gaps of history’s knowledge. That’s what invented details should be used for: to fill in the gaps. Not to make someone look good or bad.
Also guess my political stances moron you’d be wrong
The movie invented details because it's based on a book that also invented details - Blonde was a fictional book, not a biography. You want to get mad about extremely kino JFK rape name Joyce Carol Oats, not the movie.
literally, what is this homosexuals problem with sex? does he even have a gf? everything he says and does is like he hates being a man. >no no not pussy anything but that
Are we ignoring the fact that marylin monroe is portrayed as some dumb blonde who can't do shit?
Like isn't that kinda sexist bro, doesn't matter if the film is fricking amazing?
>i have read social media and found the middle ground because I’m a pussy
lol EVERY TIME
his job, his life role, the entire reason we know about him at all, is lickspittle. so while him doing that is not great, it's not something worth noting
Idk I think it’s funny how he literally always says the same dumb nothing shit.
>I HAVE NO OPINION ONE WAY OR THE OTHER
>Jay reservedly states his opinion
>Mike states his contrary opinion
>Jay now recalibrates his position and states his new opinion which better conforms to Mike's
every single fricking episode
it's cruel of mike to ever ask jay to talk first
most recent example being their Thor Love and Thunder review. Jay had every right to hate that pile of shit but softened his stance once Mike said it was okay.
>Jay got offended by nudity again
So he’s just like Cinemaphile then, because this board is always sperging out over "unnecessary" sex scenes and nudity
name once, newbie
There’s no such thing as necessary nudity in a film. The nude scene exists because of pervy writers and directors wanting to disrobe famous women in front of the world.
What about award winning films like Titane?
You sound like Ebert white knighting for Isabella Rosselini in his Blue Velvet review. Nudity is like anything else, its a part of the human experience and it shouldn't have to be justified as "necessary" any more than any other element or creative decision in the film.
Perv
Well he didn't hate it.
Why do obnoxious millennials/gen x manbabies always tend to type like...this? It's kind of...amazing?
they grew up thinking sarcasm was a personality trait and that sounding faux-confused was the soul of wit. it was ducking aggravating to deal with.
Thanks to phonegays like yourself Cinemaphile is in Eternal Summer. Touché.
t.balding xilennial that answers questions with a b***hy question mark
There is nothing wrong with phone posting. I almost exclusively phonepost and I have received many (You)s leading credence to the quality of my engagement on this website.
Also you can phonepost from just about anywhere, and I typically phone post while lying on my bed or the couch, its easy and convenient and you don't get bogged down by having to deal with a laptop.
There is quite literally no reason phoneposting is bad besides contrived rhetorics cooked up by newbies in a blatant attempt at trying to fit in by aping what they believed the oldgays would've said, not knowing why.
Biggers tongue my anus
kys phonegay...he posted from his phone.
have a listen to him speaking
zoomers obviously never pause to think
Do you not know how to translate spoken indications into text?
Anon why... why would you like... do that it's obnoxious as frick just... type like a normal person and maybe... just maybe... not a cringe moron trying to get reddit gold.
Oh, Boy. It's unbearable. I should murder Jay Bauman just to make a point
Look at his reply to your post. He obviously has never read a single book and doesn't know when nor at which frequency to use an ellipsis.
He’s still waiting to be told what to think by twitter leftoids
...talking like this has been common since the early days of internet forums. How old are you?
Note that roasties and their orbiters are whining about how mean and 'abusive' the story is. They comment on nothing else. I hate this culture of care.
>"care"
ftfy
>twitter post
Delete yourself.
>NOOOO YOU CAN'T DEPICT KENNEDY AS AN INSANE RAPIST AMD MARILYN MONROE AS A bawd
why not? it's accurate
are u an eyewitness
oh but stating that jeffrey dahmer being gay is problematic?
What a nothing tweet that's somehow one-note but also awful thanks Jay
Is it really well made? That blowjob scene was embarrassingly bad
Is the one note the brown note, though?
He types like how he talks. Funny.
That's actually a pretty reasonable review. Keep in mind he likes trash horror films so his tolerance is likely much higher.
All the shit in the film is from the novel too, they just ramp it up much more.
>reasonable review
He’s just literally regurgitating every criticism everyone made in every direction. He’s too terrified to have a real opinion anymore, every review is this indecisive bullshit now.
I also noticed that anons here criticised the acting, the ridiculous scenes (the blowjob one, the abortion one and many others), the lack of nudity the tryhard artistic choices (resolution changes). People may be just coomers or philistines but is that worse than this moralgay crusade?
>oh no you're slandering American Queen
Love how everyone became a moralgay and a plotgay when it's not muh psychological horror kino. They like their microwaved dinner all right even if it's a different item on the menu than before.
How is it hateful?
id like to know as well
This whole "offended by nudity" thing makes me laugh, clearly these people don't know about Jay's short film where a naked chick rubs goo all over her big breasts
It makes me laugh how you think him being a hypocrite changes the fact that he is always uncomfortable or scoffs at nudity in those b movies. Last BOTW, he made sure to change the subject to naked men immediately.
It was art when he did it.
It's not just about the nudity though, right?
He’s being ironic here
Like how anons here ironically like girls with dicks?
r u 1
jay who
It's funny. Norma Mortenson wasn't even all that hot. She was just caked in makeup. The definition of a completely fake person, personality, and look.
I can't believe 40 year old """men""" talk like this and care about this
Jay is a closet homosexual be patient with him
Rock Hudson was one too. There's no excusing closet homosexuals who are homosexuals.
i'm not going to help you frick him op
TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!! TWITTER THREAD!!
HEY GUYS DID YOU HEAR WHAT SOCIAL MEDIA TALKED ABOUT TODA- ACK!
He's offended by female nudity. If there were nude men he'd absolutely love it.
Nudity is clearly not what he was talking about. The movie invents details about her life in order to show her being abused for three hours.
lol it will be funny seeing Jay trying to say this in a video, when they have always said they didn’t care about movies changing details. Most notably in the Ed Wood video.
Inventing details can still be respectful to the person the movie is about. Lincoln, for example. That movie had many conversations behind closed doors that there is zero historical record of. They had to use what material they had to make assumptions about what would have happened, how these people talked, what deals were made, etc.
Did Lincoln really very nearly decide to focus on ending the war over ending slavery? We have no idea. The movie invented that scene with the two telegraph operators. But scenes like that are, while made up, respectful of who Lincoln was and serve to build a better narrative about his life.
What is gained by inventing Marilyn getting raped by JFK or any of the other shit? What narrative is served by that?
Yeah lol like this, it would be funny seeing them do mental gymnastics to explain their inconsistencies
>making up favourable yet fake details… GOOD
>making up unfavourable yet likely true details… BAD
I bet I know every one of your political stances
The made up details in Lincoln were neither favorable nor unfavorable, they just served to fill in the gaps of history’s knowledge. That’s what invented details should be used for: to fill in the gaps. Not to make someone look good or bad.
Also guess my political stances moron you’d be wrong
The movie invented details because it's based on a book that also invented details - Blonde was a fictional book, not a biography. You want to get mad about extremely kino JFK rape name Joyce Carol Oats, not the movie.
Violent murder gore BASED
Sex and boobies DISGUSTING!!!
>biopic
I hide Reddit Letter Media threads on sight.
>low intelligence twitter take of some literal who e-celeb
>guaranteed 330 replies on Cinemaphile
Why is this?
>Looks like Jay got offended by nudity again
He isn't talking about nudity lol. If you saw the movie you would know.
It 100% is lol if you ever saw this midge talk about movies, you’d know
he was always like this
definition of fence sitting homosexual.
Lmao separating art from the artist should be the first thing anyone does and it's so fricking easy holy shit
b-but Mel Gibson said the bad words! That's definitely worse than all the rapists and pedos, no problem watching their movies.
He didn't even say any 'bad words'. He just called out something that is verboten.
this guy has never had an insightful thought in his life
literally, what is this homosexuals problem with sex? does he even have a gf? everything he says and does is like he hates being a man.
>no no not pussy anything but that
Mike fricked his teenage crush and made him gay
>I’M DYING LAUREN
Are we ignoring the fact that marylin monroe is portrayed as some dumb blonde who can't do shit?
Like isn't that kinda sexist bro, doesn't matter if the film is fricking amazing?
The prequels fricking sucked.
>NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T SHOW MY HECKIN' JFK AS A WOMANIZER AND PORTRAY ABORTION NEGATIVELY
Jay is a complete homosexual at this point.
If he was that’d be okay. He isn’t even a complete homosexual, he’s just like all the incels that hate woke shit, and he’s really bad at hiding it.
Why do all these people talk like MovieBob
Why is there so much white trash reviewing movies
It's...kinda weird?
Cry all you want - the Prequels still suck.