>During filming for upcoming horror movie MaXXXine, an background extra alleges Mia Goth deliberately kicked him in the head, causing a concussion.
>The extra was lying on the ground covered in fake blood pretending to be dead, while Mia Goth was supposed to step over him and run away, the extra alleges that Goth deliberately kicked him in the head with her boot.
>the extra is also suing the director Ti West and the production company A24
I would pay $1k for her to kick me in the head with her low hanging boobas flopping around
I can't even imagine the level of desperation needed to be this thirsty. Absolutely pathetic, anon.
Maybe I'm just rich
No he's right, money doesn't mean you aren't a desperate homosexual, Elliot Rogers.
you disgust me
You can be into femdom without being a simp, you know. At the end of the day you're still you're using prostitutes for your own gratification without giving them more respect than they deserve.
yeah but you do that in the privacy of her dominatrix dungeon, and chat before and after the belts come on. Not that public humiliation to mickey mouse b***hes.
society is collapsing
Stop shaving your eyebrows dumb b***h
Thats not natty?
It's natty.
no
tell that to this homosexual
I did
he has lupus.
Knives aren’t sold unsheathed and uncovered idiot
and coffees aren't sold without a lid
>lays on ground as an extra
>actress accidentally kicks you in the head
>sue her
America everyone
>dont just sue her
>sue the director, the production company, the key grip and the kid who gets everyone coffee
>the key grip and the kid who gets everyone coffee
>reeeeeeeeeee!!!!
Imagine not being able to get your point across without resorting to hysterical hyperbole. Were you raised by two Mommies?
He went to the doctor and was reportedly diagnosed with a concussion. If his story is accurate, don't turn this into a McDonalds hot coffee thing where people mock someone who actually got hurt.
But was he kicked on purpose?
>In the lawsuit, Hunter claims he was hired for three days in April 2023 to play a dead parishioner in MaXXXine, the final horror flick in West's X trilogy. Per the filing, the actor was told to lie in the dirt for “several hours,” where he endured “ants and mosquitoes.” During the fourth take of a scene that involved Goth running and stepping over him, she nearly stepped on Hunter, prompting him to tell the second assistant director, who “warned” her to “be careful.”
>Hunter alleges that Goth then “intentionally kicked” him in the head during the next take.
>He claims that once the scene was completed, Goth confronted him in the bathroom, where she “taunted, mocked, and belittled” him, daring him to do anything about it. The next day, he says, his casting agency informed him that production did not want him back for his remaining two days. He also claims he was “banned” from the movie set.
>In terms of his injuries, Hunter said that on the day of the alleged kick, he felt lightheaded driving home and had to pull over twice. He experienced “head trauma symptoms,” including “loss of memory, confusion, and disorientation,” and eventually went to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with a concussion. He also alleged to having “bruises and red marks” on his head after the kick.
LMAO Mia is a locker-room bully.
Shia is rubbing off on her.
I wish mia goth would taunt and belittle me. Life isn’t fair.
>He claims that once the scene was completed, Goth confronted him in the bathroom, where she “taunted, mocked, and belittled” him, daring him to do anything about it.
He should have touched her boobs at that point. She can't justify why she was in the male bathroom
>He claims that once the scene was completed, Goth confronted him in the bathroom, where she “taunted, mocked, and belittled” him, daring him to do anything about it
Yeah that absolutely did not happen
that's actually the part that makes me go "yeah it's probably true"
wtf dont copy me!
Where you there? No? Then frick off!
I know this is a meme, but you nailed it. This conveniently happened in a bathroom, presumably where no one else was and threefold could not contradict his obvious bullshit
BELIEVE SURVIVORS
Yes i met Mia Goth in 2022 on a Walmart parking lot. She asked me for change but i didn't have any so i offered her a $20 Google card. She said she needed five bucks to get home. I insisted i didn't have any money until she said we could have some fun together. I went to the ATM and got $50. She gave me a handjob in the bathroom. I was really awful my dick felt itchy for the rest of the day that b***h even wash her hands.
wdym? this supports the theory that she would choose to do this in a bathroom where noone would see it more than the former
Ti, Mia, this isn't the fricking court room. Now frick off.
>jewlywood actress being a c**t?! IMPOSSIBLE!!
kek why are mutts like this?
kek this is the part I believe the most
You too! WTF copy cats on this board I swear!!!11
Frick you, you eyebrowless wannabe Harv fricktoy. Hope the jury sentences you to jail for attempted murder
Seems probable to me, most major female confrontations happen in the bathroom
God I wish that was me.
> the actor was told to lie in the dirt for “several hours,” where he endured “ants and mosquitoes.”
"Just lay in the dirt and don't move, we'll be back in a couple of hours to start shooting the scene"
He can't movie for purposes of continuity you idiot.
You can lie down twice, stupid
>take tap on the head
>BOY, DO I FEEL HEAD TRAUMA SYMPTOMS
Is this guy walking around with a cast and a neckbrace?
Poor homosexual. Hope he gets a massive payout
faking a concussion is a lot easier than you’d think, I did it once to cover my ass for sleeping in during a final. you just go to the doctor and act like a moron.
Giwtwm
Bros if a girl confronted me in a bathroom I would so totally r*pe her
Anyone else?
Dude. This is a Cinemaphile blue board, not your rape dungeon group meeting. Have manners.
>>He claims that once the scene was completed, Goth confronted him in the bathroom, where she “taunted, mocked, and belittled” him, daring him to do anything about it.
This is the part where I would proceed to rape her
That's the part where I ask her to go on
The tribe are never giving Hunter a part again.
Hunter won't win as his witnesses won't testify on his behalf.
Hunter is a gay moron gayet.
This. He should have whipped his wiener on her face, she probably would suck him being such a coke crazy bawd.
Actors are pathetic. They think they're more important than they are, when theyre overpaid glorified living toys.
When they confront you, just keep implying a blow job or hand job will do justice. And let her swath in the moronicness.
regardless of how this ends, this guy's hollywood carreer is over
I also struggle to imagine this happening. she has the face of someone who could do it, but it's still a reach imagining she followed him in the cesspool to trash talk
Why would a hollywood star go out of their way to confront some nobody in a bathroom?
Look at this b***h and tell she's not a psycho.
She might be, but that doesn't mean that the extra isn't making at least 80% of this shit up.
It's fun to make people feel helpless.
>>He claims that once the scene was completed, Goth confronted him in the bathroom, where she “taunted, mocked, and belittled” him, daring him to do anything about it. The next day, he says, his casting agency informed him that production did not want him back for his remaining two days. He also claims he was “banned” from the movie set.
>>In terms of his injuries, Hunter said that on the day of the alleged kick, he felt lightheaded driving home and had to pull over twice. He experienced “head trauma symptoms,” including “loss of memory, confusion, and disorientation,” and eventually went to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with a concussion. He also alleged to having “bruises and red marks” on his head after the kick.
I would have fricking laughed at him and told him to get out of my office.
If she confronted him in the bathroom talking shit, she definitely wanted to "raped". Incel has no backbone and le sues everyone himself. He had free pickings to coom in any of her holes
you're an idiot
>Goth confronted him in the bathroom, where she “taunted, mocked, and belittled” him, daring him to do anything about it
Well the Mc Donalds thing was the woman's fault really. Like maybe you should be more careful when holding hot liquids. I honest to god never seen anybody doping coffee on themselves.
The coffee was defective. If someone serves you a coffee that causes third degree burns, it's a faulty product.
still the lady's fault. you could buy a knife and trip while holding it onto the way back to your car and completely kill or blind yourself with it. should all knives be blunted and disassembled before sale incase an incompetent moron hurts themselves with it later?
>but it was too hot!
so what? regular temperature hot coffee isn't designed to be spilled on you either. it probably wouldn't require skin grafts but you could still get serious burns. i feel that any interaction with a product outside of its specific use-case should completely void your right to sue someone else for the consequences of your own actions. if she burned her throat drinking it, i might be more sympathetic.
You're reciting the urban myth version of the story.
The reality is that McDonald's (idk if it was just one specific franchised place or the whole chain) were serving the coffee at a dangerous temperature, to the point where the woman who accidentally spilt it on herself spent a week in hospital and required skin grafts. I don't know if you've ever spilt hot coffee on yourself, but while unpleasant you probably won't need medical intervention besides maybe some burn ointment. So you know that coffee was way, way, way too hot.
The lady tried to get McDonald's to settle by just paying her medical bills (approx. $20,000) but they refused. So she sued them, and got something like $640,000 when the jury found McDonald's to have been liable.
>The lady tried to get McDonald's to settle by just paying her medical bills
Kek, America everyone
careful, aqib
There is nothing wrong with serving coffee near boiling. Just don't spill it all over yourself like a dumbass lmao.
Yeah there is Black person, you can't fricking drink it
Even after the 30 seconds or so it takes to hand her the coffee, it will have cooled significantly. And if adding something to it, that cools it even more. Plenty of people start drinking hot beverages immediately.
>it will have cooled significantly
you've never had hot coffee ever. ask tarantino about it.
No talkie until i had my co- ACK!
Boiling hot coffee would not cool significantly you fricking moron.
coffee's main ingredient is water. when have you known water to cool/heat "significantly" in a very short period of time? read up on hydrogen bonds you homosexual.
Do you think she was drinking it underwater in the antarctic or something?
i think the usual temperature something becomes easy to drink is 60 Centigrade. Often people slurp if it's hotter to mix it with air, cooling it.
I imagine that they'll transfer the liquid is quickly and hot as possible because it's easy to cool something off but a cold coffee sucks.
You are underage or fricking moronic
iirc mcdonalds was found at fault because they deliberately made the coffee to hot to drink because they wanted to discourage people from asking for refills.
If the coffee is hot enough you'd have to wait until you were no longer on the premises to consume it.
I don't know if it matters from a legal standpoint but mcdonalds was deliberately heating coffee to a dangerous temperature to avoid spending a few shekels on refills
I spilled just-finished-boiling instant coffee on my bare arm, the whole fricking cup, and didn't need any treatment except a bandage when the blisters popped. How fricking hot was her coffee that she needed skin grafts? Was is a coffee-maker/nuclear cool down pool combo?
Well, the boiling point of water is 100 degrees celsius pretty much everywhere in the world.
But you're forgetting that this inceident happened in the US, which uses the fahrenheit scale, where the boiling point is 212 degrees.
That means that in the US you can heat up water to not only around 100 degrees before it vaporizes, but to 212 degrees. And 212 degrees can damage your skin much more severely than a mere 100 degrees can.
Not only this, apparently the "fix" that came out of the lawsuit was just to print "Contents may be hot" on the cup. That does nothing to change the temperature it's served at, so you can still get burned by nuclear coffee.
>he fell for the corporate damage control
>id like hot coffee please
>AHHHHH WTF WHY IS THE COFFEE HOT
That WAS a stupid lawsuit. 82C isnt even boiling.
An elderly woman gets coffee so hot that spilling it causes third degree burns. She asks McDonalds to pay for her medical expenses. They refuse. She sues them. Wins.
Not a stupid lawsuit.
>elderly woman orders coffee
>coffee is served at the temperature coffee is brewed and served at
>elderly woman removes lid from coffee cup while cradling the cup between her legs
>elderly woman spills coffee on herself
>elderly woman is wearing sweatpants that absorb the coffee and trap it against her skin instead of allowing it to roll off
It's called an accident. Sometimes accidents happen. This doesn't mean anyone is liable for it. McDonald's lost because they are a big corporation and nobody likes those.
> Sometimes accidents happen. This doesn't mean anyone is liable for it.
Sovereign citizen level of legal moronation. Incredible.
>herp derp 70 degrees and 120 degrees are both hot so I guess there's literally no difference
Bro the Mc Donalds employee handed her the coffee. If the temperature was to blame there would be hundreds of lawsuits like that one.
Why are you defending a mega corporation you fricking chud? You think they give a frick?
There were thousands of lawsuits for the exact same reason you dumb fricking shill. McDonald's reasoning for making absurdly hot coffee was that people would drink it so slowly so they wouldn't abuse the free refills.
82 degrees celcius is fricking 180 degrees fahrenheit LOL
>Celsius
gaggot, opinion discarded
Black person she got 3rd degree burns all over her pusy.
Cope. Studios are on the hook for on-set injuries.
gete raped. I'm sure it will just be an accident.
She stepped on him, he asked her not to do that then in a fit of rage at being spoken to by a 'pleb' she kicked him in the head on the next take.
Just wait, her lawyers will claim she was method acting at the time.
It'll be impossible to prove that she kicked him deliberately. This case will be thrown out in seconds
It's a film set. Cameras were rolling during it. I'm sure the extra wouldn't try to sue, knowing anyone can deny her intentions. They probably have it on tape. It's the Christian Bale Dark Knight situation all over where people remember how much of a prick most A list actors are .
Bale tantrum was in Terminator I think
>be stuntman on resident evil
>crew tells you everything is safe for stunt even though it isn't
>have your face pulled off, lose your arm and have spinal injuries
>receive no apology or compensation
also the american way
>Be cinematographer
>Alec Baldwin doesn't like you, but it's cool because frick him
>get shot in the face in broad daylight in front of hundreds of witnesses
>twice
>charges dropped
'Murica
as much as I hate homosexual baldwin, still wouldn't pass a guilty verdict if I was a juror
now the b***h in charge of weapons, easily hand her life in prison
I hear this often. And I can understand the thinking. After the army, though, I'm generally of the opinion that if you are handling a gun, doesn't matter what someone else said. Treat it as if it's loaded.
I think I finally understand why celebrities and others are so vehemently in favor of gun control - they assume that everyone else is as moronic and clueless as they are.
A film set isn't your army camp or a shooting range. Not having actors in charge of gun safety, but trained experts, is supposed to make it safer, not less safe. That's why holding actors accountable is counter-productive. You don't want every actor to fumble around with the weapon after the expert has given his okay.
>supposed to
This reads like a total cop out. In the army, we don't carry weapons. An armorer gives us our weapon. When we aren't at the range, we give it back. When we aren't on mission, we give it back.
If I get my weapon from the armorer, and pull the trigger without checking it, and accidentally discharge a weapon, guess who gets court mashalled? Sure as frick not the armorer.
>This isn't your army camp
This was so condescending, it made me dislike you in the extreme. A woman died as a direct result of Baldwin pointing a firearm at her and pulling the trigger - twice. But somehow, it's not his fault. Knob polishing fricks.
>When we aren't on mission, we give it back.
Yes, actors do the same when the shoot is done.
>If I get my weapon from the armorer, and pull the trigger without checking it, and accidentally discharge a weapon, guess who gets court mashalled?
That's because you aren't an actor in a secure environment, only shooting blanks the very most, you are a soldier during training, shooting actual bullets. That's a difference. Your amorer hands you a weapon that can actually kill with ease. That's why you need to handle it with care.
An on-set amorer on the other hand is supposed to make sure that, no matter what an actor does (short of loading bullets into the gun, which he's not allowed to, because, as mentioned, he's not even allowed to open it up and check), the weapon cannot be used to kill.
>This was so condescending
Sorry, but you are obviously a complete moron who doesn't get that film sets have safety rules of their own, which are way stricter than whatever you do with your guns, because you are trained to handle them and actors are not.
>Way stricter
Obviously not. Because as you yourself just said, only the armorers are expected to be responsible for gun safety, as opposed to EVERYONE on post. And a great many actors are highly trained on weapons safety, simply by virtue of being action stars. You are just making excuses for a murderer because you can't handle the idea of Jack Donaghy being a sociopathic murderous scumbag.
>Obviously not
Obviously yes. See
.
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/safety-topics/guns/
>Gun-related deaths from preventable, intentional, and undetermined causes totaled 48,830 in 2021, an increase of 8% from 45,222 deaths in 2020. Suicides account for 54% of deaths related to firearms, while 43% were homicides, and about 1% were preventable/accidental.
Around 1% of 48K. Let's just say 4000 accidental gun deaths per year in the US. That makes more than 11 per day. Outside of filmsets.
Meanwhile, on film sets, 43 deaths in three decades:
https://www.npr.org/2021/10/22/1048295916/props-gun-death-injuries-rust-movie-set-rare
And, yes, less guns are used on-set than in random situations (because in the US every moron can own them). But not to that same magnitude.
Ergo: Film sets are pretty damn safe when it comes to guns, compared to literally anywhere else.
You're dumb and bad at statistics. You forgot the obvious part where you compare how often people are on movie sets compared to when they're literally anywhere else.
>You forgot the obvious part where you compare how often people are on movie sets compared to when they're literally anywhere else.
No. See:
>And, yes, less guns are used on-set than in random situations (because in the US every moron can own them). But not to that same magnitude.
You are obviously too stupid to read. You definitely shouldn't be handling guns.
>43% were homicides
I wonder which race commits the most homicides?
>Yes, actors do the same when the shoot is done.
>Your amorer hands you a weapon
No wonder you keep strawmanning your arguments.
If you followed the case when it happened or at least read about it, you'll know the armorer wasn't involved in handing the gun over to Baldwin. She wasn't even on the set.
Baldwin was handed the gun by someone else. Not the armorer.
If you are the guy in charge of tightening the bolts that hold the truck wheels on and the truck wheels fall off not being at work that day is worse for you, not better.
Nah, anon. According to those /k/tards, it's the driver who's at fault then. At least whenever they don't like the driver because he made fun of Trump or something.
Oh, and another thing: If you think everyone being responsibe for his own weapon is safer than an expert being the sole responsible party, I encourage you to look up how many serious gun accidents (injuries and fatalities) happen on film sets, versus how many of those happen in environments where people check their guns themselves.
Oh, another thing: Way to put words in my mouth, c**t.
>Check the weapon when you receive it after it leaves your sight at least once
>Don't point it at people and pull the trigger in a fit of rage
>HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY EXPECT ACTORS TO BE EXPERTS ON GUN SAFETY!!!!????
Holy shit.
>Check the weapon when you receive it after it leaves your sight at least once
I've already told you that actors opening up their weapons to check makes things LESS safe. You want to minimize potential sources of tampering on set.
>Don't point it at people and pull the trigger in a fit of rage
Pointing guns at people is literally what actors are supposed to do in certain situations. Again, you show that you cannot even fathom a situation where a gun is not used as a fricking loaded weapon.
>>HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY EXPECT ACTORS TO BE EXPERTS ON GUN SAFETY!!!!????
You cannot. That's the point. You've probably trained with guns for years. That makes you an expert. It's your job afterall. But an actor's job is to act, not to train with guns. And most actors aren't gun-fanatic rednecks who spend all their free time shooting beer cans either.
>Pointing guns at people is literally what actors are supposed to do in certain situations
>in certain situations
which situation called for the gun to be aimed and fired while the camera wasn't even rolling?
Several situations call for guns to be aimed pre-shoot. Basically anything that's meant to set up the shot (which is, if I recall correctly, what they were doing when the whole incident happened), and sometimes dress rehearsals (though that's generally more of a theater thing).
Those do generally not require the trigger to be pulled, but you could justify an actor doing it anyway, instinctively, if he's already "in the role". Obviously, during set-up, the weapon used shouldn't be loaded at all, not even with blanks. Making sure that's the case is the armorer's job.
he pointed a loaded gun at a woman and pulled the trigger and killed her lmao, it's his fault and you're a bootlicking psychopath
>pointed a loaded gun
You're still not getting whose job it is to make sure the gun isn't loaded. Do you have some kind of intellectual deficit or something?
>whose job it is to make sure the gun isn't loaded.
the person holding the fricking gun. this is basic gun safety.
>the person holding the fricking gun
Nope. If it was, on-set gun accidents would be way more common.
Now, do you wanna read this whole exchange here again and then have another go at answering that question?
Its actually sag guidelines that yes, it is the person as well as the arnorer. Your expected to load and unload the gun in a presence of the armorer. Who wasnt there. If they arnt, you need to call sag for violations. Now baldwin might of not known, hes only been a sag member for
oh, 40 years
>Its actually sag guidelines that yes, it is the person as well as the arnorer.
No, it's not. And, again, it's not allowed on any set that an actor opens a gun to check.
>Your expected to load and unload the gun in a presence of the armorer.
Nope. No actor should ever LOAD a gun on set, you fricking braindead moron.
An actor is expected to trust the armorer. At most can ask him to check and make sure it's safe. NEVER will an actor be allowed to do that himself on set.
>/k/ logic on Cinemaphile
I can't fricking believe that I have explain every time you autists post this. That the rule doesn't apply when their rolling. Guns being pointed at people be it actors, stunt people, camera crew, happen all the fricking time.
The MAIN reason the DoP died is because the armorer is a fricking moron.
>all laws magically disappear when movie cameras are present
There are no laws about pointing guns as long as all parties are aware that it's not to be seen as a threat.
exactly
thanks for proving my point
what about shooting them? any laws about that, moron?
Strawman argument. Nobody is saying you shouldn't have experts on set. You should just have experts on top of actors being held to basic common sense standards.
he wasnt just the actor though, he was the Producer and he deliberately cheaped out on the armorer instead of hiring someone more expensive, thats negliglence
>he wasnt just the actor though, he was the Producer
See
.
Also, he was one of multiple producers, none of which have seen any legal consequences at this point. It's pretty clear this is about him as an actor.
>thats negliglence
Hiring the wrong people cannot ever be negligence. At the very most it is incompetence. Also, producers do not usually hire every staff member personally. So all of that is a very long shot (pun might be intended).
The entire union staff crown walked off set due to unsafe work conditions prior. That includes Baldwin and AD shooting cans in the back for fun. AD was handling the weapon at the time, he handed it to Baldwin. The chick wasn't even on set for two days at the time.
>The chick wasn't even on set for two days at the time.
Which makes her liable. She was required to be there.
It makes every single one of them a liability, don't forget that Baldwin was a producer and in charge of that armourer c**t.
An investigation of Baldwin's role as a producer is a different matter. That's definitely something that should have been done, but either wasn't done at all or yielded no signs of wrongdoing on his part. There was no statement by the authorities regarding that issue.
But claiming that actors should override armorers in cases of gun safety, and that that would make things safer, is astoundlingly stupid.
Once that gun is in your hands its your responsibility and no one else's. You don't check if a gun is loaded by shooting your co worker.
>Once that gun is in your hands its your responsibility and no one else's.
That's not how film sets work.
Responsibility gets centralized to experts, not spread across everyone on set. Because its safer that way.
Well that sounds dumb as frick and could only happen in California. 12 year Olds in the Midwest can exercise better gun control.
>that sounds dumb as frick
No. It's the reason gun accidents on film sets are extremely rare. Unlike anywhere else where your average uneducated American citizen is responsible.
Ah I see now. You're a homosexual european. Opinion discarded.
But that's wrong little niglet.
It isn't, /misc/tard.
Hence why the moronic district attorney (who had a such a hateboner for Baldwin and so much wanted a high-profile case that the she let the assistant director get away scott-free) eventually had to drop all charges against the actor.
Wow a rich Hollywood actor got the charges to drop. What a shocker. Doesn't change the fact that he and he alone was responsible for the firearm he shot that lady with. "I didn't know it was loaded, that person over there checked it for me." Is not a defence.
>a rich Hollywood actor got the charges to drop.
The charges were dropped because they were bogus. The district attorney made a complete fool of herself, even trying to apply a law that only had been introduced after the fact, and letting the assistant director (who was the person handling the gun in the case) off with a warning in exchange for a witness statement against Baldwin. There simply was no case, and that woman tried to build one out of nothing nonetheless, probably in pursuit of her own five minutes in the spotlight.
that's wrong
everyone is responsible. definitely the experts but also whoever is handling it.
otherwise you have a single point of failure.
The experts cant be everywhere at once so while the assume some responsibility, ultimately the person holding the gun is responsible, and if they can't assume that responsibility, they shouldn't touch the gun.
>otherwise you have a single point of failure.
No. You have a single point of risk. The expert.
Once you let actors tamper with guns, the actual gun expert on set cannot guarantee safety anymore. It's the same for stunt coordinators, and even for electricians. You have a very small circle of people who have all the responsibility. Because the moment you spread resposibility, people will start messing up everywhere. This is common practice because it's common sense. Sorry that you're too moronic to understand that.
>The experts cant be everywhere at once
They don't need to be. There's usually not more than one scene shot at once, and the guns are kept locked away unless they are needed for a scene. An amorer just needs to make sure that A) the gun is safe when he hands it out and B) no one tampers with it afterwards (like opening it to check for bullets, because an actor who does that could in theory INSERT bullets).
>the moment you spread resposibility, people will start messing up everywhere.
no, the moment you tell people "do whatever. that one guy over there is responsible for any problems" is when people start messing up everywhere.
it doesn't matter who you put in charge, you never get to relinquish all accountability.
if you pick up a gun, you will be partially accountable, regardless of who you hire as your catchall scapegoat.
This is how it works everywhere, with everything.
It's why in corporations they have safety officers, but also make it clear to everyone that "safety is everyone's job"
You haven't said anything particularly bright so I assume you're being stupid to piss me off.
So anyway, this post is for anyone unfortunate enough to take you seriously.
Remember: you can still be held accountable. Just because there is an "expert", you don't get to act like a sperg and put others at risk.
>no, the moment you tell people "do whatever. that one guy over there is responsible for any problems" is when people start messing up everywhere.
You're being wilfully stupid. In the current system, there is NO WAY for the actor messing up. The only person who can mess up is the armorer. And that one person is generally expected to be professional and responsible.
In your proposed system, the gun expert has no way to make sure that guns are safe, because the fricking actors, laymen, can now mess shit up.
You're one of those Trumpists who doesn't like Baldwin, aren't you? Try looking at the situation without any actor's face attached to it, please. Maybe that will allow you to see reason.
anyone believing this idiot, you do so at your own peril
obviously trust and listen to safety experts, but safety is everyone's job.
believing otherwise will get you in easily avoidable trouble
>believing otherwise will get you in easily avoidable trouble
All charges against Baldwin were dropped, /misc/tard.
The armorer is still in hot water. And so would you be very quickly, were you the armorer on any filmset.
how is the fricking actor going to "mess up" an unloaded gun, you stupid homosexual?
By loading it. That's why no one is allowed to open it other than the amorer.
this is manifestly and obviously true
you can't make something foolproof because fools are too ingenious.
if you tell someone they bear no responsibility they are likely to behave recklessly.
>you can't make something foolproof because fools are too ingenious.
If you do not load a weapon and do not allow it to be loaded, it is foolproof. Explain to me how anyone is going to shoot anyone else with an unloaded weapon.
he took the orphaned kids to Dennys, he's a national hero
Qrd?
Not him but a stunt woman was badly injured and eventual lost her arm. Stunt people get fricked ove mighty.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/stunt-workers-fury-over-lord-of-the-rings-injuries/2IGAURQ4XGCS3FCBB2IGUI4WVU/
You take everything up the ass without complain, from people "above you". The European way
>break every bone in your body as an extra
>smoke joint for pain
>go to jail
China everyone
Why do you defend people richer then you?
;D
>>as if every single aspect of israelitellywood shouldnt be sued over and over into oblivion
Sue them for something they actually did then.
Like flooding the market with terrible capeshit. Or casting Zendaya in everything. Or allowing Netflix to destroy television.
what part of deliberately kicking him in the head dont you understand moron.
Probably the part where "deliberately" is only a claim from an extra, who frankly seems a bit too ambitious in his claims overall.
Even if he threw himself head first on her foot that's based. FRICK celebs
Don't they keep the tapes from these takes? Wouldn't be easy to see if she did it on purpose?
bump
It was mysteriously deleted and lost.
It doesn’t matter if she kicked him in the head.
Mia Goth, me so dark and edgy
where are her eyebrows
in my tummy
i ate them
i believe him
Believe all men, stop victim shaming.
#MeToo
X and Pearl are not even good movies
They are literal kino
No Horror is Kino. The closest it comes is the Shining.
Horror is just entertainment for people who want simplicity. Sex, death. Screaming. Running. It's base instinct for base people.
No action is kino. Action is just entertainment for people who want simplicity. Explosions, guns, yelling, swearing. It's base instinct for base people.
You can do this shit with any genre
You are correct. But Action is for men. Action is about being a hunter and killing the beast, Horror is about being attacked by a bear while fetching berries.
Look guys, we got ourselves NERD over here
Unapologetically yes.
Not even close
Pearl was okay but X was trash. Cautiously optimistic about MaXXXine.
both were absolute shit
legit question.
are X and Pearl good kinos?
X is silly popcorn horror but I found it fun. Pearl was kino-light.
i'm thinking on waiting on MaXXXine to marathon them all and do a triple featurette
X stinks. Pearl is a good time. She's literally me.
Pearl is kino and the character is top 5 greatest female villains of all time.
X is complete trash.
Pearl is good
X is trash
Unwatchable shit.
but X made me cum
Pearl was cringe and kino
Didn't RDJ did something like that in the Sherlock movie. It was a pretty funny story.
З
Pearl good
X mediocre, but still enjoyable if you like horrors
Who thinks she's guilty?
What about after remembering she's married to Shia LeBeouf?
do I think the spoiled hollywood princess is guilty of acting like a spoiled hollywood princess? gosh, I'll have to think about that.
>Who thinks she's guilty?
I do. Typical Prima Donna behavior.
its "Pre-Modonna", not your cousin Donna, stupid
You're moronic and your joke is so bad Amy Shumer wouldn't use it.
anyone with an iq over 80 knows she's guilty. people here saying otherwise are obvioisly trolling and shitposting. read the room
What a homosexual. I would give my left arm to get kicked by Mia fricking Goth
>Mia fricking Goth
So a nobody
Why are untalented people always the biggest c**ts?
I don't know. Why are you?
Nepotism
god I wish Mia goth would kick me in the balls and head and laugh and mock me
that's boring, unless she took a shit on your chest next
god as she filmed it and blackmailed me to be her personal slave for her pwhoaaaaar
>Horror is just entertainment for people who want simplicity. Sex, death. Screaming. Running. It's base instinct for base people.
I look like that, say that, and I'm also 2 dimensional and monochromatic. my life is an eternal nightmare. this "web site" is the only way I can connect with the "real world" of 3 dimensions and I use it to lash out rage and pain at my hopeless existence.
I honestly can't tell if people here are joking or being serious
>He doesn't want Mia Goth to kick him
homosexual
>He wants to subvert the natural order and be dominated by a woman
You are unironically a hyper estrogenized homosexual who desires to be in the position of a woman.
>during filming something happened and after filming I decided to cash in on it after I'd talked with enough people about it
>You are correct. But Action is for men. Action is about being a hunter and killing the beast, Horror is about being attacked by a bear while fetching berries.
hey, nice selfie, butthole
I'm okay with you disagreeing with me because you like AI Pictures.
She's gorgeous
Frick her
Will do
Amazing voice
Amazing acting
Amazing unique beauty
She is literally perfect
No eyebrows, though.
>No eyebrows, though.
not him but it works for me.
Brazilian mix my friend
Being born in Brazil to a British Brazillian consulate doesn't make you a Brazillian mix, dumbass.
And her mom was what? British too?
haha, imagine her cucking you with a tall and chiseled Black guy
mutt's law
Damn she ugly
>hey, nice selfie, butthole
>I'm okay with you disagreeing with me because you like AI Pictures.
is just entertainment for people who want simplicity. Sex, death. Screaming. Running. It's base instinct for base people.
>The extra was lying on the ground covered in fake blood pretending to be dead
Sounds like it's his own damn fault. Why is he pretending to be dead if he doesn't want people to step on him?
I thought that taking her clothes off is all that this talentless prostitute can do when filming but apparently she can be violent too.
After reading this, I've concluded that I haven't kicked enough people in the head in my life.
common law is so fricking moronic
*stomps your head*
Her feet.
My face.
NOW
Haha imagine there was a scene where she's barefoot and has to step on your face and then run away. Wouldn't that be hilarious haha
GODAMN, stomp on me, my queen!!!
>MaXXXine
porn?
I think the film is supposed to be about her pornstar career after surviving X where she goes on a murderous rampage because reasons. Can't wait to see Mia Goth fail to act once again when she starts screaming about how everyone sucks but her (again)
Are those two films connected to Pearl?
RDJ did something similar on the set of Sherlock Holmes thinking it was a dummy
Guy was British though so didn't sue him or anything
Recounts it on Graham Norton
RDJ also broke Halle Berry's arm in the movie Gothika. Teehee, he just a silly guy.
>i'm a hideous goblin but i want to make myself more hideous
>i know i'll shave off my eyebrows
modern women everyone
she's beautiful
good moring sirs
I'm white but I live in South America because I appreciate that latinas are the most beautiful women on the planet and Mia Goth is one of them
>i'm white
>in south america
doubt.jpg
There are plenty of whites here, although not so much where I live, in Paraguay
Mia is a lovely milky Brazilian even without eyebrows
>Kicked by a girl
>Concussion
How much of a complete fricking vegana was this guy?
She was wearing boots Ya fkin moron
>act like a jerk
>popularity on Cinemaphile skyrockets
???
I have experience with dead eye girls like this
completely empty, bpd, narcissism etc. basically irl demons
Eyes like runny poo.
what the frick is her problem?!
Iceman bros...
>a man denied his turret shield
I'm still mad at her for ruining this otherwise-kino
t. Jameseyyyyy
That crazy c**t was the best thing about it.
>The plaintiff alleges that Goth stepped on his testicles with high heel boots and whispered in his ear "now frick my butthole like a good little homosexual." He is seeking punitive damages.
How the hell is he going to prove she kicked him deliberately and not accidentally? Does he have footage?
well presumably there were multiple eyewitnesses since it's a film set
I don't think anyone's allowed to record things on movie sets. She'll walk..
No but someone has the footage, which his lawyers will obtain through the discovery.
>kicked him
>footage
Oh, I see what you did there!
I wouldn't have sued anybody. I would have paid Mia Goth to kick me, and that's what no one did.
It should have been me
Where are her eyebrows?
Same place "her" balls are.
They're probably super light colour. My dad and sister have something similar happen but my sister pencils her's in. Whenever she doesn't I ask her that same question.
X was one of the most disappointing horror movies in recent years
Imagine she kicks you in the head and makes that face hnng curb stomp me mia
Midge!?
>shills defending mcdonald's... again
Time to bust out old reliable
>Oy vey, stupid old woman! Why would you be so careless with the coffee we served to you at temperatures hot enough to cause third-degree burns? Why don't you just buy your own new skin instead of kvetching about it so much?
>Ach! These schmucks will be running us out of business if we have to pay nearly a percentage point of our hourly income for every pointless life-threatening injury we could have easily prevented, had we complied with government warnings!
Heres some of Photos that the shills will ignore.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/426890391/#426919603
>The extra was lying
case closed then ?
Never got this mid b***h's appeal
She's a femcel just like me.
This is why film contracts should include waivers
She went full Thomas Gibson. You never go full Thomas Gibson.
Pearl is so kind
Ugly looking b***h
homosexual
American style litigation culture is weird
Definitely made for each other
She looks neanderthal
>that one goy standing up for Ronald
jesus
I hope she has to pay 100k.
Why brazilian girls are so hot, fellas?