ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing. lemme guess: restore the snyder verse?

ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
lemme guess: restore the snyder verse? sell it to disney? shrieking about wokeness? whining that there's too much batman?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not a bad thing. My problem is if you're going to put all this effort in, and you already nuked batgirl. Why not just reboot the whole thing with new actors and a new trilogy of movies?

    Hell. Why not just let reeves do his Batman trilogy and then use that as the jumping off pad for a new DC universe?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      shut the frick up about Batgirl already you moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody gives a frick about batgirl, do you really think an imminent flop movies calls for a full reboot of all their franchises lmao

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        90% of the whole DC movie universe was an imminent flop that called for a full reboot. It's that 10% that actually made money (Shazam, Aquman, Wonder Woman, Black Adam) that's keeping them from just saying 'frick it' and pressing the reboot button with a new cast and 'frick you zack snyder with your killer superman' tone.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's because 90% of DC movies aren't flops like you morons insist. So now you're surprised that this supposedly flopping universe isn't being killed off. Maybe stop living your life on hyperbole mode 24/7 and shit will make sense.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The first ever live action Justice League movie in human history wasn't the biggest Superhero movie bomb in the history of film?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Are you illiterate or did your worthless dad beat your head with a bat as a baby?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Reeves doesn't want his movies connected. He wants to keep them very grounded and gritty for some stupid reason.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah idk why Reeves wants to make movies that people actually like and make money at the box office. What a mad man.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What purpose would Batman existing in some big, dumb goofy ass universe serve? Shared universes do nothing but stifle story telling. If Matt Reeves wants Superman to show up to Gotham, I don't know why it has to be same Superman as Henry Cavill. I've never seen a good argument for why we need a shared universe. We just do because.... we just do, okay????

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >for some stupid reason
        He wants to make Batman movies where Batman and Gotham are actual, living breathing characters and not just set dressing for a generic NYC action thriller or a big dumb alien apocalypse fight. He actually loves Batman unlike you.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >. He actually loves Batman unlike you.

          Then why did he make gotham a generic NYC? If thats loving Batman, I'd rather have a Tim Burton type who doesn't care about Batman but makes an amazing, otherworldly city.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I see you're confused. He's talking about Matt Reeves, not Christopher Nolan. Christopher Nolan is an Br*t so he had no chance of ever truly appreciating Batman so that's why his Gotham is literally just NYC helicopter shots.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Tim Burton's Gotham was great and literally the only memorable part of his movies. Sadly the rest of his movies, like the writing and acting, fricking sucked.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >literally the only memorable part

              You can say you didn't like them, but they weren't the only memorable thing.

              I see you're confused. He's talking about Matt Reeves, not Christopher Nolan. Christopher Nolan is an Br*t so he had no chance of ever truly appreciating Batman so that's why his Gotham is literally just NYC helicopter shots.

              They both looked like a generic city. Begins at least had the narrows, which was dull, but at least something.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The Batman Gotham is a perfect depiction of a modern Gotham. You're just a man child that has the same moronic boomer brain was AVGN. If you like Tim Burton that's your own problem, he'll be dead soon so go suck him off before that happens.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That just looks like NYC

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah Gotham looks like NYC because it was based on NYC. I'm always glad to help out new Batman fans with the history of the series.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                its chicago you false fan

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's actually probably Jersey City.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Burton's Batman literally transformed Batman into DC's biggest property that it is today.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Okay. Now Tim Burton is 90 years old and about to die. Move on and learn to enjoy new things, you autist.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He doesn't give a shit about Batman. He just like Nolan's Batman or like the Batman from Year One and is just copying those. Batman as 80+ years of other stories that Reeves has no interest in. He's trying to tell gritty and grounded stories but at the end of the day it is still a man running around in a silly Batman costume.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >He doesn't give a shit about Batman
            The Batman is still the only Batman movie I've seen where Batman is an actual character having to come to terms with what it means to be a hero.

            Yeah he fricking hates Batman bro.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It was just a shitty TDK ripoff. Just wait until he introduces the Joker with scars on his face again just like in TDK.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The Batman was actually so impressive that I have a feeling that's clearly not the Joker, Matt Reeves strikes me as the type of Batman fan that hates Joker wank. If it was just a shitty Hack Snyder movie then yeah no doubt it's the joker, that's the go-to hack move.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Matt Reeves strikes me as the type of Batman fan that hates Joker wank
                Sounds like you didn’t watch the scene with Joker and Riddler at Arkham bear the end of the movie.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, my point is that that's not Joker. It could be Hush or Clayface. It's called a bait and switch, dumb dumb. Matt Reeves knows Joker is popular and wants to frick with normies who want more Joker.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes, my point is that [headcanon]
                It’s gonna be the fricking Joker all over again bro

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah he loves Batman which is why he’ll completely change characters or outright not use them just to fight his shitty aesthetic.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >completely change characteristics
            From what? Batman doesn't have established characteristics. Fricking dumbass. You can't even elaborate on your point because it would make no sense. Every version of Batman, Gotham, and the characters are different. That's how writing works. Lmao.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Let him finish the trilogy and then bribe pattinson with a bag of cash to cameo at the end of the Superman reboot.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I enjoy Matt Reeves, but he's really clinging hard to that edgy 90's edgelord visual aesthetic for the baddies. A good compromise would be let the Reeves Batman rogues gallery exist in the edgy 90's-verse, and just insert Battinson as needed like a side dish or seasoning. It would be goofy to exclude a main character, but these are strange times.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Reeves Batman is way less succesful than Nolan's

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's also a better batman movie than nolan's

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
    No. It will be funnier to watch your meltdown as the movies come out.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I just hope James Gunn is smart enough to see that every character needs to have movies with their own personality, not just DCEU/MCU-style standardization and cohesion across the board. The Batman feels like an actual standalone Batman movie, not a movie about Batman in some bigger universe. Thor movies are no longer Thor movies, they are MCU movies with Thor in it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Thor movies are no longer Thor movies, they are MCU movies with Thor in it
      That has been Thor comics for decades anon.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Don't recall asking. I don't care about capeshit comics. And what I said applies to any MCU character, FYI

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    GotG 1/2 were meh, and so was his Suicide Squad. No reason to be hyped for anything they make for at least a few years, until they can prove that they can make a movie actually worth watching.
    Disney and the MCU are shit, so don't put that on me.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I can’t bring myself to dickride Gunn.
      GOTG 1 was great, GOTG2 was kinda mid and TSS was terrible, it felt like a South Park episode and not in a good way. Not entirely sure if he can carry an entire cinematic universe

      He's not directing and writing all the movies, dumb dumbs. He's basically just going to be Kevin Fiege with no power.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >NONONONO, ACHSHULLY HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT DESPITE MY OP POST AND EVERYTHING ELSE SAYING TO THE CONTRARY
        kek
        good ol DCEU shills.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He's just the lore consistency guy. He's not making the movies. Idk why you're mad at me for correcting you.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Idk why you're mad at me for correcting you.
            I'm not mad at anybody, but I know autists have trouble with that sort of thing; I'm laughing at the shit you're pulling out of your ass to defend this shit-show called the DCEU.
            >uhh, Gunn's gonna have nothing to do with it; he'll be a powerless Feige
            How do you even know this? Feige was supposedly "powerless," and yet we still ended up with flatties instead of hotties because of him.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              James Gunn isn't making the movies. Take your autism elsewhere. I will be getting the last reply. Also I didn't read your post because I think very lowly if you for having autism.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >James Gunn isn't making the movies. Take your autism elsewhere.
                ...So you have absolutely zero evidence for your "he'll be a powerless Feige" claim? You're conceding that I was right you were just pulling shit out of your ass to defend the DCEU?

                That's genuinely fricking pathetic to bootlick for a company.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                James Gunn isn't making the movies. Take your autism elsewhere. I will be getting the last reply. Also I didn't read your post because I think very lowly if you for having autism.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >plugs and ears and starts throwing a tantrum because somebody caught him in a really stupid lie
                holy kek, what an actual child.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Things that are true:

                I haven't read your last 3 posts.
                You have autism.
                James Gunn isn't making the movies.
                I will be getting the last reply.
                Your reply to this post won't be read either.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Things that are true:
                >You are a tantruming like baby because you got caught in an obvious lie
                >You're lying about not reading my posts because you're too much of a child not to sate your curiosity
                >This is you: "WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"

              • 1 year ago
                guy

                STFU enraged employee, nobody cares that you feel like your vanity career is being ruined and you want to Lash out. Zaslav is a hero and something like what he did is coming for all bad animation and other bad media

                Pedophilia is good and based.

                [...]
                Things that are true:

                I haven't read any of your posts.
                You have autism.
                James Gunn isn't making the movies.
                I will be getting the last reply.
                Your reply to this post won't be read either.

                A new level of cringe

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No one cares what you typed up, lil bro. Go have a nice day.

              • 1 year ago
                guy

                Lul that's one for the screenshot collection. Angry about your career being ruined, but you never changed from being a frustrated unlovable kid.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                new level of cringe

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >He's not making the movies
            He's already said that he's still directing.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Of course, but he isn't directing all the movies you moronic ape.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Gunn was in fact the actual Kevin Feige.
        Him Favreau and yes fricking Whedon were the real power that made marvel into what it was.

        Favreau started it off with Gunn pretty much designing everything up to the infinity stuff, which they #metoo'd him off of because they thought they could mechanically do with his choices what the did with Whedons' directing style.

        Make it into a house style.
        Problem is that no one has any vision other then the creepy as hell propoganda that Disney wants to put out.
        I firmly believe if that surprisingly thick little bulldyke alonzo was kept on a leash and put inher place they could get really good stories out of her.
        Some of the ideas she obviously brought to the mcu are really heartfelt but done terribly terribly wrong.

        And feige is just a baseball cap wearing suit who takes credit for shit and has proven he doesn't know what the frick he's doing.

        Just have feige as the suit. Get some big dick chad with good ideas to dick alonzo till she turns into a good little office b***h who knows her place and they can get some good shit going.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >feige is just a baseball cap wearing suit who takes credit for shit and has proven he doesn't know what the frick he's doing.
          I've been calling MCU movies shit since pre-Avengers 1, but he consistently made Disney multi-billions for a decade. You don't repeatedly trip into that kind of success.
          It doesn't matter how little I think those movies are good, because they're objectively successful.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >he consistently made Disney multi-billions for a decade
            What did he do other then be in position to soak up credit?

            If he can't keep the gravy train going and is proving that he litterally doesnt know what sells or what he's doing then he had basically nothing at all to do with Marvels succcess.

            No really.
            What did Feige personally have a hand in when it came to the success of the MCU IP.

            I'll wait.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >He's not directing and writing all the movies
        Are you suggesting that we can't look to his previous moves for information about his future style? What he likes and dislikes?
        >He's basically just going to be Kevin Fiege with no power
        Simping for a guy with no power.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I hope he does just to make your autistic ass seethe into oblivion.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Does what? I'm not going to be watching and MCU/DCU movies. Unlike the rest of you losers, I don't use tv and movies as the basis for my personality. Whether some shitter on Cinemaphile does something or a director/producer does something, changes nothing in my life.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I did not read a single word of your post. That's how little I think of you and your Asperger's syndrome. Thoughts?

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >gaming
    Is this why the CEOs of Rocksteady left?

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I can’t bring myself to dickride Gunn.
    GOTG 1 was great, GOTG2 was kinda mid and TSS was terrible, it felt like a South Park episode and not in a good way. Not entirely sure if he can carry an entire cinematic universe

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >was kinda mid

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I like James Gunn, but he cannot do serious. Not everything has to be funny.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He's not directing and writing every new DC movie, dumbass.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Superman is into poop porn
      >funny

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If Superman has a fetish then it most likely is femdom. Lois must own a collection of Kryptonite strap-ones.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Superman's only fetishes are truth, justice, and the American way.
          Do not sexualize awesome Clark.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        how long are snydertards gonna be triggered about this joke?
        the point is that Superman doesn't actually have a poop fetish, it's that Peacemaker is an unhinged idiot who would spread a rumor like that

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Snydertards SEETHE at a harmless poop joke but are fine with Snyder inserting his NTR fetish and having Supes rise his wife’s son with Batman

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The joke is that Peacemaker is a crude butthole who doesn't even respect arguably the closest thing to a perfect man.

          The "jokes" turns out to be true according to the ending of Peacemaker when Wally confirms that they're true.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Wally
            I see what you did there

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, Snydertards have no brain please understand.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The joke is that Peacemaker is a crude butthole who doesn't even respect arguably the closest thing to a perfect man.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I thought it was a Chris Chan edit.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The only bad thing about this is that they are making their bible now instead of 8 years ago.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
    Because Gunn is just Nu-Whedon; he's just a gayer Whedon, too.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The Suicide Squad was great
    >but the box off-
    Don't care. I decide if something is good or not

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    James Gunn's ex wife fled Hollywood forever when she found out the truth about her husband

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        James Gunn's ex wife fled Hollywood forever when she found out the truth about her husband

        Don't care didn't ask.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          These posts weren't meant for you.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        [...]
        James Gunn did nothing wrong. He's a great guy!

        So the DCEU is going to be run by a pedo and pajeets are celebrating.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Their other idol is "clearly-obsessed-with-homo-latex-SM" Matt Reeves

          go figure

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/tDAUJfH.jpg

      ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
      lemme guess: restore the snyder verse? sell it to disney? shrieking about wokeness? whining that there's too much batman?

      James Gunn did nothing wrong. He's a great guy!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        James Gunn's ex wife fled Hollywood forever when she found out the truth about her husband

        Why are Cinemaphile incels so triggered by tepid edgy jokes you'd see on /b/?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          why are groomers so eager to normalize pedo jokes?

          [...]
          [...]
          James Gunn did nothing wrong. He's a great guy!

          Why are Gunn fans ok with Gunn's friendship with convicted child pornographer Hudson Huddleston? The hundreds of pedo joke tweets combined with his friendship with a convicted child pornographer, plus the fact that Gunn goes to "To Catch a Predator" themed parties in his free time dressed as a Catholic priest all seem a little sus. This is the guy DC Studios made the new head of their studio though, maybe they know something I don't.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            [...]
            [...]
            James Gunn did nothing wrong. He's a great guy!

            James Gunn's ex wife fled Hollywood forever when she found out the truth about her husband

            https://i.imgur.com/tDAUJfH.jpg

            ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
            lemme guess: restore the snyder verse? sell it to disney? shrieking about wokeness? whining that there's too much batman?

            [...]
            So the DCEU is going to be run by a pedo and pajeets are celebrating.

            James Gunn-the Woody Allen of capeshit movies
            https://forums.mixedmartialarts.com/t/james-gunn-outed-as-a-pedophile/2730689/280?page=16

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              James Gunn is a pedophile? Based. So am I.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Pedophilia is good and based.

              Things that are true:
              >You are a tantruming like baby because you got caught in an obvious lie
              >You're lying about not reading my posts because you're too much of a child not to sate your curiosity
              >This is you: "WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"

              Things that are true:

              I haven't read any of your posts.
              You have autism.
              James Gunn isn't making the movies.
              I will be getting the last reply.
              Your reply to this post won't be read either.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                James Gunn is a pedophile? Based. So am I.

                lefties are pedos

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Woody Allen of capeshit movies
              So innocent?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Brother you're on a website where half the posters are some flavour of pedophile.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Its definitely creepy but I don’t think is something worth causing controversy, in the end there wasn’t any grooming or child harassment involved.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            his personal life is none of my bussines if he makes good movies thats all i care about but this is capeshit so he probably doesn't

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Cinemaphile autists have this weird compulsion to place everyone under standards they themselves could possibly ever meet.
          Like imagine seriously crying about James Gunn making edgy jokes, while you're on Cinemaphile. You have to be so autistic that you just don't have any self awareness at all.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's probably just reddit tourist or anons falseflagging. Don't pay to much attention to it and laugh at them.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
    WBD is already going down and they are fixing shit a few years too late.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They're picking up the pieces of an already shitty universe without a plan. Why would I be excited?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      So the DCEU is going to be run by a pedo and pajeets are celebrating.

      I don't think the DCEU is a thing anymore dude. Idk why people even pretend like it's been a thing after Snyder left.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because it's still literally the same universe. Black Adam just came out & Aquaman 2 is next.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The Batman isn't, and neither will new DC movies. Those movies were already in preproduction before this entire shitshow.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The Batman isn't getting a sequel till at least 2025. Joker is also an outlier but the main focus is still the snyderverse.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >still
              Again, you're talking about movies that have been in production for years now. You're delusional if you think James Gunn will be using the DCEU as the backbone of DC movies that will be coming out in 2025 onwards, like The Batman.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No evidence to the contrary & productions can be cancelled. Yet Blue Beetle is still in production right now along with other projects planned for the snyderverse movies.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Proof Blue Beetle is a snyderverse movie?

                For the fans watching at home, his reply to this post won't have proof.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >like The Batman.
                Which won't be connected to a greater DC universe and can't be a backbone.

                There's a difference between "Gunn will stick to the general DCEU even if there'll be retcons/loose continuity", and "The Snyderverse and the original plans will be restored"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The way I see it, the DCEU died with Snyder. Not even WB uses that term anymore. Why does everything have to be restarted? What do you even mean by that? Do you mean recast? Because that's the only thing that gets carried between DC movies.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't say anything about restarting.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                My point is I don't even know what the DCEU even is in this context. Is the DCEU just when Henry Cavill is dressed as Superman? So now any DC movie where Henry Cavill is Superman is now a DCEU movie? These are just DC movies. The distinction makes no sense anymore.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They're all movies in the same vague canon, connected universe, simple as that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What canon? The only thing that gets carried between DC movies is casting choices. Idk how that makes a universe. So if someone else plays Superman and Wonder Woman it's a new universe now?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Again,you're thinking too hard. These movies are seemingly something like James Bond in 1962-2004 going forward. Don't sweat the little things.
                There's no reason to believe all these movies are a completely new universe unless otherwise said they're separate, like Joker or The BAtman.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You're thinking too hard
                You are by having this autistic distinction between DC and DCEU movies. There is none. They're all DC.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, you're the one trying to get this "gotcha" moment in about them all being DC movies. Whether its DCEU, the DC movie universe, the Gunnverse, whatever they call it, the point is they're keeping that line of movies all more-or-less together in one continuity.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Keep saying DCEU as if typing out "EU" means literally anything, homosexual moron. They're DC movies. Get over yourself.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes they're DC movies, the connected ones for the time being.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                None of them are connected anymore. They just have actors playing specific characters. That's not a universe. That's just called casting. There are no meaningful story elements that carry over between movies. I'm sorry you're just now learning the DCEU has been dead for years now.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    are you psycho losers capable of having any real conversations about comics & movies?

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >pedospammer mogged hard and ran from the thread
    Kek

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gunn is a pedo

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      lefties are pedos

      I'm a pedo too.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder if Gunn and Ezra have molested some little boys together yet

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Gunn is a pedo

      [...]
      lefties are pedos

      I support pedophilia therefore I support James Gunn.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that would be so hot, they could dress as cowboys :3

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >DC is finally building a bible
    >except for their comics
    Were DC fans the Mongol Horde in their past lives? What in the actual frick did you guys do to deserve this shit?

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's a bad thing because they didn't ask me, specifically to fix their company. Only I can save DC.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not really a fan of Gunn's interpretation, or even the way he really does things. Suicide Squad wasn't a bad movie but really just wasteful in the beginning. I don't know who Safran is.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hate movies

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Movies are better than homosexual cape comics and cartoons.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    More superhero movies is always bad. Also Gunn sucks ass.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Superhero movies are better than superhero comics.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes you hate everything, why would you like this?

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How are 100+ posts in and homies still think James Gunn will be making these movies?

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there is no way they can turn DC movies fate anymore

    they have a lot of active movies and sequels, bunch of unconnected movies

    what are you going to do at this point?
    you cant kill everything because then nobody will work with you and rest of actors already mcu actors so

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The Batman made $800m and it's unconnected.

      Why do you autists think everyone demands MUH SHARED UNIVERSE shit like you do? Most people just want a solid ass movie first and foremost.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think that's his point, you can't easily just cancel shit like that on a whim easily since it'd piss off a lot of people you're working with. DC is still trying to play like they can be the MCU when they can't even decide what they want to commit to. Do they want to make stand alones? Do they want to fix the DCEU they already have? What will be connected to what? They don't know the answer to any of this shit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >dickriding that shitty movie this hard
        I feel pretty bad for people who unironically believe there's going to be a sequel for The Batman or that Pattinson's going to reprise his role.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This board is infested with trannies and roasties, of course they would overhype that shit homosexual twink Battinson.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Considering Batman is their most popular character and it outgrossed by Doctor Strange, barely outgrossed Thor and will be outgrossed Black Panther. That’s not great.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Considering it's their most successful DC movie since Joker, yes it's great. Why do you think they immediately kneeled to Matt Reeves and gave him a movie deal? He fricking won.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Superheroes and their adaptations have been a disaster for popular culture.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Having a sense of direction should have been the first thing done long ago. Doing so now is the next best time.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    im so goddamn tired of snyderbots

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's not, but they need to execute individual movies well and understand that the Trinity is the key
    DC has been gifted with a set of main characters that everyone will immediately accept. The 8-10 story should center around them and branch off into other aspects of the universe when possible

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >why this is a bad thing
    Everything will become homogenous and lose all creative liberties and soul to ensure it all fits the branding of a collective DCEU
    A bible is fine for a single project but having all works be forced to reference (cartoons, movies, games etc) is just a fricking terrible idea.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Marvel's MCU synergy killed my interest in the animation and games mostly. It'll suck if DC is going that route because the variety of animated shows and video games is what made them stand out. And the shitty synergy was already creeping in when they forced Rocksteady to make a Suicide Squad game instead of Superman one and based the team off of the DCEU versions.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >giving gunn more power
    wow sure can't wait for this to backfire

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it's not a bad thing to have a plan, it will all depend if the plan is shit or not lmao
    wait for details to come out, then we'll see if it's shit

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i just thought that WB's ongoing support of animated projects was interesting and Discovery's exec declaring that they brought in the Good MCU Guy so they can Become Marvel isn't really compelling to me.
    I felt pretty done with marvel. I watched a few of their mcu shows halfway through and ultimately just lost interest. The support of unconventional things like primal felt novel.

    I mean, why be excited? Zaslav's mission statement is "no more frivolous creative ventures, all franchises." he named Friends of all things as one of the juggernaut franchises he acquired. Gunn will probably make some funny, charming things, but the executive direction is just "produce slop."

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Should be James Wan in charge

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *