Ok, the rule is Beast must find someone who can love him, truly, genuinely, love him. All so his curse is broken.

Ok, the rule is Beast must find someone who can love him, truly, genuinely, love him. All so his curse is broken. So, if he was actually in love with one of his servants, could Beast break the curse, or is there a secret rule he can't frick his furniture?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Oh he fricked that furniture. Almost all of it. Splinters in places you didn't think existed. It was just empty sex, though.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see why it wouldn't work, I think it's more on him not seeing his servants as potential romantic interests.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The movie shouldve ended with the Prince establishing a raid on the Fae that caused all that misery, frick em.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Now wouldn’t that go against what he was going through in order to become a prince again? He was cursed for a reason after all.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He was cursed for a reason, but that Witch was a b***h that went scorched Earth and cursed a frick ton of innocent bystanders with her petty character lesson. She deserves the stake.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Beast must find someone who can love him
    >if he was actually in love with one of his servants, could Beast break the curse
    Are you genuinely moronic? The second line doesn't meet the conditions stipulated in the first.
    None of the servants would be able to lift the curse anyway. Because they know what kind of an unlovable c**t Beast is, and they also know about the curse so even the most sincere I Love You would still have a hint of pity mixed in.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking does not constitute genuine love anon. Also there's the fact that the female servants have a relationship with Beast. Unlike Belle, the servants seen the best and worst of Beast so I do think that'll get in the way of them ever seeing him as a partner.

      >Because they know what kind of an unlovable c**t Beast is, and they also know about the curse so even the most sincere I Love You would still have a hint of pity mixed in.
      It's funny you call someone else moronic anon.
      A) The servants DO KNOW that Beast is lovable and can be all these wonderful things but Beast would rather be distant and detached.
      B) Just because they know about the curse doesn't absolutely change anything you. Are you incapable of imagining a reality where a person could ever a love another who is severely disabled or has a condition? Especially without the sense of pitying them as this "poor thing"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He was cursed for a reason, namely being a c**t. And that will never change, no matter how much hyperagressive tardrage you spew.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You act as if people can't change, or people can't learn or grow to view something differently than what they saw it as before.
          > And that will never change
          As I said, it's funny you called OP moronic. Grow up anon.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Grow up anon.
            I'm not the one flying into a frothing rage because someone has a (correct) opinion that differs from my headcanon. I'm just saying.

            Anyway I'm not going to bother replying to you anymore, because I know you will tardrage all the way to bumplimit if I let you.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not mad that you have a different opinion, you're just spouting wrong shit as if it's right.
              >Anyway I'm not going to bother replying to you anymore, because I know you will tardrage all the way to bumplimit if I let you.
              Good, wouldn't want to deal with someone who can't even understand a movie like Beauty and The Beast.

        • 2 years ago
          Smurf-fag

          A minor with no parents around that did not wanted to let a STRANGER in his house.
          And you think the fairy was the good one. she's worse than Maleficent

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            She was some miserable old lady dude, things would've been fine if he had let her in, that's the fricking lesson.
            And don't act like he was some dumb child, if they want us to believe the prince was actually at fault, I doubt he was some little kid who was just avoiding a stranger, he was probably at least meant to be a shitty teenager with an attitude.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Do the math, he was 11.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >he believes the 10 years line from the song
                I REALLY doubt that was meant to be an actual plot point dude (I'm pretty sure it got removed the remake too), again, they wanted us to see the prince as actually responsible for his own shitty actions, not as some kid who was telling a scary old lady to go away because his parents weren't home, he wasn't 11.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Funny enough in the kingdom hearts games there’s a possibility that it was her

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    oh hey mawzipan

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I think when Fifi said "I've been burnt by you before" she meant that lumiere fingered her once and her feathers caught on fire.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You can bet he filled Mrs. Potts a few times. BTW, there's a pic by LBW.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There's also a pic by sssonic2

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Who could resist dat as-feathers

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >as-feathers
      >as

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        One more for the road

        I was stopping mid-word, mang.

        "Sacrebleu! He's getting desperate!"
        https://files.catbox.moe/u0e8sh.png

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What am I looking at, and why does it look like a futa feather duster? Surely that is not the intention.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            If you haven't been following the thread and can't see Beast's hand, I don't know what to tell ya, buddy.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              What does the hand have to do with the dick hanging out from the feathers? Other than providing some kind of weird handjob to the handle part.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well, clearly The Beast picked the feather duster up and stuck his dick IN the feathers and proceeded to frick it.

                Duh

                DUH

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >dick IN
                The dick is exitting the feathers though. It's even jizzing everywhere, just to further illustrate my point.

                If it's meant to be a disembodied dick, adding balls would've been a good idea. Then there'd be no doubt as to where it ends and begins.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                ...get the frick outta here, Tommy.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Tommy
                Figuratively who? Given the nature of the discisson, I'm guessing it's some weirdo from dA.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It's a Goodfellas reference, you autistic mook

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Never watched it. Was too young to watch it while it was in the cinema, too poor to rent it when I was old enough and I stopped caring about 3dpd long before I was old and wealthy enough.

                Why yes, this is my blog. How could you tell?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                By the boo hooing, lol.

                Well take some of that money and go feats your eyes on good storytelling, curticy of Martin Scorsese.

                Then look up the Coen Brothers.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I get that for Enchanted Christmas they wanted a beautiful singing part for Bernadette Peters, hence her Christmas Tree topping character. But why'd they have to erase the feather duster from existence and just have Lumiere flirting with her instead?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they were on a break

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Here's MY question.
    Complete hypothetical, he accepts the Enchantress into his home. What are the odds she fricks him for passing the test?

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It wouldn't work because an aristocrat can't receive "true love" from someone on his payroll. That's why Belle had to come from outside; only a stranger could approach the Beast as an equal and therefore capable of loving him for who he was.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    *feast

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *