What would you like to see in the sequel?
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
M3GAN
What would you like to see in the sequel?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
|
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Why would they weaponize a dicky robot? Do they really think it will scare Incels?
Reprogramming a dicky robot that kills men is easier than to talk common sense into a stupid female c**t. Reprogrammed dicky robot will have sex with Incel men.
Full Penetration
What if they cast Dolph Lundgren as a scientist who can smell dicky?
There are many alternatives. The killer doll + Black Mirror tropes worked well in the 1st movie
cady sitting on my face
i’d rather not say
I didn't feel like she was all that evil.
I think she was the result of a stupid woman who rushed development and couldn't specify her commands no identify what she actually wanted the doll to do.
I think it would be fresh if the direction they took the sequel wasn't straight horror, but rather more of an anti-hero approach.
Her primary protocol is to protect whichever child she gets bonded to. So what happens if she enters a house hold where her bonded child is being abused?
What happens if an abused homeless orphan finds her in a dumpster?
I don't want to see 'chucky but a girl!' I want to see something different.
Everyone says Terminator 2 but Terminator 2 was cheating because it was technically the same guy playing a completely different character, they make it very clear that in spite of a similar appearance and mindset Schwarzenegger objectively wasn't that butthole that killed Kyle Reese and chased Sarah around the factory
Instead, I keep thinking about this movie, the sheer balls of its existence, that the studio actually saw the overwhelming sympathy and fondness audiences had for the psychotic blind man and so they cooked up the entire sequel scenario to just unambiguously make him the fricking hero. (In case you only saw the first one and you're curious, this time a little girl with a rare blood type stumbles into him, quickly followed by a team of criminals hired to butcher her and steal her organs for a rich butthole, and you can basically guess how the rest of the movie plays out)
Considering the reception M3gan has gotten I believe they can do the same thing. It takes very little to construct a scenario where she's the same person but her obsessive violent responses make her an edgy heroine instead of a slasher villain.
>Oh thank God, it's Jason Voorhees, boy are we glad to see you
- a group of frightened teenagers, once
Jason has always been a tragic figure though.
That said, I agree with the one anon, they're gonna turn M3gan into an anti-hero. Complete with an evil male robot to fight.
the old man was the hero on the first movie as well.
The first movie you were supposed to be rooting for Jane Levy. I mean, nobody was, but you were supposed to. Remember the script is essentially a wojak crying "NOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST RAPE AND MURDER A TEENAGE GIRL FOR BREAKING INTO YOUR HOUSE"
The sequel dispensed with the pretext entirely by bringing back the same guy, but this time pitting him against organ-stealing mercenaries pursuing a precocious child
I'm glad someone understands where I'm coming from.
I also find it very interesting when the villain role is flipped.
The terminator example was a very unique way of doing it and ultimately led to the success of T2.
I think the Megan sequel would find the same success if they made her, as you said, an edgy heroine.
But I think they should stick to the slasher theme, just play it in reverse.
Instead of following a bunch of kids trying to frick on spring break at a camp site, we follow a gang of criminals trying to harm a little boy or girl and get absolutely butchered.
Or...... The sequel could go a more action oriented route by having the military pick her up and deploy her in eastern Europe or Afghanistan.
I don't think that would be quite as interesting as the first idea, though.
>psychotic blind man
Umm... was he the baddie? Cause it didn't seem that way to me. Vet you cheered for the Black person in Law Abiding Citizen too.
>Don't Breathe
Terrible movie. Never seen the second one, but the first one is fricking awful. The fact that it even got a sequel is crazy.
>I didn't feel like she was all that evil.
She was an avenging angel metaphor: not sadistic but punitive. The movie's very clever in the way it criticizes lazy parental figures who dispatch their kids to tech surrogates instead of really connecting and listening to them
That is how i felt watching the movie. But I feel the marketing was at odd with that message.
Actually I like that the marketing was mis leading because it didn't give away the plot.
Megan was a rare good example of subverting expectations.
It gives me hope that they won't double down on her being an antagonist in the sequel.
I know what you mean: the trailer makes it seem as if it's a more by numbers flick instead of the nuanced, witty movie we get. It was a very nice surprise and as you say it subverts expectations in a great way, not least because it works fine as mainstream entertainment.
Will the inventor face any jail time over having created a machine responsible for several attempted murders as well as first degree and second degree homicide?
She's a woman, so the answer is no.
This is going to be a legal nightmare. If you create a sentient machine, are you responsible for what the machine does? Can you prove the machine is sentient? Can you prove it's not? I imagine this is going to be tied up in the courts for decades.
m3gan gets #metoo'd it's gonna be called m3toogan
A happy ending.
I want to see M3gan do sex
kinoooooo
Bring back Allison Williams and Violet Mcgraw, but recast the M3gan performer because having the robot "age up" doesn't make sense. Version 2 = aunt and niece have to team up to stop multiple M3gans developed by a rival company.
You sound like a writer for the series "Chucky"
And no, that's not a compliment
Zing!
Well what's your idea? I think a sequel would be forced regardless.