>OOH LOOK AT ME AND MY TINY BRAIN, IM SO LE DUMB, BECAUSE I LOOK AT A SCREEN AND DON’T THINK, GUESS IM DUMBER THAN A DOG! IM SPECIAAAL!
This post was made by Cinemaphile - Literature gang.
>OOH LOOK AT ME AND MY TINY BRAIN, IM SO LE DUMB, BECAUSE I LOOK AT A SCREEN AND DONT THINK, GUESS IM DUMBER THAN A DOG!
There is no "Sneed" equivalent in all of literature. You are a failure.
/lit/bros... its fricking OVER the sneedGODS won.....
>he doesn't know
BART GET OUT IM PISS
Pussy pussy
I am absolutely fricking shaking.
The post that saved Cinemaphile
True. Cinemaphile NEEDS memes. Its been a frickin dry board for years
>GUESS IM DUMBER THAN A DOG!
hey... some dogs are pretty smart
im getting WAKU WAKU
Call of the Crocodile
Yes there is
>“You had an arse full of farts that night, darling, and I f*cked them out of you, big fat fellows, long windy ones, quick little merry cracks and a lot of tiny little naughty farties ending in a long gush from your hole.”
James Joyce 1909
Wow you are fricking seething, smooth brain.
I look like that and say that
But seriously, when you compare ganes, tv, and books, which is the highest form of entertainment? Which is best form of art?
*games
It’s books, duh.
It's all mindless fodder. Fiction literature is just as dumb as movies, TV, and games.
Stop reading “Urban Literature”.
>Quantavarius walked in. You could see his giant dick. Samsaratisha mouth like started watering and shit. This b***h was droolin cause Q’s game was tight as frick. Then he fricked her. Then gun shots went through the damn walls in the room they were in! “Aw shit, frick you homiez!” Q jumped out the bed and pulled out a gatling gun he kept under his bed and shot back at them homiez. Bam! Headshot! Bam! Another Headshot! Bam! All head shots! But then he looked out the window and realized he shot his own brother! “Damn. Fool ass homie tryna hustle.”
This. How do people enjoy reading something someone else just made up. The only purpose of fiction is to get an idea about what other time periods were like, and nonfiction is usually much better about this.
smartest Cinemaphile user
Yeah, at least what I've read is pure shit. But reality is more than interesting enough, and there's too much good nonfiction to read in a hundred lifetimes.
I don't play vidya but do read a lot & watch tv & movies, kino only of course. Why act like all of these things don't compliment & enhance each other?
Music + your own writing trumps all. Then literature, then video games, and then tvmovies
>Music + your own writing trumps all
sigma
it varies because no one medium is inherently going to produce better art. Anybody can write a book, and there is a lot of shit out there. Saying book, or movies, or anime, or video games are intrinsically better is a fallacy. If you ask a Cinemaphilegay and they really think ass goblins of auschwitz is intrinsically more enjoyable, more artistic, or has more meaning than let's say for example 2001 a space odyssey. Well I have good news for you. It's called autism.
replying to my own posts but it's funny how pretentious bookgays despite all their wisdom and iq points couldn't figure this out..... Wow almost like there is more to life than... garbage ass fiction literature written by a dead guy.
Saying that atheism in principle cannot create a nice society is also a fallacy - yet... 20th century.... and our intuition about this stuff...
On average and almost with no exception video games have doshit stories, movies abuse books and are lesser than books and yea even if books are cheap to write (Which is a good sign, barrier of entry is low) they tend to be the superior medium for everything.
While this, the means of consumption is intrinsically more proactive with literature. It's good for the brain.
>Solve a puzzle or be punished while taking steps to move or change the story isn't intrinsically proactive.
It's obviously books and anyone who thinks otherwise is a readlet
>entertainment
jej this is peak mcdonalds thinking
Books and then concept art for said books that's truly artistic.
Video games are just cheap tricks, they're a dopamine maze.
art music >>> literary fiction > art film / animation > folk music >>> genre fiction > vidya > popular music = movies / television / anime
art is lame
saying this after understanding the discourse of art history through modernist movements (dadaism, surrealism, expressionism etc) into the contemporary conception of art is intelligent
saying this because you have a reflex conditioned by the deteriorating cultural faculties of our present moment is peak smoothbrain moronation. most people unfortunately fall into the latter unless they're some type of autistic savant
art is stupid
What's the difference between literary fiction and genre fiction?
Who cares, just enjoy what you like
anyone who says "games" is a massive homosexual, I know that much
I don't know but books at least train you to stay so what focused at the same time
S11 E5 of the Simpsons
books. there's merit in other arts, but literature is the highest form.
For me, it's gobbo games from gay95. The truest form of art.
Entertainment - games
Art - books
music > books > movies > tv > games
Shitposting and ruining peoples lives
Only games have gameplay. They win by default.
The more abstract the higher the art form
>poetry
>literature
>music
>painting
>plays and opera
>film
>television
>literal shit in a toilet
>video games
>anime and cartoons
>film and television more abstract than cartoons
how
Comic books are art in both writing and art. Problem is that just like with animation it gets stigmatized with being made for mostly manchildren (in the past few years though it's made for alphabet people) so it never properly expanded into a mature form of artistic medium.
Such a shame too because if it weren't for the Comics Code Authority anchoring down the growth of the comic book industry we wouldn't get so much capeshit today.
>visuals are inferior to paintings, movies or animation
>writing is inferior to literature, movies and animation
Comic books are legitimately the worst. And they *are* for manchildren.
ah yes because comic books are either wall of texts or oil canvas paintings and not the cohesion of writer and artist working together to create a story. Nothing gets passed you.
Anything created by you that the world couldn't possibly understand
>Which is best form of art?
the one you create yourself
It's all consumption. None of it is art.
>he just sits there and stares at a screen because he's too dumb for vidya
oh no no no
/v/chads stay winning
>reading books
imagine cucking your own imagination
im unironically level 5 therefore superior
images are a waste of processing power
And yet you can imagine flopping penises with exact precision
Literally how? Look at an apple, then look away. You can't imagine what it looks like right after seeing it?
See
Imagine having to cope this hard so you don't have a nice day. Poor anon.
I have a hard time believing 2, 3, and 4 exist. Either you can picture things or you can't. Why would there be arbitrary limits to what you can picture in your mind?
Why would there not be arbitrary limits? Do you think people just walk around with unlimited mind power? Do you think every chess player can play blindfolded?
>Why would there not be arbitrary limits?
...why would there be?
>Do you think people just walk around with unlimited mind power?
What's that supposed to mean? I'm pretty sure most people can actually picture things in their mind. You know, basic imagination.
>Do you think every chess player can play blindfolded?
No, that would require amazing memory.
>...why would there be?
Because brain power is limited?
>What's that supposed to mean? I'm pretty sure most people can actually picture things in their mind. You know, basic imagination.
Yes, basic imagination. Not 1080p imagination.
>Because brain power is limited?
I'm glad to have a superior brain then. At least I can picture things accurately.
Glad I could help. It’s the stage 5 people who can’t picture anything at all that scare me.
Yeah, I can't even imagine how their minds work. Picturing things is such a basic thing. I wonder if the skill can be trained? Maybe not for those people who are already unable to see anything, but perhaps there could be some way of honing the ability for people who are at level 2, 3 or 4. I wouldn't be surprised if practising visual arts would also help to develop someone's skill to picture things with their mind's eye.
I feel like 2-4 is just their way of trying to say difference in quality while visualizing, like say you can picture the right color but it's more a ball than an apple shape
>there are people who can picture a ball in their mind but not an apple
This is absurd to me.
Ok, imagine a color that you've never seen before.
I wish zoomers cucked their own imagination. Then maybe they would stop starting every condescending statement with “imagine not sucking fat wieners like me”
me on the left, out of frame, tier 0, as in my entire head becomes the apple, because i am so creative and intelligent and also attractive
A friend of mine claims to be level five. But he also has Dyspraxia, which is a whole other condition that makes things tricky.
I thought everyone was 1 until just a few months ago when discussing this. I can't think in text or anything. I see it all clear ahead of me.
I actually can imagine pretty clearly, but for some reason I can't imagine well heads and faces
Books are better.
I like tv and movies but reading is very relaxing.
What am I looking at here? Turbopleb confessions?
Platoon + Frankenstein would be a perfect evening though.
My all time favorite stuff. I like it when people shit on my taste
Really curious about how old the person behind this pic is.
I'm 26
Blood in the Garden was funny as frick.
You c**ts all complain day in and day out about how terrible modern television is how all your favourite franchises have been ruined by the israelites yet if somebody even dares say you'll find more entertainment reading of an evening, you lose your damn minds.
Let's not act like literature hasn't been ruined as well.
best thing about literature is you have like 3,000 years of content
>look how smart I am
>i'm reading a book written by a pre industrial caveman and I think it has any meaning whatsoever to read still.
wow and you guys call yourselves smart.
not sure if bait or cope
It's moronation.
>wow and you guys call yourselves smart
compared to what? your stupid as frick post? yeah, i'm a regular Alfred Einstein
>I'm going to read a book written back when barely anybody was literate and basically nothing in society was like it is now. Boy I sure do have a lot to learn and think about!!!!!! English not even standardized yet? Can't wait to check out these great mind expanding books!
>literally nothing from the era this was written holds true to the modern day, better apply the themes and metaphors to the real world!!!
Read the Miller’s Tale and tell me it doesn’t hold up.
Tell me why it does hold up
>old man marries much younger wife whom he fails to satisfy
>rents out room to college student for extra cash
>student tries to seduce the wife
>only takes a few sweet words before he does
>wife goes to church, probably not confessing her adultery
>textbook beta metrosexual character is also interested
>wife takes his gifts but doesn’t put out
All of this could happen in the present day. Much of the rest of the tale could not, but that’s what makes it interesting. Also the slapstick and toilet humor holds up very well. Seriously read it.
sounds like boring cuckshit, read some Dostoevsky or Kafka instead
So you do agree that lots of elements in this 14th century book are similar to today?
Yes, for sure. Human nature has barely changed since pre-fire times, doesn't mean I want to read Miller's Tale though.
Good, as long as you see that now
>literally
zoomzooms who were assigned YA in highschool english need to work on their diction if they wish to be taken seriously
so going by your logic, you have never watched kino that has been made before your birth nor kino that depicts a time before your birth or well after your death nor kino that takes place in a country beside your own nor kino that is not a documentary
>If its not about me I can't relate
jesus wept. I hope the earth fricking explodes before you have the chance to reproduce
Yeah well movies you still have around 100 years of content, at least 60-50 of which is palatable to most modern viewers
Why read when you can imagine your own stories? Reading can be just as bad as watching tv.
This but unironically. I have no imagination so when I read a book I see very little in my head and what I do see has minimal detail. This is why I prefer books that have been adapted to television or film, so I can actually picture what’s going on. Shit sucks.
NPC moment
I bet your parents never read to you as a kid.
Of course they did.
most books and most movies are garbage but I don't have to watch a movie for 20 hours to realize it's garbage. no time for that shit.
If you can't tell a book is worth your time after 50 pages you might be moronic. If it takes you 20 hours to read 50 pages you are moronic
50 pages is barely one or two chapters, usually they turn shitty around halfway through or more.
I have never had a hard time telling if the writing style, content or characters are compelling enough by page 50 to keep reading or not.
>no good books written for like 50 years so every good book is extremely outdated and means nothing to anybody
>bookgays, b-b--but I'm superior for reading an irrelevant 100 year old story written by a dead guy before computers even existed.....
kek
I made that Cinemaphile thread
Frick off back yo your library, nerd. Me and the bros are enjoying some kino here
Post archive
still up
guy on the left needs to think about "ABC" and "123" while the guy on the right exists in a state of pure Zen
LMAO you fricking idiot. You can't delete your stupidity.
TV shows, news channels, talk shows - that's a 100% valid criticism.
Hollywood movies nowadays that you could pirate on demand? Meh not really working there.
I have to tell you, I really hate visual media. They do not hold my interest.
video games combine the best aspects of all other media while also providing physical interactivity. objectively the best entertainment medium
>t. braindead moron
It’s actually inferior to other media in everything but the interactivity. Video games definitely have the most potential but they haven’t reached it yet.
Somebody post the Roger Ebert copypasta about how games are games, not art.
video games can never be true art unlike film or literature since they are truly limited by the definitions of player interactivity
90% of games require character movement and the solving of logic based puzzles, this just comes with the medium, it's not art, it's a show, and you're clapping like a seal at every level
I play autistic sandbox simulation style video games. They're actually different from other media because you're figuring out an intricate interactive system rather than being told a narrative.
Reading is for slow-brained people
based Tate dabbing on pseuds
5 billion IQ homie right here, I wish I was too smart to read books
>to feel contempt
maybe this loser should read?
Smartest tiktok user
>I like books
>Cinemaphile
>exists
>never browse or post there
>mfw
Don't worry, they don't read books.
how do I browse books?
It's hard to "into" Cinemaphile because they have a very specific culture. Certain books have more discussion than others. They still can't get their heads around Infinite Jest.
Who can?
That was me too till a couple months ago I tried to start a discussion on Jung. The place is an absolute shit show
I’ve been reading some of the books from it’s top 100. So far I’m impressed
Cinemaphile is too pretentious to talk about 40k novels.
They get a lot of discussion on the scifi general there
I hate all the ~~*Einstein*~~ worship in pop science. Newton was a god fearing Christian who discovered practical physics. Harvey Einstein made up a bunch of nonsense just to one-up hardworking physicists in the name of the israelites
>pop science
Wow it is almost as if you were an actual scientist, like the ones who post on Cinemaphile about how global warming is fake and the vaccines are fake.
Art itself is nothing to write home about. It is just a word. An idea. Unfortunately, this notion does not correspond to anything real.
filtered and npc pilled
The best discussions happen on Cinemaphile. Wow. I can’t even keep up.
why is the savage detectives 600 pages long
just started this shit
The Nancy Boys?
Go ‘way!
Batin’
>LOOKIE LOOK AT THE WORD WOWZIES IM LE SMART CONSOOMING THE EXACT SAME CONTENT AS MOVIES BUT SLOWER
okay boomer
I really don't get the nazi comparison.
Technology is nazism
>Nazis are bad
>Youth culture is bad
That's as far as it goes
It's literally just
>Nazis bad
>phones bad
It's boomerbrain humor, you wouldn't get it unless you were spending all your free time watching cable TV with the occasional going on a cruise peppered here and there.
Old good new bad
Why do boomers pretend they've ever read a book in their entire lives?
My parents watch more TV and look at their phones more than I do.
The tv is missing the star of David
Explain why video games isn't a valid answer for the top of the hierarchy without resorting to memes.
how is jumping around a 3D space looking for coins anything of merit
>hurr durr bing bing wahoo Mario is the only video game that exists
I said without resorting to memes
Okay, how is jumping around a 3D space looking for wumpa fruit anything of merit?
Isn’t that correct?
Well there’s also story depth which but that picture doesn’t account for it so I don’t see why video games isn’t valid.
Unironically true though
Naive moron zoomer
Anyone can watch a movie.
Most cannot muster the concentration to finish a 200 page novel.
Makes ya think.
There are good movies and there a good books.
I don’t see a foundation for an argument here. You’re comparing apples to oranges
warm giant pretzel vibranium with mustard
literally me
I only read murder mysteries and non fiction. If you're into Cinemaphile shit and is reading fantasy, you really have no right to think you're above anyone
what non fiction do you read?
Cinemaphile.
>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
>Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
>Based on a true story
>But no likeness intended to any person or event
>Nor were any animals harmed
cast them
/lit/erature>Cinemaphileidya>film>>>>>>Wrong board>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Frick off artin
we are literally 451
no one reads anymore
>Cinemaphile is a single person
.. oh wait, it actually could be