Saw X

Jiggy bros, we can’t stop fricking winning. This was kino to the limit.

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Jiggy bros
    This movie made me jiggy go to the polls to vote Liberal in 2021!

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The asian guy is cute. I kinda want to frick him.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    10 fricking saw movies while The Collector cant even finish its first trilogy.

    It's not fair.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      collect my nuts in your mouth

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What would the third movie be about? Iirc then the second movie ended pretty conclusively

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >

    [...]

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No I dont think I will

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    rockin'

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stop the other thread

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hello?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hi.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't like to say it but this was unironically mid, how in the frick is this rated higher than 1 and 2?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe because those who rated it higher liked how the OG serial killer was portrayed.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's much better tho.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I agree.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      there are very few times in my life that i can say i was genuinely shocked than i was the morning i woke up and saw a fricking SAW movie had a fresh rating on rotten tomatoes. i love the series but even the good ones the critics just absolutely annihilated.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >winning
    i cant even remember a single thing in that movie.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have only watched the first 2-3 movies.
    Until now.

    I was expecting something a little less... cringe. Like I enjoyed the setup to the movie, but the Magical knowing every move of the woman and her boyfriend part was too stupid.

    Like just put a little more thought into the writing and make it believable. Its okay to know her boyfriend would come, but to know oh they will walk here, they will now not just shoot us, they will then walk into the upstairs room, they will also not run out the door that is left open for 30 seconds before it slams shut

    like they could have made a good movie but chose to make it purposely shit?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This was kino to the limit.
    Really? I thought the first half hour or so was quite good, but the rest of it was just another torture-porn movie with bad acting and plenty of gore.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Best Saw movie since Saw VI

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Missed opportunity to use this as a credits song tbtbh

    ?si=Xa6Nzly7TnYz0Yl-

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Guy that makes these threads is an unemployed troony with a failed YouTube comedy channel

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Be honest, what could the law really charge him with? In every scenario I can think of he gets off scot free every time.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kidnapping, extortion, negligence,stalking, the list goes on my friend

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In the "Saw" film series, the character John Kramer, also known as Jigsaw, orchestrates a series of elaborate traps that often lead to severe injury or death for the individuals involved. While you might believe Jigsaw is "innocent and did nothing wrong," from a legal standpoint, he would be implicated in a variety of serious crimes. Some of the potential charges include:

      1. **Kidnapping**: For unlawfully seizing and detaining individuals.
      2. **False Imprisonment**: For holding individuals against their will.
      3. **Attempted Murder**: For designing and setting up traps with the intent to cause fatal harm, even if the victims survive.
      4. **Murder (First-Degree)**: For the deaths resulting from the traps and games he orchestrated, which are premeditated.
      5. **Felony Murder**: For deaths that occur during the commission of felonies like kidnapping or false imprisonment.
      6. **Assault and Battery**: For causing physical harm to individuals through his traps.
      7. **Torture**: For subjecting victims to extreme pain and psychological trauma.
      8. **Conspiracy**: If he collaborates with others to carry out his plans.
      9. **Terroristic Threats**: For instilling fear in his victims and the general public.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ai shitter

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Our AI overlords conclude that he'd be arrested

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I also asked AI why none of these would stick
        Kidnapping: While John Kramer does kidnap individuals, he often provides them with a choice to participate in his twisted games or face dire consequences. This could potentially be argued as not meeting the legal definition of kidnapping, where force or coercion is absent.
        False Imprisonment: Similar to kidnapping, John's actions might be seen as not constituting false imprisonment if participants are given a choice, albeit under extreme duress and with the threat of severe harm.
        Attempted Murder: Given that many of John's victims survive his traps, it could be argued that his attempts on their lives were unsuccessful, thus not constituting attempted murder. However, this would depend heavily on the jurisdiction and interpretation of the law.
        Murder (First-Degree): First-degree murder requires premeditation. While John plans his traps meticulously, the act itself is often committed by the victim themselves, making it difficult to prove direct involvement in the killing.
        Felony Murder: This charge applies when someone dies during the commission of a felony. Since John's actions don't typically involve him committing a felony himself but setting up scenarios, it might be challenging to apply this charge directly to him.
        Assault and Battery: John's methods often result in physical harm to his victims, but since these injuries occur within the confines of his traps, it could be argued that he did not directly assault or batter them, especially considering the choices they made.
        Torture: The legality of torture varies greatly by jurisdiction, and John's actions might fall into a gray area where intent to cause prolonged suffering versus survival instinct on the part of the victim complicates matters.
        Conspiracy: To charge John with conspiracy, one would need to prove that he conspired with others to commit crimes. Given that his operations are largely solitary efforts, proving a conspiracy might be challenging.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    As a giant Saw fan I can say I really enjoyed the first half hour of a very human Jigsaw. It was something new that added to the character. The rest apart from a few traps and gore was stupid, lazily written trash.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >grab my friend and lead him into a road
    >tell him "You can stand here and eventually get hit by a car, or you can simply walk away and live. The choice is yours"
    >he chooses to stand there and eventually gets hit by a car
    >this is somehow MY fault and makes me a murderer

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *