https://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1533052690586124289
>Movies with more Europeans, men, fewer non-Europeans, fewer women are higher rated by audiences, make more money etc.
>Note the Indian IMDB bias. Indians inflate their ratings in the extreme, IMDB allows this for some reason.
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
>"its your rayciss fault our shitty movies suck"
This - I'll bet hard currency this correlation is down to the simple fact that most movies heavily featuring people of colorinos are either activist pieces first & foremost and so they're shit to watch; wanky highbrow arthouse shit that nobody likes anyway; or they spend the entire marketing budget harping on about how Stunning And Brave the film is - making people think it's one of the previous two even if it isn't - and how dumb smelly straightwhitemales should just stay away it's not for you blah blah.
Make a good film, cast good actors in it, and market it on the basis of its *narrative content* and guess what, people will watch and enjoy your movie. Yes, even the ones with ridiculous flappy-lipped monkey-nosed pitch black jigaboos as main characters: even most racists - like most of any amorphous grouping of humanity - don't give enough of a shit about it to pass up an enjoyable experience, so they'll watch the film and just mentally file those particular gollies as "some of the good ones".
The only people killing nonwhite cinema are the braindead student union-politics idiots making it.
next time someone asks you what the problem is with forced diversity you have empirical evidence to show them that diversity is associated with lower perceived quality
why are we pretending that the diversity cult can be reasoned with? their job is to subvert, dismantle, and destroy, how do you not see this by now?
i know but what else is there to be done except to try to refute them as best you can
even talks about the idea he mentions above — the excuse of “historical accuracy” that some people often give to justify an all-white cast — “[W]e’ve kind of got to tell a lie: we’ll go back into history and there will be black people where, historically, there wouldn’t have been, and we won’t dwell on that. We’ll say, ‘To hell with it, this is the imaginary, better version of the world. By believing in it, we’ll summon it forth.’”
I remind myself of this quote every time some crazy SJW attempts to gaslight me and project their obvious propaganda and delusions onto me as a deflection. They're the ones who admit they're denying reality and want to change it with their distorted version of it.
Never forget that they're the self-confessed propagandists that want to rewrite and change history because real life happens to go against their beliefs. They're the ones who refuse to accept reality and make the best of the situation. They literally can't cope.
my girlfriend just scoffs at it and says "ye but millions of people like me still watch it and it inspires young minorities"
Inspires them to do what? Consume more?
but empirically hispanic and black minorities don't accomplish jack shit. and giving them more "representation" necessarily decreases white representation which makes white people sadder.
> minorities
This word was made with one particular purpose in mind and isn't even valid anymore in it's country of origin. Stop using it.
Why are you such a cuck?
>European men rate movies with European men higher
Yeah, if it IMDB was Indian Movie Database the best movies would be Shaakamuar 2.0 and scored would be proportional to how long the dance scene is
men rate movies with European men higher
doesn't necessarily work that way. leftists for example have a bias against white people. and i'm going to guess imdb users are disproportionately liberal.
>i'm going to guess imdb users are disproportionately liberal.
Why? It's not Letterboxd. IMDB is mostly normalgays and basic b***h redditors.
in general the internet is going to be more liberal because internet users and especially power users skew young and "artsy". this is especially going to be the case for movie/tv stuff. the chart is damning either way though because the anti-white liberal bias outweighs the pro-white conservative bias. so even if they were equally represented you wouldn't expect movies associated with white people to score so highly on that basis.
yea this is another problem. as people's theories get knocked down empirically they just come up with adhoc explanations that still conform to their political beliefs.
These stats concern in-group selection on the political level. It's not necessarily the same when it comes media consumption.
>on the political level
it's just measuring warmth toward white people/minorities and dividing by political leaning.
>It's not necessarily the same when it comes media consumption.
you can come up with adhoc reasons why it's not actually true or doesn't actually apply or whatever (pic related - looks like this has actual real world implications), but it's sufficient reason to discount the leftist narrative that white casts are rated higher because white people love white people.
>because white people love white people
Nobody said this, though. It's more likely that, instead of preferring a movie because of a racial bias, people are simply more able to identify with a film that depicts their culture and its issues. That's also why the post that started this all said European, not white.
You are saying this as if it was obvious but I remember shitlibs here arguing that people love watching movies with blacks in them.
I love Black Dynamite tho
This is unironically why we need unconscious bias training
Or because before minorities even worked in LA it was largely white male actors and movies were only made when they knew it would be a successful movie. Now they churn out whatever filled with whoever not giving a shit about the message or anything.
I have no idea what this chart means. Can someone with high IQ explain?
https://rightwingtomatoes.com/analytics/tab_ethnicity/budget_50000-500000/minus-genre_animation/release_2000-2018/type_movies/current_m17126/showcast_2_1/stacking_percent/vis_regression/xaxis_boxprofit/yaxis_mf/setup_cwj_noclasters
pic
Why does a movie review site have a bunch of graphs and maps about ethnicity?
Because "they" made movies political
do you know how expensive and how much work you have to do to make something original? Its much easier to use the dedicated fanbase anger as a publicity stunt
OK? But why does your ethnic map on you movie review website list Brazil as white but Spain as latino? And why is Somaliland a clusterfrick of 15 different, mostly Caribbean, ethnicities?
White men have a 30 year lead on IMDB voting for movies
That is all
>White men have a 30 year lead on IMDB voting for movies
what?
Indian cinema has long since surpassed hollywood
I dont. Fricking. Care.
i hate culture warriors
>Note the Indian IMDB bias. Indians inflate their ratings in the extreme, IMDB allows this for some reason
They don't inflate shit
There's more indians that all of white people combined
>Setup Combine White & israelite
Lol!
you can remove that variable and nothing changes
based
Uhmmm sweaty, it’s further proof that bipoc are marginalized mmmmkay?
IMDB really is a den of racist chuds