hollywood is too comfortable with cgi these days look at the scene below, literally jumping through the dino's mouth, it's too much https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fZPKc9Fh5A
>tfw the transraptor lesbians got btfo by the big she-rex
if the raptors were similar to modern birds in the genetic level then they would have not needed to change sex to grow in number because female birds have the chromosomes to make lay eggs to make males
birds are too based for human sexual politics, you wouldn't know this because birds are based and you are not
5 months ago
Anonymous
>birds are too based for human sexual politics
i am well aware so i celebrate anything that proves that birds and mammals have a 360 million difference
and that's not scientifically accurate
the dinosaurs in jurassic park are not real dinosaurs, they didnt have any full dna sequences and had to fill them up with random shit
No. The air sac system is more efficient than bellows lungs (what we have), but the atmosphere still had double the oxygen of today and they evolved taking that into account. The animals would constantly feel winded in today's atmospheric conditions. Plus most modern plants would be poison to them.
wasnt that a particular fruit bearing plant in the movie? i think anon was talking about how most plants in the mesozoic were gymnosperms while nowadays its the angiosperms
So they would prevalently have a good diet in cold conifers-prosperous areas, but also be in a difficult spot to live there because of the temperatures much lower than what they were used to
quite a conundrum
5 months ago
Anonymous
i think for most of the dinos its fine since its a tropical island
cause he made it up. BUT, about 8 million years ago plants evolved to have way more silica to the point that it was harder to digest and would wear down teeth much much faster and it caused an extinction event.
so it wouldnt be poisonous, it would melt their teeth and plug their intestines
Air sacs to absorb prodigious quantities of oxygen, which became modified as oxygen levels increased to enable the metabolism needed to make flight feasible.
The movie explains that the dinosaurs aren’t really dinosaurs, they are hybrid mostly dinosaurs. Imagine a human that’s 90% all human, can talk and walk but has amphibian like traits because the remaining 10% is from frog plug ins. I can imagine they found a way to frick with Dino’s living in our atmosphere. Also movie
"Muh oxygen lebuls" is one of about a million retaded memes in paleontology that don't actually hold any real scientific weight. It's pure cope for why sauropods got bigger than whales because modern humans simply are incapable of believing any time before right now could have been better in any way.
>To erase White Christian Straight Handsome Protagonist Chris Pratt
him and that redhead's ass were literally carrying the whole new trilogy. without them they got nothing.
you really dont get it. they dont care what you want. they hate you and will shove this shit into media till its all you ever see. thats the point of propaganda anon.
Will woke idiots ever learn nobody gives a frick about diversity?
It doesn't magically make a movie better and I don't give a shit if "someone looks like me". Just don't insult my intelligence by putting moronic big nogs in positions they almost never are to be found IRL
They might not care about the money but reputation means everything to them.
Already none of the capeshit movies/series draw barely any attention.
Soon Hollywood israelites will be screaming into a dark hole in the ground for all it's worth.
>hey, you remember that IP that had one good film 30-40 years ago? >>yeah? >and which we've desperately been trying to repeat the success of ever since with increasingly diminishing returns? >>yeah? >what if instead of doing anything new and original, we just kept doing that? >>... yeah, alright
Modern Hollywood filmmaking in a nutshell.
If the film industry wants to survive the next few decades, they need to take all the risk-averse studio execs running the show out to a cliff and throw them over the fricking edge
>diminishing returns
I'd agree with you that there really is only one great movie in the franchise but the three Jurassic World movies made $3.98 billion between them.
Even if the first one made more (factoring inflation) they still make a shitload even if they are bland, boring and uninspired.
>>hey, you remember that IP that had one good film 30-40 years ago? >>>yeah? >>and which we've desperately been trying to repeat the success of ever since with increasingly diminishing returns? >>>yeah? >>what if instead of doing anything new and original, we just kept doing that? >>>... okay, but make it gay and lame
This. >"Sir, the results are in, it's... a disaster." >"DOUBLE THE WOKENESS, IT WASN'T WOKE ENOUGH!"
I bet they try to figure even a way out to remove the dinos completly, after showing them in the first and last 5 min tops.
>If the film industry wants to survive the next few decades
bro the film industry is entirely dead. video games have eclipsed film and music and tv. interactive media is the future and ai-generated self-directed fictional stories are the obvious end game: where the content consumer can choose what the story/characters they are watching/playing in a game are doing, etc.
sooner than you think we will have endless ai generated iterations of all the best/most popular shows out there. AI The Simpsons episodes, AI Star Wars, AI The Office episodes, etc where consumers can just say "I wanna watch a new Star Wars movie about a transgender gungan jedi escaping a nazi concentration camp" and it will just be generated on demand.
Universal is not doing shit with the brand right now just like they didn't do anything special for its 30th anniversary. There's only that upcoming game. it's all dino fans keep talking about and looking at its sister franchis with envy like Cain and Abel.
prehistoric planet did a better job compared to the latest Jurassic world, 65 and that one netflix show.
i doubt the game will do good given how one of its main characters is a poojeta
There's a bit too many documentaries compared with scripted drama. It's like Universal has monopoly on them. There was 65 but I don't know if it had real dinosaur species or just dino-monsters.
Britain had a good go at it but they too squandered it. so apparently the large quad creature in 65 that kept attacking the mc was a Fasolasuchus, a rauisuchian( an extinct group of pseudosuchian) that lived during the late triassic which was like 220 millions years ago(65 doesnt make sense now).
>"what if remake what's already been done, but less white people?"
fast-forward to a week after the remake's release:
>"why are whites so racist with refusing to see this movie?"
Never mind that it was a white guy (Michael Crichton) who created the whole fricking thing. Brown and black people are oppressed unless they're taking what whites come up with.
it was a double edge sword. it made dinosaurs and paleontology popular but it also introduced way too many normies and people who would do more harm than good
>Look out LaShauna the raycist old whitemanasaurus released by incompetent evil old white men is wrecking the the planet by holding back the proud LGBT community.
>diverse and scientifically accurate >HOL' UP SHANIQUA YOU CAN'T GO OUT HERE WITH ALL THOSE CHICKENSAURUSES!
It's funny how "progressivism" has come full circle back to full blown 1940s cartoon racism.
>Oh, so the reason these literal predators were hanging around the babies was because they're actually good Dada who want a baby of their own to raise and love.
>we found that there were a few specific species that appeared to have pinions, therefore every dinosaur was an ostrich despite mummified specimens proving otherwise
Do i care Black person? They killed Dinos for me. Hollywood had two jobs to do to not frick it up for me forever - new Dinos kinos and no reboots of the old ones. Now they do both.
I watched the last one. They brought back the cast of the origial movie and paired them up with the new cast. Not the worst movie, but very bland and inspirationless.
Also: Pratt going Crocodile Dundee on the Raptors everytime is ridiculous.
I wonder if they'd use the scientifically accurate dinosaur colours they discovered
they managed that by analysing the fossilized rest of melanosomes which is rarely found in (more often feathers than skin impression) dino fossils and comparing the shapes they found to melanosomes' shapes in modern birds, which are associated with specific colors
I have a theory that the whole woke inclusivity nonsense has gotten out of control of the powers that be. It was a useful tool early on to kill unionisation but they could never fathom how quickly it'd spread and completely take over the industry. It's a rampant psychoweapon.
That is partially the case. They still have control of when peaceful protests happen and the media but they have absolutely 0 tools to restrain their own mobs since everything that is not of the mob is DevilHitler.
There's a old fable about an artificial monster turning on it's master, cohencidentally.
I dont even bother watching new movies anymore because they all follow the same gay premise: Shove as many non whites and masculine women as you can, and the story comes second. When I see something like this I don't even get mad, because it's been normalized for me. The normalization not being accepting of this, but rather, "I don't watch anything new anyway, because they're all like this". I've simply stopped watching new movies. There's enough media pre 2000's to satisfy anyone for a lifetime anyway.
>No 90s comfy aesthetic >Black folk everywhere >Shit plot
yep
i'm thinking this is gonna be another "go woke go broke"
Jurassic world last 2 movies were already absolute garbage
alright paleontologistbros, someone explain why the frick they think t-rex has feathers now. I mean the whole point of feathers on birds is to help with flight aerodynamics if I'm not mistaken so why would a dinosaur with arms the size of noodles need it >inb4 flightless birds have feathers
they're descended from flightful birds >dinosaurs had feathers for mating displays/environmental protection/whatever
you don't need feathers specifically for that - scales, skin, and hair work just fine, and why would dinosaurs randomly evolve feathers just cause
Feathers evolved first to help retain body warmth as Dinosaurs developed endothermic metabolisms.
Over time they adapted for display and eventually flight.
Feathers could never have evolved just for flight, since they're only useful (at all) for that after already becoming long, strong and complex. Over selection drivers had to have brought them to that stage.
Thermal insulation, useful in all environmental situations
They would be more like developing chick feathers than fully structured feathers, some intermediate form of pic rel
so more similar to a thick version of mammalian fur
What I'm not sold on is that a dino as big as the T-Rex would have a full coat of feathers, big mammals in hotter areas of the world have mostly lost fur, and we know dinos were hot blooded like mammals, so the parallels work IMHO
ah I see, neat
so the pics/drawings of t-rex, allosaurus etc etc being all extra feathery I see around the internet are themselves an already outdated scientifically inaccurate idea? kek
Yeah, the smaller the animal the smaller the ratio of surface area to internal volume, and hence the greater loss of heat. So the need for insulation increases, which is why little birds are so fluffy.
The funniest thing about the dogshit "theory" about feather evolution is that the first unambiguously feathered organism (Archaeopteryx) already has the most advanced feathers present (asymmetrical flight feathers).
>I mean the whole point of feathers on birds is to help with flight aerodynamics
not exactly, feathers never evolved for flight. Feathers main purpose is for thermoregulation and was a trait that was shared by both dinosaurs and pterosaurs( some people do argue that even pseudosuchian). Dinosaurs merely took this feature and expanded it further in the case of the dinos more closer to birds while in general those that evolved larger sizes lost them for obvious reasons. >someone explain why the frick they think t-rex has feathers now
this is old news now but the main idea is that as chicks they had full feathers but would later lose them as adult which is something you can see in elephants as the calf are kinda hairy but the adults only have a few scanty remaining hair.
The only published paper on T.rex skin impressions concluded that all known evidence points to a scaly T.rex
There is no question that some related Tyrannosaurs had feathers or protofeathers, such as Yutyrannus. All claims that juveniles were feathered is only inferred.
It is possible that it varied depending on habitat. Think of the example of Elephants and Mammoths. T.rex, the North American dinosaur of the Late Cretaceous was certainly a scaly beast. That's what the fossil ls say.
Because they're trannies. T. rex never had feathers. There has been an intense push to force every mesozoic reptile into having feathers, but not only is that not true, but it turns out a lot of animals that were thought to have them never did.
>why the frick they think t-rex has feathers now
You are several years late, friend.
We got skin impressions from T.rex and guess what : only scales.
So now feathers gay reverted to >O-Ok, j-just let's say i-it had some sparse f-feathers..
So which one had the better and/or more accurate dinos? are the guesses they took at linking dino behavior with modern animal a detriment or a positive for the portrayal?
Sorry man, whatever they did with my beloved Allosaurus in LOOP disqualifies them completely in my eyes. Also give me your favourite allo depictions in media brehs
mmmhh, actuall I was personally in favour of PP from the start anon 😀 except the weird shit/hypothesis about sauropods neck sacs, that jumped the shark
Jurassic Park is a perfect film. It doesn't need a reboot, sequel, prequel, etc. There's nothing you can do with it (even when assuming you're actually competent) that will surpass the original film.
>diverse
bad. i dont want more Black folk and dykes on screen >accurate
good, im sick of the shitty way they look with their fricked up hands and proportions
It sort of was at the time. This was still in the 90s before the troony renaissance. Jurassic Park was literally the peak of the anatomically rigorous paleoart trend. That's why even to this day the original concept art is some of the most accurate ever made. But the speculative stuff like the Dilophosaurus frill are right from the book and troons seem to forget they served a moral purpose, not a scientific one. They were put there to illustrate that man was fricking with things he didn't understand and black swan occurrences would be the result. Speculative bullshit nowadays is about lookame attention grabbing and uncontrolled sexual fetishes.
>"oh no the dinosaurs have escaped....for the 6th time!!"
The first film already had gender swapping dinosaurs, chud
Its a trans property
>tfw the transraptor lesbians got btfo by the big she-rex
>YWNBARW!
hollywood is too comfortable with cgi these days look at the scene below, literally jumping through the dino's mouth, it's too much https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fZPKc9Fh5A
>Oh my science, the Terfasaurus has escaped from her pen
if the raptors were similar to modern birds in the genetic level then they would have not needed to change sex to grow in number because female birds have the chromosomes to make lay eggs to make males
based birds
feminist btfo
don't bird hate, bird celebrate
they celebrate their W against the hags
birds are too based for human sexual politics, you wouldn't know this because birds are based and you are not
>birds are too based for human sexual politics
i am well aware so i celebrate anything that proves that birds and mammals have a 360 million difference
and that's not scientifically accurate
the dinosaurs in jurassic park are not real dinosaurs, they didnt have any full dna sequences and had to fill them up with random shit
GAY FROGS
FRICKIN' FROGS
Did they ever explain how Brontosaurus and other bigger dinos are even able to exists with way lower oxygen levels?
life finds a way 🙂
Didn't the extra air sacs in dinosaur body take care of that?
No. The air sac system is more efficient than bellows lungs (what we have), but the atmosphere still had double the oxygen of today and they evolved taking that into account. The animals would constantly feel winded in today's atmospheric conditions. Plus most modern plants would be poison to them.
>most modern plants would be poison to them
pretty sure they touched on that
wasnt that a particular fruit bearing plant in the movie? i think anon was talking about how most plants in the mesozoic were gymnosperms while nowadays its the angiosperms
So they would prevalently have a good diet in cold conifers-prosperous areas, but also be in a difficult spot to live there because of the temperatures much lower than what they were used to
quite a conundrum
i think for most of the dinos its fine since its a tropical island
I can see up her shorts
>Plus most modern plants would be poison to them.
Why?
cause he made it up. BUT, about 8 million years ago plants evolved to have way more silica to the point that it was harder to digest and would wear down teeth much much faster and it caused an extinction event.
so it wouldnt be poisonous, it would melt their teeth and plug their intestines
Air sacs to absorb prodigious quantities of oxygen, which became modified as oxygen levels increased to enable the metabolism needed to make flight feasible.
They breathe through their butthole
The movie explains that the dinosaurs aren’t really dinosaurs, they are hybrid mostly dinosaurs. Imagine a human that’s 90% all human, can talk and walk but has amphibian like traits because the remaining 10% is from frog plug ins. I can imagine they found a way to frick with Dino’s living in our atmosphere. Also movie
Don't half our genes overlap with of Bananas?
Not that you aren't correct.
"Muh oxygen lebuls" is one of about a million retaded memes in paleontology that don't actually hold any real scientific weight. It's pure cope for why sauropods got bigger than whales because modern humans simply are incapable of believing any time before right now could have been better in any way.
finally. its been way too long since they did jurasic park
Great. That's what I was asking for.
They are trolling at this point.
The whole idea in the first place is that the dinosaurs became transgender.
You have fat fricks, blacks, Asians, Australians represented.
What more do they want??
If there aren't any ugly black women, it's not diverse.
To erase White Christian Straight Handsome Protagonist Chris Pratt
>To erase White Christian Straight Handsome Protagonist Chris Pratt
him and that redhead's ass were literally carrying the whole new trilogy. without them they got nothing.
>dinosaurs became transgender.
ngl that is the most moronic shit to come out. All they had to do was have a virgin birth
you really dont get it. they dont care what you want. they hate you and will shove this shit into media till its all you ever see. thats the point of propaganda anon.
>What more do they want??
No gentile whites, anywhere, ever.
No white people at all. You know that’s their goal right?
>No white people at all.
It's a fantasy group. When the idea seizes to exist, then they will be victorious.
Will woke idiots ever learn nobody gives a frick about diversity?
It doesn't magically make a movie better and I don't give a shit if "someone looks like me". Just don't insult my intelligence by putting moronic big nogs in positions they almost never are to be found IRL
I'm sure they know, they just don't care
They know. They don't give a frick. They do it to piss off white men and to ruin things you loved growing up. They are agents of chaos.
They might not care about the money but reputation means everything to them.
Already none of the capeshit movies/series draw barely any attention.
Soon Hollywood israelites will be screaming into a dark hole in the ground for all it's worth.
>Will woke idiots ever learn nobody gives a frick about diversity?
Anti woke people give a shit and making them angry is a lot of fun.
>scientifically accurate
So, no dinosaur then because cloning them isn't possible?
Here's your T-rex, bro.
Probably closer to a crocodile's rumble. Or a komodo dragon's hiss.
the one in the film just sounded like an elephant lol
Why a fricking reboot in the first place
>scientifically accurate
when will we get biblically accurate dinos?
So they gonna change their name or something? Doesn't Dinosaur mean terrible lizard?
Obviously fake, and more spam.
>hey, you remember that IP that had one good film 30-40 years ago?
>>yeah?
>and which we've desperately been trying to repeat the success of ever since with increasingly diminishing returns?
>>yeah?
>what if instead of doing anything new and original, we just kept doing that?
>>... yeah, alright
Modern Hollywood filmmaking in a nutshell.
If the film industry wants to survive the next few decades, they need to take all the risk-averse studio execs running the show out to a cliff and throw them over the fricking edge
>let's alienate the audience with years of negative press before release too
>wow you are a true genius
>diminishing returns
I'd agree with you that there really is only one great movie in the franchise but the three Jurassic World movies made $3.98 billion between them.
Even if the first one made more (factoring inflation) they still make a shitload even if they are bland, boring and uninspired.
They've fricked up bigger things, just a matter of time.
>>hey, you remember that IP that had one good film 30-40 years ago?
>>>yeah?
>>and which we've desperately been trying to repeat the success of ever since with increasingly diminishing returns?
>>>yeah?
>>what if instead of doing anything new and original, we just kept doing that?
>>>... okay, but make it gay and lame
ftfy
This.
>"Sir, the results are in, it's... a disaster."
>"DOUBLE THE WOKENESS, IT WASN'T WOKE ENOUGH!"
I bet they try to figure even a way out to remove the dinos completly, after showing them in the first and last 5 min tops.
>"DOUBLE THE WOKENESS, IT WASN'T WOKE ENOUGH!"
Unironically, yes.
People are tried of half measures.
>If the film industry wants to survive the next few decades
bro the film industry is entirely dead. video games have eclipsed film and music and tv. interactive media is the future and ai-generated self-directed fictional stories are the obvious end game: where the content consumer can choose what the story/characters they are watching/playing in a game are doing, etc.
sooner than you think we will have endless ai generated iterations of all the best/most popular shows out there. AI The Simpsons episodes, AI Star Wars, AI The Office episodes, etc where consumers can just say "I wanna watch a new Star Wars movie about a transgender gungan jedi escaping a nazi concentration camp" and it will just be generated on demand.
Will we get gender fluid Dinosaurs?
so black dinosaurs?
>scientifically accurate
kino
A magical BS turned these dinos cartoony. At one point some of them revert into wild beasts. Pretty horrific for a kid.
>scientifically accurate
>scientifically accurate
its gonna be basedence isnt it?
we all know It's gonna flop anyways, never liked the series to begin with
> /tvpol/ falls for the same fake headline -- again.
its fake? cuz it sounds real given how insane things have gotten
Universal is not doing shit with the brand right now just like they didn't do anything special for its 30th anniversary. There's only that upcoming game. it's all dino fans keep talking about and looking at its sister franchis with envy like Cain and Abel.
prehistoric planet did a better job compared to the latest Jurassic world, 65 and that one netflix show.
i doubt the game will do good given how one of its main characters is a poojeta
There's a bit too many documentaries compared with scripted drama. It's like Universal has monopoly on them. There was 65 but I don't know if it had real dinosaur species or just dino-monsters.
Britain had a good go at it but they too squandered it. so apparently the large quad creature in 65 that kept attacking the mc was a Fasolasuchus, a rauisuchian( an extinct group of pseudosuchian) that lived during the late triassic which was like 220 millions years ago(65 doesnt make sense now).
Why are you posting clear fakes if you don't get paid for it?
Frick you morons for buying it. Mark as spam or something.
Since chickens are descendants of the Tyrannosaurus Rex the new diversity hires are going to be killing the T-Rexes and eating them.
They're not
>"what if remake what's already been done, but less white people?"
fast-forward to a week after the remake's release:
>"why are whites so racist with refusing to see this movie?"
Never mind that it was a white guy (Michael Crichton) who created the whole fricking thing. Brown and black people are oppressed unless they're taking what whites come up with.
So a bad movie?
got it
>Diverse
more Black folks
>Scientifically Accurate
For the Black folks too? uh-oh guys...
Jurassic Park was never good.
it was a double edge sword. it made dinosaurs and paleontology popular but it also introduced way too many normies and people who would do more harm than good
No, it was always perfect.
So the dinos will kill only white people?
>Look out LaShauna the raycist old whitemanasaurus released by incompetent evil old white men is wrecking the the planet by holding back the proud LGBT community.
I can't find the article. I'm gonna call OP a gay
>diverse and scientifically accurate
>HOL' UP SHANIQUA YOU CAN'T GO OUT HERE WITH ALL THOSE CHICKENSAURUSES!
It's funny how "progressivism" has come full circle back to full blown 1940s cartoon racism.
The only JP "remake" I'd care to see.
It'd be fun. Can't have that.
>Gadzooks! That ferocious Iguanodon will surely devour the children faster than a tribe of Red Indian savages!
Blessed post Anon
Wasn't it already rebooted? Isn't that what the Chris Pratt ones were?
How the frick did dinosaur feathers become a polarised political statement
>scientifically accurate
That's already got covered
It's funny because Nazis are mentally ill and should be sterilized/killed.
Said the actual lunatic addicted to SSRIs that follows made up pronouns.
>Oh, so the reason these literal predators were hanging around the babies was because they're actually good Dada who want a baby of their own to raise and love.
Ian will definitely be black or hispanic
Alan will probably be white with Ellie as asian for big chink bucks
>we found that there were a few specific species that appeared to have pinions, therefore every dinosaur was an ostrich despite mummified specimens proving otherwise
This here fella sounds a tiny bit racist.
Do i care Black person? They killed Dinos for me. Hollywood had two jobs to do to not frick it up for me forever - new Dinos kinos and no reboots of the old ones. Now they do both.
But what possible reasons could you have to believe that?!
How the frick is anyone still watching Jurassic Park???
Just stop making these movies.
The idea was good for one Blockbuster, but not 10 of them.
I've always wanted to cum in a dinosaur.
>BIBLICALLY ACCURATE DINOSAURS
I watched the last one. They brought back the cast of the origial movie and paired them up with the new cast. Not the worst movie, but very bland and inspirationless.
Also: Pratt going Crocodile Dundee on the Raptors everytime is ridiculous.
why do people care so much about scientifically accurate dinos? they are frog/dino hybrids not "real" dinos
boredom
I wonder if they'd use the scientifically accurate dinosaur colours they discovered
they managed that by analysing the fossilized rest of melanosomes which is rarely found in (more often feathers than skin impression) dino fossils and comparing the shapes they found to melanosomes' shapes in modern birds, which are associated with specific colors
I have a theory that the whole woke inclusivity nonsense has gotten out of control of the powers that be. It was a useful tool early on to kill unionisation but they could never fathom how quickly it'd spread and completely take over the industry. It's a rampant psychoweapon.
That is partially the case. They still have control of when peaceful protests happen and the media but they have absolutely 0 tools to restrain their own mobs since everything that is not of the mob is DevilHitler.
There's a old fable about an artificial monster turning on it's master, cohencidentally.
I dont even bother watching new movies anymore because they all follow the same gay premise: Shove as many non whites and masculine women as you can, and the story comes second. When I see something like this I don't even get mad, because it's been normalized for me. The normalization not being accepting of this, but rather, "I don't watch anything new anyway, because they're all like this". I've simply stopped watching new movies. There's enough media pre 2000's to satisfy anyone for a lifetime anyway.
>No 90s comfy aesthetic
>Black folk everywhere
>Shit plot
yep
i'm thinking this is gonna be another "go woke go broke"
Jurassic world last 2 movies were already absolute garbage
alright paleontologistbros, someone explain why the frick they think t-rex has feathers now. I mean the whole point of feathers on birds is to help with flight aerodynamics if I'm not mistaken so why would a dinosaur with arms the size of noodles need it
>inb4 flightless birds have feathers
they're descended from flightful birds
>dinosaurs had feathers for mating displays/environmental protection/whatever
you don't need feathers specifically for that - scales, skin, and hair work just fine, and why would dinosaurs randomly evolve feathers just cause
Feathers evolved first to help retain body warmth as Dinosaurs developed endothermic metabolisms.
Over time they adapted for display and eventually flight.
Feathers could never have evolved just for flight, since they're only useful (at all) for that after already becoming long, strong and complex. Over selection drivers had to have brought them to that stage.
Thermal insulation, useful in all environmental situations
They would be more like developing chick feathers than fully structured feathers, some intermediate form of pic rel
so more similar to a thick version of mammalian fur
What I'm not sold on is that a dino as big as the T-Rex would have a full coat of feathers, big mammals in hotter areas of the world have mostly lost fur, and we know dinos were hot blooded like mammals, so the parallels work IMHO
its more or less now agreed that the chicks only had them
ah I see, neat
so the pics/drawings of t-rex, allosaurus etc etc being all extra feathery I see around the internet are themselves an already outdated scientifically inaccurate idea? kek
Yeah, the smaller the animal the smaller the ratio of surface area to internal volume, and hence the greater loss of heat. So the need for insulation increases, which is why little birds are so fluffy.
>allosaurus
people draw feathers on them?
The funniest thing about the dogshit "theory" about feather evolution is that the first unambiguously feathered organism (Archaeopteryx) already has the most advanced feathers present (asymmetrical flight feathers).
>I mean the whole point of feathers on birds is to help with flight aerodynamics
not exactly, feathers never evolved for flight. Feathers main purpose is for thermoregulation and was a trait that was shared by both dinosaurs and pterosaurs( some people do argue that even pseudosuchian). Dinosaurs merely took this feature and expanded it further in the case of the dinos more closer to birds while in general those that evolved larger sizes lost them for obvious reasons.
>someone explain why the frick they think t-rex has feathers now
this is old news now but the main idea is that as chicks they had full feathers but would later lose them as adult which is something you can see in elephants as the calf are kinda hairy but the adults only have a few scanty remaining hair.
The only published paper on T.rex skin impressions concluded that all known evidence points to a scaly T.rex
There is no question that some related Tyrannosaurs had feathers or protofeathers, such as Yutyrannus. All claims that juveniles were feathered is only inferred.
It is possible that it varied depending on habitat. Think of the example of Elephants and Mammoths. T.rex, the North American dinosaur of the Late Cretaceous was certainly a scaly beast. That's what the fossil ls say.
t-rex relative probably was fully feathered. Nanuqsaurus is its name
It makes more sense that hair evolved into feathers which then evolved into flight support
Than going straight to flight support
Because they're trannies. T. rex never had feathers. There has been an intense push to force every mesozoic reptile into having feathers, but not only is that not true, but it turns out a lot of animals that were thought to have them never did.
>why the frick they think t-rex has feathers now
You are several years late, friend.
We got skin impressions from T.rex and guess what : only scales.
So now feathers gay reverted to
>O-Ok, j-just let's say i-it had some sparse f-feathers..
>diverse
>scientifically accurate
Pick one
>diverse
I really hope they mean the dinosaurs not the fricking humans
So which one had the better and/or more accurate dinos? are the guesses they took at linking dino behavior with modern animal a detriment or a positive for the portrayal?
Sorry man, whatever they did with my beloved Allosaurus in LOOP disqualifies them completely in my eyes. Also give me your favourite allo depictions in media brehs
mmmhh, actuall I was personally in favour of PP from the start anon 😀 except the weird shit/hypothesis about sauropods neck sacs, that jumped the shark
obviously the one I watched on christmas day 2000
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5718e1
?si=VVxQm_CVKzejlJvI at 1:15
Life on our Planet was really good all round. There isn't too much focus on dinos, though. Only 2-4 out of 8 episodes that focus more or less on them.
Would recommend the whole thing, though.
prehistoric planet. life on our planet is inaccurate as frick. gets lots of shit wrong AND its 90% modern wildlife footage
PeePee has multiple scientific inaccuracies and at least one dead baby dinosaur in every single episode.
>Reboot something that already was rebooted and make it more shitty and subvert the original shit
>feathered dinosaurs = trannies
The memes write themselves.
Jurassic Park is a perfect film. It doesn't need a reboot, sequel, prequel, etc. There's nothing you can do with it (even when assuming you're actually competent) that will surpass the original film.
>diverse
bad. i dont want more Black folk and dykes on screen
>accurate
good, im sick of the shitty way they look with their fricked up hands and proportions
>scientifically accurate
>diverse
>scientifically accurate
soo....
white people and dinosaurs team up to destroy the real threat to society, black people?
>scientifically accurate
Do they not realize that the dinosaurs at Jurassic Park are genetically modified monsters? Authenticity was never a concern.
It sort of was at the time. This was still in the 90s before the troony renaissance. Jurassic Park was literally the peak of the anatomically rigorous paleoart trend. That's why even to this day the original concept art is some of the most accurate ever made. But the speculative stuff like the Dilophosaurus frill are right from the book and troons seem to forget they served a moral purpose, not a scientific one. They were put there to illustrate that man was fricking with things he didn't understand and black swan occurrences would be the result. Speculative bullshit nowadays is about lookame attention grabbing and uncontrolled sexual fetishes.
hopefully we get a more diverse and scientifically accurate Godzilla and Tremors next
fricking retarts.
>Diverse
So they WANT people to not go and see it???