Pick one, change becomes effective immediately

Pick one, change becomes effective immediately

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    A

  2. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    this is an easy B dude. If A bothers you that much you are a braindead boomer

  3. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B, easily

    CGI is not inherently a bad thing. Using it as a crutch is a bad thing.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      CGI is inherently a bad thing.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        How so? CGI is a tool like any other.

        There are plenty of bad practical effects. Hell, there are plenty of bad actors and bad directors - that doesn't mean we should avoid using any of them at all.

        CGI does not mean "replace entire backgrounds and characters with computer generated imagery". CGI can be very small enhancements that add a LOT to a film, or make otherwise impossible shots actually possible.

        They didn't, moron. Alien was not using CGI in the 70s. The alien in that movie is a guy in a suit.
        Terminator 2 uses CG and it's incredibly obvious when it's being used.

        Alien used CGI for all of the computer screens on the ship.
        Terminator 1 used CGI for the eye glow of the T-800

  4. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B no contest.

  5. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >CGI

  6. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B cgi is a necessary evil and lots of things would look terrible if you tried to do them practically, Godzilla King of Monsters for one

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      2000s suit Godzilla movies like Godzilla, Mothra, King Ghidorah and Godzilla Against Mechagodzilla look better than the CG Godzillas.

  7. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    A
    CG was the death of cinema and creativity.

  8. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >diversity quotas/ESG

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Nice toque.

  9. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    A. Media will get less gay again eventually anyway, but effects are never getting good again unless filmmakers are forced to stop being lazy.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      A
      CG was the death of cinema and creativity.

      A

      You people have no idea what "CGI" means

      CGI is best used when practical effects are completely impossible. You're never going to get a shot of the T-1000 walking through metal bars using practical-only effects.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >CGI is best used when practical effects are completely impossible.
        Obviously, but a world without CGI at all is better than the current world where CGI is almost exclusively used.
        Give me the look of Alien or Terminator 1 over any recent film.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          >he thinks Alien and Terminator 1 didn't use CGI
          lmao

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            They didn't, moron. Alien was not using CGI in the 70s. The alien in that movie is a guy in a suit.
            Terminator 2 uses CG and it's incredibly obvious when it's being used.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Compositing is not the same as CGI.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Zoomers don't realize that CGI looked like this in the early 80s. CG was rarely used heavily until the mid 90s.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Tron 1982 is mostly compositing and use of digital images in place of matte paintings. The glow on costumes and vehicles was also done frame by frame. Not really a CGI movie like the slop that came out in the '90s.
                >https://fronteffects.wordpress.com/2014/04/17/tron-1982-the-cult-movie-visual-effects-seen-through-interviews-with-harrison-ellenshaw-and-chris-casady/

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah I know, the best part of Tron is all the stuff they did besides the CG. The light cycle scenes are CGI however, and it's clear how primitive they are.
                Tron is a very cool movie.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                CGI in a sense. Again, not the way CG would come to be used. They were still using old-school compositing techniques. They were simply using CG graphics for matte paintings instead of actually digitally creating and animating characters, vehicles and movement. Not the same as say, The Lawnmower man or Spawn.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          They didn't, moron. Alien was not using CGI in the 70s. The alien in that movie is a guy in a suit.
          Terminator 2 uses CG and it's incredibly obvious when it's being used.

          "Another innovative special effect used in “The Terminator” was the use of computer-generated imagery (CGI). While CGI had been used in a number of previous films, the use of CGI in “The Terminator” was particularly noteworthy due to the way in which it was integrated with the practical effects. For example, the scene in which the Terminator’s eyes glow red was achieved through the use of CGI, which was combined with practical effects to create a seamless and realistic effect."

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            How so? CGI is a tool like any other.

            There are plenty of bad practical effects. Hell, there are plenty of bad actors and bad directors - that doesn't mean we should avoid using any of them at all.

            CGI does not mean "replace entire backgrounds and characters with computer generated imagery". CGI can be very small enhancements that add a LOT to a film, or make otherwise impossible shots actually possible.

            [...]
            Alien used CGI for all of the computer screens on the ship.
            Terminator 1 used CGI for the eye glow of the T-800

            >an eye glow
            Nobody means this when talking about CGI, and that's something they could have done through different methods pre-CG.
            >computer screens
            Of course the screens on a computer will be computer generated. It wouldn't make sense to make practical fake computer effects.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              >Nobody means this when talking about CGI
              Except it's the fricking definition of CGI: Computer Generated Imagery

              There's plenty of examples of CGI being overused or looking like garbage, sure. There's also plenty of examples of practical effects looking like garbage. CGI is no more inherently "bad" than practical effects - it's a tool that can be used correctly or incorrectly.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day

  10. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    CGI is unironically better in every single aspect

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      If you enjoy shit.

  11. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    "muh practical effects' boomers will defend the oppheimer nuke scene lmao. Get a grip old ass men

  12. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B, because that will also eliminate the Indian CGI farms and put the tools back into competent hands

  13. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    If you don't pick A you are moronic.

  14. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B, obviously.

  15. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B. CGI isn't inherently bad, it's only bad now because studios are contracting like 15 different VFX studios to do shit, of which maybe 2 are competent.

  16. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    If you pick A without picking B, a lot of practical effects put together by DEI hires will result in a lot of dead actors and directors and on-set-producers

    ...I change my mind, I'm picking A now.

  17. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    cgi is bad because it's given to diversity hires so b

  18. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B obviously. I don't hate CGI really. I just hate bad CGI ... or overuse of it.

  19. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >BTFOs all CGIsloppers single-handedly

  20. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B. CGI gets better, leftist/israelite shit gets worse.

  21. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B

  22. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    100% B

  23. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B. Even bad CGI is better then some shlomo trying to force their views on you.

  24. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    A makes every movie from now on look like complete trash

    Why did you put one option that makes movies worse and one that makes them better? How is this supposed to be a choice for anyone other than turbo-autistic loser philistines?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Practical effects and real sets make movies bad
      Holy frick have a nice day

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Practical effects done by competent people look amazing.

        Keep the DEI shit and you won't have practical effects done by competent people for much longer.

  25. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B even if it didn't end DEI hiring of pajeet VFX farms which it would given the wording of the original choice

  26. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    C everything is made by AI (the actual likely outcome)

  27. 6 days ago
    Anonymous
    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Kek at everyone ignoring this so they can seethe about CG and jakpost

  28. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    A

  29. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B ofc because the root cause of Hollywood's decline is incompetence

  30. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B easy.
    If we just started using all competent straight white guys everything would sort itself out.

  31. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B, the CGI would be looking much better to with B, the practical effects with ESG would look like trash. Imagine all those pajeet coders doing practical effects instead.

  32. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B because the top is a symptom of the bottom and brainlets will say otherwise

  33. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    I can live with A, A just means things will continue to look superimposed and weightless, while B means that there will inevitably be a movie made about the US civil war where there are Black Female Union generals commanding mixed troops against Black Confederate Female generals commanding mixed troops and comically weird scenes with black female senators arguing with black female senators about abolishing slavery and Robert E. Lee will be played by a FtM black actor

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      I think you may have confused the two options.

  34. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B

    A would make films more watchable, but B makes them watchable at all so its no contest

  35. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    No diversity quota.
    Easy enough, the problem will fix itself.
    Shitty CGI will get called shitty CGI with no diversity shield to hide behind.

  36. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B is there any fricking question????????????????

  37. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Practical Effect. no CGI would literally kill all diversity quota bullshit since those people cant create anything for shit.

  38. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    A

  39. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B
    DEI is worse for hollywood than CGI by far

  40. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    How's it even a choice?
    Kill shitskin quota, pedoisraelite automatically becomes unable to outsource its CGI to street-shitting rapists, thus quality reemerges.

  41. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Shill thread. If the majority of people pick A then he reposts it forever as 'proof' that Cinemaphile is leftist. If the majority of people pick B then he reposts it forever as 'proof' that Cinemaphile cares more about culture war than quality movies.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      well that's a dumb conclusion
      I picked B *because* I care about quality movies

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn't matter, the leftoid doesn't accept the premise that movies are shitty because of diversity bullshit.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Well, I'm glad to be on the side of "ebil right wing nazi white supremacists" then.
      Diversity quotas on movies frick up the actors, CGI, casting, directors, everything where DEI is applied.

  42. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    A

  43. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B and hope that CGI improves

  44. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    If I pick B the other one wont be a piece of burning shit.

  45. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    C. Every movie has CGI in every scene but also has the sensibilities of Triumph of Will and Birth of a Nation

  46. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    B hands down, we can work on how cgi is applied

  47. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    b
    CGI has its uses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *