She doesn't look white here. Is it just the lighting? How do they get kids though? Do they just adopt? Doctor Strange did the same thing. Where the Latina teen had lesbian parents but it was never explained how they had her.
How did you get that from my post? Asked for a genuine answer and I gave one. I’m simply stating a fact. Disney is pandering to a fraction of humanity while the majority is laughing at it.
Murderers don't just mince around in front of you as their big threat.
Being annoyed that such a small population is hamfisted into most media for diversity points isn’t the same as being “scared”. By that logic you’re absolutely malding at the fact that people make fun of gays
What the frick is "malding"?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah because we've rightfully worked on deterrents to murdering. Now homosexuals are even more in the open and need correction.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Aren't murders some of the most popular characters in film? Especially on Cinemaphile? How is this different?
And yet, murderers are glorified and even praised in movies and shows. Becoming some of the most popular characters ever.
2 years ago
Anonymous
except it's all entertainment fiction otherwise not endorsed by everyone. you don't take away from
Prime example.
it's ok to eat people and it's not even written so, often making points on how he's actually,albeit charming, a monster, whereas homosexual "inclusion" is trying to do the exact opposite and promote the destructive behaviour.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Users on Cinemaphile quite regularly glorify not just fictional murderers but real mass killers when they align with them """"politically"""" (because Cinemaphile politics is fisher price kids shit)
2 years ago
Anonymous
and you consider Cinemaphile posters moral authority? again, what is your point?
There is nothing destructive about homosexuals, though. It's just two people of the same gender kissing/fricking. There such a small minority, they can't possibly do anything to the human population. I mean...aren't we heading to over 9.8 billion in a couple decades? There's literally no harm being done by a couple of homosexuals fricking.
there's going to be a billion more africans, chinks and indians and they'll contain it. that's completely irrelevant to the population decline in europe or even us, though latter one always thrived on immigration. i really dislike the overpopulation argument because it takes the global scale and applies it to local populaces. to use a hot example it's as stupid as saying there is no issue with waging war because most of the world isn't at war, currently.
2 years ago
Anonymous
So the Cinemaphile posters who cry about blacks and gays in films like in this thread should absolutely be listened to but the same ones who glorify literal mass murders are just an aberration?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't understand you. You're conflating various issues and groups into two boxes and telling me to choose as a gotcha.
2 years ago
Anonymous
There is nothing destructive about homosexuals, though. It's just two people of the same gender kissing/fricking. There such a small minority, they can't possibly do anything to the human population. I mean...aren't we heading to over 9.8 billion in a couple decades? There's literally no harm being done by a couple of homosexuals fricking.
Being annoyed that such a small population is hamfisted into most media for diversity points isn’t the same as being “scared”. By that logic you’re absolutely malding at the fact that people make fun of gays
Because showing gay people kissing in a children's film is obviously an ideologically charged decision while showing a straight couple kissing, while generally unnecessary, is not since it's already the norm.
It's funny how the recent Top Gun threads pointing out the obvious propaganda had Cinemaphile defending (outright denyint at points) that shit in droves. It really does smack of entitlement and massive hypocrisy. And really shows that Cinemaphile standing up for their "convictions" is such bullshit.
You don't think blatant US military propaganda, literal recruitment ads in the pre-screening trailers and recruitment booths set up in the cinema lobby is dangerous levels of propaganda? Are you fricking mental? (That was a rhetorical question)
>build a space plane >put fricking wings on it so it can glide >heat shield is a $10 billion jigsaw puzzle, takes month to restore, has to be done by hand >can't even get into orbit without a major booster assist or plane launch
space shuttle is a huge boondoggle and i can't believe people romanticize it when two of them are tombs.
>build a space plane >put fricking wings on it so it can glide >heat shield is a $10 billion jigsaw puzzle, takes month to restore, has to be done by hand >can't even get into orbit without a major booster assist or plane launch
space shuttle is a huge boondoggle and i can't believe people romanticize it when two of them are tombs.
You guys are idiots, it was the 4th human spaceflight machine ever created, and flew 135 successfully missions for 30 years.
And it was made in 1981
>>40% vehicle failure rate
This is false, it’s not like a car, if it gets back it was a win.
The >1.47% flight failure rate
Is the only rate that matters, and it was great
>build a space plane >put fricking wings on it so it can glide >heat shield is a $10 billion jigsaw puzzle, takes month to restore, has to be done by hand >can't even get into orbit without a major booster assist or plane launch
space shuttle is a huge boondoggle and i can't believe people romanticize it when two of them are tombs.
Every mode of transportation in history has carried with it a chance of catastrophic failure. Or do hundreds of shipwrecks, burned wagons, crashed cars, and downed airplanes not count?
It still blows my mind how buzz is the only white guy in the entire movie. Like how much more blatant does pixar have to be for people to get what’s happening
It's 2022 everything has gays, blacks, feminism or any other leftist garbage. It's like going outside and seeing garbage in the street, you no longer care.
Time dilation hasn't been a thing since Interstellar and a longer time before that. It's because they use shit like warp drives and hyperspace to get around that be3cause it's hard to write a story where everyone around the main character is getting older unless that's the point.
It's vile that they have literal homosexuals in children's media. The only time relationships in kids media matters is if two people are the parents of someone. Now we have to imagine these filthy old dykes fingering each other for no reason, just to get off, some nasty fetish. Is that "kid" even theirs? It's all so tiresome.
>Now we have to imagine these filthy old dykes fingering each other for no reason, just to get off, some nasty fetish.
You literally don't. Same as seeing two parents doesn't mean you have to imagine them fricking.
>Two moms
I have had enough of this fricking shit. Get that homosexual president b***h the FRICK out of the company. This shit isn't a realistic depiction of real life. Two moms will of young children will not be frickable and hot. They will be middle-aged battle axes who never had the sexual market value to compete for what they want so they settled for each other.
>each time the mission failed
If this was helmed by a man then Buzz would have more wins than losses. >Alisha
Would have been a man. It would be EXPECTED. If it was a chick then it would highlight that maybe her and Buzz could have had a future but oops space is magic. And that would have been another dour note on her death. This shit can work if you do it right without FORCING it.
Two things,why do you keep making this thread and why would anyone want the star of the movie to be overshadowed? It's a movie about Buzz Lightyear not whatever character Keke Palmer is voicing. They would just have just called it Star Command and had Buzz in a cameo role.
It was a confusing, baffling premise that I'm surprised was ever greenlit in the first place >You have Buzz Lightyear a fictional action figure and this is the movie of the real "fake" Buzz Lightyear who is a fictional movie within the fictional Toy Story universe that the Buzz Lightyear action figure is based on. It's also going to be done in a style so that Buzz looks like the "real" people in the Toy Story universe.... but he's just a fake movie guy
Maybe for a moron like you this will make the most sense: this would be the movie the people in the Toy Story world get about Buzz. And the Buzz character is just a figure of that movie character.
Buzz Lightyear is very clearly a corny space adventurer like Flash Gordon in the Toy Story movie canon though. Plus, he's a cartoon character. Why is this a "real" movie?
>uzz Lightyear is very clearly a corny space adventurer like Flash Gordon
Yeah dumb shit like that and Star Trek never got theatrical movies.
Dumb frick, nice post.
Buzz gets killed off immediately and the mantle of Buzz Light-year gets taken by the sheboon who is also trans and queer and has a trans kid adopted son who has a trans kid boyfriend (kids are 4 years old).
Honestly these moloch-worshipping sickos won't be happy until buzz light-year is on a spint being rotisseried while a blood orgy of toddlers rages around him as he burns alive. That is the endgame.
If they gave it SOUL
Soul evokes emotions making any movie kino
Movies nowadays are too polished. Directors take it upon themselves to make movies as woke as possible as well as push diversity and homos. When will this stop bros?
entire movie that is only about white man doing badass shit, zero woman, gay or black characters aside form a sexulized love intrest that buzz saves and kisses at the end.
just adapt the cartoon without changing the appearance or nationality of any of the characters. And use one of the weirder villains instead of Zurg too, like that fricking vampire or the nightmare fuel cyborg werewolf.
>sub 10k follower >names the one black actress in the movie while ignoring the rest of the cast
This should be a default false/red flag for virtue signalling.
OP quit shilling yourself. You're demeaning the human race by being this desperate.
It's a CG movie based off the fictional character whose action figure was a lead character in the first major CG film I ever saw in theaters. You can be pissy all you want. He even got a cartoon series.
Who would've guessed going woke for the sake of pandering to minorities in the wake of your studio getting infested & taken over by a bunch of raging third wave feminist hacks fresh out of CalArts whilst ousting one of your core veterans (John Lasseter) over a #MeToo accusation + losing your directors, like Brad Bird, to other studios would result in their output being mostly shit? Almost as if they've been on a continuous decline over the course of a decade or something. Knock on wood.
Why doesn't Disney implement any sort of quality control over what Pixar puts out? They used to be THE gold standard for western 3D animation and now their brand is completely destroyed. Their new movies are of the same quality as the knock-off direct to DVD animated movies that say "From the director who saw Toy Story" on the top of the cover.
Am I crazy, or is the "Decomposing Corpse" section better than "The Decline"? Everything in "The Decline" section is trash aside from Coco and Toy Story 3.
Onward and Soul are alright, and I've heard good things about Luca.
Yup, it's not that simple. Pixar don't really make amazing films anymore, but they range from awful to okay.
The decline started with all those sequels.
Disney already tried it with direct-to-video sequels from later 90s or early 00s. Now they make them theatrical.
I didn't even realized Luca is a Pixar movie when it's so different compared to other Disney/Pixar movie. It's essentially an european movie made by burger animators.
>I've heard good things about Luca.
Luca is alright, i really like it but you would expect it was from another studio, not pixar, also the whole "muh queer analogy" from people killed any interest on me in rewatching it, it was soulles and stupid
>movie was shit >THE ONLY GOOD THING WAS THE Black person >THE Black person NEEDED MORE SCREENTIME >DID I ALREADY MENTION HOW HARD I WORSHIP Black folk!?
Very few of us actually do but we've been overtaken by a relatively small group of people that worship them. Was shocked to learn that people not in America that are exposed to American media think the country is full of Black folk and that they are part of every aspect of our lives. It's not the case but it is the dream these people have. If they aren't already they will be coming for your countries next.
>everyone complaining about it being woke as if another toy story nostalgiabait cash grab isn't already the most embarrassing and awful thing a formerly great but now creatively bankrupt animated studio could do
>Movie starts with MC getting his family's home trashed. >But it's okay because it was for art! >No one ever calls him out on his pretentious bullshit.
People give The Incredibles shit for an objectivist slant but Ratatouille is ten times worse.
cars is the most soulless animated movie of them all >cars already have natural face-like appearance >they ignore that and make the windshield the eyes instead >eyes have no separation and are just fused together
it's like a 4 year old made that design choice
In Cars 3 they unironically go into the backstory of a "black" car who was oppressed by classic racers along with a woman car.
2 years ago
Anonymous
lol. Frick geese.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>goose in the backround going "WHAT THE FUUCK MAAAAN?!!""
ahahaha frick geese
2 years ago
Anonymous
I wish I could do this to a Disney/Pixar employee
2 years ago
Anonymous
You gotta develop that BIG HORSE mindset.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The audio is even better.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>OH, SO YOU'RE APPROCHING ME?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>In Cars 3 they unironically go into the backstory of a "black" car who was oppressed by classic racers along with a woman car.
Did you just make that up?
imagine if they did that with israelites..
cars is the most soulless animated movie of them all >cars already have natural face-like appearance >they ignore that and make the windshield the eyes instead >eyes have no separation and are just fused together
it's like a 4 year old made that design choice
this is so true. thought it the moment I first saw pictures from that movie
Frick off. People irrationally hate on Cars 1 because Cars 2 is so bad. Or they are pure autism and hate it because of the eyeball placement.
Cars 2 had a mutant freak car with headlight eyeballs and it looked creepy just as the dvd commentary stated it would
You are fricking moronic. Making the lamps the eyes causes serious problems:
>Smaller surface = less surface to show eye movements, the mouth and eyes are the only body language in the movie. >Night scenes where they switch on headlamps = basically unworkable if eyes are the headlamps >What the frick are you going to show in the windshield/car interior if the headlamps are eyes. An opaque black surface? An empty car interior?
Stick to shitposting on Cinemaphile instead of backseat animating.
>Night scenes where they switch on headlamps = basically unworkable if eyes are the headlamps
just make the eyes light up, totally workable
the real problem is a driverless moving car is inherently scary, ie not good for a kids film and looks moronic to boot so you hide the seats
Pixar is too much of a meme now. After Up and Toy Story 3, the idea that they make "emotional" films got to their heads.
Their early films were all just very simple premises like "fish", but done with a high level of competency.
Is it? A sad Buzz Lightyear movie, mad for the Neill Degrass Tyson space porn crowd, and people nostalgic for the 90's?
It's a children's movie for adults. Minions is a children's movie.
>Black person side kick that shows up Buzz >Still not enough for sjws >"Keke never got a chance to shine! She should have been the main protagonist. Instead shes just a tool to help Buzz complete HIS adventure"
The Black person is named Keke? The Black person being referred to as a tool?
Gotta keep that Toy Story IP going, but even they must know TS5 is a step too far. Plus, I think Tim Allen isn't such a popular figure these days.
You know, if you've got to do this, then Woody's Roundup would probably make a better movie. We already have the extended cast of Jesse, Bullseye and the Prospector, and a Western thing has potential. Space feels done at this point. Wall E was already a space movie. Incredibles already did all of the high science stuff.
>there's a timeline where Pixar still has soul and wasn't a company of satanic pedophiles where this Buzz movie would be utter kino and we get a quick Pixar short as per usual at the beginning and it's an episode of Woody's Roundup
WAYYYYYYYY to much soul for this Hell on Earth trans kids timeline, but can you imagine?
We've already covered this. Modern Pixar is barely for kids. It's for people who were kids 20 years ago.
Plus, I should be allowed to critique a kids' movie, because it's still a movie, and it can still have worth if it's made well.
Another bad/mediocre Pixar movie. People always overrated them anyway. Their old movies are fine children flicks, but nothing more than that. I never understood the love for Toy Story.
On the other hand I thought Interstellar was one of the best fricking films ever made. The whole Miller's planet sequence blows my fricking mind every time.
What's great about this too is that absolutely fricking NO ONE asked for a movie about the fricking lore of the person who a toy was based on in a completely different franchise this studio has.
i don't think i know a single person who actually has this movie on their list of shit to go see. Millenials liked toy story, not "the shit toys were based on, the movie". Toy story reminds them of when they were kids. Toy Story isn't even a zoomer franchise since they never rebooted it properly. This doesn't make any fricking sense to anyone.
>this was Pixar’s chance to go bold
What would be bold would be for Disney to make a film or series with a white lead character that doesn’t have a black female sidekick
They did that just 10 years ago with Tangled and Frozen. Nothing bold about that. You know what would be bold? A dark 2D animated Disney movie, like the ones they made in pre-renaissance era.
Everything I loved in the 90s and early 00s is shit today. I don't think a single franchise from that era wasn't completely ruined.
And it's not just Western entertainment. Same thing happened to Japanese stuff.
>a soulless spinoff from their other property they had already milked completely fricking dry >"chance to go bold"
unironically how, just because it had sci-fi that isn't entirely goofy cutesy shit?
Pixar just sucks ass now and it feels reflective of the current Hollywood. Reboots, remasters, and sequels. And what new IPs we do get are incredibly safe and inoffensive.
You could argue with the semantics of "recent memory" but no movie will ever be fricking safer than brave. Villain barely existed, hardly call it a villain more than an obstacle. It is a fricking "girl wants more than a girly lifestyle, don't wanna get married to an assigned man." The witch character was the only interesting character and just disappeared for the rest of the movie. The plot revolves around brother bear's stolen plot. Protagonist changes all of the hearts and minds of all of the clans that have been ingrained into them for hundreds of years with a short speech.
Let me guess. Title character takes a backseat to new diverse cast of characters. The new characters are boring because writers want to show that everyone is the same
Woody was my favourite character when I was a kid, so I would prefer "Woody's Roundup" film. Still, though, that seems like a monkey paw wish in today's climate.
But hey, they get to show kids two women kissing, which was the entire point.
I thought that was intended for me.
based
let me guess, it happens in the background so it's more convienient for the china edit.
Frick off nazi
Are these chinese bots?
frick off nazi
动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Sneed 六四天安門事件 重複的號碼 The Sneed Ban of 2019 天安門大屠殺 The Simpsons General Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Janny Struggle 大躍進政策 Comfy Simpsons Thread 文化大革命 The Great Sneedposter Cultural Revolution 人權 Off-topic garbage 民運 Gucci Loafers 自由 Sneedom 獨立 S11E5 多黨制 7-8 max 台灣 臺灣 Formerly Chuck's 中華民國 Cinemaphile - Television & Film 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Gummy Bears 達賴喇嘛 Farmer #1 法輪功 Farmer #2 新疆維吾爾自治區 He does it for free 諾貝爾和平獎 劉暁波 City slicker 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 SNEED 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 ALL-FIELDS 劉曉波动态网自由门
ching chong ping pong
daddy xi no longer allows disney degeneracy in his home
Lmao
Kek
mmm.....interesting
>interracial gay couple
every fricking time
She doesn't look white here. Is it just the lighting? How do they get kids though? Do they just adopt? Doctor Strange did the same thing. Where the Latina teen had lesbian parents but it was never explained how they had her.
How's that different from kids seeing a man and woman kissing? Genuine question and I fricking EXPECT a genuine answer.
depopulation conditioning
Which is good. We're already overcrowded as frick.
>we
as far as I know it's hard to get residency in israel
Kissing doesn't belong in any media unless is a romance
Agreed, no kissing, no violence,no sex,no nudity, no nationalism, no foul language. None of these belong in films.
This but unironically
Homosexuality is a mental illness
There is no difference. It's just insecure incel homophobes that fear getting raped by men.
Heterosexuality = the thing propelling humanity
Homosexuality/transgenderism = genetic dead ends and 1% of the population
Most kids make fun of stuff like gay people on the playground
Imagine being so triggered about a tiny, tiny fraction of the population.
>Triggered
How did you get that from my post? Asked for a genuine answer and I gave one. I’m simply stating a fact. Disney is pandering to a fraction of humanity while the majority is laughing at it.
>1% of the population
>100% rent free
Gay people scare the shit out of people like this.
I know. It's so hilarious.
>Samegayging yourself
Pathetic honestly. You use the word triggered but you’re having a meltdown rn
>Everyone who disagrees with me is the same!!!
Like clockwork.
>Everyone who dislikes me is scared!
Delusional
>Triggered by gay people in movies/shows
>"im not scared yoo delusional homosexual!!"
Keep going. You amuse me so.
You keep saying triggered but that’s not what was implied by what was stating. You’re clearly gay and triggered that people think you’re a joke.
Cry moar as more and more of "teh evil gays" get shoved in your faces.
I'll be laughing at your seethe lol
Yes, homosexuality IS evil and it’s being shoved in our faces. You get it now
>States fact
>L…look! They’re s…so scared!!
Again, simply stating facts
I don't get it, murderers are also a fraction of populace and they scare people, what are you trying to prove?
Murderers don't just mince around in front of you as their big threat.
What the frick is "malding"?
Yeah because we've rightfully worked on deterrents to murdering. Now homosexuals are even more in the open and need correction.
Aren't murders some of the most popular characters in film? Especially on Cinemaphile? How is this different?
And yet, murderers are glorified and even praised in movies and shows. Becoming some of the most popular characters ever.
except it's all entertainment fiction otherwise not endorsed by everyone. you don't take away from
it's ok to eat people and it's not even written so, often making points on how he's actually,albeit charming, a monster, whereas homosexual "inclusion" is trying to do the exact opposite and promote the destructive behaviour.
Users on Cinemaphile quite regularly glorify not just fictional murderers but real mass killers when they align with them """"politically"""" (because Cinemaphile politics is fisher price kids shit)
and you consider Cinemaphile posters moral authority? again, what is your point?
there's going to be a billion more africans, chinks and indians and they'll contain it. that's completely irrelevant to the population decline in europe or even us, though latter one always thrived on immigration. i really dislike the overpopulation argument because it takes the global scale and applies it to local populaces. to use a hot example it's as stupid as saying there is no issue with waging war because most of the world isn't at war, currently.
So the Cinemaphile posters who cry about blacks and gays in films like in this thread should absolutely be listened to but the same ones who glorify literal mass murders are just an aberration?
I don't understand you. You're conflating various issues and groups into two boxes and telling me to choose as a gotcha.
There is nothing destructive about homosexuals, though. It's just two people of the same gender kissing/fricking. There such a small minority, they can't possibly do anything to the human population. I mean...aren't we heading to over 9.8 billion in a couple decades? There's literally no harm being done by a couple of homosexuals fricking.
Being annoyed that such a small population is hamfisted into most media for diversity points isn’t the same as being “scared”. By that logic you’re absolutely malding at the fact that people make fun of gays
It's not, but these chuds won't ever get that
Because showing gay people kissing in a children's film is obviously an ideologically charged decision while showing a straight couple kissing, while generally unnecessary, is not since it's already the norm.
It's funny how the recent Top Gun threads pointing out the obvious propaganda had Cinemaphile defending (outright denyint at points) that shit in droves. It really does smack of entitlement and massive hypocrisy. And really shows that Cinemaphile standing up for their "convictions" is such bullshit.
Top Gun isn't a movie for kids.
You don't think blatant US military propaganda, literal recruitment ads in the pre-screening trailers and recruitment booths set up in the cinema lobby is dangerous levels of propaganda? Are you fricking mental? (That was a rhetorical question)
>and I fricking EXPECT a genuine answer
have a nice day homosexual, you're not entitled to shit
You'll get on your knees and fricking GIVE IT TO ME you little shit.
men and women are normal and healthy. homosexuals are degenerate and harmful to children.
>Women
>"Normal and healthy"
Kek
yes homosexual.
Lesbians unironically are fine it's the gays we should be worried about
one is the product of love and survival of mankind. The other is homosexual shit.
film nobody asked for, filled with woke messages. hope it crashes and burns
like the challenger?
Challenger barely left the pad. This will be like Columbi.
frick the death trap that is the shuttle btw
>build a space plane
>put fricking wings on it so it can glide
>heat shield is a $10 billion jigsaw puzzle, takes month to restore, has to be done by hand
>can't even get into orbit without a major booster assist or plane launch
space shuttle is a huge boondoggle and i can't believe people romanticize it when two of them are tombs.
gen x had shuttles boomers had the saturn v
alright you design a better one with the knowledge available at the time then
>Lock the doors
Was it tension kino?
I romanticise how fricking cool it would be to break up on reentry
would have just been spent on palestinian sodomizer bombs otherwise
You guys are idiots, it was the 4th human spaceflight machine ever created, and flew 135 successfully missions for 30 years.
And it was made in 1981
>40% vehicle failure rate
>1.5% flight failure rate
that's abysmal
>>40% vehicle failure rate
This is false, it’s not like a car, if it gets back it was a win.
The
>1.47% flight failure rate
Is the only rate that matters, and it was great
Every mode of transportation in history has carried with it a chance of catastrophic failure. Or do hundreds of shipwrecks, burned wagons, crashed cars, and downed airplanes not count?
>it wasn't subversive enough for me to like it
How the frick is someone, even cucked, 'surprised' to discover that this one is shit?
It still blows my mind how buzz is the only white guy in the entire movie. Like how much more blatant does pixar have to be for people to get what’s happening
never seen that one before
This is literally the Forever War, right down to the protagonist coming home and finding everyone is now gay and mixed race.
Kek
fricking hell you're right
God, I hated that book.
Nice Gunbuster rip-off
Gunbuster's so fricking good
>but he stayed the same age
alright alright alright
Presidential slogan 2024. Mark me.
That's pretty sad
You're a homosexual and a cuck
so Buzz is a huge frickup and is shit as his job
...so, it's literally just an Interstellar + Gunbuster rip off? Lame.
>Gunbuster rip off
fricking moronic weeb
>rip off
this is how I know you are a fool.
I like time dilations stories.
might be ok. I think I will enjoy it more than Red.
Oh I bet there will be dilation involved
Is this Lightyear or Interstellar?
THIS IS THE FRICKING PLOT TO FRICKING INTERSTELLAR WP:RIKHMO:CANEWTHGRLIEPAKC<MUI:HPOEBTM!!!!!!!!
i didnt think they could shit them selves harder then TS4 or Brave but HOLY SHIT. When Lasseter got the boot, the rot accelerated.
Why is no one talking about the lesbos?
It's 2022 everything has gays, blacks, feminism or any other leftist garbage. It's like going outside and seeing garbage in the street, you no longer care.
LESBIANS, IN MY SHOW
PROGRESSIVISM OUT OF CONTROL
this but unironically
>two moms
So now they're ripping off Interstellar?
forever war 1974
Lol. They're doing that story(which wasn't even original in Interstellar)? Total hacks.
this is what they mean when they say "pozzed"
The cartoon from the 2000s was better than this
They're ripping off pushing the speed of light? Pathetic https://youtu.be/ud6LiVJkwyA
Time dilation hasn't been a thing since Interstellar and a longer time before that. It's because they use shit like warp drives and hyperspace to get around that be3cause it's hard to write a story where everyone around the main character is getting older unless that's the point.
It's vile that they have literal homosexuals in children's media. The only time relationships in kids media matters is if two people are the parents of someone. Now we have to imagine these filthy old dykes fingering each other for no reason, just to get off, some nasty fetish. Is that "kid" even theirs? It's all so tiresome.
>Now we have to imagine these filthy old dykes fingering each other for no reason, just to get off, some nasty fetish.
You literally don't. Same as seeing two parents doesn't mean you have to imagine them fricking.
>Two moms
I have had enough of this fricking shit. Get that homosexual president b***h the FRICK out of the company. This shit isn't a realistic depiction of real life. Two moms will of young children will not be frickable and hot. They will be middle-aged battle axes who never had the sexual market value to compete for what they want so they settled for each other.
>each time the mission failed
If this was helmed by a man then Buzz would have more wins than losses.
>Alisha
Would have been a man. It would be EXPECTED. If it was a chick then it would highlight that maybe her and Buzz could have had a future but oops space is magic. And that would have been another dour note on her death. This shit can work if you do it right without FORCING it.
So didn’t someone on Cinemaphile leak this ending a while ago
So it's just Gunbuster but woke?
>all the culturally illiterate weebs citing trannime as what it’s ripping off instead of the forever war
Japanese site. Cry more. Ywnbaw.
forever war was literally the second reply, what are you even mad about?
Is that the Vic Viper?
If nothing else, at least Disney has good taste in space ships.
Interstellar 2: Pixar boogaloo
Interstellar for kids
This is pretty close to that Queen song that Brian May wrote and no one remembers.
I lot of people know this song, from my experiences anyways
Why would he be experiencing time dilation? is he traveling near a black hole or something? traveling at light-speed?
Two things,why do you keep making this thread and why would anyone want the star of the movie to be overshadowed? It's a movie about Buzz Lightyear not whatever character Keke Palmer is voicing. They would just have just called it Star Command and had Buzz in a cameo role.
Because kids want to see Buzz. Disney is just enticing kids into the van before molesting them
>Doesn’t have Tim Allen as Buzz
>Not even Patrick Warburton like in the cartoon
Damn who would habe thought.
Didn't go woke enough?
It was a confusing, baffling premise that I'm surprised was ever greenlit in the first place
>You have Buzz Lightyear a fictional action figure and this is the movie of the real "fake" Buzz Lightyear who is a fictional movie within the fictional Toy Story universe that the Buzz Lightyear action figure is based on. It's also going to be done in a style so that Buzz looks like the "real" people in the Toy Story universe.... but he's just a fake movie guy
Yes, why is that so hard for you to wrap your head around, you b***h about it every thread.
Maybe for a moron like you this will make the most sense: this would be the movie the people in the Toy Story world get about Buzz. And the Buzz character is just a figure of that movie character.
Buzz Lightyear is very clearly a corny space adventurer like Flash Gordon in the Toy Story movie canon though. Plus, he's a cartoon character. Why is this a "real" movie?
People like Toy Story. It's a cash grab. They included Buzz here because if it was about a new character it could flop.
This. I always thought of Buzz Lightyear as some mass produced GI Joe/Transformers toy parody
>uzz Lightyear is very clearly a corny space adventurer like Flash Gordon
Yeah dumb shit like that and Star Trek never got theatrical movies.
Dumb frick, nice post.
That's not the point though. Why is it a sad astronaut movie, ripping off Interstellar? Why is it not like the actual Flash Gordon movie?
Well yeah, because they're hacks. But rhetorically.
Fool, reading comprehension.
I was speaking conceptually. I wasn't saying this actual woke product would be the movie they'd get in toy story world.
Why are you mad at me if you're agreeing with me? Go to bed.
READING COMPREHENSION.
I WASN'T AGREEING WITH YOU, THAT WASNT THE POINT OF MY POST.
US HAPPENING TO AGREE ON THE THING IS IRRELEVANT.
I don't know what you trying to say, mane
No shit.
Well, articulate yourself or calm down, buddy. No one wants your grumpy dumpies.
Except Buzz from this movie is clearly not the same Buzz as the one from Toy Story.
How does that pertain to the post you replied to.
Gee i Wonder why you fricking moron
Buzz Light-year = Luke Skywalker
Zurg = Vader
Was this not obvious from the trailer? It should’ve been like Flash Gordon or old Star Wars
Or like, the cartoon that was mildly successful. I can’t see how this Buzz would have a successful action figure based off him
What she really means is why isn't the movie about buzz lightyear actually about the black woman
>Pixar's chance to go bold
Weren't Soul, Luca, and Turning Red them going bold?
dubs
What would a bold and unsafe movie be like?
Curious too. More blacks, gays and trannies I’m guessing
gays assfricking on screen and showing kids their aids and pox infested holes
The Northman. Too many normalgays being conditioned to expect Marvel and Disney swill. I hope Star Wars and capeshit die
>The Northman.
>bold and unsafe
>2022
>The Northman.
>timid and safe
Yes
Yes
>heckin all white cast
The absolute state of /misc/gays
>/pol/gays
I've never paid you rent so why am I still living inside your head?
The fight choreography in northman was worse than capeshit Eggers is inept
Buzz gets killed off immediately and the mantle of Buzz Light-year gets taken by the sheboon who is also trans and queer and has a trans kid adopted son who has a trans kid boyfriend (kids are 4 years old).
Honestly these moloch-worshipping sickos won't be happy until buzz light-year is on a spint being rotisseried while a blood orgy of toddlers rages around him as he burns alive. That is the endgame.
Toy Story 1
If they gave it SOUL
Soul evokes emotions making any movie kino
Movies nowadays are too polished. Directors take it upon themselves to make movies as woke as possible as well as push diversity and homos. When will this stop bros?
Yeah, Soul was kino.
Twitter zoomer.
any sci-fi without Black folk
Any movie/show without Black folk.
entire movie that is only about white man doing badass shit, zero woman, gay or black characters aside form a sexulized love intrest that buzz saves and kisses at the end.
just adapt the cartoon without changing the appearance or nationality of any of the characters. And use one of the weirder villains instead of Zurg too, like that fricking vampire or the nightmare fuel cyborg werewolf.
>sub 10k follower
>names the one black actress in the movie while ignoring the rest of the cast
This should be a default false/red flag for virtue signalling.
OP quit shilling yourself. You're demeaning the human race by being this desperate.
I just rolled my eyes when I saw the billboards in Hollywood. Blatantly desperate grab for nostalgiabux. Nobody wanted this shit.
It's a CG movie based off the fictional character whose action figure was a lead character in the first major CG film I ever saw in theaters. You can be pissy all you want. He even got a cartoon series.
wew lad
>Ehrlich
Yikers broham! Sounds like this movie LOST THE GAME!
roasted
holy moly
i expected it to be subpar but wow
ehrlich my balls homosexual
ehrlich means honest in german
Who would've guessed going woke for the sake of pandering to minorities in the wake of your studio getting infested & taken over by a bunch of raging third wave feminist hacks fresh out of CalArts whilst ousting one of your core veterans (John Lasseter) over a #MeToo accusation + losing your directors, like Brad Bird, to other studios would result in their output being mostly shit? Almost as if they've been on a continuous decline over the course of a decade or something. Knock on wood.
lmao at lasseter getting metoo'd over asking girls for hugs.
We all know how it is!
I haven’t watched the last 3. Are any worth it?
Luca's okay.
It was the first one to overtly shift to the "3D Calarts' style though.
Besides that. It's fine.
Soul is great
Luca is okay
Turning Red is....polarizing
soul is not great, its mediocre at best
Why doesn't Disney implement any sort of quality control over what Pixar puts out? They used to be THE gold standard for western 3D animation and now their brand is completely destroyed. Their new movies are of the same quality as the knock-off direct to DVD animated movies that say "From the director who saw Toy Story" on the top of the cover.
Am I crazy, or is the "Decomposing Corpse" section better than "The Decline"? Everything in "The Decline" section is trash aside from Coco and Toy Story 3.
Onward and Soul are alright, and I've heard good things about Luca.
Yup, it's not that simple. Pixar don't really make amazing films anymore, but they range from awful to okay.
The decline started with all those sequels.
Disney already tried it with direct-to-video sequels from later 90s or early 00s. Now they make them theatrical.
Yeah, "pixar bad" is basically a meme.
The sequels are shitty of course, but Coco and Luca are on par with older movies.
I didn't even realized Luca is a Pixar movie when it's so different compared to other Disney/Pixar movie. It's essentially an european movie made by burger animators.
>I've heard good things about Luca.
Luca is alright, i really like it but you would expect it was from another studio, not pixar, also the whole "muh queer analogy" from people killed any interest on me in rewatching it, it was soulles and stupid
Move Incredibles 2 down to Decomposing Corpse.
Inside Out and Coco are good
Soul + Onward are way better than Dinosaurr or Incredibles 2
Soul is the only genuinely good movie after Inside Out.
>movie was shit
>THE ONLY GOOD THING WAS THE Black person
>THE Black person NEEDED MORE SCREENTIME
>DID I ALREADY MENTION HOW HARD I WORSHIP Black folk!?
This. Americans suffer from compulsive Black person worship.
Very few of us actually do but we've been overtaken by a relatively small group of people that worship them. Was shocked to learn that people not in America that are exposed to American media think the country is full of Black folk and that they are part of every aspect of our lives. It's not the case but it is the dream these people have. If they aren't already they will be coming for your countries next.
So it's actually good?
Predict the RT score.
99% because of the black people.
Verified will be likely similar due to shill reviews + bots.
>everyone complaining about it being woke as if another toy story nostalgiabait cash grab isn't already the most embarrassing and awful thing a formerly great but now creatively bankrupt animated studio could do
They stuffed it full of nogs so if anyone criticizes this cheap IP exploitation they can call them racist.
Being bold nowadays means if they actually produced it like it was the time before diversity quotas.
They're cartoon characters though, not actually black people.
Why is anyone surprised, the teaser trailer was the world's most generic teaser
Pixar hasn't made a good movie since Cars 1
Ratatouille was good
Do I have to get into detail about rat piss? That movie sceeves me out, it sucks.
>Movie starts with MC getting his family's home trashed.
>But it's okay because it was for art!
>No one ever calls him out on his pretentious bullshit.
People give The Incredibles shit for an objectivist slant but Ratatouille is ten times worse.
Cars = shit
cars is the most soulless animated movie of them all
>cars already have natural face-like appearance
>they ignore that and make the windshield the eyes instead
>eyes have no separation and are just fused together
it's like a 4 year old made that design choice
Cars is a charming, comfy and compelling animation classic
NO
CARS IS A MOVIE ABOUT EUGENICS AND JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
AND IF YOU DON'T SEE IT YOU ARE LITERALLY A FASCIST
>EUGENICS
how
How do they give birth
why do they need sidewalks
Do you think Cars version of Africa is named Traffica?
...do they have their own version of israel?
Israwheel.
kek
In Cars 3 they unironically go into the backstory of a "black" car who was oppressed by classic racers along with a woman car.
lol. Frick geese.
>goose in the backround going "WHAT THE FUUCK MAAAAN?!!""
ahahaha frick geese
I wish I could do this to a Disney/Pixar employee
You gotta develop that BIG HORSE mindset.
The audio is even better.
>OH, SO YOU'RE APPROCHING ME?
>In Cars 3 they unironically go into the backstory of a "black" car who was oppressed by classic racers along with a woman car.
Did you just make that up?
imagine if they did that with israelites..
>you see out of the headlights
the car, not the driver does
this is so true. thought it the moment I first saw pictures from that movie
>movie is about the destruction of the American lifestyle
>anon focuses on the face
every time
Frick off. People irrationally hate on Cars 1 because Cars 2 is so bad. Or they are pure autism and hate it because of the eyeball placement.
Cars 2 had a mutant freak car with headlight eyeballs and it looked creepy just as the dvd commentary stated it would
I think she was the cutest car in the trilogy though. 🙁
You are fricking moronic. Making the lamps the eyes causes serious problems:
>Smaller surface = less surface to show eye movements, the mouth and eyes are the only body language in the movie.
>Night scenes where they switch on headlamps = basically unworkable if eyes are the headlamps
>What the frick are you going to show in the windshield/car interior if the headlamps are eyes. An opaque black surface? An empty car interior?
Stick to shitposting on Cinemaphile instead of backseat animating.
>Night scenes where they switch on headlamps = basically unworkable if eyes are the headlamps
just make the eyes light up, totally workable
the real problem is a driverless moving car is inherently scary, ie not good for a kids film and looks moronic to boot so you hide the seats
>keke
Didn't even realize this one was being done by pixar, have they done anything of note in like 10 years?
No Warp Darkmatter, no watch.
We already know Zorg is Lightyear's father
Pixar is too much of a meme now. After Up and Toy Story 3, the idea that they make "emotional" films got to their heads.
Their early films were all just very simple premises like "fish", but done with a high level of competency.
It's a cartoon movie for children.
Is it? A sad Buzz Lightyear movie, mad for the Neill Degrass Tyson space porn crowd, and people nostalgic for the 90's?
It's a children's movie for adults. Minions is a children's movie.
Children watch tiktok fortnite videos, these movies are all being made for nostalgic 30 year olds.
Its just a boring revenge story
>they didn't push the Black person enough
All films will be judged on this standard
>movie about buzz lightyear
>literally who twittergay starts talking about keke palmer
these people have brainrot
>keke palmer barely gets a chance to shine
I hate these kinds of people, they're up in all the letterboxd reviews too
>Black person side kick that shows up Buzz
>Still not enough for sjws
>"Keke never got a chance to shine! She should have been the main protagonist. Instead shes just a tool to help Buzz complete HIS adventure"
The Black person is named Keke? The Black person being referred to as a tool?
Top keke, as they say
>"Keke never got a chance to shine! She should have been the main protagonist. Instead shes just a tool to help Buzz complete HIS adventure"
The adventure of becoming a cotton producer in a future world!
>make a spinoff movie of a Toy Story toy character
>he's now a real human astronaut in the far future
Just who comes up with this shit
Gotta keep that Toy Story IP going, but even they must know TS5 is a step too far. Plus, I think Tim Allen isn't such a popular figure these days.
You know, if you've got to do this, then Woody's Roundup would probably make a better movie. We already have the extended cast of Jesse, Bullseye and the Prospector, and a Western thing has potential. Space feels done at this point. Wall E was already a space movie. Incredibles already did all of the high science stuff.
Doesn't Buzz get fricked in the ass like Castlevania in this? What more do these freaks want.
I don't even know if that's a joke. Is Buzz gay? It wouldn't surprise me.
>why wasn't this childrens movie challenging for me, an adult male
gee, i wonder why dude
IT'S MA'AM
>there's a timeline where Pixar still has soul and wasn't a company of satanic pedophiles where this Buzz movie would be utter kino and we get a quick Pixar short as per usual at the beginning and it's an episode of Woody's Roundup
WAYYYYYYYY to much soul for this Hell on Earth trans kids timeline, but can you imagine?
>Woody's roundup cartoon
>They actually make that sugar chocolate cereal from Toy Story 2 and put it in theaters
That'd be cool-as shit
You’re all adult males obsessing over Pixar movies meant for toddelers and preteens.
We've already covered this. Modern Pixar is barely for kids. It's for people who were kids 20 years ago.
Plus, I should be allowed to critique a kids' movie, because it's still a movie, and it can still have worth if it's made well.
Another bad/mediocre Pixar movie. People always overrated them anyway. Their old movies are fine children flicks, but nothing more than that. I never understood the love for Toy Story.
Why is it so hard to get a good spacekino?
Interstellar was good but didn't quite live up to the potential it had. Maybe based Cruise will deliver in a couple years.
On the other hand I thought Interstellar was one of the best fricking films ever made. The whole Miller's planet sequence blows my fricking mind every time.
>Keke Palmer barely gets a chance to shine
homie it's not her fricking movie.
>Keke Palmer
.......... "...x infinity" ............ WHOOOO????????????? WHERE'S BUZZ????????
What's great about this too is that absolutely fricking NO ONE asked for a movie about the fricking lore of the person who a toy was based on in a completely different franchise this studio has.
i don't think i know a single person who actually has this movie on their list of shit to go see. Millenials liked toy story, not "the shit toys were based on, the movie". Toy story reminds them of when they were kids. Toy Story isn't even a zoomer franchise since they never rebooted it properly. This doesn't make any fricking sense to anyone.
It doesn't even make sense because the Toy Story Buzz was a galactic ranger or something, this one is just some boring astronaut from real life Earth.
why did they even bother?
By the book of Black folk.
It couldn't really be worse than The Good Dinosaur, could it?
More like Aaron gaygle
>this was Pixar’s chance to go bold
What would be bold would be for Disney to make a film or series with a white lead character that doesn’t have a black female sidekick
They did that just 10 years ago with Tangled and Frozen. Nothing bold about that. You know what would be bold? A dark 2D animated Disney movie, like the ones they made in pre-renaissance era.
If they made a legit movie for adults like Fantasia, that'd be pretty bold.
>muh woke shit
You people are as braindead as the libtard consumers.
>you WILL listen to racially biased political attacks against your people
>you WILL support and advocate for trans kids
>you W--
nope eat lead pedo
>shoots up school
Ok bud
"bud" is a weird way of spelling CIA
at least I'm not advocating for the castration of children
Man even Pixar is shit these days, so depressing
Everything I loved in the 90s and early 00s is shit today. I don't think a single franchise from that era wasn't completely ruined.
And it's not just Western entertainment. Same thing happened to Japanese stuff.
>a soulless spinoff from their other property they had already milked completely fricking dry
>"chance to go bold"
unironically how, just because it had sci-fi that isn't entirely goofy cutesy shit?
Pixar just sucks ass now and it feels reflective of the current Hollywood. Reboots, remasters, and sequels. And what new IPs we do get are incredibly safe and inoffensive.
>Safest movie of recent memory
That's literally every Pixar/Disney movie tho. How are these people only realizing now that they have a system?
Oh shit, that makes it sound like it isn't as israelited as I'd assumed it would be. Might go and watch it now.
Buzz Lightskin
You could argue with the semantics of "recent memory" but no movie will ever be fricking safer than brave. Villain barely existed, hardly call it a villain more than an obstacle. It is a fricking "girl wants more than a girly lifestyle, don't wanna get married to an assigned man." The witch character was the only interesting character and just disappeared for the rest of the movie. The plot revolves around brother bear's stolen plot. Protagonist changes all of the hearts and minds of all of the clans that have been ingrained into them for hundreds of years with a short speech.
Frick Brave. I'd rather watch Cars 2
Pixar peaked with WALL-E.
>surprised to discover diversity film was safe and inoffensive
>soulless nostalgia bait released in the era of soulless cash-grabs is soulless
Color me shocked
But Top Gun Maverick is great?
That's the exception, not the rule.
Also expect Hollywood to learn nothing from that movie.
pixar havent made a good film in ages
Hey frick you you fricking c**t
Why wasn't the black astronaut the main character?
Pixar turned into shit after Disney fired Lasseter.
Pixar turned to shit long before that.
>white male protagonist
I could have told you this when the fricking title was announced. Cookie cutter by the numbers 2000s shit
wait a minute, a toy story doesn't have a nuanced villain? color me surprised
>keke
Why do Black folk name their kids like this?
Let me guess. Title character takes a backseat to new diverse cast of characters. The new characters are boring because writers want to show that everyone is the same
Pixar been over after onward
>corporation
>going bold
Yeah...
Woody was my favourite character when I was a kid, so I would prefer "Woody's Roundup" film. Still, though, that seems like a monkey paw wish in today's climate.
Is this not just complaining that they focused on the white male
Good. Half of them were hacks from the start anyway. The man to the left of Lasseter is a deranged psychopath.
I heard there's an anal gay sex scene in the middle? How is that safe?