Spider-Man tells Miles to let his dad die because it's a multiversal constant or something and that even if it seems bad it'll result in something good, like how Uncle Ben dying made him Spider-Man, essentially implying he'd just let Mayday die if it was a multiversal constant and not fight to try to save her, WHILE holding her in his arms
>essentially implying he'd just let Mayday die
I don't think that was implied at all. He used Mayday as an example of something good coming from tragedy
That's what he said out loud, what the scene inadvertently implied is that he'd let her die, just like he wants Miles to let his dad die in the scene, or is he a heartless hypocrite?
That's like the most basic reading of the scene imaginable beyond taking it at face value
>what the scene inadvertently implied
That's not what's implied, that's your insane bullshit
>Peter tells Miles letting his dad die in a canon event is a good thing >this means Peter thinks letting your own family die for a canon event is a good thing >this means Peter would let Mayday die in a canon event
I really don't see another way to interpret his words
1 week ago
Anonymous
>this means Peter would let Mayday die in a canon event
We already covered this, and you're wrong. I don't even like the movie and you somehow find a moronic way to look at it
1 week ago
Anonymous
>We already covered this, and you're wrong
We haven't, how is Miles letting his dad die for a canon event different from Peter letting his daughter die for a canon event
1 week ago
Anonymous
See post
>essentially implying he'd just let Mayday die
I don't think that was implied at all. He used Mayday as an example of something good coming from tragedy
. At no point is is stated nor implied that he would kill Mayday. You're legit fricking moronic
1 week ago
Anonymous
>At no point is is stated nor implied that he would kill Mayday
It is, when he captures Miles and tells him to let his dad die
1 week ago
Anonymous
You're conflicting two different things. How is it implying he'd let Mayday die when he's using her as an example of what good can come from a tragedy?
1 week ago
Anonymous
By stopping Miles from saving his dad, and then telling him to stop trying to save his dad, Peter is agreeing with Miguel's interpretation of canon events and the importance of letting them play out even if the life of a cherished family member is on the line.
That means if Miguel told Peter they discovered a new canon event in which Peter has to let Mayday die (like how Peter told Miles to let Jefferson die), Peter would agree with him and let her die without trying to save her, because he agrees with Miguel to the point of physically preventing Miles from saving his dad's life. The only alternative is that he's a hypocrite and thinks infinite multiverses are more important than Jefferson's life, but not more important than Mayday's life.
1 week ago
Anonymous
>That means if Miguel told Peter they discovered a new canon event in which Peter has to let Mayday die
That's not how it works you idiot. There's ONE canon event to create Spider-Man, that's it
1 week ago
Anonymous
Anon.. did you watch the movie
1 week ago
Anonymous
I did. Apparently a simple concept flew over your head, and you found the dumbest thing to rage over
Where is that from?
Boondocks
First Stinkmeaner episode.
The entire Booth Buddies episode of Star Vs
Without a doubt the worst scene in Spider-Man history by far, yes even worse than OMD
Never watch the movie what happened?
Spider-Man tells Miles to let his dad die because it's a multiversal constant or something and that even if it seems bad it'll result in something good, like how Uncle Ben dying made him Spider-Man, essentially implying he'd just let Mayday die if it was a multiversal constant and not fight to try to save her, WHILE holding her in his arms
>essentially implying he'd just let Mayday die
I don't think that was implied at all. He used Mayday as an example of something good coming from tragedy
That's what he said out loud, what the scene inadvertently implied is that he'd let her die, just like he wants Miles to let his dad die in the scene, or is he a heartless hypocrite?
Dude you are reading way too deeply into this.
That's like the most basic reading of the scene imaginable beyond taking it at face value
>Peter tells Miles letting his dad die in a canon event is a good thing
>this means Peter thinks letting your own family die for a canon event is a good thing
>this means Peter would let Mayday die in a canon event
I really don't see another way to interpret his words
>this means Peter would let Mayday die in a canon event
We already covered this, and you're wrong. I don't even like the movie and you somehow find a moronic way to look at it
>We already covered this, and you're wrong
We haven't, how is Miles letting his dad die for a canon event different from Peter letting his daughter die for a canon event
See post
. At no point is is stated nor implied that he would kill Mayday. You're legit fricking moronic
>At no point is is stated nor implied that he would kill Mayday
It is, when he captures Miles and tells him to let his dad die
You're conflicting two different things. How is it implying he'd let Mayday die when he's using her as an example of what good can come from a tragedy?
By stopping Miles from saving his dad, and then telling him to stop trying to save his dad, Peter is agreeing with Miguel's interpretation of canon events and the importance of letting them play out even if the life of a cherished family member is on the line.
That means if Miguel told Peter they discovered a new canon event in which Peter has to let Mayday die (like how Peter told Miles to let Jefferson die), Peter would agree with him and let her die without trying to save her, because he agrees with Miguel to the point of physically preventing Miles from saving his dad's life. The only alternative is that he's a hypocrite and thinks infinite multiverses are more important than Jefferson's life, but not more important than Mayday's life.
>That means if Miguel told Peter they discovered a new canon event in which Peter has to let Mayday die
That's not how it works you idiot. There's ONE canon event to create Spider-Man, that's it
Anon.. did you watch the movie
I did. Apparently a simple concept flew over your head, and you found the dumbest thing to rage over
>what the scene inadvertently implied
That's not what's implied, that's your insane bullshit
Truth be told that after 11 years im still mad
Honestly, Pumyra betraying Lion-O was way worse than that.
She was a double agent the whole time, so it technically wasn't betrayal. Still unsatisfying though.
Someone on staff hated the S2 Thundercats. They made Lynx-O a genocidal monster, Pumyra a zombie bug creature and Bengali doesn't get to exist at all.
Still feel that Kit-o is worst.
Bengali was supposed to show up as Tygra and Cheetara’s son.
Young people will never understand the rage.