>single-handedly sends?

>single-handedly sends Cinemaphile into an autistic civil war

Fincher bros, we’re back.

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most people agree its terrible. Theres just a handful of coping retards arguing its not

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, it's mediocre/passable. Anyone saying it's either excellent or terrible are the retards.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. People always want something to be terrible or great, but the truth is it's just ok.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's way better than mediocre. mediocre is like a film student film. This was a very well made film, the only thing really lacking is the screenplay. But it's like a 7.75/10, which is very, very good. Mediocre is like a 4/10, which this isn't. Passable would be 6/10, which this isn't either.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        exactly its a film i'll forget i even saw a year from now. Such a disapointment from fincher , sure technically its good but is that all films has to be now ?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >sure technically its good but is that all films has to be now ?
          No, most films don't even acheive the same technical aspects this film did. But it is not helpful to be an extreme "It's either amazing or horrible". It certainly isn't mediocre, the pacing, editing, sound design, scouting, costuming are all done at an extremely high and thoughtful level. Where it fails is the screenplay, which is a big problem because all films are supposed to be, are stories. It wasn't a horrible plot, however. But it lacked catharsis from the main character, like many movies today due. So, in my opinion, it suffers from the ignorance of the age in which we live, as it relates to expression and growth of character. But it is sitll a very, very good and well thought out movie.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        centrist naggers are subhuman mongrels even more worthless and below the Npc normies

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      stay calm

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Normal people
      Torrented it, watched then delete it. Hated it!
      >copping retards
      Went and paid for it at the movie theater. You just don't understand the directors vison.
      >Me in the future
      Watch a few years from now with ads for free on YouTube or tubi for background

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most people agree it's kino. There's just a handful of coping retards arguing it's not and the YMS dogfucker

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tilda Swinton's scene was the best part

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you’re joking right

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah I usually enjoy tilly swins and she was well cast here

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cinemaphile can’t handle film without plot even though they say they like American psycho

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      story-cels are the worst

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      story-cels are the worst

      >muh visuals and pretty colors
      Midwit spotted

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that's what film is dumbass
        if you want a story, read a damn book

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Never left. And yes, the seethe has been comfy.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wtf happened in the cinematography department? was this originally supposed to be a shitty netflix series or something? looks like an iphone video ffs

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I thought it was slightly above average for digital cinematography but you could tell the memey greyslop dull filter was there.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >CGI planes and traffic and fights
        I really wasted my time even watching this film.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >woah is that real life, where's muh grain

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fincher stopped caring in cinematography stuff for awhile now.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fincher's stuff hasn't looked great since he stopped working with Cronenweth.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This! Where are the filters? Put some piss filter on that bitch

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah it looks like a half assed Soderbergh movie from ten years ago.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fincher going digital was the worst thing ever

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're kidding, right? One of the best parts was the cinematography, it was highly aesthetic and at times, beautiful. I'm sorry to break it to you anon, but filmmakers haven't been using real film since the 90's. I think you're more complaining about aperture, SS and ISO and camera settings than the actual camera itself. But the movie was beautifully shot. And to say it felt like it was shot on an iPhone is retarded. It was obviously shot on a legitimate camera, which an iPhone simply is not.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He doesn't work with the same CGI house as he used to. Unfortunate.

      There are many shots in his old movies (and this one here) that you wouldn't think would be CGI but are, now he has the equivalent of marvel CGI.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: Times you acted like The Killer (2023)
    >wake up
    >do pushups while listening to The Smiths
    >grab my bucket hat and go get some MacDonald (for the proteins)
    >use the app under a fake name to save time
    >say dankeshen to the cashier once I get my food
    this is how you win

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's fine, never gonna watch again

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No one cares.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I really don't get what people don't like about it.
    >Hitman comes out
    >everyone hates it because it's fucking retarded
    >instead of an efficient Hitman we have Jason Bourne in a suit

    Now we finally get a spiritual Hitman movie, and contrarians are shitting on it because it doesn't have enough action?
    Fucking zoomers should neck themselves tbqh.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    test

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its bland, milquetoast

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >breaks Cinemaphile

    how'd he do it, brethren?

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    he cute

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    STICK
    TO
    THE
    PLAN

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >was it funny?
    no
    >is it a good date movie?
    no
    >is it a good "netflix and chill" movie?
    no
    >was it thought-provoking?
    depends where you are in life and what you consider interesting
    >was it efficient in telling a story
    no it felt too long and was too long at 2 hr runtime
    >did it have interesting twists and turns?
    no, it's a simple kill or be killed, revege/retribution story. the killer had no reliable info on how hard they would come down on him after seeing what happened to his house and his gf. yes he could have just said "i don't care" and left it all behind, using a new identity and buying a new house, but then there would not be a movie
    >did it have an arc
    yes, the killer finally realized and accepted that he's not perfect and should retire. he does, but the eye twitch implies that this realization bothers him and he doesn't want to be forced into retirement because of his paris mistake

    overall 5/10 watchable netflixslop for the lonely wagie who has 2 hours of free time to burn on the weekend and nothing better to do. fassbender looks incredibly old and gay, especially when he's doing yoga like some pretentious liberalfag. he lacks the physique to realistically survive any fight with the younger and stronger "brute". he lacked the intellectual means of replying to the smug-but-scared "expert". he basically lucks out when the secretary had the exact info he needed. lastly, the client was completely unguarded at night, and was only watched over by 1 guy during the day, someone who was just his driver and not paying attention (thus his comment about the guy enjoying wordle).

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *