So... they are not even hiding it anymore?

So... they are not even hiding it anymore?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they never did

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ...they?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, ~~*they*~~. Rhymes with bike and alliterates with kite.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Mites? They are very tiny, how are they related?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      VOUS SAVEZ QUI

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ever since I saw Emma Stone for the first time in that Spiderman movie, I always wanted to gouge her eyes out.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How did you not see Superbad, Zombieland or Easy A?
      Is this board really just people who watch superhero movies and people who shout KINO when they see an auteur?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Superbad, Zombieland or Easy A
        That's no better anon.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Anything is better than capeshit

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, like 16 years ago. You know, when she should have gotten naked. Instead we got sad post-wall breasts.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I've never seen Superbad or Easy A.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Movie that does the bidding of Moloch

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hiding what?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the sausage

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Women's entire existence revolves around sex.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Her sad boobies.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >transplant brain of infant into fully grown womans body
      >that abominations entire life revolves around being railed constantly

      what do you think?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >replace woman's brain with the brain of a baby
        so what's changed?

        >yeah that must be why rape is so psychologically damaging.
        Turns out it isn't, women just claim that to be victims despite the whole society revolving around pleasing them.

        >It also shows that sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal.
        yeah that must be why rape is so psychologically damaging.
        "he forced me to relax, officer"

        Normalizing pedo shit as usual

        It’s anti age gap propaganda not anything else

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Wait a minute, is that really what this movie is about? Wtf

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How is that "normalising paedophilia" though? Doesn't that just follow that adults who frick lots are childish for some reason, whether low intellect (Black folk) or emotionally stunted due to childhood abuse (gays, bawds, trannies)

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Everything terminally online people don't like is pedophilia. Try and keep up.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Normalizing pedo shit as usual

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The sexualization of children has already been completely normalized
        now you being able to frick said kid will never be until something far worse can be made up for blackmail/control

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You still can only somewhat get away with fricking kids if you're super rich. As always. I don't know where the frick do you live where people get away with fricking children on daily basis.
          Id you're talking about shit like drag queen children shows, I think you're just ignoring that basically everyone is outraged about it. Twitter homosexuals defending it are not real life.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How is it normalized when people thinking dating 18-22 year olds is actual pedophila

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >people thinking dating 18-22 year olds is actual pedophila
            maybe if you're a 40 year old fart, in that case it actually kinda is.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You proved my point. Even on Cinemaphile the word pedo is watered down so much that 40 and 22 is considered pedophila

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              18+, troony

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >How is it normalized when people thinking dating 18-22 year olds is actual pedophila
            They only think that if you're white.

            If you're israelite you're free to rape the ever loving FRICK out of your adopted Asian daughter - Woody Allen.
            If you're a israelite you can also slaughter your own wife - Roman Polanski and people will applaud you lmao.
            If you're a israelite you can keep raping and murdering children on your set and still be revered as god - Steven Spielberg.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              QRD on Spielberg?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >be me
            >be pushing 40
            >haven't fricked anything older than 24 in over a decade
            >literally celebrated my 36th birthday by fricking an 18 y/o, to enjoy the novelty of fricking someone half my age
            The only people who hate on me are roasties and losers who put a ring on roasties. As always, those who matter don't mind, and those who mind? They don't matter. A consenting adult is a consenting adult, period, end of, anything you hear to the contrary is literally just a psyop to control men masquerading as moral indignation. Also, every woman, and I do mean every woman, who has had the audacity to hit me with the oh-so-original criticism of "you just can't get a woman your age" is presently dying alone, surrounded by cats.

            Imagine being a woman, then imagine riding the wiener carousel into the sunset, then imagine having the audacity to assume the caliber of man you want would ever give you the rest of his life when you can't even offer up your best years. Disregard these roasties, and their enablers. Give zero shits about what is "normal." Normal is getting divorced twice, never seeing your kids, and making lateral moves from the cradle to the grave. Don't be normal. Be exceptional. Be the man other men wish they could've become.

            KEEP CALM
            AND
            CUM INSIDE 18 Y/O PUSSY

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              and then everyone clapped

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                KEEP CALM
                AND
                CUM INSIDE 18 Y/O PUSSY

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, I don't want to spend the next 20 years paying child support.

                Peddle your pasta somewhere else, virgin.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I didn't know I was in r/thathappened

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              incredibly based. the whole "you just can't get a woman your age" really tries to imply that men are SO desperate for women over 28 and they're reduced to dating young hot 18 year olds when they really don't want to lol

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no one wants to frick you now, no one's gonna want to frick you once you're a geriatric 40 year old. nothing will change. you can keep huffing the "I'm gonna get game once I'm older" copium if it helps you not have a nice day at some point in your thirties, though.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Incel negativism is just laziness/fear of sex, Frick a prostitute or a fatty. If you get a job and isn't repulsive you can find women in your 40s easily

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                why do age gaps anger you so much? are you a zoomer incel or millennial women scared of competition? if you're a zoomer homie wait until the next generation is 18 as every generation before you did. if you're a 30 year old women then date a boomer who thinks you're still young and hot

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Based. Post-Wall women can't compete with tight 18 year old pussy, and once AI sexbots reach the market it will be over for women in general.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                First models will be expensive, it will be some time before economies of scale kick in. I hope you're saving enough money for your Sucky Sucky Sakura 3000, anons.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Humiliation ritual

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That sex is actually a good thing.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My psychologist asked me to watch this movie with her

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is she hot?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You should watch it with her.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >My psychologist asked me to watch this movie with her

      It unironically sounds like she wants to frick you, no shitposting. It’s a very sexual movie and a strange pick for two people with a professional relationship unless there’s deeper intention

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You need a new psychologist

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      My wife and her boyfriend said it was mid

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We all know what they ritualistically do to their own infants, why are people surprised by everything else they do?

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why was this dumb movie even made

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      comms

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cool it with the antisemitism

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You mean the sexual awakening thing? What the movie shows (persuasively) is that arousal/orgasm are purely physical-- a body that's physically ready will experience them.
    It also shows that sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal.
    The ideological 2nd part (Bella championing the poor, fighting against the cliche bad husband etc) is what feels forced/cringe.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It also shows that sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal.
      yeah that must be why rape is so psychologically damaging.
      "he forced me to relax, officer"

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >yeah that must be why rape is so psychologically damaging.
        The premise of sexual relations is mutual consent. People are horny and have sex with each other.
        Bringing rape into the discussion is therefore weird, not least because the narrative around rape is often insincere, and not just because of 1-the data showing that most women orgasm while being raped (which once again points to the physical reality of sex), but also because 2-some shitheads tried to turn bitterness, recklessness or regretfulness retroactively into "rape".
        Fortunately the law's finally becoming more skeptical about these often questionable accusations.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >he forced me to ride a rollercoaster against my will, officer

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Exactly. Or else, I rode the rollercoaster multiple times, traveled in order to ride it but now I have come to the conclusion it was rape.
            That was literally the "accusation" against some celeb (some actor)-- some woman had sex with him many times, traveled in order to be with him, slept on his apartment IN HIS BED several times and now, years after, tried to define is as le rape.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If sex is just a relaxing recreational activity, then rape - or even encounters that fall slightly short of rape - cannot be very serious. If a friend wanted you to play cards with him and you didn't feel like it but he kept insisting and eventually pressured you into it even though it was clear to both of you that you really didn't want to, it wouldn't be an especially traumatizing event. Sure, you might not want to hang around him much anymore. But you'd hardly be likely to feel sick when seeing a deck of cards, and, and you certainly wouldn't think of reporting him to the police.

          The reason sexual encounters - even ones that arguably fall just short of rape, like the simile above - can leave women feeling so shit psychologically is precisely because sex isn't just any other recreational activity. It involves a level of vulnerability, intimacy and trust that immediately makes it far more morally serious. It involves, for want of a better word, the soul in ways that most ordinary activities just don't.

          If sex was just another fun, relaxing recreational activity then former-prostitutes wouldn't so often feel as crummy as they do about what they did. If you had a job that was genuinely a recreational, relaxing activity like playing a game or a musical instrument, you wouldn't feel this. This is why "sex-work is work" is a such a bullshit slogan.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >If sex is just a relaxing recreational activity, then rape - or even encounters that fall slightly short of rape - cannot be very serious.
            Women who initially resist but give in or women who willingly frick men who are in positions of power over them are obviously NOT raped.
            >If sex was just another fun, relaxing recreational activity then former-prostitutes wouldn't so often feel as crummy as they do about what they did.
            Because mutual attraction is an underlying premise of good sex. Prostitutes and porn actors come all the time if they're fricking ppl they find attractive and/or good in bed.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Because mutual attraction is an underlying premise of good sex. Prostitutes and porn actors come all the time if they're fricking ppl they find attractive and/or good in bed.

              His point was not about any particular sexual experience, but the overall state of mind and soul of people after working in those fields.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the overall state of mind and soul of people after working in those fields.
                It's an extrapolation since most people don't become hookers/porn stars, they simply realize that the reality of sex can be casual and unburdened. That's why the movie connected with audiences-- deep down, more and more people realize/acknowledge that having sex is no big deal and people are generally horny, so why not?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. goldbergsteinowitz

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Oh look it's le joos ad hominem cop-out. The novel's writer, the director, the screenwriter, the producers and the main actress are all white though.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not an extrapolation, most people in those fields end up miserable. And women who do it for free end up in a very similar spot. Its almost like...there is a cost to all this ''free fun'' huh? But hey, its your life, roastie, do whatever you want and face the consequences.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It's not an extrapolation, most people in those fields end up miserable.
                It is an extrapolation inasmuch as prostitutes/porn stars are just a tiny fringe of society, and their job involves sex. For the overwhelming majority of people, sex is (or is seen as) a fun activity that you engage in willingly with willing people and move on to do other stuff.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > For the overwhelming majority of people, sex is (or is seen as) a fun activity that you engage in willingly with willing people and move on to do other stuff.

                And how has that been working for society?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >And how has that been working for society?
                As much as I enjoy a tradlarp, brothels, premarital sex and teenage pregnancy were all things that happened in the 19th century too. In fact prostitution was probably more widely accepted in the 19th century than it is now.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's not the point, no one is arguing that people lived perfectly virtuous lives in the good old days. But its clear you're not arguing in good faith here. Broken families, single parent families, high levels of STDs, pregnancies out of marriage, abortions, divorce and in general high levels of unfulfilling, unhealthy degeneracy doesn't make for better people and a better society. You're probably too far gone to acknowledge any of that, I already wasted more time than I should here. Just remember, in the future: you chose this. All that is comings is your own fault, you did it to yourself.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All of this is because of birth control

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Feminism, hippies and their ''sexual liberation'', and progressive ''intellectuals'' from the left. The world is just now starting to wake up for all their bullshit.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                True but without birth control this level of degeneracy would not be possible

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If anything, after say 3 decades (since the AIDS epidemic) of prudishness having some traction, it's fizzling out because of cultural and social factors.
                The male gaze discourse has been left behind as internet exhibitionism (and the ubiquity of explicit porn) made it outdated.
                There seems to be a strong YOLO feeling around that makes sexual liberation a type of defiant expression of individuality, which is even more emphasized as a reaction against previous generations.
                Even if there are zoomers who don't have much sex, they seem to detest and reject both activists and prudes and endorse people being more sexually liberated.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wow, just like the hippies in the 70's? How did that end up again? Lets remember how well those hippie communes worked...

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Wow, just like the hippies in the 70's?
                Not really because it's also lower middle class/middle class/rich women doing it. And there's more: in almost all cases, the PARENTS are ok with it.
                Those girls with microshorts you see around? Braless t-shirts everywhere? The parents bought their daughters those clothes. They don't care about the fact that their daughters are ogled on tiktok, ig or real life-- in fact, you should consider the possibility that they silently enjoy it and find it normal.
                Exhibitionism and sexual activity have become not just mainstream but fashionable so to speak: it's not a reaction against the bourgeoisie, it's women reacting against attempts to control their lives (including the feminist ones) and a general sense of being carefree as the yolo mindset becomes more and more prevalent in sexual terms.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > Broken families, single parent families, high levels of STDs, pregnancies out of marriage, abortions, divorce and in general high levels of unfulfilling, unhealthy degeneracy
                And what part of your incel rantings counters the fact that most people find sex fun?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >stop caring about collective well being of society, just be a mindless hedonist!
                Frick off you hylic

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're not very bright, are you?

                >society
                Where the hell do you get off saying society is worse now? It was your traditional values that led to millions of young boys dying horribly in the trenches of the Great War

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                and now the whole lines die out because couples don't get married until prostitutes finish dick globetrotting

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Where the hell do you get off saying society is worse now?

                By looking at measurable objective metrics like the ones mentioned?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're not very bright, are you?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Worldwide, hush-hush casual sex has never been that rare.
                The American strict religious mindset works too- as long as you go out, date, marry and have lots of kids.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you seem to be missing the point

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Since you're incapable of counterarguing I'll just take that as a concession. You have to make an effort and see the difference between sex for pay and sex for fun and keep in mind that even transactional sex is fun for those who use it for other purposes.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You have to make an effort and see the difference between sex for pay and sex for fun
                The point, which you seem to be missing, is that if the sex act itself was no more serious or significant than just any other fun, relaxing, recreational activity like playing a board game or cards, then having to reluctantly do it for a job wouldn't leave prostitutes feeling as shit as it typically does. Rape wouldn't be a particularly serious crime at all if it was no different to being reluctantly forced to watch a movie with someone. Borderline rape cases - where the woman reluctantly agrees but only after being pressured into it - would leave women feeling no more unhappy than being pressured into playing chess with someone.

                We all (at least most of us, I suspect) instinctively know that isn't the case. Sex is something more special than the typical relaxing recreational activity. Be careful not to disenchant it too much.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What are your thoughts on marital rapes?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                moronic feminist concept

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't approve of rape in any context.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Isn’t the marriage contract an approval for sex. A written contract FOR sex?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                for consensual sex

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                An oxymoron.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's been already addressed: prostitution is not the same as daily sex lives oriented by attraction rather than making money off johns. And once more: not even that type of activity stops prostitutes from often orgasming while they're working.
                People who are overly deferential towards sex usually don't have much of it. There's nothing wrong with monogamy but trying to gatekeep sexual activity is naive.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >That's been already addressed
                I don't think you've successfully argued against it. Imagine you go into your boss's office on Monday and he has set up a scrabble board. He asks you to play. You say you'd prefer not to. He insists. You worry that if you don't agree it will affect your career, so you reluctantly agree to play.

                Now imagine the same scenario but instead of scrabble he's asking you to suck his wiener.

                In which scenario are you likely to feel more disgusted, used, upset if you go through with it?

                I think you instinctively know it is the latter. I'd be very surprised if most people wouldn't also agree. I believe the reason for this is precisely because of the nature of the sex act itself.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's because you're autistically hellbent on antagonizing prostitution instead of looking at the big picture when it comes to sexuality: it is everywhere and it is expressed under different circumstances. Morality is not part of it except as individual choices, which is your prerogative.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                of the two, which scenario do you think most people would prefer?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The numbers show that most women do not engage in prostitution or porn. Which doesn't mean the choice itself should be questioned. To each his/her own, pointless moralizing is often rooted in inner repression. People have one life and what they do sexually is their business.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >what you do sexually is up to you
                >but if you have a different sexual ethic to me you're repressed
                Interesting

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Repression isn't a type of sexual activity and it's a perfectly valid choice as long as you don't mistake it as a mission to convince others to act the same way. You are 100% free not to have sex or sell your body for sex, but not to meddle with other people's choices.

                why do you think most people would find the 2nd scenario more degrading than the first?

                Because the foundation of sex is attraction and its regularity should be dictated by personal urges.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because the foundation of sex is attraction
                So when it comes to sex it matters a great deal whether the person one is doing it with is someone one finds attractive. Enthusiastic willingness is crucial, in other words.

                But surely this isn't the case for just about any other activity that is innately just recreational relaxing fun, is it? After all, enthusiastically playing scrabble with the boss is hardly likely to be as unpleasant for most people as reluctantly having sex with him.

                So that must mean that the sex act itself is innately more intimate, more serious, more potentially consequential both physically and emotionally than a mere recreational act - or at least any other recreational, relaxing act we can think off.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >But surely this isn't the case for just about any other activity that is innately just recreational relaxing fun, is it?
                Depends. A certain willingness to play by the same rules is needed to any social activity, including sex, and there has to be a mutual willingness to engage in it.
                The fact that sex is more intimate doesn't make it less casual. Hygiene is needed in sex as it's needed in cooking, and being selective occurs in sexual and culinary choices among others.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The fact that sex is more intimate doesn't make it less casual.
                Do you really mean that? Taking the boss's wiener inside her and playing scrabble are equally casual in your eyes, despite the massive differences in intimacy? The feeling of engaging in scrabble despite not being mutually enthusiastic is likely to feel no more or less serious than sex without mutual enthusiasm?
                Do you think most people would agree?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Do you really mean that?
                100%. Sex isn't anything supernatural.
                If you want to do it and the other person feels likewise, you take a shower and do it, then you take another shower afterwards and go about your day.
                People who assume sex is otherworldly or icky or whatever are simply inexperienced/naive.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Remember that if you ever get raped, liberal homosexual.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not liberal and unlike you I have no subconscious being raped fantasies that you awkwardly project out of the blue

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, I really doubt you have the balls to go to a rape support circle and mouth off about how sex is no big deal and they should get over it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Sex isn't anything supernatural.
                I never said supernatural.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I love sex but lets be honest, it can get pretty icky

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Emphasis on CAN. It doesn't have to and shouldn't be thought of as disgusting as some sexually inexperienced ppl assume it to be or pretend it is.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                why do you think most people would find the 2nd scenario more degrading than the first?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >sex is no big deal and people are generally horny, so why not
                if its not a big deal then why do porn stars off themselves or end up being addicts(same with hookers)?

                [...]
                >society
                Where the hell do you get off saying society is worse now? It was your traditional values that led to millions of young boys dying horribly in the trenches of the Great War

                jackass

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if its not a big deal then why do porn stars off themselves or end up being addicts(same with hookers)?
                Because of the obvious difference between consensual sex with ppl you find attractive and professional sex with ppl you don't.
                Drug addiction is not always a cause or consequence of prostitution btw and the suicide cases among porn stars are more publicized, so you try to cling to this as some type of statistical argument.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because of the obvious difference between consensual sex with ppl you find attractive and professional sex with ppl you don't.
                Ah, but why is the difference between those two so stark? There are many recreational activities where the difference between playing it with someone you like and playing with someone you do like wouldn't be quite so stark. Why is that?

                I ague the reason is because sex is simply far more serious than a typical recreational activity, and that most of us instinctively know this, even if intellectually we think sex should just be a bit of un-serious fun.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >between playing it with someone you like and playing with someone you do
                *and playing it with someone you don't, I meant

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Ah, but why is the difference between those two so stark?
                Because attraction is subjective and sexual relations are the nature outcome of sexual selection.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                attraction is subjective and yet most people would be inclined to choose the scrabble option over the sex option in the scenario I outlined. Why is this? Is it social-conditioning - some product of religion perhaps - or is it something inherent in the sex act itself?
                Surely sex is more likely than just about any other activity to arouse the passions - not only lust, pleasure, and love, but also revulsion, disgust, fear. Sex is just about the most intimate act of all. This, I believe is why the difference between enthusiastic willingness and reluctance is so stark. A woman who reluctantly has sex with someone she finds repulsive because she needs money is likely to feel it is far more psychologically consequential than if she reluctantly played scrabble with her boss - because unlike sex, scrabble is truly an innately recreational activity - no big deal.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >attraction is subjective and yet most people would be inclined to choose the scrabble option over the sex option in the scenario I outlined.
                It's a very autistic false analogy. Can you not see the difference between scrabble and sex?
                Sex is linked to a very specific drive-- playing scrabble is a pastime that can be replaced by playing checkers, whereas sexual urges ask for sexual release through orgasm.
                Your attempt to equate scrabble with prostitution is similarly absurd, not least because the ultimate goal of prostitution is making money.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Can you not see the difference between scrabble and sex?
                Can you? You started by saying "sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal." Inherent - the essential nature of something, its innate character. The quoted description would fit recreational activities like board-games perfectly. It does not, I believe, fit sex well because the innate character of sex is more serious, and the prostitution example shows us why.

                Sex is potentially enormously consequential (pregnancy, rape, or for men: accusations of rape) and even in a world of birth-control where pregnancy might be (almost, but not entirely) off the table the intimacy of the act, the trust it requires. and the vulnerability it involves (especially for the woman), and all the passions it potentially arouses (listed before) make it inherently more serious than a mere relaxing, recreational act.

                Of course in the right circumstances it can be just relaxing, recreational fun, but that fact that it needs those very specific circumstances for it to be positive rather than horrible, traumatic, disgusting tells us a lot about the nature of it.

                With no other relaxing, recreational act is enthusiastic consent so significant. Again, the prostitution example shows us this. An act that has the potential to bring new life into the world isn't just innately no big deal.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Can you?
                Sure. In fact, the comparison you is so odd pointing out the obvious differences feels redundant.
                The fact that both a car and a balloon can transport ppl doesn't make them interchangeable, hence the type of enjoyment sex and scrabble provide has many differences, starting with what it takes to engage in these activities.
                >Sex is potentially enormously consequential
                People who take simple precautions are mostly safe and scare tactics seem out of sync with real life because ppl will do it regardless so they have to be educated by hygiene, condoms, contraception and so on.
                Statistically, safe sex is fine and the exceptions shouldn't be used to make ppl paranoid.
                Is sex within a solid relationship/marriage better? Yes, I would say so and there is a yearning for monogamous intimacy in most people.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The contrast was between something which truly is inherently just a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal (board games) and something that inherently is more serious (sex).

                I'm not arguing against safe-sex or consent. I'm talking about the very nature of the act itself.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's very true. Sex should be between one man, one woman, and only with the consent of their local priest.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's not what I argue.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Sex is magical and should be saved only for the most powerful incantations.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The comparison is totally absurd. It goes without saying that scrabble isn't a natural substitute for sex. Masturbation is in a way, but sex is a very specific pastime and orgasm provides a very specific, powerful chemical release that most people seek and it's ok if some others would rather play board games. Essentially, sex is based on individual decisions.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The comparison is totally absurd.
                No it isn't because the position I'm arguing against is this:
                >sex is inherently just a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal

                Therefore it makes sense to compare sex to something that truly is no big deal at all - something that is *in essence* just a bit or relaxing fun, nothing more.

                >but sex is a very specific pastime and orgasm provides a very specific, powerful chemical release that most people seek
                So specific in fact that when compared to pastimes that truly are no big deal - just a bit of relaxing fun - we see that the nature of sex puts it in a class of its own. A person who reluctantly plays a game for cash because they need the money (lets use a musician who has to teach students to play an instrument because he's fallen on hard times as a better example) is 99/100 not going to feel as bad as someone who reluctantly has sex with strangers for cash because they need money. The nature of sex puts it in a class of its own compared to activities which are innately just trivial.

                Stealing an instrument or game from someone can certainly be hurtful, upsetting. But nothing compared to stealing sex from someone. That again is because the nature of sex is very different from any other activity that can be recreational.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Women who initially resist but give in or women who willingly frick men who are in positions of power over them are obviously NOT raped.
              Oh well that's alright then. Every reluctant, somewhat pressured encounter that falls just short of rape should leave women feeling perfectly fine, right? Except it doesn't. It often leaves them feeling like shit, which is why so many of them are dissatisfied with hookup culture. Sex involves a person's sense of self-worth in ways that typically fun, recreational, relaxing activities don't. That is after-all why incels are so upset not to be having it: Though they often exaggerate the significance of sex in their own depressed why, they (and everybody else) instinctively understand that sex has implications for one's self-worth, one's sense of self, one's emotional well-being. You will not find forums full of people upset and angry that they've never been asked to play chess with someone.

              >Prostitutes and porn actors come all the time if they're fricking ppl they find attractive and/or good in bed.
              Their job involves having sex with people they don't find attractive, whom they feel no emotional connection to, and who they may even be repulsed by. Agreeing to play a game of scrabble with someone you don't particularly like is just not like this at all. That is due to the nature of the act itself.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Every reluctant, somewhat pressured encounter that falls just short of rape should leave women feeling perfectly fine, right?
                Unless they're physically coerced into having sex, it's a decision they made. If it was unpleasant or frustrated that's another issue-- not every sexual encounter is as great as people initially assumed, just as not every dish/movie that we choose.
                >Their job involves having sex with people they don't find attractive
                That doesn't stop them from experiencing sexual pleasure while fricking people they do find attractive. The reality of sexual enjoyment isn't mediated by other considerations or context, it just is.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                again you seem to be rather missing the point about the nature of the act itself. Eating a meal or seeing a film one didn't particularly enjoy is not as serious as a sexual encounter that left someone feeling wretched, used, or depressed about themselves. That is because sex itself is involves more intimacy, vulnerability, trust and emotion then mere relaxing recreational activities typically do, at least for most women. Maybe for homosexual men it is no more significant than shaking hands, but that certainly isn't the case for most women.

                The point about prostitution is that if your job was to play board games with people who weren't your friends, you would be unlikely to feel as wretched afterwards as if you'd reluctantly had sex with those people because you needed income. This is evidence that the nature of the two acts is very different.

                And the point about rape is that it is precisely because the act of sex itself is so imitate, and involves such physical and emotional vulnerability (for the women, at least) that it is as traumatizing as it is to be forced into it. The same cannot be said for being forced to engage in most relaxing recreational activities.

                I was forced to take swimming lessons in primary school. I don't think anyone would claim that is remotely close to being forced to have sex with someone.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Every decision can have unexpected consequences. It's that simple. Coercive sex using violence is rape. Anything else is sex-- an experience that can feel frustrating or cause regret later-- but it doesn't make it rape.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                your assumption is that sex is inherently good when there are a number of factors that can make it disproportionately terrible for people

                i see this argument a lot from cumbrains

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >your assumption is that sex is inherently good
                Nowhere did I say that because nothing is "inherently good"-- in fact, the essential thing is the opposite: not attempting to demonize sex or try to turn it into some type of mysterious experience. Sex is simple and the outcome of a mutual decision. Whether it'll be good or not depends on a series of factors, but the fact that so many people do it clearly show that it's mostly good, fun and pleasurable and traumatic cases are exceptions.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Sex is simple and the outcome of a mutual decision.

                That's terribly reductionist, ignoring emotional and social contexts.

                Sex is not inherently transactional in nature. It is a hallmark of a continuum of actions in the give-and-take of human relationships.

                Humanity is not made out of gay men.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >That's terribly reductionist, ignoring emotional and social contexts.
                Those are not for us to judge or meddle with. Sex shouldn't be a source of fear but enjoyment and ironically that's Poor Thing's main point, particularly the novel: those who try to cling to/impose Victorian prudish codes/control attempts are the poor things of the title.
                Life is short and sex is a pleasant part of it for the overwhelming majority of ppl.
                Those who can't or won't do it should accept the fact and move on with their lives instead of trying to project their own proclivities or insecurities onto others.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah I'm sure if Bella had to deal with syphilis eating her face or a botched abortion causing long term injury then prudish values would look better.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A deleted scene (posted here a few days ago) shows a doctor testing the prostitutes for STDs and later in the movie the cuck doctor tells her to get tested and she acquiesces.
                Those extreme outcomes, which are statistically infrequent if you consider how much ppl frick, are nevertheless important to consider, hence condoms etc.
                Prudishness is often not linked to this rationale, it can be a simple religious taboo. One which people are free to adhere too btw, nobody should be forced to be sexually active.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If you're the same anon as further up, then you argued the body gives no shits about consent.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not. I'm the one whose first comment was

            You mean the sexual awakening thing? What the movie shows (persuasively) is that arousal/orgasm are purely physical-- a body that's physically ready will experience them.
            It also shows that sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal.
            The ideological 2nd part (Bella championing the poor, fighting against the cliche bad husband etc) is what feels forced/cringe.

            And that's why you should respond to specific comments as they are instead of assuming you're arguing with the same person.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >yeah that must be why rape is so psychologically damaging.
        Turns out it isn't, women just claim that to be victims despite the whole society revolving around pleasing them.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          how about I rape your mum to test the theory?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Go ahead, good for her to get some action.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >lusty animals - children: the movie

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The body is an adult woman's. And the point is that sexual arousal is objective, and has an aspect of playfulness about it. Hiding from this fact doesn't make it any less true and most people realize this to different degrees.

        >It also shows that sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal.

        Evil moloch take. Congratulations on you indoctrination

        I unironically respect your prudishness and assume it's based on religious sentiment. But sex is what it is-- an urge. If you refrain from this reality too much, you'll become pent-up and your own kind could become extinct.
        This is something that American white millennials with a religious background have to understand and then review their mindset/actions accordingly.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It also shows that sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal.

      Evil moloch take. Congratulations on you indoctrination

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it also shows that sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal.
      And thats a bad thing. But I really don't argue this any more because women are incapable of understanding things like consequences and responsibly, which Bella miraculously never has any, and simply lounges in the garden by the end because she deserves it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >And thats a bad thing.
        That's a moral (hence subjective and fluctuating) view of a natural aspect of life. You seem to have no idea how many people have a lot of sex and go on to live perfectly normal lives because you're looking at it from a moral angle instead of real life knowledge.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Read Sex and Culture
          Advanced civilization can't exist without monogamy

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I haven't read it but I'm familiar with the premise. It was discussed the other day here on Cinemaphile. It's not devoid of merit and at the same time there's an underlying lesson to it: if the overcoming of sexual repression is a recurring pattern in history, and Unwin implies it is, the only thing the West can do is simply adapt to it without passively watching its own demographic and economic downfall. Keep in mind that Europe had for centuries a very high productivity average while also having a much more tolerant view of sex and nudity. In fact, normalizing public nudity seems to correlate with a more relaxed and focused worldview.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Europe had for centuries a very high productivity average while also having a much more tolerant view of sex and nudity.
              which centuries was this

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Since before the Middle Ages. While Europe was building cathedrals and Venice was the world's financial center other continents (with few exceptions such as Japan and China) were wallowing in mud

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ah yes, the cathedrals, famously built to honour the sexual liberation and ubiquitous gay pride orgies of the late Middle Ages.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The assumption that ppl back then were 100% pious is a bit naive. Marriage was stronger back then and procreation was economically advantageous, but any salacious literature (say the Decameron) points out that ppl weren't saints either, and this type of sexually relaxed mindset only became more prevalent even after the reformation. Meanwhile Europe became the greatest continent of all time despite the brutal wars waged in it. Living well is a concept that ppl from other concepts are still learning whereas Europe mastered it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                *from other continents are

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              relaxed view of sex is inherently anti family and anti natalist.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Depends. If you're married it helps being on a mutually reinforcing sexual wavelength.
                But the biggest mistake behind the assumption that sexual freedom is anti family is that you're wasting time whining about it because it is unavoidable.
                Society has to find ways to incentivize procreation because it's impossible to stop ppl from having casual sex, and this has become even more prevalent after the internet,
                The internet has also caused a proliferation of males who jerk off too much instead of self-improving and trying to find a wife/procreate.Being on Cinemaphile all day is antinatalist too.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah cuck, I'm sure those families that'll form around a openly promiscious wife and a cuckold husband will create a real healthy enviroment for kids.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the genderqueer polycules will surely increase natality and create healthy families
                Completely delusional

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The internet has also caused a proliferation of males who jerk off too much instead of self-improving and trying to find a wife/procreate
                Noit was caused by women being shit

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That moron has no idea about hoeflation. It's all men's fault, as usual. Women can't be held accountable for their actions, that would be misogynistic. It's all so tiresome...

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Incels are often afraid of sex and set out barriers (antisocial habits, no self-improvement, absurd standards) to protect their insecure virginity. Hideous and poor men find women and frick/marry them all the time, even in the US.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Incels are often afraid of sex and set out barriers (antisocial habits, no self-improvement, absurd standards) to protect their insecure virginity
                Or maybe because women found them repulsive and any time they trried to approach them they were called creeps

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's sexual selection. The response is either be at peace with that or self-improve and lower your standards. Incel naivete often involves thinking a gorgeous 10/10 is not only attainable but actually desirable as a wife.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it's always men's fault just keep improooving so you can get a used up roastie
                frick off, tradcuck simps like you are almost as bad as feminists

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Last time you went out and talked to women?
                If you were a woman, would you date yourself? If you were to improve yourself, what would you do?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Last time you went out and talked to women?
                When I fricked your mom last night

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So never. See what I mean?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >dude just find a woman who isn't glued to her phone, doesn't have friends to gatekeep her and wants to be bothered by a loner with poor social skills
                >Oh yeah and you'll be rejected 99% of the time by those who aren't in the above situation

                So easy...

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Stop whining. Either be at peace with who you are or take a step- any step- towards self-improvement. Or do both: Schopenhauer has some easy to read, short essays about how having low expectations and not pedestalizing women will grant you peace of mind regardless of how your life turns out, single or married. But if you're white/Japanese/Korean and have the chance, why not procreate? The world needs you

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >tradcuck simps like you are almost as bad as feminists
                Feminists have double standards because they believe that women are oppressed victims. Tradchads merely realize women are different. And what about you? Do you think women are your equals and thus should be treated equally? Liberalism was just a stepping stone to dupe people into abandoning trad values and allow progressives/socialists/leftists infiltrate their institutions. You are only their enemy because you are at a lesser stage of brainwashing.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            By the end of the movie, she is monogamous. She has her fun with the bad boy then settles down and get married.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The woke ending implies she keeps the black hooker as a lover and the beta doctor as her husband.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If I was the husband, that sounds like a sweet deal to me. Considering how sexually liberal the main chick is, it's probably threesomes on demand.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      pedo

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're talking about yourself. It's called projection.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No. You lack and disrespect personal boundaries as a person, which shows in your assumptions about sex (which is about navigating and respecting them in the proper form). This is common among pedos, who have no boundaries, don't respect boundaries.

          Therefore, you are the pedophile.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Seek help, you sound obsessed and weird.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Now who's projecting?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It also shows that sex is inherently just sex: a source of enjoyment and relaxation, no big deal.
      enjoy hell

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Shouldn't religious ppl (I am one but not a fanatic) wish for ppl's salvation?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Most religious people don't believe in God so much as they believe in a set of earthly rules that can be used to separate "good" people from "bad" people.
          They worship the law.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's often what it looks like. Activists often try to do the same: shitty feminists don't care about women's happiness, they try to control them.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Too true. Most causes people believe in have nothing to do with anything other than power transfer.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Abrahamic traditions = all religions
            Every single time with fellas like you, its so fricking tiresome....

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              If you're a Hindu, you're even worse than anyone with an Abrahamic religion due to your caste system and your religion's utter lack of humanity.
              If you're a pagan, you're LARPing and are, thus, even worse than a Hindu.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >theres only Abrahamic religions, hinduism or "paganism", which I dont even know what the frick it means. Let alone the fact that christianism is build upon pagan beliefs and rituals, mixed with aristotelian metaphysics and israeli leftovers

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                HAH! IT IS A PAGAN! FRICK! Nevermind, good sir, we're done here.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes. Also, you can only vote for a republican or a democrat, both provided by the system itself
                U. S. A
                U. S. A
                U. S. A

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What?

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What are we hiding again?
    I agree the movie was really fricking bad. Any meaning it had was lost in the hours and hours of pointless humping until I didn't care any more of the story or the meaning it was supposed to have.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Whoring youself out is... LE GOOD

    Wow great movie

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it is great

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Le?

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lanthimos isn't hiding it anymore that he sold out, yes.
    Still above average.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's his most unrelenting/bold Hollywood movie in form and content. Lobster/Sacred Deer/Favorite are all more linear and conventional whereas Poor Thing pushes the envelope in form and content. It was a big risk that succeeded because ppl connected to at least some of its themes.

      Is this one of those "it was real in my mind" movies?

      No. It's a Bildungsroman- a type of growing up journey narrative.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The Favourite
        Where he sold out fully.
        The Lobster and especially Sacred Deer are much harder on the audience in form. Not even mentioning his greek period. It's good he's trying new things because that style he used before he couldn't really keep up doing much well, but also he's obviously trying to get a wider audience.
        Poor Things is very hastily paced with often very easy going humour, and a lot of sentimentality. Especially that ending. It also practically spells out one of it's main themes with that 15 minute detour near the end with the ex-husband which was completely unnecessary and harmed the pacing of the finale.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Poor Things is very hastily paced
          Its runtime (2h21) isn't that viewer-friendly but what Poor Things does is flow very well, with salacious themes that interest and engage even those who claim to be against it (see the amount of ppl on this thread whining about the sex thing but at the same time seeming to have watched it all instead of turning it off after 15 mins when the sex starts).
          As far as form goes, the movie has a dissonant, fragmented OST (which amazingly does work) and many off the beaten path visual choices (peephole takes, autopsy scenes, bizarre side characters etc).
          It was a very risky endeavor and paid off because at least parts of it resonated. Made 3x its budget so far, that is, it's also a commercially profitable movie

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is this one of those "it was real in my mind" movies?

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No kid actually wants to frick Mark Ruffalo. Stop this crap.
    Bella didn't do it because "sex is funny" but because Lanthimos wrote it.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't women's brain link sex with emotion and they get irreparably fricked up after years of casual sex with multiple partners, becoming incapable of being happy in a fulfilling monogamous relationship? I thought that was common knowledge at this point. Anyway, women are really, really dumb, they will fall for the propaganda from this and many other similar movies and ruin their lives. Oh well...

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, unlike men who can have sex without forming emotional bonding. Feminist told women they could do the same as men because they don't want to accept our brains work different thanks to charlatans like Money.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >replace woman's brain with the brain of a baby
    so what's changed?

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Disgusting movie, I look down on all the actors involved in it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Did you watch it all the way through? At what point did you find it "disgusting" and what made you keep watching?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A child/infant getting fricked

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          she is obviously 18 by the time she gets fricked, you can tell because the way she speaks is adult by then

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            She speaks like moron, but at that point she already could hold a conversation and went through the sexual awakening, I think she's probably like a moronic 16 year old at that point, and no one cares about fricking morons or 16 year olds (unless it's Twitter, then they go fuming, but they also go fuming over age gaps, who cares).

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You might have seen the wrong movie, it's Emma Stone's (35 yo) body. At what time did you turn Poor Things off? 40 mins? Because the masturbation starts early on in the movie.

            She speaks like moron, but at that point she already could hold a conversation and went through the sexual awakening, I think she's probably like a moronic 16 year old at that point, and no one cares about fricking morons or 16 year olds (unless it's Twitter, then they go fuming, but they also go fuming over age gaps, who cares).

            >"n-no she's an adult by then!"
            Frick off the movie never clarifies that, she could as well be 6 years old

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >the movie never clarifies that,
              its a movie for smart people it doesn't need to tell you as it already does in the way she grows as a person

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              She wasn't acting like a six year old, only speaking like she was a bit brain damaged, but also able to hold a conversation with an adult. You don't need to spell it out for it to be obvious.
              You can critique shit like it being overtly femenist and going as far as to beat you on the head with a hammer with this theme in the finale in an infantile way, but this shit from Twitter with muh pedo boogeyman is nonsense.
              Also funny this was co-opted by Cinemaphiletards even tho Cinemaphile was known as a "dicky board" for some time.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You can critique shit like it being overtly femenist and going as far as to beat you on the head with a hammer with this theme in the finale in an infantile way, but this shit from Twitter with muh pedo boogeyman is nonsense.
                the author of the book was a fricking pedophile

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Despite Wikipedia saying his first wife was a teenager, if you actually look it up she was 18 at the time.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                sure, here's his early self-portrait

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't get it. Are you implying the person with a child in the background is also him? Because that's clearly a woman with long hair.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no, i'm implying he stares with a predatory stare from the dark, and the only face we see that looks back is a child

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You might have seen the wrong movie, it's Emma Stone's (35 yo) body. At what time did you turn Poor Things off? 40 mins? Because the masturbation starts early on in the movie.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    really creepy and shitty, and not because horror elements.
    they insist that her brain is a baby but the body is an adult, so all the scum that frick her aren't really pedophiles, they're "normal" because we all know it's about development of the body not the psyche.

    the rest is a female forest gump, but instead of going to war, shrimping and various noble missions, she goes to various locations to frick.
    terrible, terrible propaganda piece butchering what's left of femininity in the cinema

    1/10, and that 1 is for indomitable willem dafoe

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      True

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >there is already high resolution webrip torrents of this piece of shit
    >still nothing of Godzilla Minus One

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Japanese Bluray drops in May but with no English subs. Worldwide release will probably come out a few months after.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When I was 13, the doctor performing the examination, for some reason, took off my panties and took my penis, without any obvious need.
    It didn't go any further.
    But I still get cringe remembering it.
    I didn't find it funny.
    I don't think Lanthimos has ever been in a situation like this.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's normal, illnesses can manifest in the genitals, he was just being thorough

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I used to laugh when people said things like this, but I actually believe this movie might be satanic.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The provocative stuff in it is the most basic edgefest out there. The influx of muh satanic shit on the board is embarrassing if non-ironic. Did some monastery get themselves a Wi-Fi?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Just because you are numb (or ignorant) to satanic themes and messages it doesn't mean they aren't there.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The point is not that it doesn't have shit that can be tied to Satanism, the point is that Satanism is a bunch of atheist neckbeards and tumblr prostitutes larping. None of that shit is nothing more than amusing, if you believe these morons are going to conjure some Antichrist demon or something you're schizophrenic.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Just stay away from kids, pedo

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What if I don't appreciate shitty movies that try to normalize satanic values in society? Am I a schizo as well?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I like movies for how they're directed not their themes. Battleship Potemkin is communist propaganda but it's also a masterpiece and one of the best films ever made. Poor Things is obviously not a masterpiece, but it has great sets, cinematography and mostly really engaging and often funny story.
              If you judge art by aligning with your values, fine, I operate in another framework.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      same

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is the director a queer?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >While working as an actor and producer on Attenberg (2010), Lanthimos met and began dating the film's star, Greek-French actress Ariane Labed.[32] They married in 2013.[33][34] They lived in London from 2011 until 2021, and now primarily reside in Athens.[35][36]

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        well Bunny's married and he's a queer

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It hadn't even occurred to me 'til I heard the theory last week that a big part of the reason for the trans push could be to get kids on puberty blockers so they retain more childish bodies past the age of consent.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's fricking dark but I believe it. if the age of consent can't be lowered then that's their plan b.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Emma’s humiliation ritual

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >decide to watch Poor Things last night with my mom
    >as soon as I realize the whole movie is in Emma Stone's head like Sucker Punch, I noped out and went to my bedroom
    >my mom turned it off after 45 minutes claiming it was awful and had a bunch of nudity
    >was recommended it by Cinemaphile
    Wtf is wrong with you guys?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      your mom thought you went off to masterbate

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're moronic if you don't triple check movies you watch with your family

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Cinemaphile said I should watch it with my mom.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      huh /tv told me it was horrible when most other people irl acted like it was high art

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I love Jorgis Jorgos and was looking forward to this movie, but no.
    No.

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I watched this yesterday, it was really trippy. I'm not sure what's the take-away though, and through the whole thing I can feel that the vicissitudes of the novel were stripped away and compressed when translating it to film format. it would probably make a lot more sense and be more digestible there, especially the character development. Bella was jumping too fast from being completely moronic to someone who reads philosophy.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There was no jump, she's moronic the entire way through.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        no she wasn't, she was developing emotionally, reading books is a step up. breaking off Duncan was a step. Studying medicine was a step. Trying to find out about her past was a step. She matures over the course of the film. Did you watch it?

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >board of proudly self proclaimed pedophiles and porn addicts harping about muh degeneracy
    why don't you shovel the shit out of your doorstep before sitting down and screeching collectively about an arthouse flick

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the only pedophiles here are fbi, moron

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Have you considered the possibility that boards are not hiveminds and there is more than 2 people posting at the same time, you moronic mongoloid?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >anonymous posting
      >proudly self proclaimed

      No one here is open about their sexual deviancy, unlike Hollywood saying a fat guy fricking Emma Stone from behind and her making moronic faces as a guy cums inside her is the best acting of 2023.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There is difference between being dgenerate in private and proudly shoving your degeneracy to the public

      Remember when gays said no one should care what they do in their bedrooms?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >not realizing those groups are separate people from the trad larpers
      its not that complicated newbie

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most kino movie I've seen in a long time. Shit was so hilarious. When wedderburn is in the insane asylum lol.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I wish they did more with the steampunk setting, they kinda dropped whole angle halfway in.

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    my takeaway from the film (didn't read the novel
    >men try to exert too much control &restraint on women
    >women, like any other human being, will eventually revolt against these restrictions and try to taste the forbidden fruit
    >women will do stupid things while young just to escape the cage (Bella elopes with Dunc)
    >hedonistic men like Dunc have a bane; women who are not head over heels for them
    >Bella soon gets weathered and experienced with the world outside of the cage, she starts to learn
    >the person she was so infatuated with before is now boring, his charm was largely embellished by her lack of experience with the outside world (men and love)
    >naive people will do stupid things until they get the hang of the complexity of the world and humans, and those good deeds will be taken advantage of and snuffed (Bella gives a fortune to two cunning sailors)
    >women will continue rebelling and double doing on doing stupid things to establish their independence in the face of more attempts to control or curtail their independence (Bella becomes a prostitute to earn money)
    >once the foolhardy desire to establish independence prevalent in young people ends, wisdom settles in and they start making concessions towards their responsibilities and accepting that there is a lot in life for everyone (Bella goes to the university, leaves the brothel, and returns to see to her ailing father, and marries a man who doesn't have the charms, wealth or physical attractiveness of the other men she encountered, but is a more kindred mind)
    The big takeaway seems to be that trying to exert too much control on the faculties of young people, not necessarily women, will result in them doubling down on doing stupid shit to prove themselves or establish independence. Bella's journey is a microcosm of the journey from youth to acquiring wisdom through experience, mistakes, shock and disillusionment. The plot also sprinkles that the world 'destroys' people like Bella, because adulthood kills youth.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So more propaganda for the mindset of women should be trashy prostitutes until they're 30 and then settle on their long term cuck to leech off.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yes and no, the film doesn't embellish or sugarcoat the fact that a woman trying to be independent will mean trotting down towards a life that can be degrading, soul-sucking and unsustainable. it feels like a critique that says 'why do women have to do these things to be independent'.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >why do women have to do these things to be independent
          Because they are children incapable of thinking in the long term

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            most people don't think on the long term, including me and you. we wouldn't be here if we cared about tomorrow.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >it feels like a critique that says 'why do women have to do these things to be independent'.
          This is your mind on arthouse slop

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its basically the Barbie movie, for grown ups

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nice script, bro.

      takeaway from the film to wide population:
      >you touch child clitoris
      >the child happy

      >Yorgos Lanthimos become famous by high budget cringe-trolling.

      >board of proudly self proclaimed pedophiles and porn addicts harping about muh degeneracy
      why don't you shovel the shit out of your doorstep before sitting down and screeching collectively about an arthouse flick

      >arthouse flick
      arthouse frick.

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When wedderburn is outside being homeless and crazy and yelling and she tells him to frick off was hilarious

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      BEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAA AAGHHH

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >So... they are not even hiding it anymore?
    >anymore

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >women are prostitutes with a mind of a toddler
    >men are thirsty creeps and simps enabling them
    >sprinkled with some basic bible tropes

    best movie of the decade, hands down

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    liked dogtooth
    thought killing of a sacred deer was stupid
    not gonna watch this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      watch lobster, its great and relatable

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So why is reddit up in arms when they see a 3000 year old witch in a e-girl body but give high praise when it's an infant in an adult body? This whole movie is perverse and not in a good way.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because this movie critiques it. it shows that men fetishize childish, borderline lobotomized women. Near the end, when bella matured, she does confess that she'd be glad to get red of her sexual desires.

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Stone flaunting her dilapidated crackhead body in unappealing sex scenes while pretending to be a child
    >this is the entire movie
    Riveting

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You gays and Twitter leftists have so much in common, you would be surprised.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I dont get what the part about sex is supposed to mean

    leaving parents and family is good
    going to Chad just wants to frick you is bad
    being a prostitute is also bad since it is bad and unsatisfying but better than family and whoring to Chad since you can get fricked more times a day

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    my dad hated this movie, described it as softcore porn and said that even though he likes willem dafoe that the only reason to watch it is to see her naked. i think ill pass

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sex is the expression of a biological function. Different from using the bathroom only in the sense that it is much more pleasurable.

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Kino dialogue.

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Over 200 replies and no webms. Disgraceful.

  49. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're trying too hard to make me less like sex even more. Good job. :p Women le good men le bad psyop shit. :p Not today satan, not today. No, satan, I said no tod-getsrippedtoshreds.

  50. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >progressive movie tries really hard to be provocative and arousing
    >it's disgusting and weirdly un-sexy

    How did they manage that? I mean, if you describe some of the scenes in paper, they should be arousing, but they aren't.

  51. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This could be one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It reminds me of that "artist" shoving spaghettios into her vag.

  52. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I thought it was nice of them to pretend that Emma Watson is still a viable and nubile young woman and not a disgusting dried up husk of a former yeast factory.

  53. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This webm sums up the movie

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yo what in the frick. is this the shit she won the award from? I haven't watched new movies in a while.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      powerful. empowering. really made me think.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >IM ACTING
      >WHERE'S MY GLOBE
      >WHERE'S MY OSCAR
      yeah, western civilization is collapsing, we are heading towards some insane cyberpunk dystopia, except globalized with a lot of brown people

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Goddamn I hate the spamming gay, but that do be lookin' like a humiliation ritual.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm never watching this shit. Just looks fricking dumb

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, such art.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you are a chud that holds up a single scene and pretends the film is pornography

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What is he even fricking?

  54. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  55. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The fundamental flaw in discussing the films of Yorgos Lanthimos is an initial misunderstanding of what the man actually does.

    People take him seriously, as a serious creator.

    But Yorgos Lanitimos is not a creator.

    Yorgos Lanthimos is a clown.

    And all his plots are nothing more than connecting links of what can be called in one word: clownery.

    When you understand this, everything will immediately become clear.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-4mMj4RjLY8

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This pedo clown need a therapy.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not going to argue. I didn't make excuses for him. I despise him. He simply indicated who he was.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the human race is a joke, and he makes that clear in every single film he makes.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > is a joke
        The joke is the film.
        Let God judge the races.

  56. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >torrent not out
    civil discussion

    >torrent out
    unwashed masses think the movie is some kind of satanic ritual

  57. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Theres absolutely no erotic scene in this movie, she is intelectually curious if anything, thats the irony in every single sex scene. This is an actual feminist movie unlike Barbie but since it was directed by a man, feminazis will never accept it

  58. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Whatever the intention of the movie is, the interpretation of mainstream critics and liberal audiences is that whenever people have their sexual awakening, they should indulge in it freely. What they don't tell you is that people start to have our sexual awakening when we are still minors and in development. Basically, the reason certain people "like" this movie is because the message is "anybody should have sex whenever they want, even if they're just kids who are just understanding their emotions, in fact, they should develop sexual emotions by trying it". It's truly a perverse movie.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bingo

  59. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was fun.

  60. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The kino that mindbroke Cinemaphile

  61. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >woman gets infant brain implanted in her
    >She becomes literally indistinguishable from every other woman

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *