Once again Viggo Mortensen fails to disprove the falsehood that he is not incapable of being in a film that isn't kino.
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Once again Viggo Mortensen fails to disprove the falsehood that he is not incapable of being in a film that isn't kino.
>fails to disprove the falsehood
i think you should have a nice day dilbert
Crimes of the Future was shit
>fails to disprove that he is not that isn't
Viggo is always kino.
What do you suggest he does to disprove it
You can't disprove a falsehood
Yes you can, if you couldn't it wouldn't be false, dug
>Once again Viggo Mortensen fails to disprove the falsehood that he is not incapable of being in a film that isn't kino.
Once again Viggo failed to disprove he’s capable of being in a bad movie.
Right?
>fails
So he fails to do something
>To disprove
So something is still possible
>The falsehood
So a falsehood is still possible
>He is not incapable
So the falsehood is that he is capable
>Being in a film that isn't kino
So there is a possible falsehood that he can be in a bad film, so it is yet to be shown that he can be in a bad film
You idiots will argue about anything.
2 + 3 = 6
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like, other than Viggo didn't.
I'm not even going to attempt to understand this.
There is something fricked up about Vigger’s face, I think it is the eye area.
The only other person I’ve seen with eyes like that is the Minbari b***h from Babylon 5.
Ideal human face is attractive/proportionate with some unique or "weird" stuff goin on
RIP
she was a total piece when she was still a bald alien, weird how the 90s hair knocked her down so many points. great actress though, rip
also this
Means no
I don't know what you're saying but he's been in both great and terrible movies.
Yeah but he's still a shabbos goy so frick him
I do not know anymore if im the moronic one
4 negations means truth right?
is that a quadruple or a quintuple negative?
>Viggo is not not not NOT not not not good...
Who can cypher this?
>once again fails to disprove
so he proves
>the falsehood
the lie
>that he is not incapable
that he can
>of being in a film that isn't kino.
be in a bad film
So here goes. There is a rumour going around that Viggo can be in a bad film. Viggo has once again proven that statement to be a lie.
I disagree. I watched some british film where Viggo played a russian mobster and got a knee tattoo, and had a love interest with a coalburner who had a miscarriage. That movie fricking sucked balls.
Once again Viggo Mortensen proves he is incapable of being in a film that isn't kino.
>two negations means they negate each other
stupid anglos, any other language can chain negations and keep the meaning negated
learn something from your Black folk please
why is crimes of the future being released on different dates in different countries?
That’s too many negations for me to bother trying to understand your post
Didn't OJ write a book called "I didn't not not kill my wife: A semi-fictional story (if it was opposite day)"
I agree.
This dude has only ever been in shit films.