>thighs wobble but the ass it motionless like a carapace >convenient lack of hair in a visor
>Cell phones with cameras get made >Cryptid reports fricking vanish
I knew they were all probably hoaxes anyway, but there was always that little faint hope they MIGHT'VE been real. It's kind of saddening bros. Feels like there's less magic in the world than there used to be.
Analog's better suited for it, no pixels to alter.
effect guy fancies himself a biology expert >not a single credible report of such a creature within biologist circles
So you just made the argument that Bigfoot does not and has never existed.
It's clearly real and there are many real videos of others, from all over, America, Russia. More and more all the time. There are fakes too but they are mostly easy enough to distinguish between the two. Most people just can't think for themselves and are waiting for muh authority to declare that it's real.
Care to link some of those other videos you consider real?
I'm skeptical of that because there's a youtube bigfoot community that doesn't do much other than endlessly analyze and re-analyze the Patterson Gimlin footage, you'd think they'd be eager to have some other good material to work with
To me the funniest part of this is not the wojak itself, but rather that someone was so assblasted over being constantly called out for his bullshit that they had to make this
I know you cultist brainwashed morons don’t think that being debunked is real, but people in the real world (and are at least somewhat intelligent) know that truth is a very important value to hold to keep your sanity.
You fricking have to stop closing your eyes and ears to the world around you. Unless you are literally a toddler.
>Too grainy to make out any specific features, features that people claim to see are pareidolia at best, disingenuous at worst >Plenty of people can replicate the walk despite what people say >Patterson went out in a cowboy costume to film a bigfoot movie and just coincidentally found one, he filmed a bigfoot movie with no apparent bigfoot costume >He drew and collected stories about bigfoot and even published a book 8 years prior to the sighting claiming it was real, and got ridiculed for it >Freaked out when gimlin raised a gun towards it, urged him not to fire >Gimlin even doubts it was real now
This motherfricker doesn't even walk right. He does a little arm swing, turns his head, and mouthbreathers call it spot on. But he doesn't even bend his knees high enough. His stride isn't long enough. His arms don't reach the same length on his leg as the bigfoot. It's so blatant to anyone with eyes, that if you really think the two are one in the same based on what you see, I firmly believe you should be declared legally blind.
He claims despite their friendship, Roger wasn't above lying to him about finances and even used his name when taking out a loan on the camera equipment they used.
He says its not much of a stretch that patterson could've paid a guy in a suit considering they were supposed to shoot a movie about bigfoot and one just suddenly appeared, roger assumed gimlin wasn't carrying ammunition.
>Roger wasn't above lying to him about finances and even used his name when taking out a loan on the camera equipment they used.
Roger Patterson also put his horse infront of gimlin raising his weapon to prevent him shooting it, which raises some red flags for me.
He was really dead set on the thing walking out of sight for some unexplained reason, despite Gimlin having several chances at a clean shot.
>meanwhile considers himself a biology expert
Do any apes have hairy bimbo breasts like this in the wild? asking for a friend
>>Too grainy to make out any specific features, features that people claim to see are pareidolia at best, disingenuous at worst
you can clearly see its saggy breasts as it turns around, a detail that probably wouldn't be included if it was fake
You forget that Patterson threatened legal action when William Roe's daughter tried to publish her late father's story that just happened to be eerily similar to how the PGF encounter happened.
Patterson was quite happy to protect the financial incentives of bigfoot, didn't really care about actually looking into it further.
I have this autistic theory that people in the past all had a basic level of art skill that today we think is "good" but was considered standard back then, and I think it's because of the way art was taught in school. So what the average person who completed high school could draw back then is better than most deviantart artists today.
first, nice trips. second, it's not as autistic as you think. animation schools used to teach animators how to simulate body weight. i don't know if i still have the jpg but richard williams, head animator on shit like roger rabbitt, literally btfo the entire calarts academy with a simple demonstration because they stopped teaching it
>He drew and collected stories about bigfoot and even published a book 8 years prior to the sighting claiming it was real, and got ridiculed for it
Fricking bullshit, he'd have been called out instantly. >Look it up >It's real
What the frick
>He drew and collected stories about bigfoot and even published a book 8 years prior to the sighting claiming it was real, and got ridiculed for it
Fricking bullshit, he'd have been called out instantly. >Look it up >It's real
What the frick
This just proves to me he was quite happy to profit off of bigfoot, so why not make the hoax
That, or he genuinely wanted to make a bigfoot movie, recorded the suit, and then figured "hey, this looks legitimate, we could make a killing off of this" and ditched the movie idea (and subsequently, the suit)
The walk always seemed like bigfoot was in really big shoes and couldn't quite walk right with obstacles like branches and rocks on the floor
or like a diver wearing diving flippers
No but this is a good comparison between male/female. Look at the left, at trump, straight back, small posterior. NOw look at the right, slightly hunched foward posture, bulbous posterior. That's a female bigfoot.
I choose to believe its real because its more fun to believe its real and despite the video video being put under extreme scrutiny for 50 years its still been unable to be proved as fake.
>Bigfoot believers, explain, why isn’t there a single bigfoot bone?
There are tons of bones out there. People just don't bother to pick them up, especially when they're all gross and rotted, just like with other animal carcasses/bodyparts. Covered in bugs and goop and dirt. I ain't touching the shit, and neither are you. It's probably just a moose bone anyway.
If you think its real why do you think there's never been a video that good since? Do you think it was just a small amount of them in the pacific northwest and they went extinct?
>If you think its real why do you think there's never been a video that good since?
Not him, but I've taken the liberty of providing in my opinion some of the best videos out there that deserve the same level of scrutiny as the Patterson film.
I am open to the idea of sasquatch existing, or rather having existed but potentially now being extinct or on the verge of it but I absolutely do not believe the bullshit about them being 7+ feet tall
I think if you saw a large, wild, unknown ape that was human height you'd just imagine them being really tall
This is the biggest smoking gun in my opinion, she's like six foot. >Patterson says shes 7'5" >Gimlin, who was there, gives multiple interviews seperately saying she was around 6 foot, and that he's seen men taller >Patterson urges gimlin to not talk to the media anymore until Patterson's early death
Its not some hulking beast which to me makes it more plausible being a person in a suit
Alot of people seemingly forget they did take plaster casts of the feet that were determined to be completely fake (Patterson did say that someone was stomping around in bigfoot fake shoes to try to discredit him)
>they did take plaster casts of the feet that were determined to be completely fake
When were these taken? I assume very soon after the movie was filmed, since those footprints wouldn't last intact for long, so how could people have found out about the exact place it happened and gone and stomped around in big shoes before they went to take prints of them?
If this was one photo, I'd say its fake as frick. But the fact that there's two, and there's visible movement between the two from everything from the musculature in the arm, to the facial expression with its nose and lips and eyes, to the repositioning of its feet and its entire posture. If it's a statue (like some people say it's one from a Ripley's museum), there'd have to be two (unlikely) or it would have be articulated in a very advanced way (unlikely). If it was a costume to accommodate all of that, it was a very advanced and complicated costume, oscar-worthy special effects, wasted on two photos and that's it. The Myakka photos are the best evidence, hands down.
that'd make sense that is what a "skunk ape" would be
a great ape species in north america would probably be most likely related to the orangutan lineage that crossed over to north america across the bering strait as there were orangutan relatives, that we know of, up to china
This is so much more believable, not just all the evidence in the photos but that it was never really presented as some bigfoot-type thing where we know a ton about it but somehow never actually see one. It could totally be some feral zoo animal or a government experiment.
Frick that shit. I want a bigfoot action movie. I want to see Bigfoot fight a clan of ninjas and rescue the president or some shit. Bigfoot as the villain monster is so overplayed.
There isn't enough detail in the film to prove it isn't a man in a suit. You can't prove a negative under any circumstance anyway. For me, the best information from the film comes from the anatomy of what we see about the skull. If that was a suit for a person to fit inside, they would have to be standing on stilts because a human skull couldn't fit inside the head piece. That's a sagital crest on top; similar to a gorilla's. If you put a person in a suit like that, lower than the top of the head, the elbows and knees would look awkward and misaligned relative to the head. The creature in the film moves fluidly, and there's even a sports hernia on the right thigh. If it's a suit, it's the best ape suit ever constructed.
>The creature in the film moves fluidly, and there's even a sports hernia on the right thigh.
Fricking lmao
you mean a crease in the suit that is too wide in the thigh?
also according to this,
She's quite tiny for one of her species
(5'11" guy for scale)
The suit doesn't seem that big at all height wise.
>it's the best ape suit ever constructed.
The fact it isn't in good quality sure does help it alot. The bad camera hides alot of the worst aspects of the suit.
Any comment on why the bottoms of the feet are different sizes and completely solid rectangles aside from moulding for the toes, or?
>Cameras go HD >Bigfoot sightings on video vanish
hmm, noticing a pattern that happens with UFOs too
I would love to believe in bigfoot but the suit videos really dont help.
The issue of the 'flat foot' would seem to be consistent with bigfoot footprints. Them dudes got big ol' flat feet. They're big and heavy. Their feet would likely become flat and arch less to support their weight.
The neck turns in the film. If the helmet had an extra few inches on top, the head would look too tall relative to the neck when it turns toward the camera.
> You can't prove a negative under any circumstance anyway.
This is false. This hackney saying only applies to a very specific form of the scientific method no one uses.
Of course I can prove a negative.
For example,I can prove there is not a real elephant in my room after looking for one.
When using all the normal definitions of “elephant” and “in my room”
What gives me pause is that the maker of an ape suit that complex wouldn’t have come out of nowhere and vanished again. Serious people in the costuming world and maybe monster movie fandom back then would have known at a glance who made it. Enthusiasts recognize these things.
Why do you think it's a complex suit? it really isn't, the film quality is hiding alot of the imperfections and finer details that we'd immediately see if it was shot with a decent camera.
Just look at the examples in this thread - some people pointing out the ass looks sewed shut, some people pointing out the crease in the suit's leg bowing inward, some people pointing out the flat rubber boots on the bottoms of the soles, some people pointing to what looks like a belt in the middle of the costume.
All these could be paredolia too, but its a far simpler observation than it's a real complex suit.
People attribute the suit's complex design to ONE costume designer on planet of the apes who said it's too difficult, whilst they tend to ignore several others who also worked on planet of the apes who insisted it's completely doable, and their issue was not being able to use real animal furs, which the suit in the footage obviously has tacked onto the suit.
Patterson himself was a bit of a craftsman and artist, and knew how to taxidermy and draw anatomically correct apes.
Why not? Patterson drew bigfoot with breasts 8 years before the encounter.
He's a good artist btw, should have stuck with that.
Many special effects creators have viewed the film. They always say it's quality is unlike anything that could be produced in the 60s, 70s, even 80s. I just can't get over the skull size issue. A human skull simply will not fit in there AND have the elbows, knees, and neck in the proportionally correct places.
>Many special effects creators have viewed the film. They always say it's quality is unlike anything that could be produced in the 60s, 70s, even 80s
Commonly misattributed to one guy working on planet of the apes, of which there were many special effects artists that said it COULD be replicated. >I just can't get over the skull size issue
It's called a football helmet.
>A human skull simply will not fit in there AND have the elbows, knees, and neck in the proportionally correct places.
see
She's quite tiny for one of her species
(5'11" guy for scale)
Lines up pretty well proportionally imo, its not like you see patty's hands move at all either, meaning you can lengthen the forearms as much as you like if you really wanted to.
You make valid arguments to my post. I can appreciate the validity of your reasoning. But I still have difficulty with human head inside the helmet. The neck appears to turn in such a way that the head is in perfect proportion to the body. There is also speculation about which lense was being used on the camera that shot the film. But That's far to long a discussion for the basket weaving forum. My final point is this: the footage is interesting. Not because it proves anything, but because it has the potential to be authentic. I suppose I wish to believe that it is genuine. Maybe that's a flaw in my reasoning, but I enjoy a good mystery. I enjoy the debate, the speculation, and hearing all the arguments. It's thought provoking and I've always like that about unexplained shit. The footage exists. And I've enjoyed many years of research and investigation into paranormal things. I just think it's cool to wonder about possibilities.
>I suppose I wish to believe that it is genuine.
Same, believe it or not I'm not actually a skeptic, I just think there's far better evidence elsewhere. Everything about Patterson was fraudulent, and I don't think its wise to give him the benefit of the doubt considering he was in the business of deceptions for years before AND after this.
If bigfoot was real it would be amazing. The Patterson film is, as you said, interesting. But everything about it could be replicated by a human, and for patterson's reputation, its just a far more likelier outcome.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I agree. I'm a skeptical anon myself. But I always bend toward possibilities. I have become convinced that our world is a strange place, and it would be supremely foolish of us to think we could ever understand everything. I embrace the the mysteries, and work toward learning ever more about them. Even if I encounter clever hoaxes along the way. I simply love knowing that there's always more to learn and new frontiers to explore. Always keep an open mind; but not so open that your brain falls out.
If Bigfoots are real then why have we never found any body parts or bones from them? If they were real you'd think we'd have physical evidence of their existence by now.
You know how domesticated hogs turn feral after a generation or two in the wild? How they grow corse hair and tusks and get larger? I have a theory that humans might react the same way. What if there were some isolated pockets of feral humans (in large forested areas, national parks, cave systems, etc.) that live in remote places? They might regress into physical morphology better suited for life in wilderness. >Larger size >Increased hair >Greater physical strength
It might explain some of those Missing 411 cases.
Also know that humans have some biological similarly with pigs; at least as far as organ structure and function. I don't think it would take many generations of maybe twenty humans living on the frontier of civilization to move into extremely remote areas, and then disregard language and society altogether in exchange for living as creatures of the land. The implications of such a move backwards as to call up dormant genes we once used for survival in the distant past. Our genetics remember...
Furthermore, the frontier of North America was a BIG place between the 18th and 19th century. It would be easy to lose yourself to... More private ways of survival.
Also know that humans have some biological similarly with pigs; at least as far as organ structure and function. I don't think it would take many generations of maybe twenty humans living on the frontier of civilization to move into extremely remote areas, and then disregard language and society altogether in exchange for living as creatures of the land. The implications of such a move backwards as to call up dormant genes we once used for survival in the distant past. Our genetics remember...
Furthermore, the frontier of North America was a BIG place between the 18th and 19th century. It would be easy to lose yourself to... More private ways of survival.
except there are amazon tribes that live with little outside contact, and the North Sentilese that live with utterly no contact, and they are not like that.
Then there are stories of children who have lived with wolves
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_child
Yeah, maybe not completely in that span of time. But I'm assuming that if a small group of people either chose or were forced to leave civilization, they may not have had a good grasp of spoken or written words in the first place. After a few generations in the wilderness, it would become easier to point, vocalize, etc. Rather than speak.
"Bigfoots" has never, will never, and cannot be the theory. People have never argued for the existence of anything but THE Bigfoot, those who try to "rationalize" or provide evidence otherwise are legit disinfo trying to confuse and obfuscate the truth. Our two most reliable pieces of evidence for Bigfoot(Teddy Roosevelt and the OP film) both only show THE singular Bigfoot. It's because the only logical conclusion is that Bigfoot is an entity that cannot be killed, captured, harmed, and is immortal and possibly ethereal that they try to make it seem not so. But if you sit down and read the evidence it's clear this is the case
i live in a remote part of north America in a mountainous and heavily forested area and I feed and interact with bigfeet and they trust me to keep their identity safe so ive never reported it or taken photos. they're pretty smart, like somewhere in the middle between a gorilla and a black person
i encountered bigfoot in a truck stop bathroom off highway 65 in the winter of 1988. his penis is surprisingly small, but he fricks like his life depends on it
Dom? Sub? HIV poz or no? Circumcised? Was he good at foreplay? Did he wish to remain anonymous? Why wasn't he hibernating in the winter? Is it true he is into feet? How long did he last? Was he anything like his gay sex scene in Harry and the Hendersons or was that a stunt double?
>Cell phones with cameras get made >Cryptid reports fricking vanish
I knew they were all probably hoaxes anyway, but there was always that little faint hope they MIGHT'VE been real. It's kind of saddening bros. Feels like there's less magic in the world than there used to be.
It is well known that Sasquatch emits an electromagnetic field akin to a short-range EMP, of course evidence would become more scarce as there are fewer film cameras around
>Cryptid reports fricking vanish
This is just something you read on reddit and fell for because you're a dumb Black person moron.
Whether you believe them or not, people still report cryptids all the time.
Consider this, as our ability to create hoaxes improves we are more quick to dismiss what might be actual evidence because we have the ability to create a fake version easily.
So even if we have better evidence we aren't going to believe it anyways but that does not make it fake.
Bigfoot is more believable than aliens visiting earth despite how much it’s made fun of. Yes, it’s moronic, but beings from other solar systems whizzing around with jets for some fricking reason requires more leaps of logic
>see any bigfoot/yowie/sasquatch/yeti/hairy man etc. media with a comment section >"They are INTERDIMENSIONAL BEINGS not of this Earth. They are real but only show themselves to those lucky few with ENERGY CONNECTIONS and STRONG AURAS and are here to spread PEACE and LOVE
every time
I literally have to step outside my aura to reply to this because the kid gloves come off to teach ignorance like this. Those who don’t want to learn must BE learned, and so the pitch of reality i’m currently intending with my mind must be lowered to your frequency. Huh. It’s sort of like doing baby speak to a dog or child, but instead of putting on a voice you’re literally lowering your cognition and the dimensions of reality you are perceiving. Not been in the waking world for a while, it’s weird, so… solid, such simple shapes. Thoughts are… chemical, elemental, savage. lll make it brief. I’ve stepped down to your level so that one day you may come up to mine and thank me. Yes, this is the obvious truth of what bigfoot fundamentally is. He’s from a more primitive… let’s say, blank slate state of human perception, before centuries of programming in causal logic, separating subject and object. He doesn’t exist in the way your flaccid little brain thinks things exist, in one space, and in another, and another, in discrete moments in time continually. It’s like asking when zeus goes to the toilet, or what he does in his spare time- he exists in half reverie, in a state of timeless being and multi faceted infinite self contemplation that cant begin to make sense to contingent animals like ourselves- gods enter our world and at least in image form operate on its rules, like moving paintings on air, but these are merely representations of manoeuvres of immaterial willpower and conscious intention which shape our reality and we process these massive changes slower than they really occur by making them events in time. THAT’S what the big monkey is. A construction of our feeble minds for spiritual events happening far beyond the scope of time, we process them with bad computers which render slowly. Hopefully this has enlightened you a bit, i’m off back upstairs.
If you just take people's encounters at face value, bigfoot being an interdimensional being is the most "logical" explanation. The irony is the materialist "lost primate" theories have to ignore like half of all encounters because they don't fit into their paradigm.
My favorite theory is that bigfoots have been enslaved and are used as a sort of biological ATV to do various tasks for some higher alien race. The Bigfeets themselves are dumb and stupid, but have been trained and given some super advanced tech.
In any case, Bigfoot is more likely a moron who is at best neutral, if not outright hostile to humans, not some being meant to bestow hard BBE (Big Bigfoot Energy) to patchouli soaked crystal queen neo-pagan witches.
>to do various tasks for some higher alien race
An advanced alien race would be able to rely on AI and robotics and automation to do all its labor as efficiently as possible, there's no reason they would choose slow unreliable meat slaves instead. Except as a joke I guess
This is just a 21st century materialist human way of looking at things, where we assume the only tech aliens could have or want are very advanced versions of our post-industrial computer based technology. That or Bigfoot is a robot.
this has nothing to do with bigfoot but it seemed like the thread to vent, i spent 100 bucks on a spirit box hoping i could find some ghosties, but so far no luck. even went to a graveyard, should be jam packed with spirits there, but still no phenomena, what a frickin gyp
You're right, that footage of Bigfoot has never been disproven and that makes sóyentists and losers on this board seethe. Bigfoot is real and Earth is hollow and Bigfoot lives inside the Hollow Earth.
Is it just me or is there a resurgence of Bigfoot "culture" and interest in the last 6 or so years? I'm not really sure what caused him to resurface when he was kind of absent from commercialization for awhile. Now every trip I take to any sort of outdoors/wooded destination has t-shirts, mugs, hats, etc. of him. Even in Roswell I found more Bigfoot junk than actual tacky alienshit.
Also what the frick is it with Bigfoot and erotica? This chick(presumably) makes bank off of it. Women cannot help themselves around the BBC(BFC?)
>I'm not really sure what caused him to resurface when he was kind of absent from commercialization for awhile.
There are some kino youtube channels that are genuinely entertaining even if you don't believe in it.
Bob Gymlan and Australian Yowie Witness Reports are my picks
>Bob Gymlan
I like him but his reasoning for bigfoot existing is moronic. >In games of chance in a casino, there's always a small chance of you winning big, that small chance always exists, ergo, bigfoot exists, its just a very small chance of meeting him but its always present
Oh yeah some of his stuff is moronic, where he really shines are the when he reads the accounts people send him.
Also his non cryptid animal attack videos are kino which is how I first found him (Lions of Tsavo)
The one that got me was when he tried to argue that bigfoots used infrasounds to scare people off from finding them.
>there are animals that produce low-frequencies to stun prey and human >that means Bigfoot does it too because... it just does, okay?!
It's like he pulls shit out of his ass to justify why people haven't found anything yet.
I used to believe in bigfoot but I've spent many nights in foothills around Mt Rainier and only found Mountain Lions and Elk.
I've bumped into more drug deals and MAGA types having gay sex than Bigfeet.(fyi BIG gay community doing lots of fricking in the woods near Yelm WA)
Never ever heard a yell or nothing...
I used to believe in bigfoot but I've spent many nights in foothills around Mt Rainier and only found Mountain Lions and Elk.
I've bumped into more drug deals and MAGA types having gay sex than Bigfeet.(fyi BIG gay community doing lots of fricking in the woods near Yelm WA)
Never ever heard a yell or nothing...
It may be the best hoax ever produced, I can only really think of the surgeon's photo as rivalling it for how its stood the test of time and like it, will probably only be debunked by someone who was actually involved in the hoax.
Why do motherfrickers always make up bullshit animals like Bigfoot and try to pass them off like they’re some mystery we don’t know about when 70% of the Earth above water has been explored and mapped out, you really want us to believe that there’s some missing link between humanity and monkeys hanging out in fricking California and we somehow didn’t find any evidence of it’s existence until the late 60s in the form of a shitty low res grainy film made by two people one of which has all the reason in the world to make shit up about a Bigfoot and the other is a guy who he’s been confirmed to have lied to before, really?
Why not make up something about how there’s prehistoric animals still existing at the bottom of the ocean that we haven’t discovered yet or there’s some spooky cryptid hanging out at the bottom of the Marianas Trench, why make shit up for a landmas we know most things there are to know in places where people can easily point out these things aren’t real instead of setting them at the bottom of the sea which we’ve barely explored?
Yeah in a fricking jungle like the Amazon Rainforest, not California something as important as Bigfoot wouldn’t exist there and somehow manage to remain completely undetected by humanity for so long and then continue to remain hidden after being filmed by two guys.
several high ranking department of defense and intelligence community officials both military and civilian have come forward and claimed the us government has both ufos and alien bodies in its possession, it's all real
When the government starts trying to get you to believe aliens are real is when you should start being more skeptical. They probably have UFO's since those are just advanced technology, whether those sightings are aliens or not is still questionable
it's not the government per se, but rather whistleblowers who at one time worked for the government, no one who has come forward is still in office/on active duty
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>"former" spook whistleblowers >controlled media hyping it up >controlled politicians giving any form of alien disclosure the time of day when 90% of their constituents probably don't even care that much >"leaked" footage >pentagon going out of their way to release stuff and confirm said footage
I'm not opposed to the idea of there being alien UFOs, but this whole thing stinks to me.
They're probably just planning on turning aliens into the next boogeyman to justify pumping more cash into the military industrial complex.
Mostly because people are bored. The world is very small and very boring now. There's no new land, no new people, and no new animals except a billionth beetle variant. We've pretty much got the entire globe covered. The only secrets out there aren't really things you want to know about, it's typically just people being enslaved or murdered in some unpleasant way.
We've been making up monsters for a long time but at that point it was more stories to entertain adults and teach kids to not frick off into the woods or the penis monster will vore you. Now the context is different. Since we know almost every corner of the earth, we're trying to make up new and spooky animals that have somehow, for some reason managed to elude human detection for all this time. The tables have almost turned where now we're trying to hunt them down.
try to read the entire post next time moron, the point he makes is that you can "create monsters" but focusing on the deep sea (or maybe deep african jungles) not fricking california
Making up monsters for the sake of entertainment is still kino, I can always appreciate a creepy story or legend, trying to make up spooky creatures for the sake of catching them in an environment where there’s no plausible way for them to evade human detection is weird though, getting a bunch of dudes to believe Bigfoot exists somewhere where there’s no way for him to manage to avoid being caught isn’t gonna lead to an exciting new discovery.
cryptids are not real
supernatural entities are not real
magic does not exist
we have never been visited by aliens
time travel is not possible
there has never been a human with any kind of superpower including things like foresight
here's the thing. supernatural stuff is real, because otherwise things are way too fricking boring and depressing. it can't just be email jobs and landlords all the way down. bigfoots real.
Canadian here. I've seen Sasquatch. It's real but they're endangered and I'm not saying where they are because all the jeets and bugmen and influencers would just run out and try killing it right away.
Something about the fur looks so fake, the way it’s so patchy like the fibres are all mismatched and going different directions rather than following true to the animals body. It has that synthetic satin like sheen to it too.
I had a chat with a military vet. Says him and his crew ran into a Sasquatch like creature once while out camping or something. Said it smelled like shit and was like 8ft tall. Don't know if it's true because he could have been drunk or made the story up but I choose to believe him because frick it.
There are many more stories of alien encounters than Sasquatch by ex military vets but there's some strange shit out there that the government is trying to keep hidden
>the government is trying to keep hidden
If Sasquatch was proven to be real, the government would have 4 big problems.
1) Liberals would begin to focus on saving sasquatch instead of all of their attention on saving animals and migrants.
2) People in the cities would be even more afraid of moving out of the city because they know something out there is huge and scary so rural people would be even safer from urbanites.
3) It would bring up a lot of questions about where Humans came from and people would start looking into DNA more closely and realize race is a real thing.
4) There would have to be a new push for conservation meaning that the government can't encroach on any land they want because now there's hominids they have to protect on top of endangered animal species.
This all makes sense. You know how you ride in an airplane then look down and see vast stretches of unoccupied land? That and the fact that a new species is discovered in the ocean every other week makes me wonder how much shit are we actually not seeing/refusing to see because of our dumb ape brains
I think the coverup over it is either because of the supernatural characteristics (like the eye witness accounts on how they move, things like dogman) and opening the door to "well what else is there then?" or because they are an ancient species and that leads to questions about origins and ancient history
Extremely comfy movie, a bunch of dudes palling around in the wilderness and playing with animals, then there's a Bigfoot scare for the climax. Also has the only film depiction of the Ape Canyon story.
Yowie sightings are more interesting because there's thousands of them, they're way more consistent and you don't get morons in the comments section saying "it was obviously a bear".
This cryptid gets hilarious when you realize a creature like that could never exist in NA because the time NA was avalible to apes was 20000 years ago, and there were no bipedal apes in Siberia so Sasquatch or Big Foot is actually impossible.
I just want to take this opportunity to shill my favorite cryptid YouTube channel
https://m.youtube.com/@DixieCryptid
Absolute kino Mississippi boomer storytelling
I’m glad you liked it. I’m from In Mississippi and we call the boogers. I’ve never seen one. But I’ve heard the bone chilling screams that don’t sound like any cat or bear I’ve ever heard before. It is absolutely terrifying and even when hunting and armed with guns, it makes you want to piss your pants and run.
People don't often mention bigfoot in North Carolina, but there are many rural areas and swamps and forests. I've never seen or heard anything unusual from my experience inawoods. But some of my grandfather's friends said they were out there. And other wierd shit too.
Well listening to Dixie Cryptid, I learned the lore is that the screamers are creatures called Gugwe. They are like berserk Bigfoot and if they spot you they go mad and want to kill you. Most Bigfoot will try to just disappear quickly into the brush if they realize you’ve spotted them.
There's a lot of folklore in eastern NC. Mostly involving panthers. Big black mountain lions that kill livestock and attack people at night. The old-timers still tell these stories. I suppose there were panthers here once, but I've never seen one. I've seen black bears and huge bobcats, but no panthers. But the stories the old folks tell about the Lowhaints (the little grey-skinned men with big black eyes who come at night) always creeped me out the most. They sometimes call them moon-eyed people. But they come out in forest at night, and the old folks were terrified of them. Pic related.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Lowhaints
Creepy
Everywhere there is plenty of forest and low human population is going to support cryptid survival. And the south has that
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Indeed. There are many strange tales of mankind's intrusion into primordial places.
sasquatch chronicles has loads of eye witness accounts, would make a great streaming series reconstructing the best ones. Some good accounts among all that lot, whatever some of these people saw, it definitely fricked them up
Minimum viable population (MVP) is a lower bound on the population of a species, such that it can survive in the wild. This term is commonly used in the fields of biology, ecology, and conservation biology. MVP refers to the smallest possible size at which a biological population can exist without facing extinction from natural disasters or demographic, environmental, or genetic stochasticity.
>These guys just so happened to film the only sighting of this specific kind of bigfoot. No one else has seen this specific kind ever again.
Uh huh. Ok. I believe you, man. What're you selling?
This guy from a special forces division in the marines in this episode of Cosmic Disclosure from Gaia talks about his experience seeing Sasquatch and the multidimensional nature of them, along with how they are actually playful and hilarious
You need a membership for Gaia but I shared this for free. And I definitely recommend any episode with randy cramer or really anyone on Cosmic Disclosure episodes and the Deep Space series if you’re into this stuff.
>This guy from a special forces division in the marines in this episode of Cosmic Disclosure from Gaia talks about his experience seeing Sasquatch and the multidimensional nature of them
Stan Winston, one of the greatest special effects men of all time, thought it was bullshit. That's enough for me.
>special effect guy fancies himself a biology expert
The GOAT special effects man is good at recognizing special effects and how they work.
In what way did he say it's bullshit on a technical level?
>meanwhile considers himself a biology expert
It clearly has breasts, and its stride looksl ike that of a black woman. Not being funny either.
>thighs wobble but the ass it motionless like a carapace
>convenient lack of hair in a visor
Analog's better suited for it, no pixels to alter.
The people who try to "prove" that it's anatomically correct aren't biology experts either.
effect guy fancies himself a biology expert
>not a single credible report of such a creature within biologist circles
So you just made the argument that Bigfoot does not and has never existed.
Thanks!
It's clearly real and there are many real videos of others, from all over, America, Russia. More and more all the time. There are fakes too but they are mostly easy enough to distinguish between the two. Most people just can't think for themselves and are waiting for muh authority to declare that it's real.
Care to link some of those other videos you consider real?
I'm skeptical of that because there's a youtube bigfoot community that doesn't do much other than endlessly analyze and re-analyze the Patterson Gimlin footage, you'd think they'd be eager to have some other good material to work with
you know what they say about big feet, hehehe
Big socks?
And never duplicated. Curious.
Bigfoot is so fricking real, it's not even funny. It's more sad than anything that people are so obtuse about it.
bigfoot was real but they were exterminated to protect logging and mining corps
yeah they're real, luv me sasquatch chronicles bedtime listening
I don't know, how many? How many dead bears do people come across?
actually debunked
>debunked
spend a lot of time getting debunked?
Adam, pls.
To me the funniest part of this is not the wojak itself, but rather that someone was so assblasted over being constantly called out for his bullshit that they had to make this
I know you cultist brainwashed morons don’t think that being debunked is real, but people in the real world (and are at least somewhat intelligent) know that truth is a very important value to hold to keep your sanity.
You fricking have to stop closing your eyes and ears to the world around you. Unless you are literally a toddler.
Watching the stabilized video debunks it 100%
More the opposite
>Too grainy to make out any specific features, features that people claim to see are pareidolia at best, disingenuous at worst
>Plenty of people can replicate the walk despite what people say
>Patterson went out in a cowboy costume to film a bigfoot movie and just coincidentally found one, he filmed a bigfoot movie with no apparent bigfoot costume
>He drew and collected stories about bigfoot and even published a book 8 years prior to the sighting claiming it was real, and got ridiculed for it
>Freaked out when gimlin raised a gun towards it, urged him not to fire
>Gimlin even doubts it was real now
This motherfricker doesn't even walk right. He does a little arm swing, turns his head, and mouthbreathers call it spot on. But he doesn't even bend his knees high enough. His stride isn't long enough. His arms don't reach the same length on his leg as the bigfoot. It's so blatant to anyone with eyes, that if you really think the two are one in the same based on what you see, I firmly believe you should be declared legally blind.
>Gimlin even doubts it was real now
How the frick would it be fake without him knowing?
He claims despite their friendship, Roger wasn't above lying to him about finances and even used his name when taking out a loan on the camera equipment they used.
He says its not much of a stretch that patterson could've paid a guy in a suit considering they were supposed to shoot a movie about bigfoot and one just suddenly appeared, roger assumed gimlin wasn't carrying ammunition.
>Roger wasn't above lying to him about finances and even used his name when taking out a loan on the camera equipment they used.
Roger Patterson also put his horse infront of gimlin raising his weapon to prevent him shooting it, which raises some red flags for me.
He was really dead set on the thing walking out of sight for some unexplained reason, despite Gimlin having several chances at a clean shot.
Do any apes have hairy bimbo breasts like this in the wild? asking for a friend
no, apes unilaterally have hairless breasts
How big do gorilla breasts get?
Clearly not, as bigfoot displays hair growth on the breasts.
They wouldn't fake that.
Awoooa!
>>Too grainy to make out any specific features, features that people claim to see are pareidolia at best, disingenuous at worst
you can clearly see its saggy breasts as it turns around, a detail that probably wouldn't be included if it was fake
Why not? Patterson drew bigfoot with breasts 8 years before the encounter.
He's a good artist btw, should have stuck with that.
You forget that Patterson threatened legal action when William Roe's daughter tried to publish her late father's story that just happened to be eerily similar to how the PGF encounter happened.
Patterson was quite happy to protect the financial incentives of bigfoot, didn't really care about actually looking into it further.
I have this autistic theory that people in the past all had a basic level of art skill that today we think is "good" but was considered standard back then, and I think it's because of the way art was taught in school. So what the average person who completed high school could draw back then is better than most deviantart artists today.
first, nice trips. second, it's not as autistic as you think. animation schools used to teach animators how to simulate body weight. i don't know if i still have the jpg but richard williams, head animator on shit like roger rabbitt, literally btfo the entire calarts academy with a simple demonstration because they stopped teaching it
ok yeah this is nail-in-the-coffin tier
the breasts convinced me too
interesting, but probably disinfo from big sasquatch
The breasts are the best part
Patterson being a hairy wildwoman fetishist is much more believeable imo
R. Crumb
Crumb is really more of an ass guy
I love this creep Pepe because it’s based off a real dude. Anyone of the actual image? There’s always somebody watching.
i've got this one
close enough
>He drew and collected stories about bigfoot and even published a book 8 years prior to the sighting claiming it was real, and got ridiculed for it
Fricking bullshit, he'd have been called out instantly.
>Look it up
>It's real
What the frick
This just proves to me he was quite happy to profit off of bigfoot, so why not make the hoax
That, or he genuinely wanted to make a bigfoot movie, recorded the suit, and then figured "hey, this looks legitimate, we could make a killing off of this" and ditched the movie idea (and subsequently, the suit)
>go out to film bigfoot
>film bigfoot
we're through the looking glass here people
He didn't moron, he went out to film a bigfoot movie but was in full cowboy costume and one happened to appear
>but was in full cowboy costume and one happened to appear
Maybe Bigfoot is gay for cowboys? Someone in PNW dress up as a gay cowboy and find out
The walk always seemed like bigfoot was in really big shoes and couldn't quite walk right with obstacles like branches and rocks on the floor
or like a diver wearing diving flippers
at 0:03-0:05 seconds, the thigh caves in like a party costume suit
thats what kills it for me alongside the very obvious rubber feet
If it's a costume, why does it have breasts?
Because females are 50% of the population, chud
or Patterson was just a furry
Either are more plausible than ape in the north pacific
Could it.... could it be.....? No.... that's...... that's impossible.......
No but this is a good comparison between male/female. Look at the left, at trump, straight back, small posterior. NOw look at the right, slightly hunched foward posture, bulbous posterior. That's a female bigfoot.
Disrespectful libshit. President Trump has a much fatter ass than that ugly monkey.
Liberals are so afflicted with TDS they can't even appreciate 45's juicy booty.
I choose to believe its real because its more fun to believe its real and despite the video video being put under extreme scrutiny for 50 years its still been unable to be proved as fake.
I choose to believe you're a homosexual.
Bigfoot believers, explain, why isn’t there a single bigfoot bone?
They bury their dead.
So do humans, guess how many human bones you could find if you went out to look for em.
There are. They just haven't been identified as such. It's part of their anonymity.
>Bigfoot believers, explain, why isn’t there a single bigfoot bone?
There are tons of bones out there. People just don't bother to pick them up, especially when they're all gross and rotted, just like with other animal carcasses/bodyparts. Covered in bugs and goop and dirt. I ain't touching the shit, and neither are you. It's probably just a moose bone anyway.
UFOs abducted them all
people don't explore the woods looking for bones to send to laboratories to determine what species they belong to
If it's fake, do it again.
Nobody ever has, and until they do, I'll assume it's real
If you think its real why do you think there's never been a video that good since? Do you think it was just a small amount of them in the pacific northwest and they went extinct?
>If you think its real why do you think there's never been a video that good since?
Not him, but I've taken the liberty of providing in my opinion some of the best videos out there that deserve the same level of scrutiny as the Patterson film.
>that first video
Didn't even bother with the rest, you have below average IQ.
What, make a realistic monkey suit? People have all the time. 2001 A Space Odyssey
Look like shit in comparison, the PG film has muscle definition and way better fur
She's quite tiny for one of her species
(5'11" guy for scale)
I am open to the idea of sasquatch existing, or rather having existed but potentially now being extinct or on the verge of it but I absolutely do not believe the bullshit about them being 7+ feet tall
I think if you saw a large, wild, unknown ape that was human height you'd just imagine them being really tall
This is the biggest smoking gun in my opinion, she's like six foot.
>Patterson says shes 7'5"
>Gimlin, who was there, gives multiple interviews seperately saying she was around 6 foot, and that he's seen men taller
>Patterson urges gimlin to not talk to the media anymore until Patterson's early death
Its not some hulking beast which to me makes it more plausible being a person in a suit
Alot of people seemingly forget they did take plaster casts of the feet that were determined to be completely fake (Patterson did say that someone was stomping around in bigfoot fake shoes to try to discredit him)
>they did take plaster casts of the feet that were determined to be completely fake
When were these taken? I assume very soon after the movie was filmed, since those footprints wouldn't last intact for long, so how could people have found out about the exact place it happened and gone and stomped around in big shoes before they went to take prints of them?
YOU EAT BABIES!
Patterson was a grifter and that footage is fricking awful to use as evidence.
Florida skunk ape on the other hand..
If this was one photo, I'd say its fake as frick. But the fact that there's two, and there's visible movement between the two from everything from the musculature in the arm, to the facial expression with its nose and lips and eyes, to the repositioning of its feet and its entire posture. If it's a statue (like some people say it's one from a Ripley's museum), there'd have to be two (unlikely) or it would have be articulated in a very advanced way (unlikely). If it was a costume to accommodate all of that, it was a very advanced and complicated costume, oscar-worthy special effects, wasted on two photos and that's it. The Myakka photos are the best evidence, hands down.
N-nani?!
looks like a muddy orangutan
that'd make sense that is what a "skunk ape" would be
a great ape species in north america would probably be most likely related to the orangutan lineage that crossed over to north america across the bering strait as there were orangutan relatives, that we know of, up to china
Still pretty spooky to have a huge feral orangutan running around the suburbs.
That was proven to be an orangutan that escaped the Zoo previously
This is so much more believable, not just all the evidence in the photos but that it was never really presented as some bigfoot-type thing where we know a ton about it but somehow never actually see one. It could totally be some feral zoo animal or a government experiment.
It's a fricking ape in the jungle
This picture was taken by some old lady in her backyard.
Average American woman
Didn't the guys who did it all talk very openly about how they did it? Like they're proud of it, it's not even a secret where it was filmed.
obvious shite for morons OP(you) now disprove that
Why does its ass have a visible entrance hatch
oh shit after 50 years this eagle eyed anon cracked the case
>oh shit after 50 years this eagle eyed anon cracked the case
/thread
dude that's fake
I can totally see all the individual muscles work and the facial expressions and the individual toes though
to hide voldemort
>We need to film a bigfoot for our documentary
>4 hours later he finds one near a parking lot.
How lucky
>tfw no good bigfoot horror movie
it's a crying shame really
>but what about willow creek!
i said good
Exists is the only bigfoot movie I have ever enjoyed.
Frick that shit. I want a bigfoot action movie. I want to see Bigfoot fight a clan of ninjas and rescue the president or some shit. Bigfoot as the villain monster is so overplayed.
There are a few good Bigfoot movies, but most of them aren't horror. Willow Creek and Exists are the best Bigfoot horror movies.
Don't forget about
>The Legend of Boggy Creek
is that the thinly veiled cuck fetish one with the fat naked b***h or was that willow creek? frick that was an awful movie
Easily the best Bigfoot movie but it's not horror.
You're probably thinking of Willow Creek, which ended on a fat naked b***h but didn't involve any cuck shit you psycho.
isn't that the movie where the guy and his fiance go camping and bigfoot kidnaps women and makes them into "brides of the forest" or some shit?
Willow Creek is yes
There isn't enough detail in the film to prove it isn't a man in a suit. You can't prove a negative under any circumstance anyway. For me, the best information from the film comes from the anatomy of what we see about the skull. If that was a suit for a person to fit inside, they would have to be standing on stilts because a human skull couldn't fit inside the head piece. That's a sagital crest on top; similar to a gorilla's. If you put a person in a suit like that, lower than the top of the head, the elbows and knees would look awkward and misaligned relative to the head. The creature in the film moves fluidly, and there's even a sports hernia on the right thigh. If it's a suit, it's the best ape suit ever constructed.
>The creature in the film moves fluidly, and there's even a sports hernia on the right thigh.
Fricking lmao
you mean a crease in the suit that is too wide in the thigh?
also according to this,
The suit doesn't seem that big at all height wise.
>it's the best ape suit ever constructed.
The fact it isn't in good quality sure does help it alot. The bad camera hides alot of the worst aspects of the suit.
Any comment on why the bottoms of the feet are different sizes and completely solid rectangles aside from moulding for the toes, or?
>Cameras go HD
>Bigfoot sightings on video vanish
hmm, noticing a pattern that happens with UFOs too
I would love to believe in bigfoot but the suit videos really dont help.
The issue of the 'flat foot' would seem to be consistent with bigfoot footprints. Them dudes got big ol' flat feet. They're big and heavy. Their feet would likely become flat and arch less to support their weight.
what if the helmet had a crest built into it?
The neck turns in the film. If the helmet had an extra few inches on top, the head would look too tall relative to the neck when it turns toward the camera.
> You can't prove a negative under any circumstance anyway.
This is false. This hackney saying only applies to a very specific form of the scientific method no one uses.
Of course I can prove a negative.
For example,I can prove there is not a real elephant in my room after looking for one.
When using all the normal definitions of “elephant” and “in my room”
Quite right. However, you cannot prove that there has NEVER been an elephant in your room.
What gives me pause is that the maker of an ape suit that complex wouldn’t have come out of nowhere and vanished again. Serious people in the costuming world and maybe monster movie fandom back then would have known at a glance who made it. Enthusiasts recognize these things.
Why do you think it's a complex suit? it really isn't, the film quality is hiding alot of the imperfections and finer details that we'd immediately see if it was shot with a decent camera.
Just look at the examples in this thread - some people pointing out the ass looks sewed shut, some people pointing out the crease in the suit's leg bowing inward, some people pointing out the flat rubber boots on the bottoms of the soles, some people pointing to what looks like a belt in the middle of the costume.
All these could be paredolia too, but its a far simpler observation than it's a real complex suit.
People attribute the suit's complex design to ONE costume designer on planet of the apes who said it's too difficult, whilst they tend to ignore several others who also worked on planet of the apes who insisted it's completely doable, and their issue was not being able to use real animal furs, which the suit in the footage obviously has tacked onto the suit.
Patterson himself was a bit of a craftsman and artist, and knew how to taxidermy and draw anatomically correct apes.
Many special effects creators have viewed the film. They always say it's quality is unlike anything that could be produced in the 60s, 70s, even 80s. I just can't get over the skull size issue. A human skull simply will not fit in there AND have the elbows, knees, and neck in the proportionally correct places.
>Many special effects creators have viewed the film. They always say it's quality is unlike anything that could be produced in the 60s, 70s, even 80s
Commonly misattributed to one guy working on planet of the apes, of which there were many special effects artists that said it COULD be replicated.
>I just can't get over the skull size issue
It's called a football helmet.
>A human skull simply will not fit in there AND have the elbows, knees, and neck in the proportionally correct places.
see
Lines up pretty well proportionally imo, its not like you see patty's hands move at all either, meaning you can lengthen the forearms as much as you like if you really wanted to.
Woah.. the skull.. I just can't get over the skull size issue. Its the smoking gun.. he must be real, there's simply no way to fake that..
You make valid arguments to my post. I can appreciate the validity of your reasoning. But I still have difficulty with human head inside the helmet. The neck appears to turn in such a way that the head is in perfect proportion to the body. There is also speculation about which lense was being used on the camera that shot the film. But That's far to long a discussion for the basket weaving forum. My final point is this: the footage is interesting. Not because it proves anything, but because it has the potential to be authentic. I suppose I wish to believe that it is genuine. Maybe that's a flaw in my reasoning, but I enjoy a good mystery. I enjoy the debate, the speculation, and hearing all the arguments. It's thought provoking and I've always like that about unexplained shit. The footage exists. And I've enjoyed many years of research and investigation into paranormal things. I just think it's cool to wonder about possibilities.
This guy is nuts, that thing could rip his wiener off
I want a pet monke so bad bros
monkeith will never betray you
Damnit, anon... Don't post heartbreaking shit like that. 🙁
relationship goals
>I suppose I wish to believe that it is genuine.
Same, believe it or not I'm not actually a skeptic, I just think there's far better evidence elsewhere. Everything about Patterson was fraudulent, and I don't think its wise to give him the benefit of the doubt considering he was in the business of deceptions for years before AND after this.
If bigfoot was real it would be amazing. The Patterson film is, as you said, interesting. But everything about it could be replicated by a human, and for patterson's reputation, its just a far more likelier outcome.
I agree. I'm a skeptical anon myself. But I always bend toward possibilities. I have become convinced that our world is a strange place, and it would be supremely foolish of us to think we could ever understand everything. I embrace the the mysteries, and work toward learning ever more about them. Even if I encounter clever hoaxes along the way. I simply love knowing that there's always more to learn and new frontiers to explore. Always keep an open mind; but not so open that your brain falls out.
never disproven btw
lol thats my uncle willy. he just looks like that
Let's see that again
You know, I like the bigfoot threads
>the mythical yeti
>is just a hairy, overweight monke
I bet any cougar could massacre him
god i wish a cougar would massacre me
If Bigfoots are real then why have we never found any body parts or bones from them? If they were real you'd think we'd have physical evidence of their existence by now.
You know how domesticated hogs turn feral after a generation or two in the wild? How they grow corse hair and tusks and get larger? I have a theory that humans might react the same way. What if there were some isolated pockets of feral humans (in large forested areas, national parks, cave systems, etc.) that live in remote places? They might regress into physical morphology better suited for life in wilderness.
>Larger size
>Increased hair
>Greater physical strength
It might explain some of those Missing 411 cases.
I like this theory
it sounds decent, a movie could use it, but sadly there are humans that live in the wilderness and don't look like that
Also know that humans have some biological similarly with pigs; at least as far as organ structure and function. I don't think it would take many generations of maybe twenty humans living on the frontier of civilization to move into extremely remote areas, and then disregard language and society altogether in exchange for living as creatures of the land. The implications of such a move backwards as to call up dormant genes we once used for survival in the distant past. Our genetics remember...
Furthermore, the frontier of North America was a BIG place between the 18th and 19th century. It would be easy to lose yourself to... More private ways of survival.
Reminds me of that pasta about underground colonies of human mutants that exist in gigantic clusters always touching each other
except there are amazon tribes that live with little outside contact, and the North Sentilese that live with utterly no contact, and they are not like that.
Then there are stories of children who have lived with wolves
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_child
Bullshit. Humans aren't going to forget spoken language in a generation or two.
Yeah, maybe not completely in that span of time. But I'm assuming that if a small group of people either chose or were forced to leave civilization, they may not have had a good grasp of spoken or written words in the first place. After a few generations in the wilderness, it would become easier to point, vocalize, etc. Rather than speak.
"Bigfoots" has never, will never, and cannot be the theory. People have never argued for the existence of anything but THE Bigfoot, those who try to "rationalize" or provide evidence otherwise are legit disinfo trying to confuse and obfuscate the truth. Our two most reliable pieces of evidence for Bigfoot(Teddy Roosevelt and the OP film) both only show THE singular Bigfoot. It's because the only logical conclusion is that Bigfoot is an entity that cannot be killed, captured, harmed, and is immortal and possibly ethereal that they try to make it seem not so. But if you sit down and read the evidence it's clear this is the case
faefolk > big monke
DUENDE?!!! ay dios mio
mimimimimimi
BASADO!!
that's just a homeless or junkie squatter
a squatter squatting in a dog house?
I don't see any wings, this just looks like a midget or kid with a jacket
it's time to take the final redpill... Cinemaphile....
i live in a remote part of north America in a mountainous and heavily forested area and I feed and interact with bigfeet and they trust me to keep their identity safe so ive never reported it or taken photos. they're pretty smart, like somewhere in the middle between a gorilla and a black person
damn so they're almost as smart as gorillas?
extremely underrated
Where is it speculated that they live?
it was a bear
HEY BOOBOO
OMG HE'S JUST LIKE MY CARTOONS
I wish I lived in NorCal Bigfoot country
i encountered bigfoot in a truck stop bathroom off highway 65 in the winter of 1988. his penis is surprisingly small, but he fricks like his life depends on it
Dom? Sub? HIV poz or no? Circumcised? Was he good at foreplay? Did he wish to remain anonymous? Why wasn't he hibernating in the winter? Is it true he is into feet? How long did he last? Was he anything like his gay sex scene in Harry and the Hendersons or was that a stunt double?
>Cell phones with cameras get made
>Cryptid reports fricking vanish
I knew they were all probably hoaxes anyway, but there was always that little faint hope they MIGHT'VE been real. It's kind of saddening bros. Feels like there's less magic in the world than there used to be.
It is well known that Sasquatch emits an electromagnetic field akin to a short-range EMP, of course evidence would become more scarce as there are fewer film cameras around
>Cryptid reports fricking vanish
This is just something you read on reddit and fell for because you're a dumb Black person moron.
Whether you believe them or not, people still report cryptids all the time.
I laughed my ass off when i 1st saw this commercial many moons ago.
Consider this, as our ability to create hoaxes improves we are more quick to dismiss what might be actual evidence because we have the ability to create a fake version easily.
So even if we have better evidence we aren't going to believe it anyways but that does not make it fake.
are you guys team apers or team woo?
it would have cost more to fake it than to just find bigfoot
Bigfoot is more believable than aliens visiting earth despite how much it’s made fun of. Yes, it’s moronic, but beings from other solar systems whizzing around with jets for some fricking reason requires more leaps of logic
in terms of likeliness you are right
but in terms of how sure we are given our investigation, an alien is more plausible
>see any bigfoot/yowie/sasquatch/yeti/hairy man etc. media with a comment section
>"They are INTERDIMENSIONAL BEINGS not of this Earth. They are real but only show themselves to those lucky few with ENERGY CONNECTIONS and STRONG AURAS and are here to spread PEACE and LOVE
every time
I literally have to step outside my aura to reply to this because the kid gloves come off to teach ignorance like this. Those who don’t want to learn must BE learned, and so the pitch of reality i’m currently intending with my mind must be lowered to your frequency. Huh. It’s sort of like doing baby speak to a dog or child, but instead of putting on a voice you’re literally lowering your cognition and the dimensions of reality you are perceiving. Not been in the waking world for a while, it’s weird, so… solid, such simple shapes. Thoughts are… chemical, elemental, savage. lll make it brief. I’ve stepped down to your level so that one day you may come up to mine and thank me. Yes, this is the obvious truth of what bigfoot fundamentally is. He’s from a more primitive… let’s say, blank slate state of human perception, before centuries of programming in causal logic, separating subject and object. He doesn’t exist in the way your flaccid little brain thinks things exist, in one space, and in another, and another, in discrete moments in time continually. It’s like asking when zeus goes to the toilet, or what he does in his spare time- he exists in half reverie, in a state of timeless being and multi faceted infinite self contemplation that cant begin to make sense to contingent animals like ourselves- gods enter our world and at least in image form operate on its rules, like moving paintings on air, but these are merely representations of manoeuvres of immaterial willpower and conscious intention which shape our reality and we process these massive changes slower than they really occur by making them events in time. THAT’S what the big monkey is. A construction of our feeble minds for spiritual events happening far beyond the scope of time, we process them with bad computers which render slowly. Hopefully this has enlightened you a bit, i’m off back upstairs.
he's just a monkey innit
If you just take people's encounters at face value, bigfoot being an interdimensional being is the most "logical" explanation. The irony is the materialist "lost primate" theories have to ignore like half of all encounters because they don't fit into their paradigm.
My favorite theory is that bigfoots have been enslaved and are used as a sort of biological ATV to do various tasks for some higher alien race. The Bigfeets themselves are dumb and stupid, but have been trained and given some super advanced tech.
In any case, Bigfoot is more likely a moron who is at best neutral, if not outright hostile to humans, not some being meant to bestow hard BBE (Big Bigfoot Energy) to patchouli soaked crystal queen neo-pagan witches.
>to do various tasks for some higher alien race
An advanced alien race would be able to rely on AI and robotics and automation to do all its labor as efficiently as possible, there's no reason they would choose slow unreliable meat slaves instead. Except as a joke I guess
This is just a 21st century materialist human way of looking at things, where we assume the only tech aliens could have or want are very advanced versions of our post-industrial computer based technology. That or Bigfoot is a robot.
this has nothing to do with bigfoot but it seemed like the thread to vent, i spent 100 bucks on a spirit box hoping i could find some ghosties, but so far no luck. even went to a graveyard, should be jam packed with spirits there, but still no phenomena, what a frickin gyp
If you were a ghost would you want to hang out in a graveyard? Try a stripclub
if I was a ghost I would go to Christina Hendricks' house to watch her undress, try there
You're right, that footage of Bigfoot has never been disproven and that makes sóyentists and losers on this board seethe. Bigfoot is real and Earth is hollow and Bigfoot lives inside the Hollow Earth.
never disproven btw
Add some fur and a weird face and film the first shot in 144p and you've got some fairly convincing cryptid footage
Is it just me or is there a resurgence of Bigfoot "culture" and interest in the last 6 or so years? I'm not really sure what caused him to resurface when he was kind of absent from commercialization for awhile. Now every trip I take to any sort of outdoors/wooded destination has t-shirts, mugs, hats, etc. of him. Even in Roswell I found more Bigfoot junk than actual tacky alienshit.
Also what the frick is it with Bigfoot and erotica? This chick(presumably) makes bank off of it. Women cannot help themselves around the BBC(BFC?)
>I'm not really sure what caused him to resurface when he was kind of absent from commercialization for awhile.
There are some kino youtube channels that are genuinely entertaining even if you don't believe in it.
Bob Gymlan and Australian Yowie Witness Reports are my picks
>Bob Gymlan
I like him but his reasoning for bigfoot existing is moronic.
>In games of chance in a casino, there's always a small chance of you winning big, that small chance always exists, ergo, bigfoot exists, its just a very small chance of meeting him but its always present
Oh yeah some of his stuff is moronic, where he really shines are the when he reads the accounts people send him.
Also his non cryptid animal attack videos are kino which is how I first found him (Lions of Tsavo)
The one that got me was when he tried to argue that bigfoots used infrasounds to scare people off from finding them.
>there are animals that produce low-frequencies to stun prey and human
>that means Bigfoot does it too because... it just does, okay?!
It's like he pulls shit out of his ass to justify why people haven't found anything yet.
>Also what the frick is it with Bigfoot and erotica?
You wouldn't frick bigfoot if the oppurtunity presented itself?
This, bigfoot is a very loving partner
top kek
For me, this one was better.
At first I was laughing.
But then I cried.
They really be called wienerburn
I used to believe in bigfoot but I've spent many nights in foothills around Mt Rainier and only found Mountain Lions and Elk.
I've bumped into more drug deals and MAGA types having gay sex than Bigfeet.(fyi BIG gay community doing lots of fricking in the woods near Yelm WA)
Never ever heard a yell or nothing...
>fyi BIG gay community doing lots of fricking in the woods near Yelm WA
how big are we talking?
hundreds of gay men living in caves
sounds crusty as frick
YelmBros...
Big foot? Real
Nessie? Real as hell
Okay, but, assuming it is fake, how did they make it look so convincing?
Have you ever watched the video? The quality is terrible and it's filmed from a distance.
It may be the best hoax ever produced, I can only really think of the surgeon's photo as rivalling it for how its stood the test of time and like it, will probably only be debunked by someone who was actually involved in the hoax.
bigfootgays are pushing the "its maybe not real but its super convincing!" meme now, lmao
never disproven btw
That just the trunk of an elephant in the water.
never disproven
Imagine getting served by this cat then he takes your girl
Bigfoot is real but your reality isn't
Why do motherfrickers always make up bullshit animals like Bigfoot and try to pass them off like they’re some mystery we don’t know about when 70% of the Earth above water has been explored and mapped out, you really want us to believe that there’s some missing link between humanity and monkeys hanging out in fricking California and we somehow didn’t find any evidence of it’s existence until the late 60s in the form of a shitty low res grainy film made by two people one of which has all the reason in the world to make shit up about a Bigfoot and the other is a guy who he’s been confirmed to have lied to before, really?
Why not make up something about how there’s prehistoric animals still existing at the bottom of the ocean that we haven’t discovered yet or there’s some spooky cryptid hanging out at the bottom of the Marianas Trench, why make shit up for a landmas we know most things there are to know in places where people can easily point out these things aren’t real instead of setting them at the bottom of the sea which we’ve barely explored?
>70% of the Earth above water has been explored and mapped out
That leaves plenty of room for Bigfoot to frick about in undetected
Yeah in a fricking jungle like the Amazon Rainforest, not California something as important as Bigfoot wouldn’t exist there and somehow manage to remain completely undetected by humanity for so long and then continue to remain hidden after being filmed by two guys.
So what? The US government confirmed UFOs exist so why shouldn't bigfoot?
Only in the sense that the acronym actually just means an unexplained object. They did not confirm alien spaceships.
several high ranking department of defense and intelligence community officials both military and civilian have come forward and claimed the us government has both ufos and alien bodies in its possession, it's all real
They dont have aliens or ufo's
When the government starts trying to get you to believe aliens are real is when you should start being more skeptical. They probably have UFO's since those are just advanced technology, whether those sightings are aliens or not is still questionable
it's not the government per se, but rather whistleblowers who at one time worked for the government, no one who has come forward is still in office/on active duty
>"former" spook whistleblowers
>controlled media hyping it up
>controlled politicians giving any form of alien disclosure the time of day when 90% of their constituents probably don't even care that much
>"leaked" footage
>pentagon going out of their way to release stuff and confirm said footage
I'm not opposed to the idea of there being alien UFOs, but this whole thing stinks to me.
They're probably just planning on turning aliens into the next boogeyman to justify pumping more cash into the military industrial complex.
Elizondo is the textbook glowBlack person case
Mostly because people are bored. The world is very small and very boring now. There's no new land, no new people, and no new animals except a billionth beetle variant. We've pretty much got the entire globe covered. The only secrets out there aren't really things you want to know about, it's typically just people being enslaved or murdered in some unpleasant way.
We've been making up monsters for a long time but at that point it was more stories to entertain adults and teach kids to not frick off into the woods or the penis monster will vore you. Now the context is different. Since we know almost every corner of the earth, we're trying to make up new and spooky animals that have somehow, for some reason managed to elude human detection for all this time. The tables have almost turned where now we're trying to hunt them down.
try to read the entire post next time moron, the point he makes is that you can "create monsters" but focusing on the deep sea (or maybe deep african jungles) not fricking california
>try to read the entire post next time moron
no
my posts are for myself
Making up monsters for the sake of entertainment is still kino, I can always appreciate a creepy story or legend, trying to make up spooky creatures for the sake of catching them in an environment where there’s no plausible way for them to evade human detection is weird though, getting a bunch of dudes to believe Bigfoot exists somewhere where there’s no way for him to manage to avoid being caught isn’t gonna lead to an exciting new discovery.
cryptids are not real
supernatural entities are not real
magic does not exist
we have never been visited by aliens
time travel is not possible
there has never been a human with any kind of superpower including things like foresight
the real world is weird enough
>Black folk imagines super realistic muscle movement
That’s a man
4U
-R-E-M-I-N-D-E-R-
>fur suit
https://www.reddit.com/r/bigfoot/comments/qgge41/i_just_noticed_pattys_thighs_jiggle/
You can't disprove an axiom
here's the thing. supernatural stuff is real, because otherwise things are way too fricking boring and depressing. it can't just be email jobs and landlords all the way down. bigfoots real.
%3D
Canadian here. I've seen Sasquatch. It's real but they're endangered and I'm not saying where they are because all the jeets and bugmen and influencers would just run out and try killing it right away.
Bigfoot stays safe tonight.
what are they like are they chill
>Canadian here
my condolences
I'm Imagining how comfy a pair of sasquatch hair slippers would be. Maybe you should let a few of those bugmen bag some bigfeet
>Canadian here
Good morning saar
>not Samsquamch
Nah, you’re a phoney
>L-listen my silly little friend; there's no such samsquamch as a thing... Randers! Let's hit the liquor store, bud!
i've always been into the theory that they are inter-dimensional and they peace out through portals in the trees.
It's a man walking along in a gorilla suit, what can you disprove about it?
Something about the fur looks so fake, the way it’s so patchy like the fibres are all mismatched and going different directions rather than following true to the animals body. It has that synthetic satin like sheen to it too.
Never disproven btw
Bigfoot is so boring. A big ape, wow. Now a big spider or snake, that would be something.
I had a chat with a military vet. Says him and his crew ran into a Sasquatch like creature once while out camping or something. Said it smelled like shit and was like 8ft tall. Don't know if it's true because he could have been drunk or made the story up but I choose to believe him because frick it.
There are many more stories of alien encounters than Sasquatch by ex military vets but there's some strange shit out there that the government is trying to keep hidden
>the government is trying to keep hidden
If Sasquatch was proven to be real, the government would have 4 big problems.
1) Liberals would begin to focus on saving sasquatch instead of all of their attention on saving animals and migrants.
2) People in the cities would be even more afraid of moving out of the city because they know something out there is huge and scary so rural people would be even safer from urbanites.
3) It would bring up a lot of questions about where Humans came from and people would start looking into DNA more closely and realize race is a real thing.
4) There would have to be a new push for conservation meaning that the government can't encroach on any land they want because now there's hominids they have to protect on top of endangered animal species.
This all makes sense. You know how you ride in an airplane then look down and see vast stretches of unoccupied land? That and the fact that a new species is discovered in the ocean every other week makes me wonder how much shit are we actually not seeing/refusing to see because of our dumb ape brains
I think the coverup over it is either because of the supernatural characteristics (like the eye witness accounts on how they move, things like dogman) and opening the door to "well what else is there then?" or because they are an ancient species and that leads to questions about origins and ancient history
There's some shit out there alright
I'm just saying that there is more evidence FOR Bigfoot than there is evidence AGAINST Bigfoot.
Based samsquatch
I heard one of those homies when I went off trail on the PCT in Washington.
Extremely comfy movie, a bunch of dudes palling around in the wilderness and playing with animals, then there's a Bigfoot scare for the climax. Also has the only film depiction of the Ape Canyon story.
>fun Bigfoot thread
>instantly brigaded by angry redd*tors insisting it’s fake and anyone enjoying themselves itt is dumb
Really makes you think.
>morons who can barely grasp movies made for children think they're evolutionary biology, ecology, and primatology experts
lol
>furgay trying to act smug
Yowie sightings are more interesting because there's thousands of them, they're way more consistent and you don't get morons in the comments section saying "it was obviously a bear".
This cryptid gets hilarious when you realize a creature like that could never exist in NA because the time NA was avalible to apes was 20000 years ago, and there were no bipedal apes in Siberia so Sasquatch or Big Foot is actually impossible.
I just want to take this opportunity to shill my favorite cryptid YouTube channel
https://m.youtube.com/@DixieCryptid
Absolute kino Mississippi boomer storytelling
>Based quads
>Based channel too
It really is a cool channel
I’m glad you liked it. I’m from In Mississippi and we call the boogers. I’ve never seen one. But I’ve heard the bone chilling screams that don’t sound like any cat or bear I’ve ever heard before. It is absolutely terrifying and even when hunting and armed with guns, it makes you want to piss your pants and run.
People don't often mention bigfoot in North Carolina, but there are many rural areas and swamps and forests. I've never seen or heard anything unusual from my experience inawoods. But some of my grandfather's friends said they were out there. And other wierd shit too.
Well listening to Dixie Cryptid, I learned the lore is that the screamers are creatures called Gugwe. They are like berserk Bigfoot and if they spot you they go mad and want to kill you. Most Bigfoot will try to just disappear quickly into the brush if they realize you’ve spotted them.
gugwe story https://youtu.be/bQk0fBc9_K0
There's a lot of folklore in eastern NC. Mostly involving panthers. Big black mountain lions that kill livestock and attack people at night. The old-timers still tell these stories. I suppose there were panthers here once, but I've never seen one. I've seen black bears and huge bobcats, but no panthers. But the stories the old folks tell about the Lowhaints (the little grey-skinned men with big black eyes who come at night) always creeped me out the most. They sometimes call them moon-eyed people. But they come out in forest at night, and the old folks were terrified of them. Pic related.
>Lowhaints
Creepy
Everywhere there is plenty of forest and low human population is going to support cryptid survival. And the south has that
Indeed. There are many strange tales of mankind's intrusion into primordial places.
I am once again asking for kino paranormal "documentary" youtube channels.
Thank you in advance.
>Bedtime Stories
>The Lore Lodge
I forgot one.
>Bob Gimlin
Noted. Bob Gimlan's channel is pure kino.
>The Lore Lodge
>next to last video as Killdozer kino
Holy shit
he's israeli and is there to discredit real conspiracies. constantly claims to debunk things, he's a lying gay
sasquatch chronicles has loads of eye witness accounts, would make a great streaming series reconstructing the best ones. Some good accounts among all that lot, whatever some of these people saw, it definitely fricked them up
Anyone have that interview with an alien in the woods?
PENDULOUS BREASTS
I found the Buckeye Bigfoot channel when Cam at Dixie Cryptid went on one of his 3 month breaks
>disproven
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_viable_population
Minimum viable population (MVP) is a lower bound on the population of a species, such that it can survive in the wild. This term is commonly used in the fields of biology, ecology, and conservation biology. MVP refers to the smallest possible size at which a biological population can exist without facing extinction from natural disasters or demographic, environmental, or genetic stochasticity.
>These guys just so happened to film the only sighting of this specific kind of bigfoot. No one else has seen this specific kind ever again.
Uh huh. Ok. I believe you, man. What're you selling?
posters ITT that deny he exists are bigfoot btw
I always liked aliens more because aliens actually are real
This guy from a special forces division in the marines in this episode of Cosmic Disclosure from Gaia talks about his experience seeing Sasquatch and the multidimensional nature of them, along with how they are actually playful and hilarious
You need a membership for Gaia but I shared this for free. And I definitely recommend any episode with randy cramer or really anyone on Cosmic Disclosure episodes and the Deep Space series if you’re into this stuff.
https://gaia.com/video/importance-earth
>This guy from a special forces division in the marines in this episode of Cosmic Disclosure from Gaia talks about his experience seeing Sasquatch and the multidimensional nature of them
Did he stutter?
If anyone wants more on a different or related supernatural, ufo/ETs or spirituality subject I’ll share more free links before the thread ends