So how long before Marvel actually "frick it" and retcon Kamala into a mutant in the comics now?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
So how long before Marvel actually "frick it" and retcon Kamala into a mutant in the comics now?
Never
Is there any particular reason you had to post a tweet of a preview page instead of the preview page?
Is there any particular reason you're crying about it?
Twitter posts are a disease, go back.
>Ms Marvel is confirmed to appear in Dark Web (the Spider-Man/X-Men crossover)
Hmmm
so is iron fist. Is he a mutant now too?
Maybe Shou-Lao is
Remember when Hope Summers copied his powers?
>CURSED TO WIN
homie is so insufferable and toxic
The only reason she was an Inhuman to begin with was because of Marvel execs.
When was the last time they introduced a new lead character as a mutant outside of x-editorial?
Well, anon, if you'd actually look it up you'd see she was originally intended to be a mutant.
And thank God she wasn't.
If she was a Mutant from the start she'd just be another background character like every other Mutant
Doubtful since she really never fully stuck to the Inhumans and mainly did her own thing. Sure she’d cameo in X-books but she’d be one of the mutants that doesn’t live on orgy island unlike pulling a Franklin Richards and think she’s too good for her family
Such a moronic take. She was given a solo from the start. She maintained it, and the Inhuman bullshit almost never mattered in the slightest. The book carried itself well enough, in spite of the Inhuman connection.
The problem is that inhumans aren't anywhere near as popular and important as mutants. Kamal being an inhuman is fine, but if she was a mutant then she would inevitably get sucked into mutant stories and never escape. On the other hand, Bloody Mary is a mutant and has stayed free from X-books.
Purple dude Muslim guy from across the ocean electrical and also her dad having problems because I've been human DNA and her butt again transform and then being arrested for transforming.Also the inhuman eddition of secret Warriors Kamal was in that book.
Frick off already! Kamala being Inhuman never meant SHIT! Period.
Lockjaw puppy kisses never meant shit to you?
Nope. That was a cheap attempt to garner cutesy points, not a serious attempt to make her Inhumanity matter.
That's obviously a newly made up lie coordinating the TV series. They haven't created a mutant lead character outside of x-office for years long before Kamala. Sana Amanat was never an x-editor to begin with
Is that the reason why I'm hearing this argument now and never before from the X-Men fan saying she's going to be a mutant any day now? It's just something new they said?
Also, by the time she was created, the X-books had been dealing with mutant extinction/genocide stories for close to ten years. You just wouldn't make a new character for a low-stakes local area superhero book in the 2010s a mutant unless you wanted them to be dragged into that, and into awful racial allegory stories they'd have no need to do with a character that was from an actual immigrant community. The days of making a new character from outside of the X-books a mutant just so you didn't need to bother writing an origin were in the distant past, and it never really did much for sales.
Eden Fesi/Manifold and Molly Hayes are both Mutants who were introduced in non-X-men team books. That's the closest I can think of.
New mutants (heh) in non-X-Books mostly end up being support characters or an antagonists
All from Sabretooth in Iron Fist, Siryn in Spider-Woman to recently Halcyon in Iron Man and Zheng Zhilan in Shang-Chi
I'm going to say this in the nicest possible terms
Good, nobody really gives two shits about the Inhumans outside some really niche fans, they only got a push because Marvel wanted to replace the X-Men because Fox owned them and wanted movie synergy so they used terrigen mist bs to explain why there were so many new inhumans while so many muties ended up dead. its petty and contrived yes, it's the equivalent of smashing a kid's favorite toys to make him play with new ones.
Why do people go on about in humans making a humongous mutant body count honestly I see no evidence the body count done by Inhumans is anywhere close to human on mutant or mutant on mutant violence like you keep saying the Mist killed thousands but there's really no evidence to miss killed anywhere near that many mutants.
>literally gas characters who are supposed to be essential standings for gays, nigs, and other minorities
>depict them weeping over their dead and have major urban centers gased which reasonably with populations of millions will probably have hundreds or thousands of mutants
>mutants withdraw from society and form krakoa where they essentially keep to themselves
>wow why is everyone assuming that there was a mutant genocide
Maybe write something that doesn’t imply a mass genocide if you’re going to write out muggas.
To literally be gassing people to death you have to be deliberately exposing them to it not have it be something going around that you're trying actively to avoid them running into. And to immediately destroy the mess is to immediately and the future of in humans on Earth. Multiple times the X-Men have some day considered will move in the exchange or stopping New Mutants from being born to be genocide in their eyes. You're putting intense where there is none against mutants.
I’m sorry what, I feel like I’m having a stroke reading this.
>And to immediately destroy the mess is to immediately and the future of in humans on Earth.
I dont give 2 shits about Inhumams and never will, but why can't they make another fart cloud? Why was Cyclops the one who able to figure out how to stop the fart cloud from killing more mutants but the inhumans never attempted anything like that because somehow they didn't know it was killing muties
Shit like that is so fricking dumb, and clearly just an afterthought after a miserable attempt to make the inhumans popular.
>Why was Cyclops the one who able to figure out how to stop the fart cloud from killing more mutants
Cyclops didn't do anything, he was dead.
>clearly just an afterthought after a miserable attempt to make the inhumans popular.
It was more like a miserable attempt to create another civil war or AvX style fandom war, only this time between a small fanbase and a massive one.
>Cyclops didn't do anything, he was dead
Back in 2016 he was "mutant Hitler" for an unknown reason, and then they revealed that him neutralizing the fart cloud was what gave everyone that opinion of him.
Have you actually read the mini where they finally explain what happened? He was one of the first victims of the cloud. Emma made everyone think he was the one that neutralized one of the two clouds, but he was already dead by then. For some reason people keep insisting he was still alive, either so they can give him the achievement of stopping one of the two clouds, or so they can blame Black Bolt for 'killing' him. But he wasn't even there, he was already dead.
And considering the fact that the Inhumans cannot make new crystals now, existence Cyclops did to one of the clouds if it happened to both of them at that point it would have destroyed the inhuman future on planet which by the X-Men definition of no more new ones of us is complete genocide the X-Men themselves with a committed genocidethe cloud was not an option that was going to give them any ability to make new crystals.
And what fake existence Cyclops did to one of the clouds if it happened to both of them at that point it would have destroyed the inhuman future on planet which by the X-Men definition of no more new ones of us is completely genocide the X-Men themselves with a committed genocide. Also Marvels comic book make us connected side for months what Cyclops was supposed to have done to be called mutant Hitler and in the Emma Frost mine raping people including people who want to accomplish as in fake Cyclops action who did end up calling him using Hitler dead effect a lot of what would have happened
.And also the X-man solution in Envy humans versus X-Men involved that device get would make the Mist into crystals AKA solve the problem and then they wanted to destroy those crystals which they could have just solved the problem of the Miss probably months before that at that point.
>while so many muties ended up dead
Three existing named characters died, and two of them came back.
How in the hell do you possibly think there were "hundreds or thousands of mutants" in every major city in 2010s Marvel? You're getting angry over something you think was "implied" when they did nothing of the sort because there simply weren't that many of them.
Wooah named characters
Mutants are what 1% .1% of the population in 616? So in a highly dense urban environment would be around 10k to 1k in a city of a million people. So I decided to be generous and go with an even lower estimate of .01% of the population which would be roughly 100 per city.
>Mutants are what 1% .1% of the population in 616?
Where are you getting that from? In the 60s-70s there were well under 100 known mutants in the world, by the 90s the number had crept up to a few thousand worldwide. The 2001-2004 era is the only time there were ever more than that, and it was never even explained how that happened. From 2005 to 2012 there were about 200 left, and after AvX the numbers started to increase again, but they're nowhere close to 1% of the total population of the planet.
People want to pretend the early 2000s era when there were millions of mutants is the norm, but it never was. Even now the population is still in the thousands, mostly all on Krakoa.
You’re forgetting the difference between must active powered mutants and people who have an x gene
Back before some moron came up with the "X-gene" idea, they used to call that "latent mutants", people whose children MIGHT end up being mutants, but latent mutants wouldn't develop powers themselves without some external factor causing them to manifest (Polaris used to be one until they retconned her origin). There was never really a hard number on those, and modern Marvel largely abandoned the concept so you either have an X-gene and are a mutant or you don't have one and aren't. There aren't large numbers of people out there with an X-gene but no powers.
>not liking the INHUMAN MASTER RACE
For shame, anon.
I'm waiting for the retcon where she's revealed to be a multiversal cosmic entity.
Didnt they already do that
Yeah, she was possessed by Gennis-Vel?
What, this? That's just a cosmically-aware Kamala. Don't recall anything about possession.
Oh rip, she was just rocking our boy’s look
Soon hopefully. Her being an Inhuman never made much sense or amounted to anything either. It was always such blatant synergy move pushed by editorial when they were butthurt about the X-Men movie rights, and somehow thought the comics were doing promotional work for fox when, if anything, it was the exact opposite, and they should have been pushing X-Men way harder due to the exposure.
*ahem*
FRICK INHUMANS
FRICK MS. MARVEL
Thanks for listening
Are they going to allow her on their sex island? that's too haram for her.
If she's a minor, she can get out of going to the orgies so long as she agrees to get indoctrinated and radicalized by Exodus instead.
Eventually
Inhumans are mutants. So are x-gene mutants for that matter as of this year again (that had been retconned for a while).
Although it's a jump ball whether or not the x-gene actually fricking causes mutations or just keeps them from killing you because Marvel writers are fricking frickwits.
In fact there are literally no non-mutant humans. They're all mutants. Every single damn one. Deviants fricked their way through humanity so there's no mainline humans left.
>but what about flatscans
Flatscans were retconned into mutantions of the mainline necrofluid humans years ago.
>causes mutations
causes mutant powers*
Like for whatever reason there's a concentration of Deviant DNA in x-gene mutant settlements, which would suggest the x-gene is from the Deviants, but the Deviant contribution to x-gene mutants isn't what's supposed to give them their powers, it's what's supposed to keep their powers stable. What's supposed to give them their powers is the necrofluid that was incorporated into life on Earth as it evolved 4 billion fricking years ago.
It makes no sense that only x-gene carriers would see power activations (there should be unstable power activations from non-Deviant descendants) if the x-gene doesn't cause the powers, but it makes no sense for there to be a concentration of Deviant descendants among x-gene carriers if the x-gene isn't fricking from Deviants. Marvel didn't think this stupid god damn event out.
They haven't thought out any of the bajillion stupid god damn retcons involving x-gene mutants out.
FFS they had to retcon Deviant and x-gene mutant hybrids being fatally unstable to even do this bullshit in the first place. Deviants and mutants both deserve better than this bullshit. Why do Eternals shit up everything they touch? Frick Kirby!
As soon as it looks like they can spin money out of it