yeah
we know that
they became a problem when these
Now I know you're trolling. Yes, laws go through fucking congress. Are you dense?
It doesn't even matter, you aren't getting gun control or any kind of reduction of AR rifles anyways. AR types rifles have absolutely exploded in popularity in the past 20 years, more so than I can stress through words. This weapon platform is effectively hammered into the fabric of the country at this point.
Pic related, it's what the average gun store looks like in the US. Keep in mind gun stores like this are usually packed with people buying rifles like this, 6 days a week, 52 weeks a year.
The ship on gun control in the United States has not only sailed, it is far past the horizon. It isn't happening.
You better believe it, gay. They are REALLY fucking common and there isn't a single fucking thing you or anyone else can do about it. The supreme court ruled on this in 2008 in DC vs. Heller. The individual has the right to keep any weapon in common use for lawful purposes. It's fucking settled.
It is incromphensible, I mean totally totally baffllig to the rest of the world why those shouild be sold in such numbers to normal people
Can you not see how insane this is ?
>totally baffllig to the rest of the world
Guess what? The United States isn't the rest of the world, and isn't bound by the laws, cultures, and traditions of the rest of the world. The US was founded on RABID individualism, self preservation, and individual freedom, and the gun is the physical manifestation of those ideals. Gun culture is literally fucking HAMMERED into the fabric of the ways this country thinks and operates. You are never, ever going to change it.
KEK, how those Reagnomics working out for you? Reagan was the beginning of the end. We used to have great Presidents before him. Reagan opened up the floodgates for hacks.
He literally had dementia for 1/3rd of his time in office. Nancy was our first female President. He wouldn't understand a question and she would whisper into his ear and he would answer. He was a bumbling, senile, moron. Nancy Reagan was always staunchly pro-life until Ronnie got Alzheimer, then she became a vocal advocate of stem cell research.
Under Trump taxes were lower, gas prices were lower, fuel prices were lower, illegal immigration was lower, inflation wasn't out of control, crime was lower, there wasn't a mass shooting every week, a literal chud wasn't running the Health branch, official White House staff were not disseminating literal anti-cop fake news to the public on social media, CRT was banned in military training and Russia wasn't invading other countries.
>If you aren't bearing a gun in defense of the fatherland then you don't need one.
Nah, fuck off, we need them to defend ourselves, our families, our homes, our property, etc., because ghe government has proven invariably that it is unable or often just outright unwilling to do it for us.
Fuck you, grabby. Go get mugged or raped or something.
>media doesn't influence kids into violence! >this actor doesn't like guns?! but he USED a prop gun in a movie!
The issue is that he's being paid millions to make what is essentially "pro-fun propaganda", dipshits.
Are you being disengenuous and attacking a Strawman? Or are you legitimately so stupid that that point went over your head? Lol imagine getting intellectually filtered by fucking Brietbart.
The fact that you want to normalize kids getting murdered like this as just part of life so that you can keep feeling like a big boy when you own dozens of guns as a penis enlarger is very, very, very sad and sick.
I hate this argument because it's basically 'we agree firearms are bad and he's a bad man for having supported them in the?past'
This doesn't work on liberals. They don't care they are hypocrites. They DO NOT CARE. They just want guns taken away. They wouldn't care if the NRA or fucking the Las Vegas killer did it.
Youre deliberately sliding your own argument to be more like them.
>Y-y-yeah guns are bad and he's a bad g-g-gun person.
Guns are literally the only check on a tyrannical government. Literally the only. The only third option is some other nation coming in and killing them and guess what the only nation doing that is USA. Chinks wouldn't give two fucks as long as you pay $2 led paint lined toys for your kids form them.
No, it doesn't. What do uou think a well regulated means? Or is that part of the 2nd amendment too hard to read due to how much blood and jizz from gun nuts has been plastered on it?
Are you part of a well regulated militia? Or are you just a flag wearing dipshit who thinks owning fifty guns makes you Rambo?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Why do you keep building strawmen in your head?
I love how Twittertrannies can't argue so they have to resort to ad homs based on nonexistent stereotypes, such as "if u like gun u have small penis lololololol".
1 year ago
Anonymous
It's not a strawman, it's clear part of American culture to compensate your sense of lack of manhood via gun ownership.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>It's not a strawman, it's clear part of American culture to compensate your sense of lack of manhood via gun ownership.
Got a problem with that, chud?
1 year ago
Anonymous
> implying leftist trannies are bastions of masculinity
Lol
1 year ago
Anonymous
No, it's literally just projection on your part.
Doubly so considering Leftists have been clinically and scientifically proven over and over again to have higher Estrogen and be less masculine, less fit, less healthy and less conventionally attractive on average than rightwingers.
Can't help but notice you have zero actual evidence that guns are "to compensate for a tiny penis" or whatever drivel you believe.
This is settled precident. The Militia, being well regulated (In good working order) is every able bodied male aged 18-45 in the USA.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246
A well regulated Militia is one thing: YOU. Therefor, you have the right to keep and bear arms. Simple as. This is settled and done as far as the law is concerned.
Interesting take, but it's not exactly correct. A modern wording for the Amendment would be something like this:
In order for the people to effectively operate a militia, they have the right to keep and bear arms.
Or something like that. The militia is the people, and in order to keep the militia up to snuff, the people have the right to own guns. This is how modern law and the Supreme Court sees it.
1 year ago
Anonymous
It seems to me like if they wanted the 2nd to be a right of the militia, they would have just said "The right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
To me, the fact they have a split between militia and people means they aren't exactly the same thing.
I found it sort of a dumb argument when they were coming up with shit in the 1934 NFA because of just saying "Well, this gun has no purpose in a militia", which, sure it would, what self respecting militia force wouldn't see the utility in having a machine gun, or suppressors if we're thinking in terms of them actually engaging some enemy in combat? Or SBRs, which obviously most of the military uses, so clearly there's a clear utility for it in any armed conflict, or even that short barreled shotgun at the center of it.
It was just a bunch of BS, and the whole case was funky because they didn't even let the defendent side say anything before making their decision.
It was a bunch of bullshit they pulled out of their asses and didn't allow arguments against it.
>gun control doesnt mean you arent allowed to have guns
Depends on what gun control you're talking about.
You're talking like universal background checks, sure.
Assault weapons ban by definition takes guns from people.
If tomorrow they announced that they were going to put a total freeze on all Playstations and make them illegal unless you owned one already and even as Japan got PS6-10, you'll be jailed for even trying to get one, you'd all be screaming that they're taking video games away, and you'd be right.
Or if they suddenly said they were banning everyone from owning pick up trucks unless they had one already, but no more Ford F-150s if you didn't have one you're SOL, you'd say they're taking away your trucks.
This reminds me of when Fox News had a meltdown over Bradley Cooper being at some democratic event after he played a consertative in American Sniper. They were like. WHY IS HE THERE, HE'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE THERE! Before that they were literally in love with him.
This. Even bleeding heart liberals have stocked up over the moronmania or the possibility of another, worse massive government overreach and possible rounding up people for """"quarantine """"
...to realize that all your life–you know, all your love, all your hate, all your memories, all your pain–it was all the same thing. It was all the same dream, a dream that you had inside a locked room, a dream about being a President.
isolated schizos, sure, but the current trend, like everything else wrong (socially) in the country, is entirely manufactured by aggressive 24/7 news-as-entertainment coverage. we're so far gone that profiting on the lives of children in third world countries isn't enough to sate our entertainment-industrial complex. to increase revenue further, they've moved to something just short of BEGGING fringe psychos to give them something to report about by implicitly offering to make them famous.
You haven't realized that the media intentionally promotes mass shooters and turns them into celebrities to instigate mass shootings? Don't you remember when the Joker movie was coming out and the journos were practically BEGGING someone to commit a shooting at a theater playing Joker? How have you not figured this out yet? When the New Zeeland shooting happened, every New Zealand news outlet blurred Tarrant's face and didn't mention his name because it is common fucking sense you don't give these monsters attention. The media knows this and causes children to die for money. It's so obvious.
They are insane if they think anyone is giving them up. The cops literally taser parents who wanted to go in and save their kids in that school while NINETEEN pigs stood down for an hour while the shooter did whatever the fuck he pleased
That and standing idly by while morons and degenerate criminals burned down cities and people's livelihood all summer because they themselves kneeled on a morons neck while he overdosed for 20 minutes
Maybe if they weren't so fucking incompetent there could be some trust and assurance but not now. All this shit says to anyone paying attention is there will be no one to protect you when the horses come except for yourself
The US isn't some shitty little island that is 90% uninhabited or a tiny ass European country. Fuck, the states run themselves like countries. There will be a succession and a civil war before people willingly disarm themselves, and they will have the backing of most of the men in the military and police when they do it.
The fact that you want to normalize kids getting murdered like this as just part of life so that you can keep feeling like a big boy when you own dozens of guns as a penis enlarger is very, very, very sad and sick.
I don't think a lot of people in this thread really comprehend just how out of the realm of reality getting any kind of federal gun control is.
It literally won't happen. In 2012, you had a Democratic president, a Democratic senate, and a Democratic House. An entire classroom of Kindergarteners were killed. Obama put forth the most inneffective, lukewarm, watered down, do nothing gun control bill ever concieved. IT DIDN'T EVEN GET CLOSE TO MAKING IT TO A VOTE IN THE SENATE BEFORE IT DIED. It literally never got close to getting voted on, let alone passed. And it was a bill that was so useless it didn't even have anything to do with how the Sandy Hook shooter got his gun.
You have to get SIXTY votes in the senate to pass gun bills. SIXTY. I don't think I need to tell you guys how literally impossible that is in todays enviornment.
You have ZERO chance of ever getting anything even close to resembling gun control through the government. It literally isn't going to happen. All Obama's bill did was slightly enhance background checks, and it got crushed immediately in a senate that was friendly to him. And you think you are actually going to see a weapon as common as the AR-15 legislated against? Don't make me laugh.
The AR-15 is easily the most common and ubiquitous rifle in the US. There are far, FAR more guns in the US than people. It's somewhere north of half a billion guns, but we honestly don't know as there is no gun registration in the US.
There are more AR-15 rifles in the US than there are people in any single European country.
And guess what? If they did somehow do something about AR type rifles, the supreme court has already ruled that arms "in common use" are protected without question. Guess which firearm is the most commonly used today?
Now I know you're trolling. Yes, laws go through fucking congress. Are you dense?
It doesn't even matter, you aren't getting gun control or any kind of reduction of AR rifles anyways. AR types rifles have absolutely exploded in popularity in the past 20 years, more so than I can stress through words. This weapon platform is effectively hammered into the fabric of the country at this point.
Pic related, it's what the average gun store looks like in the US. Keep in mind gun stores like this are usually packed with people buying rifles like this, 6 days a week, 52 weeks a year.
The ship on gun control in the United States has not only sailed, it is far past the horizon. It isn't happening.
It is incromphensible, I mean totally totally baffllig to the rest of the world why those shouild be sold in such numbers to normal people
Can you not see how insane this is ?
1 year ago
Anonymous
The rest of the world is insane to me. But that's the beauty of diversity, our countries are different and that's OK!
1 year ago
Anonymous
>became the norm
You better believe it, gay. They are REALLY fucking common and there isn't a single fucking thing you or anyone else can do about it. The supreme court ruled on this in 2008 in DC vs. Heller. The individual has the right to keep any weapon in common use for lawful purposes. It's fucking settled.
[...] >totally baffllig to the rest of the world
Guess what? The United States isn't the rest of the world, and isn't bound by the laws, cultures, and traditions of the rest of the world. The US was founded on RABID individualism, self preservation, and individual freedom, and the gun is the physical manifestation of those ideals. Gun culture is literally fucking HAMMERED into the fabric of the ways this country thinks and operates. You are never, ever going to change it.
Secretly deep down you must think to yourselves
I should not be allowed to own one of these
I have no real use for it and it is just posturing
1 year ago
Anonymous
It always amuses me when I hear people's opinions on guns and it's clear they've never used one in their entire lives.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>I should not be allowed to own one of these
A reasonable person doesn't want their own individual rights taken away. Why would you ever want that? You are kneecapping yourself for a false sense of safety. You are out of your fucking mind.
What I should or shouldn't be allowed to own is literally irrelevant, as it is recognized as a God given right in the United States. There is no justification involved in ownership of guns here.
1 year ago
Anonymous
and how exactly is owing one of those going to maintain your rights?
it will only lead to esclation and your death
1 year ago
Anonymous
Do you have any idea who the biggest group of gun enthuiests are in the United States? Clearly you don't, I'm starting to think you aren't American and don't know any gun owners based on how flat out clueless your questions are.
Protip: most gun owners are Police Officers, family of Police Officers, Military, and Retired military. Go walk in any gun store. Most of the staff is going to be active or retired Military 90% of the time.
Why would you ever assume that the people who do the heavy lifting for the government wouldn't also participate in and appreciate their God given rights to bear arms? They enjoy their constitutional rights just as much as everyone else. In my state (Tennessee) the State government has already declared they won't recognize any gun confiscation and would actively tell people not to turn in their guns. Try again, fool.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>and how exactly is owing one of those going to maintain your rights? >How would the garden gnomes being heavily armed and supplied have prevented the Holocaust?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Well I'm not a cuck, so no.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Nope
I think the opposite
I think that committing practical mutiny should be a right to all people around the world, and thus, ever civilian should have access to the same and even more powerful weapons than the strongest militaries.
1 year ago
Anonymous
whilst it is a noble thought I can only see such a world view ultimately leading to many waco type situations
1 year ago
Anonymous
we'd still be ruled by roman catholic priests if not for it. and they'd be busy having orgies and raping little boys in the courtrooms while you could do nothing about it.
1 year ago
Anonymous
When did Roman Catholic priests rule America?
1 year ago
Anonymous
This
1 year ago
Anonymous
Can you not see how insane it is literally putting people in jail for tweeting about Islam?
1 year ago
Anonymous
OF course
those views are not mutually exclusive
1 year ago
Anonymous
You can shit on muslimes all you want in my country
1 year ago
Anonymous
>the rest of the world
Who? Those people that never stop flooding our side of the internet and yapping their samey boring shit? That follow us site after site and then pretend like they aren’t following? Cannot ever care, outsiders are filler.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>why those shouild be sold in such numbers to normal people
Because that's what guns are now, they got better. Better design, more modular, more accurate, intutitive, ect.
It'd be like saying people can't buy pistols, only revolvers because you insist they should be stuck with 1850s tech despite never applying that standard to anything else, you want to ban Glocks because they're 'too good' in your opinion and you don't care about any reason why someone might not want to still be using a Colt Single Action Army or something.
1 year ago
Anonymous
yes
they are designed for one thing
to kill as many people in the shortest time possible
and wow what could possible go wrong
with this model of gun ownership
1 year ago
Anonymous
Don't you have some pakis to get beheaded by? Why do you cuck fucking third worlders always butt in and think anyone here gives a fuck what you think?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Why do you think europe is a single country?
1 year ago
Anonymous
He doesn't. But if you don't collectivize them you're individually too small to matter.
Many of your countries have a smaller, less relevant economy than the state of Alabama.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I dont think economy of alabama is relevant anywhere outside of us, while individual eu countries can have some economical connections to entire world via selling some niche stuff
1 year ago
Anonymous
>they are designed for one thing >to kill as many people in the shortest time possible
Nah, they're designed to put accurate shots quickly downrange or on target. It could be used for many reasons beyond just people killing if you're not a psycho path. It can be used for self defense, sport, or hunting.
It's like saying "The only thing a car is good for is running people over" after Waukesha, clearly ignoring the millions of people who do no such thing with their cars and clearly have other utility for them. Same here, there's tens of millions of people with AR-15s that never are used in anger either except against paper or steel targets.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>they are designed for one thing >to kill as many people in the shortest time possible
That's weird because most shots fired from a gun never kill anyone.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Dumb gay gay from an irrelevant poor country.
Shut up.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Reddit invasion in 2016.
1 year ago
Anonymous
The rest of the world is dominated almost totally by the United States.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>It is incromphensible, I mean totally totally baffllig to the rest of the world why those shouild be sold in such numbers to normal people >Can you not see how insane this is ?
Why would the rest of the world ban normal people from owning an essential tool? That sounds a lot more insane.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Compare America's homicide rates to Europe, Japan, Canada etc
1 year ago
Anonymous
London is a violent shithole.
1 year ago
Anonymous
A "violent shithole" whose homicide rates are lower than any major city in America
1 year ago
Anonymous
>A "violent shithole" whose homicide rates are lower than any major city in America
Then why is it still worse than most of them?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Ban cities
1 year ago
Anonymous
Ah yes, clearly the common thread here is guns.
Not an additional factor that you and your ilk don't want to mention.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Wow something in common those cities all have. Democrat run hellholes and, say it with me
N
1 year ago
Anonymous
What is ESSENTIAL about a AR15?
apart from can pretend you are rambo on the firing range
1 year ago
Anonymous
>What is ESSENTIAL about a AR15?
What's essential about air conditioning?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Good analogy
It would be like living in a small house with a very mild climate but having the conditioning unit of a small office block
1 year ago
Anonymous
>It would be like living in a small house with a very mild climate but having the conditioning unit of a small office block
I need it to cool my mining rig dummy
1 year ago
Anonymous
There is nothing about the word essential anywhere in US federal gun law or the constitution. The AR15 is in common use, therefor it is protected. Rights do not have to be explained to justified.
1 year ago
Anonymous
What is ESSENTIAL about Pride parades?
1 year ago
Anonymous
>What is ESSENTIAL about a AR15?
Low recoil, highly modular, ease of use, many people like the familiarity of it because it's a weapon people have had for 50 years now and many know it, it's accurate, easy to put attachments on like foregrips and scopes/red dots, ergonomic, and all in one package.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I see
I do get it and I will admit that i am clueless when it comes to guns
but to me it just seems like it is a machine gun in disguise, which are regulated.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>but to me it just seems like it is a machine gun in disguise, which are regulated
Machine gun= pull trigger and it fires till you let go
Seni-auto which the AR15 is= pull trigger and one bullet fires until you pull again
1 year ago
Anonymous
>but to me it just seems like it is a machine gun in disguise
I have 6 of them in my gun case right now. Take it from me, it isn't. They are functionally different. The M16 and M4 Carbine (the fully automatic machine gun versions) have different internal diameters of the reciever, a whole other pin through the reciever, and several machine gun only parts that make them function different. The AR-15 is only capable of Semi Automatic fire. Think the kind of fire you would imagine from a hand gun- One pull of the trigger, one bullet. That's what the AR15 does. The M16/M4 are capable of firing the entire magazine of ammo with a single trigger pull, or a 3 round burst fire, depending on the model. The AR-15 does not have the parts to fire like that.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>but to me it just seems like it is a machine gun in disguise
Just because something looks the same doesn't mean it is the same, like two computers could have the same case but different internals, or two cars look alike but one's a manual diesel and the other one is an automatic gas.
Obviously the big difference is the fact that one has the ability to fire in full auto, not just rapid for a person with a fast finger but that actual 800-900 RPM rate that comes with an autosear and fire selector if needed.
But I mean, while the AR-15 is very similar to an M4 with a few missing features and altered internals to make it semi auto only, take by comparision, the M9 and the Berreta 92, which is legal to own, and literally has no actual features or capabilities that I know of that make it any different from the military M9, but there's no accusation that 9mm semi auto is a weapon of war despite them being far closer.
Or even a hunting rifle like a Remington 700 is virtually the same gun as the M24 sniper rifle.
And to be completely fair, I find the regulation sort of marginal at best, since 1) Automatic fire is more for use with suppression and playing a bigger role in military scenarios where you're talking about sort of covering fire for flanks and tactical movements to take out or advance on an enemy than what a lone person is doing by themselves, followed up by a lot of soldiers don't use full auto and stick to semi auto anyway because it wastes bullets in combat when you'd rather put one or two well placed accurate shots on target instead of spray and pray, and if they switch to full auto, again, it's for suppression and covering fire so the fireteam or buddy can advance to a better shooting position, ect.
Full auto I feel is alright to be banned because it's so tied into that sort of thing where it's utility is really in that sort of fire and maneuver stuff, while bad guys can just spray and pray because they really don't care who gets hurt.
1 year ago
Anonymous
To follow up, just as a thought experiement, I've thought since the 2nd Amendment is an individual right, and some of the questions is where does the line lie for what should be allowed for the general populace, since shit like nukes or biological weapons I think are clear shouldn't be allowed.
I had the thought that perhaps it should be that it ensure it for anything considered an individual weapon, which would allow most of the common sense things to be out still, such as tanks, jets, ect since they're not individual weapons, they take crews and support systems with greater outsized externalities, ect.
You could go down to even apply this to machine guns since IIRC machine guns are also considered a crew served weapon and by this 'individual' standard, would not be allowed, but individual weapons like full auto M4s or AKs would be allowed.
Personally I'd also have a registration system, not even unprecedented. I mean, you have to register to vote, a core fundamental US right, so it's not that much to say it couldn't apply for a weapon either
1 year ago
Anonymous
>To follow up, just as a thought experiement, I've thought since the 2nd Amendment is an individual right, and some of the questions is where does the line lie for what should be allowed for the general populace, since shit like nukes or biological weapons I think are clear shouldn't be allowed
If you want to go by the founding fathers private citizens could own the most state of the art military equipment if you could afford it. The Supreme Court doesn't really keep to this though and the line has clearly been drawn.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Yeah, Biden's whole "You couldn't own a cannon back in the day" is really dumb because it's just a flat out lie that not even Politifact could try to cover him up from, you could, people could even buy/commission full on warships, like imagine if someone could just buy or make a modern cruiser or something.
But I think there's obviously got to be a point for practicality and I mean, you really can't just have anyone owning full on nuclear weapons and shit.
But the thought experiment was more for what would people think of, of the line being that individual weapons allowed vs crew and above ie actual Machine guns like the M240 and up banned since they're 'crew' and would require interpretation or influencing others beyond a person's individual right to utilize a crew served weapon system.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>you really can't just have anyone owning full on nuclear weapons and shit.
I've always like the idea that people should be able to own 'mass destructive' devices if they live far enough away from others and can secure them to keep them from being an accidental harm to their neighbors. If a man lives away from people, and is responsible in storage and care, he shouldn't be disallowed grenades or missles and the like.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I'm not sure you really can do that with weapons of mass destruction, I mean, it goes, even assuming no one gets caught in the initial blast, you have no control over the fallout and who that'll effect/kill once it's swept up in the wind and shit. Same with biological/chemical weapons, you just have zero control over it once you let it out, especially with a bio weapon since that could easily just jump from person to person in a way you couldn't possibly reasonably predict.
Even going down to like grenades, it's just too much collaterally. Even if you were to chuck a grenade at a baddie, all the fragmentation and shit can hurt and kill people way far away that you had no intention to because it's just a bomb and indescriminate. At least with a bullet you've got a much tighter degree of control about where it goes by aiming, and even then shit happens like overpenetration, happens all the time, like a few months ago that little 6 year old kid got killed because the police had to shoot some maniac and the bullet went through him through the wall and into her head. There's a balance that does need to be struck.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Weapon of mass destruction is kind of a fluid word that can mean several different things. Something like a missle is controlled, yet still has a radius of damage. Something like Chemical weapons or radiation are subject to wind and the environment, and therefor not nearly as controllable and probably wouldn't fall under 2nd Amendment protection. It could be argued that a grenade is controllable because you can choose where to throw it, and there is no more damage after the initial blast. Much like how you can direct gun fire, but can't control the bullet after it leaves the gun.
1 year ago
Anonymous
It's sort of a matter of degree, since like you control where the grenade goes, but you're sending out hundreds of bits of shrapnel in all directions, it operating on being less discriminant than a bullet since while you lose control of the bullet, the bullet tends to want to go in a particular direction due to momentum, and isn't doing like an AOE radius of damage of just whoever happens to exist around it when it goes off.
I mean it's like saying chemical weapons are controllable because you can determine where you set them off.
I don't see Weapons of Mass destruction as a fluid word, it's just shit that's been misused by the mainstream media since they're claiming anything they don't like is a WMD, they'll say a glock is a WMD.
WMD are really the big indiscriminate killers, namely nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, NBC=WMD to me, and everything else is conventional.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Yeah, Biden's whole "You couldn't own a cannon back in the day" is really dumb because it's just a flat out lie that not even Politifact could try to cover him up from
On the contrary it looks like pundits told him to stop with it because outright lying harms your cause. More so when you are the president lying about US history.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Hasn't seemed to stop him much since he said that in his big Gun speech, as well as the "gun manufacturers are completely protected from liability unlike any other industry" which is a lie that's been told since that law passed in 2005, hell Hillary was saying it all the way up to the election in 2016 and Politifact even had to give her a false, but she kept saying it because it plays to the base, they don't care if it's true or not, they just want all guns gone and don't care how its done. Hell, Bernie made the mistake of being genuine and honest in one of the debates with her saying "It's not true, it only provides protection from lawsuits in the way you can't sue a hammer manufacturer if someone kills someone else with a hammer, or how you can't sue car and beer makers for people who kill someone if they drink and drive."
And the democratic/leftist base gutted him for saying what was an absolutely true fact.
You fail to realize the real reason why the government won't ban guns. Forget about kids being blsted. For the government is a big business. That's all. They don't care about your 2nd amendment. That's just another excuse. It's all about profit and nothing else.
That retard has a point though. Since the office idiots do nothing to change things i wouldnt be surprised. And why would they care about our rights anyway?
>The AR-15 is easily the most common and ubiquitous rifle in the US.
I think this is big too on a constitutional level since one of those standards coming out from DC vs Heller was that it could only ban weapons that were dangerous and unusual weapons.
I mean, 1) You could argue easily all weapons are dangerous, so it'd really have to be something that is extremely or unusually dangerous, and that's hard to do with an AR-15 since doesn't have a particularly powerful round, many hunting rounds like .308 and 30-06 have two to three times the kinetic energy/power per shot, semi-auto guns and their fire rates have been common for 100 years in rifles, pistols and shotguns, and you can't claim the AR-15 is unusual when it's probably the most ubiquitous and common rifle around these days, and becoming more so by the day, especially if you include guns patterned on it but in different calibers like all the AR-10s and derivatives that exist for people wanting to shot .308.
It'd be like claiming a Ford F-150 is dangerous and unusual.
Those countries were both shit when that happened. Guns culture is a backbone of this nation's history. Best they are going to get is something like having AR-15s and AK-47s get a 21yo age limit federally or something like that. No way the US will be disarmed until the boomers and Gen Xers die out at least.
>having AR-15s and AK-47s get a 21yo age limit federally or something like that
I always laugh my ass off when politicians try to do this stupid shit. What exactly IS an AR15? A Sig Sauer MCX certainly isn't an AR15. Try to exchange parts between the two rifles and see what happens. It doesn't work. So there would be literally nothing stopping an 18 year old from just buying that rifle instead. If they banned every rifle by name, Gun manufacturers would make a rifle tomorrow that isn't on the list specifically for 18 year olds to buy. These are the dumbest, do nothing bullshit laws I've ever heard of.
normalfags lapping this up are the most pathetic fucking wastes of oxygen. he's an ACTOR for fucks sake. he has been playing make believe for 30 years. like, no one is really this fucking naive right?
Honestly I found MM pretty well balanced on the whole thing, most Hollywood types would have gone way harder on shit and been going the 2nd Amendment should be repealed or no one needs guns period, ect.
He didn't even go to an AWB or magazine ban, I think the biggest one he said was the raising it to 21, which I think is wrong but if he's stopping there it's pretty neat to see some moderation, and I think the framing is fine, I am sick of people abusing the 2nd and killing people and slowly fucking us all over.
I can see why it would be more upsetting if it was your home town to knee jerk at this sort of thing. He's been hunting at a political career for a while though so this also gets his foot in the door.
He's a very ugly man in desperate need of attention. Can't even dress well. Who goes to the white house without a fucking tie? How much more formal does it get than the white house
Hollywood actors who think they're too cool for ties, socks, and deoderant are gay
I wonder if McConaughey is aware just how much disdain the average person has for out of touch Hollywood actors who live in their own world coming down from Mt. Olympus to tell us to "do better" before shuffling off in their limousines
>Democrats thinking they will be able to go ANYWHERE with "gun control" after Summer of Terror 2020
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
It's not happening, gays. You killed any argument for "gun control" for at least the next 20 years, maybe 30 years.
People watched while Democrats torched people's homes & businesses and murdered their families while Democrat DA's put perpetrators right back on the streets and Democrat Mayors told police to stand down and let it happen. People KNOW that you're disengenuous evil fucks that unironically want them and their families dead; AT LEAST the white ones. People KNOW they cant count on police or government actually protecting them anymore thanks to Denocrats. People KNOW they have to defend themselves and their families and their property now. You went to the trouble of proving it to them.
More than a million homes that never had firearms before purchased firearms in the months after you turned cities into one of the fucking Purge movies. In fact that's why I am looking forward to the inevitable next Democrat chimp-out. People are ready for you this time. We're going to see A LOT of fat, dead Communists with ventilated chests lying face down on people's lawns, irrigating their grass with high-Estrogen blood. I wonder if it will make the dandelions grow freakish bitch-tits and hang themselves afterwards? Lol.
Why the fuck did they do this again? Was there a valid reason to hold back the parents or something? I know the pigs are evil cowards but this is a whole other level
Because letting untrained AND psychotically emotional civilians rush loudly into a hostage/armed shooter situation is a fucking quick way to get them AND the people inside killed?
They wanted to do that because their kids were being shot and the police were sitting outside doing nothing, numbnuts. Maybe the police should have grown some fucking balls and went into the school to save the kids instead of giving the shooter free reign for an hour.
stfu bootlicking shill, kids were being blown away while cops sat outside stopping parents
None of what you said contradicts what I said.
You're ignorant and don't know how these situations work.
If that had happened and the parents got themselves AND more kids blown away you'd be screeching OMG WHY DIDN'T THE POLICE STOOOOOOOOP THEEEEEEEEEEM REEEEEEEEEEEE.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Ignores the part about the pigs doing nothing to save the kids
So dishonest. Do you even believe what you say anymore?
1 year ago
Anonymous
But I wasn't talking about that?
I was explaining why untrained, emotional randos aren't let lose in a hostage/active shooter situation. Which I did and you're still mad about.
You unironically label any sane opinion as being for "Fox News watching boomers", zoomy.
Oh boy, I am prepped and ready to give up my civil liberties and ability to defend myself in a nation with skyrocketing crime.....because if I don't some zoomtard who couldn't answer the question "What is a woman?" and eats fucking Tide Pods for Tik Tok cred will accuse me of watching Fox News or some shit!
>THOSE STUPID AND COWARDLY POLICE DID NOTHING TO PROTECT THE CHILDREN, THE POLICE ARE USELESS AND SHOULD BE ASHAMED >WHOA WHOA WHOA, YOU WANT TO OWN A GUN? DON'T YOU KNOW THE POLICE WILL PROTECT YOU AND ARE ONLY A CALL AWAY?
Compare America's homicide rates to Europe, Japan, Canada etc
1 year ago
Anonymous
>London is safer than any US city
London is less safe than any city where you can carry a gun.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Name one major city that has a lower homicide rate than London
1 year ago
Anonymous
>London is less safe than any city where you can carry a gun.
Pure delusion.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I'm safe regardless because I have a gun. You are only safe until something bad happens.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I'm sorry, I misread your post.
1 year ago
Anonymous
That's not what that chart shows, dipshit.
It shows that London is "safer" then several cherry-picked US cities, all of which are coincidentally Democrat strongholds.
Hmmmmmm.....
THERE ARE MORE THAN HALF A BILLION GUNS IN THE US ALREADY
GUESS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU RESTRICT GUNS?
LAWFULL PEOPLE CAN NO LONGER GET THEM
UNLAWFULL PEOPLE HAVE FREE REIGN OVER HALF A BILLION GUNS
Look, I know this is hard for you to understand, but the US isn't a country that has a handful of farmers with double barrel shotguns hanging on the walls. It doens't work like that over here. Guns are literally part of the fabric of existence in this place. Get that through your European mind. The right of a citizen of the United States to own a gun is LITERALLY FUCKING SETTLED LAW.
If the US had the population of Australia, had maybe 200,000 guns, a secure border, and no second amendment, and no ingrained gun culture, yeah, you might be able to get some kind of measureable gun control to work. Guess what? None of that is true. WE AREN'T THE REST OF THE WORLD AND DON'T WANT TO BE
It shows with your crying on all caps like a skitzo boomer every time someone shits on america
1 year ago
Anonymous
The fact that you spend all day every day on a fucking American website filled with Americans talking about America really drives home that you don't care about America.
>Gun control works in every single developed country
How do you figure?
The UK passed their big ban in 1997 and then proceeded to have mass shootings, one in 2011 and one last year in 2021.
The thing is, they UK has always been generally less violent than the US, because even before the ban they were only getting like one mass shooting a decade before, and they're still getting about one mass shooting a decade afterward either.
Hell, the homicide rate went up after the 1997 ban.
Guess what? The police have no duty to protect you. Guess who decided that? The Supreme Court. There is no police reform, as it is settled. There is no stopping this violence either, as nigs exist and there are north of 500 million guns in the US. The only thing you are going to do by trying to pass any kind of gun control is cement republican control over the house and senate, and inconvinience some grandma trying to buy a revolver or harmless gun enthusiast who wants to follow the law to a T. That's it. That's all it will do.
>The police have no duty to protect you. Guess who decided that? The Supreme Court
And perhaps we should change the laws and constitution so that it is part of their job. The fact that conservatives keep defending this type of shit and refusing to admit something is wrong with the police is the problem.
The police are fucking gays and should have no power at all. You're literally arguing that we should totally change massive aspects of society by completely changing the police (somehow, never heard specifics on this) and then rely on them totally for protection for the rest of our lives. Do you seriously think that could even happen in the first place? Think about this logically.
>And perhaps we should change the laws and constitution
Good fucking luck. I wish the police were different, but it's the reality we live in. Trying to disarm otherwise defenseless citizens in the midst of such unrest, broken policing, and violent crime is going to do nothing but make things worse here. We aren't like Europe where every gun is registerd and only farmers own them, it's a far different landscape in the US.
>And perhaps we should change the laws and constitution >An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification.
How do you propose that be done when the dems controlling two branches couldn't do this?
>>WOAH WOAH WOAH YOU WANT US TO STOP THAT SHOOTER? HE HAS A GUN?!?!?!
I don't understand, is this supposed to be the cops saying this or pro-gun parents? I'm confused.
You don't even understand your own posts because they don't mean anything. How do you take yourself seriously and think that you should be telling other people how to live?
>Literally ad hominem shit
You have no argument whatsoever because you are fundamentally wrong. You have nothing and you are nothing. Now retreat back to your echochamber so you can have your braindead ideas reenforced again.
"Good guys with guns" HAVE stopped countless attacks, murders and even attempted mass-shootings. That isn't up for debate. It's a documented thing that has happened.
Also is this the new epic meme-image the retarded Commutrannies on LeftyPol came up with to totally BTFO the evil "chuds" again between dilation-sessions and masturbating to Pampers commercials? Naturally it doesn't even look like anyone and is a product of ther schizo shit that only exists in your head. And it only took you 2.5 years of collective effort to come up with, kek.
Although I guess basing it off nobody/nothing real prevents you from accidentally basing your "anti-4chan memes" on a an anti-Capitalist half-Hispanic half-garden gnome Registered Democrat raised by a single anti-Christian New Age Kabbalist father like you did with your last one, kek.
It's fucking staggering how much the Left CAN'T meme.
>"Good guys with guns" HAVE stopped countless attacks, murders and even attempted mass-shootings. That isn't up for debate. It's a documented thing that has happened
A black person became president and vice president. Cherry picking is fun
>"Good guys with guns" HAVE stopped countless attacks, murders and even attempted mass-shootings. That isn't up for debate. It's a documented thing that has happened. >Also is this the new epic meme-image the retarded Commutrannies on LeftyPol came up with to totally BTFO the evil "chuds" again between dilation-sessions and masturbating to Pampers commercials? Naturally it doesn't even look like anyone and is a product of ther schizo shit that only exists in your head. And it only took you 2.5 years of collective effort to come up with, kek. >Although I guess basing it off nobody/nothing real prevents you from accidentally basing your "anti-4chan memes" on a an anti-Capitalist half-Hispanic half-garden gnome Registered Democrat raised by a single anti-Christian New Age Kabbalist father like you did with your last one, kek. >It's fucking staggering how much the Left CAN'T meme.
>Also is this the new epic meme-image the retarded Commutrannies on LeftyPol came up with to totally BTFO the evil "chuds" again between dilation-sessions and masturbating to Pampers commercials? Naturally it doesn't even look like anyone and is a product of ther schizo shit that only exists in your head. And it only took you 2.5 years of collective effort to come up with, kek. >Although I guess basing it off nobody/nothing real prevents you from accidentally basing your "anti-4chan memes" on a an anti-Capitalist half-Hispanic half-garden gnome Registered Democrat raised by a single anti-Christian New Age Kabbalist father like you did with your last one, kek. >It's fucking staggering how much the Left CAN'T meme
This is a shitpost, but people who track the data don't include mass shootings stopped by someone shooting the gunman before a mass casualty event just be definition.
It's literally all inner city blacks. That's like saying Italy has a high rate of pick pockets, when literally 99% of them are gypsies that everyone hates. It's brutal to admit, but it doesn't effect 'regular people'.
They didn't used to be like that though. Democrats unironically poisoned the institution over two decades with "anti-racist" policies, lower-quality standards to be more inclusive and ruining their lives for doing their jobs with BLM shit.
Nowadays I don't blame cops for not actively confronting a shooter. Why would they? What if the shooter isn't white (which is statistically always the most likely case)? They could do everything they're supposed to and rescue everyone like a real super cop and the Media will STILL ruin their lives over it.
I always thought it was funny when anti gun tards tell me that the police are going to go door to door and confiscate weapons. It's like they don't realize that cops and military are the biggest gun enthusiasts of all.
It's more likely that the police that come and confiscate my guns will see a gun of mine they like and invite me to the range to go shoot with them. I had a former SWAT sharpshooter help me zero in my new Savage the other day. These people aren't going to confiscate weapons from normal white people. They don't want to.
>If I say it it must be true
What does "white culture" revolve around in your country? Cucking for your government? How many brown dicks you can fit in your mouth?
I am not white, I am an Asian American. Asians in America have the lowest rate of gun ownership but we also have the lowest rate of victimization. White people in this country are obsessed with guns because they have no identity..
Lol yeah remember during the LA Riots all the Asian store-owners didn't need stinky old white people shit like "guns" to defend their homes, businesses and families? They just fought them off by lying still in meditation and projecting "cultural solidarity" at the nogs.
Those "roof Koreans" ended up shooting one of their own. What Koreans learned from the LA riots was that they needed to be politically active so that they can advocate for themselves in this racist country and that they need to do better outreach towards Black people and other communities. It wasn't that they needed to stay armed like the racist white incels on this board project onto them.
>and that they need to do better outreach towards Black people and other communities.
Yeah, they did some outreach with bolt action rifles during the riots.
>It wasn't that they needed to stay armed
Yes it was. They would have all been beaten and killed if they hadn't been.
1 year ago
Anonymous
The only Korean American killed during the riots was Jung Hui Lee, who was shot by the roof Koreans
1 year ago
Anonymous
*Edward Song Lee
1 year ago
Anonymous
Yes? Because they were armed.
If they weren't armed there would have been a lot more deaths, let me tell you.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>The only Korean American killed
Why the fuck do you think he was the only one? Because the rest of them had guns, you fucking idiot.
Stop trying to emasculate and disempower small asian communities you authoritarian shithead. A lot of them left dicatorships in China and Korea to get away from that shit, and your dumb liberal ass is trying to bring it back to them. They want nothing to do with it. Fucking quit.
>one guy killed by friendly fire
Well that proves it. Asians shouldn't have guns and clearly don't need them. In the next chimp-out they will defend their homes and families and businesses with magically non-lethal kung-fu.
This is some of the most laughable SJW drivel I have ever seen posted unironically.
I don't even know where to start.
I think the best part is you unironically trying to paint Asians as "not racist", or even "less racist than white people".
1 year ago
Anonymous
You can listen to the interviews with the Korean American community leaders who were there during Saigu. They said the same thing. For example:
1 year ago
Anonymous
>some non-elected rando makes an extremely PC speech
Yeah, totally something that represents the feelings of the average working Joe.
Even if it did you're still objectively wrong AND laughably stupid. "Reaching out" to blacks, whatever the fuck that even means, is not going to protect you during a chimp-out. Guns will. And an IRL event like the LA Riots proved it to literally everyone.
You're wrong and your squealing impotent hatred of whites (who graciously let you or your ancestors into the country in the first place) is fucking hilarious.
1 year ago
Anonymous
White people did not willingly let Asians into the country. They passed Chinese and Japanese exclusion acts against us. If Asians didn't ride the coat tails of the Black civil rights movement, we still wouldn't have any rights in this country
1 year ago
Anonymous
>They passed Chinese and Japanese exclusion acts against us.
Yes? And then white people overturned and appealed those, and graciously let you into their country.
How are those acts relevant in any way of you're here in my country? If they were active you wouldn't be here.
>and that they need to do better outreach towards Black people
*WHEEZE*
Yes, that's what stops you from having your store looted, your business destroyed and your family murdered, not guns. The marauding nogs out for plunder and blood will TOTALLY care you fellated BLM online, or even KNOW that you did before they loot your store and gang-rape your wife.
I mean sucks for that guy but im sure the weapons they had were a good enough deterrent so more werent maimed or killed but thats just speculation. Plus youbcan be "politically" active and not disarm yourselves like a bunch of pussies hwite populations both past and present have managed to do so
>they have no identity
Projection that means nothing.
Non-whites literally grasp at ANY straw they can to shit-talk white people because they have nothing BUT "straws".
>White people d-don't have no "cultural identity".... >White people don't s-Hispanice they food.... >White people care about s-space and robots too much....
>but we also have the lowest rate of victimization
Wait I thought we were in an EPIDEMIC of Asian-targeted Hate Crimes, all perpetrated by white right-wing "incels" of course.
Was that a lie? I heard nothing but how much you guys are "victims" for like 18 months.
In the US, this is literally true on a legal level.
The constitution is not freedoms granted by the government, it is a document that simply recognizes liberties that God has already granted. Then, the Supreme Court reafirmed the right of the people to keep and bear arms in 2008. It is quite literally a God given right in the United States.
>The constitution is not freedoms granted by the government, it is a document that simply recognizes liberties that God has already granted.
Uh, bro? >We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Where's God mentioned in there?
I'm 20yo and they don't let us get guns here in Florida until we're 21 (Parkland "think of the children!"). What should be the first gun that I get once I turn 21? I was thinking probably a pistol so I could take it with me throughout the day.
>What should be the first gun that I get once I turn 21?
Really a what are you looking for kinda question. With most answers being what works best is preference.
It's cliche, but getting a good solid AR15 is never a bad choice. Daniel Defense, Colt, LMT, Knights Armament, Griffin Armament, FN, and many others make really solid rifles. Be sure to familiarize yourself with the rules of firearms safety if you haven't already.
If you go for a handgun, it's best not to be brand loyal, instead get one that fits your hands the best and that you can reach all the controls without shifting your grip.
uh, wut? LMT didn't exist when those movies were made, and no one in them used a Piston AR with a monolithic handguard. I want one to avoid rail tilt and because I don't have a piston AR yet.
accelerate bros
I'm totally not a basement dwelling virgin.
I totally didn't spend $1000+ on this AR15 because I made it my political identity.
I bought it because I need to defend myself against moronS.
Yes I might shoot it once a year at a gun range
but you don't get it, I need this to defend against the tyrannical government and moronS!
Your mind is corrupted by ZOG. The day of the rope is coming and soon I won't have to see trannies in my favorite star wars™™ show anymore. I am an aryan warrior. My favorite politician (he's /ourguy/, one of the good ones) told me that the LIBTARDS wanna take my guns away and put my kids in GAY bathrooms. I've never been in a fight, and avoid conflict at every turn, but if a glowie moron wants to take away my guns I'm going to start a CIVIL WAR. Happening now! Accelerate!
YOU. AREN'T. GONNA. REPLACE. ME.
>chud >chud >chud
anyone that disagrees with me is a chud
I am a based and redpilled aryan warrior, and I am armed!
Can I get a job? No.
Can I get a girlfriend? No.
Can I defend myself in any fight whatsoever? No.
BUT
I am going to defend my right to carry a firearm! I love violence and murder despite having no real experience with it! /accelerate/
Based NRA, based right wing politicians telling me what to do and how to vote, they are /ourguys/
I fucking LOVE Tucker
based 4chan!
I love 4chan contaminating other boards!
I'm not 16, I promise!
disagreeing with my political philosophy?
you must be a chud zog agent!
tucker told me you are trying to replace me!
my favorite republican senator told me you want my child to know that gay people exist and that I should vote for him, so you should have a nice day!
How many are for robbery, rape, drug dealing, murder, fraud, embezzlement, child-molestation, etc., and how many are for hurting a Feminist or Muslim's feelings on Twitter?
>OMG THE THIRD MOST POPULOUS NATIOB ON THE PLANET AND THE ONLY ONE IN THE TOP THREE WITH AN ACTUAL WORKING JUSTICE SYSTEM AND TRUSTWORTHY STATS HAS A NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN PRISON GREATER THAN MY EUROTRASH ARMPIT OF A COUNTRY THE SIZE OF A US STATE???????? OMG I AM GOING INSAAAAAAAAAAAAAANE!!!!!! MY TINY LITTLE APE-LIKE EURO-BRAIN CAN'T HAAAAAAANDLE IIIIIIIIIIIIT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!
>can we make it a little bit harder for people to purchase ar's please? thank you >MY FREEDOM IS UNDER ATTACK THIS 18 YO MENTALLY CHALLENGED BOY THAT THINKS HE'S A WOMAN CAN'T DEFEND HIMSELF FROM BULLIES AT SCHOOL NOW
I never get how the fudds and retards have the loudest voice in the gun debate
literally every healthy minded person in america agrees that more thorough background checks and procedures before buying certain guns would be the best thing to do
>some dipshit millionaire from a gated community surrounded by armed security has a sub zero hottake on why the government and people like him should have more power over the peasantry
The president should be someone that realizes guns weren't a problem 50 years ago before American society was subverted by "progressives."
yeah
we know that
they became a problem when these
became the norm
You could buy full auto guns before…. A lot less school shootings than now…
>became the norm
You better believe it, gay. They are REALLY fucking common and there isn't a single fucking thing you or anyone else can do about it. The supreme court ruled on this in 2008 in DC vs. Heller. The individual has the right to keep any weapon in common use for lawful purposes. It's fucking settled.
>totally baffllig to the rest of the world
Guess what? The United States isn't the rest of the world, and isn't bound by the laws, cultures, and traditions of the rest of the world. The US was founded on RABID individualism, self preservation, and individual freedom, and the gun is the physical manifestation of those ideals. Gun culture is literally fucking HAMMERED into the fabric of the ways this country thinks and operates. You are never, ever going to change it.
So the existence of better firearms made people want to kill more?
no
They made them more effective
So the problem osnt actually the guns themselves. Thanks for clarifying
that depends on your definition of efficency
Anon you should look up when the AR-15 was invented. Hint it was more than 50 years ago.
not in its current form
and it was not the norm 50 years ago
Don't elect TV people. It never works out.
Reagan literally the greatest president.
He was shit and the nation has never recovered from the debt he caused.
What a numbskull. Prob a bitter AIDS ridden homersexual
the guy who gave amnesty to all mudslims, and subsequently allowed the democrats to own the house forever? Yeah right.
KEK, how those Reagnomics working out for you? Reagan was the beginning of the end. We used to have great Presidents before him. Reagan opened up the floodgates for hacks.
America hasn't had a halfway decent president since Eisenhower
This.
He literally had dementia for 1/3rd of his time in office. Nancy was our first female President. He wouldn't understand a question and she would whisper into his ear and he would answer. He was a bumbling, senile, moron. Nancy Reagan was always staunchly pro-life until Ronnie got Alzheimer, then she became a vocal advocate of stem cell research.
Andrew Jackson is the greatest president
Reagen might honestly be the worst president we have ever had. Him and his dumbass boomer followers are what doomed America.
Sounds like every president you had in last half a century is a worst president
Nope. They have all been pretty shit for the most part, but I'd say Reagan is the worst of the past 50 years at the least.
Reagan was worse than blumpf? No way
>Worse than Carter, LBJ, both Bushes, Obongo, and Brandon
lmao I'll give you second term Reagan wasn't great but you're retarded
>Say it with me now.
>President McConaughey.
That's the idea. Another globalist puppet president for your fake American elections.
>Reagan literally the greatest president.
Fucking retard
If you think a fascist will work out in your favor, you're a dumb fuck
Dishonest, two-faced big government teet suckler. A common theme among neocons.
maybe if you love Hispanics and hobos and not having guns
Didnt drumpf get more votes from all minorities the second time and lost because of whites?
Lol. He is the reason why our economy sucks in this day and age
like electing pollitician works out great
politicians are TV people dumbfuck
Lol America was objectively better under Trump, a "reality TV star", than under Biden, a career politician.
Uhh no. America has been a shit hole under BOTH Trump and Biden, neither of them have a clue what they're doing.
Under Trump taxes were lower, gas prices were lower, fuel prices were lower, illegal immigration was lower, inflation wasn't out of control, crime was lower, there wasn't a mass shooting every week, a literal chud wasn't running the Health branch, official White House staff were not disseminating literal anti-cop fake news to the public on social media, CRT was banned in military training and Russia wasn't invading other countries.
>there wasn't a mass shooting every week
lmao
But there wasn't though.
Your Mother Jones stats that count a drug deal going bad within 30 miles of a school as a "school shooting" are not valid.
kek
Makes me believe in fascism all the more.
Fascists are just as gun-grabby as modern Democrats.
If you aren't bearing a gun in defense of the fatherland then you don't need one.
I see no problem with this. The US is the way it is because of libertarianism.
I want you to be hung upside down by your one leg and shot in the head while you dangle
>If you aren't bearing a gun in defense of the fatherland then you don't need one.
Nah, fuck off, we need them to defend ourselves, our families, our homes, our property, etc., because ghe government has proven invariably that it is unable or often just outright unwilling to do it for us.
Fuck you, grabby. Go get mugged or raped or something.
alt right alt right alt right
Based. Time to teach those guncels a lesson.
Do as I say, not as I do
Movies are make believe
just like shootings that happen days before elections in celebrity home towns
Movie guns are just real guns wiht fake bullets.
ok alec go to bed
The issue is that he's being paid millions to make what is essentially "pro-fun propaganda", dipshits.
Are you being disengenuous and attacking a Strawman? Or are you legitimately so stupid that that point went over your head? Lol imagine getting intellectually filtered by fucking Brietbart.
>what is essentially "pro-fun propaganda",
Showing using guns isn't pro-gun propaganda. Especially if you're playing a cop or a hitman
>Showing using guns isn't pro-gun propaganda.
Yeah, it pretty much is. Even most Democrats think so.
Tell that to alec baldwin
too soon anon....
Guns aren't real you retard
>breitfart
retard
Someone tell Breitbart movies aren’t real life.
They should've said he had armed security or own guns IRL, but if course journalists are fucking retards.
>B-b-but muh hypocrisy!!!
The fact that you want to normalize kids getting murdered like this as just part of life so that you can keep feeling like a big boy when you own dozens of guns as a penis enlarger is very, very, very sad and sick.
>media doesn't influence kids into violence!
>this actor doesn't like guns?! but he USED a prop gun in a movie!
I hate this argument because it's basically 'we agree firearms are bad and he's a bad man for having supported them in the?past'
This doesn't work on liberals. They don't care they are hypocrites. They DO NOT CARE. They just want guns taken away. They wouldn't care if the NRA or fucking the Las Vegas killer did it.
Youre deliberately sliding your own argument to be more like them.
>Y-y-yeah guns are bad and he's a bad g-g-gun person.
Guns are literally the only check on a tyrannical government. Literally the only. The only third option is some other nation coming in and killing them and guess what the only nation doing that is USA. Chinks wouldn't give two fucks as long as you pay $2 led paint lined toys for your kids form them.
SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.
>LET MORE CHILDREN DIE
Yes, yes, we know you are psychos.
gun control doesnt mean you arent allowed to have guns
thats exactly what it means
No, it doesn't. What do uou think a well regulated means? Or is that part of the 2nd amendment too hard to read due to how much blood and jizz from gun nuts has been plastered on it?
It meant for a permanent militia run by civilians to be active to keep an out of control government in check
Are you part of a well regulated militia? Or are you just a flag wearing dipshit who thinks owning fifty guns makes you Rambo?
Why do you keep building strawmen in your head?
I love how Twittertrannies can't argue so they have to resort to ad homs based on nonexistent stereotypes, such as "if u like gun u have small penis lololololol".
It's not a strawman, it's clear part of American culture to compensate your sense of lack of manhood via gun ownership.
>It's not a strawman, it's clear part of American culture to compensate your sense of lack of manhood via gun ownership.
Got a problem with that, chud?
> implying leftist trannies are bastions of masculinity
Lol
No, it's literally just projection on your part.
Doubly so considering Leftists have been clinically and scientifically proven over and over again to have higher Estrogen and be less masculine, less fit, less healthy and less conventionally attractive on average than rightwingers.
Can't help but notice you have zero actual evidence that guns are "to compensate for a tiny penis" or whatever drivel you believe.
Bruh, you are way, WAY behind on the times.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
This is settled precident. The Militia, being well regulated (In good working order) is every able bodied male aged 18-45 in the USA.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246
A well regulated Militia is one thing: YOU. Therefor, you have the right to keep and bear arms. Simple as. This is settled and done as far as the law is concerned.
>What do uou think a well regulated means?
Whatever I interpret it as, since it's a nebulous, subjective qualifier.
Regulate the militia all you want. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Militia =/= The people, or do you think the 1st Amendment only applies to churches and the press?
Interesting take, but it's not exactly correct. A modern wording for the Amendment would be something like this:
In order for the people to effectively operate a militia, they have the right to keep and bear arms.
Or something like that. The militia is the people, and in order to keep the militia up to snuff, the people have the right to own guns. This is how modern law and the Supreme Court sees it.
It seems to me like if they wanted the 2nd to be a right of the militia, they would have just said "The right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
To me, the fact they have a split between militia and people means they aren't exactly the same thing.
I found it sort of a dumb argument when they were coming up with shit in the 1934 NFA because of just saying "Well, this gun has no purpose in a militia", which, sure it would, what self respecting militia force wouldn't see the utility in having a machine gun, or suppressors if we're thinking in terms of them actually engaging some enemy in combat? Or SBRs, which obviously most of the military uses, so clearly there's a clear utility for it in any armed conflict, or even that short barreled shotgun at the center of it.
It was just a bunch of BS, and the whole case was funky because they didn't even let the defendent side say anything before making their decision.
It was a bunch of bullshit they pulled out of their asses and didn't allow arguments against it.
>What do uou think a well regulated means?
It means 'in good working order.' As in proficient and practiced. As in 'not the Russian army.'
Gin Control means whatever gun-grabbers want/need it to mean at the time. That's WHY it's a nebulous term with no fixed definition.
>gun control doesnt mean you arent allowed to have guns
Depends on what gun control you're talking about.
You're talking like universal background checks, sure.
Assault weapons ban by definition takes guns from people.
If tomorrow they announced that they were going to put a total freeze on all Playstations and make them illegal unless you owned one already and even as Japan got PS6-10, you'll be jailed for even trying to get one, you'd all be screaming that they're taking video games away, and you'd be right.
Or if they suddenly said they were banning everyone from owning pick up trucks unless they had one already, but no more Ford F-150s if you didn't have one you're SOL, you'd say they're taking away your trucks.
That is the literal fucking definition.
This reminds me of when Fox News had a meltdown over Bradley Cooper being at some democratic event after he played a consertative in American Sniper. They were like. WHY IS HE THERE, HE'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE THERE! Before that they were literally in love with him.
>there are actually people on this board that think breitbart is a credible news source
that’s such a piss weak take
>imfdb
Hey, that place is cool.
is it bad quality or does he look like shit?
imagine trying to push gun control after these past two insane years
This. Even bleeding heart liberals have stocked up over the moronmania or the possibility of another, worse massive government overreach and possible rounding up people for """"quarantine """"
They're too arrogant.
all right all right alight alight
I can't take his voice seriously
There was a thing were people wanted him to run for govner of texas but he declined, he probably would have won too, unlike that gay beto
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/379301502/
this is a fucking joke and this gay is a fucking clown
I remember when Obama used Jack Black to promote his Iran. That was retarded too.
This is the worst True Detective season yet
They're not even the same color lmao these people are sociopaths
>Tell me about the shoes, what did they smell like?
Pre-teen spirit
after 2020 we will literally never give up our guns. America is ready for war
a buncha kids moved on?
kek
alright I actually lol'd
...to realize that all your life–you know, all your love, all your hate, all your memories, all your pain–it was all the same thing. It was all the same dream, a dream that you had inside a locked room, a dream about being a President.
were there school shootings in us before 90s?
the rise of the internet, smartphones, and mass surveillance had encouraged psychopaths to go on mass shootings instead of becoming serial killers.
A simpler answer would be antidepressants.
I shot tons of loads to Ferris Beulers GF
isolated schizos, sure, but the current trend, like everything else wrong (socially) in the country, is entirely manufactured by aggressive 24/7 news-as-entertainment coverage. we're so far gone that profiting on the lives of children in third world countries isn't enough to sate our entertainment-industrial complex. to increase revenue further, they've moved to something just short of BEGGING fringe psychos to give them something to report about by implicitly offering to make them famous.
oddly a post i kinda agree with
You haven't realized that the media intentionally promotes mass shooters and turns them into celebrities to instigate mass shootings? Don't you remember when the Joker movie was coming out and the journos were practically BEGGING someone to commit a shooting at a theater playing Joker? How have you not figured this out yet? When the New Zeeland shooting happened, every New Zealand news outlet blurred Tarrant's face and didn't mention his name because it is common fucking sense you don't give these monsters attention. The media knows this and causes children to die for money. It's so obvious.
No shit.
>Hey do you still if your dead daughter's shoes? I want to bring them to a press conference so I can help create publicity for my husband.
template
Thanks
he looked so fake, from his fake hair to the scripted talking points with. he should be ashamed and go home and an extra large dose of pey ote
They are insane if they think anyone is giving them up. The cops literally taser parents who wanted to go in and save their kids in that school while NINETEEN pigs stood down for an hour while the shooter did whatever the fuck he pleased
That and standing idly by while morons and degenerate criminals burned down cities and people's livelihood all summer because they themselves kneeled on a morons neck while he overdosed for 20 minutes
Maybe if they weren't so fucking incompetent there could be some trust and assurance but not now. All this shit says to anyone paying attention is there will be no one to protect you when the horses come except for yourself
but what about my thin blue line? punisherman save me!
Nazi Germany did it, Australia did it. You underestimate the power of the Military. This isn't back when we had bayonets.
The US isn't some shitty little island that is 90% uninhabited or a tiny ass European country. Fuck, the states run themselves like countries. There will be a succession and a civil war before people willingly disarm themselves, and they will have the backing of most of the men in the military and police when they do it.
I don't think a lot of people in this thread really comprehend just how out of the realm of reality getting any kind of federal gun control is.
It literally won't happen. In 2012, you had a Democratic president, a Democratic senate, and a Democratic House. An entire classroom of Kindergarteners were killed. Obama put forth the most inneffective, lukewarm, watered down, do nothing gun control bill ever concieved. IT DIDN'T EVEN GET CLOSE TO MAKING IT TO A VOTE IN THE SENATE BEFORE IT DIED. It literally never got close to getting voted on, let alone passed. And it was a bill that was so useless it didn't even have anything to do with how the Sandy Hook shooter got his gun.
You have to get SIXTY votes in the senate to pass gun bills. SIXTY. I don't think I need to tell you guys how literally impossible that is in todays enviornment.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/senate-democrats-resigned-not-being-able-pass-gun-legislation/
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/25/politics/gun-laws-us-congress/index.html
You have ZERO chance of ever getting anything even close to resembling gun control through the government. It literally isn't going to happen. All Obama's bill did was slightly enhance background checks, and it got crushed immediately in a senate that was friendly to him. And you think you are actually going to see a weapon as common as the AR-15 legislated against? Don't make me laugh.
The AR-15 is easily the most common and ubiquitous rifle in the US. There are far, FAR more guns in the US than people. It's somewhere north of half a billion guns, but we honestly don't know as there is no gun registration in the US.
There are more AR-15 rifles in the US than there are people in any single European country.
And guess what? If they did somehow do something about AR type rifles, the supreme court has already ruled that arms "in common use" are protected without question. Guess which firearm is the most commonly used today?
>needing something like that to go through congress
kids are dying for christ's sake
Now I know you're trolling. Yes, laws go through fucking congress. Are you dense?
It doesn't even matter, you aren't getting gun control or any kind of reduction of AR rifles anyways. AR types rifles have absolutely exploded in popularity in the past 20 years, more so than I can stress through words. This weapon platform is effectively hammered into the fabric of the country at this point.
Pic related, it's what the average gun store looks like in the US. Keep in mind gun stores like this are usually packed with people buying rifles like this, 6 days a week, 52 weeks a year.
The ship on gun control in the United States has not only sailed, it is far past the horizon. It isn't happening.
It is incromphensible, I mean totally totally baffllig to the rest of the world why those shouild be sold in such numbers to normal people
Can you not see how insane this is ?
The rest of the world is insane to me. But that's the beauty of diversity, our countries are different and that's OK!
Secretly deep down you must think to yourselves
I should not be allowed to own one of these
I have no real use for it and it is just posturing
It always amuses me when I hear people's opinions on guns and it's clear they've never used one in their entire lives.
>I should not be allowed to own one of these
A reasonable person doesn't want their own individual rights taken away. Why would you ever want that? You are kneecapping yourself for a false sense of safety. You are out of your fucking mind.
What I should or shouldn't be allowed to own is literally irrelevant, as it is recognized as a God given right in the United States. There is no justification involved in ownership of guns here.
and how exactly is owing one of those going to maintain your rights?
it will only lead to esclation and your death
Do you have any idea who the biggest group of gun enthuiests are in the United States? Clearly you don't, I'm starting to think you aren't American and don't know any gun owners based on how flat out clueless your questions are.
Protip: most gun owners are Police Officers, family of Police Officers, Military, and Retired military. Go walk in any gun store. Most of the staff is going to be active or retired Military 90% of the time.
Why would you ever assume that the people who do the heavy lifting for the government wouldn't also participate in and appreciate their God given rights to bear arms? They enjoy their constitutional rights just as much as everyone else. In my state (Tennessee) the State government has already declared they won't recognize any gun confiscation and would actively tell people not to turn in their guns. Try again, fool.
>and how exactly is owing one of those going to maintain your rights?
>How would the garden gnomes being heavily armed and supplied have prevented the Holocaust?
Well I'm not a cuck, so no.
Nope
I think the opposite
I think that committing practical mutiny should be a right to all people around the world, and thus, ever civilian should have access to the same and even more powerful weapons than the strongest militaries.
whilst it is a noble thought I can only see such a world view ultimately leading to many waco type situations
we'd still be ruled by roman catholic priests if not for it. and they'd be busy having orgies and raping little boys in the courtrooms while you could do nothing about it.
When did Roman Catholic priests rule America?
This
Can you not see how insane it is literally putting people in jail for tweeting about Islam?
OF course
those views are not mutually exclusive
You can shit on muslimes all you want in my country
>the rest of the world
Who? Those people that never stop flooding our side of the internet and yapping their samey boring shit? That follow us site after site and then pretend like they aren’t following? Cannot ever care, outsiders are filler.
>why those shouild be sold in such numbers to normal people
Because that's what guns are now, they got better. Better design, more modular, more accurate, intutitive, ect.
It'd be like saying people can't buy pistols, only revolvers because you insist they should be stuck with 1850s tech despite never applying that standard to anything else, you want to ban Glocks because they're 'too good' in your opinion and you don't care about any reason why someone might not want to still be using a Colt Single Action Army or something.
yes
they are designed for one thing
to kill as many people in the shortest time possible
and wow what could possible go wrong
with this model of gun ownership
Don't you have some pakis to get beheaded by? Why do you cuck fucking third worlders always butt in and think anyone here gives a fuck what you think?
Why do you think europe is a single country?
He doesn't. But if you don't collectivize them you're individually too small to matter.
Many of your countries have a smaller, less relevant economy than the state of Alabama.
I dont think economy of alabama is relevant anywhere outside of us, while individual eu countries can have some economical connections to entire world via selling some niche stuff
>they are designed for one thing
>to kill as many people in the shortest time possible
Nah, they're designed to put accurate shots quickly downrange or on target. It could be used for many reasons beyond just people killing if you're not a psycho path. It can be used for self defense, sport, or hunting.
It's like saying "The only thing a car is good for is running people over" after Waukesha, clearly ignoring the millions of people who do no such thing with their cars and clearly have other utility for them. Same here, there's tens of millions of people with AR-15s that never are used in anger either except against paper or steel targets.
>they are designed for one thing
>to kill as many people in the shortest time possible
That's weird because most shots fired from a gun never kill anyone.
Dumb gay gay from an irrelevant poor country.
Shut up.
Reddit invasion in 2016.
The rest of the world is dominated almost totally by the United States.
>It is incromphensible, I mean totally totally baffllig to the rest of the world why those shouild be sold in such numbers to normal people
>Can you not see how insane this is ?
Why would the rest of the world ban normal people from owning an essential tool? That sounds a lot more insane.
Compare America's homicide rates to Europe, Japan, Canada etc
London is a violent shithole.
A "violent shithole" whose homicide rates are lower than any major city in America
>A "violent shithole" whose homicide rates are lower than any major city in America
Then why is it still worse than most of them?
Ban cities
Ah yes, clearly the common thread here is guns.
Not an additional factor that you and your ilk don't want to mention.
Wow something in common those cities all have. Democrat run hellholes and, say it with me
N
What is ESSENTIAL about a AR15?
apart from can pretend you are rambo on the firing range
>What is ESSENTIAL about a AR15?
What's essential about air conditioning?
Good analogy
It would be like living in a small house with a very mild climate but having the conditioning unit of a small office block
>It would be like living in a small house with a very mild climate but having the conditioning unit of a small office block
I need it to cool my mining rig dummy
There is nothing about the word essential anywhere in US federal gun law or the constitution. The AR15 is in common use, therefor it is protected. Rights do not have to be explained to justified.
What is ESSENTIAL about Pride parades?
>What is ESSENTIAL about a AR15?
Low recoil, highly modular, ease of use, many people like the familiarity of it because it's a weapon people have had for 50 years now and many know it, it's accurate, easy to put attachments on like foregrips and scopes/red dots, ergonomic, and all in one package.
I see
I do get it and I will admit that i am clueless when it comes to guns
but to me it just seems like it is a machine gun in disguise, which are regulated.
>but to me it just seems like it is a machine gun in disguise, which are regulated
Machine gun= pull trigger and it fires till you let go
Seni-auto which the AR15 is= pull trigger and one bullet fires until you pull again
>but to me it just seems like it is a machine gun in disguise
I have 6 of them in my gun case right now. Take it from me, it isn't. They are functionally different. The M16 and M4 Carbine (the fully automatic machine gun versions) have different internal diameters of the reciever, a whole other pin through the reciever, and several machine gun only parts that make them function different. The AR-15 is only capable of Semi Automatic fire. Think the kind of fire you would imagine from a hand gun- One pull of the trigger, one bullet. That's what the AR15 does. The M16/M4 are capable of firing the entire magazine of ammo with a single trigger pull, or a 3 round burst fire, depending on the model. The AR-15 does not have the parts to fire like that.
>but to me it just seems like it is a machine gun in disguise
Just because something looks the same doesn't mean it is the same, like two computers could have the same case but different internals, or two cars look alike but one's a manual diesel and the other one is an automatic gas.
Obviously the big difference is the fact that one has the ability to fire in full auto, not just rapid for a person with a fast finger but that actual 800-900 RPM rate that comes with an autosear and fire selector if needed.
But I mean, while the AR-15 is very similar to an M4 with a few missing features and altered internals to make it semi auto only, take by comparision, the M9 and the Berreta 92, which is legal to own, and literally has no actual features or capabilities that I know of that make it any different from the military M9, but there's no accusation that 9mm semi auto is a weapon of war despite them being far closer.
Or even a hunting rifle like a Remington 700 is virtually the same gun as the M24 sniper rifle.
And to be completely fair, I find the regulation sort of marginal at best, since 1) Automatic fire is more for use with suppression and playing a bigger role in military scenarios where you're talking about sort of covering fire for flanks and tactical movements to take out or advance on an enemy than what a lone person is doing by themselves, followed up by a lot of soldiers don't use full auto and stick to semi auto anyway because it wastes bullets in combat when you'd rather put one or two well placed accurate shots on target instead of spray and pray, and if they switch to full auto, again, it's for suppression and covering fire so the fireteam or buddy can advance to a better shooting position, ect.
Full auto I feel is alright to be banned because it's so tied into that sort of thing where it's utility is really in that sort of fire and maneuver stuff, while bad guys can just spray and pray because they really don't care who gets hurt.
To follow up, just as a thought experiement, I've thought since the 2nd Amendment is an individual right, and some of the questions is where does the line lie for what should be allowed for the general populace, since shit like nukes or biological weapons I think are clear shouldn't be allowed.
I had the thought that perhaps it should be that it ensure it for anything considered an individual weapon, which would allow most of the common sense things to be out still, such as tanks, jets, ect since they're not individual weapons, they take crews and support systems with greater outsized externalities, ect.
You could go down to even apply this to machine guns since IIRC machine guns are also considered a crew served weapon and by this 'individual' standard, would not be allowed, but individual weapons like full auto M4s or AKs would be allowed.
Personally I'd also have a registration system, not even unprecedented. I mean, you have to register to vote, a core fundamental US right, so it's not that much to say it couldn't apply for a weapon either
>To follow up, just as a thought experiement, I've thought since the 2nd Amendment is an individual right, and some of the questions is where does the line lie for what should be allowed for the general populace, since shit like nukes or biological weapons I think are clear shouldn't be allowed
If you want to go by the founding fathers private citizens could own the most state of the art military equipment if you could afford it. The Supreme Court doesn't really keep to this though and the line has clearly been drawn.
Yeah, Biden's whole "You couldn't own a cannon back in the day" is really dumb because it's just a flat out lie that not even Politifact could try to cover him up from, you could, people could even buy/commission full on warships, like imagine if someone could just buy or make a modern cruiser or something.
But I think there's obviously got to be a point for practicality and I mean, you really can't just have anyone owning full on nuclear weapons and shit.
But the thought experiment was more for what would people think of, of the line being that individual weapons allowed vs crew and above ie actual Machine guns like the M240 and up banned since they're 'crew' and would require interpretation or influencing others beyond a person's individual right to utilize a crew served weapon system.
>you really can't just have anyone owning full on nuclear weapons and shit.
I've always like the idea that people should be able to own 'mass destructive' devices if they live far enough away from others and can secure them to keep them from being an accidental harm to their neighbors. If a man lives away from people, and is responsible in storage and care, he shouldn't be disallowed grenades or missles and the like.
I'm not sure you really can do that with weapons of mass destruction, I mean, it goes, even assuming no one gets caught in the initial blast, you have no control over the fallout and who that'll effect/kill once it's swept up in the wind and shit. Same with biological/chemical weapons, you just have zero control over it once you let it out, especially with a bio weapon since that could easily just jump from person to person in a way you couldn't possibly reasonably predict.
Even going down to like grenades, it's just too much collaterally. Even if you were to chuck a grenade at a baddie, all the fragmentation and shit can hurt and kill people way far away that you had no intention to because it's just a bomb and indescriminate. At least with a bullet you've got a much tighter degree of control about where it goes by aiming, and even then shit happens like overpenetration, happens all the time, like a few months ago that little 6 year old kid got killed because the police had to shoot some maniac and the bullet went through him through the wall and into her head. There's a balance that does need to be struck.
Weapon of mass destruction is kind of a fluid word that can mean several different things. Something like a missle is controlled, yet still has a radius of damage. Something like Chemical weapons or radiation are subject to wind and the environment, and therefor not nearly as controllable and probably wouldn't fall under 2nd Amendment protection. It could be argued that a grenade is controllable because you can choose where to throw it, and there is no more damage after the initial blast. Much like how you can direct gun fire, but can't control the bullet after it leaves the gun.
It's sort of a matter of degree, since like you control where the grenade goes, but you're sending out hundreds of bits of shrapnel in all directions, it operating on being less discriminant than a bullet since while you lose control of the bullet, the bullet tends to want to go in a particular direction due to momentum, and isn't doing like an AOE radius of damage of just whoever happens to exist around it when it goes off.
I mean it's like saying chemical weapons are controllable because you can determine where you set them off.
I don't see Weapons of Mass destruction as a fluid word, it's just shit that's been misused by the mainstream media since they're claiming anything they don't like is a WMD, they'll say a glock is a WMD.
WMD are really the big indiscriminate killers, namely nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, NBC=WMD to me, and everything else is conventional.
>Yeah, Biden's whole "You couldn't own a cannon back in the day" is really dumb because it's just a flat out lie that not even Politifact could try to cover him up from
On the contrary it looks like pundits told him to stop with it because outright lying harms your cause. More so when you are the president lying about US history.
Hasn't seemed to stop him much since he said that in his big Gun speech, as well as the "gun manufacturers are completely protected from liability unlike any other industry" which is a lie that's been told since that law passed in 2005, hell Hillary was saying it all the way up to the election in 2016 and Politifact even had to give her a false, but she kept saying it because it plays to the base, they don't care if it's true or not, they just want all guns gone and don't care how its done. Hell, Bernie made the mistake of being genuine and honest in one of the debates with her saying "It's not true, it only provides protection from lawsuits in the way you can't sue a hammer manufacturer if someone kills someone else with a hammer, or how you can't sue car and beer makers for people who kill someone if they drink and drive."
And the democratic/leftist base gutted him for saying what was an absolutely true fact.
Go bitch at Switzerland you fucking asshole.
buy a gun and blow your brains out
As President Trump said, take the guns first and go through the courts later.
You fail to realize the real reason why the government won't ban guns. Forget about kids being blsted. For the government is a big business. That's all. They don't care about your 2nd amendment. That's just another excuse. It's all about profit and nothing else.
Ah yes, the high-stakes high-profit world of firearms manufacture and metallic lathing. Truly the coke-trade of the 21st Century.
That retard has a point though. Since the office idiots do nothing to change things i wouldnt be surprised. And why would they care about our rights anyway?
>The AR-15 is easily the most common and ubiquitous rifle in the US.
I think this is big too on a constitutional level since one of those standards coming out from DC vs Heller was that it could only ban weapons that were dangerous and unusual weapons.
I mean, 1) You could argue easily all weapons are dangerous, so it'd really have to be something that is extremely or unusually dangerous, and that's hard to do with an AR-15 since doesn't have a particularly powerful round, many hunting rounds like .308 and 30-06 have two to three times the kinetic energy/power per shot, semi-auto guns and their fire rates have been common for 100 years in rifles, pistols and shotguns, and you can't claim the AR-15 is unusual when it's probably the most ubiquitous and common rifle around these days, and becoming more so by the day, especially if you include guns patterned on it but in different calibers like all the AR-10s and derivatives that exist for people wanting to shot .308.
It'd be like claiming a Ford F-150 is dangerous and unusual.
Those countries were both shit when that happened. Guns culture is a backbone of this nation's history. Best they are going to get is something like having AR-15s and AK-47s get a 21yo age limit federally or something like that. No way the US will be disarmed until the boomers and Gen Xers die out at least.
>having AR-15s and AK-47s get a 21yo age limit federally or something like that
I always laugh my ass off when politicians try to do this stupid shit. What exactly IS an AR15? A Sig Sauer MCX certainly isn't an AR15. Try to exchange parts between the two rifles and see what happens. It doesn't work. So there would be literally nothing stopping an 18 year old from just buying that rifle instead. If they banned every rifle by name, Gun manufacturers would make a rifle tomorrow that isn't on the list specifically for 18 year olds to buy. These are the dumbest, do nothing bullshit laws I've ever heard of.
An AR-15 is whatever they say it is, goy
There are more guns in Australia today then there were in 1996
obivous shoop
Alrightalrightalright.
>Someone DIED? QUICK, Burn the Constitution!
lmao, nope. You aren't getting gun control. I'm keeping all 6 of my AR15s. Cry about it.
Why 6 tho? 10 is the rule. You failed us.
This is the dumbest fucking thing I have ever seen. How do normalgays take this make-believe shit so seriously?
they are not meant to be the exact same shoe dumbo
just a style of shoe she likes
ie green converse
Well that is pretty stupid also.
I want to see a President Gary Busey and a Vice President Kathy Bates with Mel Gibson as our Secretary of State.
>
>*laughs* Sorry, I was remembering a, uh... a living child. A funny one. Not this one. Dead children are not funny.
Huh? What did he mean by this?
normalfags lapping this up are the most pathetic fucking wastes of oxygen. he's an ACTOR for fucks sake. he has been playing make believe for 30 years. like, no one is really this fucking naive right?
"What a great performance out there! Hey, afterwords do you want to go have some champagne in my 20 million dollar villa?"
Honestly I found MM pretty well balanced on the whole thing, most Hollywood types would have gone way harder on shit and been going the 2nd Amendment should be repealed or no one needs guns period, ect.
He didn't even go to an AWB or magazine ban, I think the biggest one he said was the raising it to 21, which I think is wrong but if he's stopping there it's pretty neat to see some moderation, and I think the framing is fine, I am sick of people abusing the 2nd and killing people and slowly fucking us all over.
lol
wait is he laughing or crying?
I can see why it would be more upsetting if it was your home town to knee jerk at this sort of thing. He's been hunting at a political career for a while though so this also gets his foot in the door.
YOU SOLD ME WOMEN'S GLASSES!
He's a very ugly man in desperate need of attention. Can't even dress well. Who goes to the white house without a fucking tie? How much more formal does it get than the white house
Hollywood actors who think they're too cool for ties, socks, and deoderant are gay
I wonder if McConaughey is aware just how much disdain the average person has for out of touch Hollywood actors who live in their own world coming down from Mt. Olympus to tell us to "do better" before shuffling off in their limousines
Something tells me he's "blissfully" ignorant.
Why dont liberals first demonstrate that gun reform would work by getting rid of all the illegal firearms?
>Democrats thinking they will be able to go ANYWHERE with "gun control" after Summer of Terror 2020
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
It's not happening, gays. You killed any argument for "gun control" for at least the next 20 years, maybe 30 years.
People watched while Democrats torched people's homes & businesses and murdered their families while Democrat DA's put perpetrators right back on the streets and Democrat Mayors told police to stand down and let it happen. People KNOW that you're disengenuous evil fucks that unironically want them and their families dead; AT LEAST the white ones. People KNOW they cant count on police or government actually protecting them anymore thanks to Denocrats. People KNOW they have to defend themselves and their families and their property now. You went to the trouble of proving it to them.
More than a million homes that never had firearms before purchased firearms in the months after you turned cities into one of the fucking Purge movies. In fact that's why I am looking forward to the inevitable next Democrat chimp-out. People are ready for you this time. We're going to see A LOT of fat, dead Communists with ventilated chests lying face down on people's lawns, irrigating their grass with high-Estrogen blood. I wonder if it will make the dandelions grow freakish bitch-tits and hang themselves afterwards? Lol.
GOVERN ME HARDER DADDY
THE POLICE WILL PROTECT ME, THATS THEIR JOB
There's nobody who lives within 100 miles of Austin Texas who isn't a gay
Haha shoota
>DEFUND THE POLICE! THEY ARE EVIL!
>GIVE YOUR GUNS TO THE POLICE! THEY WILL PROTECT YOU!
Getting some mixed signals here
The consistent theme is the consolidation of power into federal hands
I've noticed that also. Once shit hits the fan (and it will) I am with whomever goes against the feds.
Correct. The other consistent theme is ensuring that the innocent and law-abiding get fucking murdered during the next months-long Democrat chimp-out.
Why do you need guns? The police will prot-
Why the fuck did they do this again? Was there a valid reason to hold back the parents or something? I know the pigs are evil cowards but this is a whole other level
glowies involved imo
Because letting untrained AND psychotically emotional civilians rush loudly into a hostage/armed shooter situation is a fucking quick way to get them AND the people inside killed?
They wanted to do that because their kids were being shot and the police were sitting outside doing nothing, numbnuts. Maybe the police should have grown some fucking balls and went into the school to save the kids instead of giving the shooter free reign for an hour.
None of what you said contradicts what I said.
You're ignorant and don't know how these situations work.
If that had happened and the parents got themselves AND more kids blown away you'd be screeching OMG WHY DIDN'T THE POLICE STOOOOOOOOP THEEEEEEEEEEM REEEEEEEEEEEE.
>Ignores the part about the pigs doing nothing to save the kids
So dishonest. Do you even believe what you say anymore?
But I wasn't talking about that?
I was explaining why untrained, emotional randos aren't let lose in a hostage/active shooter situation. Which I did and you're still mad about.
stfu bootlicking shill, kids were being blown away while cops sat outside stopping parents
>guns prevent crime
>NOT LIKE THAT
>schizo word-salad
Disregarded.
Chud
>more schizo word-salad
Chud
Why are Cinemaphile's politics the same as Fox News watching boomers?
>Is that... a HECKING GUN?!?!? I'm like, SCARED OF GUNS! AHH, HELP ME!
You unironically label any sane opinion as being for "Fox News watching boomers", zoomy.
Oh boy, I am prepped and ready to give up my civil liberties and ability to defend myself in a nation with skyrocketing crime.....because if I don't some zoomtard who couldn't answer the question "What is a woman?" and eats fucking Tide Pods for Tik Tok cred will accuse me of watching Fox News or some shit!
Close the schools instead
>THOSE STUPID AND COWARDLY POLICE DID NOTHING TO PROTECT THE CHILDREN, THE POLICE ARE USELESS AND SHOULD BE ASHAMED
>WHOA WHOA WHOA, YOU WANT TO OWN A GUN? DON'T YOU KNOW THE POLICE WILL PROTECT YOU AND ARE ONLY A CALL AWAY?
American gun control proponents are mentally ill.
Gun control works in every single developed country
Almost as if America and Sweden are different
Yeah Europe is doing really well I hear
Their homicide rates are sure a lot lower than America's
They are also more white
Many European cities have more violent crime than fucking New York.
London is safer than any US city
>London is safer than any US city
London is less safe than any city where you can carry a gun.
Name one major city that has a lower homicide rate than London
>London is less safe than any city where you can carry a gun.
Pure delusion.
I'm safe regardless because I have a gun. You are only safe until something bad happens.
I'm sorry, I misread your post.
That's not what that chart shows, dipshit.
It shows that London is "safer" then several cherry-picked US cities, all of which are coincidentally Democrat strongholds.
Hmmmmmm.....
Europe doesn't see schools being shot up while cops are busy handcuffing parents who want to save their children from an armed mad man.
Eu is not a single country
Poland for example has close to zero mass shootings/muslim attacks
That's because they have strict borders. We do not.
Poland also has near zero foreign immigration and is hyper-conservative by modern standards. You EU fucks literally spent 2019 calling them "nazis".
Move to one of those countries then
America ISN'T EVERY OTHER DEVELOPED COUNTRY
THERE ARE MORE THAN HALF A BILLION GUNS IN THE US ALREADY
GUESS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU RESTRICT GUNS?
LAWFULL PEOPLE CAN NO LONGER GET THEM
UNLAWFULL PEOPLE HAVE FREE REIGN OVER HALF A BILLION GUNS
Look, I know this is hard for you to understand, but the US isn't a country that has a handful of farmers with double barrel shotguns hanging on the walls. It doens't work like that over here. Guns are literally part of the fabric of existence in this place. Get that through your European mind. The right of a citizen of the United States to own a gun is LITERALLY FUCKING SETTLED LAW.
If the US had the population of Australia, had maybe 200,000 guns, a secure border, and no second amendment, and no ingrained gun culture, yeah, you might be able to get some kind of measureable gun control to work. Guess what? None of that is true. WE AREN'T THE REST OF THE WORLD AND DON'T WANT TO BE
Ye i know, your country is fucked fundamentally
Alas I never take advice from someone I wouldn't trade places with
Yeah, we literally don't care about your country
It shows with your crying on all caps like a skitzo boomer every time someone shits on america
The fact that you spend all day every day on a fucking American website filled with Americans talking about America really drives home that you don't care about America.
This. The rest of the world is shit anyhow.
This post is cringe but unfortunately true. Getting guns off people in the US isn't a realistic goal.
Yeah, terrorism and mass-murder are America-exclusive.
>Gun control works in every single developed country
How do you figure?
The UK passed their big ban in 1997 and then proceeded to have mass shootings, one in 2011 and one last year in 2021.
The thing is, they UK has always been generally less violent than the US, because even before the ban they were only getting like one mass shooting a decade before, and they're still getting about one mass shooting a decade afterward either.
Hell, the homicide rate went up after the 1997 ban.
Almost as if we should reform the police and do sensible gun regulation. Both of which the left has been talking about for years.
Reform the police how exactly?
>reform the police
L
M
A
O
Guess what? The police have no duty to protect you. Guess who decided that? The Supreme Court. There is no police reform, as it is settled. There is no stopping this violence either, as nigs exist and there are north of 500 million guns in the US. The only thing you are going to do by trying to pass any kind of gun control is cement republican control over the house and senate, and inconvinience some grandma trying to buy a revolver or harmless gun enthusiast who wants to follow the law to a T. That's it. That's all it will do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
This is the case that decided that police don't have to protect you. You are on your own.
>The police have no duty to protect you. Guess who decided that? The Supreme Court
And perhaps we should change the laws and constitution so that it is part of their job. The fact that conservatives keep defending this type of shit and refusing to admit something is wrong with the police is the problem.
The police are fucking gays and should have no power at all. You're literally arguing that we should totally change massive aspects of society by completely changing the police (somehow, never heard specifics on this) and then rely on them totally for protection for the rest of our lives. Do you seriously think that could even happen in the first place? Think about this logically.
>And perhaps we should change the laws and constitution
Good fucking luck. I wish the police were different, but it's the reality we live in. Trying to disarm otherwise defenseless citizens in the midst of such unrest, broken policing, and violent crime is going to do nothing but make things worse here. We aren't like Europe where every gun is registerd and only farmers own them, it's a far different landscape in the US.
>And perhaps we should change the laws and constitution
>An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification.
How do you propose that be done when the dems controlling two branches couldn't do this?
>reform the police
Lol fucking how, Leftshit? By giving them less funding, then spending what money they do get on CRT-based training?
>GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS IS WHAT STOPS SHOOTINGS
>WOAH WOAH WOAH YOU WANT US TO STOP THAT SHOOTER? HE HAS A GUN?!?!?!
>>WOAH WOAH WOAH YOU WANT US TO STOP THAT SHOOTER? HE HAS A GUN?!?!?!
I don't understand, is this supposed to be the cops saying this or pro-gun parents? I'm confused.
Either
You don't even understand your own posts because they don't mean anything. How do you take yourself seriously and think that you should be telling other people how to live?
Because I'm older than you and richer than you
>Literally ad hominem shit
You have no argument whatsoever because you are fundamentally wrong. You have nothing and you are nothing. Now retreat back to your echochamber so you can have your braindead ideas reenforced again.
>literal ad hominem shit
You tried, kiddo
Police are good guys? Police actively kept parents from rescuing children though
whos to say the parent might have stormed into a classroom and killed a few kids by accident?
"Good guys with guns" HAVE stopped countless attacks, murders and even attempted mass-shootings. That isn't up for debate. It's a documented thing that has happened.
Also is this the new epic meme-image the retarded Commutrannies on LeftyPol came up with to totally BTFO the evil "chuds" again between dilation-sessions and masturbating to Pampers commercials? Naturally it doesn't even look like anyone and is a product of ther schizo shit that only exists in your head. And it only took you 2.5 years of collective effort to come up with, kek.
Although I guess basing it off nobody/nothing real prevents you from accidentally basing your "anti-4chan memes" on a an anti-Capitalist half-Hispanic half-garden gnome Registered Democrat raised by a single anti-Christian New Age Kabbalist father like you did with your last one, kek.
It's fucking staggering how much the Left CAN'T meme.
>"Good guys with guns" HAVE stopped countless attacks, murders and even attempted mass-shootings. That isn't up for debate. It's a documented thing that has happened
A black person became president and vice president. Cherry picking is fun
>"Good guys with guns" HAVE stopped countless attacks, murders and even attempted mass-shootings. That isn't up for debate. It's a documented thing that has happened.
>Also is this the new epic meme-image the retarded Commutrannies on LeftyPol came up with to totally BTFO the evil "chuds" again between dilation-sessions and masturbating to Pampers commercials? Naturally it doesn't even look like anyone and is a product of ther schizo shit that only exists in your head. And it only took you 2.5 years of collective effort to come up with, kek.
>Although I guess basing it off nobody/nothing real prevents you from accidentally basing your "anti-4chan memes" on a an anti-Capitalist half-Hispanic half-garden gnome Registered Democrat raised by a single anti-Christian New Age Kabbalist father like you did with your last one, kek.
>It's fucking staggering how much the Left CAN'T meme.
Oh God this is pathetic. Thank God Biden's tanking your entire party's popularity.
The left cant meme huh?
Well uhm...
The RIGHT cant meme!
>Also is this the new epic meme-image the retarded Commutrannies on LeftyPol came up with to totally BTFO the evil "chuds" again between dilation-sessions and masturbating to Pampers commercials? Naturally it doesn't even look like anyone and is a product of ther schizo shit that only exists in your head. And it only took you 2.5 years of collective effort to come up with, kek.
>Although I guess basing it off nobody/nothing real prevents you from accidentally basing your "anti-4chan memes" on a an anti-Capitalist half-Hispanic half-garden gnome Registered Democrat raised by a single anti-Christian New Age Kabbalist father like you did with your last one, kek.
>It's fucking staggering how much the Left CAN'T meme
>Photoshopped image
SAY IT WITH ME NOW
LEFT...
RIGHT...
This is a shitpost, but people who track the data don't include mass shootings stopped by someone shooting the gunman before a mass casualty event just be definition.
I should really start buying more ammo. Leftist chuds will start passing dumb legislation very soon
Yes, you should.
That's the thing about these AR-15 victims I keep getting older and they stay dead
Americans are brainwashed
Who cares? I am American and I want more murder.
There's too much traffic out here, lets thin the herd.
This. I'd much rather live in a country with more murder and more freedom than some Eurocuck country where the government has total power over you.
Live free or die, gay. See above.
>more freedom
America has the highest incarceration rate in the world.
Yeah,morons
I'm not incarcerated and I've never met anybody who has been to my knowledge. I don't care.
It's literally all inner city blacks. That's like saying Italy has a high rate of pick pockets, when literally 99% of them are gypsies that everyone hates. It's brutal to admit, but it doesn't effect 'regular people'.
>Laws existing and being enforced is BAD
I thought you boot-lickers LIKED laws and were demanding more of them?
We literally don't care. We prefer dangerous liberty.
Still better than you
>nog and epic gang members shooting each other
noooooooooooooo anything but thaaaaat
???
>very likely economic collapse
>massive push to disarm people
Hmmm senses activating
>what is a symbolic act
I thought this was fake. Makes you think if he's changing careers now. Judging by the state of modern cinema i can't blame him.
It's refreshing seeing the pro gun crowd finally admit that cops are completely fucking worthless tax drain on society instead of licking their boots
They didn't used to be like that though. Democrats unironically poisoned the institution over two decades with "anti-racist" policies, lower-quality standards to be more inclusive and ruining their lives for doing their jobs with BLM shit.
Nowadays I don't blame cops for not actively confronting a shooter. Why would they? What if the shooter isn't white (which is statistically always the most likely case)? They could do everything they're supposed to and rescue everyone like a real super cop and the Media will STILL ruin their lives over it.
We need gun contro-
E N T E R
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago
T
true detective season 1 bros... we lost...
Uh sweaty do you really think Matthew Frikkin McConaughey is gonna touch some ded kids stinky shoes?
I always thought it was funny when anti gun tards tell me that the police are going to go door to door and confiscate weapons. It's like they don't realize that cops and military are the biggest gun enthusiasts of all.
It's more likely that the police that come and confiscate my guns will see a gun of mine they like and invite me to the range to go shoot with them. I had a former SWAT sharpshooter help me zero in my new Savage the other day. These people aren't going to confiscate weapons from normal white people. They don't want to.
So those calling for banning the AR would you ban pic related?
Yes, chud.
Yes.
Ban all semi automatic rifles.
White American identity resolves around guns because they don't have any identity outside of guns
>If I say it it must be true
What does "white culture" revolve around in your country? Cucking for your government? How many brown dicks you can fit in your mouth?
I am not white, I am an Asian American. Asians in America have the lowest rate of gun ownership but we also have the lowest rate of victimization. White people in this country are obsessed with guns because they have no identity..
Lol yeah remember during the LA Riots all the Asian store-owners didn't need stinky old white people shit like "guns" to defend their homes, businesses and families? They just fought them off by lying still in meditation and projecting "cultural solidarity" at the nogs.
Those "roof Koreans" ended up shooting one of their own. What Koreans learned from the LA riots was that they needed to be politically active so that they can advocate for themselves in this racist country and that they need to do better outreach towards Black people and other communities. It wasn't that they needed to stay armed like the racist white incels on this board project onto them.
>and that they need to do better outreach towards Black people and other communities.
Yeah, they did some outreach with bolt action rifles during the riots.
>It wasn't that they needed to stay armed
Yes it was. They would have all been beaten and killed if they hadn't been.
The only Korean American killed during the riots was Jung Hui Lee, who was shot by the roof Koreans
*Edward Song Lee
Yes? Because they were armed.
If they weren't armed there would have been a lot more deaths, let me tell you.
>The only Korean American killed
Why the fuck do you think he was the only one? Because the rest of them had guns, you fucking idiot.
Stop trying to emasculate and disempower small asian communities you authoritarian shithead. A lot of them left dicatorships in China and Korea to get away from that shit, and your dumb liberal ass is trying to bring it back to them. They want nothing to do with it. Fucking quit.
Yes, because they were armed.
>one guy killed by friendly fire
Well that proves it. Asians shouldn't have guns and clearly don't need them. In the next chimp-out they will defend their homes and families and businesses with magically non-lethal kung-fu.
This is some of the most laughable SJW drivel I have ever seen posted unironically.
I don't even know where to start.
I think the best part is you unironically trying to paint Asians as "not racist", or even "less racist than white people".
You can listen to the interviews with the Korean American community leaders who were there during Saigu. They said the same thing. For example:
>some non-elected rando makes an extremely PC speech
Yeah, totally something that represents the feelings of the average working Joe.
Even if it did you're still objectively wrong AND laughably stupid. "Reaching out" to blacks, whatever the fuck that even means, is not going to protect you during a chimp-out. Guns will. And an IRL event like the LA Riots proved it to literally everyone.
You're wrong and your squealing impotent hatred of whites (who graciously let you or your ancestors into the country in the first place) is fucking hilarious.
White people did not willingly let Asians into the country. They passed Chinese and Japanese exclusion acts against us. If Asians didn't ride the coat tails of the Black civil rights movement, we still wouldn't have any rights in this country
>They passed Chinese and Japanese exclusion acts against us.
Yes? And then white people overturned and appealed those, and graciously let you into their country.
How are those acts relevant in any way of you're here in my country? If they were active you wouldn't be here.
>and that they need to do better outreach towards Black people
*WHEEZE*
Yes, that's what stops you from having your store looted, your business destroyed and your family murdered, not guns. The marauding nogs out for plunder and blood will TOTALLY care you fellated BLM online, or even KNOW that you did before they loot your store and gang-rape your wife.
I mean sucks for that guy but im sure the weapons they had were a good enough deterrent so more werent maimed or killed but thats just speculation. Plus youbcan be "politically" active and not disarm yourselves like a bunch of pussies hwite populations both past and present have managed to do so
Whose fault is it that so many asian-americans are attacked and/or killed by black assailants?
Well the cuck for your gov part is essential asian behavior
>they have no identity
Projection that means nothing.
Non-whites literally grasp at ANY straw they can to shit-talk white people because they have nothing BUT "straws".
>White people d-don't have no "cultural identity"....
>White people don't s-Hispanice they food....
>White people care about s-space and robots too much....
>but we also have the lowest rate of victimization
Wait I thought we were in an EPIDEMIC of Asian-targeted Hate Crimes, all perpetrated by white right-wing "incels" of course.
Was that a lie? I heard nothing but how much you guys are "victims" for like 18 months.
Would ukraime have faired better if their normal citizens were better armed?
/poltv/ used to love him, but now they hate him for speaking facts
Imagine turning your schools into prisons just because you don't want to give up your guns
Imagine giving up God given liberties just because someone died somewhere from something you didn't do
>God given liberties
>guns
In the US, this is literally true on a legal level.
The constitution is not freedoms granted by the government, it is a document that simply recognizes liberties that God has already granted. Then, the Supreme Court reafirmed the right of the people to keep and bear arms in 2008. It is quite literally a God given right in the United States.
>The constitution is not freedoms granted by the government, it is a document that simply recognizes liberties that God has already granted.
Uh, bro?
>We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Where's God mentioned in there?
Tell me you've never read the Constitution without telling me you've never read the Constitution
>Implying schools aren't prisons already
Were you homeschooled bro?
Giving up your guns is what prisoners have to do.
Also,
>unironically retweeting CNN
Since control tards have been permanently and foreverally BTFO, this is now an AR-15 thread.
I've been thinking about getting a monolithic upper LMT rifle, but I don't know which model I should go for. Any recommendations?
Direct Impingement or Piston operated?
I'm 20yo and they don't let us get guns here in Florida until we're 21 (Parkland "think of the children!"). What should be the first gun that I get once I turn 21? I was thinking probably a pistol so I could take it with me throughout the day.
>What should be the first gun that I get once I turn 21?
Really a what are you looking for kinda question. With most answers being what works best is preference.
It's cliche, but getting a good solid AR15 is never a bad choice. Daniel Defense, Colt, LMT, Knights Armament, Griffin Armament, FN, and many others make really solid rifles. Be sure to familiarize yourself with the rules of firearms safety if you haven't already.
If you go for a handgun, it's best not to be brand loyal, instead get one that fits your hands the best and that you can reach all the controls without shifting your grip.
not sure
Who do you like pretending to be most
Val Kilmer in Heat or Stallone in Rambo 3?
uh, wut? LMT didn't exist when those movies were made, and no one in them used a Piston AR with a monolithic handguard. I want one to avoid rail tilt and because I don't have a piston AR yet.
>WHITE HOUSE PRESS BRIEFING
>ACTOR
stop this
accelerate bros
I'm totally not a basement dwelling virgin.
I totally didn't spend $1000+ on this AR15 because I made it my political identity.
I bought it because I need to defend myself against moronS.
Yes I might shoot it once a year at a gun range
but you don't get it, I need this to defend against the tyrannical government and moronS!
Your mind is corrupted by ZOG. The day of the rope is coming and soon I won't have to see trannies in my favorite star wars™™ show anymore. I am an aryan warrior. My favorite politician (he's /ourguy/, one of the good ones) told me that the LIBTARDS wanna take my guns away and put my kids in GAY bathrooms. I've never been in a fight, and avoid conflict at every turn, but if a glowie moron wants to take away my guns I'm going to start a CIVIL WAR. Happening now! Accelerate!
YOU. AREN'T. GONNA. REPLACE. ME.
>chud copypasta
Go back to Discord.
>chud
>chud
>chud
anyone that disagrees with me is a chud
I am a based and redpilled aryan warrior, and I am armed!
Can I get a job? No.
Can I get a girlfriend? No.
Can I defend myself in any fight whatsoever? No.
BUT
I am going to defend my right to carry a firearm! I love violence and murder despite having no real experience with it! /accelerate/
Based NRA, based right wing politicians telling me what to do and how to vote, they are /ourguys/
I fucking LOVE Tucker
based 4chan!
I love 4chan contaminating other boards!
I'm not 16, I promise!
Didn't read.
41% yourself.
disagreeing with my political philosophy?
you must be a chud zog agent!
tucker told me you are trying to replace me!
my favorite republican senator told me you want my child to know that gay people exist and that I should vote for him, so you should have a nice day!
Europeans are generally more free than Americans
>*gets arrested for a tweet*
The US has over two million people in prison lmao
Tell me what are the demographics of that 2 million?
How many are for robbery, rape, drug dealing, murder, fraud, embezzlement, child-molestation, etc., and how many are for hurting a Feminist or Muslim's feelings on Twitter?
well they guy was asking people to go out and kill Muslims and was saying he wanted to behaed one
so not exactly hurting their feelings
Oh the one guy you cherry-picked? That's nice and all but what about all the others?
>OMG THE THIRD MOST POPULOUS NATIOB ON THE PLANET AND THE ONLY ONE IN THE TOP THREE WITH AN ACTUAL WORKING JUSTICE SYSTEM AND TRUSTWORTHY STATS HAS A NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN PRISON GREATER THAN MY EUROTRASH ARMPIT OF A COUNTRY THE SIZE OF A US STATE???????? OMG I AM GOING INSAAAAAAAAAAAAAANE!!!!!! MY TINY LITTLE APE-LIKE EURO-BRAIN CAN'T HAAAAAAANDLE IIIIIIIIIIIIT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!
AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
They literally put you in a jail cell for saying the Holocaust's numbers are "inflated".
>UK incarceration rate - 131.5 per 100 thousand people
>US incarceration rate - 629 per 100 thousand
UK: Much less morons
US: Much more morons
A huge majority of the US's bad statistics are thrown by inner city ghetto nogs that the rest of America doesn't care about or interact with.
>demon eye slip up
>listening to anyone with gay glasses
Good thread, my guys. I had a good time shitting on gun control retards and authoritarians.
As always, FUCK GUN CONTROL
see you in the next thread
>reddit spacing
>can we make it a little bit harder for people to purchase ar's please? thank you
>MY FREEDOM IS UNDER ATTACK THIS 18 YO MENTALLY CHALLENGED BOY THAT THINKS HE'S A WOMAN CAN'T DEFEND HIMSELF FROM BULLIES AT SCHOOL NOW
I never get how the fudds and retards have the loudest voice in the gun debate
literally every healthy minded person in america agrees that more thorough background checks and procedures before buying certain guns would be the best thing to do
Not getting any gun control, cry about it
>have kids your kids murdered in school
oh right you wouldn't care since you don't have any
>some dipshit millionaire from a gated community surrounded by armed security has a sub zero hottake on why the government and people like him should have more power over the peasantry