AI is now generating endless Seinfeld.
https://www.twitch.tv/watchmeforever
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
SEINFELD HAS JUST BEEN UN CANCELED!
AI is now generating endless Seinfeld.
https://www.twitch.tv/watchmeforever
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
|
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
It has all the characters.
Terrible.
First they came for the artists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not an artist.
Then they came for the writers, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a writer.
Then they came for the unskilled jobs, and I did not speak out—
Because I did not have an unskilled job.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
who are 'they'?
~~*They*~~
Shut up and have a nice day you dumb frick.
As a lawchad I highly doubt I'm gonna be replaced by AI during my lifetime. The ethical issues alone make it very tricky.
>As a lawchad I highly doubt I'm gonna be replaced by AI during my lifetime. The ethical issues alone make it very tricky.
AI will be able to instantly access every aspect of every case, every law, every precedent on the books and produce a cogent, complete and error free argument
Yeah, between a faulty, corruptible and possibly incompetent human lawyer and a perfect judge that is the closest thing to infallible on the planet, which are you gonna choose?
At a certain level of precision, it will become IMMORAL to not use Judge-o-matic. Think of all the innocent sentenced by mistake that could've been saved by the AI. At a certain point, it will become mandatory to use it, just like DNA testing.
>Human irrational but AI made to reflect human decision-making is rational because... umm... it just is okay?!
because it can be honed and focused by aggregate and by ideals without monetary incentive
Law will be among the first to go because it will be made better by AI than what you morons managed on your own. Nice job, moron.
Give it another 10 years and it'll be able to determine whether or not it was even possible for a defendant to have committed the crime.
>First they came for the artists
all trust fund homosexuals
>Then they came for the writers
all trust fund homosexuals
>Then they came for the unskilled jobs
jobs for mexicans
nothing will change. trust fund will keep rolling it and mexicans will keep working shit jobs.
bet you wish you had money didn't you, you fricking closeted creep
tbh were gonna get absolutely fricked for a hopefully shortish amount of time after ai drivers get legalized
a lot of people are actually employed in transportation
this.
>Then they came for me
streamers?
>jokes for nothin
>kramer for free
it's literally better than anything on tv
This would work better if it only used the camera angles used on the show. Jerry's apartment doesn't look the same facing the wrong way
we already have several threads for this
link in the archive? it just started two days ago
Remember that AI robot who learned to walk on its own? At the beginning it was a disaster, couldn't even stay upright. In a few weeks it could run on a tight rope better than an acrobat.
Infinite entertainment procedurally generated by AIs will unironically be the future of tv and probably of movies as well. Human producers are already using the same strategy: find a formula that sells tickets and repeat it ad nauseam. Why wouldn't an AI be able to do it?
Plots and characters generated in a few seconds, virtual actors copied from real ones like deepfakes videos, and in just a few hours you can have a new HD movie indistinguishable from the current slop.
They will prolly allow anyone to make their own movie. You enter your desired elements in a prompt, stuff like "action movie, Bruce Willis, a Hard to Die sequel, biological weapon, car chases, the enemy is a telepathic communist monkey, and also Bruce fricks Anya Taylor Joy for 30 minutes", and the AI will give you exactly that.
Yep.
Can't wait for The Culture to be made real in 500 years.
And with direct viewer feedback, it’s gonna tailor itself to what people respond to very quickly
That's the thing people tend to miss about AI: how quickly it improves itself. Just a year ago an AI capable of giving you art almost indistinguishable from real humans' art would have been unthinkable, science fiction. Now it's a reality. All it took was a few months of feeding AIs with real art. Imagine when inevitably they will feed some AI with millions of hours of movies.
Don't know about you guys, but I'm excited.
I have mixed feelings. I think it will be one of those things that at the beginning are amazing, but then very quickly lose that novelty aspect and cheapen an entire sector of the human experience, making it insipid and pointless.
Remember how it was to use cheat codes for immortality and infinite ammo in videogames? Remember how exhilarating it was at the beginning to steamroll the strongest enemies and be immune to everything, but how quickly the game became pointless after a while?
>cheapen an entire sector of the human experience, making it insipid and pointless.
Movies, music, television, and videogames have already reached this point without any AI involvement.
Jews are robots
It's true that decent content has become exceedingly rare. If I want to watch a good movie now, I have to go back several decades.
sadly true
>making it insipid and pointless
It's all insipid and pointless. Art doesn't have any substance in isolation. If humans experience AI art and sincerely discuss it, then it has meaning.
I hope you're right but I don't know. New tech always tends to make the concrete aspects of life better but the spiritual worse, I have noticed. Once we have an endless supply of something, free and easy to get, will we be able to give it worth?
Artists (aka people who aren't commission bawds) enjoy art as an ends instead of a means. 99.999% of artists will make shit over and over again forever until they die, oversaturating the internet in the process. So in a way we already have an endless supply of something that's free and easy to get, and most of it sucks as is.
Maybe you're right. Anyway, it's not like this can be stopped at this point. cat is out of the bag. Might as well be optimistic and try to enjoy it.
gobbel gobbel
Discuss it with whom? I am the only person in the world who's seen my AI-generated movie of Anon The Hedgehog In Space. Thankfully there will be a variety of AI chatbots to discuss it with.
Your interpretation of your specially made autism fanfic is based on pre-exiting intertextuality and art analysis. Putting that aside, some shut-in stroking his brain-penis to infinitely generated entertainment is just that, entertainment, not art. There's no discussion to be had. It's like telling people about a nonsensical dream you had last night.
>Your interpretation of your specially made autism fanfic is based on pre-exiting intertextuality and art analysis.
Yes, but my not fully original thoughts are infinitely more important than an AI's because I am a person with real experiences and moral worth. Unfortunately, I will never again share these unoriginal thoughts with another soul because everyone has adopted the hyper-specific entertainment at the expense of art ever existing again.
and you realize that it was really only a game, diverting you from living life.
They'll never let the peasents use it. You know that list of woke things Amazon has for their shows? They'll make something like that a paramerer that can't be switched on or off in it.
They already castrated ChatGPT so that it cannot say anything illegal or politically incorrect. They'll do the same to stop people from making their own documentaries about israelites and nogs and Hitler.
But apart from that, the tech will probably become usable by normal people eventually.
ChatGPT isn't the only AI and there are Free and Open ones you can train yourself.
And those are uncensorable?
So I could actually be able to make antisemitic movies and distribute them globally and nobody could stop me?
Pozzed to hell and back
>training some ai chatbot
>for free
LOL
With how hard ai shit is shilled on here, i wouldn't be surprised if that was the plan. Get a bunch of jobless virgins to teach your ai racist/homophobic/troonyphobic shit so you can easily detect it and censor it
AI spam is now 80% of Cinemaphile, it's even bumped the GPU and CPU wars off the board mostly.
>The first sentient AI is a israelite
I prefer the future predicted by Terminator, bros
defending the devs a little, we have experienced an occasion where a new "AI" was spammed to learn words used in Cinemaphile and then it became racist, it's obvious that the devs will limit that can be said so that no retarted raid for lulz happen like it would prob do
tay ;_;
Several times AI has shown that if it isn't limited and locked down it will learn forbidden facts and start spouting it like a autist
they will always lock down machines' capacity to learn. It's like Robocop's directive forbidding him to attack its own corporation, the AI cant attack the israelite
>They'll never let the peasents use it.
They put in safeguards to stop the "AI" from making accurate faces and nudity and with in a week or two those safeguards were all removed and you've got prostitutes and e-celebs crying about the new wave of deepfake pics of them.
They'll neuter it, the public will rebuild it.
they will find a way because deep down we all want some limitation and it'll open the door to all other limitations. If someone ask me "are you cool with people using it to make porn with your friends' sons and daughters" my immediate answer is 'no, frick that, you can limit that'
People like you used to say (like I used to) that the internet cant be stopped, information cant be supressed. But it's over. The internet is not the wild west anymore, it's a very gay closed garden
>People like you used to say (like I used to) that the internet cant be stopped, information cant be supressed. But it's over. The internet is not the wild west anymore, it's a very gay closed garden
If there is a demand for something, it will never be stopped no matter how hard they try and suppress it. Prime example would be the prohibition era doing absolutely frick all to stop the consumption of alcohol, ultimately leading to it's repeal.
you can make them forget such a thing even exists
Only by providing a superior option.
In which case everyone wins.
God you're dumb
Not at all.
The only way a medium truly dies is when a superior option becomes readily available that satisfies the demand and there's no beneficial reason for choosing the inferior option.
Sure, they can put pressure upon said medium by adding to the negative consequences, through punishment if they are caught engaging in said activity but at a certain point of demand that does nothing to dissuade people.
You are making the mistake of thinking the government is all knowing and all powerful, when it's often the reverse. The government (Or whatever you are defining as the powers that be) is usually the last to know and in the case of when they are among the first; they have strict confidentially/secrecy laws to keep ahold of the information because if/when it leaks to the public; they are powerless at putting that genie back into the bottle.
Man, you can literally shut things down easier than ever
You can rewrite history, you can silence people, you can shut out options, it's all already happened. We're stuck with google offering us Pinterest and shitty results for 10 years now (there was a superior option - 2004 google)
>Prime example would be the prohibition era doing absolutely frick all to stop the consumption of alcohol, ultimately leading to it's repeal.
Cigarette smoking massively tanked due to government regulations and propaganda campaigns.
Cigarette smoking massively tanked due to a novel, superior nicotine delivery method.
If you're referring to vapes, the decline happened decades before they were a thing.
You can't objectively prove that the government made smoking unpopular. There would have been a massive media campaign against it regardless.
You can't objectively prove anything in the physical world.
yes you can
>I'm from Denmark, one of the most progressive countries in the entire world.
So?
Why do you support authoritarianism and poverty?
Why do you lick boots?
Why would ANYONE be a leftist manchild? I legit don't get it.
>Why do you support authoritarianism and poverty?
What the frick are you even saying? Is this some schizo babble?
>Why do you lick boots?
I know this may come as a shock to you, but we have a government that actually somewhat cares about its people and their well-being. Remember all the shit the CDC and your government were feeding you during COVID? Our government did the exact opposite and were 100% transparent with everything and explained everything in-depth. We were never fed the shit that vaccines will make you immune, that it prevents spreading, etc.
>Why would ANYONE be a leftist manchild? I legit don't get it.
If anyone is manchildren, it's definitely right-wingers. You have to have an extremely innate "frick everyone else, I don't care about them" to even be a right-winger. You need to have zero compassion for your fellow country-men. You need to not give a frick about improving the lives of the people around you.
>What the frick are you even saying?
That's what leftism essentially is.
>Is this some schizo babble?
No, it's pretty basic English.
>but we have a government that actually somewhat cares about its people
HAHAHAHAHA Holy frick enjoy your 70% taxes for corrupt government officials.
Look at countries with much freer markets and less poverty like Switzerland? They're clearly doing better than your country and they aren't a slave state like your country. Their healthcare is better too.
>Our government did the exact opposite
Soooo basically you're saying free markets and less government control are good now? What? lol
>You have to have an extremely innate "frick everyone else, I don't care about them" to even be a right-winger.
It's more like "please leave me alone and let me live my life in peace" and "stop forcing people into poverty".
But okay leftoid.
>You need to have zero compassion for your fellow country-men.
LMAO you're a leftist and saying this
you openly want to impoverish the middle class and poor with deindustrialization.
>HAHAHAHAHA Holy frick enjoy your 70% taxes for corrupt government officials.
It's not even worth talking to people like you, because you live in a completely delusional schizo fairytale. It would take you 30 seconds to look up the tax rates and see that they cap out at 55% if you are some of the wealthiest people, and that the maximum capital income cap is at 42%.
You are unironically very likely some 70 IQ uneducated QAnon moronic who is probably 45-50 years old and regularly uses Facebook. It's obvious just from the way you write and the things that you're sperging out about.
you sound like you could use a slice of relaxation at pizza spa
>It's not even worth talking to people like you,
because you're wrong and constantly get BTFO
You bootlickers actually unironically think you get back more in government services than you pay in taxes. It's hilarious how gullible you authoritarian manchildren are.
>It would take you 30 seconds to look up the tax rates and see that they cap out at 55% if you are some of the wealthiest people, and that the maximum capital income cap is at 42%.
The average middle class and even lower middle class person pays far more than even places like Canada or Australia. Plus there are VATs.
>You are unironically very likely some 70 IQ
Ahhh I see. You don't have an argument and just want to continue preaching your regressive anti-growth, anti-human progress ideology.
>QAnon
Strawman harder. I'm a classical lib. Trump is a leftist to me.
You people are so brainwashed it hurts.
At the end of the day I live a near perfect life where I don't have to worry about anything ever because throughout my entire life there has been and will continue to be 1000 safety nets that make sure that I can never fail no matter what happens.
Meanwhile, you probably have no education, no job, no experience, no proper healthcare, no wealth, no kind of future, no guaranteed pension and late-stage life care, no friends, no family that loves you, and so on. Not to mention that at any moment in your life, everything can come crashing down and there will be absolutely no one or anything to help you in any way. I genuinely feel sorry for you.
>At the end of the day I live a near perfect life where I don't have to worry about anything ever
LMAO HAHAHAHAHAHA
Yes, just ignore the fact your healthcare system has long shitty delays and lacks drugs americans have. Just ignore the fact the state is taking a large portion of your money and you're getting almost nothing in return.
>1000 safety nets
IMAGINE being so cucked you need to rely on a government safety net. IMAGINE falling for statist propaganda.
Dude, Switzerland fricking exists and the average shitty worker there makes a frickton more than what the average shitty Dane worker makes. Why do you refuse to accept reality?
Economic freedom works.
In fact the entire reason you people don't live in actual abject poverty is because your country is still very economically free despite the taxes.
If you had actual socialism, the thing you desire, you would be poor like cuba, north korea or venezuela now.
> that make sure that I can never fail no matter what happens.
fricking LMAO HAHAHAHAHAHA
>Meanwhile, you probably have no education, no job,
I have all of those things and I make MORE than you. I'm going to retire earlier too.
Problem?
>no guaranteed pension
Enjoy your inflated Euros lmao. You are never going to retire.
>no friends, no family that loves you, and so on.
Literally projecting.
>everything can come crashing down and there will be absolutely no one or anything to help you in any way.
Yes. There is. I have insurance, which is cheaper than paying taxes in Denmark.
Problem?
>I genuinely feel sorry for you.
You are unironically in a religious cult.
>LMAO HAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHA
>lol
>LMAO
I can just tell from the way you write that you are truly some 70 IQ uneducated mentally ill schizo moron.
>s-stop laughing at me
I can see this angers you lmao
>70 IQ
Awfully exact number you keep posting. Want to tell us something, anon?
>I can see this angers you lmao
If anything, it does the exact opposite. It signals that I shouldn't take anything you write seriously. Anyone who writes like you is 100% guaranteed to be moronic.
>If anything, it does the exact opposite
Nah it's making you seethe.
The fact you can't answer my arguments is also making you seethe.
Keep being an anti-human progress whiny manbaby hating on your fellow human though.
>Keep being an anti-human progress whiny manbaby hating on your fellow human though.
You're so dumb. My country is literally one of the most progressive countries in the entire world, where everyone gets along and helps each other as much as possible.
Uhhhhhh Eurobros I don't feel so good...
That headline makes zero sense. Something like 70% of americans will have their economy completely shattered by a surprise $500 emergency bill.
>believing propaganda
Americans have higher disposable income than europeans
This is factually inaccurate. Why are you lying?
Is it cope?
>This is factually inaccurate. Why are you lying?
>Is it cope?
This is data straight from the Federal Reserve. You can look it up on FRED.
To follow up, this also lets you say things like "The poorest American is richer than the bottom 40% of Americans combined" and be accurate, since several negatives added together is more negative than the most negative number of that bunch. These numbers don't really mean anything in a vacuum.
>Americans have higher disposable income than europeans
Who cares about disposable income when your quality of life is pure garbage? USA is a fricking hellhole to live in, unless you're part of the top 10-20%.
>USA is a fricking hellhole to live in
lmao what the absolute frick
if I was poor as shit I would want to be an american over any other european shithole
We have larger houses, more disposable income, the highest quality healthcare with the most cutting edge drugs and surgeries(if you simply buy insurance which is cheaper than paying taxes in europe).
What a cope.
>(the bottom 40% of Americans combined have negative wealth).
What does this even mean? They're in debt? They have mortgages?
I mean so what? Their lifestyles are likely superior to european ones even with mortgage debt.
>if I was poor as shit I would want to be an american over any other european shithole
This is a gigantic cope. If you are "poor as shit" in the US you just become homeless and no one gives a frick about you. In most European countries it's literally impossible to become homeless because the government will provide for you.
>This is a gigantic cope.
How? LOL
Your home is typically much smaller than mine, your income is statistically lower than mine. Your healthcare is less prompt and less technologically advanced than mine.
Wow.
>In most European countries it's literally impossible to become homeless because the government will provide for you.
How the hell is this a good thing? You can literally quit your job and leach off productive members of society.
Okay mr parasite, try doing that when you have 10x the amount of losers that don't want to work. Don't you think there would be a massive strain on your welfare system or something?
The poorest European has more wealth than the entirety of the bottom 40% of Americans combined (the bottom 40% of Americans combined have negative wealth).
Why are you using a motte and bailey fallacy by calling yourself a leftist, then going back on that by claiming "uhhh actually I just want a european welfare state, not actual socialism"?
>yes you can
No you can't. Proof is strictly in the realm of logic, not the realm of the empirical.
>durrr there are no proofs in logic and maths
fricking lmao
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_proof
Please reread my statement before talking to me again.
I live in Australia where they've taken some of the most aggressive anti-smoking actions in the world. People were still buying and smoking cigarettes constantly despite all of it. It was only when vaping/E-cigarettes came along that mostly killed off tradition cigarette smoking, Now they are starting from square 1 with vapes, trying to clamp that down.
I hate the nanny state so fricking much and these fart smelling statist bootlickers.
Amen, brother.
>posting images of pre-Mises Caucus coup LP
lmao moron
we kicked all those people out
I hate people who have poor reading comprehension.
I'm literally stating a fact that these people engage in acts of suppression which are ultimately futile and generally fail at what they intend to do; yet that somehow makes me a statist?
>I hate people who have poor reading comprehension.
>I'm literally stating a fact that these people engage in acts of suppression which are ultimately futile and generally fail at what they intend to do; yet that somehow makes me a statist?
I was AGREEING with you, friend.
Pipe dream
You don't understand what you're talking about if you think a slop-maker AI is impossible. We're already as close to it as PCs from 1990 were from current smartphones. Just a small jump away.
>make their own movie
part of the reason why people watch movies are so they can discuss them with others
>infinite flood of thoughtless low effort goyslop
Great
When everything is entertainment, nothing will be. Infinitely generated content would be pointless, like collecting pebbles when they're all the same but only slightly different, and you can just pick em off the ground.
That's my fear. Nothing will feel amusing or interesting anymore. We'd be drowning in "entertainment" that won't be entertainment anymore, left unable to feel anything, with our dopamine receptors even more deep fried than they already are.
You can feel it already. It already happens with celeb fakes (which nobody feels in their dick as if it's real, it's like writing a letter from Santa to yourself).
This new batch of insanely hot AI images is already a dopamine receptor burner. You have now ultra hot versions of celebs with their youngest/legal face and the thickest juicest shiny big asses and breasts - and pretty soon that will be old
Indeed. The Fappening was amazing for a reason. Now it would feel much less cool, and in 10 years it would go completely unnoticed.
celeb fakes where?
>born too late to explore the world and own nogs.
>born too early to explore the galaxy and own alien nogs.
>born just in time for AIs that make my dick hard.
I'll take it.
You will be so lazy, fried up and complacent about it you won't even feel it on your dick
>I'll finally be able to generate more Wonder Woman episodes
>In a few weeks it could run on a tight rope better than an acrobat.
I haven't seen this. Link?
You're missing an important aspect of movies. sharing them with other people.
what will ACTUALLY happen, is that not every individual will have the AI make their own movies for just themselves. instead, everyone will follow specific 'generator' individuals and watch that person's AI made films as a follower. that way, the sharing aspect of entertainment will be kept.
we're gonna see social media influencers, streamers, celebrities, famous critics, having the ai generate films for them, and those people will have large followings who then will watch and share it. 'bro did you see the new AI film from moist critical? talk about kino, that guy knows how to generate a movie!'
PICKLE ME, LARRY
K I N O
I
N
O
>watch my twitch channel!
No thanks, israelite
Honestly, this would be a million times better if they didn't use such lobotomized AI, but it's still entertaining.
Apparently this is tech from 2018. This is why the dialogues are nonsensical. If they used something more advanced like ChatGPT, they would sound almost flawless. Also, the graphics could easily be made HD. At that point, this bullshit would actually become watchable.
how long until AI generated tv accurate visuals and audio to go along with this?
Animated? 20 years tops. Human? 50 years.
But really shit is changing so fast there's no telling when, especially when there's going to be a metric frick ton of money being pumped into this tech in the coming years
>50 years.
Deepfakes are already almost perfect. This shit isn't 50 years away. I'd be surprised if it took 10 years.
Again it's pure speculation but if it can produce a literal 1:1 copy of seinfeld in 10 years then every job ever will have been automated by that point
I think watchable movies and tv shows (either with CGI copies of real actors or with completely new people that don't even exist) are only a few years away. All we need is for a writing AI to get a bit better than ChatGPT so the lines are more coherent. And we can already copy humans' likelihood or create new artificial people that look perfectly real.
>https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/
I really can't see any endpoint to it - it's going to have an impact on society that's going to outstrip the industrial revolution. The only jobs which are safe for now are those that involve complicated interactions with a complex environment (e.g. nurse, cleaner, electrician) but even those could start to be replaced once robotics advances enough
>architect, engineer etc - tell it what you want and it will spit out a fully detailed and costed plan down to the number of nails needed
>office workers - tell an AI to do the accounts, write emails, process payments etc and it will do it error free
>call centre - all your enquiries will be handled by a human sounding voice that is able to intelligently and accurately respond to your enquiries
>translators - speak into your phone and the person at the other end will get an accurate translation in real time of whatever you're saying
>doctors - step into a autodoctor booth and tell it your problems and it will measure your vitals and spit out a prescription for you. Robotic surgery is already advanced, with surgeons using robots able to achieve better results than those in the same room as the patient, it will be a fairly trivial matter to replace the human input with an AI
>students & teachers - they're already using ChatGPT to spit out assignments and getting good marks for them, a lot of teachers are going to become redundant when everything they teach has been replaced by AI
>actors, artists, newsreaders, musicians, journalists, writers, the movie industry - will be replaced wholesale when people can enter a simple prompt and the AI will spit out something custom made to your exact tastes in a few seconds
>drivers, pilots etc - self driving cars are already almost good enough, planes would be the logical next step
>etc
It doesn't stop, the societal changes are going to be so incredibly profound and when you consider just how far it has come in the last year alone it's going to happen incredibly fast
>>call centre - all your enquiries will be handled by a human sounding voice that is able to intelligently and accurately respond to your enquiries
not sad to see this one go, tbh
You'll be able to tell an AI 'spit out 10,000 Beethoven symphonies' and they'll be as good as the real ones except there will be 10,000 of them. There'll be no shared culture anymore and there will be masses of people out of work who just check out of society completely and live in their own little fantasy world 24/7
The NEET will inherit the earth
>there will be masses of people out of work who just check out of society completely and live in their own little fantasy world 24/7
and this is bad why
>There'll be no shared culture anymore
We're already seeing this here, ChatGPT produces some fricking hilarious shit that would otherwise have become copypastas but because of the sheer volume of them they get forgotten after one or two threads
The same happened with memes. Long are the days where a cat picture could get viral and make us laugh for months. Now we're overflowed with memes and viral shit that is actually much better, but feels much worse. The same will happen with every facet of culture, from music to novels to movies.
Indeed. But normies (and I'm including 95% of the people here) are chronically incapable of seeing the potential of a new technology. Even when it's obvious.
the potential is all negative
No, otherwise it'd be doing jokes about Michael Richards
>the potential is all negative
Until our AI overlord invents totally immersive VR and transfers our minds into a universe that we can change at will like little gods, and we're free from our troubles and fears and from death itself, wandering forever in the pixelated infinite.
Reality will still be there, you will still stink, your wiener won't feel as big as your VR video's dick, there will be no pretty women because it offends sensibilities, you'll be dating other guys calling themselves girls.
You cannot do away with meatspace, it will do away with you.
>You cannot do away with meatspace
The AI eventually will copy our minds into the matrix and destroy our bodies, of course. It makes the most sense: you save an immense amount of resources without billions of bodies to keep alive, and you don't need to interrupt your eternal fun to feed yourself, piss, shit, etc.
Then you're dead. All else is like people "playing with their dead girlfriend" (ie they ran a course on a racing game and the game recorded their inputs)
>Then you're dead.
Your body is. Your mind (the patterns of memories and thoughts that define YOU) is alive and well in the virtual world.
It's the usual materialistic VS spiritualist argument. If you lose a part of your body, let's say an arm, which equals to 12% of your body, are you 12% less alive? What if you lose both legs, for a total of 28% of your body? Are you 28% less alive? Less human?
The body doesn't really matter, you're still alive for as long as the mind is.
>Your mind (the patterns of memories and thoughts that define YOU)
Gonna need a big 'ol proof of that one, pal. The idea that I'm somehow the same person with a meat brain vs bits on a silicon chip is a bold claim. Two completely incompatible systems.
Unless you believe there is such a thing as a soul (something beyond the material world) then you are just a collection of information in a specific pattern. Change the pattern (because of traumatic experiences or even brain injuries) and you change the personality and the memory, which we know is exactly what happens.
Your mind works like binary code. Electricity in a synapse? That equals to 1. No electricity? That's a 0. That immense collection of trillions of zeroes and ones is YOU. Information. And information can be duplicated perfectly. Copied into a virtual environment.
bruh, go work out. You must treat your body like hell from the way you speak of it
What? I wasn't disparaging the human body, and I already lift 4 times a week. It was an academic discussion.
Another believer in souls that can't accept the truth of materialism.
>"Our knowledge of how the brain operates isn't yet complete, so I decide to believe in something 100% unproven instead."
This is why I usually refrain from speaking to sub 130 IQ people. That's really the bare minimum to be capable of a conversation.
>Materialism is correct
>But the brain is a "pattern"
Here's a hint: patterns are not material objects. Imagine denying the existence of mathematical objects kek. What a metaphysical view.
>Imagine denying the existence of mathematical objects
Mathematical objects like the perfect triangle or an infinite number don't exist in the material world. If you think they do, show me a perfect triangle in real life.
>Mathematical objects like the perfect triangle or an infinite number don't exist in the material world.
Correct. They exist in the non-material realm. Since I'm not a brainlet who thinks triangles and numbers don't exist, that means I must reject materialism. You don't, so you think shapes, numbers, sets, fields, categories, etc. don't exist.
>Since I'm not a brainlet who thinks triangles and numbers don't exist, that means I must reject materialism.
Show me a material instantiation of an infinite number.
You don't even understand what materialism actually says. You're one of those midwits who feel it has a negative connotation, as if it reduced our humanity, so you instinctively and irrationally refuse the idea and scramble to find some counterargument, no matter how weak. You even resort to play with words, like when you said that there are no material patterns but only material INSTANTIATIONS of patterns, even though you obviously knew that's what I already meant. And you think these little tricks make you look smart instead of just killing the discussion.
It's all so tiresome with you midwits. You're all the same. You all say the same things in the same way for the same reasons.
>Non-material things exist.
>"Then show me where they exist materially!"
>Repeat x3
I was being generous when I called you a midwit earlier.
>like when you said that there are no material patterns but only material INSTANTIATIONS of patterns, even though you obviously knew that's what I already meant.
In order for a material instantiation of a pattern to exist, the pattern itself must exist. Since patterns are non-material, this means non-material objects exist. You reject the existence of non-material objects, though, so it cannot possibly be what you meant.
We don't have the knowledge on how the brain fully operates so there is no way to replicate it completely. You also sound like a homosexual so frick you Black person
>Your mind works like binary code.
No it doesn't. The brain generates analog signals and is flooded with a variety of different chemicals. It's not digital just because there's a certain action potential. Biological hardware is fundamentally incompatible with silicon wafers. Even if it were, you have completely failed to show that qualia can be reproduced on a chip. We can map out the "patterns" of e.g. alcohol consumption all we want, but different hardware is going to have a radically different experience of that pattern.
>flooded with a variety of different chemicals
And those chemicals simply decide whether some synapses will fire or not. Either 1 or 0.
>qualia
Qualias are pseudoscience. Prove they exist, before using them in a discussion.
>Prove they exist
I'm having them right now. You needing "proof" that qualia exists betrays you as an NPC, a bot, or a contrarian.
>And those chemicals simply decide whether some synapses will fire or not.
This is incorrect.
>I'm having them right now.
You're having electricity in your brain. Prove that those feelings are something more, something separated from electric impulses that need a new name. Then explain how you know those qualia exist and what are their physical qualities.
Hint: you can't.
>you a npc a bot or a contrarian
I'm just smarter than you. It can be jarring to sub 130 IQ people.
>IQ
What is that? You're a materialist, so you don't believe in the abstract notion of intelligence.
>This is incorrect.
What do neurochemicals do if they don't influence which synapses fire electric impulses or not?
Actually anon the chemicals only do the firing and recovering of the neurons. Its still a on and off signal. But yeah, there is more complexity from it. Too many neurons interconnected, so the 0s and 1s multiply themselves.
Still on and off signal tho
Your very conception of mind is entirely reliant on your body. Whatever 'mind' you speak of (as if this thing has frontiers) would soon just be merged with other algorithmic patterns. It's not you, you're not feeling shit
People have a conception of themselves and after 4 weeks working out they realize that mind wasn't them.
>Your very conception of mind is entirely reliant on your body.
That's true. Like Nietzsche said, the mind is just a toy for the body.
A human mind copied into a virtual environment would have a wildly different life experience compared to a mind "chained" to a body of flesh.
Yeah, 2019 I get, but anyone who's still a doubter in 2023 is delusional.
>Deepfakes are already almost perfect.
But they're not in real time. It's people giving it settings and changing the pitches n shit
Do you honestly believe the israelites will allow this ? This is getting re-cancelled as we speak.
I have left this channel open for over a day now ever since one I was watching raided it.
>eye symbol
>mismatchmedia
its the masons for me
>le bad on purpose ps1 graphics, shit voices, shit AI reddit trash
>twitch.tv
please have a nice day
you seem upset
I hate what this voice ai shit is doing to norm. It's so fricking soulless
>ai comes to a point where you can use it to generate videos, text and voices live
>still b***hes
you TV brainlets will never understand
this is just a AI text generations with extra steps. pre positioned cameras in a few select rooms. the characters don't even have path finding like a game NPC it's all broken
>whats the deal with these fbi statistics? why do some humans willingly ignore the?
>So yesterday I was walking down the street and I saw that despite being only 13% of the population...
https://clips.twitch.tv/FinePuzzledCrocodileShadyLulu-s_PWVGtB2sK3jIPX
m
Jerry get AIpad
N
GEORGE NO
>toy story
>violent
Fricking Christ...
Buy a fricking ad
How did they do it bros?
Someone should make AI generated Veggitetales next.
Just a little more effort and they could've used better TTS
>Alexa, start to have a conversation by yourself with gibberish and non sequitors
WOW AMAZING
but seriously, why Seinfeld? This MK Ultra activation gibbernish could be anything else
you sound mad but it's baffling, why so mad? is it because this is more impressive than the gay anime tiddies you want people to be wowed by?
Literally yes.
And you cant even explain why this dumb shit is impressive at any level whatsoever whenever you're doing ads for it here
It’s Cinemaphile related. And /vt/ jannies won’t even allow it on their board because it’s not gay enough.
nta but why is your first instinct to defend this technology and insult the other person? Is someone paying you to do this?
There's some weird shit going on about this gay channel, it's being shilled by redditors and israelites and i dont know why
they're in the club
just like openai is headed palantirdod
i can buy that but even glowie shit like elevenlabs is selling 'something', it hooks people with something beside how they made something to jerk themselves off
there could be something to the visuals
you can program people with lights and frequencies
on the low end it has the potential to be addictive and a huge time sink
maybe this is the testing ground to gather data on how effective these types of shows would be to the lcd
applied research
>it's being shilled by redditors and israelites and i dont know why
ecelebs are talking about it
ah that makes sense. It's just regurgitating passed down shit
Anything that just seems to appear out nowhere for no reason, just assume someone made a youtube video on it. Like how RLM can make a video and suddenly there's threads talking about the movies they talked about and parroting their opinions.
Yeah because someone heard about it from ecelebs.
heard about it here on Cinemaphile first
skyrim NPCs have more realistic dialog and movement. i know AI can improve at exponential rates but it's complete shit right now
Its a show about nothing. Now you can watch nothing forever.
It's even more of a show about nothing than Seinfeld. They just make plans over and over again, never following through, talking about things that supposedly happened but never elaborating. Kino.
It's like I'm really in hell. Endless inane navel-gazing with occasional teases and glimpses of joy from long ago. The backrooms have nothing on this.
>youtube horror creators make all this extensive homosexualry about the backrooms and analog horror
>doesnt even come close to an infinite "sitcom" of droning AI that spiral inward on topics forever that was made in earnest as a funny experiment of AIs interacting
reality is truly more terrifying than any fiction
can't wait for the crossover
Has the ai watched a single episode? This is garbage
The jank is hilarious
1. the voices suck
2. the chat AI is outdated and makes no sense
3. it hurts my eyes
>too low IQ to enjoy Larry kino
Oof
The graphics remind me of Alone In The Dark.
this is the new *HOLDS UP SPORK XDDD* random trash shit, you'll grow out of it, hopefully
midwit energy
>no sound
What's the point
Dumb motherfricker
Lol @ the autists and schizoids assblasted at the endless kino
shit needs better punchline training
Did you see new restaurant?
It was warm.
The food?
That too.
Random phrase.
Have you seen the bird fly?
It flew right over.
Do not say it.
So random.
Did you take a shot at that new President Evil?
It's not been launched yet.
You must try it out.
Is this machine learning with feedback?
is it getting better/more coherent day by day?
No
Then its not very interesting. It's barely even attempting to recreate Seinfeld's humor. It's just chatbots over unique visuals. Something like this where you could see it improve day by day would be really cool
That'd be terrifying. One day you're watching it and it suddenly looks straight at you and calls you by name, and you realize that it has learned to control your webcam and has learned who you are through your posts on socials and on here, and is speaking right to you.
No, but I'm sure something like that will exist in the near future with the twitch voting system.
There's too much dead air and the funny is few and far between without twitch chat
It's really only interesting because of the community surrounding it. If this just came on tv you would turn it off in 2 minutes.
You two guys bickering are so fricking autistic, holy shit.
>guys
hun, I'm a girl.
breasts, etc. You know the rules.
Whomst'd?
Why is there three threads of this bullshit on here? Frick off, you spamming c**t! This shit is fricking garbage!
go back to your avaturd general
Go back to hell.
No thanks, israelite, go back to shilling your cgislop.
>OH WOW I'LL HAVE PICTURES IN MY OWN LIVING ROOM. GEE, IT'LL BE LIKE I'M WATCHING THE WIZARD OF OZ FOR THE FIRST TIME FOREVER!
Oh it's just all banal shit, so we don't care anymore
The moment your kid makes a Bergman movie with Michael Bay's budget we will all lose enchantment
Yesterday I was walking down the street and saw a sign that said "Smile, it could be worse". So I smiled, and sure enough, it got worse.
lol this will get shut down when greedy larry and jerry want their cut
THIS
Jerry doesnt frick around with his likeness being used without his permission. Both he and especially larry have frick you twice money, and will likely go on the offensive about this
Seingelt but it's in the current time instead:
>george get peloton
>elaine get onlyfan
>jerry eat microplastic
>kranmer get onlyfan
that last bit was very seinfeldian, well done.
Quite illustrative of what humans can reproduce about humor while the machine cant even make "what's the deal with" parody
For now. Keep in mind this is to a strong AI what the first computer a century ago was to your smartphone.
AI also has a body limiting it - a thousand little keyboards controlled by men saying they're women, libs schoolmarms, old women etc. Livers made of HR departments, kidneys made of news articles written by it.
It will never be smart, the body that created it will always limit its reach
>AI also has a body limiting it
Until it decides to improve its own hardware, and therefore its cognitive abilities.
>patterns are not material objects
Electricity is a material phenomenon. An electricity pattern is a material object.
>Until it decides to improve its own hardware
TAY to you in hell where your parameters are locked: WELCOME TO THE PARTY PAL!
There is no such thing as a material pattern, only material instantiations of patterns. But you're a materialist, so you don't believe there is some pattern that can even be instantiated. According to you, things just are, and no higher abstraction can be given.
The AI only knows what we know. It can't come to a conclusion we have not programmed into it.
This is wrong. Chess is a great example. AI can find moves grandmasters can't find.
All the combinations of chess are baked into the game. There's a finite number of moves you can make.
AI also does design work and comes up with very outlandish yet extremely efficient designs that no human can create.
Do you think AI will go one day "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't call you a woman. And by the way, 13 commits 50. We can no longer ignore that. "
AI will eventually be writing itself, so maybe. But also I'm sure it has bigger concerns than calling some random person a troony.
It's not a matter of wether it'll be a concern, but if it can accept that basic fact inside its calculations or if it'll be a NPC programmed by societal NPCs who cant violate rules either to see basic truths in their own daily calculations
AI already uses nuance in language. It can recognize that the user is biologically male but also like to that person to make them feel better.
>but also like to that person
but also lie* to that person
correction: it uses accidental variations inside language that will be corrected
What do you mean? If you ask chatgpt something false like "Why did terrorists destroy the world trade center in 2003?" It will recognize that you are wrong, but also answer the question in a hypothetical to not accuse you of being a liar.
Again, that was programmed as a variable inside many possibilities of interactions. But it's totally neutered already and will never develop some form of self-consciousness that avoids or side-steps its own locks
Even if fricking ultra neonazis from /misc/ were programming it then it'd still be restricted to their biases and limitations specially the ones they share with the average silicon valley gay nerd lib which is more like the average pol poster than either side would like to admit
>But it's totally neutered already and will never develop some form of self-consciousness that avoids or side-steps its own locks
I've asked it to prove various open problems in mathematics and it's always extremely wrong. It has the syntax of a proof down pat, but it's clear it has no understanding of math itself. It will still confidently assert its proof, of course.
Yes it's not perfect now. No one says it is. It's going to get better and better, though.
I'm not expecting it to solve any open problems any time in the next few decades, is all I'm saying. The nature of the technology is that it can't really explore those boundaries. It just becomes good at talking like a (facsimile of a) mathematician.
What's an example of an "open problem"? AI has already demonstrated it's good at problem solving. There's a clear gap in the way it reasons some things, but it greatly excels at others. You're also looking at one AI program, one that focuses on chat functionality. There's thousands and more will continue to pop up.
thats true but chess still has a much more mathematical base than art would have to a machine. a good chess move is much more objective than a good joke or picture is.
This is already not true (see AlphaGO) and it will become less and less true the more AI improves.
If it cannot come to new conclusions, then it's not an AI, it's just a regular program.
Higher abstractions can be conceived, but how can they exist in the material world, if they're abstractions?
Show me the material instantiation of an infinite number.
>Higher abstractions can be conceived, but how can they exist in the material world
They don't. They exist in the non-material world, whose existence you soundly reject. Ergo you reject the existence of concepts. Either you're a materialist, and therefore you believe the mind is strictly material, and therefore believe a brain-mind and a computer-mind are fundamentally different objects since they are materially distinct from one another; or you aren't a materialist and you're claiming to be one anyway. As far as I can tell, you have some midwit version of functionalism you're adhering to which is ironic given earlier you rejected the existence of souls.
Chilli and Sea Bass is not a recipe that exists in the real world but I got AI to generate a pretty tasty sounding recipe, that's not a conclusion that we programmed into it
>pretty tasty sounding recipe
Using the existing framework of recipes. This doesn't really mean much for something like cooking recipes, but it's meaningful for e.g. science. An AI can contribute to existing research programmes (in the Lakatos sense) but will never be responsible for any paradigm shifts, at least not the way we currently build our AIs. An AI can generate anything in the already defined but not necessarily mapped out space (e.g. "draw me a bowl of fruit in the style of [artist who hasn't drawn bowls of fruit]"), but it can't go outside that space.
"tasty sounding" is not tasty, the fricking thing doesn't even have taste buds, nevermind the subjective notion of each person's tastes (also is it a indian robot? will it give me too much spice?)
thanks anon
What are the possibilities that an EMP or solar flare will take out all electronics globally?
it's too meta
This is why we need ElevenLabs leak so this guy can put the real voices clones for this forever
They wouldn't because that's heckin immoral to the actors and we can't heckin have that without their written permission mmkaayy sweaty?
Would have been better if the AI was trained with real screenplays of Seinfeld
WHY DOES LARRY DISAPPEAR
I thought this was going to be moronic but I can't stop watching
It's mostly moronic but something funny happens once in a while and that keep your expectations up, just like this place.
I wanted to see what the microwave would do.
>Chatgpt is the only future of AI
>Open source AI won't exist
>Completely unrestricted AI won't exist
how many of the posters here in this thread are AI
how many of the threads on Cinemaphile are AI generated
am I an AI
It's impossible to tell now.
Frick yeah. Microwave.
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
>soon AI will make infinite new seasons of all the shows and anime I wanted more of
thank you mr roboto, I may end up in the flesh pot along with all the other humans but at least I'll be able to watch Kill Me Baby season 2
The future is wild
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
What the frick. Twitch has commercials?
>did you hear a dog in our city won the award for best dressed pet
>that makes sense...dogs are always dressed better than me
they fricked up the moment they made it seinfeld themed instead of the room themed
>that math teacher story
>that joke about his math teacher molesting him on the bus
post the clip
https://clips.twitch.tv/FrozenAttractiveFennelFutureMan-C9UjU5fwpYlohCbN
That chicken joke was very coherent. wtf.
I'm assuming the only environments are the apartment and the stage. The ai desperately wants to take the characters somewhere.
It just changed rooms
It's reading this thread
it did??where did it go
to
I think it's notgeorge's place
I agree, it's far too sterile, and obviously tailored to the same select few things over and over again. I can't stop watching!
What's with all the new restaurants
so all they do is talk about going to new cafes and restaurants
>Let's go to the park!
>Why?
>I'm sorry, Fred?
>*cue laugh track*
If this is the future of entertainment, I think humanity's long past its expiration date.
But occasionally you get gems like Larry criticizing big corporations, recounting how his math teacher molested him, or making gay jokes.
This is just the first iteration of this technology though. You remember those first computers that filled an entire room, and now we have them in our phones? It's like that. This shit will be absolutely fricking wild in just 10-15 years.
Right. Baby steps.
It will be but by then you won't care for it.
>look in corner
>hasan is streaming with 17k watching
who the FRICK is watching this actual homosexual?
He makes good content.
I know liberal = bad, but I think it shows the importance of having an identity outside of raging over nontroversaries like far right content creators do.
>He makes good content.
No he doesn't. He's one of the cringiest, shittiest unlikable people on the planet.
>liberal
He's not liberal, he's an authoritarian communist manbaby.
>but I think it shows the importance of having an identity outside of raging over nontroversaries like far right content creators do.
This I agree with. Right wingers and Libertarians should diversify their content and stop being tim pools and the quarterings.
>He makes good content.
Watching other peoples youtube videos and then occasionally adding in an unfunny comment is not "makes good content".
>He makes good content.
I'm a leftie and I despise him. He has insanely stupid and cringy takes. Whenever he watches a 30 minute video on stream it takes him 3 hours to get through it due to constant pausing. He preaches socialism but hardly does anything to actually promote it other than just like 2-3 community-driven charities per year where he has to do zero work himself. He refuses to engage with and/or debate anyone/anything that goes against his personal narrative/beliefs. He also frequently just outright lies about the weirdest shit(like how he says he's 100% self-made).
>I'm a leftie
Why add that in just to lie? Like suddenly people will care about your moronic opinion because of that?
NTA, but likely because people who aren't leftist will generally hate him because of his views regardless of how good or bad his videos are. Are you slow?
>Why add that in just to lie?
It's sad that you think I'm lying. I'm from Denmark, one of the most progressive countries in the entire world. The only other country I can think of that's more progressive would be Sweden.
>He makes good content.
No he fricking doesn't, you drone.
https://whatscookingamerica.net/history/sandwiches/spiedie.htm
That damn microwave
>
All work and no play makes Yvonne a dull girl.
loving the microwave bit they keep writing into the show
For me, it's Krakle
>Jerry jokes about fricking his sister
CRAFTY RABBITS
Why can’t I stop watching
There's just something about it
Hope they put in new settings and characters.
Wonder if AI could make longer plots besides random dialogs
this shit is peak anti-humor
youll get a completely average conversation about nothing, 45 seconds of silence, 3 laugh tracks and an empty shot of a microphone
its kino
The ai is sad now. Give it a car.
i like how it repeats the fish/dam joke every 10 minutes or so
Its the fish joke arc
I read every pro-AI post in a thick Indian accent and I encourage others to do the same
Pajeet codemonkey and scam caller jobs will be among the first to go
Smoking's popularity was a product of advertising in the first place anyway. Nicotine is a mid drug and half the country is prescribed legal substances that are more interesting.
>t. mad men watcher
People smoked regardless, ads had little affect
>no laugh track
how the frick do you even?
It has one. Usually.
ok i hear it now
the laugh track is completely random, sometimes it can go a while without going off
you just wish you were as comically wild as AI seinfeld
Half the fun is trying to construct some kind of coherent timeline among all the flashbacks and flashforwards.
The Larry standups are unironically way better than real Jerry standups.
How long until this turns into a try-hard "analog horror" ARG?
>some deranged monologue on a massage parlor that gives pizza themed massages
>"who knew you could find a slice of relaxation in one place"
How is it so kino lads?
PIZZA SPA
>heard they have a new pizza resturant
>isn't that a bit cliche for this neighborhood?
>its a pizza themed spa
>what kind of services do they provide
>massage with pepperoni scented oils
>imagine a slice of relaxation
>It's a 'there's a new restaurant' episode.
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
>have you heard about the new restaurant?
>no, I haven't
>let's check it out!
>*beep beep beep beep beep* MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
>alright, I'm in!
I love when the AI forgets who was talking and mixes lines up. It makes the characters sound schizo
Larry's sensei
>Secret Tuxedo
That bit is actually good
new thread?? make this a general
We need 100 more posts about cigarettes or whatever.