The UK is full of morons who think they know anything about automobiles. You homosexuals didn’t even invent the car nor the process to quickly assemble one. Die in a hole.
the rule is simple >if on approach to the roundabout, your exit is past 12 o'clock on the sign, enter on the right-hand sign, if not enter on the left >move to the left-hand lane between the last exit before your exit and the exit, then exit
or alternatively where it's more complex, >follow the signage and road markings
They should just adopt American traffic customs and rules, we can show them the way
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
There are people who have never visited a town outside of their metropolitan city who looked at that comfy image and were furious at the thought that >pedestrians would probably get run over; that looks unsafe!
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>OMG I bet those houses aren't even in waking distance of a feminist bookstore coffee shop WTF
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
do americans really not have roundabouts? do they even know how to drive?
maybe, but i never would, it is a bit risky and stupidly british and europoorish
I thought it was bold for Texas, I know bongs do it, but they are nuts over there and drive like savages,in a different lane even
They should just adopt American traffic customs and rules, we can show them the way
"You can't send ME to jail for killing someone in a car accident, here!!"
"I didn't know the law! It's not MY fault!"
"And actually, the law doesn't make sense (to me)!!"
"I said it in a court-of-law!! In front of a judge!! Therefore, I'm LEGALLY RIGHT!!"
"WHAT THE FRICK!? You can't send me to jail!!!"
When the solution is more painful and confusing than the original problem itself, it doesn't count as a solution.
>roundabout
You mean a rotary? Lmao what do you call highways, sheep-billyworths?
The UK is full of morons who think they know anything about automobiles. You homosexuals didn’t even invent the car nor the process to quickly assemble one. Die in a hole.
Or just have a walkable city and you don't have to make up moronic rules for scenarios like this.
that is called a traffic circle here
do americans really not have roundabouts? do they even know how to drive?
The only car driving on the right side is the black one, you moron.
And that's just because it's a one-way street with two lanes, you moron.
Even if it was driving on the left side of the road and turning left the answer would be the same, you mongoloid.
Because it's the only one without any signal telling it to give way or stop, you fool.
What's the issue? Whoever got to the stop sign and stopped first goes first. If it's too close, you flash your lights at each other until someone goes.
1. Black - Zero sign parameters to slow it
2. Yellow - A single "Yield" parameter
3. Blue - It is taking no shift in action
4. Red - Its action requires shifting
And that's WITHOUT noticing this is an "island" since the vehicles are traveling on the left sides of the road.
Still have yet to see anyone to find a real world example of this exact intersection. It's not solvable because nobody builds roads like this to begin with.
Black obviously has right of way due to the road markings and signs, then blue since he's on the primary road and staying on the primary road, then red because he's on the primary road but turning onto the secondary, then yellow. Stop and Give Way hold equal status. Does nobody on Cinemaphile drive? Are you all just a bunch of fat housebound friendless sexless losers who can't drive?
>Stop and Give Way hold equal status.
This is precisely why you're wrong.
Also, let's play with the hypothetical of you being correct about that specific statement (which is, again, wrong); why are the legal commands phrased differently?
STOP means you have to come to a complete STOP before proceeding. It doesn't have any meaning related to yielding right of way.
GIVE WAY means you have to GIVE the right of WAY to other drivers
>unsolveable puzzle
i stopped following traffic laws a long time ago. if it were me at that intersection i'd simply wait until it was safe for me to go then i'd peel out of there regardless of who had right of way
This is a completely moronic road, and you will never find Yield signs anywhere but on city busses, railroad crossings, or junctions with heavy merging. If a side road doesn't have a Stop sign, then the Yield Sign is implied; but here goes...
The two-way stop will NEVER have right-of-way to the north and south-bound roads. The Yield sign only pertains to the south-bound road, so Black would go first. Since Yellow only has to yield to black, they would go second.
Once the north and south side roads are cleared, then the cars at the two-way stop would go. In theory it would be whoever reached the stop first gets to go first, or the right-most car goes first with the right-of-way following a counter-clockwise fashion. Realistically, it will come down to common courtesy, and depending on the drivers' age, it will end up with both cars sitting there waiting for the other, until one of the cars decides to go forward. Most likely the red truck.
As for the actual point of OP's thread... I don't think I've ever seen a unsolvable puzzle in a movie.
Here in the UK we solved this problem almost a 100 years ago with the invention of a roundabout
we still have staggered junctions
but the pic is clearly from either the UK or somewhere like Aus
every car in the pic is driving on the left; it's just black is coming out of a one-way street
When the solution is more painful and confusing than the original problem itself, it doesn't count as a solution.
>roundabout
You mean a rotary? Lmao what do you call highways, sheep-billyworths?
The UK is full of morons who think they know anything about automobiles. You homosexuals didn’t even invent the car nor the process to quickly assemble one. Die in a hole.
that is called a traffic circle here
are you allowed to move from the inner to the outer circle?
maybe, but i never would, it is a bit risky and stupidly british and europoorish
if you select the correct lane on entrance you won't need to change lanes
then it's not a true roundabout, it's a junction
you fricking mong
Never, once you enter the inner circle you must remain in it forever.
No, that’s what the snipers are there for.
having multiple lanes in a roundabout is just asking for a steady supply of accidents
I thought it was bold for Texas, I know bongs do it, but they are nuts over there and drive like savages,in a different lane even
imagine when the paint erodes away
the rule is simple
>if on approach to the roundabout, your exit is past 12 o'clock on the sign, enter on the right-hand sign, if not enter on the left
>move to the left-hand lane between the last exit before your exit and the exit, then exit
or alternatively where it's more complex,
>follow the signage and road markings
The british should be euthanized to spare them from themselves.
They should just adopt American traffic customs and rules, we can show them the way
There are people who have never visited a town outside of their metropolitan city who looked at that comfy image and were furious at the thought that
>pedestrians would probably get run over; that looks unsafe!
>OMG I bet those houses aren't even in waking distance of a feminist bookstore coffee shop WTF
These things are for countries too poor to afford traffic lights.
That looks like hell
"You can't send ME to jail for killing someone in a car accident, here!!"
"I didn't know the law! It's not MY fault!"
"And actually, the law doesn't make sense (to me)!!"
"I said it in a court-of-law!! In front of a judge!! Therefore, I'm LEGALLY RIGHT!!"
"WHAT THE FRICK!? You can't send me to jail!!!"
t. modern society
do americans really not have roundabouts? do they even know how to drive?
For Pete's sake...
What's the problem here? They move depending on who arrived at the intersection first. It's called right of way.
We do, but they're called rotaries.
>We do, but they're called rotaries.
Hello fellow mbutthole
CT actually but close enough.
woman moment
Literally footage where they had to avoid unfinished tarmac while the road was under construction.
We do.
People typically treat them like a yield on an on-ramp so they're typically less effective than a four way stop.
black yellow blue red gotta be moronic to not get
Black, yellow then depending on who got there first blue or red
>t. moron that didn't get
it's black yellow red and blue because the red one is at the right of the blue
In seattle they'd all wait till I go regardless of which position I'm at
This puzzle is literally solved already by not having half the cars drive on the right side of the road and the other half drive on the left.
The only car driving on the right side is the black one, you moron.
And that's just because it's a one-way street with two lanes, you moron.
Even if it was driving on the left side of the road and turning left the answer would be the same, you mongoloid.
Because it's the only one without any signal telling it to give way or stop, you fool.
Why does the straight road have the stop sign?
reasons
it's a queer road
black yellow blue red?
Black
Blue
Red
Yellow
Check the side of the road they're driving, and also the stop signs.
ok, just noticed it. this makes no sense. some cars are driving on the left while others on the right.
Or just have a walkable city and you don't have to make up moronic rules for scenarios like this.
It's actually a trick puzzle, the cars are driving on the wrong side of the road.
black goes first, same turn as yellow but yellow has a yield sign
yellow 2nd
blue 3rd, has stop sign but going straight
red 4th, stop sign and turning
Did anyone else have that puzzle game where you need to figure out a way to get the red car out
It was awesome
black, yellow, blue, red
got my drivers permit at 15, get fricked neets
yellow has a yield sign though so it should be last no?
Yielding is a less powerful command than STOP.
No
Black yellow red blue
>stop signs on wrong side of road
The answer is simple, it's fricking homosexuals
What's the issue? Whoever got to the stop sign and stopped first goes first. If it's too close, you flash your lights at each other until someone goes.
I'd go first because I'm in the only vehicle that matters.
>GIVE WAY
What?
1. Black - Zero sign parameters to slow it
2. Yellow - A single "Yield" parameter
3. Blue - It is taking no shift in action
4. Red - Its action requires shifting
And that's WITHOUT noticing this is an "island" since the vehicles are traveling on the left sides of the road.
Three of those morons are on the wrong side of the road.
Black > Blue > Red > Yellow
No
Still have yet to see anyone to find a real world example of this exact intersection. It's not solvable because nobody builds roads like this to begin with.
It's instantly solvable to anyone actively participating in it due to experience with "right-of-way."
Legally, it's also "solvable" since each vehicle has different parameters encompassing their signaled actions.
Black obviously has right of way due to the road markings and signs, then blue since he's on the primary road and staying on the primary road, then red because he's on the primary road but turning onto the secondary, then yellow. Stop and Give Way hold equal status. Does nobody on Cinemaphile drive? Are you all just a bunch of fat housebound friendless sexless losers who can't drive?
>Stop and Give Way hold equal status.
This is precisely why you're wrong.
Also, let's play with the hypothetical of you being correct about that specific statement (which is, again, wrong); why are the legal commands phrased differently?
Language, especially legal, is important.
Incorrect anon
STOP means you have to come to a complete STOP before proceeding. It doesn't have any meaning related to yielding right of way.
GIVE WAY means you have to GIVE the right of WAY to other drivers
stop sign does mean give way actually
Not if there's also a Give Way sign.
no, stop sign always implies you should give way after stopping
>unsolveable puzzle
i stopped following traffic laws a long time ago. if it were me at that intersection i'd simply wait until it was safe for me to go then i'd peel out of there regardless of who had right of way
Cars are in the wrong lanes bucko
Black goes
Then red when the lane is clear
Then blue when black is ahead
Then yellow as it has to give way
Doesn't matter that the lane positions are mixed.
Oops thought red was going straight ahead, so I need to swap red and blue.
i don't think i even know how right of way works anymore i just drive forward before other people have the chance to react.
Yellow red and blue need to change lanes then problem solved
whoever arrives first goes first. not rocket science. why is this shit thread getting so many replies
This is a completely moronic road, and you will never find Yield signs anywhere but on city busses, railroad crossings, or junctions with heavy merging. If a side road doesn't have a Stop sign, then the Yield Sign is implied; but here goes...
The two-way stop will NEVER have right-of-way to the north and south-bound roads. The Yield sign only pertains to the south-bound road, so Black would go first. Since Yellow only has to yield to black, they would go second.
Once the north and south side roads are cleared, then the cars at the two-way stop would go. In theory it would be whoever reached the stop first gets to go first, or the right-most car goes first with the right-of-way following a counter-clockwise fashion. Realistically, it will come down to common courtesy, and depending on the drivers' age, it will end up with both cars sitting there waiting for the other, until one of the cars decides to go forward. Most likely the red truck.
As for the actual point of OP's thread... I don't think I've ever seen a unsolvable puzzle in a movie.
>I don't think I've ever seen a unsolvable puzzle in a movie
whos on first?
the Abbott and Costello bit?
>electric auto milker