Superhero Horror

Why did Brightburn work and Multiverse of Madness fail?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because MoM still has MCU restrictions so it couldn’t go beyond Goosebumps tier scary

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/9t3PxWW.jpg

      Why did Brightburn work and Multiverse of Madness fail?

      >Implying Brightburn isn't also Goosebumps tier scary.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think lasering that guy's jaw half off or dropping his mother from 25,000 feet up is goosebumps tier.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The reshoots made it worse too.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Look on the bright side. They both did capeshit horror better than New Mutants.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Dude, even the Rainbow Brite movie was a better horror movie than New Mutants. That's really not a high bar.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Neither are scary but MoM never really tried to be outside of a handful of Raimi callbacks. Superhero horror doesn't really work outside of some rare few examples on the supernatural side.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Only the Blade trilogy and I guess the first Hellboy did it right and even then, those were action movies first.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Eh, Hellboy is more pulp than superhero. Same DNA but not quite the same. Blade falls firmly into the supernatural argument with the whole vampire thing though I doubt his new movie with have any "edge" to it if MoM was meant to be the MCU's take on horror.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        In what world are those movies scary?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          None. Not all horror is or needs to be scary.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Then what makes it horror?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Something that fills you with adrenaline or tension but through a more gothic, gory or macabre lens .

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know if those movies fill me with adrenaline or tension but maybe I'm just dead inside

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous
  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Brightburn didn’t work and MCU poop #8452 isn’t a horror

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >horror
    You're just scared of someone other than yourself having power and possibly using it against you. Eleutheromania, in other words.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Eleutheromania
      Well, well, well. If it isn't you again. Back from that Kim Possible thread I see.
      https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/128890190/

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Just because I've been here before, doesn't mean I'm wrong, especially seeing how many have confused other people for me over the use of a single word.

        People don't necessarily get into horror to be scared, some people just enjoy macabre things.

        >the existence of hierarchy of macabre

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      People don't necessarily get into horror to be scared, some people just enjoy macabre things.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly. No one in the right mind actually finds the Evil Dead trilogy to be scary. People just love it for the fricked up gore and visuals.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          These are just action movies with ghosts.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What metric are you using to say that Brightburn worked? The movie went by completely ignored

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    MoM isnt a failure in any metric

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >450mil opening
      >Couldn't make a billion
      That means people didn't like it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Still broke even and made a good profit.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Brightburn tapped into the fear of incels/stalkers, which are grounded real-world threats. The whole "grieving mother" thing didn't seem that scary for MoM, should've had her possessed by Cthon or something

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For me the issue with MoM is that they tried way too hard to justify making Wanda the actual villain. They kept piling on evil feats for her so that we wouldn't be on her side. There's no subtly or balance. She just goes on some murder spree and also kills Mr. Fantastic and Professor X so we should be against her. It makes morally grey concepts very black and white in an almost comical way.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        MoM is just a bad film. Here's Wanda killing everyone because she's evil and crazy, but also the Darkhold made her do it, but she's still totally the bad guy, but not really. Also if you didn't watch WandaVision you're probably a little confused and every feels weak and contrived, and if you did watch WandaVision you're probably pissed and everything feels weak and contrived.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Wanda was always a villain and only simps thought otherwise

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Brightburn didn't work though, it betrayed it's own premise like 30 minutes in. Brandon isn't a Superman that turned evil, he had his brain reprogrammed and became a serial killer.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's only one interpretation but that's never stated in the movie. Personally I don't think the ship directly controlled Brandon. He has moments where he hesitates, and those moments are always broken when someone gives him a reason to mistrust them. He didn't kill his mom and dad because the ship made him, he killed them because they tried to kill him first. The ship does influence him, but when choices are made it's always Brandon doing the choosing. I think his relationship with the ship is the poorest aspect of the film though. I understand their intent was to keep it ambiguous but the whole thing felt a bit too muddled.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Brightburn didn't work. It just went for jumpscares.
    It would've been better if Brandon had motivation beyond "ship told me to be evil".

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Exactly, then those motherfrickers had the audacity to tease us with evil Aquaman and Wonder Woman which would've been a million times more interesting.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >evil Aquaman and Wonder Woman which would've been a million times more interesting.
        No it fricking wouldn't.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You lack imagination

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    MOM was a masterpiece

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What about Nixonverse?
    https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYEu-9YXzZuKwVdyumtQxcmUgoQDIqfD_

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >named after an infamously "corrupt" politician
      >more cowering at the thought of people more powerful than us aligning with something other than a myopic non-value like freedom
      Yawn.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >the absolute state of the "horror" "genre"
    I guess I should expect nothing from a genre where trash like The Descent is held in high regard.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >a genre where trash like The Descent is held in high regard
      Weirdly specific diss; it would have just been easier to point out that they have been remaking Paranormal Activity non-stop for 15 years.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm just sick of this particular jumpscare-ridden shit being recommended to me as a pinnacle of the genre.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I just found it curious that you have beef against The Descent but I get what you mean, I remember back when I was in college and everyone was praising Cloverfield for not showing the shitty monster for more than two frames.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wdym? Cinemaphile hated brightburn

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is Brightburn any good? It looks like it'll be 99% parents looking concerned as their kid does some bad stuff like killing an animal or hurting their bully or other generic stuff and then 5 minutes at the end of a bunch of action.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No it's not. It's just another shitly written horror movie.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Brightburn was a really shitty movie too. An MCU movie was never going to be scary and anyone who insists Mom was is a massive pussy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It could have been scary if they just let Scott Derrickson to do his original vision of the film.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I wholeheartedly doubt it ever was scary

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's the same guy who did The Black Phone and Sinister.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I'm seconding what that anon said then.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Sinister was great though. Literally the only scary movie to come out in the past decade.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It was only ever "scary" when those reels were shown, otherwise it was generic as frick.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              It was only ever "scary" when those reels were shown, otherwise it was generic as frick.

              Sinister is scarier than any Sam Raimi horror film.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And A Simple Plan(1998), which isn't even one of Raimi's horror films btw, is scarier and more tense than any Scott Derrickson movie.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    MoM is as much of an horror as The Evil Dead 2 is
    Brightburn is your classic slasher with a kid from the 10's
    Neither are "superhero" horror, the kid from Brightburn could have been possesed by a demon and nothing in the plot would have changed. The Invisible Man or the remake of Earth vs. the Spider.
    >Blade and Hellboy
    Those aren't horrors either.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >MoM is as much of an horror as The Evil Dead 2
      So...very horror then. Evil Dead 2 is a classic for the horror genre.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Evil Dead was, from there onwards Raimi started to do his own thing (which is humor+fricked up visuals) or at least that's how i see it
        Heck the final movie of the trilogy is straight up an adventure one.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >MoM is as much of an horror as The Evil Dead 2
      So...very horror then. Evil Dead 2 is a classic for the horror genre.

      Evil Dead was, from there onwards Raimi started to do his own thing (which is humor+fricked up visuals) or at least that's how i see it
      Heck the final movie of the trilogy is straight up an adventure one.

      [...]
      Sinister is scarier than any Sam Raimi horror film.

      I think you guys are having a semantic disconnect; First lets acknowledge the fact that horror isnt necessarily made with the primary intention of scaring the audience.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's a cancerous mindset and the reason why genre is shit. Go back to BloodyDisgusting.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Uh huh, because focusing in scaring has helped out the genre so much right? Jumpscares and mystery boxes are such kino. Fricking moron.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >First lets acknowledge the fact that horror isnt necessarily made with the primary intention of scaring the audience
        If it isn't scaring than its making them uneasy or disgusted. If we'd start counting every movie with a skeleton in it as an horror then we'd have people saying that Pirates of the Carabbean or Indian Jones are horror.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *