>According to insider Daniel Richtman, Sony Pictures wants to bring Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield back as their respective takes on Spider-Man, but as "key players" in a Multiverse storyline of their own, separate from the MCU's.
https://comicbookmovie.com/marvel-studios/mcu-rumor-roundup-updates-on-secret-wars-tff-surprising-plans-for-maguire-garfield-and-more-a211151
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
nobody cares Disney homosexual.
Wrong board
Tell those frickers to google multiverse fatigue. Spam their twitters with it if needed.
>multiverse fatigue
Doesn't exist, at least yet, no matter how much Cinemaphile screeches about it.
This is the only acceptable type of multiverse story to me since it's actually working with and referencing previous existing stuff instead of being multiverse for multiverse's sake, like the Spider-Verse shit that could've easily been non-multiverse, meanwhile a story about the two guys who you already saw playing Spider-Man teaming up to handle shit is something unique you won't see anywhere else, that also has a hard time limit on how long it'll be viable for.
However that's just the theory, in practice this is Sony we're talking about and they'd frick it up anyway, the most I'd allow them is to try outlier Spider-Man stories with Garfield that they'd never let a mainline Spider-Man do, like being married with kids, Spider-Gwen or Spider-Boy shenanigans, more aggressive or darker stories, etc
Garfield really doesn't want to do it. He had to take time to work out so he could fit in a spandex suit and he has far too much of a career, including things that are time consuming like theater runs, to do a movie.
I wouldn't mind an animated Spider-Man show with Garfield that does those things - being married (albeit not to MJ and Gwen is dead so ....) and so forth. Garfield can do the voice work for that.
But Disney controls the animated rights now and wouldn't go for it.
i fricking hate marvel drones and their cope fatigue. The movies were always garbage, you are just old enough to see it
Madame Web bombed that bad, huh
>Sony is at it again
You say this as if Disney and the MCU have some successful beloved thing going on with their multiverse saga, and Sony are interfering with it and ruining things, rather than both companies doing moronic things. If anything, this is less likely to fail than Disney's effort just because it's playing on nostalgia for movies audiences actually saw and liked, rather than things from 20 years ago nobody except hardcore Marvel nerds even remembers anymore.
Cinemaphile keeps saying this, yet all of Marvel's Multiverse-themed movies so far have been the most successful of the post-Endgame era.
Stop shilling for them. They weren't successful because "it's a multiverse movie". Worse, they don't have anything inventive to say or creative to do in these movies, it's literally just empty nostalgia for people to point at the thing they remember and clap. But in terms of things from old Marvel movies that anyone would actually care about seeing again they've already blown their load. All the other old non-MCU stuff they're talking about bringing back is stuff normies don't even remember, it's less of a draw than any of the things DC revisited in the Flash movie.
>Pointing out facts is shilling because I don't like the franchise
>facts
You're grossly misrepresenting the facts to make it sound like those movies were successful BECAUSE they were multiverse movies. You are either lying or you're stupid.
>Movies feature alternate versions of beloved characters due to the Multiverse gimmick
>Movies are successful because of this
>This means normies don't like Multiverse stories somehow.
>Movies feature alternate versions of beloved characters
>beloved characters
>he means the Illuminati
So you're lying AND stupid, especially if you think that one scene was the reason Dr Strange 2 did well.
Pretending a third MCU Spider-Man movie only did well because of the multiverse stuff is just delusional though. The new MCU Spider-Man movie was going to do well because it was the new MCU Spider-Man movie.
I'm not saying it's the sole reason, but it's a major factor.
If not, explain why Doctor Strange 2 did so well. Or are you one of those morons who unironically think WandaVision boosted the movie's box office?
Anon Sony's last spiderfilm was Madam Web which bombed terribly. They'll take anything they can get right now.
Do Spider-Man: Reign with Maguire
Do a Spider-Man Gauntlet style arc with Garfield, but Peter dies and it teases live action Miles who can be brought into the MCU.
>but Peter dies and it teases live action Miles who can be brought into the MCU
Nah frick off
I like Reign more than most, but it shouldn't be adapted with Maguire, doesn't fit his version at all
Garfield should adapt the Clone Saga, just go full crazy.
No Way Home was a fun nostalgic blast from the past but it should be a one-off thing. Any fun or charm the prospect of seeing Maguire and Garfield being Spider-Man again would be lost if they kept doing it.