She’s still stretchy. She’s just a mutant now, and female mutants love playing touchy geeky with each without boundaries. Claremont called it the “ultimate intimacy.”
>She’s still stretchy.
For now, but it's no secret that Marvel never liked Kamala being a shapeshifter. They consider that a superpower reserved for villains only.
Normies don't even remember there was an Inhumans tv show, it didn't really have any lasting impact at all. It's not such a tainted brand that they couldn't have tried again in the MCU. It's more that Inhumans was the thing Ike wanted to do, so even years after his victory over Ike, Kevin Feige doesn't want to touch the thing Ike liked. Whether it's a good idea or not (it's really really not) they're inserting mutants into the MCU, and making Kamala one in a last-minute reveal was a way of trying to get some more attention on her show after it was already over.
In comics the only people still seething about the Inhumans are X-Men fandom, but Marvel editorial appear perfectly willing to just drop and ignore the Inhumans just to appease uppity entitled X-gays with persecution complexes, as if they were actually keeping Marvel in business like they always think they are. Nobody knows how long that's going to go on for. The comics have turned Kamala into a mutant in some terribly executed MCU synergy, and it's yet another effort at making her succeed after her previous books failed.
>It's not such a tainted brand that they couldn't have tried again in the MCU
they literally had Anson Mount back as Black Bolt in the biggest MCU movie of 2022
doubt it's supposed to be synergy turning her into a mutant, nobody irl gives a shit about what comics print and even marvel doesn't seem to give a shit what happens to the X-Men brand in print, plus the only mutant who's been seen in the MCU so far is Professor X (and not the younger one who'd have made sense if they wanted continuity for future movies); you can't really draw on that as evidence they're going to go full mutants any more than you could use Black Bolt's appearance as evidence of full Inhumans coming soon
suspect she's just a forgotten character in comics because everything is so low-selling across the market it doesn't really matter what they do; it's more like MCU fanfic on the writers' part than synergy, since nobody's fricking talking to them from the studio anyway
>Claremont called it the “ultimate intimacy.”
When you say "it" what do you mean, because Claremont was such a freak I think that could apply to a dozen different things.
She’s still stretchy. She’s just a mutant now, and female mutants love playing touchy geeky with each without boundaries. Claremont called it the “ultimate intimacy.”
>She’s still stretchy.
For now, but it's no secret that Marvel never liked Kamala being a shapeshifter. They consider that a superpower reserved for villains only.
Inappropiate contact, lusting over minors and mind corruption are considered ancient traditions of the mutantfolk.
So they're going to stretch her out to the limit on Krakoa?
That seems very needless, she was already an inhuman.
The Inhumans brand is super burned at the moment so they want to distance her from it.
Normies don't even remember there was an Inhumans tv show, it didn't really have any lasting impact at all. It's not such a tainted brand that they couldn't have tried again in the MCU. It's more that Inhumans was the thing Ike wanted to do, so even years after his victory over Ike, Kevin Feige doesn't want to touch the thing Ike liked. Whether it's a good idea or not (it's really really not) they're inserting mutants into the MCU, and making Kamala one in a last-minute reveal was a way of trying to get some more attention on her show after it was already over.
In comics the only people still seething about the Inhumans are X-Men fandom, but Marvel editorial appear perfectly willing to just drop and ignore the Inhumans just to appease uppity entitled X-gays with persecution complexes, as if they were actually keeping Marvel in business like they always think they are. Nobody knows how long that's going to go on for. The comics have turned Kamala into a mutant in some terribly executed MCU synergy, and it's yet another effort at making her succeed after her previous books failed.
MCU synergy is really the fricking worst, especially what it does to the costumes.
>It's not such a tainted brand that they couldn't have tried again in the MCU
they literally had Anson Mount back as Black Bolt in the biggest MCU movie of 2022
doubt it's supposed to be synergy turning her into a mutant, nobody irl gives a shit about what comics print and even marvel doesn't seem to give a shit what happens to the X-Men brand in print, plus the only mutant who's been seen in the MCU so far is Professor X (and not the younger one who'd have made sense if they wanted continuity for future movies); you can't really draw on that as evidence they're going to go full mutants any more than you could use Black Bolt's appearance as evidence of full Inhumans coming soon
suspect she's just a forgotten character in comics because everything is so low-selling across the market it doesn't really matter what they do; it's more like MCU fanfic on the writers' part than synergy, since nobody's fricking talking to them from the studio anyway
^touchy feely
>Claremont called it the “ultimate intimacy.”
When you say "it" what do you mean, because Claremont was such a freak I think that could apply to a dozen different things.
So what even was the point of this?
To shove her into the inescapable black hole that is the X-books and never speak of her again.
I see
Looks better drawn without that dumb forced perspective gimmick. It just made her hands look big anyway.
still is
Is that fingoria?
remember the X-Men? they ruin everything they touch!