All his movies have the same reddit deadpan style of a precocious child in a strange outfit blankly looking staring at the camera and stating ‘I have 9 fingers and run the go-kart club at my private school’ with no emotion. Wes Anderson fucking sucks go FUCK YOURSELF.
All his movies have the same reddit deadpan style of a precocious child in a strange outfit blankly looking staring at the camera and stating ‘I have 9 fingers and run the go-kart club at my private school’ with no emotion. Wes Anderson fucking sucks go FUCK YOURSELF.
>I have only seen like one Wes movie and a bunch of Ai memes of his movies but not actually watched most of them because I have the attention span of a goldfish and my mother dropped him on my head because I’m fucking retarded
Could’ve just said so
Those AI parodies living rent-free in Wes Anderson sisters' heads KEK, hit a nerve
The absolutely horrific figure of the Andersonian child predominates several of his films, not one. Rushmore, Royal Tenenbaums, Moonrise Kingdom, Isle of Dogs.
> Wes Anderson sisters'
God you are pathetic and unoriginal, like everyone criticizing Wes.
> Rushmore, Royal Tenenbaums, Moonrise Kingdom, Isle of Dogs.
Wow, you named his movies. Surely that makes your argument convincing right? Fucking idiot.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Wow, you named his movies
I named his movies which are based on the fucking garbage "comedic" concept of deadpan child prodigy who says and does wacky things with muted emotions, you seem to have no response and are reduced to seething.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Wow you named the ones that have kids in them. Are you seriously that fucking stupid? You’re prideful about your ignorance too. Do you have such little going for you that pick on Wes Anderson of all fucking people? Get a life retard and watch a different fucking movie. Kek you can’t even decide to watch a different fucking movie? You’d rather sit around and have a meltdown? Fucking losers kek you’re so stupid.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
They're contrarians. We like Wes on Cinemaphile.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
This is the worst bait I’ve ever seen. An actual kid wrote this right? You’re a 12 year old trying to sound smart.
Wow you named the ones that have kids in them. Are you seriously that fucking stupid? You’re prideful about your ignorance too. Do you have such little going for you that pick on Wes Anderson of all fucking people? Get a life retard and watch a different fucking movie. Kek you can’t even decide to watch a different fucking movie? You’d rather sit around and have a meltdown? Fucking losers kek you’re so stupid.
>You’d rather sit around and have a meltdown?
not him, but that's very ironic. I came into this thread convinced WA movies were a bit reddit and pretentious, and I'll leave knowing 100% that he makes movies for mentally unstable trannies like yourself. the fact that you get this upset at some random anon baiting is just really sad, like you've adopted these movies as an immutable part of your identity and to call them reddit is to attack your own character. you're definitely a troon, and probably a furry. you have that stink about you.
Of course the worst aspect of Anderson's shitty films isn't even the totally unfunny humour, but the disgusting, anti-modern, restrictive, totally arbitrary filming "style" (is it really a style if you shoot everything the exact same way), which only exists to draw attention to itself.
Oh no, it's not bait, as much as you wish it was. Your idol can't shoot for shit, he has the sense of a TV operator. He only knows how to dress his shots in a terrible, COMPLETELY ARBITRARY (unless you can name me some sort of dialectics going on with his style that I'm not aware of?) little veneer of carefully manicured set design, colour patterns and frame partitions. Absolute pig aesthetics for new york liberals.
You're somehow a fan of his films and yet you seem to have utterly zero thoughts about his cinema, you can only hurl insults.
NTA but (You) seething at not getting a (You) is really funny.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
I'm too busy seething at the fact that this hack has unironic fans to care about (you)s. The point is you are afraid of entering my chain, shitting your paints in fact, so you do this.
> you seem to have utterly zero thoughts about his cinema, you can only hurl insults.
This isn’t some kind of discussion thread. You’re just cobbling together poorly thought out critiques based of lazily parroted phrases from tired dumb assholes who can’t tell the difference between a family drama, an adventure film set in 1940s Europe, and an animated film with talking animals stealing chickens. You’re not worth replying to because you’re a lazy viewer pretending to know anything about film.
>a family drama, an adventure film set in 1940s Europe, and an animated film with talking animals stealing chickens.
And yet it barely matters because they're all rendered in the exact same garbage arbitrary aesthetic system that plebs admire for being "different" without realizing that it's just superficial scaffolding over a void.
This is not a bad question because Wes' movies do indeed assume a certain level of
-pop culture knowledge, which his movies refer to
-wry, tongue in cheek sense of humor.
It's better to know Jacques Cousteau in order to enjoy Steve Zissou, just as it's better to know Stefan Zweig and The Paris Review writers in order to fully enjoy Grand Budapest Hotel and French Dispatch respectively.
If you're perceptive enough, you'll grasp that those settings are related to other contexts even if you don't know which ones, and the better educated you get the more you'll enjoy his movies.
You misunderstand the meaning of education: it implies a broad type of knowledge about your social and cultural world (which in this context means the Western world mostly but not exclusively). You may have a PhD and still be a philistine if you don't properly educate yourself
Bottle Rocket, Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums, Life Aquatic, and Darjeeling Limited are all good. Everything else he's done ranges from mediocre to terrible.
I'm sorry if you didn't get to see these as they were released and they've been poisoned for you by his subsequent work.
i hate retarded homosexuals like you, man, if you dont "get it" its totally fine, its like whinning about beer because you dont get it, just skip to something else and shut the fuck up, homosexual.
The twee?
non mentally ill replies please
The comedy, characters and visuals, but you already knew that and just wanted to complain and b8.
this comment insists upon itself
How do you even manage to become this oblivious to what you're watching? Like some kind of cranial impediment.
absolute garbage opinion. not even remotely the same directors lol
im fucking mad now damnit
It’s a WASP thing
You wouldn’t understand
>It’s a WASP thing
His movies are israelitefests. There's nothing remotely Anglo about them.
I know the word gets thrown around a lot in here but his shit is peak fucking reddit
Its usually a good story and an even better way of telling it. Ive never seen his last few movies though.
Don't care lol. I enjoyed The Budapest hotel very very much.
Character says wacky line with no emotion, funny
>yes I’ve only seen asteroid city
Nope it’s the same shit in all his garbage
You’re retarded as fuck. Fucking dishonest freak.
All his movies have the same reddit deadpan style of a precocious child in a strange outfit blankly looking staring at the camera and stating ‘I have 9 fingers and run the go-kart club at my private school’ with no emotion. Wes Anderson fucking sucks go FUCK YOURSELF.
>I have only seen like one Wes movie and a bunch of Ai memes of his movies but not actually watched most of them because I have the attention span of a goldfish and my mother dropped him on my head because I’m fucking retarded
Could’ve just said so
Those AI parodies living rent-free in Wes Anderson sisters' heads KEK, hit a nerve
The absolutely horrific figure of the Andersonian child predominates several of his films, not one. Rushmore, Royal Tenenbaums, Moonrise Kingdom, Isle of Dogs.
> Wes Anderson sisters'
God you are pathetic and unoriginal, like everyone criticizing Wes.
> Rushmore, Royal Tenenbaums, Moonrise Kingdom, Isle of Dogs.
Wow, you named his movies. Surely that makes your argument convincing right? Fucking idiot.
>Wow, you named his movies
I named his movies which are based on the fucking garbage "comedic" concept of deadpan child prodigy who says and does wacky things with muted emotions, you seem to have no response and are reduced to seething.
Wow you named the ones that have kids in them. Are you seriously that fucking stupid? You’re prideful about your ignorance too. Do you have such little going for you that pick on Wes Anderson of all fucking people? Get a life retard and watch a different fucking movie. Kek you can’t even decide to watch a different fucking movie? You’d rather sit around and have a meltdown? Fucking losers kek you’re so stupid.
They're contrarians. We like Wes on Cinemaphile.
>You’d rather sit around and have a meltdown?
not him, but that's very ironic. I came into this thread convinced WA movies were a bit reddit and pretentious, and I'll leave knowing 100% that he makes movies for mentally unstable trannies like yourself. the fact that you get this upset at some random anon baiting is just really sad, like you've adopted these movies as an immutable part of your identity and to call them reddit is to attack your own character. you're definitely a troon, and probably a furry. you have that stink about you.
the color palette
Of course the worst aspect of Anderson's shitty films isn't even the totally unfunny humour, but the disgusting, anti-modern, restrictive, totally arbitrary filming "style" (is it really a style if you shoot everything the exact same way), which only exists to draw attention to itself.
This is the worst bait I’ve ever seen. An actual kid wrote this right? You’re a 12 year old trying to sound smart.
Oh no, it's not bait, as much as you wish it was. Your idol can't shoot for shit, he has the sense of a TV operator. He only knows how to dress his shots in a terrible, COMPLETELY ARBITRARY (unless you can name me some sort of dialectics going on with his style that I'm not aware of?) little veneer of carefully manicured set design, colour patterns and frame partitions. Absolute pig aesthetics for new york liberals.
You're somehow a fan of his films and yet you seem to have utterly zero thoughts about his cinema, you can only hurl insults.
Yeah you’re a little kid. I don’t blame you for having shit taste.
Why are you literally AFRAID of replying to my posts you rat. Your favourite director is terrible and you can't disprove it.
NTA but (You) seething at not getting a (You) is really funny.
I'm too busy seething at the fact that this hack has unironic fans to care about (you)s. The point is you are afraid of entering my chain, shitting your paints in fact, so you do this.
> you seem to have utterly zero thoughts about his cinema, you can only hurl insults.
This isn’t some kind of discussion thread. You’re just cobbling together poorly thought out critiques based of lazily parroted phrases from tired dumb assholes who can’t tell the difference between a family drama, an adventure film set in 1940s Europe, and an animated film with talking animals stealing chickens. You’re not worth replying to because you’re a lazy viewer pretending to know anything about film.
>a family drama, an adventure film set in 1940s Europe, and an animated film with talking animals stealing chickens.
And yet it barely matters because they're all rendered in the exact same garbage arbitrary aesthetic system that plebs admire for being "different" without realizing that it's just superficial scaffolding over a void.
>anti-modern
Problem?
This is not a bad question because Wes' movies do indeed assume a certain level of
-pop culture knowledge, which his movies refer to
-wry, tongue in cheek sense of humor.
It's better to know Jacques Cousteau in order to enjoy Steve Zissou, just as it's better to know Stefan Zweig and The Paris Review writers in order to fully enjoy Grand Budapest Hotel and French Dispatch respectively.
If you're perceptive enough, you'll grasp that those settings are related to other contexts even if you don't know which ones, and the better educated you get the more you'll enjoy his movies.
>the better educated you get the more you'll enjoy his movies.
I have a PhD and his movies are shite
You misunderstand the meaning of education: it implies a broad type of knowledge about your social and cultural world (which in this context means the Western world mostly but not exclusively). You may have a PhD and still be a philistine if you don't properly educate yourself
Bottle Rocket, Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums, Life Aquatic, and Darjeeling Limited are all good. Everything else he's done ranges from mediocre to terrible.
I'm sorry if you didn't get to see these as they were released and they've been poisoned for you by his subsequent work.
i hate retarded homosexuals like you, man, if you dont "get it" its totally fine, its like whinning about beer because you dont get it, just skip to something else and shut the fuck up, homosexual.
Yourself
The Whiteness.
>I have a PhD and his movies are shite
for me, it's the handcrafted environments
i don't know how he does it