I know they don’t actually care about historical record so I’ve just dropped to the point of saying ‘I don’t give a frick.’ Oddly they don’t seem to have an actual response to that.
>In a conscious effort to emulate the American South, the Americo-Liberian settlers adopted clothing such as hoop skirts and tailcoats, and excluded natives from economic opportunities, including creating plantations on which natives were forced to work as slaves.
they freed their slaves and gave them rights. The freed slaves and their ancestors were then manipulated by agitators against the country and used to erode it from within, putting the agitators in power whereupon their incompetence destroyed the country.
the civilizations are still around. Politics change and rulers die, but society as a whole just keeps on truckin.
they freed their slaves and gave them rights. The freed slaves and their ancestors were then manipulated by agitators against the country and used to erode it from within, putting the agitators in power whereupon their incompetence destroyed the country.
It doesn't matter if it was built on slavery.
White people still made it possible with planning and knowledge from centuries of brutal oppression and war with eachother far worse than anything you could ever know. You couldn't do something useful in the thousands of years you've existed in your current lineages.
White people didn't enslave you, they made you worth a damn.
I swear, the arrogance of minorities to pretend like "DUH, AXCHUALLY WE MADE DA WEST AND MATHS N SMART STUFF N SHIET WE DA IMPORTANT WUNZ"
fricking stop. You're here because we gave you the choice. You CHOSE to stay, you have nobody but yourselves to blame. Frickers.
homies don't want to acknowledge that Africa was built on slavery. So many people think whitey went over to Africa specifically to enslave them, when in reality they went over there to establish trade and the Africans offered slaves in exchange for goods like guns and spices.
True, they just stopped in the middle of the ocean
I’m just glad this show disproves any rumor that owl house got cancelled for being too gay when the new Proud Family is ten times gayer and more political than owl house ever was.
Also, LaCienega not being part of the group musical act tells me she’s a slave supporter too.
I’m just glad this show disproves any rumor that owl house got cancelled for being too gay when the new Proud Family is ten times gayer and more political than owl house ever was.
Also, LaCienega not being part of the group musical act tells me she’s a slave supporter too.
>uses technology invented by whiteys to b***h about whypipo
I really don't understand black anericans. Nnative americans barely complain on the same magnitudes as blacks. why?
>uses technology invented by whiteys
You didn't read The Art of War? It is a legitimate strategy to use the means of your enemy (or competition outside of war) to win.
Nobody really cares about anything, it's all grifting and feeling smug about how woke/based you are in your twitter clique. Also native americans don't take out loans to buy shoes so they aren't a target audience.
Is everyone below a specific melanin amount collectively responsible for slavery or not?
Oh I see, youre a neolib.
Nice, no other argument needed. You are evil and insane.
>youre a neolib
Wrong again.
Here's an idea: instead of trying to tar your opponent with the worst brush you have on hand, try responding to the points being made, however crude they may be.
>Is everyone below a specific melanin amount collectively responsible for slavery or not
Is everyone pertaining a certain religion responsible for everything bad that happened?
Their effectiveness as farming equipment was questionable at best, and was only profitable in very particular industries such as pre-industrial cotton, sugar cane, and tobacco production. The American South and Indian Raj protested the abolition of slavery because they didn't yet have the infrastructure to fully industrialize.
Even then, the civil war wasn't even about the abolition of slavery - it was about the act of secession and state v federal power, which was partially fueled by the federal government and free states not wanting to extend slavery into the west. Abolition wasn't a real fear.
The only way it could have happened would be with a 3/4th Federal majority vote on a constitutional amendment, which wasn't possible. Most of the free states and the new western states were hard line segregationist, and were trying to ship Black people to Liberia, or otherwise to expell them from the north. There was also mass support for the Corwin Amendment by northern free states and Union slave state before the war, which made federal abolition illegal outside of the territories.
That's why one reason why alot of Confederates denied fighting for slavery. The war was over a state's right to self rule, the right of secession, and federalism vs antifederalism, not slavery per se.
Not per se, no, but the South wasn't industrialized enough to financially weather the abolition of slavery either. Many saw it as a deliberate attempt on behalf of the North to immiserate the South and force dependence, but that's all wrapped up in that anti-fed thing you mentioned.
But even then, that had nothing to do with slavery. The issue of the industrial north and the agricultural south goes back to the nullifaction crisis, and the Walker tariff (Georgia even mentions multiple tariffs in its ordinance of secession document). The tariffs put a massive tax on imported goods, including machinery. Southern cotton interested wanted industrialisation for their own respective states, but the north wasn't going to allow competition. So to enrich themselves while keeping southern states under their political thumb, they more or less banned the importation of machinery (Britian being the main source of the textile industrial machinery until after WWI), and ensured cotton would fuel northern textile mills.
In protest, John C. Calhoun brought up the issue of secession from the Union to ensure a better future for South Carolina. Andrew Jackson said that if they attempted secession, he would do worse to South Carolina than he did the Cherokee and Chickasaw.
I don't know about the israelite statistics, but 0.35% is absolutely not correct.
If you're counting only the states that condoned slavery and excluded the minority population, then over 5% of white people in Southern states directly owned slaves. If you include their families, the people that benefited from that ownership, then over 30% of of the Southern white population was part of a unit that owned slaves.
So if you took the 30% and somehow dropped it to 0.35%, then your ethnic israelites figure is clearly a fabrication.
>Chinese railroad workers who exploded every other day watching people who can't even speak their own language claim they built and invented everything
>"Muh black slavery built the US" >like 95% of slaves worked in agriculture in the South >by the time the Civil War happened slavery was unprofitable >the Civil War and the objective failure of Reconstruction basically annihilated most of the businesses and plantations black slaves had a hand in >the US Industrial Revolution only came into full swing after the Civil War, which is when the US really began to assert itself in international business and economics
> the episode where Penny went back to Jim Crow era >The Muslim episode >The Black League episode >The Kawzaa episode >The MLK episode >Black History month episode
You blind homie
>Kwanzaa
Are you really willing to say that shit isn't embarrassing
Nobody cares if a black creator put stuff about his own race in his own works. That's not what woke means, it means whining about how he depicted the Asian triplets because they hate honest expression.
The role many minimum wage workers play in society is not meaningfully different from slaves. The technology is different, the wealth and the times, but not the role. I was saying this before woke politics became a big thing and they have to settle for shitty alternatives to My Views, because my views are Christian. I believe Jesus when he said the "poor will always be with you", but the condition of the slave equivalents can be improved perpetually
They also missed out on many of my cartooning ideas, they could have learned how to make the proud family better and truly good but they learn how to make it worse instead. "Loud and prideful" as the title says. What they get for rejecting me back in the late 00s when I just wanted to improve the world. The pathetic consequences of that decision are written all over their cartoons, and I love explaining how much their cartoons suck
But consider this: Your a homosexual AND the show is shit.
Ahh sweet another /misc/ thread disguised on Cinemaphile
Im starting to believe the other anon in another thread with the HP hat that this is just bot generated outrage at this point. This is a special kind of poe's law hell we're in.
Lmao hilarious. You're just reinforcing how pathetic the industry side is
But consider this: Your a homosexual AND the show is shit.
[...]
Im starting to believe the other anon in another thread with the HP hat that this is just bot generated outrage at this point. This is a special kind of poe's law hell we're in.
Apparently you think this image is supposed to impress because that's what you say in the text, nobody can tell from the drawings.
Your spastic outrage is not going to protect calarts toons from meaningful criticism which people can see the meaning of regardless of what you do.
Black person no one wants to see your fricking pigslop art, people can hate calarts style and shitty shows and can say that you are a talentless homosexual that gets mogged by litteral /beg/ tier autists fricking around.
If you're going to talk about politics, talk about something important, like how corporations spend $300m a year busting unions so they don't have to pay you more than $7.25/hr.
im 50/50 on unions. On one hand? Can be important for protecting employees rights and making sure everyone is owed there due. On the other? It can be a gargantuan clusterfrick of 'special privileges' and 'looking the other way if the money is right' along with getting press-ganged into a union that could be shit-teir gaygatory. You just cant win, still a very important graph to consider.
If you're going to talk about politics, talk about something important, like how corporations spend $300m a year busting unions so they don't have to pay you more than $7.25/hr.
GROOMER ALERT GROOMER ALERT! lmao
The shills are getting really frantic
Black person no one wants to see your fricking pigslop art, people can hate calarts style and shitty shows and can say that you are a talentless homosexual that gets mogged by litteral /beg/ tier autists fricking around.
[...]
im 50/50 on unions. On one hand? Can be important for protecting employees rights and making sure everyone is owed there due. On the other? It can be a gargantuan clusterfrick of 'special privileges' and 'looking the other way if the money is right' along with getting press-ganged into a union that could be shit-teir gaygatory. You just cant win, still a very important graph to consider.
You can't fricking write opinions on artwork into existence. The industry philosophy of the importance of "writing" has brought idiots like you into animation communities. You're not a beginner, you don't have the soul of an artist or a general creative. All you're going to do is watch the industry crumble apart >im 50/50 on unions
And you proved my haters spend their time grooming about shit like marxism when they're not busy hating me, so that is screenshotted
seeing the KKK and burning crosses in a Disney cartoon for children is wild as frick honestly
That was already in the cartoons I grew up with. I thought you were talking about the original Proud Family
You say this nonsense about rape when my posts get really good, because you're saying that they "violate" your manchild soul. You hope that I will give up on making good posts with that obscene response
By beyond help you mean beyond being able to be groomed and become a part of the industry hivemind. That is not help
To be fair, Proud Family always had the social commentary in it. The episode where Penny goes back to racial segregation times, That one episode with the Muslim family, etc.
Proud Family is one of the shows that always had social commentary in some way or another even back in the day.
There was executive mandated nonsense back then too, it just wasn't extreme and ideological like these days. Cartoons had to have educational content and stuff
And it was part of a context in the 00s and late '90s when people felt like racism was becoming a thing of the past instead of a thing to constantly fight about
BTW, last commenter, I want to return to that time you idiot not keep fighting
By you being beyond help, i meant a child rapist using the word groomer to describe wage inequality.
It would be funny, but i think youre like a 30 year old man, so it's actually really sad.
You're psychologically breaking up into spewing word salad. The sort of talent looking to break into animation these days and their psychological stamina
You will never be a showrunner.
I don't want to be one
Yeah, i think being bullied on Cinemaphile throughout his 20's broke his brain. Now we just wait for his suicide
What pathetic hopes, saved for later. What you're going to wait for is me continuing to demolish the industry as I already have, its misfortunes come in part from my efforts.
Posting another comparison image since the first one made your brains go Haywire
>"You can't fricking write opinions on artwork into existence" >"Calarts is bad btw, heres my supirior art against there shitty art
lol
lmao
Also I just did, your art is shit and everyone agrees. >"you don't have the soul of an artist or a general creative"
If what you have is considered 'soul' then im frickin glad I dont got what you have. >'I dont understand unions!'
Glad we agree.
Is he really 30? holy kek I thought he was a moronic zoomer this whole time
>mfw im around the same age
How can one 30 YO boomer get this fricking buck broken?
this thread is worst than usual, please delete this shit mods
the newbies probably an heroed already at this point.
>That was already in the cartoons I grew up with. I thought you were talking about the original Proud Family
What cartoons were you watching that had the KKK and burning crosses in them?
>Raise minimum wage >Causes inflation because all you did is devalue the currency >Union goes bust because no matter how many beaners it gets via agencies the money is worth less.
It's moronic because a 200% rise in """productivity""" means that 90% of your job is now automated, and are required to put in less effort than ever before, not that anyone is working 200% harder.
Minimum wage increases have trivial effects on inflation
Some claim to worry that raising the minimum wage might exacerbate our current inflation problem. This is not a serious concern. Consider the Raise the Wage Act, which would raise the minimum wage to $15 in five steps by 2027 and would be indexed to growth in median wages thereafter. If every penny of this higher minimum wage fed directly into higher prices—that is, none of it was financed by higher productivity or lower profits—the move to $15 would create a one-time step-increase in the overall price level of less than 0.5%. Spread over five years, this implies an average boost to inflation of less than 0.1% per year, after which it would fade to near-zero. This is completely trivial. Over the past two years, inflation has run at a rate about 100 times faster than this.
The math on this is relatively straightforward. As part of our analysis of previous versions of the Raise the Wage Act (and other minimum wage increases), we estimate the increase in the total wage bill generated by the higher minimum wage. That is, we multiply the number of workers affected by raising the minimum wage from its current level to $15 and then we estimate the average increase in wages they receive. This includes an estimate of “spillover” effects on workers who earn a bit above the new value of the minimum wage, and we assume no job loss stemming from these increases—both of which make our estimate of the effect on the total wage bill larger than it would be otherwise.
>The Math of this is relatively straightforward >Doesn't actually show any calculations at all about how this would impact anything at all.
You didn't even explain where the 0.5% price increase would come from. Arbitrary changes to the Minimum wage do absolutely nothing to actually increase the spending power of people.
Tell me, where will the costs offsetting this wage increase come from? Oh right, higher end costs or job losses.
"B-But we calculated it trust us" is a fricking shitty argument.
>The dependent variable in this study is the change in the log of food away from home
CPI (FAFH CPI), a price index generated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for select U.S.
metropolitan areas.
So the entire study you are citing literally only uses one Government sourced group of statistics which is extremely small in terms of actual economic impact, and in fact the entire argument the paper makes hinges on using the CPI instead of using other metrics.
The CPI is literally worthless when measuring inflation, especially when we're not talking about the cost of food only.
Cost of food =/= the level of inflation you literal socialist mongoloid.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Oh, and for the record, the CPI is what Joe Biden keeps quoting to say we're not in a recession and inflation isn't so bad.
1 year ago
Anonymous
CPI IS HOW INFLATION IS MEASURED YOU ABSOLUTE FRICKING IDIOT.
1 year ago
Anonymous
The CPI is basically an arbitrary number generated by the fricking Government using an absolutely tiny slice of consumer goods.
The CPI doesn't cover how local price changes work and don't even fricking interact with the major mechanic of inflation, AKA the buying power of the currency going down.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>CPI is how inflation is measured
It's also grossly inaccurate and if you actually looked up how it is calculated you'd know why.
1 year ago
Anonymous
You sound like the kind of person who thinks Inflation is rising costs and not decreasing purchasing power.
The CPI is based entirely on the goods people PURCHASE, and people usually begin purchasing less affordable things when hit with economic downturns like a recession, impacting the CPI to lower much slower than the actual costs.
One example is energy bills, Which is more accurate, the directly calculated rise in energy costs by the energy companies which is around 30% right now, or the CPI saying it rose by 0.8%?
Yes because some random loser spouting nonsense has only become a problem now and never before in human civilization. Truly that's what dystopian writers were warning us about, dumbass opinions from strangers we can ignore.
What else do you expect. What do you think the Black Community would do in the US if they found out they were at best equipment for ultimately short term very narrow economic growth for an area of the US?
To be fair, Proud Family always had the social commentary in it. The episode where Penny goes back to racial segregation times, That one episode with the Muslim family, etc.
Proud Family is one of the shows that always had social commentary in some way or another even back in the day.
Because dishonest c**tshits revel in the realm of unfalsifiable moral unquestionability, and will bend language and turn the world upside-down to stay on top of that illusory moral pyramid.
That is why you think they're evil.
>YOU DON'T LIKE MY SOLUTIONS, SO YOU JUST WANT PEOPLE DEADEADEADEADEAD >the frick is wrong with you? >UMMMMMMMMMMM THE FRICK IS WRONG WITH YOU THAT YOU CAN'T JUST JERK OFF TO SNUFF FILMS IN YOUR OWN HOME AND HAVE TO SHOW YOUR SICK DEATH FETISH OFF TO THE PUBLIC >what in the--- >ALSO YOU'RE RACIST >Why are you--- >HEY! THIS FRICKER GETS OFF TO PEOPLE DYING! SOMEONE MAKE HIS WET DREAM COME TRUE AND KILL HIM IN REAL LIFE!
Yes, "YOU'RE LITERALLY KILLING PEOPLE IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ME" is the telltale sign that whatever someone things they were fighting for is inconsequential in relation to their punch-drunk bloodlust, because it's not a long trip from that to "I HAVE THE RIGHT TO HURT YOU ON SPEC THAT YOU'RE A DIRTY WRONGTHINKER."
1 year ago
Anonymous
>wrong guy
No, you defend guy, who is a child rapist.
1 year ago
Anonymous
This isn't an accusation of wrongthink, it's an actual reflection of conservative actions.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I'm sure you believe that, and that's why I'm worried, because I know you're not the only one.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Well considering how you had a meltdown over someone showing you the rising wage disparity, I'd say you're genuinely evil.
I'll pray for you anon.
Obvious projection of wanting me to die, as someone who came into the animation community a poor person who just wanted to draw some cartoons. Groomer
ok pedophile
You mean a literal child lover, as you have literally said before. Y'know, like "Black person lover"
Cartoons should be made for the benefit of children and you can spew all the words you want but this simple truth remains
Minimum wage increases have trivial effects on inflation
Some claim to worry that raising the minimum wage might exacerbate our current inflation problem. This is not a serious concern. Consider the Raise the Wage Act, which would raise the minimum wage to $15 in five steps by 2027 and would be indexed to growth in median wages thereafter. If every penny of this higher minimum wage fed directly into higher prices—that is, none of it was financed by higher productivity or lower profits—the move to $15 would create a one-time step-increase in the overall price level of less than 0.5%. Spread over five years, this implies an average boost to inflation of less than 0.1% per year, after which it would fade to near-zero. This is completely trivial. Over the past two years, inflation has run at a rate about 100 times faster than this.
The math on this is relatively straightforward. As part of our analysis of previous versions of the Raise the Wage Act (and other minimum wage increases), we estimate the increase in the total wage bill generated by the higher minimum wage. That is, we multiply the number of workers affected by raising the minimum wage from its current level to $15 and then we estimate the average increase in wages they receive. This includes an estimate of “spillover” effects on workers who earn a bit above the new value of the minimum wage, and we assume no job loss stemming from these increases—both of which make our estimate of the effect on the total wage bill larger than it would be otherwise.
How about discussing fricking cartoons
Y'all don't even want to discuss the proud family, it's just a "platform" for politics
>LOOK! CHART!
Okay. And? >ZOMFG ARE YOU STUPID OR SOMETHING?
Yes. Please explain your argument as if I am. >UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM IT'S NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE YOU
Of course it's not...
>wrong guy
No, you defend guy, who is a child rapist.
No, I'm anti-marxist.
Since marxists support everything evil, that mean I support everything that's good.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>t. doesn't know anything about history
By definition, you're a Nazi, but im actually proud of you for accepting that you'll always be loser.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>t. marxist
1 year ago
Anonymous
Sure kid, now do me a favor and look up thr literacy rate between cuba and florida
Id say the commies are kicking your ass at education, decucktis
1 year ago
Anonymous
Did you really think that was gonna convince him?
>coleectivist
TL: Its okay if i dont do anything with my life since i can always leech off others because a trait I share with them
Who are you arguing with?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Cuba, the place where everyone is fleeing from due to communism, and then voting Republican because they don't want more communism?
1 year ago
Anonymous
First start by teaching an honest history of capitalism, including the coal wars, homestead massacre, triangle shirtwaist factory fire...
1 year ago
Anonymous
not start, but do so concordantly, commie.
1 year ago
Anonymous
He just said he's anti-socialist, how can he be a Nazi (national socialist)?
1 year ago
sage
How can you make this argument unironically when Fascism [Franco's Spain and Portugal, notably] have far better success rates then your entire ideology?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Commies always btfo the nazis, so i can understand why you're eternally seething about them lmao
1 year ago
Anonymous
Commies always btfo the nazis, so i can understand why you're eternally seething about them lmao
>This country was built on slavery
>THIS country
I think they all were, sweaty.
I know they don’t actually care about historical record so I’ve just dropped to the point of saying ‘I don’t give a frick.’ Oddly they don’t seem to have an actual response to that.
>sweaty
Come on, I just had a shower
Not all countries are equally old.
name one country or nation that never had slavery
Liberia
>In a conscious effort to emulate the American South, the Americo-Liberian settlers adopted clothing such as hoop skirts and tailcoats, and excluded natives from economic opportunities, including creating plantations on which natives were forced to work as slaves.
lol
lmao, even
>verification not required
quite literally every successful civilization practiced slavery lol
If they were so successful how come they're not around anymore?
they freed their slaves and gave them rights. The freed slaves and their ancestors were then manipulated by agitators against the country and used to erode it from within, putting the agitators in power whereupon their incompetence destroyed the country.
the civilizations are still around. Politics change and rulers die, but society as a whole just keeps on truckin.
Conservative horse shit.
>nb4 "muh strong men create weak coffee. Week coffee creates soft women. Soft women...
Not that Anon, but why exactly do you think when an Empire gets so big, with so many conflicting ethnic and cultural groups is implodes?
We're seeing that right now.
Well if other countries did it, that means it's okay.
Infallible logic.
Literally nobody alive today (who doesn't live in Libya or Qatar) is affected by slavery.
and China
and Mexico (cartels be like)
and certain parts of the US (coerced labor of illegal immigrants is still slavery)
And probably Russia
>this moronic comment on a website on the internet.
I'll take the US prison system for 500 Alex.
https://www.reuters.com/business/hershey-nestle-cargill-win-dismissal-us-child-slavery-lawsuit-2022-06-28/
Idiot.
It doesn't matter if it was built on slavery.
White people still made it possible with planning and knowledge from centuries of brutal oppression and war with eachother far worse than anything you could ever know. You couldn't do something useful in the thousands of years you've existed in your current lineages.
White people didn't enslave you, they made you worth a damn.
I swear, the arrogance of minorities to pretend like "DUH, AXCHUALLY WE MADE DA WEST AND MATHS N SMART STUFF N SHIET WE DA IMPORTANT WUNZ"
fricking stop. You're here because we gave you the choice. You CHOSE to stay, you have nobody but yourselves to blame. Frickers.
notice how they went silent
Well yeah, technically tribal people did enslave and genocide each other quite a bit
homies don't want to acknowledge that Africa was built on slavery. So many people think whitey went over to Africa specifically to enslave them, when in reality they went over there to establish trade and the Africans offered slaves in exchange for goods like guns and spices.
Slave ships didn't sail on the sabbath. I wonder why?
True, they just stopped in the middle of the ocean
The difference is that Proud Family is good
>The difference is that Proud Family is good
>The difference is that Proud Family is good
There's that as well. Also an easier sell to audiences and execs.
they should move to Liberia then
I’m just glad this show disproves any rumor that owl house got cancelled for being too gay when the new Proud Family is ten times gayer and more political than owl house ever was.
Also, LaCienega not being part of the group musical act tells me she’s a slave supporter too.
>uses technology invented by whiteys to b***h about whypipo
I really don't understand black anericans. Nnative americans barely complain on the same magnitudes as blacks. why?
redskins can't complain cuz they have land also they are almost extinct
>uses technology invented by whiteys
You didn't read The Art of War? It is a legitimate strategy to use the means of your enemy (or competition outside of war) to win.
Nobody really cares about anything, it's all grifting and feeling smug about how woke/based you are in your twitter clique. Also native americans don't take out loans to buy shoes so they aren't a target audience.
Visit any Indian reservation and ask yourself if they have the resources to do anything.
I can tell you’ve only been to the ones they show you on field trips in middle school. More than half of reservations have high speed internet.
>Nnative americans barely complain
This is how I know you're full of shit.
In America. In Canada they have whole wings of of the Federal government dedicated to them b***hing and getting gibs
>invented by whiteys
I cant believe the collective white race invented a thing
Is everyone below a specific melanin amount collectively responsible for slavery or not?
>youre a neolib
Wrong again.
Here's an idea: instead of trying to tar your opponent with the worst brush you have on hand, try responding to the points being made, however crude they may be.
>Is everyone below a specific melanin amount collectively responsible for slavery or not
Is everyone pertaining a certain religion responsible for everything bad that happened?
No, I'm not a collectivist. Are you?
>coleectivist
TL: Its okay if i dont do anything with my life since i can always leech off others because a trait I share with them
>blacks built America into the most powerful country in the world as slaves
>but they aren't able to build shit on their own in Africa
Doesn't this viewpoint just support the idea that Blacks are most effective as farming equipment and shouldn't be given free will?
>given free will
You either have it from birth, or it doesn't exist. Glad someone admits to the latter, though, instead of keeping up the lie.
Their effectiveness as farming equipment was questionable at best, and was only profitable in very particular industries such as pre-industrial cotton, sugar cane, and tobacco production. The American South and Indian Raj protested the abolition of slavery because they didn't yet have the infrastructure to fully industrialize.
Even then, the civil war wasn't even about the abolition of slavery - it was about the act of secession and state v federal power, which was partially fueled by the federal government and free states not wanting to extend slavery into the west. Abolition wasn't a real fear.
The only way it could have happened would be with a 3/4th Federal majority vote on a constitutional amendment, which wasn't possible. Most of the free states and the new western states were hard line segregationist, and were trying to ship Black people to Liberia, or otherwise to expell them from the north. There was also mass support for the Corwin Amendment by northern free states and Union slave state before the war, which made federal abolition illegal outside of the territories.
That's why one reason why alot of Confederates denied fighting for slavery. The war was over a state's right to self rule, the right of secession, and federalism vs antifederalism, not slavery per se.
Not per se, no, but the South wasn't industrialized enough to financially weather the abolition of slavery either. Many saw it as a deliberate attempt on behalf of the North to immiserate the South and force dependence, but that's all wrapped up in that anti-fed thing you mentioned.
But even then, that had nothing to do with slavery. The issue of the industrial north and the agricultural south goes back to the nullifaction crisis, and the Walker tariff (Georgia even mentions multiple tariffs in its ordinance of secession document). The tariffs put a massive tax on imported goods, including machinery. Southern cotton interested wanted industrialisation for their own respective states, but the north wasn't going to allow competition. So to enrich themselves while keeping southern states under their political thumb, they more or less banned the importation of machinery (Britian being the main source of the textile industrial machinery until after WWI), and ensured cotton would fuel northern textile mills.
In protest, John C. Calhoun brought up the issue of secession from the Union to ensure a better future for South Carolina. Andrew Jackson said that if they attempted secession, he would do worse to South Carolina than he did the Cherokee and Chickasaw.
I don't know about the israelite statistics, but 0.35% is absolutely not correct.
If you're counting only the states that condoned slavery and excluded the minority population, then over 5% of white people in Southern states directly owned slaves. If you include their families, the people that benefited from that ownership, then over 30% of of the Southern white population was part of a unit that owned slaves.
So if you took the 30% and somehow dropped it to 0.35%, then your ethnic israelites figure is clearly a fabrication.
https://socialequity.duke.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/8.10.20.pdf
>Let me pull numbers from a site dedicated to getting money from grifting to confirm my bias.
>deleted
SHUT IT DOWN
accelerate
It was
And your welcome for your first world life style
who cares about history? they are all dead now
>Chinese railroad workers who exploded every other day watching people who can't even speak their own language claim they built and invented everything
>"Muh black slavery built the US"
>like 95% of slaves worked in agriculture in the South
>by the time the Civil War happened slavery was unprofitable
>the Civil War and the objective failure of Reconstruction basically annihilated most of the businesses and plantations black slaves had a hand in
>the US Industrial Revolution only came into full swing after the Civil War, which is when the US really began to assert itself in international business and economics
Proud Family has always been woke since 2001, go leave
when i watched that show as a child i didn't notice any "woke" shit
> the episode where Penny went back to Jim Crow era
>The Muslim episode
>The Black League episode
>The Kawzaa episode
>The MLK episode
>Black History month episode
You blind homie
>Kwanzaa
Are you really willing to say that shit isn't embarrassing
Nobody cares if a black creator put stuff about his own race in his own works. That's not what woke means, it means whining about how he depicted the Asian triplets because they hate honest expression.
>Black History month episode
that shit didn't exist back then, are you making shit up?
>that shit didn't exist back then, are you making shit up?
>Oscar: we are celebrating Black History month
>In the shortest month of the year.
The role many minimum wage workers play in society is not meaningfully different from slaves. The technology is different, the wealth and the times, but not the role. I was saying this before woke politics became a big thing and they have to settle for shitty alternatives to My Views, because my views are Christian. I believe Jesus when he said the "poor will always be with you", but the condition of the slave equivalents can be improved perpetually
They also missed out on many of my cartooning ideas, they could have learned how to make the proud family better and truly good but they learn how to make it worse instead. "Loud and prideful" as the title says. What they get for rejecting me back in the late 00s when I just wanted to improve the world. The pathetic consequences of that decision are written all over their cartoons, and I love explaining how much their cartoons suck
But consider this: Your a homosexual AND the show is shit.
Im starting to believe the other anon in another thread with the HP hat that this is just bot generated outrage at this point. This is a special kind of poe's law hell we're in.
You will never be a showrunner.
Ahh sweet another /misc/ thread disguised on Cinemaphile
They put this in the cartoons, what else is there to do. Obviously your only defensive maneuver is to disqualify criticism
>guy confirmed to be from /misc/ not surprising.
Lmao hilarious. You're just reinforcing how pathetic the industry side is
Apparently you think this image is supposed to impress because that's what you say in the text, nobody can tell from the drawings.
Your spastic outrage is not going to protect calarts toons from meaningful criticism which people can see the meaning of regardless of what you do.
Black person no one wants to see your fricking pigslop art, people can hate calarts style and shitty shows and can say that you are a talentless homosexual that gets mogged by litteral /beg/ tier autists fricking around.
im 50/50 on unions. On one hand? Can be important for protecting employees rights and making sure everyone is owed there due. On the other? It can be a gargantuan clusterfrick of 'special privileges' and 'looking the other way if the money is right' along with getting press-ganged into a union that could be shit-teir gaygatory. You just cant win, still a very important graph to consider.
>put woke shit in cartoons
>whine when people talk about it
If you're going to talk about politics, talk about something important, like how corporations spend $300m a year busting unions so they don't have to pay you more than $7.25/hr.
Yeah, but Goldman-Sachs support LGBT rights, so we have to team up with them to beat the Nazis!
where is that stonetoss comic of the commie and the capitalist working together
GROOMER ALERT GROOMER ALERT! lmao
The shills are getting really frantic
You can't fricking write opinions on artwork into existence. The industry philosophy of the importance of "writing" has brought idiots like you into animation communities. You're not a beginner, you don't have the soul of an artist or a general creative. All you're going to do is watch the industry crumble apart
>im 50/50 on unions
And you proved my haters spend their time grooming about shit like marxism when they're not busy hating me, so that is screenshotted
That was already in the cartoons I grew up with. I thought you were talking about the original Proud Family
This post truly proves guy is a moron culture warrior beyond help
Id say it could be worse, he could be rufocuck, but guy literally raped a child
You say this nonsense about rape when my posts get really good, because you're saying that they "violate" your manchild soul. You hope that I will give up on making good posts with that obscene response
By beyond help you mean beyond being able to be groomed and become a part of the industry hivemind. That is not help
There was executive mandated nonsense back then too, it just wasn't extreme and ideological like these days. Cartoons had to have educational content and stuff
And it was part of a context in the 00s and late '90s when people felt like racism was becoming a thing of the past instead of a thing to constantly fight about
BTW, last commenter, I want to return to that time you idiot not keep fighting
By you being beyond help, i meant a child rapist using the word groomer to describe wage inequality.
It would be funny, but i think youre like a 30 year old man, so it's actually really sad.
Is he really 30? holy kek I thought he was a moronic zoomer this whole time
Yeah, i think being bullied on Cinemaphile throughout his 20's broke his brain. Now we just wait for his suicide
You're psychologically breaking up into spewing word salad. The sort of talent looking to break into animation these days and their psychological stamina
I don't want to be one
What pathetic hopes, saved for later. What you're going to wait for is me continuing to demolish the industry as I already have, its misfortunes come in part from my efforts.
Posting another comparison image since the first one made your brains go Haywire
ok pedophile
>"You can't fricking write opinions on artwork into existence"
>"Calarts is bad btw, heres my supirior art against there shitty art
lol
lmao
Also I just did, your art is shit and everyone agrees.
>"you don't have the soul of an artist or a general creative"
If what you have is considered 'soul' then im frickin glad I dont got what you have.
>'I dont understand unions!'
Glad we agree.
>mfw im around the same age
How can one 30 YO boomer get this fricking buck broken?
the newbies probably an heroed already at this point.
im a homosexual that forgot my eye catching image
>That was already in the cartoons I grew up with. I thought you were talking about the original Proud Family
What cartoons were you watching that had the KKK and burning crosses in them?
>Raise minimum wage
>Causes inflation because all you did is devalue the currency
>Union goes bust because no matter how many beaners it gets via agencies the money is worth less.
It's moronic because a 200% rise in """productivity""" means that 90% of your job is now automated, and are required to put in less effort than ever before, not that anyone is working 200% harder.
True, anyone who rates "Productivity" as some kind of metric for better wages is a fricking scam artist.
Yes I'm sure enjoying my one day work week since my job is 500% more productive than it was 80 years ago.
You absolute fricking goon.
Why do you deserve 90% more time off for doing 90% less work?
It's the same amount of work, just done 90% faster.
Minimum wage increases have trivial effects on inflation
Some claim to worry that raising the minimum wage might exacerbate our current inflation problem. This is not a serious concern. Consider the Raise the Wage Act, which would raise the minimum wage to $15 in five steps by 2027 and would be indexed to growth in median wages thereafter. If every penny of this higher minimum wage fed directly into higher prices—that is, none of it was financed by higher productivity or lower profits—the move to $15 would create a one-time step-increase in the overall price level of less than 0.5%. Spread over five years, this implies an average boost to inflation of less than 0.1% per year, after which it would fade to near-zero. This is completely trivial. Over the past two years, inflation has run at a rate about 100 times faster than this.
The math on this is relatively straightforward. As part of our analysis of previous versions of the Raise the Wage Act (and other minimum wage increases), we estimate the increase in the total wage bill generated by the higher minimum wage. That is, we multiply the number of workers affected by raising the minimum wage from its current level to $15 and then we estimate the average increase in wages they receive. This includes an estimate of “spillover” effects on workers who earn a bit above the new value of the minimum wage, and we assume no job loss stemming from these increases—both of which make our estimate of the effect on the total wage bill larger than it would be otherwise.
>The Math of this is relatively straightforward
>Doesn't actually show any calculations at all about how this would impact anything at all.
You didn't even explain where the 0.5% price increase would come from. Arbitrary changes to the Minimum wage do absolutely nothing to actually increase the spending power of people.
Tell me, where will the costs offsetting this wage increase come from? Oh right, higher end costs or job losses.
"B-But we calculated it trust us" is a fricking shitty argument.
>Tell me, where will the costs offsetting this wage increase come from? Oh right, higher end costs or job losses.
That's not supported by history or by any economic theory. Try again.
"we find prices grow by 0.36 percent for every 10 percent increase in the minimum wage."
https://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1278&context=up_workingpapers
>The dependent variable in this study is the change in the log of food away from home
CPI (FAFH CPI), a price index generated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for select U.S.
metropolitan areas.
So the entire study you are citing literally only uses one Government sourced group of statistics which is extremely small in terms of actual economic impact, and in fact the entire argument the paper makes hinges on using the CPI instead of using other metrics.
The CPI is literally worthless when measuring inflation, especially when we're not talking about the cost of food only.
Cost of food =/= the level of inflation you literal socialist mongoloid.
Oh, and for the record, the CPI is what Joe Biden keeps quoting to say we're not in a recession and inflation isn't so bad.
CPI IS HOW INFLATION IS MEASURED YOU ABSOLUTE FRICKING IDIOT.
The CPI is basically an arbitrary number generated by the fricking Government using an absolutely tiny slice of consumer goods.
The CPI doesn't cover how local price changes work and don't even fricking interact with the major mechanic of inflation, AKA the buying power of the currency going down.
>CPI is how inflation is measured
It's also grossly inaccurate and if you actually looked up how it is calculated you'd know why.
You sound like the kind of person who thinks Inflation is rising costs and not decreasing purchasing power.
>https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/012915/what-are-some-limitations-consumer-price-index-cpi.asp
The CPI is based entirely on the goods people PURCHASE, and people usually begin purchasing less affordable things when hit with economic downturns like a recession, impacting the CPI to lower much slower than the actual costs.
One example is energy bills, Which is more accurate, the directly calculated rise in energy costs by the energy companies which is around 30% right now, or the CPI saying it rose by 0.8%?
Yeah, and it worked didn't it?
Only goes to prove that slavery is useful, nice work woke-ists.
At least he didn't have to experience microagressions.
I mean...they're not wrong.
None of the infrastructure was made out of cotton.
seeing the KKK and burning crosses in a Disney cartoon for children is wild as frick honestly
And it's a nicely done image as well
White supremacy. like transphobia, is a consequence of observing reality objectively.
Witnessing the true horror of existence drives you insane and you start screaming about trannies as a coping mechanism
>troony gets triggered for the 50th time today
That's not cyberpunk, it's biopunk, since you are literally using organic tissue with no cybernetics at all, YOU FRICKING moron TWITTERgay!
I don't think they can hear you
I'm aware, but my statement remains. I refuse to go to twitter either way.
that's not cyberpunk is bodyhorror, why can't trans people just keep their penis, jesus
Yes because some random loser spouting nonsense has only become a problem now and never before in human civilization. Truly that's what dystopian writers were warning us about, dumbass opinions from strangers we can ignore.
Are you trying to say grafting skin from corpses to create false sexual organs for mentally unwell people isn't dystopian as frick?
Just die already, grandpa
>permeating the cotton skyscrapers myth.
Nah bro, cotton and tobacco pickers built north america. Watermelon farmers paved roads and nannies laid bricks.
What else do you expect. What do you think the Black Community would do in the US if they found out they were at best equipment for ultimately short term very narrow economic growth for an area of the US?
To be fair, Proud Family always had the social commentary in it. The episode where Penny goes back to racial segregation times, That one episode with the Muslim family, etc.
Proud Family is one of the shows that always had social commentary in some way or another even back in the day.
Why are conservatives so evil?
What's so evil about stopping people from jumping off a cliff?
Because dishonest c**tshits revel in the realm of unfalsifiable moral unquestionability, and will bend language and turn the world upside-down to stay on top of that illusory moral pyramid.
That is why you think they're evil.
Wanting poor people to die makes them objectively evil though. That's not even bringing up their obvious racism.
>YOU DON'T LIKE MY SOLUTIONS, SO YOU JUST WANT PEOPLE DEADEADEADEADEAD
>the frick is wrong with you?
>UMMMMMMMMMMM THE FRICK IS WRONG WITH YOU THAT YOU CAN'T JUST JERK OFF TO SNUFF FILMS IN YOUR OWN HOME AND HAVE TO SHOW YOUR SICK DEATH FETISH OFF TO THE PUBLIC
>what in the---
>ALSO YOU'RE RACIST
>Why are you---
>HEY! THIS FRICKER GETS OFF TO PEOPLE DYING! SOMEONE MAKE HIS WET DREAM COME TRUE AND KILL HIM IN REAL LIFE!
>wages haven't improved in decades
>GROOMER GROOMER GROOMER
ftfy.
your deflection simply proves how obviously evil you are.
Wrong guy.
I don't defend child drag shows, no.
Yes, "YOU'RE LITERALLY KILLING PEOPLE IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ME" is the telltale sign that whatever someone things they were fighting for is inconsequential in relation to their punch-drunk bloodlust, because it's not a long trip from that to "I HAVE THE RIGHT TO HURT YOU ON SPEC THAT YOU'RE A DIRTY WRONGTHINKER."
>wrong guy
No, you defend guy, who is a child rapist.
This isn't an accusation of wrongthink, it's an actual reflection of conservative actions.
I'm sure you believe that, and that's why I'm worried, because I know you're not the only one.
Well considering how you had a meltdown over someone showing you the rising wage disparity, I'd say you're genuinely evil.
I'll pray for you anon.
you defend child rapists
Holy schizo meltdown
Obvious projection of wanting me to die, as someone who came into the animation community a poor person who just wanted to draw some cartoons. Groomer
You mean a literal child lover, as you have literally said before. Y'know, like "Black person lover"
Cartoons should be made for the benefit of children and you can spew all the words you want but this simple truth remains
How about discussing fricking cartoons
Y'all don't even want to discuss the proud family, it's just a "platform" for politics
Imagine being stupid enough to believe poor people are responsible for inflation.
>LOOK! CHART!
Okay. And?
>ZOMFG ARE YOU STUPID OR SOMETHING?
Yes. Please explain your argument as if I am.
>UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM IT'S NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE YOU
Of course it's not...
>you defend guy
Literally where.
I thought conservatives were the party of logic and reason.
Tell that to a conservative.
>I'M JUST TALKING ABOUT [thing everyone cares about] SO WHY DO YOU LITERALLY JACK OFF TO PEOPLE DYING?
>coerced labor of illegal immigrants is still slavery
There's an easy way to solve that. Unfortunately, it's Racist™.
Oh I see, youre a neolib.
Nice, no other argument needed. You are evil and insane.
no, cuckservatives are just communists going the speed limit
the only rational political position is anti-marxist
We get it. You're an evil Nazi.
This is why you lose all the time btw
No, I'm anti-marxist.
Since marxists support everything evil, that mean I support everything that's good.
>t. doesn't know anything about history
By definition, you're a Nazi, but im actually proud of you for accepting that you'll always be loser.
>t. marxist
Sure kid, now do me a favor and look up thr literacy rate between cuba and florida
Id say the commies are kicking your ass at education, decucktis
Did you really think that was gonna convince him?
Who are you arguing with?
Cuba, the place where everyone is fleeing from due to communism, and then voting Republican because they don't want more communism?
First start by teaching an honest history of capitalism, including the coal wars, homestead massacre, triangle shirtwaist factory fire...
not start, but do so concordantly, commie.
He just said he's anti-socialist, how can he be a Nazi (national socialist)?
How can you make this argument unironically when Fascism [Franco's Spain and Portugal, notably] have far better success rates then your entire ideology?
Commies always btfo the nazis, so i can understand why you're eternally seething about them lmao
>one nobody with 4 retweets said this once so everyone i dont like must think that!
have a nice day homosexual
whom are you quoting
>>one nobody with 4 retweets
Means whatever he's talking about is popular enough to be repeated in earnest by people without a following.
No you're right, the Government is.
Is this graph trying to argue that profit is the reason for Inflation? Because that's fricking hilarious.
this thread is worst than usual, please delete this shit mods
>all art is political! cartoons were exactly like this 20 years ago!
>this thread
>Cinemaphile
~~*Goldblum*~~
I'm so glad I don't live in America. Jesus Christ. Imagine having to deal with this shit every day. And it's spreading to other countries too.
guy you draw like a legit schizo, if John K saw your drawings he would literally laugh in your face and hand you a noose to have a nice day with
Cartoons?
I sure do love Cinemaphile - comics & cartoons
Slavery in the US was a mistake.
If we never had slaves, we wouldn't have to deal with black people now.