Pure educational kino

Pure educational kino

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    based

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      *subtly defends the confederacy*

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nothing subtle about it. Get fricked yankee fascist.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Seethe and dilate more, Democrat. Enjoy your Black person infested southern cities and crime rates. Love, from a proud yankee.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Black person infested southern cities and crime rates
            I guess you've never heard of Chicago, Detroit, Flint, NYC, Philadelphia, Minneapolis, etc. despite being a "proud yankee." Now instead of the blacks being contained in the South, they're your problem now because your moronic ancestors decided to kill 700k white men to set them free.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >narrates a completely bullshit and unsourced anecdote that seems so good you want to believe it
        He does it for both sides though, so it doesn't really matter
        >So, Forrest had taken five bullets, and he was thrown off his horse, and he teleported behind a yank, used his body as a shield, then jumped on an another horse while still carrying the corpse, which stopped bullets. He was bayoneted and shot again and thrown off another horse, but he managed to break his fall and take yet another horse. He was said to have whispered "psssh, nothing personel kid" to the soldier he had used as a shield, and huh, that was the last shot fired at the battle of Shiloh
        Lie to me daddy, I unironically fricking love this shit
        I never found the soldier's journal whose last entry read "I was killed" but I fricking wish it existed

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, just like January 6th conservatards just can't stop defending losers insurrectionist.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      *tells offbeat humorous anecdote, then awkwardly changes subject when cameraman does not laugh*

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My favorite part.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Europa Last Battle

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Which side made the blanket fort and which side made the pillow fort?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ric > Ken

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is this the one where Ashoka Farewell plays almost on a loop throughout the entire movie? I love that song.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hell yeah

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      goat

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Used to take naps to this shit, so fricking kino waking up to

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    are americans allowed to be educated by this anymore? it makes no apologies about showing the vallantry and humanity of ((both sides)), and that in spite of the brutal suffering we inflict on each other that we're all children of god, cast into causes and moulded by designs out of our control.

    it's not very current year.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I doubt it would ever been shown in schools (or that it ever was), but there's nothing blocking us from watching it if that's what you are asking. it was on Netflix a couple years ago when I watched it, so it's not very hard to find either

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it really seems like it should be shown in schools. how is the civil war actually taught over there?

        when i grew up in england in the 90s, the first world war was a massive part of your history education despite ww2 being infinitely cooler to the average 11 year old and it was always taught with a very similar delivery to this civil war doc. like an apocalyptic working class folk tale. ww2 was almost cartoonish in its moral simplicity by comparison.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I can't really speak for currently, but growing up in the 90s/2000s in a southern state, we were basically taught about the civil war the same way the documentary presents it

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          In the South our teachers are very open about southern sympathies. Pretty much Yanks are pussies, Southerners are valiant knights defending their homeland from godless invaders and we would have won if we didn’t fight any battles north of the mason Dixon line. Lincoln is respected actually but his successor is hated for “Reconstruction” Planter Class families are still around and descendants of these men are still around… This was in the mid/late 2010s

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're thinking too hard

      It's not accepted in the current year because it was made by a white male.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      we watched this in at my high school, but it was 20 years ago and this a town that was a major battle site for the war in the South, so i don't know about today

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not really.

      The Civil War has been so dumbed down that your average person unironically belives "And one day, just because they loved slavery so much, the South decided to secede." There's no talk at all about the near century of buildup to the war and absolutely no discussion about Congressional mismangement and shortsightedness being integral to the deepening divisions in the country during those many years.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the south already forced concession after concession from the northern states in the decades long buildup. things like the 3/5 compromise and the existence of the mason-dixon line were gifts to them because they were sperging about about leaving the union constantly.
        the fact was that slavery was becoming economically unsustainable with the mechanization of agriculture but the south wanted to hold on to it for cultural reasons.
        slavery was THE spark that ignited it all, this is why several reb states mentioned it explicitly in their declarations of secession. there was no more compromise to be had, the south had been appeased for decades and still wasnt willing to phase it out gradually.
        "they loved slavery so much and they seceded because of it" is the essence what it was all about

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's great and everything but it was still their constitutional right.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ONE NATION. INDIVISIBLE.
            this might be too understand for a redneck who barely has middle school reading comprehension

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You do know that the Pledge of Allegiance was created almost 30 years after the Civil War, right?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is the real take. Apologists always talk about economic and political differences but those ultimately stemmed from slavery as well

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the south already forced concession after concession
          >things like the 3/5 compromise
          You have a very, very myopic view of things. There's no historical argument against the simple fact that Congress, over many decades, did an absolutely atrocious job of looking after the well being of the entire country. The seeds for the civil war stretch back to the early 1800s and Congress repeatedly making idiotic moves that disproportionately impacted the developing economies of some states while bolstering others. Foolish decisions thinking they were 'harming' Great Britain did nothing of the sort but made it impossible for southern and western states and territories to industrialize by taking away their largest trading partner and depriving them (and the country as a whole) of affordable technical expertise and machinery to grow their economies. This short sightedness is why you saw the US being decades behind European nations in industrialization. Repeat this same tactic multiple times and you end up with the Nullification Crisis and one of the first major opportunities for the government to redress it's errors, which, Washington DC being what it is, only led to further abuses and refusals by anyone to work together on any issue for the good of the country.

          morons like you simply cannot think for a moment that actions have second order consequences and instead of looking back on the long, slow build up to the war, look at Lincoln and think that's all there was to it. The US Civil War is a wonderful cautionary tale of how to foment a crisis by refusing to act for the betterment of the country and instead picking winners and losers for short term political gains. Lincoln in particular is treated as something of a mythic being instead of a man who made many hard decisions (like killing draft protestors or openly allowing slave states to maintain slavery as long as they sided with the union).

          True revisionism is treating the war as though it was a simple matter.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are there any kinos about louis IX?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the french wanted rid of this monarchy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the ((french)) wanted rid of this monarchy
        FTFY

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer the prequel.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Gets me every time

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A little too sympathetic towards the south

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The South did nothing wrong.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >shipping millions of blacks into America
        >nothing wrong

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          uh that was the israelites

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the problem wasn't shipping them in, it was not sterilizing them or shipping them back after they served their purpose

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Slavery was legal in all the original 13 Colonies. Slaves were imported into the North via the ports of Boston, New York, and Philadelphia. The North didn't begin to outlaw slavery until the late 1700's, and there were slave states that never left the Union. The slaves had already been in the country for over 200 years by the time the Civil War happened. The South wanted to maintain the status quo while the North was full of radical shitlibs who wanted to free the blacks and give them rights just to spite the Southern whites (all while getting rich off Southern agriculture and enslaving Irish potato famine immigrants in everything but name).

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The south was still importing blacks up until 1860.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I mean yeah there was illegal human trafficking going on mostly through Florida and New Orleans, but the transatlantic slave trade and importation of slaves was outlawed in 1808.

              the south already forced concession after concession from the northern states in the decades long buildup. things like the 3/5 compromise and the existence of the mason-dixon line were gifts to them because they were sperging about about leaving the union constantly.
              the fact was that slavery was becoming economically unsustainable with the mechanization of agriculture but the south wanted to hold on to it for cultural reasons.
              slavery was THE spark that ignited it all, this is why several reb states mentioned it explicitly in their declarations of secession. there was no more compromise to be had, the south had been appeased for decades and still wasnt willing to phase it out gradually.
              "they loved slavery so much and they seceded because of it" is the essence what it was all about

              This is the real take. Apologists always talk about economic and political differences but those ultimately stemmed from slavery as well

              I mean yes slavery was an economic issue. The North was also profiting from Southern slavery.
              >Southern cotton was processed in Northern textile mills
              >The North imposed tariffs so that Southern cotton had to be shipped to Northern ports before it could be exported to Europe
              >Northern banks held slaves as collateral since Southern legal protections for the humane treatment of slaves (e.g. proving food, housing, medical care, etc.) created a guaranteed cycle of debt for large plantations
              >Northern insurance companies issued policies on escaped slaves and hired lawyers to represent slave masters in court to recover runaways
              The fact of the matter is that if Northern banks holding slave collateral had offered to reschedule loans to facilitate emancipation they would have had the moral high ground. They didn't. No antebellum Political Party called for compensated emancipation even though Britain peacefully end Slavery this way. The South actually had more free blacks than the North before the war broke out thanks to gradual emancipation (slaves would eventually buy their own freedom or slave masters would free all their slaves in their wills upon their own deaths) and the North's own Jim Crow laws and so-called "Black Codes" that restricted freed blacks from immigrating out of the South.

              the war was fought over a state's right to secede. slavery was a non-issue. Lincoln only freed the slaves to help win the war, and the Corwin amendment (which would have been the original 13th amendment and Lincoln helped create) wouldn't have even freed the slaves in states where it was legal. he wanted to send them all back to Africa after the war as well

              >he wanted to send them all back to Africa after the war as well
              He eventually changed his mind after meeting with Frederick Douglass who convinced him to give emancipated slaves full legal rights as citizens, including voting rights. This was primarily what inspired Booth to assassinate Lincoln. Most of the people who were members of the American Colonization Society were white Southerners.
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Colonization_Society

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >but the transatlantic slave trade and importation of slaves was outlawed in 1808.
                Do you honestly think this meant it wasn't happening?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Of course it still happened to some extent, but it severely cut off the supply of slaves from Africa because Britain also stopped participating in the transatlantic slave trade at the same time. Most slaves that were illegally trafficked into the country after 1808 would have come from the Caribbean.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >t. thinks real life conflicts are supposed to be like Star Wars where there are clearly-identifiable good guys and cartoonishly evil bad guys

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        read a history book, chud
        the good guys win at the end

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          But at what cost?
          >*gets stabbed by an urban youngster to own the chuds*

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Horrendous

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sure it's good. But I preferred it on drugs.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's a little too USA-centric, don't you think?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the war was fought over a state's right to secede. slavery was a non-issue. Lincoln only freed the slaves to help win the war, and the Corwin amendment (which would have been the original 13th amendment and Lincoln helped create) wouldn't have even freed the slaves in states where it was legal. he wanted to send them all back to Africa after the war as well

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I plagiarized parts of Sullivan Ballou's letter in some texts to a girl I had just broken up with because of this lmao

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *