That means nothing, any butthole can get verified. They can also get verified as someone else, then change their twitter handle. Post something from the main Nickelodeon twitter, their website, their facebook, literally anything with their actual name and brand attached to it.
It's mostly just a couple people trading it back and forth to themselves/each other for bigger and bigger amounts so they can bait a moron into thinking he can buy it at a high price and get someone to buy it for even higher. At which point the only other trader who ever owned it with 3-4 accounts just fricks off with the money and the moron has to hope he can find an even bigger moron to buy it from him.
The problem is the only way to profit is to find someone even more moronic than you to buy it from you. And considering the people who buy NFTs in a first place, that's a really high(low?) bar.
It's a digital asset, it won't really "crash" per se. Yes, a $5m NFT got a high bid of $200 at auction because they're fricking worthless, but suckers are still suckers and they aren't willing to admit they got scammed yet.
>wish the reboot didn't suck tho
don't worry, Nick's gonna keep rebooting Rugrats until we're all dead in the grave. maybe the next reboot won't be terrible
Literally, the only way to make this any kind of value is to make it so that the NFTs of the character get screentime in a show, with higher payments meaning more screentime.
NFTs don't have a single real use yet except scamming morons. Every other example is either something that's already doable just as easily or a case of a solution looking for a problem.
assumed this was a shill, but nope, it's actually a scam. misspelled URL, (nickLeodeon versus nickelodeon), instantly asks to auth wallet.
if you're interested in wasting your money, the actual sale is tomorrow at the properly spelled website. it's a bland pfp project where they won't even give you the ugly "mashup" ones unless you buy 2-3 of the even lazier standard looking ones.
That means nothing, any butthole can get verified. They can also get verified as someone else, then change their twitter handle. Post something from the main Nickelodeon twitter, their website, their facebook, literally anything with their actual name and brand attached to it.
>That means nothing, any butthole can get verified.
no
[...]
[...]
[...]
It’s real you homosexuals
https://paramount.xyz/
>paramount.xyz
Damn this one's actually pretty elaborate but still not real. Viacom doesn't even own Paramount.com, why would they own the shitty NFT site based on it? Did you even check what the ACTUAL whois registration info is to see how their web service is structured?
Ok so maybe they aren't trying to scam people. Any more so than NFTs are in the first place. But YOU, OP, ARE. You made a fake website that looks like the real website.
Anyway I already reported it to the FBI, Paramount Legal, Discord, Twitter, NameCheap (lmao are you fricking serious) and Cinemaphile.
NFTs make absolutely no sense to me. What in the frick does anyone get out of buying a license that says you own the original copy of a low quality JPEG? What in the world does that get you?
>What in the frick does anyone get out of buying a license that says you own the original copy of a low quality JPEG?
Oh no you misunderstand. You aren't buying a license. You're buying a cryptographic token that points to a section of the blockchain that contains a URL pointing to the low quality JPEG. It doesn't imply anything about ownership.
Crypto ultimately is a good idea that hasn't found any good footing yet outside of meme coins.
NFT's just fricking suck and the fact so many Hollyisraelite celebs shill it should tell you all that you need to know.
website doesn't say it's live for me (yet).
either way, this looks goddamn stupid.
what the frick
no
it's official.
This can't be real or legal.
Bullshit, post the tweet they announced it in.
>Bullshit, post the tweet they announced it in.
you know how much backlash they would receive if they announced it on their main twitter
>Bullshit, post the tweet they announced it in.
https://twitter.com/nickelodeon_nft
here
verified account
That means nothing, any butthole can get verified. They can also get verified as someone else, then change their twitter handle. Post something from the main Nickelodeon twitter, their website, their facebook, literally anything with their actual name and brand attached to it.
It’s real you homosexuals
https://paramount.xyz/
BLACKFACE
the white camera flash makes it look like these kids are getting their mugshots taken. ....the marketing team clearly didn't think this Gif through.
Arnolds last name is Shortman?
yes it's confirmed
Yep it is, been mentioned a lot of times
stop screenshotting my nfts!!!
Who wouldn't want to own Gerald Johannsen?
>They are already selling for $10,000
Wtf you can make money from suckers that easily?
Only if your quick enough to dump it to some chump before enough people get wise.
Nobody has ever successfully sold a second hand NFT. The only people making money are hackers and minters.
It's mostly just a couple people trading it back and forth to themselves/each other for bigger and bigger amounts so they can bait a moron into thinking he can buy it at a high price and get someone to buy it for even higher. At which point the only other trader who ever owned it with 3-4 accounts just fricks off with the money and the moron has to hope he can find an even bigger moron to buy it from him.
shit, there's a reason why people get into the NFT business no matter how stupid it is, as it is extremely profitable
The problem is the only way to profit is to find someone even more moronic than you to buy it from you. And considering the people who buy NFTs in a first place, that's a really high(low?) bar.
awww yeah rape my childhood harder, viacom.
YEAH BE GREEDIER AND REALLY FRICKING DESTROY EVERYTHING I LOVE YEAAAAAAAAAH
Elon Chuck.
Why does all NFT art look like it was made in a shitty dress-up web browser game from 2005?
00’s Nostalgia is in.
I mean that's just how Klasky Csupo's art style looks like.
I'm ready to crash the NFT market
with no survivors?
ALL MY APES ARE GONE
FRICK
here's the trailer for the NFTs
music by Steve Aoki
Why is this shit still popular, I thought NFTs crashed?
It's a digital asset, it won't really "crash" per se. Yes, a $5m NFT got a high bid of $200 at auction because they're fricking worthless, but suckers are still suckers and they aren't willing to admit they got scammed yet.
>(dot)xyz
Huh?
cheap domain used by a lot of scam sites,
Gabor Csupo is jumping on that NFT bandwagon too.
SOVL
>Gabor Csupo and Arlene Klasky are divorced
>they still worked on the 2021 reboot together
cool, I guess? (wish the reboot didn't suck tho)
>wish the reboot didn't suck tho
don't worry, Nick's gonna keep rebooting Rugrats until we're all dead in the grave. maybe the next reboot won't be terrible
Even Gabor thought the reboot was soulless.
>not wanting legitimate digital collectables that can only increase in value.
I'm buying as much as I can.
Literally, the only way to make this any kind of value is to make it so that the NFTs of the character get screentime in a show, with higher payments meaning more screentime.
NFT's, like the early internet, are still finding their use case, but will explode in popularity. Don't listen to FUD'ers like Dan Olsen.
NFTs don't have a single real use yet except scamming morons. Every other example is either something that's already doable just as easily or a case of a solution looking for a problem.
assumed this was a shill, but nope, it's actually a scam. misspelled URL, (nickLeodeon versus nickelodeon), instantly asks to auth wallet.
if you're interested in wasting your money, the actual sale is tomorrow at the properly spelled website. it's a bland pfp project where they won't even give you the ugly "mashup" ones unless you buy 2-3 of the even lazier standard looking ones.
stupid
>That means nothing, any butthole can get verified.
no
next time photoshop the logo to reflect your fake url
ok why is your URL misspelled then. "Nickleodeon" frick off.
https://nickelodeon.xyz/
Nah frick off with your GoDaddy bullshit.
>paramount.xyz
Damn this one's actually pretty elaborate but still not real. Viacom doesn't even own Paramount.com, why would they own the shitty NFT site based on it? Did you even check what the ACTUAL whois registration info is to see how their web service is structured?
>Viacom doesn't even own Paramount.com
How much are they paying you? You're clearly not the brains behind this operation.
So Nickelodeon NFTs are real, but there's also a scam site selling them right before the mint. This is sad.
Fools and money etc
are you fricking moronic or do you just think we are?
>do you just think we are?
He's a cryptobro, he thinks everyone is stupid except himself.
I literally said >sadly
I fricking hate crypto
>someone point some text on their site
>therefore it must be legit!
LITERALLY FORM THE PRESIDENT OF CONSUMER PRODUCTS AT VIACOMCBS
Ok, explain the misspelled url in OP
Ok so maybe they aren't trying to scam people. Any more so than NFTs are in the first place. But YOU, OP, ARE. You made a fake website that looks like the real website.
Anyway I already reported it to the FBI, Paramount Legal, Discord, Twitter, NameCheap (lmao are you fricking serious) and Cinemaphile.
Don't care, she's probably a moron. If @Nickelodeon does not link to it, it is not official, period.
>.xyz
>NFT
Nah, had pass
Lerald and Helgelica look like Helga and Gerald's love childs.
NFTs are still a thing?
Yes and no. People are still trying to MAKE them a thing, but they were never a thing and never will be.
>NFTs out of classic cartoon characters
Not this again.
Why would I want to buy some shitty art?
Because someone else might buy it off you for more???
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/14/2point9-million-dollar-nft-of-jack-dorseys-first-ever-tweet-plunges-in-value.html
yeah how's that working out for you
advertising or begging
all fields
I just went with illegal content. Regardless of if the NFT project is real, OP is a phishing site.
NFTs make absolutely no sense to me. What in the frick does anyone get out of buying a license that says you own the original copy of a low quality JPEG? What in the world does that get you?
>What in the frick does anyone get out of buying a license that says you own the original copy of a low quality JPEG?
Oh no you misunderstand. You aren't buying a license. You're buying a cryptographic token that points to a section of the blockchain that contains a URL pointing to the low quality JPEG. It doesn't imply anything about ownership.
Any of Angry Beavers?
Where's Doug?
Disney's basement
> unironically bad for the enviroment
>a waste of money
>easily stolen
Yeah no, frick off OP
Report and Sage frick op his shitty scam only works on Facebook/YouTube homosexuals
just bought one thanks OP
Crypto ultimately is a good idea that hasn't found any good footing yet outside of meme coins.
NFT's just fricking suck and the fact so many Hollyisraelite celebs shill it should tell you all that you need to know.
It's so hilarious how many execs got tricked by some morons using buzzwords to blow their company's goodwill on shitty jpegs used for money laundering
I still don't understand, how does this thing even working.