>shoots a glock at a tank
>tank blows up
Completly took me out of an otherwise decent movie…what an absolutely baffling scene
>shoots a glock at a tank. >tank blows up
>shoots a glock at a tank
>tank blows up
Completly took me out of an otherwise decent movie…what an absolutely baffling scene
Why didn't the tank shoot him?
>10 seconds god be with you
Medal of Honor Frontline has the best D-Day vidya mission.
That's a Browning High Standard not a glock
it's clearly a glock 40
The browning is a type of handglock. They also make longglocks too but that’s not what he has there.
more like browning low standards you shoulda got a glock
No it isnt you idyat!
No, it's a FAMAS
That's what did it for you? For me it was bunch of people running out of boats directly into machine guns expecting nothing bad to happen
I realise this is probably bait but that shit actually happened lmfao
Well when you get told it's for the greater good and more importantly when your CO says he'll shoot you in the back if you hesitate I guess it makes sense. At least from the soldiers' perspective. Can't say what the CO is thinking.
That was the Soviets, the American GIs knew what the fuck they were getting into and besides, where would they retreat to? To the fucking ocean? What COs would shoot their men while they're literally on the beaches with them? Fucking retards, man.
What do you think would happen to a soldier who decided to sit in the boat rather than run out and get mowed down by a machine gun?
Every boat had a designated israelite squadmate executed in it. The driver the gunner and the israelite would them safely drive back to pick up another load of fodder
It's frustrating that you have a good point (war is defunct and nobody wins except the elites) and then you poison it with inane factionalism that solves nothing and actively pushes people away from agreeing with your overall correct point.
Court martial for cowardice. I don't know if the American army did summary execution though.
its crazy how stupid people were 100 years ago they had no tactics like we do now. they could of landed where there were not snipers and machine guns but said fuck it lets just land where ever.
Don't forget the dialed in arty
Did he actually blow the tank up with the gun or is this a meme? I haven’t seen the movie in years I was pretty sure it was an airstrike deus ex machina
He blew up the tank with his gun. It's fucking crazy.
Fucking CRAZY
I was merely pretending to be retarded
spielberg said it was a mistake because he didn't understand how guns work
he said he thought they just "killed" things, you shoot a tree or a wall and it is killed etc
Nat 20
.45 STRONG.
a glock at a tank
Thats a 1911 45ACP the standard army sidearm at the time. The tank was supposed to have blown up because an aircraft dropped a 500lb bomb on it. The timing just made it appear to happen after he fired the gun.
I don't see a plane or bomb in the picture. Nice try. How the fuck would they lift 500 lbs that high anyway?
Thats an Ar-15 assault rifle made into an illegal Short barreled pistol version which is why we need to ban them because they defeat German engineering effortlessly
Socialist engineering.
>RandomCrits.jpg
That's a 1911 you bloody birch bastird. Take that back now
He shot the gas tank you absolute morons
you're welcome
Looks more like an Orthodox priest
the tank's shields were down
what took me out of the movie was that America is still pretending that they won and are the heroes, when we know the Russians made it happen.
Oh babbys first ww2 analysis. Next say the pacific theater didn't matter
The only good thing to come from WW2 is that it removed 30 million+ worthless slav monkeys.
40% of all the calories the russians consumed came from canned pork rations alone, supplied by the U.S. if it wasnt for that alone, they wouldve starved. educate yourself.
actually, you dont even have to just look at current day russia vs ukraine, i rest my case.
independent american sources indicate that 110% of what russians consumed were american rations.
That America and Germany gave them some tanks and they got them all blown up? I’m struggling to see the link. Outside of Kraut tanks exploding
You have to understand, WW2 is the only thing Russians have. Their past before that is bleakness and despotism, and they have no future other than becoming Chink vassals.
>WAAAAAAAHHHH PEOPLE IGNORE OUR EFFORTS
Why do Russians always like to be victims about everything? Soviets gets tons of movies and vidya about them but that isn’t enough for you fags.
slava ukraini
shut the fuck up vatnagger, moscow would've been overrun if it weren't for lend-lease
Russia would have folded if not for Lend Lease.
Why did the German army have such a high surrender rate
monkies running around with no guns 🙂
It took you out because you thought he was using a 9mm. Colt 1911 is a .45 so ya it’s a perfectly good scene.
OP a couple of shots from a 1911 .50 cal glock can take out a tank if the shields are down.
My grandpa was in the Army Air Corps. I have 2 magazines from his service 1911 but no one in my family seems to know where the actual gun is.
They're pretending they can't find it because they know you're autistic.
op you've never played civilization 4
this is very realistic
The glock was a prototype tank buster. Matt Damon says as much seconds later.
>“Americans shoot things and they blow up and the like, so as you’d expect, they make movies like that,” said Miyazaki at the time.
>“If someone is the enemy, it’s okay to kill endless numbers of them,” he continued. “Lord of the Rings is like that. If it’s the enemy, there’s killing without separation between civilians and soldiers. That falls within collateral damage. How many people are being killed in attacks in Afghanistan? The Lord of the Rings is a movie that has no problem doing that [not separating civilians from enemies, apparently]. If you read the original work, you’ll understand, but in reality, the ones who were being killed are Asians and Africans. Those who don’t know that, yet say they love fantasy are idiots.”
>“Even in the Indiana Jones movies, there is a white guy who, ‘bang,’ shoots people, right? Japanese people who go along and enjoy with that are unbelievably embarrassing. You are the ones that, ‘bang,’ get shot. Watching [those movies] without any self-awareness is unbelievable. There’s no pride, no historical perspective. You don’t know how you are viewed by a country like America.”
It's a bad scene but I think he went a little overboard here
>whining about American movies
>cites a movie directed by a New Zealander based off a British book series
Yeah he already lost me.
He means whites of course. Might makes right until you get nuked twice then war... le bad! Unsurprisingly.
His absolute disdain for America will never not make me laugh. Lately I’ve started agreeing with him more and more
>nooo you can't kill these near mindless automatons created specifically to mock all the natural races of middle earth who want nothing but to kill and destroy
lord of the rings criticism from someone who never read or watched it.
Does miyahacki knows Japan tortured raped and killed their neighbors?
A plane blew up the tank, coincindently
Well if that was the intention it wasnt communicated clearly. Besides, planes cannot shoot tanks either because they can only shoot in front of them whereas tanks are below them.
I thought it was a dive bomber
No, there was no body of water in the area.
can't expect 100% historical accuracy
Why?
in the 40s you had to make shit autistically accurate or veterans who were actually there would ruin you. By the time SPR came out they were all insane or dead, no incentive for shillberg. War movies from the 40s are cool
He clearly says “earn this” to the armor piercing explosive round he loads into the gun in the previous scene. Spielberg foreshadows it so clearly yet people keep bringing this up
It’s clearly shown he managed to shoot the bullet inside the tank’s gun barrel thus omitting the armor and causing the explosion in the vulnerable inside of the tank.
He shot bullets, he didn't shoot a glock what does that even mean. Do you shoot bows? No you shoot arrows
You don't shoot an arrow, dumbass. You loose it.
Few know this but this embarassing loss in particular influenced the germans to build a heavier tank resistent to glocks.
>SPB
>decent movie
it's technically very good. but that's it
tanks are not invincible he got lucky and hit a weak point in the armor
>vampires can walk in the daylight
I was taken out of the film in the first 10 minutes.
For me, it was the jetpack Nazis
Why didn't they put the baloon invasion army where all the bunkers were and then invade the empty shoreline where they put the balloons?
agreed. i don't do it often but i even walked out of the theater like 10 minutes later.
Tanks are like the death star, they have one weak point that is you shoot it just right it blows up.
Yeah, idk why they did that, totally ruined the movie for me.
It was full of nonsense. Like the Germans just sauntering into a perfect ambush spot with zero scouting.
firing through the driver's vision port on the Tiger when it was protected by a huge brick of glass.
American landing craft crew when IRL they were Royal Navy.
Tom Sizemore was bizarrely out of place - a flabby middle-aged man when in reality they would have been 5' 7" scrawny runts in their late teens and early 20s.
Was that a real Tiger tonk?
No it was one of the worse Hollywood mockups of recent years
Wasn't it the plane that literally flies over a second later?
How could he have possibly shot that plane?
The explosion caused by the glock spawns a plane. USA generals knew this. It's like one of those GTA commands but in real life.
If you used a specific type of Glock against a specific type of tank, it would spawn a plane. Incredible, but true.
The tank blowing up was a coincidence. It was not caused by his pistol shot.
What happens if you shoot down a barrel of a tank?