Name the show and character(s) this would've worked with
>inb4 just look up r34
Very true. But something about the the idea of official nudes for shows fascinates me.
Name the show and character(s) this would've worked with. >inb4 just look up r34. Very true.
basically ANY show meant for children. It's a double edged sword though because the bad publicity would probably lead to the show being cancelled
it's just nudity. everybody is naked sometime. we're not asking to see them with a footlong dildo crammed into an orifice, just the body as god made it.
instead of her clothes, how much to take off her nostril corners, jowl lines, and other somewhat poor drawing choices. how much to lift her navel up a bit? what if drawing real eyes instead of pingpong balls.
I don’t think you know what jowls are
>as god made it
>implying a religious authoritarian exists
works for wakfu and thats a show for toddlers
French shows are kind of cheating in that sense though.
>t. candy caramella
The modern French are fricked in the head. Possibly the results of all the heads that got choped.
Wakfu also stars a Goddess that was raped by a dark entity, which then birthed something I don't recall.
What's wrong with Bobbypills?
I think "Incredible" would like a word with you.
explain
groomer
I ain't saying I recommend it. I know I wouldn't
What about older children's shows? Ones that haven't aired in years and the only people who remember them are in their 20's and 30's?
I got you covered.
>another adult show that can show people being gored but not nudity.
You people always say this but b***h at Big Mouth.
>why don't you like the thing that was purposefully drawn to be as ugly as possible that is also on characters who are minors?
Tell me you're not serious.
Big Mouth is israeli trash, and they think we'd like to see what they're really thinking. That's the tragedy of it.
*priveleged upper-class
got them a bunch of seasons and a spinoff. meanwhile youve got diabetes and still know nothing about sex. i think theyre better off not listening to "people" like you
>Hmm?? Child nudity not GOOD enough for you?
she fricked a donkey
I would’ve followed them if they drew that instead
It's best to commission another talented artist instead.
I swear she seems like a prostitute.
But as i fast forward through every ep again.
I see her shove statue of liberty up her pussy (could be faking) for commercial.
And hot lesbian sex with hottest woman alive.
There was something disgusting?
Was that just a lie or story?
She's kinda basic, her hips, boobs, and butt are too small.
She's semi hot?
But maybe like a 7 out of 10?
Why would her naked be worth it?
I forgot ep 9 daddy issues.
She "got intimate" with a wild dirty guy.
And threw herself down stairs to not get pregnant.
The guy was a bear, that had it's fur fall off.
Time to research beer genitals size i guess.
Not that anyone cares, black bears is small, grizzly is big.
Why was i only one that did bear dick research?...
Didn't King Zog frick a bear?
powerpuff girls 2016 reboot with ms bellum
The writers already predicted Gina thirst.
Francine, most of the females from Archer, Clone High chicks. Maybe Scooby Doo or Flintstones too, both of these series are so long running that it's kind of surprising that there was never an attempt to do something raunchy especially Flintstone since it started off as an Adult comedy.
Technically the Simpsons did it first with Marge on Playboy.
Seth McFarlane has wanted to do a raunchy Flintstones for forever now, and the less said about Velma the better.
Also in terms of Velma, see:
I heard it was the other way around, he wanted to do a regular Flintstones and it fell through because the network wanted him to make it a Family Guy clone.
It'd be easier for the Flintstones if it didn't become solely engrained as toddler icons with cereal and vitamins. If those 2 things didn't exist it'd be far more open to reinterpretation. They were willing to try anyway with a McFarlane reboot but I think it was he himself who didn't like the idea and stopped. Though I doubt it'd have been too raunchy.
Why do all adult cartoons look like shit
minimizes the animation budget so it goes to the rest of the staff (VA and Producers) and makes the network happy since they can make shit pennies on the dollar so they're guaranteed to profit
So they can say its "just jokes" instead of having to admit cartoons make their peepee hard.
Crumb had no shame, yet people still admire his work.
That's really elaborate though
because cartoons are for children
ok velma
youre always welcome to prove me wrong if you can without lying
that was remarkably easy
>posts a childrens movie
>for children
Fine, let's get adult.
lets
I liked Vermins more.
artists arent paid to care about what you like
Unless I'm the one with a studio.
Anime would very probably do it for free with a far more appealing character design. Cartoon fanservice is so ugly it's honestly depressing.
Dr. Ivo Robotnik is hot tho.
>ugly characters
>shit animation
>shit writing
>rule 34 means it's good