One? That's easy. They turned Bruce's love interest into an old lady. At least he ends up with the best of the three in the third movie but that's a definite flaw of the second.
It looked like Lower Manhattan in Batman Begins, which is canonically what Gotham is supposed to look like. >Gotham is Manhattan below Canal Street on the coldest night in November.
Brandon Gleeson, John Hurt, Paul Bettany, Rufus Sewell (mogged gay Ledger in his own movie), Jack Nicholson, Guy Pierce, Colin Firth and Peter Jackson in Hot Fuzz
>The fans who legitimately think this is the greatest movie ever made.
True >The guy who played joker’s histrionic performance.
Garbage take never mind
homosexual dies of drug abuse and is considered a great actor because of it. You really fell for that meme dumbass
I tried to watch the other day I couldn't. Cape shit, no matter how dark you try to portray it(which possible exceptions like Watchmen), is still very childish. Dialogues are pretty bad, acting is mediocre, most of the time over the top, and the story is kinda boring.
So yeah, the only reason why this film got such acclaim is because of Heath Ledger's death. Sad but true.
>So yeah, the only reason why this film got such acclaim is because of Heath Ledger's death. Sad but true.
It's true. No one gave a frick about Batman Begins, never once heard anyone talk about it when it was new. Not even kids. It's sad how Ledger's death turned the fricking Joker of all characters into THE big role that every wanker in the world sees a talented actor and is like "*gasp* he should be le joker baby!" It's cringe as shit.
I used to bash this film but after everything that has come after it this stands as unbridled kino. We will never get Batman movies this good again.
For me it's Batman/Batman Returns and The Nolan Trilogy for the ultimate Batkino.
I tried to watch the other day I couldn't. Cape shit, no matter how dark you try to portray it(which possible exceptions like Watchmen), is still very childish. Dialogues are pretty bad, acting is mediocre, most of the time over the top, and the story is kinda boring.
So yeah, the only reason why this film got such acclaim is because of Heath Ledger's death. Sad but true.
The Joker has a wormhole, which allows him to move men, guns, money, explosives, barrels of gasoline, and whatever else he wants anywhere in the city within seconds of it being needed.
Once you realize this, you see how lazy this capeshit film really is.
All clowns irl have access to the same pocket dimension.
It's how they keep all that tied ribbon in their stomachs, and pull flowers out of nowhere, and fish coins from the back of your ears.
The Dark Knight was an accurate hypothetical of what would happen if one of them ever used this power against us.
Its a better crime flick with a better acted villain. Begins is comfy, but a bit more comic booky in the classic sense, while tdk is more 'gritty realism' in the capeshit sense.
A clown is making terrorism in the us and no one is doing anything to stop him, is it a plan to guilt china? In the Dark Knight Rises, Bane is doing the same thing, Where the frick was Obama? Shit movie and Batman Begins is the real KINO.
Why does no one come into the bank once they start robbing it? It must have taken at least half an hour for the guy to fill all the bags with money and drag them to the lobby. Why do the cops show up one second after the bus leaves?
Kek contrarians are so horrible. You had to be there. There hadn't been a single comic movie performance even close to Ledger's. There was criticism that he wasn't "crazy" enough to play Joker. Then the first trailer came out and it blew everyone's mind. Nobody expected him to be that good, that realistic, serious and passionate. Comic movies were no longer kiddie shit, they were at least YA level with a very interesting looking performance from Ledger. There was still optimism and interest for future left in society. You had to be there.
the "some men just want to watch the world burn" scene. because it is the perfect evidence for just how committed nolan's films are to casting anyone resisting oppressive systems as villains.
first of all, alfred can only have been in Myanmar as part of the british colonialists who occupied the country for over 100 years. and their motivation for "trying to buy the loyalty of the tribal leaders" would have been to get them under british colonial powers and influence. but this manipulation tactic is being sabotaged by a "bandit" who is giving the precious stones to the people.
now framing the actions of a revolutionary who is resisting british imperial powers and redistributing hoarded wealth to the people as "just [watching] the world burn" seems a little bit... evil? (not to mention that nowhere did alfred point to anything harmful the bandit did besides depriving the government of their leverage over the people (which, if that's all it takes to make someone evil in the nolanverse, then yikes.))
and then alfred lists the way you can tell if someone is illogical. 1. they aren't looking for money; they can't be bought. 2. they can't be bullied. (as though trying to manipulate people with them is somehow logical and safe?) 3. they can't be reasoned or negotiated with. (in this instance of course this frames the british colonialists as the "reasonable" ones and acts as though any "negotiations" they offer would be honest or safe.)
but then comes the most famous and most baffling line. "some men just want to watch the world burn." how? HOW?? how is what the "bandit" doing burning the world or watching the world burn or anything other than resisting an occupying colonial force?? and then later in the film, when alfred finally explains how they caught the "bandit," he says "we burned the forest down." who did? alfred. and the other british colonialists. they were not only the men watching the world burn; they were the ones burning it. and look who he blames. frick.
Alfred was the rebel, it was him projecting his guilty conscience onto a 'mysterious, unseen third-party' foiling his attempts at subjugating the locals. Joker was the tangerine.
That's what I'm saying, moron. But 'Alfred' didn't give niglet Joker the ruby, 'the bandit' did. Which is meant to be the jaw-dropping moment when you realise that Alfred was the bandit all along.
The Dark Knight's ending is about "it's ok for the government to deceive its people to keep them in line." Frick the whole movie is like that. "Noooo you can't kill this wallstreet frick to save hundreds of people getting treated for cancer, protect him o brave police!" "Noooo you have to tolerate this vigilante inspiring a crimewave because the Commissioner likes him!" "Noooo you can't kill prisoners to save citizens that's against the law and therefore you all feel it to be morally wrong as well!"
Alfred was the rebel, it was him projecting his guilty conscience onto a 'mysterious, unseen third-party' foiling his attempts at subjugating the locals. Joker was the tangerine.
Joker was actually the kid he gave the ruby to. Alfred literally funded the Joker, which is why he was so distraught about Bruce facing him.
>tvtropes >reddit
Perhaps you'd feel more at home somewhere else.
Batman reflecting off the wall instead of a mad cheap skid
>Batman reflecting off the wall instead of a mad cheap skid
One? That's easy. They turned Bruce's love interest into an old lady. At least he ends up with the best of the three in the third movie but that's a definite flaw of the second.
boring ass gotham, looks like chicago
Do you need something like this lol?
Schumacher's Gotham is okay, it's his costuming that awful. Everyone is dressed like a children's birthday party entertainer.
neo-gothpunk futurism
vgh
Legitimately the best part of those movies was how he made the city itself look.
It was mostly filmed in Chicago, as was Batman Begins.
Far, far better than Nolan's Gotham.
And that’s a good thing.
Everything is too clean and boxy
Would you prefer the style of the Joker (2019) instead?
It looked like Lower Manhattan in Batman Begins, which is canonically what Gotham is supposed to look like.
>Gotham is Manhattan below Canal Street on the coldest night in November.
Maggie Gyllenhall, boring and filled with plot holes, overrated and very dumb movie in general
You reckon it's truetom stopped Katie from being in a sequel?
She was filming Momma Mia
the final fight feels too convoluted and kinda cheap, it lasts longer than it should be, that's all
Batman's ridiculous voice
>Your peanut butter'll sell forever!
>Maybe we could share one.
The entire cast except for Bale, Caine, and Oldman.
90% of the script.
50% of the plot, especially the turbo-moronic ending.
Eckhart was also great to be fair.
Well ok. I'll give you Eckhart.
the movie peaks with Joker's first appearance
nah he was too boyish for the role. I don't think the character was well conceived by the script but Eckart didn't sell it well anyways.
Ummm you forgot about someone
homosexual dies of drug abuse and is considered a great actor because of it. You really fell for that meme dumbass
Then who you consider as good actor?
Brandon Gleeson, John Hurt, Paul Bettany, Rufus Sewell (mogged gay Ledger in his own movie), Jack Nicholson, Guy Pierce, Colin Firth and Peter Jackson in Hot Fuzz
All shitters who never gave a performance as good as Ledger's Joker. Sorry homosexual.
Imagine being this gay. Go back to your Arcane general rectal cave enthusiast
we both know you had that typed out and ready to go kek
Terrible actor. Awful Joker.
The fans who legitimately think this is the greatest movie ever made. The guy who played joker’s histrionic performance. It’s a fricking Batman movie
>The fans who legitimately think this is the greatest movie ever made.
True
>The guy who played joker’s histrionic performance.
Garbage take never mind
>So yeah, the only reason why this film got such acclaim is because of Heath Ledger's death. Sad but true.
It's true. No one gave a frick about Batman Begins, never once heard anyone talk about it when it was new. Not even kids. It's sad how Ledger's death turned the fricking Joker of all characters into THE big role that every wanker in the world sees a talented actor and is like "*gasp* he should be le joker baby!" It's cringe as shit.
Didn't adequately explore the character of Dunnheir
die.
no one mentioned the godawful editing yet, but jesus christ does it deserve a mention.
Too many important off screen characters that remained undeveloped. Mi Nao, Adrian Kerr and so on.
How often doies feige watch it
Not enough if he still can't make a movie that would be as good as TDK
I used to bash this film but after everything that has come after it this stands as unbridled kino. We will never get Batman movies this good again.
For me it's Batman/Batman Returns and The Nolan Trilogy for the ultimate Batkino.
I tried to watch the other day I couldn't. Cape shit, no matter how dark you try to portray it(which possible exceptions like Watchmen), is still very childish. Dialogues are pretty bad, acting is mediocre, most of the time over the top, and the story is kinda boring.
So yeah, the only reason why this film got such acclaim is because of Heath Ledger's death. Sad but true.
.
>actual supermodel vs Ben Quadinaros looking hag
wtf were they THINKING?
>Actual actress vs Tom Cruise's boring beard
What indeed.
The shit with putting the bullet back together from the wall to get a finger print lol
RACHEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLL
Canonically she just hit the wall really hard
Prime Katie Holmes was so perfect bros
Hand-to-hand combat scenes didn’t age well and look shit
Nolan is awful in hand-to-hand action, should learn from Snyder
Making Joker a troony
It's not Marvel.
The Joker has a wormhole, which allows him to move men, guns, money, explosives, barrels of gasoline, and whatever else he wants anywhere in the city within seconds of it being needed.
Once you realize this, you see how lazy this capeshit film really is.
All clowns irl have access to the same pocket dimension.
It's how they keep all that tied ribbon in their stomachs, and pull flowers out of nowhere, and fish coins from the back of your ears.
The Dark Knight was an accurate hypothetical of what would happen if one of them ever used this power against us.
Begins was
>comfier
>Better Gotham
>hot Rachel
>less capeshitty
Remind me why TDK is supposed to be the high point of the trilogy again?
Its a better crime flick with a better acted villain. Begins is comfy, but a bit more comic booky in the classic sense, while tdk is more 'gritty realism' in the capeshit sense.
I will never watch these movies because Christian Bale's batman voice is so terrible
no flaw but it set the bar too high for blockbusters
A clown is making terrorism in the us and no one is doing anything to stop him, is it a plan to guilt china? In the Dark Knight Rises, Bane is doing the same thing, Where the frick was Obama? Shit movie and Batman Begins is the real KINO.
moron, they literally sent in the National Guard to stop Joker
bullet in the wall
school bus escape
Grimdark.
I can’t
Nolan couldn’t decide if Joker’s name is Amanda Mywerd or Strein Jerr, and so both those names end up in the same script. Giant plothole.
The people on the boats don't even mention Batman or the midnight deadline.
Why does no one come into the bank once they start robbing it? It must have taken at least half an hour for the guy to fill all the bags with money and drag them to the lobby. Why do the cops show up one second after the bus leaves?
>Cinemaphile is pretending Maggie Gyllenhall wasn’t hot in this again
Kek contrarians are so horrible. You had to be there. There hadn't been a single comic movie performance even close to Ledger's. There was criticism that he wasn't "crazy" enough to play Joker. Then the first trailer came out and it blew everyone's mind. Nobody expected him to be that good, that realistic, serious and passionate. Comic movies were no longer kiddie shit, they were at least YA level with a very interesting looking performance from Ledger. There was still optimism and interest for future left in society. You had to be there.
test
Joker and Dent nurse cringer scene
Joker plot armour
the "some men just want to watch the world burn" scene. because it is the perfect evidence for just how committed nolan's films are to casting anyone resisting oppressive systems as villains.
first of all, alfred can only have been in Myanmar as part of the british colonialists who occupied the country for over 100 years. and their motivation for "trying to buy the loyalty of the tribal leaders" would have been to get them under british colonial powers and influence. but this manipulation tactic is being sabotaged by a "bandit" who is giving the precious stones to the people.
now framing the actions of a revolutionary who is resisting british imperial powers and redistributing hoarded wealth to the people as "just [watching] the world burn" seems a little bit... evil? (not to mention that nowhere did alfred point to anything harmful the bandit did besides depriving the government of their leverage over the people (which, if that's all it takes to make someone evil in the nolanverse, then yikes.))
and then alfred lists the way you can tell if someone is illogical. 1. they aren't looking for money; they can't be bought. 2. they can't be bullied. (as though trying to manipulate people with them is somehow logical and safe?) 3. they can't be reasoned or negotiated with. (in this instance of course this frames the british colonialists as the "reasonable" ones and acts as though any "negotiations" they offer would be honest or safe.)
but then comes the most famous and most baffling line. "some men just want to watch the world burn." how? HOW?? how is what the "bandit" doing burning the world or watching the world burn or anything other than resisting an occupying colonial force?? and then later in the film, when alfred finally explains how they caught the "bandit," he says "we burned the forest down." who did? alfred. and the other british colonialists. they were not only the men watching the world burn; they were the ones burning it. and look who he blames. frick.
Idiot. Joker WAS that Rebel.
Alfred was the rebel, it was him projecting his guilty conscience onto a 'mysterious, unseen third-party' foiling his attempts at subjugating the locals. Joker was the tangerine.
Joker was actually the kid he gave the ruby to. Alfred literally funded the Joker, which is why he was so distraught about Bruce facing him.
That's what I'm saying, moron. But 'Alfred' didn't give niglet Joker the ruby, 'the bandit' did. Which is meant to be the jaw-dropping moment when you realise that Alfred was the bandit all along.
The Dark Knight's ending is about "it's ok for the government to deceive its people to keep them in line." Frick the whole movie is like that. "Noooo you can't kill this wallstreet frick to save hundreds of people getting treated for cancer, protect him o brave police!" "Noooo you have to tolerate this vigilante inspiring a crimewave because the Commissioner likes him!" "Noooo you can't kill prisoners to save citizens that's against the law and therefore you all feel it to be morally wrong as well!"
>tvtropes
>reddit
Perhaps you'd feel more at home somewhere else.
The gatekeeping never let ups, does it?
Capeshit
I cant
its capeshit
But it's not
Surprised jannies didn't delete or archive this like 90% of threads.