My question always has been: How do you punish diamonds? Each one of them is more powerful than the Crystal Gems combined.
You put them in giant cells? How's that gonna solve anything? They are immortal, if they don't learn anything from their experiences, they are just going back to be dictators in 1000 years
Fricked up how people would rather inflict suffering for a short term feeling of "justice" over a long term reform that leaves everyone happier in the end.
"Punishing" the diamonds means either killing them or scarring them so badly they spend eternity being fricked up and miserable, objectively it's better for them to be rehabilitated because they can (and do) use their immense powers for the good of their subjects.
>"Punishing" the diamonds means either killing them or scarring them so badly they spend eternity being fricked up and miserable,
Holy Based. Also they'll only frick Greg.
>Fricked up how people would rather inflict suffering for a short term feeling of "justice" over a long term reform that leaves everyone happier in the end.
Why not both? The guilty need to be punished, and the way the crime was committed needs to be circumvented.
Introduce Anti-Villains more powerful than them. Preferably remnant survivors of an alien race of a planet they devastated, looking to seek vengeance against the ones who destroyed the lives of them, and other countless species. How they became more powerful is anyone's guess. They hacked Gem tech and shards, reverse engineered them, and infused it into themselves to become more powerful than they could ever imagine. Thinking maybe a technopath alien race, instead of Sneople (pic related), though.
The whole "why didn't diamonds get punished?" thing is moronic. They weren't that much in the wrong in the first place. Pink whined them into giving her a colony and then started a civil war over it. All they did was fight back, especially since they believed they were fighting the forces that assassinated Pink Diamond.
>That's what we do all the time with nature.
No? We at least try to conserve some of the stuff we have, and for a actual reasonable purpose might I add. And assuming their were other sentient species that inhabited those planets, it becomes worse than anything we've ever done. >They simply took it to a bigger scale.
Which doesn't make it any better. >Plus its natural for gems to reproduce that way.
Which seems to have no real stopping point, which makes no sense since they're Immortal. It's just a massive waste in general since they're already enough Gems.
Sure, our approach is a little better, but how much do you think what we're doing now is determined by morality and less by limits and necessity? The Diamonds have to maintain a galaxy spanning empire. That needs an immense amount of resources, even if gems don't need food. Our Terrans are relatively far smaller and so we don't nearly need the same amount of resources. Sugar said the Gempire only met one sapient species: us. The fact they still went ahead with destroying the planet is still pretty bad, I'll give you that. The reason why they keep making gems is got expansion. For most empires, expansion is the name of the game and it'll stagnate otherwise.
>punish
The Diamonds aren't dictators, they're gods. Gods can't be punished but they can be moved to mercy through the intervention of messiahs and saints like good ol' Steven
My question always has been: How do you punish diamonds? Each one of them is more powerful than the Crystal Gems combined.
You put them in giant cells? How's that gonna solve anything? They are immortal, if they don't learn anything from their experiences, they are just going back to be dictators in 1000 years
Fricked up how people would rather inflict suffering for a short term feeling of "justice" over a long term reform that leaves everyone happier in the end.
"Punishing" the diamonds means either killing them or scarring them so badly they spend eternity being fricked up and miserable, objectively it's better for them to be rehabilitated because they can (and do) use their immense powers for the good of their subjects.
>"Punishing" the diamonds means either killing them or scarring them so badly they spend eternity being fricked up and miserable,
Holy Based. Also they'll only frick Greg.
>Fricked up how people would rather inflict suffering for a short term feeling of "justice" over a long term reform that leaves everyone happier in the end.
Why not both? The guilty need to be punished, and the way the crime was committed needs to be circumvented.
Introduce Anti-Villains more powerful than them. Preferably remnant survivors of an alien race of a planet they devastated, looking to seek vengeance against the ones who destroyed the lives of them, and other countless species. How they became more powerful is anyone's guess. They hacked Gem tech and shards, reverse engineered them, and infused it into themselves to become more powerful than they could ever imagine. Thinking maybe a technopath alien race, instead of Sneople (pic related), though.
You can't, you can only change their minds.
>How do you punish diamonds?
With sexy spankings of course
>should of
It's "should have".
"Should've" is a contraction of "should have".
The ' replaces the space, h, and a.
SHOULD HAVE
SHOULD ' VE
SHOULD'VE
Who?
They should have been punished with HOT MONKEY DICKINGS WOOOOO
HOT MONKEY DICKINGS WOOOOOO
WOOOOOOOOOO
The whole "why didn't diamonds get punished?" thing is moronic. They weren't that much in the wrong in the first place. Pink whined them into giving her a colony and then started a civil war over it. All they did was fight back, especially since they believed they were fighting the forces that assassinated Pink Diamond.
>They weren't that much in the wrong in the first place.
Destroying thousands of planets for needlessly wasteful reproduction is wrong, anon.
That's what we do all the time with nature. They simply took it to a bigger scale. Plus its natural for gems to reproduce that way.
>That's what we do all the time with nature.
No? We at least try to conserve some of the stuff we have, and for a actual reasonable purpose might I add. And assuming their were other sentient species that inhabited those planets, it becomes worse than anything we've ever done.
>They simply took it to a bigger scale.
Which doesn't make it any better.
>Plus its natural for gems to reproduce that way.
Which seems to have no real stopping point, which makes no sense since they're Immortal. It's just a massive waste in general since they're already enough Gems.
Sure, our approach is a little better, but how much do you think what we're doing now is determined by morality and less by limits and necessity? The Diamonds have to maintain a galaxy spanning empire. That needs an immense amount of resources, even if gems don't need food. Our Terrans are relatively far smaller and so we don't nearly need the same amount of resources. Sugar said the Gempire only met one sapient species: us. The fact they still went ahead with destroying the planet is still pretty bad, I'll give you that. The reason why they keep making gems is got expansion. For most empires, expansion is the name of the game and it'll stagnate otherwise.
>punish
The Diamonds aren't dictators, they're gods. Gods can't be punished but they can be moved to mercy through the intervention of messiahs and saints like good ol' Steven
>they're gods. Gods can't be punished
>can die from dickings from some monkeys
Some gods