Name a single flaw in this movie.

Name a single flaw in this movie.

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >STOP! MY-

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      uhh except that one

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It is not a real defect. It's just a meme

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Zod's snapped neck

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      how is that a flaw

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would sups tell that nerd to go and hide inside a house when they're about to destroy the whole town dragon ball style?

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    killing off zod. not because of 'superman never kills' but because michael shannon did an amazing job as zod and DC cinematic movies are sorely hurting for an actual good villain.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why is that a problem with DC and not with 30+ Marvel movies?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is. A good half the reason marvel is in the situation it's in now is because all of it's GOOD villains are frickin dead. 25% is because all the good leads are retiring and the other 25% is because the writers have become wokeslop Black personhomosexuals.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >all of it's GOOD villains are frickin dead
          MCU hasn't done Doctor Doom or Magneto or Apocalypse or Venom (they've teased a Not-Tom Hardy version of him) or Hobgoblin or Galactus yet. Plus there's Kingpin and Bullseye who are not dead

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >all of it's GOOD villains are frickin dead.
          kingpin and bullseye are still alive, albeit. but you’re right about everything else.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Replacing the destiny/great power brings great responsibility aspect of the Superman mythos with a "only do it if you feel like it, let children (and me) die to protect your secret" sentiment, and generally ruining Jonathan Kent's role in Superman's origin.
      >Casting a nearly walled actress who doesn't look or act like the character to play Lois Lane.
      >Having Superman kill Zod in the end. I get it from an in-universe perspective, but you don't want a Superman reboot to be controversial in any way, dunno why Snyder and Goyer did that. To show how much Superman cares for people, if he's willing to do that to protect them? No idea.
      >A final battle that's way too long, epic and destructive for a Superman origin story. It was ridiculously massive, what were the next movies supposed to show? BvS and ZSJL's final acts felt like a Smallville episode in comparison because of that.
      >Lack of charisma from Cavill. I think they wanted to show him transitioning from mopey, lost and unsure of himself to the confident cheerful Superman we all know, but that last part never really came.
      >Removing one of the most basic aspects of the Superman mythos, his dual identity and how that affects his relationship with Lois.
      Other than those things I liked it, but Snyder and Goyer should have taken a more conventional approach, you're not supposed to be all experimental, edgy and cool with a Superman origin story.

      I don't remember if Kryptonian soldier gf died, I hope not.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Lois Lane is able to figure out Superman's identity by just asking a few random townsfolk some questions
    >the US government, Lex Luthor, and Batman are more stupider than some broad

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You literally got filtered by something simple.

      Lois Lane learned who Clark was because she CARED to learn about the man behind the story, which is also WHY she never published the story, despite being a career making story, because she cared for the MAN.

      The US, Lex Luthor, and Batman never CARED for the MAN behind the costume, they just saw his awesome powers as a threat and his figure as a potential enemy, which is why they DEHUMANIZED him as an ALIEN. Something to be STOPPED rather than UNDERSTOOD.

      Then you add the 9/11 imagery, Superman's plight as an immigrant, the criminal kryptonians actions as terrorism, and you've in your hands a very heavy-handed allegory for the WAR ON TERROR during the Bush era, and the prevalent ISLAMPHOBIA of the time.
      You had Batman quoting Dick Chaney in BvS, just to drive the point home.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Dick Cheney is Batman.

        It is an interesting read. I don't understand why Snyder's capeshit movies carry all that hate considering that Nolan's Batman drew inspiration from Bush's politics.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Syders films are too edgy 4 normies

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            absolutely wasted get

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >516
              AEBZ

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >That ontario licence plate
                was it filmed in Canada?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, Bateman just liked to think he was being original by having a weird license plate on his car. Ironically all of the other guys at the office also went for faux-Canadian plates.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              cope

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            snyders problem isn't edginess it's pretentiousness and I say this as a MoS and BvS and watchmen fan

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >pretentiousness is a bad thing
              HUH? Why?
              Im genuinely asking

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                because he can't take criticism seriously his worst movies are army of the dead the two rebel moon slops the snyder cut just made him go full moron, snyder works best with good writers who understand his vision

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I agree with you on his worst films. I think he's simply just having fun doing what he wants and if we dont like it oh well. I'd do the same as a filmmaker.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that still won't stop us from talking shit about his bad films

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Kek, this is your argument? If Superman was real, Government would be the first knowing and catch him to experiment with him. Lois Lane ruined this movie.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >women ruined the movie
          >my xenophobic government would overpower the immortal immagrsnt
          Pffff ... okay now.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >believing that something will happen equals endorsing it

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              why would you believe in something bad?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why would you want to watch a movie where an evil government wins unless you like that

                kinda, ya. think about it. if you fantasize about something you like it. so avtively watching a movie that has a bad type government would be endorcing it.

                This is a childish way of thinking.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. It's moral. If you thinking caring about people's well being is childish I feel very very very very sorry for how you see the world. Thinking totalititarian governments are better than superman? Why? Sad stuff dude.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Why would you want to watch a movie where an evil government wins unless you like that

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              kinda, ya. think about it. if you fantasize about something you like it. so avtively watching a movie that has a bad type government would be endorcing it.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >believing that something will happen equals endorsing it

          Let me guess. You also liked the sexism in the BvS? Let me guess you liked the racism in Joker? Let me guess you dont like "race swapping" in superhero flicks.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I only made the second post.

            No. It's moral. If you thinking caring about people's well being is childish I feel very very very very sorry for how you see the world. Thinking totalititarian governments are better than superman? Why? Sad stuff dude.

            >Thinking totalititarian governments are better than superman?
            Once again confusing belief/expectation with endorsement. Do you choose not to believe in the Gaza genocide because believing in it would be supporting it?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I believe israel doesnt exist because it doesnt. gaza is real and innocent
              Superman is Palestine in your analogy

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I only made the second post.
              Okayy? It doesn't negate what I said

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So do you actually believe that it's immoral to show bad things happening in a film? Doesn't that make Snyder immoral for making ultra violent films where people die?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              why are you so obsessed with bringing politics into this? facist america? facist isreal?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Snyder's DC movies are political as frick. It is basically Zack Snyder crying about muslim being persecuted. Why do you think Ben Affleck not only accepted to play Batman, but actively produced BvS?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Don't forget Snyder using a good chunk of the movie, which could have been used to develop the character or tight the plot, on some inane scenes just because he wanted to bash the mainstream media and journalism.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its ugly

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are you all posting plotholes instead of talking about the more important stuff like the awful tone, the dreadful cinematography and color grading, the borderline unwatchable third act etc etc

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was boring shit

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only people who didn't like this movie are Americans because of all the destruction.

    >Oh my god, those are CGI buildings collapsing under their own weight? Oh no! I can't stand it, my PTSD from 9/11 is coming back. Aaaaahhhhhhhh!

    Shameful

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      KEK this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      KEK this

      sirs there was no jetfuel used in the melting of stealbeams in this movie, please confirm it

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > Bush save us from Kryptonian terrorists!

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wanton destruction, but Cavill and Shannon's performances as well as the score make up for it

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cavill's Superman is the most boring version of the character, zero personality.
    Same for Amy Adams' Lois.
    The out of order narrative doesn't have any real point, beyond ripping off Nolan's Batman.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're the answer to "are we alone in the universe?"

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Doesn't get rid of governments.
    He is scum.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It didn't live up to how absolutely kino the trailer was

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How long've you got?

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >man of steel
    >actually a regular man made not of steel
    >0 erections

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Man of Steel was awesome, and Arcade has a permanent spot on my workout playlist.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Lois falls and defies the massive pull of that machine
    >Superman too op for anyone else to matter in the universe (I actually think that's a good thing but it does make everyone else irrelevant)
    >Ugly de-colorized filter
    It's been a while since I've seen the movie so I can't really come up with more flaws but there you go.
    Also, was there a reason why Zod couldn't just colonize a different planet? Jesus, it's been like 7y+. My memory has gone to shit

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It was a talking dog, you know what I mean?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      as mentioned
      >singularity is sucking everything else in but Lois is falling away from it, for some reason, so that she doesn't die and Supes can catch her
      Also how Lois teleports to wherever the movie wants
      >Lois watches Supes and Zod and satellite debris fall from the sky way off in the distance, many miles away
      >Lois runs into the courthouse to witness the neck snap 40 seconds later lmao

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sure, the director

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Man of Steel raises an important philosophical question: Should gods live among men?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Should gods live among men?
      If they're as nice and hot as Clark, yes
      Otherwise nuke them down

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's not even "should" it's "would". Anyone with powers like Superman would obviously choose to live the most free life they could, going anywhere he wanted, doing anything he wanted, basically free to indulge any whim he liked, because no one could stop him and certainly no one would want to draw his attention. He wouldn't live among men, the same way we don't live among rats or pigeons. They live around us. We would live around Superman.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Anyone with powers like Superman would obviously choose to live the most free life they could, going anywhere he wanted, doing anything he wanted, basically free to indulge any whim he liked, because no one could stop him and certainly no one would want to draw his attention
        Clark has been raised by honest, loving hardworking people, not the failures that created the autists on this site. He stays around normal people because he cares

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is also why I hate the people who think they're being clever and go "all other heroes wear a mask to hide their identity but Clark Kent is Superman's mask so he doesn't have to wear one!". Clark most definitely IS his identity. He'd have to turn Clark Kent into an butthole paparazzi for it to be a mask.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Mild-mannered Clark is the mask. The shy, clumsy Clark that everyone disregards at the Daily Planet is not the real Clark. Superman is an aspect of the real Clark. Ultimately, farmboy Clark is his real self.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Farmboy Clark is also mild-mannered, though. It's not like people from his school who bump into him go "what the hell happened dude? You're like a completely different person since you moved to the big city!". The only stuff that's not him is the shyness(except even there he should be a bit shy when Lois really hits on him, only acting braver as Superman and shyer as Clark to make them seem drastically different) and most importantly the clumsiness. But those things don't match up to a personality, like how Batman acts like a completely different person than Batman. All of his convictions and beliefs remain the same and he's most definitely not just pretending to be a human.

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Replacing the destiny/great power brings great responsibility aspect of the Superman mythos with a "only do it if you feel like it, let children (and me) die to protect your secret" sentiment, and generally ruining Jonathan Kent's role in Superman's origin.
    >Casting a nearly walled actress who doesn't look or act like the character to play Lois Lane.
    >Having Superman kill Zod in the end. I get it from an in-universe perspective, but you don't want a Superman reboot to be controversial in any way, dunno why Snyder and Goyer did that. To show how much Superman cares for people, if he's willing to do that to protect them? No idea.
    >A final battle that's way too long, epic and destructive for a Superman origin story. It was ridiculously massive, what were the next movies supposed to show? BvS and ZSJL's final acts felt like a Smallville episode in comparison because of that.
    >Lack of charisma from Cavill. I think they wanted to show him transitioning from mopey, lost and unsure of himself to the confident cheerful Superman we all know, but that last part never really came.
    >Removing one of the most basic aspects of the Superman mythos, his dual identity and how that affects his relationship with Lois.
    Other than those things I liked it, but Snyder and Goyer should have taken a more conventional approach, you're not supposed to be all experimental, edgy and cool with a Superman origin story.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's basically trying to be Superman's equivalent of Batman Begins, down to the non-linear narrative. But Snyder is no Nolan, so there's not really any real narrative for this choice, beyond ripping-off Begins.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the story was written by Goyer and Nolan

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This. Nolan wanted to give it a science fiction approach and not a capeshit, although yes, although we must recognize that he also decided that Superman will kill Zod

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, why does Snyder get exclusively blamed for the DCU movies when they were written by the same people behind the Dark Knight trilogy which normies worship?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            A director still has a lot of influence over the project and story, especially one like Snyder who cared about the source material as a fan, but in the "wrong way".

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Lack of charisma from Cavill
      Opinion discarded. Only in this shithole you hear this when it's obvious that people like him

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not as Superman. Zero personality.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I mean as Superman, he can definitely play a cheerful, likable and charismatic character as shown in Man from UNCLE, but with the exception of a few moments in ZSJL I never really felt he acted like Superman.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Opinion discarded. Only in this shithole you hear this when it's obvious that people like him

        Is that why all of his movies bomb?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Replacing the destiny/great power brings great responsibility aspect of the Superman mythos with a "only do it if you feel like it, let children (and me) die to protect your secret" sentiment, and generally ruining Jonathan Kent's role in Superman's origin.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Batman also kills people in the very early issues, that doesn't mean Batman killing people is considered a core part of his mythos rather than just a historical curiosity from a bygone era where these characters weren't fully formed yet.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And BvS was all about how Batman killing IS WRONG, and it makes him a BAD GUY.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Batfleck continues to kill in both Justice League and The Flash, tho.
            #ParademonLivesMatter

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The Flash doesn't count and he doesn't kill in the Justice League movies. Not the one that counts, anyway.
              Parademons are already dead. It's okay. Wonder Woman said so.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yeah but there's still precedent right from the source material, it's not some random thing Snyder pulled out of his ass

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Precedent from the source material so outdated that it might as well not be canon or exist in the public's default perception of the character, you're reaching and you know it.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              lukewarm IQ take
              >Every capeshitterkino has to be exactly like the current run of comics
              Why? thats predicable and boring

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >muh mythos
          Pandering to Batman fanboys was the worst thing WB has ever done. "Realistic" and "grounded" Batman that never kills is the most idiotic concept put on film. The Nolan/Reeves Batman wouldn't last one night in the real world

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The Nolan/Reeves Batman wouldn't last one night in the real world
            It's a good thing it was a movie then.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        one of the few smart people ITT

        Batman also kills people in the very early issues, that doesn't mean Batman killing people is considered a core part of his mythos rather than just a historical curiosity from a bygone era where these characters weren't fully formed yet.

        >batman cant kill because of my comics code of conduct blah blah
        BORING

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        listen here moron
        >prioritizing making your son morally responsible rather than muh power muh responsibility is the best set up for his bvs evil superman in justice league ark with absolute power corrupts absolutely

        this isn't the 1970s and superman as a representative of America doesn't hold the moral righteousness of pre 9/11 and iraq war

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll give you several:
    >Kents are treated as cowards who tell Clark to hide and not help people, completely counter to the couple of raised him to care about truth, justice, and doing the right thing
    >Superman jumps straight from bumming around the arctic for a few years, to wearing a suit and beating major villains in fights
    >no establishment of a relationship between Clark and Lois, jumps straight to her already knowing he's Superman really fricking easily
    >Zod is wasted on not only a "superhero origin story" but also one that was just a series of shaky cam CG zoom outs of tiny figures shooting around like bullets
    >the plot that Superman has all of Krypton's DNA in him is laughably moronic
    >Zod, a supposedly genuis strategist, takes his terraformer directly to Earth instead of to Mars or Venus first to set up an outpost
    >Superman has never trained in hand-to-hand combat but can beat multiple superpowered soldiers who did nothing but fight people
    >no reason at all for Lois to end up on the ship other than "oh but she's one of the characters"
    >entire film is miserable and whiny, instead of hopeful and triumphant
    >story mattered less than Zack Snyder getting his "artful" screenshots that he loves so much (literally just makes films as a collection of shots he wanted to see and works out afterwards how they connect, even if they're not relevant)
    Frick, I hated it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>Zod, a supposedly genuis strategist, takes his terraformer directly to Earth instead of to Mars or Venus first to set up an outpost
      I'll never understand this complaint. People watched the movie, right? General Zod wanted to spite Superman.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And a brilliant strategist can still spite their enemies without FAILING TO STRATEGISE.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He thought Superman would be easily dealt with.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry, you're still not getting this. Zod is a master strategist, meaning he has backup plans, and thinks things through, and takes into account potential outcomes. He's not you, randomly chimping out with low IQ, unable to think of consequences of your actions.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              He's also described as a fanatic. He thought of Superman as an abomination, a sacrilege. Something that shouldn't exist.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See

                Sorry, you're still not getting this. Zod is a master strategist, meaning he has backup plans, and thinks things through, and takes into account potential outcomes. He's not you, randomly chimping out with low IQ, unable to think of consequences of your actions.

                until it sinks in.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. Watch the movie again. You're taking the strategist part and thinking General Zod should behave like comics Batman, full of plot-armor.
                General Zod in the movie is described as set in his ways, as an extremist willing to do everything for his beliefs, and a fanatic.

                He wanted to terraform the planet because it was available. He didn't care about humanity because he thought of humans as less than dirty. He wanted to kill Superman because he saw Superman as an abomination that shouldn't be allowed to exist. Superman was even given a test to prove his loyalty to the kryptonian people and General Zod's righteous cause, but Superman failed in General Zod's eyes, proving once and for all that Superman was a mistake that needed to be corrected.

                General Zod is literally meant to be Osama Bin Laden, for frick's sake.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You're taking the strategist part and thinking General Zod should behave like comics Batman, full of plot-armor.
                No, I'm thinking if he's a strategist, he needs to at least display a basic level of strategy. If I can think up these really simple steps, he should be able to as well.

                I think this issue is that you're so low-IQ that you even, even moronic Zod seems smart, which explains why you're trying to defend a film as bad as Man of Steel in the first place.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What would be you great strategy then, smart-pants?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I already told you and you already responded to it, dumbass.

                >>Zod, a supposedly genuis strategist, takes his terraformer directly to Earth instead of to Mars or Venus first to set up an outpost
                I'll never understand this complaint. People watched the movie, right? General Zod wanted to spite Superman.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                First the movie tells you that to terraform a planet you still need a solid foundation.
                Second Superman brought General Zod to a planet that was already perfect for terraforming.
                Third General Zod doesn't care about the indigenous people of said planet. Everything is a fair game to bring back Krypton the way he saw fit.
                Fourth Superman is seen as an abomination by General Zod, so Superman's tie or opinion about said planet's indigenous people is meaningless.
                FIFTH THE MOVIE ALREADY SHOWED YOU SEVERAL KRYPTONIAN OUTPOSTS THAT FAILED BECAUSE THEY SET UP IN A GALAXY WITH UNSUSTAINABLE PLANETS.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >First the movie tells you that to terraform a planet you still need a solid foundation.
                Already available on both Venus and Mars.
                >Second Superman brought General Zod to a planet that was already perfect for terraforming.
                General Zod is a strategist. Setting up an outpost is the first thing in any invasion scenario. Sending in scouts is another thing. Not revealing all of your cards is yet another.
                >Third General Zod doesn't care about the indigenous people of said planet. Everything is a fair game to bring back Krypton the way he saw fit.
                Literally irrelevant.
                >Fourth Superman is seen as an abomination by General Zod, so Superman's tie or opinion about said planet's indigenous people is meaningless.
                Literally irrelevant.
                >FIFTH THE MOVIE ALREADY SHOWED YOU SEVERAL KRYPTONIAN OUTPOSTS THAT FAILED BECAUSE THEY SET UP IN A GALAXY WITH UNSUSTAINABLE PLANETS.
                I'VE SAID TERRAFORM SO HE HAS AN OUTPOST, NOT SO HE HAS A PERMANENT WORLD AND NEVER EVER TAKES EARTH ONCE HE'S FINISHED, YOU DENSE FRICK. NOT TO MENTION THEY HAVE SUPERMAN POWERS IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM.

                Seriously, all of your problems with this concept is because you're actually moronic and can't think ahead at all.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Already available on both Venus and Mars.
                Wrong. Both are out of the habitable zone of the Solar System

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Holy frick, you are so moronic. Both are inside it. Neither needs to be made a permanent settlement. They need an outpost, both would be suitable. Stop being so fricking stupid all of your life.
                https://science.nasa.gov/resource/what-is-the-habitable-zone/

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Already available on both Venus and Mars.
                Wrong. Both are out of the habitable zone of the Solar System

                You know what, I actually take back calling you stupid and moronic just because you don't understand. It was mean and needlessly hostile, and it's not really your fault, everyone is different. good luck and I hope you enjoy watching your Superman film again.

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Okay, a single flaw. It's a Superman movie that's two and half hours long.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Letting his father die instead of saving him and telling people afterwards "They were stressed beyond belief and don't know what they saw."

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can't. It's literally perfect in every way.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was directed by Zack Snyder.

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >rushed
    started off good then after getting the superman costume, it goes full capeshit
    unique kino fight scenes of a combination of super speed and super strength

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My biggest gripe is how Jonathan Kent's death was handled. Other than that, the movie lays a decent foundation for future films, but Cavill never really evolved into the final form of what Superman is supposed to be.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the scripts and storys were dogshit, how could he? he did very well with what he had and bad direction from a guy who wanted to bend the concept of superman around the film he wanted to make, not bring forth the best version of superman on film he could. It was made as a setup for future films, except he went HAM on the fighting to the point that that was the peak of the entire DC universe for super-hero combat.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      your biggest gripe should be that superman thinks saving people is a burden. but that would require not being a cynical, amoral narcissist

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But Superman doesn't think that. Show us the dialogue where he states that.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Its because he felt the burden of people dying.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he whines about the burden of needing to save them, not them dying

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah because its nit good or whatever if they die. He is a pessimist
              FRICK SNYDER i want my fun superman back

  29. 4 weeks ago
    CreepyThinMan

    >Name a single flaw in this movie

    It exists!!!FACT!!!

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This entire scene is so contrived and shows exactly why Snyder sucks so much as a director.
    >Tornado comes out of literally fricking nowhere
    >Pa Kent has to go ahead and wave people towards the bridge who are already running towards the bridge
    >Pa Kent has to help a woman get her child out of the car for some reason
    >Pa Kent has to help the dog get out because everyone else forgot it for some reason even though they were sitting right next to it
    >Pa Kent gets his foot stuck in the door for no reason other than for the dog to get away

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >dog initially freaks out and tries to hide in the car instead of get out, forcing Pa to spend more time hanging around and getting into the car
      >but then once Pa is in there it has no problem running out of the car, instead of seeking out his human to protect him
      Should at least have had the dog die whimpering next to Pa in the car, with Pa unable to just run and leave it behind and the car being smashed out of nowhere.

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    constant fricking shaky cam

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's for adult children who never grew out of this nonsense. Superhero movies are boring.

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Henry Cavill wasn't having uninhibited gay sex with me

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Finally a decent answer

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Brokeback Mountain remake starring him and Hemsworth soon

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The main character is wh*te.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can’t

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only good part was an IHOP getting destroyed. Frick ihop.

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lois teleporting. Also applies to BvS.I think she's actually Martian Manhunter, but I don't think it's confirmed.

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good morning, sir!

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Armond white talks about the man of steel
    >Man of Steel is the first superhero movie to be directed by a real filmmaker since Tim Burton took on Batman in 1989. Director Zack Snyder does more than reboot the past Superman franchises; he immediately gives the subject his signature–something Burton could not do until his second Batman movie, the comic/macabre Batman Returns (1992). Snyder has a grave sense of movement and excitement that is distinctly cinematic which cannot be said of the other directors who essayed previous Superman movies including the tongue-in-cheek Christopher Reeve films, as well as the various Batman flicks, X-Men, Star Wars, Star Trek, Iron Man, Punisher, Electra, Spiderman, Hellboy and Fantastic Four—the entire unsatisfying lot.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Unlike Burton, Snyder’s sensibility derives from comic books and graphic novels yet his visual extravagance also contains the palpably erotic core of comic book fantasy. Snyder immediately invests the Superman story with this tactile realism, a feel for ancient legend: Opening scenes on the dying planet Krypton recall the stylization of 300 but with a slightly futuristic edge that never lapses into conventional superhero movie fantasy. (Snyder got that out of his system with Watchmen.) The arch otherworldliness of Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and his wife Lara Lor-Van (Ayelet Zurer) sending their newborn infant into outer space to survive Krypton’s destruction and preserve their heritage from the tyrannical threat of General Zod (Michael Shannon) also evokes a kind of classicism. It doesn’t play like sci-fi and when the story shifts to planet Earth where the alien boy Kal-El is raised as Clark Kent, Snyder effectively creates a contrasting, charged-up realism.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Kal-El/Clark Kent (played by Henry Cavill) isn’t called “Superman” until late in the story; his history and identity are the film’s real subject. First seen bursting through flames as a Herculean physical specimen, his alien adjustment to Earth and humanity is a personal trial neatly conveyed through screenwriter David S. Goyer’s multiple flashbacks. While Snyder gives the alien’s feats a quality of wonder, Cavil conveys surprise, urgency and torment. Snyder is good at the physics of stress (The Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole is a masterpiece, I promise you) which separates Man of Steel from The Dark Knight trilogy.
        Christopher Nolan (producer on Man of Steel) had a flat, cold directorial style only useful for his trilogy’s cynicism. Snyder’s kinetic pictorialism provides a humane essence (that’s why 300 looked like a comic book and went beyond one) perfectly attuned to make a story about alienation, regret and the struggle to survive a changed environment; it’s moving rather than trendily “dark.” When Kal-El learns his of background, Snyder visualizes the lesson as a bas relief of Krypton’s history: figures emerge like engravings on coins burnished by memory; it’s as amazing as the hieroglyphics sequence in The Prince of Egypt.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Snyder’s consistent intermix of realism and legend upgrades the superhero genre. Cavill’s dramatic handsomeness recalls young Sean Connery’s exotic virility; his simultaneously otherworldly and legendary aspects suit Snyder’s sensuous action style–textured close-ups of skin and capillaries, jet trails in the sky as he flies, his red cape’s heavy swoosh. No previous Superman achieved Cavill’s perfected gesture of drawing back his right hand when flying to exert physical and spiritual will. Converting iconography from District 9, the Transformer films and Independence Day, Snyder improves on the imagery, giving it a speedy, thrilling roughness, preferable to the usual unimaginatively slick CGI.
          What’s terrific here is that Snyder expresses Kal-El’s force, his will. The yearning to understand himself and his human-likeness gives the film depth. When Kal-El meets the earnest newspaper reporter Lois Lane (Amy Adams) their immediate attraction is so well acted it’s deeper than romance. Their passions meet and that’s Snyder and Nolan’s breakthrough. This is the most stirring, impassioned superhero movie I’ve ever seen.

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pacing

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its capeshit

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it relied too much on being capeshit
    it should have been like joker, not in tone, but as in have him be a real life person

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    None, it's a masterpiece. Frick the haters.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >cast henry cavill as superman
    >no autistic manschild depiction of superman having to balance saving the world with painting his warhammer minis
    We were robbed of true kino

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Faora not marrying me.

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would superman be jacked? If nothing he lifts ever provides any resistance, shouldnt he have just a completely average body?
    Just some average 6'1" guy who when he pulls down his bangs and puts on thick glasses can pull off being a complete nerd seemlessly.
    Batman should be the 6'4" gigachad meme, some hulking bro who at the same time is stealthy as all frick.
    Now that would've been a BvS depiction I could get behind

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because of Earth's nourishing environment and particularly the sun. He becomes sickly when he isn't in contact with it for a long time or is exposed to a red sun.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *