Star Wars

Skywalker Saga 24 hour marathon coming to theaters on May 4th

The Acolyte Trailer:

?si=sdWQAoLk2wt60BrI

Bad Batch currently airing on Thursdays.

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just play the lego game instead
    probably take half the time at most

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just watch the Auralnauts dub

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >starts with the prequels
    Fricking trash view order.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not if you are marathoning. The whole franchise works best linearly

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not really.
        Star Wars (4) is full of exposition, Phantom Menace is not.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Phantom menance literally caused an uproar because of it's exposition of what the force is you dummy. Not to mention the rule of 2 etc etc

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >exposition of what the force is
            It never explains what the force is, it just explains the medium through which the force exerts its influence as a means to make Anakin’s condition unusual and interesting to Qui Gon

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That’s because the fans are dumbasses who completely misunderstood Qui-Gon’s explanation.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's the perfect view order. You can leave as RotJ credits start rolling.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        /WILLPOWER/

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >t. prequelgay

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They're soulful.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          this is a prequel board on a prequel website, you shrimp homosexual. maybe r/saltierthancrait is more your speed.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, that's quite literally /r/eddit.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lucas literally enumerated the films to let you know the best viewing order

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lucas also made jar jar and the special editions

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And? You’re acting like that’s a gotcha. Both additions played their role as intended

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Quit being a nerd.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    frick that

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      /thread

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >proxy fight
        Anon, the proxy isn’t a hecking “bring Star Wars back” faction. It’s just another corpo.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I love how this completely goes against George's position for years, being an outsider amateur who's detached from hollywood. What a sad old fricker he has become.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I'll have 1/3rd of a ticket, please

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Okay. You'll get Attack of the Clones, Return of the Jedi and Rise of Skywalker. Enjoy.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Return of the Jedi isn't that bad and it far better than Phantom Menace, RoTS, and, Force Awakens and Last Jedi.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Return of the Jedi
          >far better than [...] Last Jedi.
          Kek. This is your brain on youtube.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Dumb homosexual. The last jedi is the worst film ever created. And you will never belong here. Go back.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Go to bed, Mauler

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What does halo 3 have to do with star wars

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You’re…implying that Mauler was wrong about pile of rancid afterbirth?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not everyone that hates the movie is Mauler but I'd also add Mauler is completely right on that one

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Mauler is completely right
                Mauler is about as "right" as RLM was with their prequel "criticism". In other words: Complete bullshit, no matter how you feel about the thing being criticised. Just, for some reason, people who hate TLJ seem to be unable to recognize when bullshit arguments against it are bullshit. That makes them worse than prequel haters, who at least understood that RLM's arguments were poor.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What arguments of his are poor
                >T-THE PLOT BEING DUMB IS NOT A CRITICISM
                Kys

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >What arguments of his are poor
                All of them. "Muh plotholes" is indeed not an argument, and has nothing to do with filmmaking or even writing. All it proves is that that fat manbaby has no idea what he's talking about.
                And neither do you. You're just stuck way too far up his butthole.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >All it proves is that that fat manbaby has no idea what he's talking about.
                And you do? Pray tell, what is a good argument against a movie then?
                >suspension of disbelief being destroyed is irrelevant
                >cause and effect are irrelevant, even if every important writer ever has tried to make their story logical as best they can
                >the theme of the movie being directly contraddicted by the events of the movie is not important
                >characters being dumb and unlikeable is not important!
                What is important, what the frick are you left after everything is destroyed, pretty visuals?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >what is a good argument against a movie then?
                Well, for one, if you think you need to make an "argument against" anything, you maybe should put effort into trying to understand what the thing tries to accomplish in the first place. Then, afterwards, you can evaluate whether it is successful in accomplishing its goals or not.
                If you instead just whine that the thing didn't do what you personally wanted it to do, that only makes you come across as a massive egocentric shithead.
                Also, there are many ways to actually critique a film on its merit as a film, and, yes, objectively (which Mauler claims his bullshit whining is). But that involves actually holding it to standards established in academia over the least century at the very least. If you're really serious, you'd even have to go back over two millenia and start at Aristotle's Poetics. Obviously, that's not something your favourite youtube manchildren are capable of.
                >after everything is destroyed
                Literally nothing "is destroyed" just because Mauler says so. You should read up on what Htichwiener had to say about little shits like yourself.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Then, afterwards, you can evaluate whether it is successful in accomplishing its goals or not.
                But that's exactly the point
                The movie tries to make me think Holdo was right and Paul wrong, but the plot completely destroys this concept by making her plan much more moronic.
                > If you're really serious, you'd even have to go back over two millenia and start at Aristotle's Poetics
                It's funny you would mention that, because the Iliad uses cause and effect properly to construct its narrative, because Homer knew only drooling morons enjoy nonsense. Gods don't just intervine at random, there are paragraphs where they explain their reasonings and why they will help x or y mortal
                Though I guess mentioning the name of someone like Hitchock or "standards established in academia" is a good argument to a midwit moron like you who believes appeal to authority to be a good argument

                Notice how you addressed NONE of the things I mentioned, you just said "nothing is destroyed" even after I pointed out all that is destroyed when a story devolves into nonsense.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The movie tries to make me think Holdo was right
                No, it does not. Blatant lack of film literacy right there.
                >by making her plan much more moronic
                And here we have another "it didn't do what I wanted" argument. Wonderful.
                >It's funny you would mention that, because the Iliad
                We're not talking about the Illiad.
                >uses cause and effect properly to construct its narrative
                You base that on what exactly?
                >Though I guess mentioning the name of someone like Hitchock or "standards established in academia" is a good argument to a midwit moron like you who believes appeal to authority to be a good argument
                Kek. Of course, appeal to authority only works when said authority is a fat uneducated dumbfrick like Mauler, right?
                When Hitchwiener explains why what he calls "fridge logic" is a completely asinine concept that hampers the understanding of actual art and only manages to make brainlets see themselves as highly intelligent for being able to make a gotcha-nitpick about something that is otherwise beyond their understanding, that of course should have no bearing on this whole argument, because he's way too much of an authority!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >We're not talking about the Illiad.
                Nor about aristotle but you brought it up anyway, so I did my appeal to authority, except mine actually explained my point, unlike yours.
                >You base that on what exactly?
                The book? You know, the Iliad? With scenes of gods explaining their actions?
                >Kek. Of course, appeal to authority only works when said authority is a fat uneducated dumbfrick
                Like homer? Ok dude, whatever you say
                Notice how I never used Mauler as an appeal to authority, this is a strawman you just invented because you are too moronic to hold a conversation
                >Blatant lack of film literacy right there.
                HHAHAHAHAHA just when I thought your posts couldn't get more embarrassing.
                Pro tip: you call someone a moron AFTER making a counterargument, else you make it clear you have nothing of value to say
                >And here we have another "it didn't do what I wanted" argument. Wonderful.
                You think the plan was intelligent? Congratulations on outing yourself as a fricking moron then
                Her plan logically does not work. In fact in the movie it does not work and requires rey to rescue even when the plan succeeds. You can loterally see I am right in the movie, you fricking brainless troglodyte.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Nor about aristotle
                You do realize that Aristotle wasn't a literary writer, right? He was, however, the first philosopher to formally categorize and analyze theater plays and writing. That does indeed make him relevant to film criticism like barely anyone else.
                >mine actually explained my point
                Nope.
                >The book?
                The Illiad is not a "book". But I guess you don't know better.
                >With scenes of gods explaining their actions?
                You mean like the character in TLJ explain their actions? Yeah, that's not what cause and effect means. That's a thing in science.
                >Like homer?
                You did not appeal to Homer. We don't have any tradition of Homer's thoughts about writing. We only have his works.
                >I never used Mauler as an appeal to authority
                Kek. You quite literally did. This all started with you defending his "arguments" as accurate.
                >HHAHAHAHAHA
                >Pro tip
                God, you're a complete tool.
                >You think the plan was intelligent?
                What?
                >Her plan logically does not work.
                Again ... what?
                >In fact in the movie it does not work
                You do realize that the plan didn't work because Poe blabbed the details to the enemy, right? Not that this has anything to do with this argument here. You're once again argue "I didn't like it, therefore PLOT HOLE".

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You do realize that Aristotle wasn't a literary writer, right?
                Yes, what made you think I didn't? It was still a shameless appeal to authority
                >like barely anyone else.
                One of those "else" being the epic that is the basis of western canon.
                >The Illiad is not a "book"
                Oh right, it's an "epic" which was originally told trough oral tradition. You truly did destroy my entire argument with this didn't you?
                >You mean like the character in TLJ explain their actions?
                Their explanations don't match their characters or actions, unlike in the Iliad
                You are THIS close to getting it, but you don't.
                Even TLJ tries to have logic and cause and effect, ALL stories do, some fail however, miserably so.
                >We only have his works.
                Yeah, which speak louder than someone talking about talking about his works.
                >Kek. You quite literally did
                Link the post you liar
                >This all started with you defending his "arguments" as accurate.
                That's not an appeal to authority you fricking moron, defeding a person is not a fallacy nor an argument in on itself. You don't even know what appeal to authority means, you are fricking embarassing. I mean that.
                >You do realize that the plan didn't work because Poe blabbed the details to the enemy
                You see, this is where you refused to engage before but now fall again. You claimed I have no movie literacy for thinking the movie was trying to pass this message, but here you are SAYING EXACTLY THAT. You have proven yourself wrong, congrats. I guess it doesn't matter if your argument have holes though, according to you.
                The movie tells you this is the case, thus tries to teach you the lesson he fricked up.
                But we can clearly see the transport ships are visible and that the planet is the ONLY ONE in the vicinity. The movie contraddicted his theme of being it Poe's fault for being rash by making Holdo's plan moronic. This DESTROYS the impact Poe's story should have on the viewer, as pointed out here

                >All it proves is that that fat manbaby has no idea what he's talking about.
                And you do? Pray tell, what is a good argument against a movie then?
                >suspension of disbelief being destroyed is irrelevant
                >cause and effect are irrelevant, even if every important writer ever has tried to make their story logical as best they can
                >the theme of the movie being directly contraddicted by the events of the movie is not important
                >characters being dumb and unlikeable is not important!
                What is important, what the frick are you left after everything is destroyed, pretty visuals?

                in the "themes of the movie being contraddicted"

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >what made you think I didn't?
                Because you keep treating Homer, who was writer and NOT a philosopher or literary analyst, the same.
                >being the epic that is the basis of western canon.
                It isn't, but nice try.
                >You truly did destroy my entire argument with this
                I corrected you. Because you keep spouting shit, some of it more releant to the topic, most of it not relevant at all. Not my fault you keep rambling on about randome shit and make factual mistakes there.
                >Their explanations don't match their characters or actions
                Except they quite obviously do.
                >tries to have logic and cause and effect
                Again, cause and effect is something that exists in science. I think what you want to say here is "consistency". Of course, you are mistaken about what this actually means.
                >which speak louder than someone talking about
                No, they do not. Again, you're making it way too blatant that you have not read Aristotle. Or Brecht. Or Freytag. You do not understand literary theory.
                >Link the post
                Here you go:

                Not everyone that hates the movie is Mauler but I'd also add Mauler is completely right on that one

                >Mauler is completely right
                >defeding a person is not a fallacy nor an argument in on itself.
                So you think appealing to an actual authority is a fallacy. Of course. Kek. TVTropes-tier understanding of discourse.
                >You claimed I have no movie literacy for thinking the movie was trying to pass this message, but here you are SAYING EXACTLY THAT.
                What?
                >The movie contraddicted his theme of being it Poe's fault
                That's not a theme. You obviously do not understand what that word means.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Here you go
                >mauler is right in that one
                HAHAHAH
                YOU TRULY DON'T KNOW WHAT AN APPEAL TO AUTHORITY IS DO YOU

                Okay, let me explain my illiterate moronic friend.
                Appeal to authority uses authority to further your own argument, for example if I said "I am right about x because even Mauler says so", that would be an appeal to authority
                But in that case I am not furthering my argument using Mauler, I am presenting the argument that Mauler is right
                Mauler being the SUBJECT of the argument, not the ARGUMENT

                After yet ANOTHER embarrassing display of stupidity I hope you will think before you fricking post in the future

                >you treat homer the same
                I am not even going to bother explaining in detail why you are lying again, you can just go to the post where you mention aristotle, then my post where I mention Homer, and see I don't use it the same way.
                You are truly the most dishonest moronic little shit I've encountered on this board in a while, and that's saying something

                >So you think appealing to an actual authority is a fallacy.
                When you just namedrop the authority figure and don't bother explaining why he is right or furthers your point? Correct, it's a fallacy.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >YOU TRULY DON'T KNOW WHAT AN APPEAL TO AUTHORITY IS DO YOU
                You are a Mauler fanboy. The very epitome of one.
                >to further your own argument
                You do not have an argument of your own. All your points are taken 1:1 from Mauler.
                >you are lying again
                Kek. You fricking dishonest piece of shit.
                >see I don't use it the same way.
                Kek. The chuzpe.
                >Correct, it's a fallacy.
                Only to morons like yourself who do not accept authorities. You're probably an anti-vaxxer and flatearther as well, right?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You didn't even try to fight back with arguments on this one kek, you skipped all the pretense and just went for the throat, I have to wonder how red your face is right now
                You could have stopped this when I proved you wrong 20 posts ago, you didn't need to continue displaying your stupidity until this pathetic capitulation, it was your choice.

                >do not accept authorities
                You still don't understand, as an act of mercy, I'll educate you
                Authority is fine but:
                -It shouldn't be your only argument unless it's a subject too complicated for the conversation being had (I will not ask you to prove some equation on a Cinemaphile post chain, but you COULD post a source that explains it if you really wanted)(Homer wasn't my only argument, it was an accompanying one)
                -You should explain why this authority's position is correct on the matter (this is still assuming its not a subject unfit for the type of conversation)(like I did with Homer going into specifics about the Iliad)

                This is a movie discussion, certainly not something that cannot be proven with words like some scientific matters, so using only authority in the form of namedropping is absolutely a fallacy. The fallacy would have been fine, but it's all you had besides calling me a Mauler fanboy, so it was only fair to point that out.

                Good luck on your next discussion, you will need it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You didn't even try to fight back with arguments on this one kek
                When you don't make an argument, you won't get one in return. Deal with it.
                >You could have stopped this
                You could have as well, when I proved you wrong. You elected to keep rambling on and on.
                >Authority is fine but
                No. To you, authority is not fine. Unless it's a fat manchild from youtube.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > LE HECKING YOUTUBERINO BOOGYMANERINO

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >The last jedi is the worst film ever created.
              Kek.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            of the Jedi
            >>far better than [...] Last Jedi.
            Correct.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >muh rigged audience score!
              https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/7/18254548/film-review-sites-captain-marvel-bombing-changes-rotten-tomatoes-letterboxd
              >In a call with The Verge, a spokesperson said Rotten Tomatoes (which is owned by ticketing platform Fandango) has faced a new level of review-bombing over the past 18 months. She said only a few films have been seriously targeted — including Star Wars: The Last Jedi and Black Panther

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Return of the Jedi
        literally my second favorite star wars movie
        > Attack of the Clones
        it's fun to watch

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Its the Disney+ versions so no thanks even to that.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think Lucas intended to actively make the experiences worse, less enjoyable, and down right embarrassed by their addition.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not giving money to Shitsney, sorry not sorry.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good cure for insomnia.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wow so they’ve actually made enough of this shit to fill a whole day now. Cringe.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd watch only the first 6

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i've been listening the audio drama made on the cheap for radio back in the 70s and it's mental how much more, thought, care and attention was put into every original line to convey a sense of what star wars represented than basically any of the 6 films that followed the original trilogy.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    me after Return of the Jedi is over.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you're gonna come in doing the moonwalk to watch the best trilogy?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        no, but i would moonwalk in to stomp your smug moron face in and nobody would even blink about it

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No thanks!

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine the smell

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    24 hr marathons are not fun.
    They're endurance tests for people to say, "Yeah I did that."

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How many people will nope out after ROTJ ends?? 50%? 75%? 99%?

  15. 4 weeks ago
    I haven't been summoned

    The Force has a fat ass.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I need a producer to notice her features and give her a schlocky action movie where she wears 10 different hot outfits.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wtf is she wearing on her calves

      • 4 weeks ago
        I haven't been summoned

        JNCOs at home.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is some moronic 90s shit.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The 90s were based. We should go back. Everything was better back then.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          God I hated 2010s skinny jeans

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Puberty is a hell of a drug

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That’s a basic b***h move that looks cool when you do it fast.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i like how they forced the "skywalker trilogy" by having rey just say at the end of the last movie that she's a skywalker now so it counts

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Sage

    After all these years, I think Star Wars is shit, Disney can even put OT up its anus it really doesn't matter anymore.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The Space Jesus Saga
    Why couldn't Star Wars just have been a hero's journey? Light vs dark? Why did everybody need to be related? Shit makes no sense.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it all started with leia being luke's sister so lucas didn't have to worry about luke vs han, we got the neat and tidy "oh luke's her brother so it's ok that han gets to bone her"

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If Han boning Leia is cucked then Han boning Luke's sister is UNLIMITED cucked

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It makes fine enough sense. You just wanted something different, and you’re mad that you didn’t get it. Just admit that you don’t actually like Star Wars, dude.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you couldn't pay me to watch that shite

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You know everybody will come in at A New Hope and leave after Jedi.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Most obnoxious people on earth making a big scene about leaving right after Jedi, I can picture it now

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine the smell in that theater by the time you get to the sequels

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >by the time you get to the sequels
      *to episode 2

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >by the time you get to the sequels
      That place will be fricking empty by then. Don't act like it won't be. No one wants anouther round of Rey, Finn, and Rose.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Light whip bros, we are so back

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What good is a whip that cuts through everything it touches? It'd be impossible to control.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        In canon lore, it was used by the Jedi of the Old Republic to overwhelm sith that wouldn't fight honorably.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          excuse me, you mean High Republic(tm)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, long before the High Republic
            When we see them in the high republic they are already considered a relic of the war against the sith, and the fact that a Jedi has one is considered novel by the order

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If this show isn't garbage the bald alien warrior woman will show skin it would be poetry it would rhyme with Asajj Ventress

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ,ngl this is impressive and takes me back to the classic Star Wars movies. If they do AMW39V right then I'll see it in the cinema dozens of times!

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >spend more money so George Lucas can give more to BLM and Disney can have more money to push its DEI bullshit

    That'll be a hard pass.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A descent through the 9 layers of Hell.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reading that list of movies started to make me feel physically sick as it got into the Disney ones.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its a good thing they removed the unique poster counter, now no one can tell this thread is mostly just a shill talking to itself.

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Seeing the list of movies like that makes me wonder if Lucasfilm regrets moving away from event-films

    If I were them, I'd be starting a new "saga" to take advantage of theatrical hype, while letting Disney Plus get the bulk of the lower stakes storytelling

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm sure this is exactly the plan, I just don't think we will see it for another long while.

      You say you want events, but rushing them into it defeats the purpose.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They have no idea what they are doing. I don't even mean that in a mean-spirited way, I mean they genuinely don't know what to do. Everything they put their full force into ends up failing. I would feel bad for them if not for the fact that they get paid to be blundering fools.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Everything they put their full force into ends up failing.
        You know this is just a Cinemaphile and Twitter thing, right?

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can an expanded cinematic universe with many stories be made without turning to absolute shit? So far star wars, marvel and dc suck fricking ass in what they became.
    Will we ever get a universe where the company that owns it has some fricking quality control?

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The Force is female

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      God, I love her. Make a NC-17 movie starring her as Aayla Secura infiltrating a Hutt slave market and constantly wearing the iconic slave bikini, and I would buy up every seat in the theater just so I could beat off in peace.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Who’d be Quinlan Vos? He was her master.

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That theater is going to clear out after Jedi.

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Revenge Of The Sith
    >Rogue One
    >A New Hope
    >The Empire Strike Back
    >Return Of The Jedi
    >The Force Awakens
    >The Empire Strikes Back (again)
    That would be my Star Wars marathon if I were a child that had a Star Wars marathon. I understand why people hate The Force Awakens but I thought it was an adequate reboot and then The Last Jedi completely ruined it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Attack of the clones
      >Revenge of the Sith
      >The OT
      done

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >including The Farce Engorges
      >ever

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not usually a big physical collector, but these steelbooks are pure sex.

    They should really do the whole franchise like this. Even the cartoons and stuff for the sake of completionism. Would be cool to have the whole saga.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > ai tier box art
      I care not.

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Boycott

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I thought there were only 6 Star Wars movies actually 3.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Boycott

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Boycott Disney

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    FRICK I work at a kinoplex. This is gonna suck staying open an entire day just for a handful of autists.

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No thanks I'll play KOTOR for 24 hours straight then I'd WILLINGLY pay REAL MONEY to see the sequels.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      well your save could get corrupted while you're playing that stupid shit while i'll be in the theater with my piss jug enjoying all 9 star wars movies

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >enjoying all 9
        Doubt

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          that's why the other jug will be filled with whiskey

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >your save could get corrupted
        The original KOTOR is actually quite stable in that regard. Buggy, but not to the point where savegame corruption occurs naturally.
        It was KOTOR2 (Bethesda) that notoriously could frick your game state up and effectively render it unfinishable.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >KOTOR2 (Bethesda)
          KOTOR2 was made by Obsidian.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ah, right. Sorry. Different flavour of incompetence.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Or you can watch this:

      ?si=g7Yn1iSlg5Hx_zOD
      Or this:

      ?si=1rw3G3KdJQkGQmtG

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fun Fact: Revan was intended to appear in TCW alongside Darth Bane as Sith Spirits telling the Son what to do. It's very likely that Revan was set to be retconned as the Sith founder, with the Dark Side ending being the canon one. Lucas changed his mind and got rid of the scene because the Sith can't have Force Ghosts of any kind.

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Still trying to push that skywalker saga tagline
    >Disney Wars is SW guys! come on! Remember her? Rey! the most powerful jedi! Rey Skywalker!

    KEK. How sad can they be?

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I never, for the life of me, understood the appeal of Star Wars. Explain it to me in one paragraph.

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for the acolyte to fail because it's full of trannies

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why not just play them simultaneously?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe also add subway surfer gameplay on the side in case I am bored please

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    any idea how the price of this works? do you have to pay for each movie or some moronic price for all of them?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Usually for those events, you get one single ticket for all of them. Either the whole thing or nothing.

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I never realized how easily you can tell the Disney Wars were soulless cashgrabs that don't care about established story from just the titles.
    >The Force Awakens
    So, "A New Hope" again?
    >The Last Jedi
    So things turned out to be a miserable shit show?
    >The Rise of Skywalker
    So the name is important and Vader didn't already overcome evil?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *