>Margot Robbie finally lead a hit, we can no longer call her Box Office Posion Queen anymore what do we do now?

>Margot Robbie finally lead a hit, we can no longer call her Box Office Posion Queen anymore what do we do now?
>don't worry senpai I just have the girl

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I honestly didn't even know the movie existed.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Make a girly movie that appeals to girls
    >It earns a billion dollars
    >Make an action movie that, for all intense and purposes, is built for men
    >Have it star a woman, and encourage journos to talk about how feminist it is

    All entertainment has been poisoned by a bunch of mentally unwell people who went down the toy aisle, saw the girl side was colored pink, and the boy side was colored blue, and then spent the rest of their lives thrashing against this.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >intense

      its intents brohammer

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        >all intense and purposes
        This Furiosa movie is apparently good but ace-value it just comes off like a diamond dozen girl power movie. Those types of movies won't cut it in the doggy dog world of 2024 show business.

        STOP MAKING ME FUN OF MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Posters like you are diamond dozen.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >intense

      its intents brohammer

      >all intense and purposes
      This Furiosa movie is apparently good but ace-value it just comes off like a diamond dozen girl power movie. Those types of movies won't cut it in the doggy dog world of 2024 show business.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        So many girl-boss movies have been utter shite, so even when there’s a good one the audience stays away.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          The law of unintended consequences in full effect, people are completely repelled by female led action films now. Good job woketards.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            It’s even worse in the gaming industry where the projects take many more years and thousands more hours of effort only to be completely destroyed by an offputting female lead. Almost every single title revealed this weekend in the various gaming shows looks incredible visually and technically, but will all be complete financial disasters due solely to their abrasive, ugly female protagonists.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >intense and purposes
      it's "intensive purposes"

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        the only correct anon itt

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Stents & purpoises

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        > For all intents and purposes.

        Read it. Learn it. Rise above your american ways.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It's actually "incense and poppy seeds"

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        *thare

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        intents and purposes*

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >all intense and purposes
      moron

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It's in tents and porpoises

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >All entertainment has been poisoned by a bunch of mentally unwell people who went down the toy aisle, saw the girl side was colored pink, and the boy side was colored blue, and then spent the rest of their lives thrashing against this.

      Don't forget it's also these delusional tards who then saw boys wearing pink and girls wearing blue and decided that meant that boys were girls and girls were boys and started pumping the kids full of hormones and cutting off their dicks/breasts.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        it really is that bleak isn't it?
        they really are that moronic
        it's like ape level logic
        and no i'm not talking about just Black person apes
        im trying to be less racist and homophobic these days but i mean what the frick

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It's inversion, which is a satanic goal. Up is down, black is white, boys are girls. The satanists have taken control. They're not winning but they sure are fricking everything up on purpose. Why do you think every established media property is getting a gender and race swap? It doesn't make money and nobody likes it but it's happening anyway. Money isn't the goal, destroying the culture is. They think once they get rid of the old established world they will build back better a new one in their image. Change. Constant permanent change is the true goal of leftism. Good or bad, it doesn't matter so long as everything is in a constant flux. These people are evil.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Barbie made a billion dollars.
            Why can’t chuds stop making up things to get mad about?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Exceptions only reinforce the rule. Woke types clinging to "b-but Barbie was a hit" are only fooling themselves bc dozens of other woke movies flopped

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Barbie's success was 100% on Ken and Ryan Gosling. Hollywood deluded themselves into thinking anything else was responsible.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        this, its the only reason I saw it and its literally the only thing people remember from the movie.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          That's cope. People saw it because it's Barbie, even if Ken resonated as a character more than actual Barbie.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Frick you I prefer scenes with Barbie meeting the Architect. Ken was not in the story by the time that was resolved.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      ESL

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      They’re called “Cultural Hegelians” and yes they’re mentally ill. All leftists are

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It gets worse, Furiosa was originally supposed to be a direct-to-DVD companion for Fury Road, like the Animatrix. But the production of Fury Road was kind of a disaster and they fully expected to lose their shirts on it, so they refused to spend any money on any other Mad Max stuff at the time.
      Anyway then Fury Road became a cult hit, and years later some genius suit remembered that there was this whole other finished Mad Max script just lying around, so they decided to put it into production, as a major theatrical release, for this intended home video companion piece nearly ten years after the actual movie came out.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      They were just getting 2 birds stoned at once. Worst case ontario it flops. Same risk every movie makes.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      *incels and tortoises

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      homie this just didnt happen, you are punching the air

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >The past 10 years of cinema didn't happen

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        No arguments, refutation, just a worthless opinion?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It's all Cinemaphile Ents and poor pussies

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty fricking spot on. Also I want them to increase their delusion because Hollywood is now so infested with this delusional religion that it needs to crumble entirely to the ground in order to heal.

      >intense

      its intents brohammer

      It's it's, friend.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >>Make an action movie that, for all intense
      stopped reading right there

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Could have been phoneposting with its moronic spellcheck, my troony friend.

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Girl Boss Fatigue

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Hire cute alien blonde
    >Cover her in filth

    For what purpose? There goes the majority of her appeal

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but what if she wears a croptop and you have to stare at her dirty sweaty tummy all movie long

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Not even top 5? That could be the end of girlboss movies. As of Saturday is was in an already humiliating, disastrous 5th place (after Watchers, whose box office was considered underwhelming and below tracking).

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >That could be the end of girlboss movies
      lol
      lmao

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        That ship may be sailing. Reality has abundantly shown that the "Blackrock will foot the bill even if the movies lose money" isn't happening because girlbosses are making ppl more antagonistic/indifferent to the concept

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Meanwhile Garfield is at a 208 mil box office with a 50 mil budget.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Garfield had a weak opening but has had good "legs" and is definitely going to end up as a pretty decent success for the studio.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Garfield got excellent wom. Even on the OW it did okay numbers (30 mil I think) but that was practically a draw with Furiosa which cost over 3x as much and had astronomical marketing costs.
        Afterwards it took the 1st place, connected to audiences worldwide (including the US and China among others) and still has a lot of summer runway as a family viewing alternative. A sequel is at this point a foregone conclusion.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Had to google cat penis to picture the meme

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Based. Years upon years of trying to make wokeslop stick and it’s still handily beaten by a character invented in the 1970s whose only jokes are being fat and lazy.

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Garfield: Generic CG slop of a smirking and quipping throw-away character to sit your moronic kid in front of like any Minions movie
    >Furiosa: ???

    Who's the audience for Furisoa? Certainly not Mad Max fans, all four of them, three of which are probably Japanese

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The numbers indicate that despite being a family/children's movie Garfield took viewers away from Furiosa, as in casuals who wanted to go watch a movie realized Garfiled was the better option.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >as in casuals who wanted to go watch a movie realized Garfiled was the better option.
        grim kek

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        That's fricking hilarious. I bet the studio really hates Mondays now

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I dont think people are choosing between the animated Garfield movie or the R rated action movie

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Studios are so fricking stupid they literally made a movie only RLM ball washers could like and then their surprised when it flops.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >movie only RLM ball washers could like

        Bro, just wait for the flood of low budget indie feminist movies that will save all the cinema multiplexes, you will apologise to Mike Stocklasa.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >three of which are probably Japanese
      Who are the two besides Hideo Kojima.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Yea they essentially spat on the prime audience and failed to attract the non-existant girlboss following.
      Hardcore Mad Max fans like me still enjoyed the movie because the action scenes were still decent. But your random dude who doesnt care about the franchise isnt going to buy a ticket with some scrawny b***h on the poster and woeful CGI trailer.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Since when is Garfield a throwaway character? Might as well say Frasier is a throwaway character from Cheers despite getting his own media.

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    So Barbie is no longer feminist propaganda because it made money?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It was a hit despite the feminist propaganda attempt. Women enjoyed its girlishness, the heterosexual romance, Ken etc

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It failed completely at femishit propaganda since everyone who saw it only cared about Ken.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        how is it "propaganda" you homosexual?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Patriarchy is leftgroid conspiracy theory utterly disconnected from any observable reality, just like everything these morons believe in.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >HOW IS THIS FEMINIST MOVIE PROPAGANDA ASKED THE TRANCEL

    • 1 week ago
      CreepyThinMan

      It was a hit despite the feminist propaganda attempt. Women enjoyed its girlishness, the heterosexual romance, Ken etc

      It failed completely at femishit propaganda since everyone who saw it only cared about Ken.

      Barbie is about a woman who has a first world problem existential crisis because she's now post-wall while it's symbolic that things start going bad in her world as she's now getting older and can't maintain her life of luxury and leisure anymore because she never had any value beyond her looks which are depleting by the second along with her financial status as a result of no longer being able to manipulate simps into supporting her.

      It should also be noted that while a blonde hair blue eyed white Barbie is the lead there’s a “diverse” collage of other Barbies that are black, trans, fat, cripple etc… while the Ken’s are all more-or-less handsome men in good shape showing the atypical female hypocrisy that women believe they should be accepted no matter what condition they’re in and never have to improve themselves, mirroring their narcissism, sense of self-entitlement and real world push to force people to accept fat and ugly women in media while men are expected to be 10/10’s and publicly shamed if they’re fat and/or ugly.

      In the movie Barbie (Margot Robbie) goes to the “real world” with Ken (Ryan Gosling) where he learns about the “Patriarchy” and how men in that world are valued and have control over their lives compared to Barbieland where Ken’s are treated as accessories, have no power nor even shelter at night.

      • 1 week ago
        CreepyThinMan

        Ken comes back from the real world and implements a patriarchal system that these people behind this film depict as a fascist totalitarian dictatorship when the truth is that an equilibrium was achieved where the Barbies and Ken’s live together in harmony. But when Robbie Barbie returns from the real world she and the others create a scheme to pit the Ken’s against each other in order for the Barbies to once again assert dominance, take control and make the Ken’s second class citizens and overturn what amounts to a slave revolt.

        The rise of the Ken's is a metaphor for how these women see themselves getting older with their options slowly dwindling and create this fantasy in their minds that they're now being dominated by a patriarchal system of evil white straight men which only suddenly began to control their lives once they started pushing 30 and use it as an excuse as to why they didn't make something of themselves because of their narcissistic sense of self-entitlement where they think because they want something it means that they deserve it.

        Tricking the Ken's into fighting each other is also meant to represent women undermining society to their benefit and the detriment of stability because of women's sociopathic need to create drama by inserting themselves into anything men create and/or care about that takes attention away from them and destroying it as they have done in the real world with movies, tv shows, videogames, comicbooks and western civilization in general.

        So the message of this film is that women can only be happy subjugating men and getting everything handed to them with no adversity or hardship while it reveals that feminism was never about equality, only gaining attention and power over men.

        People think that the movie is satire that makes fun of feminism but the truth is that Greta Gerwig is a turbofeminist who lacks self awareness so she went full moron and inadvertently made Barbie a parody of feminism!!!FACT!!!

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          The film is also Marxist dialectic, which is a strange structure for a movie.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            homie what the frick where, when?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Sparkling retort. Look up what Marxist dialectic is.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Here you go, my uneducated homie:
              Marxist dialectic is a method of understanding and analyzing societal change and development. It is based on the idea that societal progress occurs through the conflict of opposing forces. Here's a simplified breakdown:

              Thesis: This represents the status quo or an existing state of affairs in society.
              Antithesis: This is the opposition to the thesis, a force that challenges the status quo.
              Synthesis: The conflict between the thesis and antithesis leads to a resolution, which is a new state of affairs. This new state becomes the new thesis, and the process repeats.
              In Marxist theory, this dialectical process is seen primarily in the context of class struggle. For example, the conflict between the bourgeoisie (thesis) and the proletariat (antithesis) is expected to lead to a new, classless society (synthesis). This method aims to explain how and why societal changes happen and how contradictions within society drive historical development.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Sparkling retort. Look up what Marxist dialectic is.

                No where in the Barbie movie you fricking idiots, thanks to the internet an 8 year old knows what dialectics are, I mean where in the Barbie movie.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                You seem cognitively low-functioning. This is now the end of my interaction with you.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, so the answer is no where in the movie, you just made shit up, I accept your concession and apology.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't like someone dismissed me because I am too stupid to understand anything and also have extremely low self esteem so I will tell myself I won on an anonymous internet message board

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                But enough about you.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Ken comes back from the real world and implements a patriarchal system that these people behind this film depict as a fascist totalitarian dictatorship when the truth is that an equilibrium was achieved where the Barbies and Ken’s live together in harmony. But when Robbie Barbie returns from the real world she and the others create a scheme to pit the Ken’s against each other in order for the Barbies to once again assert dominance, take control and make the Ken’s second class citizens and overturn what amounts to a slave revolt.

        The rise of the Ken's is a metaphor for how these women see themselves getting older with their options slowly dwindling and create this fantasy in their minds that they're now being dominated by a patriarchal system of evil white straight men which only suddenly began to control their lives once they started pushing 30 and use it as an excuse as to why they didn't make something of themselves because of their narcissistic sense of self-entitlement where they think because they want something it means that they deserve it.

        Tricking the Ken's into fighting each other is also meant to represent women undermining society to their benefit and the detriment of stability because of women's sociopathic need to create drama by inserting themselves into anything men create and/or care about that takes attention away from them and destroying it as they have done in the real world with movies, tv shows, videogames, comicbooks and western civilization in general.

        So the message of this film is that women can only be happy subjugating men and getting everything handed to them with no adversity or hardship while it reveals that feminism was never about equality, only gaining attention and power over men.

        People think that the movie is satire that makes fun of feminism but the truth is that Greta Gerwig is a turbofeminist who lacks self awareness so she went full moron and inadvertently made Barbie a parody of feminism!!!FACT!!!

        The Starship Troopers effect.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          No chud, you don't understand, its a critique of fascism, if you don't get that you must have low media literacy

        • 1 week ago
          CreepyThinMan

          No chud, you don't understand, its a critique of fascism, if you don't get that you must have low media literacy

          In 1997 Starship Troopers was released, Directed by Paul Verhoeven and based on the novel of the same name by Robert A. Heinlein published in 1959 about soldiers fighting giant bugs in outer space. Despite that it was a serious novel as Heinlein had served in the US Navy and wanted to use Sci-fi as allegory for various social/political issues based on his point of view.

          Some people took the film adaptation seriously and thought that Verhoeven had made a movie that advocated fascism when it was the complete opposite as he was quoted that the point of the movie was to show that a utopia filled with beautiful people was good for nothing other than killing bugs. The problem was that people, especially critics, didn’t understand that he had made a movie that satirized militarism and totalitarianism which was his intent from the start and blatantly obvious, I mean, they have Doogie Fricking Houser (Neil Patrick Harris) dressed like a member of the Nazi Gestapo with pretty people killing space wienerroaches fer frick sakes!?!

          The evidence is that Verhoeven's 1987 film Robocop was a satirical take on 1980’s culture, specifically corporate culture, while it was Co-Scripted by Edward Neumeier who went on to adapt Starship Troopers. How anyone couldn’t see the movie as anything other than satire is beyond me, but it was Verhoeven’s follow up to Showgirls which was universally despised by the mainstream press who no doubt had their knives out for him and disingenuously reviewed the film as military propaganda.

          • 1 week ago
            CreepyThinMan

            It should also be noted that while a blonde hair blue eyed white Barbie is the lead there’s a “diverse” collage of other Barbies that are black, trans, fat, cripple etc… while the Ken’s are all more-or-less handsome men in good shape showing the atypical female hypocrisy that women believe they should be accepted no matter what condition they’re in and never have to improve themselves, mirroring their narcissism, sense of self-entitlement and real world push to force people to accept fat and ugly women in media while men are expected to be 10/10’s and publicly shamed if they’re fat and/or ugly.

            In the movie Barbie (Margot Robbie) goes to the “real world” with Ken (Ryan Gosling) where he learns about the “Patriarchy” and how men in that world are valued and have control over their lives compared to Barbieland where Ken’s are treated as accessories, have no power nor even shelter at night.

            Ken comes back from the real world and implements a patriarchal system that these people behind this film depict as a fascist totalitarian dictatorship when the truth is that an equilibrium was achieved where the Barbies and Ken’s live together in harmony. But when Robbie Barbie returns from the real world she and the others create a scheme to pit the Ken’s against each other in order for the Barbies to once again assert dominance, take control and make the Ken’s second class citizens and overturn what amounts to a slave revolt.

            • 1 week ago
              CreepyThinMan

              So the message of this film is that women can only be happy subjugating men and getting everything handed to them with no adversity or hardship while it reveals that feminism was never about equality, only gaining attention and power over men.

              In conclusion, with Starship Troopers Verhoeven took a serious source material and deliberately made it into a satire compared to Greta Gerwing’s Barbie where she took a girls toy and decided to make it into a serious tome on feminism and patriarchal oppression under the guise of a light hearted comedy but because feminists and women in general aren’t funny and have a complete and utter lack of self-awareness they’re now labelling Barbie as a subversive satirical masterpiece when the truth is that Gerwig went soo far up her own ass by turning Barbie into misandrist intersectional feminist propaganda that it inadvertently turned in on itself becoming a parody of that ideology which simply amounts to hating men because women never intellectually, mentally and emotionally develop beyond grade school and their Daddy issues.

              !!!FACT!!!

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                And the proof is in the pudding as they say.
                All of the greatest and most memorable female characters were all written and developed by men.
                All the ''actress'' had to do was play the part written for her.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            This is a weird comparison.
            Starship Troopers was meant to be criticism/parody of fascism from the beginning.
            It's not meant to be a "hidden meaning" or "read between the lines" kind of deal. It's actually pretty blatant in its message.
            It wasn't the first time, nor it will be the last time that critics of the time didn't "get" a movie.

            On the other hand, Barbie was always meant to be a feminist movie. Ken stole the show, mostly because Gosling himself is very likeable, but people are unironically reading too much into that flick.
            Any instance of apparent criticism to feminism is due to the filmmakers incompetence. There really is nothing more to it.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              i really cant remember anything barbie did in that movie. it really was all gosling that carried it

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >Any instance of apparent criticism to feminism is due to the filmmakers incompetence.
              I believe that's the point the other feller intends to make.
              In their efforts to extol the virtues of feminism, all they've managed to do is prove what an utter crock of shit it is because they possess as much self-awareness as a fricking toaster.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Ken comes back from the real world and implements a patriarchal system that these people behind this film depict as a fascist totalitarian dictatorship when the truth is that an equilibrium was achieved where the Barbies and Ken’s live together in harmony. But when Robbie Barbie returns from the real world she and the others create a scheme to pit the Ken’s against each other in order for the Barbies to once again assert dominance, take control and make the Ken’s second class citizens and overturn what amounts to a slave revolt.

        The rise of the Ken's is a metaphor for how these women see themselves getting older with their options slowly dwindling and create this fantasy in their minds that they're now being dominated by a patriarchal system of evil white straight men which only suddenly began to control their lives once they started pushing 30 and use it as an excuse as to why they didn't make something of themselves because of their narcissistic sense of self-entitlement where they think because they want something it means that they deserve it.

        Tricking the Ken's into fighting each other is also meant to represent women undermining society to their benefit and the detriment of stability because of women's sociopathic need to create drama by inserting themselves into anything men create and/or care about that takes attention away from them and destroying it as they have done in the real world with movies, tv shows, videogames, comicbooks and western civilization in general.

        So the message of this film is that women can only be happy subjugating men and getting everything handed to them with no adversity or hardship while it reveals that feminism was never about equality, only gaining attention and power over men.

        People think that the movie is satire that makes fun of feminism but the truth is that Greta Gerwig is a turbofeminist who lacks self awareness so she went full moron and inadvertently made Barbie a parody of feminism!!!FACT!!!

        This is unequivocally based.
        It's also a shining example of what happens every other time the libshits, feminists, and homosexuals of the world try to ''own'' the other side.
        All they ever do is point out how moronic they themselves are and why their self centered worldview will never work in the real world.
        It's both hysterical and depressing at the same time.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      the advertising campaign was superb
      people went in thinking it was a simple dumb, fun chick flick
      if they had advertised it as a progressive, le men bad, feminist movie, it wouldn't have done nearly as well

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Stupid story
    >Stupid characters
    >Ugly CG
    >Unattractive and uncool girlboss

    No surprise it was a total failure. Get some hot chicks and give them sexy camera angles and cool stuff to do and people will watch the movie

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      These movies were dumb, but they did a great job on casting and costumes

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      These movies were dumb, but they did a great job on casting and costumes

      and female keanu reeves is less gay?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      These movies were dumb, but they did a great job on casting and costumes

      Sexo with Jill

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    LOTSA SPAGHETTI

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Luigi, look! It's from Bowser!

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >margot robbie played one of the most recognized IPs in history and it was a success
    >it must be because it was her
    This is like those stupid influencers that say that they worked with Universal Studios or Disneyland and it was a resounding success.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      She was an executive producer on it. She had substantial creative input. She wasn't just showing up on set to act in front of a camera

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        She didn't create the IP, which is so well known and beloved by girls and women that most if not all related products are going to be successful simply by putting "Barbie" in the title. She stood on the shoulder of a giant success to begin with

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Guess how much money the last movie with barbie in its name made

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Bro, you can put me on the Barbie project and I could have created anything and it was going to do good.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >could have created anything and it was going to do good.
          Guess how much money the last movie with barbie in its name made

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Oof, that sentence structure.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I'm pretty sure most big leads are executive producers now, it's one way they protect their image.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Robbie wasn't an EP on Babylon, Amsterdam, or the James Gunn Suicide Squad

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Robbie put her own money for the production. After a string of flops this was basically her last chance in Hollywood.
      Feminists are scum, but she did something very non-feminist - took responsibility for her own life and I have to respect that

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >everyone nitpicking "intense and purposes" anon
    >nobody pointing out that OP wrote "lead" instead of "led"

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I liked the first two mad max movies. I would've gone to a new one with Mel, and maybe Hardy. But this movie was supposed to be a womyn movie so I thought it would be misogynistic if I entered womyn space and watched it. Plus the ranjeet video game CGI looked bad. Hope the womyn enjoyed their movie!

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >spin-off prequel for a side character from a movie released almost a decade ago without the original actress
    Why the frick did ANYONE think this was gonna be profitable?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      And an uglified, skeevy-looking main character

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I know a lot of anons here think Anya is ugly, but I want to stick my tongue in her ass and swirl it around her sweaty shitter

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Niche film series that's fan base are largely Anglo males in their 30's+
    >Doesn't do well in an age where Anglo males in their 30's+ are a minority

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >take series that's been established as high octane car chases with a badass wasteland warrior
      >turn it into girlboss cgi garbage
      Only a complete moron thought this was the right decision for the mad max saga.

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Who was this movie even made for?
    >alienates men
    >women don't want to see this grimy garbage
    Was this another Hollywood money laundering operation?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >alienates men
      i wouldnt call you a man

  18. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >action movie starring women are bad no matter what now
    I really hate that the culture war has infected peoples' brains so bad that we can't just have male and female heroes because that's what a creator genuinely felt like doing.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      You don't think if you make a string of shit female-lead action movies, the audience is not going to turn out for the next one even if it's good?

      Pirate movies were completely poison until Pirates of the Caribbean managed to turn it around. We just need to wait for that one female-led action movie that can do the same for its genre.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Hannah was a good female leadsction movie

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I think people are mad at the marketing. The women power ads and media quotes have been fully exhausted and target demos are annoyed. Now audiences are conditioned to see women as a lead, I don’t need to see it since it’s the most feminist “x since y”

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Half the time the things I see people getting mad about are not actually being "marketed" as culture war things, annoying morons just force their stupid conversation into everything. If you tried hard enough you can see political messages in anything.

        Like the Super Mario Bros. movie. If it had come out say 10 years ago, it'd probably be a completely unremarkable kid's animated movie, but you have dipshits acting like it was this great battleground against/for "woke" shit and often the same people couldn't even make up their minds which one it was.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Mario's trailers all focused on Peach being a girlboss, and in this climate, that was a red flag.

          It turns out the movie wasn't that, but we can only thank Nintendo for being here, as if we let Hollywood had their way, Mario would simply be the bumbling sidekick that gets in Peach's way, and also she's the main character.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            They already hinted at her having a big backstory they could explore, if that keeps you up at night.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, I'm sure Peach: A Super Mario Brother's Story would totally do well, joining the ranks of Furiosa and Ballerina if that shit ever gets released.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                And I'm sure Illumination not being in the habit of spending $200 or more on box office bombs is not going to announce what you're saying, just doing more Peach stuff which might annoy the odd chud and not do much else.

                Peach and Taylor-Joy are going to be interjoined for a generation of movies when Sonic can get a trilogy and a spin-off, the writing is on the wall.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Mario's trailers all focused on Peach being a girlboss
            A one second shot of Peach picking up a weapon or whatever when like 80% of a 2 minute trailer is Mario running around the Mushroom Kingdom is not "focusing" on anything.

          • 1 week ago
            CreepyThinMan

            >Mario's trailers all focused on Peach being a girlboss, and in this climate, that was a red flag.
            >It turns out the movie wasn't that, but we can only thank Nintendo for being here, as if we let Hollywood had their way, Mario would simply be the bumbling sidekick that gets in Peach's way, and also she's the main character.

            Apparently the guys at Nintendo saw Universal pushing that shit in the original screenplay and told them to re-write it because they didn't want identity politics fricking up their potential billion dollar grossing film.

            I also love how it was the left along with Disney shills labelling the movie as woke to turn off customers but once it was obvious it was a huge hit they started claiming it as a win and claiming that it was a success because it was woke when that isn't the case.

            People go on about Peach being a "girlboss" but the way I see it she understands that world better than Mario and Luigi so she'd be able to navigate it better but it never takes away that it's Mario's movie and he is still the lead character and allowed to be heroic!!!FACT!!!

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The woman's 120 pounds?
    Where in real life do you see her beating up anybody?? With a wiry dude at least there could be a possibility of strong ligaments and fast which muscles..
    ... hey guys let's make a man movie with the weak chick..It's just dumb.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Well she did bunch dementus in the face a whole bunch with no effect

  20. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >prequels LE BAD because the ending already LE SPOILED
    can anyone explain this moron mentality to me?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Prequel works better when the prequel is for the setting or lore rather than the specific character.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        why?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      There's no tension. Furiosa joins joe and anything between that and the start is filler characters who will certainly die because they don't show up later.
      It's why the prequels didn't work. Besides shedding some light on events we know what happens. All the jedi die, some clones fight, darth vader gets burned, and the emperor takes over the republic. It's just spinning wheels.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        You don't need tension for a story to be good

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          lmao. Ya the deep and inspiring story of mad max the movie about car driving rapists in the desert.

  21. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Man, Furiosa flopped hard. It was a mistake to make a sequel that is a prequel 9 years removed from Fury Road. Clearly word-of-mouth didn't even help.

  22. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It just felt like such a big step down from Fury Road in every regard, it wasn’t worth the nearly decade long wait for a new movie in the franchise.
    I wish Miller had just gone ahead with making that Mad Max Wasteland movie instead of this unnecessary one but now he’ll probably never get funding for kino again.

  23. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I liked the movie, but I'm glad it's flopping.
    No more 'Male' IPs being handed over to girls.

  24. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Fury road sucked and this was better than fury road

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Sure if you have shit taste

  25. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    People thought Fury Road was a bait and switch. Let's be honest, people wanted to see the old Mad Max, perhaps with Gibson and a grown son with an interesting backstory. Historically, if the apocalypse ever happens, women would cower just as history has shown repeatedly. Just stop.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Fury Road did show that women were mostly just breeding chattel and milk producers.

  26. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I think Princess Peach will do fine by the time she gets another Split role, and if not I will shelter her without making her go for the groceries.

  27. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I was already hesitant to watch because the idea of returning characters in a Mad Max film (other than Max) seemed against the spirit of the franchise. When they showed horrific CGI in the trailer, I decided not to watch it. If you want me to see your film, don't put ugly pajeet CGI in your fricking highlight reel.

  28. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >try to be a girl boss
    >get buck broken by a cat
    barbed penis

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      "AhAHhhHAhhhhAH...the Floppiosa...Whine..."
      >Doesn't she say something

  29. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    "It's the casting. If Chris Hemsworth had been the lead, people would have lined up in droves. He's already proven himself as an action star with movies like Extraction. And don't get me started on Extraction 2, where they pushed a woke agenda with a Hindu woman taking down big Burley dudes.
    Wake up..it's a mind virus and box office poison

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The movie really should have just been about Dementus and his rise and fall as a wasteland warlord, I actually quite enjoyed Hemsworth in the role and was way more interested in his character than I ever was with Furiosa in the film.
      Hell I would’ve liked to have seen how he became so revered by his followers in the first place and how he lost his family, he’s like Mad Max if he got corrupted by power.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        He was the only likeable character in the movie, how am I supposed to root for the main character when I don’t like her and prefer the “villain” over her?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Almsot half the extras beside him have more expressions and a tangible charisma to their appearance here, from left to right
        >lean boomer warrior
        >boomer Jorah Mormont-esque guy with his hands together
        >the fatass behind him
        Hemsworth's facial hair even looks fake as shit here they just fricked up the production bigly

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Chris Hemsworth really struggles outside of Thor. It's actually surprising that he does such a good Thor when you realize how shit of an actor he really is when you watch him in any other role. The man has zero charisma, always looks like an instagram model playing a movie character

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Nah Hemsworth is a shit actor and just dudebros his way through his roles. Zero depth, he's got nothing but flops as a leading man outside of capeshit and Netflix straight to the bin releases.

  30. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Just can't be arsed to watch it, simple as

  31. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >ATJ
    How does she keep getting work? She's so bad

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      she was great in both queens gambit and peaky blinders
      she was simply miscast in this one

  32. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    A friend went to see it yesterday and when he went to buy tickets online the entire room was empty. He did say he thought the movie was very good.

  33. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Well is poisoned now and they have only themselves to blame
    Hasta la vista, invaders

  34. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It's a colossal misstep because it was a prequel nobody wanted.
    You get ALL of Furiosa's story in Fury Road. Everything that needs to be said about her is learned in that movie and honestly nobody went to see Fury Road to see Furiosa, they went to see it because it was a spectacle and an interesting updated take on the Mad Max franchise.

    If they made another Mad Max movie with Hardy and just placed him in a new setting so he can do his Mad Max thing in it, it would be another hit. Instead they thought literally anyone gives a shit about a side character that was merely tolerated.
    Not to mention that Anya looks NOTHING like Charlize so what the frick was up with that anyway?!

  35. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It was a good film. Great action set pieces and really builds the world of Mad Max .

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >really builds the world of Mad Max .
      >movie has no max
      kek

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Mad Max is a big portion of the movie. But they chose the wrong guy.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Max is in it. He rescues Furiosa.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Mad Max is a big portion of the movie. But they chose the wrong guy.

          He's a noncharacter and he's only there to justify the IP being hijacked by some OC. On top of being miscast.
          Stop huffing copium

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >"no max"
            >"he's only there to..."

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              He's only there for 5 seconds

  36. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Casting this alien toddler woman as anything action related was a terrible mistake

  37. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Romanian version was better.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >polish dating tv

  38. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >6th place in its fourth weekend
    >Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes made more in its 6th weekend than Furiosa has in its 4th
    People are going out of their way to avoid watching it.

  39. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    A movie no one asked for failed? Say it ain't so.

  40. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I watched this movie earlier tonight and I couldn't stop farting for the whole movie, then when I checked the runtime at the end there were still 30 minutes to go so I fast forwarded it and then ate 4 ice cream sandwiches

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Insightful and thought-provoking

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      is it streaming?

  41. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Buccalosa: The Ayylmao Warrior
    Maybe going for the intergalactic audience was a mistake.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Buccalosa 2
      >Her transformation is not yet complete.

  42. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    What I always dont get about shit like this, is that the story telling formula is literally known for 2000 years or more. It will never get boring just do heroes journey over and over and over again. Cast a protagonist(male), deuteragonist, antagonist, wise mentor and a 'shadowy figure' make up some bullshit and boom. You will sell tickets. It never gets boring literally for thousends of years we have done this and seemingly cant get enough of it

  43. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick would come out and call this a feminist-anything?
    >Feminist revenge movie!
    Dude that fricking word is abhorrent to any straight man. You can't package Girl Power to men. Anime gets away with it because the girls are fricking hot, drawn hot and do a bunch of cool shit. Not sit around and do "feminist revenge" things, whatever the frick that even means.

  44. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Poorly advertised. Men won't go out of their way to see if but if someone put it on and everyone drinking and watching it they'd have a good time either shitting on it or enjoying it. I mean, for what it is. You can't have a Mad Max movie without Mad Max and that limp dick proxy Jack isn't it.

  45. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Hurry up and go to digital!

  46. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    When Hollyisraelite will fricking learn that Covid and race swapping killed cinema? Only big names like Barbie can make cash

  47. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  48. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    frick, she's hideous. honky women are trash and gross.

  49. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I thought the point of Mad Max was that each movie had a different aesthetic and setting to go with its story, why the frick did they make a prequel to Fury Road?

  50. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why did they cake her face with shit? Tom Hardy didn't have shit on his face in Fury Road, just the cool prisoner mask.

  51. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Go woke go broke

  52. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >see the trailer
    >oh look, a warrior girl movie
    >2005 playstation CGI
    >zero interest to see this movie

    the real question is, WHAT WAS MILLER EXPECTING TO HAPPEN.

    did the fricking IDIOT actually expected me to WATCH THIS MOVIE?

  53. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Also, if you want to have a female as the lead for an action movie, she has to be super-hot and athletic. Not a weird looking malnourished and frail ayyylmao that looks like couldn't lift a 10 lbs bag over her head or ever put her hands in cold water without fainting. Terrible, horrible casting.

  54. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    What is ruining Star Wars?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >fans
      >blinded by their hate

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        How can someone be a fan of something they haven't even seen yet?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >why are you shitting on my plate?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Why would you be a fan of a restaurant that you've never actually eaten at?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              I completely misread your post. I thought you said why would you hate something you've never seen

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      This will get people to watch.

      Also, it's interesting how leftist have only love/hate dichotomy. If you don't love x, you must hate it. If you don't love gays, you hate them. There's no "don't care" opinion. Or anything in between. But I guess that's normal for fundamentalists and extremists.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        You mean you love something or you're afraid of it, which is even more bizarre

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >If you don't love x, you must hate it. If you don't love gays, you hate them. There's no "don't care" opinion. Or anything in between.

        Leftoids and israelites can only deal in absolutes

        >I'm not really enjoying this 3 minute long gay bearded men French kissing scene in my video game adaption movie of Tomb Raider
        >Wow, you don't like it? You must hate gay people then!
        >Can you stop poisoning my well, please?
        >Oy vey, antisemitism! Why are the goyim always trying to gas me?!

  55. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I don't go to the theatre because my area is unpleasant and I'm typically too tired from work. There's also no movies that look good. I imagine a large portion of the population also feels this way.

  56. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >make mad max share his role with a strong woman
    >it kinda flops
    >make mad max movie without mad max and only strong woman
    >it completely flops
    Are we finally done with this experiment? How many more times do we need to repeat the exact same thing?
    Man dont want to watch an action movie with bogged woman and woman dont want to watch action movies period
    >b-b-but muh streaming
    cope

  57. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Are those those things trannies shove up their ass to simulate child birth?

  58. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Furiosa has been an interesting case where you can regularly see normies observing the virtue signal phenomena existing in the virtual world while failing to manifest in reality. Evryone who talks about it seems to express the same basic puzzlement, they only hear good things and yet the movie bombed. They simply can't seem to parse the idea that kneejerk lipservice on social media may not be the accurate real world reflection as they've come to accept.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Oh frick off. Nobody saw it because nobody wanted to see a prequel.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        people wanted to see the Hunger games prequel, a prequel to a film with a female lead

  59. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >cost 168 million
    >grossed 144 million
    welp

  60. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Garfield needs around 150 million to break even
    >Easily goes past that.
    >Furiosa needs around 420 million to break even
    >Current box office can’t even cover the production cost of the movie
    Lmao

  61. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    NOBODY WANTED A MAD MAX MOVIE ABOUT A WOMAN WITHOUT MAD MAX IN IT.

    THIS IS WORSE THAN THE LATEST MORTAL KOMBAT MOVIE WHERE THEY EXPLICITLY STATE IN THE MOVIE 'THERE WILL BE NO TOURNAMENT THIS TIME'.

    STOP TRYING TO SUBVERT AUDIENCE EXPECTATIONS WITH CULTURAL AGITPROP PROGRAMMING AND GET MAD WHEN AUDIENCES SUBVERT YOUR EXPECTATIONS OF THEIR EXPECTATIONS BY NOT SHOWING UP.

  62. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The delusion of people like RLM who cannot admit a girl boss lead destroys profits is hilarious to witness. Even better after the internal leaks from whatever gaming company it was that admitted how much their sales nosedive when the protagonist is a woman.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >the internal leaks from whatever gaming company it was that admitted how much their sales nosedive when the protagonist is a woman.
      Classic schizo headcanon

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >mind raped leftist unable to acknowledge reality
        Never surprising, always entertaining

  63. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    This is actually sad. Nobody cares about anything anymore

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Audiences just want black people in movies, like the new bad boys. White people can't stand the sight of whites, even in movies. Hemsworth and Anya are repellent to moviegoers

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *