>Sanjay and Craig. >big goat banana and cricket. >breadwinners (the toad cop was cute honestly)

>Sanjay and Craig
>big goat banana and cricket
>breadwinners (the toad cop was cute honestly)
> fanboy and chum chum
>bunsen is a beast
>middle most post
Jesus no wonder nick struggles to find another cash cow like spongebob, most of the shows they greenlit are shit

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the executives are the issue, they're probably complete fricking dumbasses with obviously terrible decision making skills.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, that's true.

      Really, Nickelodeon needs a significant restructuring in order to actually create a genuine success.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The worst part is that nick literally never greenlights anything that doesn't resemble spongebob

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, what's even worse is the number of promising pilots with ACTUAL FAN DEMAND that Nick's been sitting on for the last decade. Nick even went the extra mile of releasing each pilot publicly--likely to gauge audience response--yet they continue to resort to failed SpongeBob expys.

      Now we've gotten to a point where they truly don't care to even hide their overreliance on the Sponge and have simply committed to forcing out spin-off after spin-off after spin-off. I'm so tired of this shit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Seriously, someone in the company needs to start saying "No."

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        man I was really hoping top right would be a series, I honestly enjoyed the short. I'm still sad over how bad the make fiends creator got fricked over by nick

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Otis and Craig were voiced by the same guy
          I'm embarrassed to admit I never put 2 and 2 together.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Things like this only makes me wish the Viacom executives get eviscerated in the most horrible way and thrown to the wolves

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >No, what's even worse is the number of promising pilots with ACTUAL FAN DEMAND that Nick's been sitting on for the last decade. Nick even went the extra mile of releasing each pilot publicly--likely to gauge audience response--yet they continue to resort to failed SpongeBob expys.

        Industryanon here Disney actually looks at these pilots for potential buyouts for Disney Channel and Disney+ we just acquired pic related from Nickelodeon as Cinemaphile speculated and is on early development at the studio as a Disney Channel show.

        Disney is looking to buy these two for potential Disney Channel shows on 2026, we always laugh at Disney legal that Nickelodeon makes our job more easy beacuse they produce the pilots of our next animated hits while they just are focusing on keep milking Spongebob as opposed to take the same risk that made Spongebob sucessful.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Torum Tellum has potential, though i worry it could be too annoying

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What are the ones on the top left and bottom right called?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Left

          The Girl From Dinosaur Island

          Right

          >Ice Station Zedonk

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nine of the themes for these shows is simple enough. Spongebob was a simple nautical theme with settings and characters that all fit together, and the gags revolved around that.
    This list is a bunch of nothing.
    Make middlemost post's entire world a giant post office. Every facet of every characters life revolves around the inside of a giant post office. The local store is a hollowed out tape dispenser. The local pool is a water fountain with a stapler for a diving board. The main character is a stamp who lives like a bushman in a open stamp book stood up like a tent. The outside of the post office is some mysterious unknown to be used as various plot devices. And most importantly the main characters need a variety of temperaments and personalities. No matter how well you think test audiences respond to wacky zany and loud. Use actual variety.
    What the frick are creators doing? None of these shows are coherent. They're a bunch of nothing where the only unifying feature is that everyone is various types of the same annoying personality.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I was so confused when I watched the first episode of middlemost. There was no real introduction into the world are characters, aside from maybe the theme song. It felt kind of aimless

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >There was no real introduction into the world are characters, aside from maybe the theme song.
        Exactly like spongebob. Theme song tells you everything you need to know about him. Show is simple enough it grabs you.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I disagree. help wanted was a great first episode (help wanted) which established spongebob as a character and what he was all about than this. if you're talking about in general, I think spongebob just had. a more solid and understandable/interesting world than middlepost

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I disagree. help wanted was a great first episode (help wanted) which established spongebob as a character and what he was all about than this. if you're talking about in general, I think spongebob just had. a more solid and understandable/interesting world than middlepost

          I think the first quarter of SpongeBob's Season 1 was suppose to be the introduction of Bikini Bottom, not just Help Wanted.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            true

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They're all basically aimless. Which wouldn't be so bad if they had some clever iconic world to exist in with strong personalities that bounced off each other, naturally creating coherent and setting-relevant hijinks. But none of them have that. Maybe because the hack writers and showrunners are all the same brand of personality just like their characters, so they have to compensate with wacky crazy weird environments and themes that nobody outside their industry addled brains can even follow.

        >And most importantly the main characters need a variety of temperaments and personalities.
        I haven't really watched Middlemost Post, but they at least did the bare minimum of pairing an impulsive, happy-go-lucky protagonist with a more straight-laced and cautious father(?) figure. The only problem is these two don't make for a very novel or even engaging duo, and the writing really did rely on WACKY ZANY LOUD more often than not.

        Nickelodeon really does have a problem where the toons it produces tend to be rather juvenile compared to the other main children's networks. Nick doesn't even TRY to push for broad appeal anymore.

        Bad chemistry for that brand of entertainment. If you're making a fun show to be funny, then you need natural conflict that arises from the contrast of dispositions. And I mean conflict that drives the narrative, not just disagreements or drama between characters. And also to treat the situations with fairness as an author so that characters who start conflict, albeit funny, still get their comeuppance for a sense of closure to the viewer.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonyrnous

      >And most importantly the main characters need a variety of temperaments and personalities.
      I haven't really watched Middlemost Post, but they at least did the bare minimum of pairing an impulsive, happy-go-lucky protagonist with a more straight-laced and cautious father(?) figure. The only problem is these two don't make for a very novel or even engaging duo, and the writing really did rely on WACKY ZANY LOUD more often than not.

      Nickelodeon really does have a problem where the toons it produces tend to be rather juvenile compared to the other main children's networks. Nick doesn't even TRY to push for broad appeal anymore.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >where the toons it produces tend to be rather juvenile compared to the other main children's networks. Nick doesn't even TRY to push for broad appeal anymore
        weird considering the actually baby channel PBS has more shows I can actually enjoy

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          you might just be autistic

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            ellinor wonders why is fun to watch

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >you might just be autistic
            Welcome to Cinemaphile - Comics & Cartoons

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >show is too unfocused
      >needs more variety
      Pick one.
      It's just wacky rainbow multicultural island. Other shows have done similar. It's not the greatest but it's one of the few shows on near-basic cable I can actually watch. Ok, so they made the walrus a lesbian. Nobody's perfect.

      Ollie's Pack could probably go on that list too. It tried to coat=tail Owl House et al but with the boy the monster hunter angle but never coalesced. It felt like they were trying to introduce lore but the anime-style ease-in first season doesn't work with western shows.

      sex with Lily

      Her sisters are cuter. She just reminds me too much of Mayim Bialik.

      Please direct me to every episode this qt appears in

      I grabbed that from Sporty Parker. She may have shown up in the background since but it's hard to tell because there's a few other green plant girls around.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Her sisters are cuter.
        post em pls

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't have to pick one.
        The show's environment and themes are too complex and disjointed for what the show is. While the characters are in desperate need of defining dispositional variety to make them distinct enough to clash in some way. Those clashes are what generate intrigue in narratives.
        You shouldn't expect kids to take the time to learn the complicated world of a show about a bunch of pointless characters who just exist to say/do wacky stuff on a screen. You might as well animate a bunch of characters all hitting themselves over the head with a mallet in a loop while walking through a wacky world where wacky stuff is going on in the background.
        People like characters. You drive all storytelling through the characters. Intrigue through the characters would give incentive to learn a complex disjointed environment if you absolutely need to have one. The interplay of differences between characters is what engages a viewer or a reader. This principle exists whether the actual storytelling is complex or not. From the most basic Sesame Street interactions, to looney tunes, to the grittiest action shows.
        Having a unifying theme and environment is essential to giving a viewer a sense of familiarity and allowing them to more comfortably suspend their disbelief, as well as making the process of a new viewer tuning in very smooth. It makes things easier to follow, which is ideal for kids. However it's not quite as important as having a variety of personalities.
        Variety of conflicting characters = good story
        Simple unified world + character variety = great show
        Variety world + samey characters = noise on a screen
        There's something to be said about the tone interactions between setting and characters as well but that's another can of worms. Generally kid shows don't have to worry about that, but it's kino when they do.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >samey characters
          It sounds like you only watched a couple episodes. Aside from the mains, youve got::
          -not-sandy cheeks,
          -conniving mayor and not-smithers constantly trying to get rid of angus and his ship
          -extreme sports girl
          -meathead dudebros
          -old crusty scorpion guy
          -snooty rich people
          -stoner guy
          -spooky witch lady
          etc. etc. If the rest come off generic (including Pam) it's because they're supposed to be. They're (middle)mostly background characters. They're even color/species-coded for the most part so you can tell their character type. They're practically holding your hand in that regard. The only ones that are wacky for wacky's sake are the Reggies, but they're like MMP's answer to wackyland anyway.The worst you can say is it does try too hard to fit the Spongebob roster mold.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You're right that I only gave middlemost 2.5 episodes before moving on. I don't know the ones you listed but ideally you want your main characters to be the most engaging of the cast.
            Sure these characters sound like they've covered some interesting tropes. But besides maybe the mayor, are they driving the key events of the episodes because of the way they are? Their interaction with the main cast in order to build the narrative is their most vital reason for existing. Do they hold a grudge? Does their stubbornness cause an avoidable catastrophe? Are they so overly talented or overly attached the cast ends up in over their heads?
            And even more importantly are they all genuinely diverse in their dispositions, or are they all eventually prone to outbursts of goofiness, undermining their roles for the sake of making a moment silly? Sometimes you need to sacrifice a minor reaction or a gag to build up a much bigger and more satisfying joke, but many many writers instead choose to sacrifice the integrity of their character to make a silly face or dumb moment for easy comedic gratification. But that kind of thing turns everyone into samey characters for the sake of wacky. Even if their character descriptions don't necessarily say they're wacky.
            This isn't just about middlemost post, it's about all those shows on OP's list. It's all very sloppy and doesn't retain audiences, it all ends up being a bunch of directionless nothing where the point of watching is to see colors flash and scream and maybe mimic some human behaviors for the sake of being relatable. But it seems writers are getting worse and worse at being human.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I don't blame you. Even I find it a bit of a slog sometimes and I'm surprised it got a second season.
              To give you some examples regarding the characters though, the mayor has a grudge because when Angus's ship got stranded on middlemost mountain, it left his residence in perpetual shadow.

              In the extreme girl's (more of an adventure junkie actually)second appearance, she decided to run for mayor because it sounded like a fun job, with predictable results.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nick by FAR has to be one of the most autistically Ran “MONEY MONEY, BIG NUMBER NOW NOW NOW” Companies out there

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They messed out the lore based cartoons phenomenon in the 2010s by not having a lore centric cartoon like gravity falls to compete with the other networks
    They had the legend of korra but they treated it so awfully the final episode didn't even aired on TV until months after it premiered online plus in its later years korra has gotten a mediocre reception
    So it was all for nothing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I still don't get what went wrong with Monsters Abroad. That would've been a HIT.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Steven universe ass lookin shit
        Nah

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Seeing all those pilots collecting dust depresses me. Animation really is never going to get better, huh

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Until the creative leads start taking executive positions again like they did in the early-mid 1900s, then no. And in today's economy, nobody wants to take financial risks, which is why they have economic businessmen at the top. Problem is they usually don't have a creative bone in their body. Every decision they make is either built off of outdated statistics/trends, focus groups full of moronic people/stupid children, or personal biases against certain types of entertainment, all in a move to make the most money while risking the least amount.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I can't say much for Nick and Warner, but Disney's been knocking it out of the park lately. Every one of their new cartoons has been a banger. Here's hoping Chapek's layoffs don't target animation specifically.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        what is this

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur. This shit was delayed TWICE, but the wait seems to have been worth it. It's finally coming out early next year. I love how many current Disney cartoons have been leaning into the musical aspect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzY7Y0dYHNU&t=2s

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Both the mom and grandma can get it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur. This shit was delayed TWICE, but the wait seems to have been worth it. It's finally coming out early next year. I love how many current Disney cartoons have been leaning into the musical aspect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzY7Y0dYHNU&t=2s

        >Black people
        I will not watch your cartoon

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Crazy bastard.

          I still don’t get what happened to all the fans who disappeared between Seasons 1 and 2. It was like night & day.

          People got tired of waiting.

          • 1 year ago
            Perla Magica™

            >People got tired of waiting.
            Some people who have Nicktoons in Europe to watch the rest of the second season didn't get tired of waiting fot the online release.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Here's hoping Chapek's layoffs don't target animation specifically.

        It's only for the parks division from many Imagineers at Twitter.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    sex with Lily

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Please direct me to every episode this qt appears in

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ms. Pam had the more frickable design.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Forgot pic.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Forgot pic.

      and Craig
      kino
      >>big goat banana and cricket
      kino
      (the toad cop was cute honestly)
      kino
      >> fanboy and chum chum
      ultra kino
      is a beast
      kino
      most post
      kino
      why are Cinemaphiletroons so easily filtered by kino???

      https://i.imgur.com/WXXBd5r.jpg

      >Sanjay and Craig
      >big goat banana and cricket
      >breadwinners (the toad cop was cute honestly)
      > fanboy and chum chum
      >bunsen is a beast
      >middle most post
      Jesus no wonder nick struggles to find another cash cow like spongebob, most of the shows they greenlit are shit

      >phone spam samegayging again
      Frick off Bluemaxwell. Don't you have Camp Lazlo and Ren and stimpy threads to be keeping alive?

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sanjay and Craig was kino though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Right on. This is now a Sanjay and Craig thread.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Honestly, this is one of the better 2010’s Nicktoons and it had just as much qts as Middlemost and Breadwinners. (And the latter show was just shit)

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's Pony was RIGHT THERE MAN

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I still don’t get what happened to all the fans who disappeared between Seasons 1 and 2. It was like night & day.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        In their infinite wisdom, Nick moved the show to Nicktoons to make room for Middlemost Post.
        It's too bad. They still did some brilliant work in season 2, like the episode about the park tagger, and the one that took the piss out of shipping. If there's one silver lining, the show will forever be remembered without a downslide, as so happens with so many zombie shows networks decided to milk.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It’s one nicktoons now though, right?

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    and Craig
    kino
    >>big goat banana and cricket
    kino
    (the toad cop was cute honestly)
    kino
    >> fanboy and chum chum
    ultra kino
    is a beast
    kino
    most post
    kino
    why are Cinemaphiletroons so easily filtered by kino???

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The only one I can’t see anyone calling kino is Bunsen because it’s post-TUFF Hartman.

    • 1 year ago
      guy

      Nickelodeon was doing the exact same thing before SpongeBob with tripe like CatDog. They were too prideful to accept ren and Stimpy ( they still have a limited number of episodes on Paramount Plus) but couldn't do anything else but wish they still had Ren and stimpy. It shows that we need to build a animation field where actual quality animation can flourish, instead of looking towards dozens of hacks to try to imitate quality animation

      Animation industry opinion faking based

      I still don't get what went wrong with Monsters Abroad. That would've been a HIT.

      This is a Tumblr Millennials sort of thing. Extremely little appeal to kids. And they don't believe in Beauty so normies would have little interest

      No, what's even worse is the number of promising pilots with ACTUAL FAN DEMAND that Nick's been sitting on for the last decade. Nick even went the extra mile of releasing each pilot publicly--likely to gauge audience response--yet they continue to resort to failed SpongeBob expys.

      Now we've gotten to a point where they truly don't care to even hide their overreliance on the Sponge and have simply committed to forcing out spin-off after spin-off after spin-off. I'm so tired of this shit.

      Do you think actual kids want to see these or old twitter/tumblr want to see these? Big difference

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I mean most of the really popular cartoons nowadays seem to owe their success because of the Tumblr/Twitter crowd, so there's obviously some merit in trying to appeal to them

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That's because creators wising up and realizing pitching stuff to Nick is a bad idea.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hey sometimes you get desperate and will pitch to just about anyone. I'm sure plenty of artists who pitched or even successfully sold their pilots to Nick did it at least somewhat reluctantly.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nick executives don't understand that they're the problem. Spongebob was a success because it had a unique flavor and humor to it. Now we have a sea of Spongebob clones. Nothing stands out.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw Sanjay and Craig and PGBC were favorites of mine as a teenager
    Like I was really getting into Adult Swim at that time enjoying shit like Superjail and ATHF. Even if I was losing faith on Nickelodeon at that time, there were still some shows I liked watching though. I couldn't really get into Breadwinners because it was too repetitive.

    Also, thanks for not including Robot and Monster here because that show was surpassingly great and another favorite in my teen years. Frick Nick for scrapping the second season.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I liked the style but hated how much robot was mistreated

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Now that we are speaking of Nickelodeon BS, Dana Simpson mentioned that the adaptation of Phoebe and Her Unicorn is still on development but that they had to make Max as part of the main cast beacuse Nick felt that the show won't attract boys if the mc is all female.

    The funniest thing is that Dana mentioned that Disney was the most interested on adapting the book alongside the other bidders who where Netflix,Dreamworks and Apple

    If Dana choosed one of the four instead of Nick probably Phoebe and Her Unicorn would have been out by now.

    >https://www.nickalive.net/2022/11/dana-simpson-gives-phoebe-and-her.html#.Y3MGpBbns4s.twitter

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And see, that's the problem. I think some of the execs are genuinely sexist. I mean, we already have a lot of shows with guys in them.

      We saw that with 'The Casagrandes': they wanted Sid to have a brother, but one of the writers objected, saying they have enough boys already.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      my understanding of this is Nickelodeon wants the show to be a certain way and Dana wants it to be another way, which is why the show is in development a year later. Lincoln Pierce's Max & The Midknights (another book adaptation) was announced last year and already entered production, so it doesn't make since for this not to be being produced right now. It seems most likely to me Dana's literally holding her show from making any progress just because it's not the way she wants it to be. Nick probably wouldn't have announced the show so soon if they knew Dana would be a hard person to work with

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know, episodic adventures of a girl and unicorn? It can't be any more complicated than that.

        You didn't read the article? They said Nickelodeon wanted the show to emphasize Max because the executives thought its current form didn't attract enough of them.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          if Dana didn't interfere and just let nick do what they want the cartoon would be nearly done by now. What could've easily been a 2023 release could now be 2024 or even 2025

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            She was letting Nick do what they want, they were the ones who were asking for changes.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              She's not letting nick do what they want by arguing over those changes and causing development to be delayed over it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You clearly don't understand Nickelodeon's current dynamics.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You just don't want to believe Dana's the bad person in this situation because you don't support the network when it's obvious that the development is being held back by her choices while other shows that were announced in the same year her show was announced are already being produced and releasing next year.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The original article said, I quote:
                >Simpson said they have a script and a head writer, but now, the studio doesn’t think the show will appeal to boys. So, Simpson wrote a new treatment for the show featuring Max as one of the main characters. “That will have to be good enough because I’m not changing it,” and so far, Nickelodeon seems to be going along with that.
                https://www.bainbridgereview.com/life/bi-fans-get-the-point-about-unicorn-series/

                Furthermore, I say that because we know Nickelodeon has had similar concerns based on what happened with 'The Casagrandes' and the character of Sid Chang's sister Adelaide.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          *enough boys, I mean.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >episodic adventures of a girl and unicorn
          I've never read the book but I'm kind of tired of the "normal(or weird) kid with a magical animal friend" It's tiring. But execution is all that matters, so I can't judge

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Nick felt that the show won't attract boys if the mc is all female
      >Just premiered Monster High
      what's wrong with verity? I favorite show decades ago was SpongeBob but I love watching the entire other shows swell. Sometime I needed a break from all the nautical nonsense and went to go watch a kid with a knack for invention.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >nautical nonsense
        Heh.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Expecting Nickelodeon to greenlight good shows

    This is the network that passed on Adventure Time, Ed Edd n Eddy, and Phineas and Ferb. Nickelodeon wouldn't know a good show if it kicked them in the balls.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sanjay and Craig was great. Fight me, buttholes.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    and Craig
    >>big goat banana and cricket
    is a beast
    I liked these

    >> fanboy and chum chum

    Would only watch these if nothing else was on
    >(the toad cop was cute honestly)
    Didn't care for her but I can kind of see why anons would
    >tfw that episode that showed her butt hair

    most post
    Pretty meh and gay

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Sanjay and Craig
    That was was pretty good. Not amazing, but fun enough. Best show listed.

    >Pig Goat Banana Cricket
    I thought that was decent. Every episode I've seen always had at least a few moments that made me laugh.

    >Breadwinners
    There were some funny moments and a few good side characters. Otherwise, it's not that good of a show.

    >Fanboy and Chum Chum
    Eh, didn't truly hate it. I can see why others would. I loved the two clerks at the store though.

    >Bunsen is a Beast
    So bad that it got Hartman to leave Nickelodeon for a few years. Agreed.

    >Middlemost Post
    Never seen that one. Seems to be a very polarizing show around here so I'm concerned about giving it a shot. Then again, I did like Sanjay and Craig

    I'm surprised you didn't mention The Mighty B.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm surprised you didn't mention The Mighty B.
      Guilty pleasure honesty. It’s not really that good but I like the style a lot

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Middlemost is gonna get a Barnyard-style resurgence. Just fricking wait.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      middlepost isn't as memorable, it's just a generic kids show

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I really liked the way Pig Goat Banana Cricket's plot was split in 4 different segments, one for each main character and all subplots were connected in some way, any other shows like this?

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    and Craig
    I wanted to frick the snake.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Craig or Ronnie?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Who's Ronnie?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Craig’s brother from the finale episodes of Seasons 1 and 3.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Craig

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Monster high seems ok but they mustvemesssed up the schedule

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They just make simple kids' shows that aren't ashamed of being kids' shows, nothing wrong with it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Good kid shows don't make adults feel moronic for watching it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        kid shows that only appeals to kids are always shit. I miss when nick shows appealed to broad audiences

        >CHILDREN'S CARTOONS NEED TO BE SUPER COMPLEX
        why are autists so into "deep" and "dark" kids' shows?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What's wrong with exercising our brains?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      kid shows that only appeals to kids are always shit. I miss when nick shows appealed to broad audiences

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *