Only the funniest failures may be posted in this thread

>Budget: $40 million
>Box Office: $694,782
>Release Date: December 12, 2008

>Fathom Studios began development on Delgo in 1999; animation work began in 2001. In a 2001 interview, Marc Adler said that the film sets itself apart from other recent computer-animated films because it is not a comedy and also because it is "a very human story told in a non-human world". Chief Animator and Artistic Director Derek Winslow went on record in the January 2001 issue of US weekly, stating that "Delgo would be his finest creation" and "would outperform Shrek at the box office".

AAARRRGH

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    James Cameron ripped off Delgo.... What a fricking HACKITY HACK.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    honestly, this is what i see when i see any advertising for avatar

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Holy shit these faces look like basedjaks

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Distinctly Black faces.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Distinctly Black faces.

        the two on the right literally look like Black folk. who would want to watch that?

        >the two on the right literally look like Black folk. who would want to watch that?

        > west african limb / sudanese proportions, dreads, full lips
        > tribal

        YEAH! You get em tiger! NO ONE would watch

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They look like really tall white people cats.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Anon. The non-Jake Na'vi all have heavily Native American features.
          That's quite the far cry from Black folk in the national mindset.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They whitewashed $38 million anon, it was a great succes

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why did it take 7 years to be finished?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Stock in production hell probably

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I worked on Delgo. It was a combination of inexperience and arrogance. Originally it was to be a movie about ants but then Antz and Bug's Life came out so it was decided having an ant movie several years later would be stupid.
      Everything was tossed and started over. Then it took a long time to staff up. ~~*Adler*~~ is a cheapwad who thought by producing in Atlanta he could get animators for cheap from SCAD. It didn't work out that way so they had to pay to recruit from existing studios and from schools elsewhere.
      Then there was the render farm. As originally built out, it would have taken over a century to render the entire movie. He simply didn't bother doing the math and took a guess at how much hardware would be required. This was especially stupid because downstairs in the exact same building as Fathom Studios was a tech company called Macquarium that he also owned. Any of the H1Bs (he only hired cheap foreign labor) could have done the math for him.
      Once it became apparent that a couple of servers in a closet wouldn't be able to render the movie in a reasonable timeframe, money had to be raised. His daddy, the source of Adler's wealth, didn't want to sink more money into the movie so he lined up some investors and got a sponsorship from Dell for heavy discounts on servers.
      Once the movie was done, the distributor saw it was a trainwreck and pulled out. More money had to be found to get a "pay for play" distributor that essentially would rent screen in theaters. The money for this ate up the entire advertising budget so the movie was released on 2000+ screens with no advertising in hopes that people would see it randomly and then world of mouth would cause it to become a hit. It is estimated that for every showing of Delgo, there were two paying customers.
      And yes, the rumors about Jennifer and her services to the production staff are true.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Jennifer?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Delgo blowjob lady. I remember the last thread.s
          https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/144253645/#144288571

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >The money for this ate up the entire advertising budget so the movie was released on 2000+ screens with no advertising in hopes that people would see it randomly and then world of mouth would cause it to become a hit.

        Okay, thanks that explains a big mystery of the film. The film came out of nowhere, and no one even knew about it. The complete lack of advertizing is the most baffling thing. The only thing people saw was the poster and of course it's ugly Black reptiles so they were repulsed by it.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What is money laundering

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Budget: $150,000,000
    >Opening Weekend: $6,914,488

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      OOF

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Will we ever get animated mocap kino again? did this kill the genre?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It seems so. Robert Zemeckis was pushing it with Beowulf, Christmas Carol and Polar Express and he stopped doing those movies after that.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Will we ever get animated mocap kino again? did this kill the genre?

          Because after that failure they basically shut his studio down. He had been developing a mocap animation remake of Yellow Submarine.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >he company had previously been reported to have Calling All Robots,[9] a Yellow Submarine remake,[10] a Roger Rabbit sequel[11] and The Nutcracker[12] in development. Disney dropped all of these projects following the box-office failure of Mars Needs Moms.[13]

            LOL I mean, the movies they were making were okay for the novelty of it, but they never thought about how people didn't like the uncanny animation even as far back as Polar Express and Christmas Carol.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I feel like those worked more cause the atmosphere were kino and they were simple Christmas stories.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Zemeckis tried it again with Welcome to Marwen. I don't get why, though. Motion capture sort of takes away the artistry of actual animation. While watching Polar Express or A Christmas Carol I was thinking "why not just do a live action adaption?" It's not like there's anything that actually needs to be animated. Some of the worst moments of those films might have actually been impressive if they were done with real choreography and practical effects.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This movie is so funny to me because the takeaway of the studio was that it flopped because of "Mars" being in the title. Kids are just really not into Mars these days.
      Definitely not "mom". Kids will always love watching movies about their mom.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        i guess they expected moms to drag their kids to it to watch since it had mom in the title. i remember this coming about and just being completely turned off on it. horrible title. i actually have no idea if the actual movie even has anything to do with moms or in what sense

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Or the fact that it looked ugly as shit

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/BicAeM8.jpg

          >Budget: $40 million
          >Box Office: $694,782
          >Release Date: December 12, 2008

          >Fathom Studios began development on Delgo in 1999; animation work began in 2001. In a 2001 interview, Marc Adler said that the film sets itself apart from other recent computer-animated films because it is not a comedy and also because it is "a very human story told in a non-human world". Chief Animator and Artistic Director Derek Winslow went on record in the January 2001 issue of US weekly, stating that "Delgo would be his finest creation" and "would outperform Shrek at the box office".

          AAARRRGH

          im starting to see a trend. make your characters look like Black folk and no one wants to watch it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            So what you are saying is, every movie must have an ugly Black as a main character one way or another
            Gotcha.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This. Frozen made two billions just by the virtue of having a beautiful princess as its main character.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              you're autistic

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Not really

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Then move out of your parents house already.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Must suck having no familial ties

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                what? hes absolutely right. the story doesnt even make sense because they scrapped it mid way through and changed everything. its still great since it has hot white girls in it though and no Black folk

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >its still great since it has hot white girls in it though and no Black folk
                Not Frozen 2

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i know and no one liked frozen 2. i tossed the movie after we watched it because of all the Black folk and f*male soldiers along with the pants on heard message of white people need to kill themselves so magical Black brownoids can live happy

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You are mentally ill.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I think the autistic one is the one that doesn't understand the innate desire of little girls to see themselves as pretty princesses.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I YIELD,I YIELD.MERCY

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >let's make our characters look as close to the stuffed toys we plan to sell millions of so we can make even MORE money

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This is the one movie I ask all my friends if they want to marathon. They always say no

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          There was a time any moronic 3d movie would make 100 million. This is because people would take their kids to the mall, eat and watch a movie to kill time in the summer.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I think it was just bad

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Bad movies can still have big opening weekends before word of mouth hits, especially kid's movies, so focusing on the most superficial elements does make sense to explain

          >Budget: $150,000,000
          >Opening Weekend: $6,914,488

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This movie probably contributed to the flop of Bird's "A Princess of Mars" - er I mean "John Carter"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Bird's "A Princess of Mars" - er I mean "John Carter"
        Brad Bird? He didn't direct John Carter, another Pixar alum did, Andrew Stanton.

        Brad Bird directed TomorrowLand, yet another terrible Iger-era Yidsney flop.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Tomorrow Land was TED Talk The Movie but John Carter ruled.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            unrelated to tomorrow land, but kino

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This is the first time I’ve heard of this movie

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They named a movie Tomorrowland when the biggest music EDM festival of that time was also called like that.
          I think most of Disney flops are because the execs have a "too big to fail" mentality and think their products can topple over already established concepts.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Want it based on an existing ride?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, but one that was made in the 50s as a look forward into future tech that was located in EPCOT. The place hasn't been culturally relevant to anyone but disney ride design nerds in a couple generations. If you asked a group of people in the early 2010s if they'd ever heard of Tomorrowland more than half would probably say no, and the remaining would be split between old people who remember EPCOT and younger people who are into electronica. Hell if you asked now you'd probably get more respondents citing the festival or the old EPCOT exhibit than the disney movie.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          George Clooney has probably the worse hit to flop ration out all the “A-listers”. Plus he’s a one note actor. Bobble-head is not even a israelite. So how the frick does he have $500 million in the bank? And I’m not talking about his booze company. How did all the gigantic flops in his career led him to be among the highest grossing movie stars, enough to being able to start a large business of his own?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Cos he got paid big for those flops and isn't a wasteful spender?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Oceans

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Calling it "John Carter" instead of "John Carter of Mars" I maintain was one of the biggest factors in it flopping, the former is a random nondescript name that means nothing to anyone, the latter is at least immediately a sci-fi tale.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Still can't believe that the director actually wanted that name because John Carter was not "of Mars" yet and nobody questioned it especially after there's the movie Coach Carter and nobody thought people would confuse the names.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Should've just been called A Princess of Mars to be honest. Might've gotten more women to see it, and it's just an objectively cool title. There's a belief that boys are turned off by princesses but I think ERB knew better than most anyone about what boys fantasize about. Who doesn't want to sweep an exotic alien princess off her feet.

            A deeper issue than the title: it was a mistake to not be influenced more by Frazetta's Barsoom. The visuals and art design got better as it went along but a lot of Mars looked too much like the Southwestern US. Combined with the title, I imagine a lot of people didn't even realize it was meant to be take place on an alien planet at all after seeing the trailer.
            It was like an 8/10 still, don't get me wrong.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, I watched it a while back and it's a fine adventure movie. Calling it A Princess of Mars would probably have helped it if anything and they could easily have the promotional material show that it's not just about the princess.

              Haha I never noticed how much Mars looks like a generic desert. Even a reddish tint over the outdoor scenes could've helped as would being more inspired by Frazetta depictions and others to give a more exotic feel.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >There's a belief that boys are turned off by princesses but I think ERB knew better than most anyone about what boys fantasize about. Who doesn't want to sweep an exotic alien princess off her feet.
              It's kind of a moot point because obnoxious feminism was injected into the script at that trashed the whole saving a princess, heroic thing.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >It's kind of a moot point because obnoxious feminism was injected into the script at that trashed the whole saving a princess, heroic thing.
                It's been a long time since I've read any of the Barsoom books, but if action girls are "obnoxious feminism" then Edgar Rice Burroughs himself was frequently guilty of it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Is it just me or was this movie never even advertised.

            I heard about it for the first time after it was already out of theaters, and I would have actually MAYBE been interested in seeing it because I had actually read some of the books as a kid.

            Why is Hollywood always shocked when movies they don't advertise or promote in anyway turn out to be complete flops. NO SHIT! You're keeping the product a fricking secret from the fricking customers and you wonder why sales are bad?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The first time i saw it was in a dentists office apparently like 3 years after it came out

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Im pretty sure John Carter ads were everywhere lad. Were you under a rock?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          naming films after the main character has gotten out of hand
          >jack reacher
          >alex cross
          >michael clayton
          >john wick
          >jonah hex
          >larry crowne
          >hanwiener

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      At least we got some hot Martian booty

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Or the fact that it looked ugly as shit

      At least we got some hot Martian booty

      Movie sucked but Ki's huge ass and her hourglass figure were worth it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The manchild won hard in the end, he gets to pound her fat assed alien gf

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oh this is all uncanny vally. The humans look just slightly off but realistic then you have cartoony characters in there too. the martian has a nice fat ass but can't recoop that her face is cartoony and inhuman looking.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        brehs.....

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            that's a damn perfect bubble butt

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Everytime I see this title in my mind I change it to Mars Needs Mammies.

      It amuses me.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Mars needs MILFS for me

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know why but this damn movie keeps making me bust out laughing.
    It being a passion project and looking so shit and flopping on such an unprecedented scale is just so funny

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      happens when someone completely overestimates their level of skill and doesn't have anyone around them to give good criticism. many such cases

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the two on the right literally look like Black folk. who would want to watch that?

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    hurm

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >argonian family encountering the last dunmer in vvardenfell.jpg

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I remember seeing this at the theatre on release. Me and my mate couldn't stop laughing.
        It was the era of cutting corners in CG.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          just seen the name lost in space still makes my balls tingle. fist waifu

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The CG monkey?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >It was the era of cutting corners in CG.
          it was worse than that, originally the scene with Malbolgia was just going to be Al Simmons in a dark room with a light shining on him making him the only thing visible, and Malbolgia's voice would just come from the darkness
          test audiences didn't like it, so the studio told them to add a CGI hell sequence....after they had already run out of budget, and a few months before the film was set to come out, which is why it looks so shit, they had no money or time whatsoever

          the hundreds of "demons" you see in that clip are actually just the production company re-using test footage, it's a clip of someone in the spawn suit doing exaggerated ridiculous movements to test the durability and visuals of the suit, they just took that footage and repeated it hundreds of times, which is why you see the guys doing weird dances and jumping, because it was a guy goofing around in the suit for shits and giggles for footage he never thought would be used

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >the hundreds of "demons" you see in that clip are actually just the production company re-using test footage, it's a clip of someone in the spawn suit doing exaggerated ridiculous movements to test the durability and visuals of the suit, they just took that footage and repeated it hundreds of times, which is why you see the guys doing weird dances and jumping, because it was a guy goofing around in the suit for shits and giggles for footage he never thought would be used
            This is kino.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >it was a guy goofing around in the suit for shits and giggles for footage he never thought would be
            Holy shit lol

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >the hundreds of "demons" you see in that clip are actually just the production company re-using test footage, it's a clip of someone in the spawn suit doing exaggerated ridiculous movements to test the durability and visuals of the suit, they just took that footage and repeated it hundreds of times, which is why you see the guys doing weird dances and jumping, because it was a guy goofing around in the suit for shits and giggles for footage he never thought would be used

            i liked it. very strong mortal kombat vibe

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Al Simmons in a dark room with a light shining on him making him the only thing visible, and Malbolgia's voice would just come from the darkness
            This could easily have been cool if well shot. Although the resulting CG mess is so hilarious I can't fault it for coming into existence.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Would the demons be noticeable on home video? Its been like two decades since I've seen a VHS and box TV

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              you can see them in the fricking webm.

              >It was the era of cutting corners in CG.
              it was worse than that, originally the scene with Malbolgia was just going to be Al Simmons in a dark room with a light shining on him making him the only thing visible, and Malbolgia's voice would just come from the darkness
              test audiences didn't like it, so the studio told them to add a CGI hell sequence....after they had already run out of budget, and a few months before the film was set to come out, which is why it looks so shit, they had no money or time whatsoever

              the hundreds of "demons" you see in that clip are actually just the production company re-using test footage, it's a clip of someone in the spawn suit doing exaggerated ridiculous movements to test the durability and visuals of the suit, they just took that footage and repeated it hundreds of times, which is why you see the guys doing weird dances and jumping, because it was a guy goofing around in the suit for shits and giggles for footage he never thought would be used

              that's gonna be a kino from me chief.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        if only this looked good it'd be a kino scene

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the fact the couldn't even get Satan's mouth to move with his speech was blaringly bad to me even as a lil kid.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like a scene from the Star Wars prequels

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I honestly almost like the aesthetic? Obviously the characters are horrid but I kinda dig the fantasy look, it reminds me of the backgrounds of Bejeweled 3

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's ugly as frick but oddly nostalgic, like PS2 shovelware.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      8 years and those are the character designs they stuck with?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      holy kino

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Val Kilmer
      >Eric Idle

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I wasn't expecting the animation to be so passable, and they got proper VA work. If it wasn't for the eye cancer character designs the only flaws would be low res for the time of release and the bargain bin script.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      actually looks good, too bad the characters are ugly as frick. also Delgo is a stupid name

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >A STORY
      >BEYOND IMAGINATION

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Eternally fricking funny. And the freakouts were even funnier.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The funniest thing about this is that it wasn't even that big of a financial flop, tons of people still went to see it, but Ghostbusters Afterlife is considered a bigger success even though less people saw it, it cost way less money to make. They spent 144 MILLION dollars just filming hours of the actors just goofing around adlibbing lines, then created some shitty CGI effects and called it a day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The prequel to moronic Thor

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Eternally fricking funny. And the freakouts were even funnier.

      Infinitely funnier than the movie itself

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Incidentally, Ghostbusters Afterlife revolved around a young girl as the protagonist

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Because, as we all know, young girls have always been the biggest fans of Ghostbusters.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not my point. She's going off screaming about "MEN being the Ghostbusters again instead of women because they were going ahead with Afterlife instead of a sequel to GB 2016, but then the actual film had a young girl as the protagonist, and a mixed gender "team" of kids.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What a complete lack of self-awareness.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I’ve seen it twice which is more than I’ve seen any other ghostbusters movie. It’s actually not that bad for a Saturday Night Live movie.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the funniest thing about the Ghostbusters reboot was the fact that the entire population of feminists on the internet defended it but they also forgot to buy a ticket to see it in theaters

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >defended it but they also forgot to buy a ticket to see it in theaters

        Two factors:

        1. There isn't much of them. Twitter is like 2% of the population. They're just loud.
        2. They didn't care about the movie, just what it represented. It was explained it was another battle in The Culture War so they have to go to bat. Since they don't care, only a fraction actually went to see it. They just wanted twitter likes and to pat each other on their backs for having the right opinions.

        Also: AVGN is still making videos. Lindsay Ellis had a mental break down because twitter was meant to her once like 2 years ago.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        because they're supposed to teach "the Man" a lesson, feminists don't drink their own medicine

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >It is one of the lowest-grossing animated films of all time and was pulled from theaters after one week of release.[24] According to Yahoo! Movies, this averages approximately two viewers per screening
    just lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Were those all couples looking to frick in an empty theater?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        i was conceived at a screening of delgo

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    buckle up
    >The Conqueror
    >John wayne was at the height of his career and reportedly ran across the script by accident
    >basically anyone with influence over him tried to talk Wayne out of it; knowing that between the film's flowery dialogue, Wayne's general acting ability and the epic scale of the film, something had to give
    >they made it anyway
    >considered a critical failure, spawning parody and pastiche for decades to come
    >the film is infamous for leading to over 90 cancer diagnoses and 40+ deaths
    >it was filmed downwind of nuclear testing in the Mojave
    >John Wayne's shittiest movie also killed him

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The cancer stuff is made up nonsense by liberals scared of nuclear power. The reality is everyone was a massive chain smoker back then but this was before studies were out about how harmful it was so they all died of tar or as I'd like to call it "Black person lung".

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine being this moronic.
        >Bro, just stand there by the nuclear fallout, it will be ok. Dont be a libtard lmao

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Oh frick off pussy. They were filming downwind of nuclear BOMBS not a power plant. Seething dimwit.

          >Anon dies of radiation poisoning to be contrarian

          >he actually thinks smoking tobacco causes lung cancer
          I bet you think dipping causes mouth cancer too you fricking knownothing. Hows about reading some literature on the subject sometime dumbass lmao

          Not that anon but he's right you gays. It's just a homosexual legend, look it up. The cancer rates for the film crew over their entire lives were similar to any other group for their time

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's not a "legend", it was strongly suspected at the time because of how many people involved developed cancer. It's only in hindsight they studied the rates and found it was within range of averages at that time.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oh frick off pussy. They were filming downwind of nuclear BOMBS not a power plant. Seething dimwit.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Imagine of being such a sorry ass b***h that you're afraid of a little strontium-90 poisoning.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Anon dies of radiation poisoning to be contrarian

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >he actually thinks smoking tobacco causes lung cancer
        I bet you think dipping causes mouth cancer too you fricking knownothing. Hows about reading some literature on the subject sometime dumbass lmao

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Smoker cope#
          >phineas j pallmall told me it was okay!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >>the film is infamous for leading to over 90 cancer diagnoses and 40+ deaths
      >>it was filmed downwind of nuclear testing in the Mojave

      The memes are real.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >budget : 65 mil
    >box office : 42 mil worldwide
    it killed the studio behind it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      damn this must've been the last movie my dad took me to see

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >ZOG

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >le short-haired, pink/purple-highlighted asian girl love interest
      Where did this meme start?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Titan A.E.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Unsure but it is incredibly common

          I'm just reminded that Titan A.E. also bombed at the box office and pretty much convinced Don Bluth to retire. It's a shame because the corny soundtrack aside, it's still a good sci fi adventure with some spectacular animation it was a bit of a return to form for Bluth after a lot of duds in the 90s. I think its main problem both in the film and its marketing was it wasn't sure what its audience was, it's quite dark and violent at times making it not super kid friendly, yet a younger audience is more likely to see an animated space adventure, not teens and young adults.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's lewd for an animated film

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              animated films were like that before Pixar

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                If they still were you'd be whining about "Hollywood israelites corrupting our children!"

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Not really no, that's quite lewd for an American animated film of any time.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I'm going to stop you right there. The visuals were fine, as is common in a Bluth film, but the actual writing was utterly fricking terrible.
            Characters changed their motivation on a dime to the point where the surprise villain ends up also being the surprise face-turn. The writers clearly didn't understand plot motivation but wanted to get both the classic Bluth crescendo ending AND his tearjerker moments at the same time.
            As a result, you have something that's little more than poorly fleshed out nonsense.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Unsure but it is incredibly common

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >le short-haired, pink/purple-highlighted asian girl love interest
          Where did this meme start?

          I'm fine with this meme tbh.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It comes from anime where dark blue and purple are used to denote the reflections in jet black hair. These people do not literally have blue/purple hair, rather it's just black asian hair.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            faye isn't asian dumbshit

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The entire cast is standard ambiguous raced sorta asian, but Faye is specifically given Singapore as her origin. That would make her part or fully ethnically chinese since they make up 75% of Singaporeans.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Perhaps, but if I'm not mistaken, didn't Bebop also lean on the aesthetic of Singapore's history as a British colony? Could have had something to do with how they made her character.
                Also, NTG.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              She is from Singapore. We see where her family home once was there in the show.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            wasn't she american?
            I remember she lived in New York iirc

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >wasn't she american?
              >I remember she lived in New York iirc

              Anon. In Bebop world the moon exploded, raining down death upon the world. The earth has largely been abandoned since then. What you remember as "NYC" is a domed city on Mars that just happens to resemble New York in the 90's.

              It should be written into law that CEOs can be publically flogged by their employees with no consequence if they turn out failure ideas.

              They should just remember their skill sets (management) rahter than pretend they're film makers. Just hire people who will hire good writers. Don't pitch your own "genius" ideas. though, admittedly this COULD be a film that works but you need the cutest monster ever and play it for comedy. Fully animated as well. Think Monsters Inc.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >They should just remember their skill sets (management) rahter than pretend they're film makers.
                But that's just it, anon. Until the CEOs face consequences for being moronic, they're going to continue to be moronic. A company failing or losing money doesn't affect them personally.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >the moon exploded
                Hate when that happens. Just pure inconvenience.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >miko morí actress Rinko Kikuchi is 11 years older than her husband
          >her husband’s first name is Shota

          Lmao wtf

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Anon, did you take a phone screenshot of a reaction image and then post it here?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I had to.
              The regular image I saved to my phone was deemed too large for Cinemaphile at 12 fricking mb
              Lord knows why it was so big

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            giwtwm

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It’s because completely black Asian hair is hard to animate or see onscreen, so they add the highlights as sort of a visual reference point.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why are animated flops so common? Could it be kids are fickle, nonsensical creatures and their habits often make no sense?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It’s because studios think kids are moronic and malleable and will watch whatever garbage you put in front of them but the obvious reality is that kids are the most particular and judgemental people of all so they never fall for it. If they tried to make a Marvel movie but for literal children instead of man-children it would make like 1% of budget

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >In June 1966, principal photography was underway with the village scenes being shot in Castle Combe in Wiltshire. The producers did not anticipate that the trained animals for the production would be quarantined upon entering the United Kingdom, forcing replacement of the animals at considerable extra expense to meet deadlines. The producers chose to ignore reports of the area's frequently rainy summers, and the resulting weather continually interfered with shooting and caused health problems for the animals. All modern technologies such as cars, television antennas, and Coca-Cola promotional signs were removed or hidden, which irritated the locals. An artificial dam built by the production unit was controversially destroyed by British Army officer (and future explorer) Ranulph Fiennes because he believed it ruined the village.[Budget woes continued to worsen in which production costs soared to $15 million.

    >In October 1966, scenes were later shot in Marigot Bay, Saint Lucia; this location was equally problematic, and problems with insects and frequent tropical storms delayed filming and left eight crew members bedridden due to vomiting, diarrhea, and high fever. The final scene with a giant snail was complicated not only by the poor design of the large prop, but because the island's children had recently been struck by a gastrointestinal epidemic caused by freshwater snails, and mobs of angry locals threw rocks at it. Around this time, Jacobs was hospitalized after having a heart attack. Within a month, filming had fallen 39 days behind schedule in which the production crew had to decamp back to California for reshoots.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Animal issues
      >Additionally, over 1,200 live animals were used in the film including dogs, pigs, birds, and even giraffes, all of which required understudies. There are anecdotes of a goat who ate Fleischer's script and a parrot that learned to yell "cut." In one instance, ducks for the film were placed on a lake, but had apparently forgotten how to swim and began to sink, and crew members had to jump into the water to save them. Animals also bit and defecated on the cast and crew, including Harrison.

      >Location issues
      >Because of the troublesome location shoots, the production sets were later reconstructed on the Fox studio lot in California. By then, the production budget had reached $17 million. Four months later, when filming had finished, Harrison insisted on re-recording his songs live on set. This infuriated conductor Lionel Newman, but he gave into Harrison's demands which proved to be tedious as the orchestral arrangements had to be added later. Filming was finished by April 1967

      And the kicker

      >The film faced strong competition from Disney's animated feature film The Jungle Book, which had opened to considerable critical and audience acclaim two months earlier and was still in wide release. Doctor Dolittle's appeal as family fare was undermined when the press drew attention to racist content in the books, prompting demands to have them removed from public schools.

      >According to studio records, the film needed to earn $31,275,000 in rentals to break even, and by December 1970, the film had made $16.3 million. In September 1970, the studio estimated it had lost $11,141,000 on the movie.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >a parrot that learned to tell “cut”

        I’m fricking crying

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >and a parrot that learned to yell "cut."

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >There are anecdotes of a goat who ate Fleischer's script
        No idea why I thought of this but I did

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Doctor Dolittle's appeal as family fare was undermined when the press drew attention to racist content in the books, prompting demands to have them removed from public schools.
        Hang on, I thought cancel culture was invented in 2016?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >In one instance, ducks for the film were placed on a lake, but had apparently forgotten how to swim and began to sink, and crew members had to jump into the water to save them.
        ducks don't float?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They weren't witches.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Fricking lost.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        , over 1,200 live animals were used in the film including dogs, pigs, birds, and even giraffes, all of which required understudies

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >ducks for the film were placed on a lake, but had apparently forgotten how to swim and began to sink, and crew members had to jump into the water to save them.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >a parrot that learned to yell "cut."
        Chad

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Funny but honestly kind of sad

      >Animal issues
      >Additionally, over 1,200 live animals were used in the film including dogs, pigs, birds, and even giraffes, all of which required understudies. There are anecdotes of a goat who ate Fleischer's script and a parrot that learned to yell "cut." In one instance, ducks for the film were placed on a lake, but had apparently forgotten how to swim and began to sink, and crew members had to jump into the water to save them. Animals also bit and defecated on the cast and crew, including Harrison.

      >Location issues
      >Because of the troublesome location shoots, the production sets were later reconstructed on the Fox studio lot in California. By then, the production budget had reached $17 million. Four months later, when filming had finished, Harrison insisted on re-recording his songs live on set. This infuriated conductor Lionel Newman, but he gave into Harrison's demands which proved to be tedious as the orchestral arrangements had to be added later. Filming was finished by April 1967

      And the kicker

      >The film faced strong competition from Disney's animated feature film The Jungle Book, which had opened to considerable critical and audience acclaim two months earlier and was still in wide release. Doctor Dolittle's appeal as family fare was undermined when the press drew attention to racist content in the books, prompting demands to have them removed from public schools.

      >According to studio records, the film needed to earn $31,275,000 in rentals to break even, and by December 1970, the film had made $16.3 million. In September 1970, the studio estimated it had lost $11,141,000 on the movie.

      Now this is hilarious. They should make a movie about making this film

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The final scene with a giant snail
      >the island's children had recently been struck by a gastrointestinal epidemic caused by freshwater snails
      >mobs of angry locals threw rocks at it.

      I didn't know where the island of St. Lucia was, but as soon as I read this, I knew that it was inhabited by blacks.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Animal issues
      >Additionally, over 1,200 live animals were used in the film including dogs, pigs, birds, and even giraffes, all of which required understudies. There are anecdotes of a goat who ate Fleischer's script and a parrot that learned to yell "cut." In one instance, ducks for the film were placed on a lake, but had apparently forgotten how to swim and began to sink, and crew members had to jump into the water to save them. Animals also bit and defecated on the cast and crew, including Harrison.

      >Location issues
      >Because of the troublesome location shoots, the production sets were later reconstructed on the Fox studio lot in California. By then, the production budget had reached $17 million. Four months later, when filming had finished, Harrison insisted on re-recording his songs live on set. This infuriated conductor Lionel Newman, but he gave into Harrison's demands which proved to be tedious as the orchestral arrangements had to be added later. Filming was finished by April 1967

      And the kicker

      >The film faced strong competition from Disney's animated feature film The Jungle Book, which had opened to considerable critical and audience acclaim two months earlier and was still in wide release. Doctor Dolittle's appeal as family fare was undermined when the press drew attention to racist content in the books, prompting demands to have them removed from public schools.

      >According to studio records, the film needed to earn $31,275,000 in rentals to break even, and by December 1970, the film had made $16.3 million. In September 1970, the studio estimated it had lost $11,141,000 on the movie.

      How very fitting that the latest adaptation of Dr. Dolittle also ran into loads of filming and post-production problems with delays and eventually a big flop. Probably not as hilarious though.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I love how some people speculated that RDJ must have been blackmailed into doing this movie.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I love how some people speculated that RDJ must have been blackmailed into doing this movie.

        On the contrary he was one of the ones pushing it

        >Principal production commenced mid-February 2018. Live-action scenes began filming in Kirkby Lonsdale, Cumbria in May 2018, with further location filming at South Forest, Windsor Great Park, at Cothay Manor in Stawley, Somerset and on the Menai Suspension Bridge in North West Wales, in June 2018.

        >In April 2019, it was reported the film had undergone 21 days of re-shoots following poor test screenings. Director Jonathan Liebesman helped to oversee the filming alongside Gaghan, while Chris McKay wrote new material after it became clear from first cuts that the comedy elements of the film were not coming together as well as the producers had hoped. Prior to this, Universal had turned towards Seth Rogen and Neighbors co-writer Brendan O'Brien to help add comedy to the film. However, neither could remain committed to the project and dropped out. McKay was assigned to storyboard sequences and assemble different edits before later leaving to instead direct The Tomorrow War. Liebesman took over McKay's duties and finished the film alongside Gaghan. The Lego Batman Movie scribe John Whittington had also performed rewrites on the script amid reshoots, and flew to London to meet with Downey, who allegedly tore Whittington's script apart in favor of "new ideas." The Hollywood Reporter stated that despite a "challenged production," there were no fights for power and no competing cuts for the film. In August 2019, it was reported that the film's title had been changed from The Voyage of Doctor Dolittle to simply Dolittle.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I thought I heard somewhere that RDJ insisted on THAT dragon scene...

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Remake a flop
        >It flops again

        Pottery.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        another theory was that it was an elaborate scheme for RDJ to embezzle a hefty paycheck, I don't remember the details, but allegedly it was a deliberate flop for $$$, somehow.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Budget: $40 million
    textbook example of money-laundering

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think you know what this term means. That 40 million mostly came from one guy, the helmer, it was his passion project and he was wealthy from other businesses.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Kek, so textbook embezzling then? They let a fool with more money than sense give them 40 m's for this shitshow.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          No, not every big loss is some scheme. People lose money on dumb decisions all the time. Look at that billionaire blowing 100+ million on that Empires of the Deep film above out of vanity

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Someone post the Delgo x Sing room.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      wut

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Here's maybe the top example of studios just grabbing up film rights to whatever fantasy series they could find out there and throwing something out in an attempt to get those sweet sweet Potter dollars. You're probably not familiar with this five book series by Susan Cooper, The Dark Is Rising Sequence, because well, they were published from 1965 to 1977. Not too many books remain super well known decades later, only a select few. In any case, they're the usual young Brit fantasy type books. So what did they do with the rights to this pretty old series?

    >The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising is very loosely based on the second book in Susan Cooper's series The Dark Is Rising Sequence. Walden Media hired screenwriter John Hodge in October 2005 to adapt the story for the big screen. The mythology of Cooper's book was considered to be the plot, and Hodge was tasked to interpret the book into events that could be portrayed in a film. The story, which took place in the 1960s and 1970s in the book, was rewritten to be contemporary. Hodge rewrote the protagonist Will Stanton, portrayed by Alexander Ludwig, to be 14 instead of 11. Stanton was also written to be American so he would be established as more of an outsider, culturally alien to the story's English setting. Hodge also wrote new subplots for Ludwig's character in the film, including sibling conflicts, a crush on a young woman (Amelia Warner), and alienation at school. The script also features the inclusion of many action sequences. The character of The Walker, portrayed by Jonathan Jackson, was also rewritten as a younger person with a new story arc about the loss of his soul. However, Jackson's character was ultimately removed from the film's theatrical cut. Susan Cooper was reportedly not happy with the adaptation of her book.
    And how it turned out

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The Seeker was released in the United States and Canada on October 5, 2007. The film grossed $3,745,315 in 3,141 theaters in its opening weekend, ranking No. 5 at the box office in the United States and Canada. The Seeker had one of the poorest starts for a fantasy film. Box Office Prophets questioned why the film was opened in so many venues, with the cost for prints in 3,141 theaters exceeding its opening weekend gross. The Seeker has grossed $8.8 million, in the United States and Canada and $22.6 million in other territories for a worldwide total of $31.4 million. The Seeker had the second worst debut of all time for a film released in more than 3,000 theaters, placing behind Walden's 2006 comedy-adventure film Hoot. The Seeker then lost the most theaters in its third weekend, ahead of Hoot.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Here's maybe the top example of studios just grabbing up film rights to whatever fantasy series they could find out there and throwing something out in an attempt to get those sweet sweet Potter dollars. You're probably not familiar with this five book series by Susan Cooper, The Dark Is Rising Sequence, because well, they were published from 1965 to 1977. Not too many books remain super well known decades later, only a select few. In any case, they're the usual young Brit fantasy type books. So what did they do with the rights to this pretty old series?

        >The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising is very loosely based on the second book in Susan Cooper's series The Dark Is Rising Sequence. Walden Media hired screenwriter John Hodge in October 2005 to adapt the story for the big screen. The mythology of Cooper's book was considered to be the plot, and Hodge was tasked to interpret the book into events that could be portrayed in a film. The story, which took place in the 1960s and 1970s in the book, was rewritten to be contemporary. Hodge rewrote the protagonist Will Stanton, portrayed by Alexander Ludwig, to be 14 instead of 11. Stanton was also written to be American so he would be established as more of an outsider, culturally alien to the story's English setting. Hodge also wrote new subplots for Ludwig's character in the film, including sibling conflicts, a crush on a young woman (Amelia Warner), and alienation at school. The script also features the inclusion of many action sequences. The character of The Walker, portrayed by Jonathan Jackson, was also rewritten as a younger person with a new story arc about the loss of his soul. However, Jackson's character was ultimately removed from the film's theatrical cut. Susan Cooper was reportedly not happy with the adaptation of her book.
        And how it turned out

        The really dumb part of all this, is that they were chasing Harry Potter money, and Harry Potter did NONE of that. It didn't alter characters ages, change the setting, add shit, it adapted the plots faithfully. Maybe not flawlessly, but they are still pretty close adaptations.

        Somehow the lesson that studio took was "age everyone up, add action and teen drama, and make the protagonist American"

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >it adapted the plots faithfully. Maybe not flawlessly
          It's my belief that no sane human should get mad at movie studios for cutting for time. The bullshit that some pull like this one did where it changes things that's another story

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            My talk of flawlessly isn't really about cutting for time more than I think they often mangled major plot points and certain character alterations annoyed me (the screenwriter was openly a Hermione fanboy for instance and shifted many scenes of Ron to focus on her instead). In any case, they remain pretty faithful as far as following the books they adapt, more so than other very acclaimed adaptations like LOTR which took plenty of liberties and not just in what they cut.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              sorry anon i figured you might take it as me saying you were since I quoted you but it sparked me thinking of it so felt need to quote you so you understood why i was veering the conversation

              to further the conversation the best example i have in regards to harry potter have not read the books except for number 4, so the whole bathroom scene that truly added nothing in the book other than a clue was cut down in the movie if even shown it might have been a movie extra even.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              yes lotr after literally finishing the audiobooks today. peter jacksons galaderial scene was too sinister and frodo going back an attacking golem ruins the climax

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                the Galadriel scene from the movie is more like what Galadriel herself was thinking and feeling internally in the book when she was tempted with the ring. but ideally something more in the middle would be perfect

                one of the things its hard for people to grasp from the book and movie is just how powerful and corrupting the ring really is. people constly even make memes about it and even forget that in the end frodo was corrupted by it and sauron proved right in that no one could resist it

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >sauron proved right in that no one could resist it
                Tom Bombadil would like a word with you

                captcha: tos hr

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >God can resist the Devil
                Bravo, anon. Truly the big brain guy.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, but think about the difference in personalities between passionate artists who want to create a unique artistic vision, versus businessmen who see what somebody else had success with and want to rip it off.

          Like, OF COURSE they're going to miss the point entirely and create laughably bad schlock that has their "personal touches" riddled throughout.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Hodge rewrote the protagonist Will Stanton, portrayed by Alexander Ludwig, to be 14 instead of 11. Stanton was also written to be American so he would be established as more of an outsider, culturally alien to the story's English setting. Hodge also wrote new subplots for Ludwig's character in the film, including sibling conflicts, a crush on a young woman (Amelia Warner), and alienation at school. The script also features the inclusion of many action sequences.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I loved this series in elementary school tbqh

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Perhaps you should watch the movie and see what you think.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So let's buy a thing no one even remembers, then change it into something even the outliers who know what the frick it is wont recognize? Holy frick Hollywood execs are moronic.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Oof, just like Kingdoms of Amalur

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The weird thing is, I've seen the movie. It's pretty fricking bad, but not unenjoyably terrible. I've seen far worse movies than Delgo.
      Hell, it's worth the price of admission just so you can see Eric Idle be a Kobold who tries to sound smart by using big words he doesn't know the definitions of.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Flowery language to basically say "he used unpaid/underpaid interns"

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ahh the 90s

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      why has hollywood spent decades trying to convince me that hag is attractive?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        because she's le wholesome and fun to work with, not like literally hitler Sharon Stone. For how hard they supposedly work, hollywood is incredibly pathetic and weak.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        How dare you speak that way about Ralph.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >main character has a comb-over
    yea i wouldn't have gone to see it either

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'll grant you that this is less funny than frustrating, but not thread about failures in film would be complete without somebody mentioning Heaven's Gate.

    It's actually kino.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know, it's kind of funny.
      >As an example of Cimino's fanatical attention to detail, a street built to his precise specifications had to be torn down and rebuilt because it reportedly "didn't look right." The street in question needed to be six feet wider; the set construction boss said it would be cheaper to tear down one side and move it back six feet, but Cimino insisted that both sides be dismantled and moved back three feet, then reassembled.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the set construction boss said it would be cheaper to tear down one side and move it back six feet, but Cimino insisted that both sides be dismantled and moved back three feet, then reassembled.
        Why....

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This is the same guy who delayed filming one day, perpetually, until....a cloud he was satisfied with floated into the shot.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It was actually good, but I also could understand why it flopped so hard, too. Especially for the time, I'm surprised a four-hour slow burn Western with no real stars in it was even greenlit.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well what actually ended up released wide was a sliced down re-edit, only 149 minutes long. The four hour one didn't even get past a week before they pulled it and did the hatchet job.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        UA took the risk because they hoped it will be another Godfather. A troubled production that turns out to be brilliant. Cimino is at fault and UA for not doing enough to keep him in check.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Reminds me of the movie battle for terra, some aweful avatar rip off where you are meant to support the aliens but everything the movie does makes you support the humand taking the planet.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >you are meant to support the aliens but everything the movie does makes you support the humand taking the planet.
      Just like Avatar.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I once got like ten guys together to watch a film (something big) but got the day wrong so we all had to watch fricking Skyline atthe cinema.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      rick?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Dan.
        Nice to know I'm not the only moron

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > Empires Of The Deep was a Vanity Project for Chinese real estate mogul Jon Jiang, who was inspired to make it after seeing the visual effects of Avatar. An Epic Movie with a Greek mythology-inspired plot and a $130-150 million budget paid for mostly out of Jiang's pocket, with plans for a multimedia franchise encompassing a trilogy, an animated series, video games, action figures, and an amusement park, it has never been released despite being all but finished.
    > Steve Polites and Maxx Maulion were unknown actors cast simply because they were Americans, which Jiang hoped would lend a degree of Hollywood prestige to the project. Problems began immediately when it became apparent to Polites and Maulion that very few people involved with the film spoke a word of English, and that the film's main purpose was to promote Jiang's real estate ventures. Polites realized it the moment he stepped off the plane with a bad case of 'hat head' rather than the curly brown hair he had in his audition, causing his stylists to panic and give him an awful dye job because he couldn't communicate with them. Maulion, meanwhile, realized it when the film's cast was brought out to headline the grand opening of one of Jiang's hotels. The casting of other actors was about as rigorous; Irons blatantly lied about his past films and about his experience with action and fight scenes, thankful that IMDb was blocked in China, while Jiang cast his girlfriend Shi Yanfei as the female lead.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Jiang's mismanagement of production was comparable to that of Tommy Wiseau. Hairstyles changed frequently, extras were used to play multiple background characters, Jiang insisted on wrinkly swimcaps for the actors playing mermen instead of proper makeup, actors were put into makeup "just in case" even on days when they weren't set to film, and when, during shooting on a beach with a very non-ancient hotel resort in clear view, director Jonathan Lawrence jokingly suggested building a wall to block the view of the resort and keep it out of the shot, Jiang took him seriously and actually built that wall — defeating the purpose of shooting on location instead of on a soundstage (because now they'd need to use CGI to cover up the wall).
      >Lawrence was actually the second director hired for the film, which ultimately went through four of them. The first director hired for the project, Pitof, was best known in the West as the director of the infamous bomb Catwoman (2004). Pitof thought that the screenplay (which Jiang wrote himself) was so terrible that, upon reading it, he immediately hired Michael Ryan to do major rewrites, producing a screenplay that was more reminiscent of Clash of the Titans (2010). Jiang, unfortunately, hated Ryan's script, and after multiple fights over it, Pitof eventually quit before production began. Lawrence, who Jiang had initially passed over, was hired next, and held the same opinion of Jiang's script; he ultimately left the film due to both problems receiving his pay and concerns over conditions on set. Canadian director Michael French was next in the director's chair; due to a preexisting work commitment, he could only shoot for three months, and he decided to shoot the film as a comedy, owing to both his background in the genre and (again) the fact that he thought the script was incredibly campy. Scott Miller, the son of sports documentarian Warren Miller, was the one who finally finished it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Lawrence wasn't the only one whose paychecks came late or not at all. Foreign extras who grumbled about not getting paid were met with visits from the police to check their visas, while Maulion ultimately quit the film over $30,000 he was owed that failed to materialize.
        >No OSHA Compliance was in full effect on set. Scenes were shot in caves with random falling rocks, in remote locations where access to a rescue helicopter could not be guaranteed if anything went wrong, and (for underwater scenes) in a diving tank with lights hanging just a few inches above the water that was kept clean simply by dumping more chlorine into it. Actors and crew worked in very non-union conditions; work days ran up to 22 hours straight at points, with no heaters, no water, and few breaks for food and rest. For the mermen, the glue used to hold their prosthetics to their bodies wound up being toxic and irritating their skin. When actress Irena Violette quit the production out of fear for her safety, not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
        >The few people who have seen the finished film have described it as one of the most unintentionally hilarious things they'd ever witnessed, such that it could become a Cult Classic on the "bad movie" circuit if it were ever released. Jiang, for his part, still insists that Empires of the Deep will see the light of day.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Any movie involving large amounts of water is cursed... So about that avatar 2 trailer...

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Any movie involving large amounts of water is cursed
            How the frick did he do it bros?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
          what a fricking shitshow

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Foreign extras who grumbled about not getting paid were met with visits from the police to check their visas

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >actors were put into makeup "just in case" even on days when they weren't set to film
        for some reason that's the detail that got me

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Jiang's mismanagement of production was comparable to that of Tommy Wiseau. Hairstyles changed frequently, extras were used to play multiple background characters, Jiang insisted on wrinkly swimcaps for the actors playing mermen instead of proper makeup, actors were put into makeup "just in case" even on days when they weren't set to film, and when, during shooting on a beach with a very non-ancient hotel resort in clear view, director Jonathan Lawrence jokingly suggested building a wall to block the view of the resort and keep it out of the shot, Jiang took him seriously and actually built that wall — defeating the purpose of shooting on location instead of on a soundstage (because now they'd need to use CGI to cover up the wall).
      >Lawrence was actually the second director hired for the film, which ultimately went through four of them. The first director hired for the project, Pitof, was best known in the West as the director of the infamous bomb Catwoman (2004). Pitof thought that the screenplay (which Jiang wrote himself) was so terrible that, upon reading it, he immediately hired Michael Ryan to do major rewrites, producing a screenplay that was more reminiscent of Clash of the Titans (2010). Jiang, unfortunately, hated Ryan's script, and after multiple fights over it, Pitof eventually quit before production began. Lawrence, who Jiang had initially passed over, was hired next, and held the same opinion of Jiang's script; he ultimately left the film due to both problems receiving his pay and concerns over conditions on set. Canadian director Michael French was next in the director's chair; due to a preexisting work commitment, he could only shoot for three months, and he decided to shoot the film as a comedy, owing to both his background in the genre and (again) the fact that he thought the script was incredibly campy. Scott Miller, the son of sports documentarian Warren Miller, was the one who finally finished it.

      >Lawrence wasn't the only one whose paychecks came late or not at all. Foreign extras who grumbled about not getting paid were met with visits from the police to check their visas, while Maulion ultimately quit the film over $30,000 he was owed that failed to materialize.
      >No OSHA Compliance was in full effect on set. Scenes were shot in caves with random falling rocks, in remote locations where access to a rescue helicopter could not be guaranteed if anything went wrong, and (for underwater scenes) in a diving tank with lights hanging just a few inches above the water that was kept clean simply by dumping more chlorine into it. Actors and crew worked in very non-union conditions; work days ran up to 22 hours straight at points, with no heaters, no water, and few breaks for food and rest. For the mermen, the glue used to hold their prosthetics to their bodies wound up being toxic and irritating their skin. When actress Irena Violette quit the production out of fear for her safety, not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
      >The few people who have seen the finished film have described it as one of the most unintentionally hilarious things they'd ever witnessed, such that it could become a Cult Classic on the "bad movie" circuit if it were ever released. Jiang, for his part, still insists that Empires of the Deep will see the light of day.

      do it Jiang release the cut

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Jiang's mismanagement of production was comparable to that of Tommy Wiseau. Hairstyles changed frequently, extras were used to play multiple background characters, Jiang insisted on wrinkly swimcaps for the actors playing mermen instead of proper makeup, actors were put into makeup "just in case" even on days when they weren't set to film, and when, during shooting on a beach with a very non-ancient hotel resort in clear view, director Jonathan Lawrence jokingly suggested building a wall to block the view of the resort and keep it out of the shot, Jiang took him seriously and actually built that wall — defeating the purpose of shooting on location instead of on a soundstage (because now they'd need to use CGI to cover up the wall).
      >Lawrence was actually the second director hired for the film, which ultimately went through four of them. The first director hired for the project, Pitof, was best known in the West as the director of the infamous bomb Catwoman (2004). Pitof thought that the screenplay (which Jiang wrote himself) was so terrible that, upon reading it, he immediately hired Michael Ryan to do major rewrites, producing a screenplay that was more reminiscent of Clash of the Titans (2010). Jiang, unfortunately, hated Ryan's script, and after multiple fights over it, Pitof eventually quit before production began. Lawrence, who Jiang had initially passed over, was hired next, and held the same opinion of Jiang's script; he ultimately left the film due to both problems receiving his pay and concerns over conditions on set. Canadian director Michael French was next in the director's chair; due to a preexisting work commitment, he could only shoot for three months, and he decided to shoot the film as a comedy, owing to both his background in the genre and (again) the fact that he thought the script was incredibly campy. Scott Miller, the son of sports documentarian Warren Miller, was the one who finally finished it.

      >Lawrence wasn't the only one whose paychecks came late or not at all. Foreign extras who grumbled about not getting paid were met with visits from the police to check their visas, while Maulion ultimately quit the film over $30,000 he was owed that failed to materialize.
      >No OSHA Compliance was in full effect on set. Scenes were shot in caves with random falling rocks, in remote locations where access to a rescue helicopter could not be guaranteed if anything went wrong, and (for underwater scenes) in a diving tank with lights hanging just a few inches above the water that was kept clean simply by dumping more chlorine into it. Actors and crew worked in very non-union conditions; work days ran up to 22 hours straight at points, with no heaters, no water, and few breaks for food and rest. For the mermen, the glue used to hold their prosthetics to their bodies wound up being toxic and irritating their skin. When actress Irena Violette quit the production out of fear for her safety, not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
      >The few people who have seen the finished film have described it as one of the most unintentionally hilarious things they'd ever witnessed, such that it could become a Cult Classic on the "bad movie" circuit if it were ever released. Jiang, for his part, still insists that Empires of the Deep will see the light of day.

      Ah now this is the kind of juicy nonsense I came in this thread for. I MUST see this movie, somehow.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The frick

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >no mention of Olga
      How did she wind up in this mess?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        kinolenko

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I love her so much bro

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Jiang's mismanagement of production was comparable to that of Tommy Wiseau. Hairstyles changed frequently, extras were used to play multiple background characters, Jiang insisted on wrinkly swimcaps for the actors playing mermen instead of proper makeup, actors were put into makeup "just in case" even on days when they weren't set to film, and when, during shooting on a beach with a very non-ancient hotel resort in clear view, director Jonathan Lawrence jokingly suggested building a wall to block the view of the resort and keep it out of the shot, Jiang took him seriously and actually built that wall — defeating the purpose of shooting on location instead of on a soundstage (because now they'd need to use CGI to cover up the wall).
      >Lawrence was actually the second director hired for the film, which ultimately went through four of them. The first director hired for the project, Pitof, was best known in the West as the director of the infamous bomb Catwoman (2004). Pitof thought that the screenplay (which Jiang wrote himself) was so terrible that, upon reading it, he immediately hired Michael Ryan to do major rewrites, producing a screenplay that was more reminiscent of Clash of the Titans (2010). Jiang, unfortunately, hated Ryan's script, and after multiple fights over it, Pitof eventually quit before production began. Lawrence, who Jiang had initially passed over, was hired next, and held the same opinion of Jiang's script; he ultimately left the film due to both problems receiving his pay and concerns over conditions on set. Canadian director Michael French was next in the director's chair; due to a preexisting work commitment, he could only shoot for three months, and he decided to shoot the film as a comedy, owing to both his background in the genre and (again) the fact that he thought the script was incredibly campy. Scott Miller, the son of sports documentarian Warren Miller, was the one who finally finished it.

      >Lawrence wasn't the only one whose paychecks came late or not at all. Foreign extras who grumbled about not getting paid were met with visits from the police to check their visas, while Maulion ultimately quit the film over $30,000 he was owed that failed to materialize.
      >No OSHA Compliance was in full effect on set. Scenes were shot in caves with random falling rocks, in remote locations where access to a rescue helicopter could not be guaranteed if anything went wrong, and (for underwater scenes) in a diving tank with lights hanging just a few inches above the water that was kept clean simply by dumping more chlorine into it. Actors and crew worked in very non-union conditions; work days ran up to 22 hours straight at points, with no heaters, no water, and few breaks for food and rest. For the mermen, the glue used to hold their prosthetics to their bodies wound up being toxic and irritating their skin. When actress Irena Violette quit the production out of fear for her safety, not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
      >The few people who have seen the finished film have described it as one of the most unintentionally hilarious things they'd ever witnessed, such that it could become a Cult Classic on the "bad movie" circuit if it were ever released. Jiang, for his part, still insists that Empires of the Deep will see the light of day.

      >Jon Jiang had also described to Jonathan Lawrence his vision for the film as "Transformers meets Shakespeare"; in response Lawrence replied that the film would likely "alienate one of those audiences"

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Jiang's mismanagement of production was comparable to that of Tommy Wiseau. Hairstyles changed frequently, extras were used to play multiple background characters, Jiang insisted on wrinkly swimcaps for the actors playing mermen instead of proper makeup, actors were put into makeup "just in case" even on days when they weren't set to film, and when, during shooting on a beach with a very non-ancient hotel resort in clear view, director Jonathan Lawrence jokingly suggested building a wall to block the view of the resort and keep it out of the shot, Jiang took him seriously and actually built that wall — defeating the purpose of shooting on location instead of on a soundstage (because now they'd need to use CGI to cover up the wall).
      >Lawrence was actually the second director hired for the film, which ultimately went through four of them. The first director hired for the project, Pitof, was best known in the West as the director of the infamous bomb Catwoman (2004). Pitof thought that the screenplay (which Jiang wrote himself) was so terrible that, upon reading it, he immediately hired Michael Ryan to do major rewrites, producing a screenplay that was more reminiscent of Clash of the Titans (2010). Jiang, unfortunately, hated Ryan's script, and after multiple fights over it, Pitof eventually quit before production began. Lawrence, who Jiang had initially passed over, was hired next, and held the same opinion of Jiang's script; he ultimately left the film due to both problems receiving his pay and concerns over conditions on set. Canadian director Michael French was next in the director's chair; due to a preexisting work commitment, he could only shoot for three months, and he decided to shoot the film as a comedy, owing to both his background in the genre and (again) the fact that he thought the script was incredibly campy. Scott Miller, the son of sports documentarian Warren Miller, was the one who finally finished it.

      >Lawrence wasn't the only one whose paychecks came late or not at all. Foreign extras who grumbled about not getting paid were met with visits from the police to check their visas, while Maulion ultimately quit the film over $30,000 he was owed that failed to materialize.
      >No OSHA Compliance was in full effect on set. Scenes were shot in caves with random falling rocks, in remote locations where access to a rescue helicopter could not be guaranteed if anything went wrong, and (for underwater scenes) in a diving tank with lights hanging just a few inches above the water that was kept clean simply by dumping more chlorine into it. Actors and crew worked in very non-union conditions; work days ran up to 22 hours straight at points, with no heaters, no water, and few breaks for food and rest. For the mermen, the glue used to hold their prosthetics to their bodies wound up being toxic and irritating their skin. When actress Irena Violette quit the production out of fear for her safety, not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
      >The few people who have seen the finished film have described it as one of the most unintentionally hilarious things they'd ever witnessed, such that it could become a Cult Classic on the "bad movie" circuit if it were ever released. Jiang, for his part, still insists that Empires of the Deep will see the light of day.

      Oh lord there's a trailer

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Avatar 2 looks like THAT?!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        rooks fine, what problem

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Olga K
        Jesus Christ. I wonder what wrapped principal photography first. This or Oblivion.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          In her defense, she was paid a million dollars for the film and seems like she isn't really in it that much, she only shot for a couple of months and that was it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what's best about this is the CGI is decent quality in terms of textures etc. but garbage in terms of animation so it looks like 60s stop-motion, and so performs the very difficult act of being so cringe it wraps around to being based again

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Holy hell his hair looks like a burnt wig

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It does indeed. Unfortunately for him...it is burnt, but it's not a wig.

          >In November 2009, Lawrence greeted Steve Polites and Maxx Maulion at the Beijing airport. Lawrence warned them that the movie wouldn’t be like anything they’d ever experienced before. “Nothing is like it is in America,” he told them. “Everything changes here from moment to moment. What is true today will not be true tomorrow.”

          >The actors drove straight to the Fontelysee offices. To prepare to play Atlas, the hero and the son of Poseidon, Polites had grown out his hair to match the concept art he’d been shown. But at the office, the hair stylists were alarmed by the state of Atlas’s mane. Polites tried to explain that he had hat head, but the term was lost in translation. “This is not how my hair looks normally,” he said. “Let me wash my hair.”

          >The women spoke in rapid-fire Chinese. They pulled out a wig that looked like “a knock-off Lord of the Rings hobbit wig,” Polites recalls. He was then escorted across the street to a hair salon where stylists permed his hair and bleached it.

          >Over the course of the next week, his hair changed from orange to green to black and finally to blond, styled in tight curls. He pleaded with Lawrence to step in, but it was too late. Polites looked like he’d had a bowl of instant noodles dropped over his head.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Everything changes here from moment to moment. What is true today will not be true tomorrow
            That sounds like hell on its own.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Christ

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            poor bastard
            probably had to just shave his head after filming

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If you enjoyed hearing about the nonsense of Empires of the Deep, here's a lengthy article detailing the entire production, someone did a pretty thorough deep dive into the whole thing.

        https://magazine.atavist.com/sunk

        [...]
        >Two days later, no ticket had arrived. Liang told her that the production would not pay for her ticket and demanded that she repay all of the salary she’d earned so far.
        >Violette and Berg’s passports were at the production office, so Violette called an American consulate for help. The official on the phone advised them to make their way to the nearest U.S. consulate, either in Guangzhou or Shanghai.
        >The couple met with Lawrence to plan an escape. They decided that in the evening Lawrence would call an all-hands production meeting in the hotel lobby. While the crew was distracted, Violette and Berg would slip out a window.

        >That night, with the entire production gathered around the director, the couple scurried down a hallway unnoticed. They dumped their luggage out the window and crawled after it. Then they walked down to a riverbank beyond the hotel grounds and hiked along the river until they found a spot narrow enough to cross. They waded through the water, carrying their luggage above their heads, and then climbed up the steep embankment on the other side.
        >The next morning, the couple reached a police station in a town called Fuding. The police gave them travel papers and drove them to a train station, where they caught the 11 a.m. to Shanghai.
        >That night they checked into the Ritz-Carlton in Shanghai. The American consulate provided them with temporary passports and obtained Chinese exit visas. A few days later, they were on a plane to Los Angeles.

        >At the mountaintop hotel, Lawrence kept up a ruse that the couple were refusing to come out of their room. During mealtimes, he would take a tray of food into their room and dump it out the window.
        >Eventually, the crew demanded that Violette return to the movie. Lawrence knocked on the door one last time.
        >“Hey guys, it’s me,” he said. He went into the room and emerged moments later to face the Chinese crew with the truth. “They’re gone.”

        kek, what the actual shit?

        Holy hell I need to watch this film, please Jiang do it!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Holy frick.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        looks fricking KINO. I hate film people honestly, just release the damn thing.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Their movie has been on the shelf so long they got looped by Aquaman

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Jiang's mismanagement of production was comparable to that of Tommy Wiseau. Hairstyles changed frequently, extras were used to play multiple background characters, Jiang insisted on wrinkly swimcaps for the actors playing mermen instead of proper makeup, actors were put into makeup "just in case" even on days when they weren't set to film, and when, during shooting on a beach with a very non-ancient hotel resort in clear view, director Jonathan Lawrence jokingly suggested building a wall to block the view of the resort and keep it out of the shot, Jiang took him seriously and actually built that wall — defeating the purpose of shooting on location instead of on a soundstage (because now they'd need to use CGI to cover up the wall).
      >Lawrence was actually the second director hired for the film, which ultimately went through four of them. The first director hired for the project, Pitof, was best known in the West as the director of the infamous bomb Catwoman (2004). Pitof thought that the screenplay (which Jiang wrote himself) was so terrible that, upon reading it, he immediately hired Michael Ryan to do major rewrites, producing a screenplay that was more reminiscent of Clash of the Titans (2010). Jiang, unfortunately, hated Ryan's script, and after multiple fights over it, Pitof eventually quit before production began. Lawrence, who Jiang had initially passed over, was hired next, and held the same opinion of Jiang's script; he ultimately left the film due to both problems receiving his pay and concerns over conditions on set. Canadian director Michael French was next in the director's chair; due to a preexisting work commitment, he could only shoot for three months, and he decided to shoot the film as a comedy, owing to both his background in the genre and (again) the fact that he thought the script was incredibly campy. Scott Miller, the son of sports documentarian Warren Miller, was the one who finally finished it.

      >Lawrence wasn't the only one whose paychecks came late or not at all. Foreign extras who grumbled about not getting paid were met with visits from the police to check their visas, while Maulion ultimately quit the film over $30,000 he was owed that failed to materialize.
      >No OSHA Compliance was in full effect on set. Scenes were shot in caves with random falling rocks, in remote locations where access to a rescue helicopter could not be guaranteed if anything went wrong, and (for underwater scenes) in a diving tank with lights hanging just a few inches above the water that was kept clean simply by dumping more chlorine into it. Actors and crew worked in very non-union conditions; work days ran up to 22 hours straight at points, with no heaters, no water, and few breaks for food and rest. For the mermen, the glue used to hold their prosthetics to their bodies wound up being toxic and irritating their skin. When actress Irena Violette quit the production out of fear for her safety, not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
      >The few people who have seen the finished film have described it as one of the most unintentionally hilarious things they'd ever witnessed, such that it could become a Cult Classic on the "bad movie" circuit if it were ever released. Jiang, for his part, still insists that Empires of the Deep will see the light of day.

      How hard would this have flopped, had it been released?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Aggressively, even vehemently.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Jiang's mismanagement of production was comparable to that of Tommy Wiseau. Hairstyles changed frequently, extras were used to play multiple background characters, Jiang insisted on wrinkly swimcaps for the actors playing mermen instead of proper makeup, actors were put into makeup "just in case" even on days when they weren't set to film, and when, during shooting on a beach with a very non-ancient hotel resort in clear view, director Jonathan Lawrence jokingly suggested building a wall to block the view of the resort and keep it out of the shot, Jiang took him seriously and actually built that wall — defeating the purpose of shooting on location instead of on a soundstage (because now they'd need to use CGI to cover up the wall).
      >Lawrence was actually the second director hired for the film, which ultimately went through four of them. The first director hired for the project, Pitof, was best known in the West as the director of the infamous bomb Catwoman (2004). Pitof thought that the screenplay (which Jiang wrote himself) was so terrible that, upon reading it, he immediately hired Michael Ryan to do major rewrites, producing a screenplay that was more reminiscent of Clash of the Titans (2010). Jiang, unfortunately, hated Ryan's script, and after multiple fights over it, Pitof eventually quit before production began. Lawrence, who Jiang had initially passed over, was hired next, and held the same opinion of Jiang's script; he ultimately left the film due to both problems receiving his pay and concerns over conditions on set. Canadian director Michael French was next in the director's chair; due to a preexisting work commitment, he could only shoot for three months, and he decided to shoot the film as a comedy, owing to both his background in the genre and (again) the fact that he thought the script was incredibly campy. Scott Miller, the son of sports documentarian Warren Miller, was the one who finally finished it.

      >Lawrence wasn't the only one whose paychecks came late or not at all. Foreign extras who grumbled about not getting paid were met with visits from the police to check their visas, while Maulion ultimately quit the film over $30,000 he was owed that failed to materialize.
      >No OSHA Compliance was in full effect on set. Scenes were shot in caves with random falling rocks, in remote locations where access to a rescue helicopter could not be guaranteed if anything went wrong, and (for underwater scenes) in a diving tank with lights hanging just a few inches above the water that was kept clean simply by dumping more chlorine into it. Actors and crew worked in very non-union conditions; work days ran up to 22 hours straight at points, with no heaters, no water, and few breaks for food and rest. For the mermen, the glue used to hold their prosthetics to their bodies wound up being toxic and irritating their skin. When actress Irena Violette quit the production out of fear for her safety, not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
      >The few people who have seen the finished film have described it as one of the most unintentionally hilarious things they'd ever witnessed, such that it could become a Cult Classic on the "bad movie" circuit if it were ever released. Jiang, for his part, still insists that Empires of the Deep will see the light of day.

      This feels The Rings of Power, but with a chinese dude instead of Bezos.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It really doesn't.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >it has never been released despite being all but finished.

      Frick this made me kek. I figured it at least got a Chinese release. The absolute fricking hubris.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Lawrence Kasanoff and a Threshold Entertainment employee, Joshua Wexler, created the concept in 1999. A $25 million joint investment into the project was made by Threshold and the Korean investment company Natural Image, with the producers expecting that foreign pre-sales and loans against the sales would provide the remaining portion of the budget. The estimated remainder was $50 million.
    >Kasanoff also decided to produce and direct the film, despite having no prior experience in the animation field.
    >In December 2002, Kasanoff reported that hard drives containing most unfinished assets from the film had been stolen, in what he called an act of "industrial espionage" and "an incredibly complex crime". An investigation, which included the United States Secret Service, was unable to find the thief.
    >Lionsgate established a distribution deal and the financing company StoryArk represented investors who gave $20 million in funding to Threshold in 2005 due to the Lionsgate deal, the celebrity voice actors, and the product tie-ins.
    >Finally, in 2011, the film was auctioned for $2.5 million.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >FOOOOOOD.......... FIIIIIIIGHT (2002)!
      stopped watching there

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Some homosexual youtuber made a video about it. Might have been IHE.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Don't talk about Jontron like that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Survival of the fittest, Leonaaaard.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    If you enjoyed hearing about the nonsense of Empires of the Deep, here's a lengthy article detailing the entire production, someone did a pretty thorough deep dive into the whole thing.

    https://magazine.atavist.com/sunk

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >not only was her character written out of the film, but the producers tried to stop her from leaving the country; she needed help from Lawrence and an American consulate to return home.
      what a fricking shitshow

      >Two days later, no ticket had arrived. Liang told her that the production would not pay for her ticket and demanded that she repay all of the salary she’d earned so far.
      >Violette and Berg’s passports were at the production office, so Violette called an American consulate for help. The official on the phone advised them to make their way to the nearest U.S. consulate, either in Guangzhou or Shanghai.
      >The couple met with Lawrence to plan an escape. They decided that in the evening Lawrence would call an all-hands production meeting in the hotel lobby. While the crew was distracted, Violette and Berg would slip out a window.

      >That night, with the entire production gathered around the director, the couple scurried down a hallway unnoticed. They dumped their luggage out the window and crawled after it. Then they walked down to a riverbank beyond the hotel grounds and hiked along the river until they found a spot narrow enough to cross. They waded through the water, carrying their luggage above their heads, and then climbed up the steep embankment on the other side.
      >The next morning, the couple reached a police station in a town called Fuding. The police gave them travel papers and drove them to a train station, where they caught the 11 a.m. to Shanghai.
      >That night they checked into the Ritz-Carlton in Shanghai. The American consulate provided them with temporary passports and obtained Chinese exit visas. A few days later, they were on a plane to Los Angeles.

      >At the mountaintop hotel, Lawrence kept up a ruse that the couple were refusing to come out of their room. During mealtimes, he would take a tray of food into their room and dump it out the window.
      >Eventually, the crew demanded that Violette return to the movie. Lawrence knocked on the door one last time.
      >“Hey guys, it’s me,” he said. He went into the room and emerged moments later to face the Chinese crew with the truth. “They’re gone.”

      kek, what the actual shit?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Frick the actual movie getting released, make a film ABOUT this movie

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This is why you don't give your passport to someone for safekeeping or whatever. lol, lmao

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          agreed, but in general I think just "don't go to china" is also good advice to bear in mind

          frick that whole country

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >don't go to china
            Almost everytime I hear that word rekt threads on /gif start popping up in my head. There's good people but fricking hell, it's like another world in some places.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Any time there's TOO MANY people in a place there's an inevitable decline in general standards

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Some countries give special permission to employers, so a foreigner can travel there without too much paperwork. Said companies require your passport so you won't commit a crime and run way. Basically, if you're an actor or a model, you can just jump on a plane and be on Russia tomorrow for a photoshoot.
          I see your point, but I see why some companies do this too.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >A movie so incompetently and shadily made, a spy movie broke out in the middle of filming

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >escaped

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Interestingly, Olga Kurylenko is mentioned just twice in this whole article despite being the only real celebrity involved and seemingly being pushed as the star, first to say she was cast for some name value and paid 1 million, second to say she arrived to shoot her scenes, was well liked on set and had no issues.

      Seems like she basically got paid, got in, got out, end of story.
      By the looks of that trailer above she was playing some kind of queen character, so I'm guessing she was not in the film nearly as much as the posters with just her on them implied.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder if actors ever wonder if the film they're in even released. Like sure, you got paid, but you also worked with those people. Sorely you would have some interest that there is a movie you did that will never be seen

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Depends on the movie. Sometimes you really care about a role, it's important to you, or you feel it's really high quality. Other times it's just a job. A plumber doesn't think much about the toilet he fixed two months ago.

          Sometimes then, it's a job but it's also a miserable experience for whatever reason, you tend to remember those. Seems like compared to the other people in the movie she got off easy.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        her agent probably negiotiated well

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, she’s beautiful.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          And should have had a bigger career, always seemed to be in supporting roles.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The merman costumes were full-body rubber outfits with nubs meant to look like coral. The actors’ faces would be painted green, with fins affixed to their heads. The suits were too loose and needed to be glued to the actors’ skin. (With actual glue. In a blog post, one merman extra recalled that his skin became irritated; when he checked the adhesive bottle, he noticed a warning label that read “AVOID CONTACT WITH SKIN” in large print.)
      kek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >At one point, Lawrence saw a crew member being kicked in the head by a camera operator. He rushed to step in, but Hai Tao, the assistant director, held him back and told him not to get involved. The stunt team operated independently of Lawrence, and he wasn’t on hand for most of the stunt shoots. Lawrence had no power over the team, but he heard reports that the stuntmen’s safety was being compromised. There were regular accidents, and one stuntman, after hours of being pulled around on ropes, quit in tears because of the pain.

      ....

      >Then a scene took the crew to a cave set, where the script called for Silver Eye, Atlas’s alter ego, to free Greek merchants captured by “Thracian Marauders”—pirates. The crew had prepared a massive, unruly horse for Polites:

      >The cave was dark and cold. The crew wore hard hats; the actors did not. The horse was difficult. The script called for the animal to jump over a feasting table, but instead it reared around excitedly, frightening the extras, some of whom were chained to the cave’s wall. Then suddenly a chunk of rock the size of a manhole cover came crashing from the roof and crushed a spotlight.

      Yeesh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >A few days after the cave scene, Lawrence, Polites, Maulion, Violette, and Berg, along with some of the Chinese crew members and translators, hiked out to scout a shooting location situated on a rocky riverbed. It had been raining for days, and the rocks were covered with wet, slimy moss.

      >As a safety measure, the crew had laid carpet over the rocks and hired carpenters to build a handrail along a particularly difficult section. Still, there were spots so precarious that the group needed to get down on all fours and crawl.

      >The hike took an hour, and once they arrived the Americans debated with their translators and a few Chinese crew members about whether it was possible to shoot there at all: The costume and makeup tents had to be set up at a distance from the shooting location, and Irena Violette and the mermaid actors would need to walk over slippery rocks with fins attached to their legs.

      >Violette was particularly concerned that she might get hurt. Nobody even knew how long it would take to get to the closest hospital.
      >“If I slip and fall, is there a helicopter?” Violette said.
      >Lawrence asked one of the translators if the movie had medical insurance. The translator said that it did but that there was no evacuation plan.
      >“If somebody falls and breaks their neck or their skull, what’s the backup?” Lawrence asked.
      >“They say they will take the fastest measure,” the translator said.

      >Back at the hotel, Lawrence fought to scrap the location, and Rao agreed that it was unshootable. But Jiang, who was not on set, was unwavering; the rumor was that his girlfriend, Shi Yanfei, insisted on the spot.

      >Lawrence appealed to Hai Tao, the assistant director. Could he explain to Jiang that Lawrence didn’t want to shoot under such dangerous conditions? Jiang asked Hai Tao to tell Lawrence that if he didn’t do his job, he’d be fired. He took back his threat, but Lawrence reluctantly went ahead with the shoot anyway.

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Rejoice friends because all these flops will pale in comparison of the billion dollar show: Lawd dem Ringz

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Rejoice friends because all these flops will pale in comparison of the billion dollar show: Lawd dem Ringz
      Is this why my Prime membership keeps getting more expensive?
      Can't wait for it to flop and in 3 years the service will be nothing but The Boys and Invincible spinoffs.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know anybody who really likes those hobbit movies, yet they each made a billion dollars. People fricking love lord of the rings and some Black folk on the cast is not gonna change that.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They already are in the red because they build a whole fricking castle in New Zealand that they're not gonna use because of memerona. They moved all their production to England.
        People love Lord of the Rings, people love Peter Jackson, people love grandiose visuals and epic battles. This thing won't have any of those things. Just a loose adaptation that looks like shit.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Rejoice friends because all these flops will pale in comparison of the billion dollar show: Lawd dem Ringz

          Stop seething this hard at a TV show dude. It's not healthy.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >pointing out facts is seething
            Uh oh, the bot picked up the trigger words

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They are overbudget. You can't be on the red 3 months before your product even comes out, because you don't even know what the numbers will be.
          The hobbit looks like fricking garbage, the gimmicky 48fps, the bad cgi, the stretched out storyline, boring new characters, still a billion dollars each.
          We saw what? a few promotional pictures and a couple minute long teasers?
          I can guarantee we're getting a season 2, people fricking love their IP's, man, last star wars movie still made over a billion dollars, even this last woke harry potter garbage which everyone hated made over 400 million.
          I get that people really want this to fail, so they jump through hoops to justify why it will.
          I doubt it will have any staying power, they'll be lucky to get three seasons out of it, and I'm sure that numbers will be disappointing. But the IP is so big that disappointing is still enough to make some profit.
          Most normal poeople don't go: "is that a Black person hobbit? That's absurd! It doesn't fit with the homogeny of the races in the works of tolkien" they go "hey I like this product, there hasn't been a lotr thing in a decade, so maybe i'll check it out."
          I don't care about lotr and have no intention of watching this crap, I'm just being realistic.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Problem is when woke is all you have and all i've seen from the new lotr is woke. If this thing flops its going to be the most beautiful catastrophe of all time. Jeff Bezos is going to personally sodomize the show runners live on CNN.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Amazon will inflate metrics using buzzwords like "global watch time" and "simultaneous viewership" to make it seem like more people watched to completion than actually did. That's how streamers fleece their investors.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Quibi

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I wish Will.i.am's watch paradigm was a movie

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Produced by Walt Disney Pictures, Jerry Bruckheimer Films and Depp's Infinitum Nihil, production was plagued with problems and budgetary concerns, which at one point almost led to the film's premature cancellation. The film then premiered at the Hyperion Theater on June 22, 2013, and was released theatrically in the United States on July 3, 2013. The film received generally negative reviews from critics, and grossed only $260.5 million worldwide against an estimated $225–250 million production budget and an additional $150 million in marketing costs, making it one of the biggest box-office bombs of all time, losing Disney over $160–190 million.
    >Compared to Despicable Me 2, a film that opened the same weekend to $142.1 million on a $76 million budget, The Wall Street Journal noted that The Lone Ranger made just under a third of that ($48.9 million) and had more than three times the budget ($215 million). Nearly 68% of ticket buyers were over 25 years old and nearly 25% over 50 years old, a much higher percentage than is typical for the studio. Disney viewed the film's international performance ($24.3 million from 24 markets), including that of Russia and Australia, as "softer than we would have liked."
    >The New York Times and USA Today reported that The Lone Ranger joined a string of high-concept western films that failed at the box office, such as Wild Wild West (1999), which cost $170 million but grossed $222.1 million; Jonah Hex (2010), which cost $47 million but grossed less than $11 million; and Cowboys & Aliens (2011), which cost $160 million but grossed $174 million. Chief analyst for Boxoffice Phil Contrino described the film's box office performance as "the kind of bomb that people discuss for years to come" due to its use of otherwise successful director, producer and stars.
    >Filmmaker Quentin Tarantino called the film one of the ten best films of 2013 through October.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Quentin Tarantino called the film one of the ten best films of 2013 through October.
      the cherry on top

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Lone Ranger didn't deserve the hate it got. I assumed it was a big stinker and never saw it until years and years later and by then the frenzy of people shitting all over it had faded. Some plot threads were neglected but in general is was an alright movie. Fintchner as a hammy evil antagonist was great as usual and the big stupid literal trainwreck finale was fun. My favorite part of all though was Hans Zimmer letting it all hang out writing that musical shitpost that is the finale. Variations on a Theme of the William Tell Overture with 500 horns that just never ends. Obviously the superior western costarring Johnny Depp is Rango but to be disappointed by a reboot of the fricking Lone Ranger in 2013 because it's too silly is baffling to me. It's a good time if you pull your head out of your ass.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's not wise to correlate box office failure with film quality. Absolutely, there are shit films that do shit at the box office, but there's no hard rule, great films or even just ok films bomb and lose obscene amounts of money all through cinema history.

        Battlefield Earth for instance, really is total trash, I've seen it, it bombed for a good reason, but then Waterworld didn't "bomb" but it was so expensive it didn't make money, and the whole media zoo around the film had it be branded as some dire piece of shit because it lost money. For months before that film came out, its ballooning budget and star's ego were all the talk in showbiz media. But once removed from all that circus, now someone can watch the film free of bias or expectations and usually it's held to be a very well made action film with some lackluster narrative execution of its premise and a dull as dishwater performance from Costner. A lot of that is rectified in the longer Ulysses cut (which interestedly started as a fan edit, taking the deleted scenes added in the TV edit but restoring the violence and graphic content cut for said TV edit, but now has been officially done and released as a real cut included with the Waterworld blu-ray), which adds back a lot of worldbuilding elements, and ends up I think a pretty strong action film.

        Anyway, the bottom line is sometimes movies get a myth about them, like Long Ranger lost hundreds of millions of dollars and Depp was doing his Wacky Depp Thing again, it must be horrible. After all, a film bombing meant not a lot of people actually saw it. But as you saw, it's an overlong but perfectly solid action film from a director who knows how to direct action.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Waterworld is a piece of shit, though.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >armie hammer
      That guy was in a lot of duds. That fentanyl one was a fricking stinker.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        And then he got accused of cannabilism or something, an unlucky actor.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, I rarely defend degenerates, but it sounds like all he did was disclose a weird fantasy which he held in check, and then some c**t wanted a payday and 15 minutes, and made him out to be the Marquis de Sade. I honestly feel bad for the guy. Good actor with a string of duds, then gets the rug pulled before he can redeem himself.

          He should've been K in BR2049.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            He does seems to be box office poison regardless.
            Or perhaps box office apathy is a better term, like those three aussies

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Lone Ranger didn't deserve the hate it got. I assumed it was a big stinker and never saw it until years and years later and by then the frenzy of people shitting all over it had faded. Some plot threads were neglected but in general is was an alright movie. Fintchner as a hammy evil antagonist was great as usual and the big stupid literal trainwreck finale was fun. My favorite part of all though was Hans Zimmer letting it all hang out writing that musical shitpost that is the finale. Variations on a Theme of the William Tell Overture with 500 horns that just never ends. Obviously the superior western costarring Johnny Depp is Rango but to be disappointed by a reboot of the fricking Lone Ranger in 2013 because it's too silly is baffling to me. It's a good time if you pull your head out of your ass.

        Quentin Tarantino called the film one of the ten best films of 2013 through October.
        the cherry on top

        they can never see the forest for the trees... wonder how many exec's pointed out that the lone ranger was extremely popular in the '50s if you wanted to capitalize on that success then you can't wait 60 years. can only imagine how many people below the age of 30 know who tonto is

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      [...]
      they can never see the forest for the trees... wonder how many exec's pointed out that the lone ranger was extremely popular in the '50s if you wanted to capitalize on that success then you can't wait 60 years. can only imagine how many people below the age of 30 know who tonto is

      Seems to be a thing with that property. They tried in 81 when it was still relative fresh in people's minds and that tanked, owing heavily to the producers shooting themselves in the foot with an injunction preventing TV Lone Ranger Clayton Moore from appearing in costume.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I found it funny that Depp was portraying the Comanches in a sympathetic note when in reality they were known as the fricking Mongols of the American plains and were utterly rapacious bastards even by plain indian standards.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The giant problem is that when people think about Indians, they think about them like white people in the future. They don't bother looking into the past and seeing what they said about each other. There were some strong opinions on who the buttholes were and who were civilized people.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The issue is always that Indian tribes get lumped into one big....lump. Either tree hugging hippies or scalp taking animals. Reality is there were hundreds of tribes all over the land and not only were they extremely varied often with absolutely frick all in common between distant tribal regions, but much of their history and culture has been lost since, especially languages.

          You had tribes that lived in permanent stone dwellings and were agriculturalists, and then you had ones like the aforementioned psycho Mongol-esque raiders like the Comanche. It doesn't all fit under one tent. Or is that tepee? Huurrr

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, there's a scene in Hell or High Water or one of the leads clashes with a Native guy over blackjack, and he asks the lead if he knows what "Comanche" means, which he doesn't. He tells him it means "Enemy". That is to say, "Enemy of Everyone, Everywhere".

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Sean Connery's last film.
    >Budget £15,000,000
    >Box office £15,000

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >he turned down Gandalf for League of Gentlemen

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I think he would've sucked as gandalf

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          He would have been great. Probably should have just stopped at finding forrester though, that was a good one to go out on.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You're probably right. I haven't seen him in pic related and he's considered one of the greats so yeah.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He didn't turn it down FOR League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, that was released like four years after LOTR began filming. He turned down Gandalf because he doesn't understand fantasy films, then after the trilogy was a huge hit he figured he might as well say yes next time whether he understood it or not, unfortunately said next time was League, which was so bad it convinced him to retire.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    These characters are frick ugly. Who gave this 40 million dollars?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Fools

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Domestic Box Office Gross: $30

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >dead ahead
      Uh huh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wow that's what that frickin movie looks like? All I ever knew about it was the title and that it grossed 30 dollars from like one cinema for a week. I assumed it was some indie drama, that cast and cover looks more like a thriller.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The similarly-named film Zzyzx has mistakenly been cited as the lowest-grossing of all time instead, due to the two films' similar titles and release in the same month.
      How does this even happen?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >cat steps on your keyboard to name your film
        >someone else names their film the same thing after their cat also steps on their keyboard
        top kek

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They are actually both named for the same place, Zzyzx. They probably both take place. So two movies both featuring the same specific road came out in the same month and were both little seen thriller films.

          Weird.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wew lads. We're definitely not all gonna make it off of that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >From February 25 to March 2, 2006, Zyzzyx Road was shown once a day, at noon, at the Highland Park Village Theater in Dallas, Texas, in one auditorium rented by the producers for $1,000. The limited release was deliberate: Grillo was uninterested in releasing the film domestically until it underwent foreign distribution, but the film needed to fulfill the U.S. release obligation required by the Screen Actors Guild for low-budget films.

      >The strategy had the side effect of making it, at the time, the lowest-grossing film in history; it earned just $30 at the box office, from six patrons paying $5 each for admission. Unofficially, its opening weekend netted $20, with the $10 difference due to Grillo personally refunding two tickets purchased by Sheila Moore, the film's makeup artist, who saw the film with a friend.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >with the $10 difference due to Grillo personally refunding two tickets purchased by Sheila Moore, the film's makeup artist, who saw the film with a friend
        This is actually pretty cute

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The similarly-named film Zzyzx has mistakenly been cited as the lowest-grossing of all time instead, due to the two films' similar titles and release in the same month.
      How does this even happen?

      >cat steps on your keyboard to name your film
      >someone else names their film the same thing after their cat also steps on their keyboard
      top kek

      >From February 25 to March 2, 2006, Zyzzyx Road was shown once a day, at noon, at the Highland Park Village Theater in Dallas, Texas, in one auditorium rented by the producers for $1,000. The limited release was deliberate: Grillo was uninterested in releasing the film domestically until it underwent foreign distribution, but the film needed to fulfill the U.S. release obligation required by the Screen Actors Guild for low-budget films.

      >The strategy had the side effect of making it, at the time, the lowest-grossing film in history; it earned just $30 at the box office, from six patrons paying $5 each for admission. Unofficially, its opening weekend netted $20, with the $10 difference due to Grillo personally refunding two tickets purchased by Sheila Moore, the film's makeup artist, who saw the film with a friend.

      They are actually both named for the same place, Zzyzx. They probably both take place. So two movies both featuring the same specific road came out in the same month and were both little seen thriller films.

      Weird.

      >They are actually both named for the same place, Zzyzx. They probably both take place. So two movies both featuring the same specific road came out in the same month and were both little seen thriller films.

      >The similarly-named film Zzyzx has mistakenly been cited as the lowest-grossing of all time instead, due to the two films' similar titles and release in the same month.

      imagine being a zyzzyxhead in 2006. must feel like heaven

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ZYZZYXCHADS RISE UP

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        did they not go to location how do you not notice someone else is also making a movie about a road in the middle of nowhere

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    And he's instantly off crying about "shills" or something. Predictable and boring.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >conflates bot and shilling as the same concept
      Uh oh, bot hasn't upgraded his lexicon

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Monster Trucks (2016)
    >Budget: $125 million
    >Box Office: $64.5 million

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ooh, I know this one, this has some funny bits about it. Don't move over the spoiler til you've finished, trust me.

      >The pitch was created by Paramount's president Adam Goodman alongside his four year old son.

      >The release date was shifted several times. It was initially set for May 29, 2015, but on January 26, 2015, the film was pushed back to December 25, 2015, a date first assigned for Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation. On May 5, 2015, the film was pushed back again, to March 18, 2016. On November 10, 2015, the film's release date was pushed back one final time, to January 13, 2017

      >On September 21, 2016, The Hollywood Reporter stated Paramount would take a $115 million writedown on the film because of its expected poor performance at the box office.

      Now for the best bit

      >Creech, the protagonist's titular Monster Truck, had to be heavily redesigned due to a complete disaster of a test screening in which the original design terrified most of the children in the audience who screamed in horror when he first appeared. Following the test screening, during which at least half the audience of children left with their parents, executives delayed the film demanding a total redesign.
      You can see above the final design is like a cartoon shark. Here is the original design.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what the frick were they thinking

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        alright THAT is hilarious

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the guy that reported on that screening describing the original design as "a cross between a squid, Judge Doom and a moronic E.T."

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm laughing so fricking hard right now. Unironically WHAT were they THINKING?!?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >I'm laughing so fricking hard right now. Unironically WHAT were they THINKING?!?

          The entire film is because the president's 4 year old thought up a pun title. That's it. It's not like this is some great script that they were sitting on by some hot new writer. This is pure idiotic nepotism.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It should be written into law that CEOs can be publically flogged by their employees with no consequence if they turn out failure ideas.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't understand how the mechanic so the monster truck works at all. The truck drives like a normal truck, but the monster takes up all the space where the engine would be. How does the monster propell the truck? It's some shark creature.

      It's also too horifying looking for a kid's movie.

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I've only seen the Eddie Murphy Dr Dolittle movies

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I actually saw Delgo in theatres when it came out
    It deserved to flop. I went with most of my grade school class for a birthday and we mostly ended up throwing ice and popcorn at each other instead of watching

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >1990s trailer voice
    this came out in 2008?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      trailer voice
      >this came out in 2008?

      Delgo? LOL. It's likely they recorded the trailer very early in production, like maybe 1999 or 2000. It got delayed and took forever so it was 2008.

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Shocked I'd never heard of this Empires of the Deep business before, what a hilarious rollercoaster.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      really wish this got released, it would have been schlock kino

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Given the whole text about this movie, I wonder if that fella was threatened to just smile and feign gladness.

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Fun thread, thanks.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *