OH N-

Holy crap homosexual go back to the shit hole you came from

>Is actually a troony
Christ, I thought most people were just memeing

Same can be said about that slopchugger called metokur who suck on anything that comes out of modern entertainmaint industry for 3-4 hours straight. Drinker pumps and dumps shit content on daily basis with millions watching while he is at it and it affects your corporate overlord statistics and that is what brings you here of all places to cry about him.

>You don't show examples of people not being sheep minded on his videos.
....Why would he?... Lol you're the one making the accusation, homosexual. Burden of proof is on you. Normal people aren't typically harvesting evidence of people NOT doing something and then sitting on folders full of it to post on Cinemaphile.

>Pretty much anyone knows that you and his fans will suck his dick and accept whatever he says
Source: your salty ass.

The frick did this drinker guy do to rile you homosexuals up SO fricking hard? He makes fricking YouTube videos on movies, like MILLIONS of other people at this point. Judging by this thread at least it seems like a lot of it is legitimate seethe from unironic feminist soiboys who desperately want/need to "own the chuds" or whatever, lol.

>He was inherently wrong to judge before a movie is even out.
Wrong.

They don't do proto-reviews to movies they haven't seen yet.
He was itching for shekels. He couldn't wait for the movie to be out because he knew he could rely on you morons to give him clicks.
Frick off Drinker, you massive gay.

Critical Drinker is doing something right if he makes the right people butthurt.

He didn't. He "reviewed" the trailer and promo material and made some predictions based off that and explained why it DIDN'T have him intrigued/excited.
Why are you trying so hard to find a reason to hate this guy? It's really weird.

>Lmao.
Are you arguing with anon or the strawman inside your head?

>It's not that I'm politically obsessed, it's that he is.
That sounds a whole lot like typical Projection, anon.

>Hollywood shoves leftoid social-politics into every script, either out of genuine ideological dogma or just wanting that sweet sweet ESG/Blackrock money
>CritDrink: "Yet another Hollywood movie with politics shoehorned in. How lame and gay."
>"REEEEEEEEE YOU'RE OBSESSED WITH POLITICS FOR SAYING THAT REEEEEEEEE SHUT THE FRICK UP CHUUUUUUUUUUD"

If I don't phrase it with meme-arrows you chimps literally don't comprehend it. At least if I speak your moron-language I can communicate information to you somewhat.

>CritDrink: water is wet
>a hundred videos later..
>CritDrink audience: OMG WATER IS WET HOLY SHIT!! THANK YOU BASED DRUNKMAN!!! *donates to patreon*

If you need to watch a video of someone telling you water is wet 40 times, maybe you're just not very bright. I'm not mad. The guy's come up with a successful way to make a living, even if it's going for low hanging fruit and relying on repetitiveness.
What I said is that I don't care to watch this content and you got angry about it. I'm not even the only person on Cinemaphile who doesn't think it's good.

>Just stahp pointing out the repetitive nature of my content for the 40th time!! Just STAAAAAHP I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!! That's RAPE!!!!

>why do you HATE drinker??? You're just looking for reasons to HATE him what did HE DO TO YOU YOU BIG MEANIE :~~*(
Send him some superchat donations and reinforce your parasocial relationship, you'll feel better.

>CONSOOM

phonephosting newbie

>Some people just have higher standards
Definitely not the ones crying non stop itt.

Projecting.

Why not invest that money in your own self-betterment?
Why are simps like this?

I barely see anyone unironically defending Prey but one very asshurt anon doing his best to suck e-celeb dick.

there's 79 posters ITT
imo, both the channel and the movie sucked
movie still has some entertainment value at least

Keep saying it. I'm sure through sheer force of will reality will become altered and you will become right.

"He is le sexist and SO ARE YOU" is neither a hard fact or a valid opinion. It's a baseless accusation made because someone is mad, likely a troon.

>nooo, you can’t enjoy a 10 minute video once a week of somebody shitting on hollywood
I wish I could be a true intellectual like you who spends his free time on Cinemaphile arguing with people about aforementioned 10 minute videos.

>If you need to watch a video
Stopped reading right there.
Nobody "needs" to watch this guy's videos, or anyone else's videos, to form an opinion. You're projecting that.
People watch these kind if videos or read movie reviews by movie critics because it interests them, or they enjoy it, or something similar to that.

The fact that you keep projecting this same trait onto others without even realizing that you're doing it is really indicative of you actually being the one that can't think critically, can't form your own opinions, etc.
You assume this is normal, so you assume everyone else is ALSO as much of an NPC as you and that they "need" to get their opinions handed down to them, just like you do.

I just watched Grey Man. Unbearably bland, but what was leftoid social-political about it?

I haven't seen it but you aren't so autistic that when you saw someone say "Hollywood shoves leftoid social-politics into every script" you thought that he actually meant literally, nonfiguratively EVERY script that currently exists, are you? Because that's pretty fricking autistic if you did.

>I pretend casual hyperbole is literal because my chimp-brain doesn't understand nuance/it allows me to bog down an argument. Now where did I put my Facial-Expression Flashcards?

>anyone who says bad thing about based e-celeb is a leftist troon
Why are zoomers like this?

Lol of that's true it's weird how there are trannies ITT still calling him "sexist", "racist", "chud", lol.

>they didn't use that EXACT word so it doesn't count!!!

Lol
Meanwhile:

>Critical Drinker
Opinion discarded. That gay was triggered as soon as he smelled the faintest whiff of a vegana.

>Is that a woman?!?!
>HELP ME FELLOW moronS I'M GOING INSAAAANE!!!! Also, I'm "drunk". AM I FUNNY YET?!

Always complaining about women

This is a guy who has a video called "Why Modern Movies Suck - They're Written By Children", which is followed up almost immediately by "Ghostbusters Afterlife - A Flawed but Sincere Movie for the Fans".
His video "Defeminizing female characters" shows his colors. "She's sexy because she uses her sexiness to disarm men and gain a tactical advantage over them." This is textbook stuff from online reactionaries: a sex object character's sex appeal is used in the plot, so they are a good character.
Of course, this argument fails because a woman's job or utility to the plot has very little to do with the actual extent of their characterization. The "damsel in distress" is a classic action trope wherein a woman is a primary motivator of the plot, but typically damsels have almost no agency or character development because their role is to be tied to a pillar calling out the hero's name.
Critical Drinker can't see the difference because he is a bad critic. He does not base his opinions on a genuine and opened minded viewing of a movie but instead allows his perspective to be driven entirely by traces of identity politics.

>why wouldn’t somebody want to attach themselves to dying legacy media instead of producing their own content
Really makes you think.

With drinker it's different. Not just any old bias but one that is specific to him and that not many people will agree is objectively sound.
He would be shitting on the same movies he claims to like, such as Alien and Terminator 2, if they came out today. Reason being, they have female protagonists. And that's just one example.

>shilled for multiple female-led movies, including Alita.
Yikes.

That's how words work, yes.

>anyone who says bad thing about based e-celeb is a leftist troon
No, it's
>if you're literally having to make up shit to justify hating some random e-celeb that leftist troons hate because he dared express milquetoast non-wokeoid opinions, you're MOST LIKELY a leftist troon
Or it's at least completely logical to suspect that of you.
Nice desperate deflection and strawmanning though, I guess.

That particular anon has definitely been fricked up his ass before.

It wasn’t wrong to judge female Ghostbusters and Anne Boleyn based on terrible trailers. RoP with Black Elves, Dwarves and Hobbits also looks like comedy gold trash based on awful trailers which are hiding the plot.

Your only arguments so have been
>Why don't you make better videos if you don't like his videos?!
Grow up

Because it's not in my interest to do so. You can watch, hate or like anything.
Doesn't mean that as part of the audience, I can't critique his film criticism and overall content.

Go easy on the guy. He’s use to getting lubed up a bit before he gets railed out this hard by a bunch of multiple anonymous men. He’s just a little defensive right now. Sooner or later he’ll realize he’s getting fricked and calm down.

>I WAS PROVEN WRONG SO NOW I MUST SEETHE
lmao just have a nice day homosexual then you’ll never have to cope and seethe ever again

Right, but if he hates modern Hollywood shlock shouldn't he focus on better films instead (older or new ones). Otherwise the channel is inadvertently just another gear in the PR machine.

Any PR is good PR.

Lol literally wrong.
If that were true why did Disney fire Gina Carano?

Why would they want that? Why would they have a financial or ideological interest in that.

>I'm not saying they would
You responded to a post asking why they would do that, and you posted that as your answer.

>fire actress your current audience apparently likes over fricking nothing, generating shit PR, losing a bunch of subscriptions, leaving a bunch of dead-end holes in the scrpt that the writers now have to work around since you just axed a major character that you spent all that time setting up, etc., even getting called out by fricking Forbes for your incompetence
>"lol actually it was a 4D Chess move to get people to watch other show"

This might be the single most moronic attempt at forming an opinion/argument I have ever seen. And that is saying something.

Lol homosexual have you seen their stocks recently? You couldn't have picked a worse time to use that no argument.
But that's completely beside the point. The point is that an irrational and objectively bad business decision is still an irrational and objectively bad business decision whether the company is rich enough to eat the losses or not. Disney STILL lost money and gained nothing. What company, regardless of how rich, tries to make LESS money? One run by morons, apparently.

You mean befire they fired her? Better than it is now, i.e. after they fired her. Ken.
But that's beside the point. You understand that sticks aren't the only place corpos make money, right? Disney objectively lost money because of the decision rather than gained it. That much isn't up for debate.

Did he ever do a bad review that doesn't contain "woke"?

Did he ever do a bad review that doesn't contain "woke"?

His Uncharted review.

>if you accurately describe a grifter's business practices that's.. projection
Keep generating ad revenue while telling yourself you're not consooming goyslop.

He gives a platform to all of these movies. And his own favorite movies are ironically some of that same goyslop.
He has a model and so does the MCU. They're one and the same. The only difference is the political flavor of the content, and Drinker's is more pronounced because his sole identity is to whine about wokeness even when there is no overt use of it.

>How the frick can you do this for different movies? Every movie is different on some level; the same shit doesn't always apply.
That youtuber's lack of understanding this is precisely what the anon you replied to is criticizing. Are you autistic?

>Hollywood keeps doing the same stupid shit
>A critic keeps calling them out on doing the same stupid shit
I see no problem here.
Again, really sounding like you're looking and looking hard for reasons to be mad at this guy.

>omg Roger Ebert did a review where he complains that the characters were unlikable, the plot didn't make sense and the special-effects were bad AGAIN. what a one-trick pony!
You're literally whining about a critic "repeatedly" criticizing movies, lol. That is what a "critic" fricking does.

Again, it's obvious you homosexuals are DESPERATE for reasons to shit on this guy.

>shut up Chud, women are just as capable as men!

>its a movie about space wizards made for children!!!

You are not analyzing fiction, you are seething because women, take your pills

If only the films established to protag as a huntress before the actions start

AGAIN you autistic moronic closeted homosexual: NOBODY IN THIS THREAD THINKS WOMEN ARE CAPABLE. Nobody has ever said that in Cinemaphile, but normal, not closeted homosexuals, can see girls in a movie and not seethe. She didn't beat the predator in arm wrestling or in hand-to-hand combat, she didn't punch him in the face, it doesn't matter, but here you are, seething.

See:

Keep saying it. I'm sure through sheer force of will reality will become altered and you will become right.

You're committing the exact same fallacy he's describing, Anon. You phrased it differently but that was still your argument.
The argument of "OMG who caaaaaaaares about 'realism', it is LE MOVIE! it is LE FANTASY/SCIENCE-FICTION!" is a peak brainlet take and everyone with even a shred of interest in world-building or competent writing or the analysis of fiction knows it.

>doctoral thesis
You went full schizo

>Also "worldbuilding" is a reddit buzzword
"World-building" is a common piece of terminology in fiction-analysis and gas been in use since before the 70's at minimum.

>strawman
Sign of defeat.

>Following that logic

No, not following that logic. Men have done crazy things in warfare/hunting what have you. Women have not. Sorry. You don't get to sit on the sideline for 100,000 years, to the point where it's evident in your very biological makeup, and then pretend it's all the same in the tech era lmao.

It's stupid and fricking cringe, go back to your romcoms and cartoons. Everybody knows what's happening here, it's like the part of a children's movie where they start sticking it to the adults and saving the day or whatever.

No human can feasibly defeat a Predator. It's part of the suspension of disbelief required for the movie. Not "Arnie", not Pocahontas, no one.
If it's that far fetched to you that an alien can get BTFO by it's own equipment, that's your own problem.

Both are bullshit. But that's part of the fun of the movies, the humans somehow survive.

>there has never been a huntress
Starting to doubt your grasp on history tbqh

>there has never been a smart huntress
My point stands.

He is just another homosexual in the closet, he will end up being a troony in a few years.

I dont want anything like that. Notice how you still try to argue as if you were in twitter? i don't give a frick about representation you autistic moron.

It's a movie man, idk what to tell you. Sorry a human female was able to outsmart an alien?

This isnt reddit, nobody in this fricking thread has said or implied anything like that

>remotely close
>remotely close

Duch beat him because he was lucky and found out that he could hide his heat signature. And onec he did he used his experience as a soldier to gain the upper hand.

What's ridiculous is assuming you know everything about a movie before even seeing it.
It's dishonest and he was clearly in need of views and money so he quickly shat out a video for revenue. Why can't this homosexual make his own movies? What use is he to me if he can't fix Hollywood? He won't do it with these videos.

No, he was in need of views and couldn't wait till the movie was out.
He literally depends on Hollywood making these movies so he can make a living.
He saw a female and he immediately made another predictable video about how muh women ruined muh life.

Wrong. Critics don't preemptively do quasi-reviews like that.
It's moronic.

You're just mad his content is shit and I'm calling it out. Keep consooming.

See:

>all this projection
Lol he has a YouTube channel where he talks about movies. He did a video whee he talks about an upcoming movie based on its poorly-recieved trailer and promotional material. And this triggers you for some reason. Likely because your brain is baked by IdMisc so people having the gall to not like/complain about Hollywood wokeoid trends is something you take as a personal insult, so you need to label anyone that does so with every sinister motivation possible.
>GRIFTER!
>RACIST!
>SHEEPLE HIVE MIND!
>SEXIST!
>REACTIONARY!
>REEEEEE REEEEEE REEEEEE!!!
Lmao.

You clearly don't know what a "strawman" is.

That sounds really clever. A shame it has no comparison to movies because even drinker enjoys some (with female leads no less)

>He only pretends to like those
Again, why is EVERYTHING a conspiracy with you people?

This isn't a book, its a movie with trailers. You can absolutely judge a movie buy its promotional material.

>IS THAT A WOMAN IN MY TEASER TRAILER???
>I'M GOING INSAAAANEE AHHHHHH TIME TO REV UP THE SHEKEL GENERATOR AHHHH I'M A israeliteWWW

>being this mad someone calls out my lame predictable content which I don't even wait for to be officially out anymore
Why?

A person could upload 10 hour videos saying the alphabet backwards. He'd be right in doing it. Doesn't mean the content is good.
And in the case of the Drinker, it's so predictable and repetitive, he doesn't even wait for movies to be out anymore. He may as well just start reviewing concept movies at this point.

Not an excuse, considering not all movies are like that.
He'll continue shitting out that content regardless, because he's a mirror reflection of Hollywood blockbusters.
>find a formula that works
>stick to it, and under no circumstances change or improve in any way

But you're not doing that. You're shrieking that everyone that didn't like something are "grifters" and "incels".

Which is a claim you STILL can't back up after 300+ posts.
Just move on and go dilate in the corner or something, holy shit.

Why are you just posting non sequiturs now? Are you having a schizo-breakdown?

>youtuber
>not interested in making a profit
Boy do I have a pen to sell you

>every
No, just his.

>Have you considered the possibility that youtubers aren't in it for the $
Not really

It's his appeal for me, speak for yourself gayit