>Scoob animated movie was 95% complete. >cancelled

>Scoob animated movie was 95% complete
>cancelled
ouch

Stratton Oakmont Wolf of Wall Street Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Stratton Oakmont Wolf of Wall Street Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >tax write-off
    >Hollywood accounting

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You're allowed to say israelites

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        israeli people should be exempt from paying taxes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They took on a lot of debt amd have to cut costs. AEW is probay on the chopping block too.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wait a few years and it will get leaked just like the Popeye movie

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >warner bros in a nutshell

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was never about the money. We already have all the shekels in the world.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It’s a Scooby Doo movie, they make a bazillion of those every year

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    #ReleaseScoobHolidayHaunt
    #Boycott
    #FrickTheMan

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ReleaseTheScoobCut.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >95% finished
    What does this even mean?
    If you're 5% away from being done that implies it's shippable as is, which would alleviate some of the cost. No-one is going to hold onto a finished film.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      From my understanding last Friday they finished all of the animation, all that was left was the lighting.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        How much time doing that take?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        How much time doing that take?

        If rendering was left than the idea that the film was 95% complete is laughable. Rendering is by far the longest, most tedious, expensive, and hardware intenxive portion of a 3d animated film. A single frame of animation takes hours or days for a computer to render. If this was the case the film was probably canceled because it wouldn't have been finished on time.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >If rendering was left than the idea that the film was 95% complete is laughable.
          I have seen this passed around here, but not anywhere else. Where does this idea that rendering is what the movie is missing comes from?
          >If this was the case the film was probably canceled because it wouldn't have been finished on time
          Then save it for the next holidays.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Where does this idea that rendering is what the movie is missing comes from?
            When they say things like "the movie is 95% done", what they really mean is "95% of *our work* on this movie is done." Rendering is the most computer-intensive part of the production. This movie was not 95% done.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Does it seriously still take that long to render an animated film? Surely modern workstations are way more efficient?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Depending on how complex the shot is, it's between like 30 minutes to 30 hours to render a frame, most studios have render farms for that reason

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The new boss doesn't want anything started by the old boss. It's like how when a lion takes over a pride the first thing it does is slaughter all the cubs. CEOs work the same was.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yep, shit like this happens all the time, especially in animation. It's the same reason Nick fricked over Glitch Techs and Rise of the TMNT as well.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        based new boss

        https://i.imgur.com/ogIC90v.jpg

        >Scoob animated movie was 95% complete
        >cancelled
        ouch

        scoob! sucks ass anyway,

        Why do people keep pretending Scooby Doo was ever good. As IF the only reason you didn't change the channel as a kid was because your favorite toon was on next.

        Let's cut the shit. None of you ever watched Scooby Doo by choice.

        >"Mom please buy me this Scooby Doo boxset!"
        >"Don't forget to tape Scooby Doo while I'm out!"
        >"I can't wait for the new Scooby Doo episode to drop."

        Said nobody ever.

        >As IF the only reason you didn't change the channel as a kid was because your favorite toon was on next
        i think this only applies to the OG scooby doo. i find them okayish, nothing memorable except for their cameo in johnny bravo. i remember me and my parents enjoyed the spin-off with scrappy but its been so long since i last watched it.
        as a kid i only started liking scooby doo when i watched zombie island and what's new.

        right now my interest for the series was invigorated when i watched get a clue and be cool scooby doo.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >No-one is going to hold onto a finished film.
      happens all the time

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's a tax thing. Basically, never releasing it and using it as a tax write off (which is something you can do, I guess?) is considered a better financial move than having to spend more on marketing and releasing it in theaters or just dumping it on streaming.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        So it's better financially to hold onto an almost finished product even at the cost of the companies public image? I know there's a whole saying about there's no bad publicity, but after the shit Netflix pulled that caused them to lose a bunch of subscribers and Warner essentially doing the same thing I don't see how this can be a good move for them.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >So it's better financially to hold onto an almost finished product even at the cost of the companies public image?
          Apperently, yes. I'm not saying it's the right move, bud, I'm saying that some number cruncher looked at what it would cost to finish the movie and market it vs. What they would get from a tax write-off, and the write-off was more appealing.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >No-one is going to hold onto a finished film.
      lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >No-one is going to hold onto a finished film.
      Lol, goddamn you're so naive

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    jesus christ, can David Zaslav pull his head out of his ass and value the creatives who work under him over the possibility of saving some cash just once?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That seems like a financially shit decision just for your pride.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Well considering they are going to merge HBOMax and Discovery+ and rumor is HBOmax is the one getting folded into discovery instead of the other way around, no Zaslav cannot get his head out of his ass

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's actually disruptive. He wants to right the ship. We're not going to like all the decisions he makes and innocents will be killed along the way, but the fact that WB was in this position in the first place kind of justifies these harsh actions.
      The only real problem with shelving all of these projects is that we are left to our imaginations as to what was lost. Maybe it was all miserable crap.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    wait they were making a scoob holiday special? why the movie was shit and no one wants more of it

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >written by paul dini
    i'm good

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Do famous people have a twitter alert set up to notify them when someone posts their name even if they aren't mentioned

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Famous people probably have all sorts of unique features and perks exclusive to them on any social media platform, and it wouldn’t surprise me if this was one of them.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      People tag them when their name is brought up 9 times out of 10.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sure this means they fixed something in the machine and the future looks bright

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Frick, this sucks. Just finish it and sell it to Amazon or Netflix, WB

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You want the movie? You're gonna have to b***h really loudly at DISCOVERY.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Cancel the movie

    Frick that. Release it unfinished.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >laundering money

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Chances are that the movie was 100% garbage anyway (just like all of WB's movies)

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >no no I swear its like 99% done you just gotta pay me a few million more dollars to finish it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      lul

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good. Scoob was an absolute garbage that had nothing to do with Scooby Doo. It should crash and burn

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What's the fricking point if it's that close? Just finish it, release it unceremoniously on HBOMax and be done with it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      people coming in have no attachment to these projects and therefore don't give a shit if they are canned.

      Just clears the space for something that they can put their name on. Its the reason the Netflix Dark Crystal show was canned even thought they basically had all the materials to make future seasons on a better budget.

      It wasn't theirs and therefore they just don't give a shit.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      HBO wants to change their image and win back more white, male and conservative costumers that have been aliened by their "anti racist, female empowerment" content of late.
      Blackrock has lost $1.7 trillion this year, so funding for woke flops is getting reduced.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >It's almost done
      >Why not make back some money
      Isn't this the kind of short-term thinking that companies are normally lambasted for?
      It doesn't matter how close it is to completion if it damages the brand in the long run.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They get a tax write-off if they completely cancel projects in production pre-merger. The company is billions in debt. This would underperform on any platform. It is a no-brain move, I do not see why people
      cannot grasp this when the company itself has said as much.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    wasn't the first one super woke with white male characters once again being all depicted as incompetent manchildren and weaklings so that an OC black "strong wyman" could look good in comparison?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      She wasn't an OC. She was just from an unrelated HB show.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why do people keep pretending Scooby Doo was ever good. As IF the only reason you didn't change the channel as a kid was because your favorite toon was on next.

    Let's cut the shit. None of you ever watched Scooby Doo by choice.

    >"Mom please buy me this Scooby Doo boxset!"
    >"Don't forget to tape Scooby Doo while I'm out!"
    >"I can't wait for the new Scooby Doo episode to drop."

    Said nobody ever.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      god it was on all the fricking time on early cn

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nah I enjoyed classic Scooby Doo on Boomerang and got a bunch of the 80s and 90s movies on VHS plus Night of 100 Frights, Mystery Mayhem and Unmasked for PS2.

      Kind of sucks I missed the boat with Mystery Incorporated but I might give it a try someday. As a Twin Peaks fan I might get something out of it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Scooby Doo has one of the longest running lines of direct-to-video movies in history. How do you think those justify their existence? From a single, random airing on Cartoon Network?

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Let the Past Die, Kill It If You Have To.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The Previous Scoob movie was garbage…so I fail to see this as a great loss

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *